DOCSLIB.ORG

Macedonia: Guns, Policing and Ethnic Division

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Macedonia: Guns, Policing and Ethnic Division Macedonia: Guns, policing and ethnic division Anna Matveeva with Duncan Hiscock, Wolf-Christian Paes and Hans Risser SAFERWORLD AND BONN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR CONVERSION OCTOBER 2003 Macedonia International boundary Autonomous province boundary Republic boundary Montenegro Sofia Prisˇtina KOSOVO Vranje SERBIA Prizen BULGARIA Kriva Palanka Lipkovo Vratnica Kumanovo Tearce Kratovo Blagoevgrad Aracˇinovo Tetovo SKOPJE Probistip Delcˇevo Kocˇani Sveti Nikole Gostivar Sˇtip Titov Veles Berovo ALBANIA MACEDONIA Radovisˇ Debar Brod Kicˇevo Negotino Kavadarci Strumica Novo Selo Krusˇevo Prilep Valandovo Murgasˇevo Struga Gevgelija Elbasan Ohrid Resen Bitola GREECE Thessaloníki Contents Acronyms 4 Preface 5 Executive summary 7 1. Recent history of Macedonia 12 2. Security challenges in the new state 15 3. Prospects and obstacles for disarmament 43 4. Disarmament options in a multi-ethnic state 58 APPENDIX 1: Report from the Skopje roundtable meeting 64 ‘Small arms and light weapons in Macedonia: priorities for action’, March 2003 APPENDIX 2: Skopje roundtable agenda and list of participants 69 Acknowledgements This report was produced as part of Saferworld’s small arms project in South Eastern Europe. Saferworld is grateful to the UK Government for funding their small arms programme. Saferworld would like to thank Larry Attree, Chrissie Hirst, Zoran Jachev, Aleksandar Matovski, Dana Plavcova and Trpe Stojanovski for their respective contributions to the report. Thanks also go to Henry Bolton, Kim Benedict Johnsen, Edward Joseph, Ann Rogers and Simon Rynn for their comments and feedback. Acronyms ABB Army Border Brigade ANA Albanian National Army (Armata Kombëtare Shqiptare – AKSh in Albanian) APC Armoured personnel carrier ARI Army of the Republic of Ilirida ARM Armija na Republika Makedonija (the Armed Forces of the Republic of Macedonia) BCP Border check point BCPR UNDP Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery BICC Bonn International Center for Conversion DDR Disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration DPA Democratic Party of Albanians DUI Democratic Union for Integration (Bashkimi Demokratik për Integrim – BDI in Albanian). EAR EU European Agency for Reconstruction EUFOR European Union Force FRY Former Republic of Yugoslavia FYROM Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia HCNM High Commissioner on National Minorities ICRC International Committee of the Red Cross IMF International Monetary Fund IOM International Organisation for Migration IWPR Institute for War and Peace Reporting JNA Jugoslovenska Narodna Armija (Yugoslav Peoples’ Army) KFOR Kosovo Force KLA Kosovo Liberation Army (Ushtria Çlirimtare e Kosovës – UÇK in Albanian) KPC Kosovo Protection Corps MoD Ministry of Defence MoI Ministry of the Interior (Ministerstvo za vnatreshni raboti – MVR in Macedonian) MPRI Military Professional Resources Incorporated NCB National Co-ordination Body NDP National Democratic Party NLA National Liberation Army (Ushtria Çlirimtare Kombëtare – UÇK in Albanian) OSCE Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe PDP Party of Democratic Prosperity PfP NATO Partnership for Peace RPG Rocket propelled grenade SACIM Small Arms Control in Macedonia SADU UNDP Small Arms and Demobilisation Unit SALW Small arms and light weapons SAM Surface-to-air missile SDSM Socijaldemokratski Sojuz na Makedonija (Social Democratic Union of Macedonia) SECI Center Southeast European Cooperative Initiative Center for Combating Cross- Border Crime SEE South Eastern Europe SEESAC South Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons SFRY Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia UÇPMB Ushtria Çlirimtare e Preshevës, Medvegjës dhe Bujanocit (Liberation Army of Presevo, Medvedja and Bujanovac) UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNHCR The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees UNMIK United Nations Mission in Kosovo UNPREDEP United Nations Preventive Deployment Force VMRO- Vnatreshnata makedonska revolucionerna organizacija – Demokratska DPMNE partija za makedonsko nacionalno edinstvo (Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organisation-Democratic Party of Macedonian National Unity) Preface THROUGHOUT THE 1990S, Macedonia was held up as an oasis of peace and stability whilst conflict affected most of South Eastern Europe, although by 1999 the conse- quences of the conflict in Kosovo were beginning to exacerbate tensions between the two communities in Macedonia. However, overt armed conflict did not appear until 2001, when Macedonia became the next link in a chain of conflicts that had accom- panied the break-up of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY). The easy availability of arms contributed to instability and created a strong temptation to use violence to settle political scores.In an impoverished and poorly functioning economy, the line between political and criminal activity became increasingly blurred. When fighting broke out in 2001 between rival Macedonian and Albanian communities, the international community machine that was engaged in nearby Kosovo was again galvanised into action to broker a peace agreement and help plot the way forward. Despite continued instability, the peace process has been gaining momentum, and the country’s prospects for developing a viable state and a functioning economy have improved with a return to comparatively stable and responsible governance in September 2002, in contrast to the political adventurism of the previous administra- tion. However, the proliferation of small arms and light weapons (SALW) inside the country and the high level of smuggling across Macedonia’s borders remain significant problems and continue to endanger peace. The political crisis in 2001 broke the taboo against the use of violence, and today arms are more visible, and more likely to be used than before the conflict. In such circumstances, collecting weapons and introducing effective gun control measures form an important pillar of the conflict prevention agenda. Now that there is a new government in office and the political tension has lessened, this is an opportune moment to address the issue of SALW in Macedonia, both by exploring the dimensions of the SALW problem itself, and by assessing national and international policies in the field of human security. The report seeks to explore the prospects for weapons collection programmes and the introduction of effective gun control measures in the current security environment in Macedonia. With the government weapons amnesty due to start on 1 November 2003, the report takes a timely look at its chances for success – and considers the possible implications if the amnesty does not go as planned. The chapter on ‘Sources and Scale of Arms Proliferation’ was written with valuable input from Zoran Jachev, Trpe Stojanovski and Aleksandar Matovski.1 The report is based on two fact-finding missions undertaken in July 2002 and January 2003, surveys of openly available sources, and conclusions and observations drawn from 1 In January 2002 Saferworld commissioned Forum – Center for Strategic Research and Documentation to produce a background research report on SALW in Macedonia. Parts of the report were used to prepare the current publication. 6 MACEDONIA: GUNS, POLICING AND ETHNIC DIVISION Saferworld’s and BICC’s other activities in the region. The report first analyses the nature of the problem of SALW proliferation by asking the following questions: how was the present situation arrived at? How did the initial armament take place? Who are the groups holding weapons and how do they operate? Why does the population continue to hold on to their guns? It then goes on to assess national and international measures that have so far been undertaken to tackle the problem, i.e. political commit- ments to disarmament, police reform, steps to revise the law and address cross-border crime, and public attitudes and the role of civil society. It concludes with an outline of the pros and cons of various disarmament options, and the implications that their implementation might have in Macedonia. The main argument of the paper is that the problem of SALW proliferation in Macedonia is a question of both politics and policing, resulting both from internal challenges and from the country’s vulnerability to outside influence within its turbulent neighbourhood. Therefore, measures to tackle the problem have to combine increased confidence among citizens in the political process with building public support for disarmament without letting criminal groups benefit from more humane approaches. The international community has expressed its willingness to help. The question now is how this willingness will be utilised by political forces in Macedonia. Executive summary THIS REPORT IS CONCERNED with the issue of small arms and light weapons (SALW) proliferation in Macedonia. Before the 2001 crisis, when fighting broke out between ethnic Macedonians and ethnic Albanians, most people in the country did not consider SALW proliferation to be a serious problem. This has now changed, and the government that was elected in September 2002, made up of the Social Democratic Union of Macedonia (SDSM) and the Democratic Union for Integration (DUI), con- cerned that the large number of illegally-held guns could act as a further catalyst for violence, has placed measures of weapons control and collection high on its agenda. This report assesses the scale and causes of SALW diffusion,considers the national and international efforts that have been taken to build security and reduce SALW prolifera- tion, and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report on Competitiveness “Natural-Born Clusters”
    REPORT ON COMPETITIVENESS “NATURAL-BORN CLUSTERS” Pristina, 2014 REPORT ON COMPETITIVENESS “NATURAL-BORN CLUSTERS” Pristina, 2014 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Financing provided by the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland in the framework of the Aid for Trade project. REPORT PREPARED BY: Cheng G. Ong – Author Supported by: Ilir Salihu and Paul Wittrock SPECIAL CONTRIBUTIONS PROVIDED BY: Ministry of Trade and Industry: The Cabinet of the Minister Department of Industry Department of Trade Kosovo Investment and Enterprise Support Agency UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (UNDP) KOSOVO QUALITY ASSURANCE: TEUta PURRINI XHABALI, Project Manager, Aid for Trade ANita SmaiLOVIC, Project Associate, Aid for Trade ARtaNE RIZVANOLLI, External Consultant ERËBLINA ELEZAJ, Research Analyst, Policy, Research, Gender and Communication Team BURBUQE DOBRANJA, Communications Associate, Policy, Research, Gender and Communication Team DANIJELA MITIć, Communication Analyst, Policy, Research, Gender and Communication Team A special gratitude goes to all interviewed businesses and other relevant actors. _________________________________________________________________________________ There is no copyright on this document; therefore its content maybe be partially or fully used without the prior permission of UNDP. Its source, however, must be cited. The analysis and recommendations expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not represent the official position ofU nited Nations Development Programme and the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. _________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • BALKANS Briefing
    BALKANS Briefing Skopje/Brussels, 27 July 2001 MACEDONIA: STILL SLIDING This ICG briefing paper continues the analysis of the Macedonian crisis begun in the ICG’s two most recent reports from Skopje: Balkans Reports No. 109, The Macedonian Question: Reform or Rebellion (5 April 2001) and No. 113, Macedonia: The Last Chance for Peace (20 June 2001). It analyses what has happened during the past five weeks, anticipates what may happen next, and describes the dilemma the international community faces if it is to improve the prospects of averting an open ethnic war. I. OVERVIEW almost nothing else separates the two sides, who have agreed on “95 per cent of those things that were to be negotiated”.1 Despite the ceasefire announced on 26 July 2001, and the promised resumption of political talks in Yet this is not how the matter appears inside the Tetovo on 27 July, Macedonia is still locked in country. Ethnic Macedonians believe the republic- crisis and threatened by war. Neither ethnic wide use of Albanian – as proposed by the Macedonian nor ethnic Albanian leaders have been international mediators – would pose a threat to converted to belief in a ‘civic’ settlement that their national identity that cannot be justified, would strengthen democracy by improving given that only one third to one quarter of the minority conditions, without weakening the population speaks the language. They are also integrity of the state. Ethnic Macedonians fear that convinced that all Albanians would refuse to civic reforms will transform the country communicate in Macedonian. Given that almost no exclusively to its, and their, detriment, while ethnic ethnic Macedonians can speak Albanian, they also Albanians are sceptical that any reforms can really fear that bilingualism would become necessary for be made to work in their favour.
    [Show full text]
  • Contestation of Kosovo's Statehood from Within: EULEX Judges Adjudicating Privatization Matters Through 'Status Neutrality
    Review of Central and East European Law 45 (2020) 432-443 Contestation of Kosovo’s Statehood from Within: EULEX Judges Adjudicating Privatization Matters through ‘Status Neutrality’ Kushtrim Istrefi Assistant Professor of Human Rights Law and Public International Law, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Member of the Netherlands Institute of Human Rights and Utrecht Centre for Accountability and Liability Law, Utrecht, The Netherlands [email protected] Abstract Kosovo’s statehood has been contested by foes as well as friends. Much is known about the former and less about the latter. This contribution explores the contestation of Kosovo’s independence by the judges of the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (eulex) working on privatization matters before Kosovo courts. As put by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kosovo (kcc), eulex judges working on privatization matters, “simply continued to ignore the existence of Kosovo as an independent State and its legislation emanating from its Assembly”. The kcc stated this after eulex judges working on privatization matters had refused to respect Kosovo laws and institutions subsequent to the 2008 Kosovo Declaration of Independence. This paper explores the judicial dialogue on Kosovo’s independence between eulex judges and the kcc and identifies the limitations and risks of the ‘status neutral’ policy applied by international organizations to collaborate with Kosovar institutions without prejudging its political status. This submission suggests that ‘status neutrality’ leads to either acceptance or contestation of Kosovo’s statehood and thus brings more uncertainty than clarity to Kosovo’s position in international relations. Keywords Kosovo – eulex – status-neutrality – contested statehood – international organizations © KUSHTRIM ISTREFI, 2020 | doi:10.1163/15730352-bja10036 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NCDownloaded 4.0 license.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Rights Assessment Report Fourth Edition
    COMMUNITY RIGHTS ASSESSMENT REPORT FOURTH EDITION NOVEMBER, 2015 Cover photograph: OSCE/Šehida Miftari, March 2015 Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe MISSION IN KOSOVO Community Rights Assessment Report Fourth Edition November, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 5 1. INTER-COMMUNITY DIALOGUE ..................................................................................................... 6 Inter-ethnic dialogue and dealing with the past ................................................................................ 6 Education and dialogue ...................................................................................................................... 7 2. SECURITY AND JUSTICE SYSTEM ..................................................................................................... 9 Security trends and responses ............................................................................................................ 9 Rule of Law ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Property rights and reduction of backlog ......................................................................................... 13 Access to Justice ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Die Makedonische Frage Von
    Geschichte und Politik / Südosteuropa Die makedonische Frage von Andreas Schwarz Stand: 06.08.2020 1 Inhaltsverzeichnis 0 Vorwort....................................................................................................................11 1 Einleitung – Das antike und das heutige Makedonien........................................14 1.1 Das antike Makedonien und die antiken Makedonier.....................................................14 1.2 Das heutige Makedonien....................................................................................................15 1.3 Die heutigen Makedonier...................................................................................................16 1.4 Die ethnischen bzw. slawischen Makedonier....................................................................16 1.5 Die Sprache der ethnischen bzw. slawischen Makedonier..............................................17 1.6 Die griechischen Makedonier.............................................................................................17 1.7 Fazit………………………………......................................................................................17 2 Der Frieden von San Stefano und Makedonien...................................................18 2.1 Hintergrund – Die Balkankrise........................................................................................18 2.2 Der Frieden von San Stefano............................................................................................18 2.3 Auszüge aus dem Friedensvertrag von San Stefano......................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Policy Yearbook 2008.Pdf
    Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs Minoritenplatz 8 A-1014 Vienna Tel: During office hours on work days between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. 0 50 11 50-0 / international: +43 50 11 50-0 or: (01) 90 115-0 / int.: (+43-1) 90 115-0 For general information: 0800 234 888 (toll free number, cannot be dialled from outside Austria) Fax: 0 50 11 59-0 / international: +43 50 11 59-0 or: (01) 904 20 16-0 / international: (+43-1) 904 20 16-0 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.bmeia.gv.at Citizens’ Help Desk In case of emergency abroad the Citizens’ Help Desk can be reached 24 hours a day: Tel: 0 50 11 50-4411 / international: +43 50 11 50-4411 or: (01) 90 115-4411 / international: +43 1 90 115-4411 Fax: 0 50 11 59-4411 / international: +43 50 11 59-4411 or: 0 50 11 59-245 / international: +43 50 11 59-245 or: (01) 904 20 16-245 / international: (+43-1) 904 20 16-245 E-Mail: [email protected] Assistance services available to Austrian citizens abroad are detailed on the homepage of the Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs at www.bmeia.gv.at under “Service”.  Austrian Foreign Policy Yearbook 2008 Report by the Federal Minister for European and International Affairs  Proprietor and Publisher: Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs A-1014 Vienna, Minoritenplatz 8 Austria Edited and Coordinated by: Thomas Schlesinger Christoph Weidinger Clemens Geelhaar Monika Lemmerer English translation coordinated by: Sabine Hübler Printed by: Manz Crossmedia GmbH & Co KG A-1051 Vienna, Stolberggasse 26 Austria The original German version is available at: www.bmeia.gv.at, or in printed form in the Information Management, Documentation, Knowledge Management Department at the Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs Preface In 2008, the international community faced a number of very special challenges, ranging from the global economic crisis and the problems of the European energy supply at the beginning of the year to the conflicts in Georgia and Gaza.
    [Show full text]
  • Hotel Industry Development in Kosovo Kaltrina Zeka [email protected]
    Rochester Institute of Technology RIT Scholar Works Theses Thesis/Dissertation Collections 7-2018 Hotel Industry Development in Kosovo Kaltrina Zeka [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses Recommended Citation Zeka, Kaltrina, "Hotel Industry Development in Kosovo" (2018). Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology. Accessed from This Senior Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Thesis/Dissertation Collections at RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hotel Industry Development in Kosovo Honors Project Kaltrina Zeka July 2018 Advisor: Venera Demukaj 1 Acknowledgments I am thankful to: My parents who are the main reason of my achievements, my success and the fact that I find it hard to compress my CV in two pages: My father and mentor of this senior project who is my main guide in business, in exploiting opportunities, and driving carefully. My mother who is the person that always made the situation and environment for me to do what I thought of, and worked on. My sisters and brother who are my main supporters, greatest friends and secret holders, and my biggest borrowers. My supervisor who is the most committed supervisor, and the person who relaxed from the part of my presentation when I said do you have any questions. My friends who are the main reason I laughed before exams, and after… My professors who explored my capacities, exploded them and made sure I didn’t pass deadlines.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kosovo Protection Corps. a Critical Study of Its De
    The Kosovo Protection Corps A Critical Study of its De-activation as a Transition Ade Clewlow Department of Security and Conflict Management Affairs International of Institute Norwegian Security in Practice 4 · 2010 [NUPI Report] Publisher: The Norwegian Institute of International Affairs Copyright: © Norwegian Institute of International Affairs 2010 ISBN: 978-82-7002-273-1 Any views expressed in this publication are those of the author. They should not be interpreted as reflecting the views of the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs. The text may not be printed in part or in full without the permission of the author. Visiting address: C.J. Hambros plass 2 d Address: P.O. Box 8159 Dep. 0033 Oslo Norway Internet: www.nupi.no E-mail: [email protected] Fax: [+ 47] 22 36 21 82 Tel: [+ 47] 22 99 40 00 The Kosovo Protection Corps A Critical Study of its De-activation as a Transition Ade Clewlow Lieutenant Colonel, MBE, Former KFOR Liaison Officer to the KPC The final KPC parade before De-Activation This report is part of the Norwegian engagement in the Multinational Experiment 6 (MNE-6). The project is financed by the Norwegian Ministry of Defence and is managed by the Innovation, Network Capabilities and Information Infrastructure Command (INI). Besides NUPI, the Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (FFI) and the Defence Staff College are also engaged in the programme. Further information can be found at: http://mne.oslo.mil.no Context This paper has been written from a practitioner’s perspective. The author spent 6 months embedded with the Kosovo Protection Corps (KPC) command team, spending hours in their company during its de-activation.
    [Show full text]
  • UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order Online
    UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order online Table of Contents Acknowledgments Introduction Glossary 1. Executive Summary The 1999 Offensive The Chain of Command The War Crimes Tribunal Abuses by the KLA Role of the International Community 2. Background Introduction Brief History of the Kosovo Conflict Kosovo in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Kosovo in the 1990s The 1998 Armed Conflict Conclusion 3. Forces of the Conflict Forces of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Yugoslav Army Serbian Ministry of Internal Affairs Paramilitaries Chain of Command and Superior Responsibility Stucture and Strategy of the KLA Appendix: Post-War Promotions of Serbian Police and Yugoslav Army Members 4. march–june 1999: An Overview The Geography of Abuses The Killings Death Toll,the Missing and Body Removal Targeted Killings Rape and Sexual Assault Forced Expulsions Arbitrary Arrests and Detentions Destruction of Civilian Property and Mosques Contamination of Water Wells Robbery and Extortion Detentions and Compulsory Labor 1 Human Shields Landmines 5. Drenica Region Izbica Rezala Poklek Staro Cikatovo The April 30 Offensive Vrbovac Stutica Baks The Cirez Mosque The Shavarina Mine Detention and Interrogation in Glogovac Detention and Compusory Labor Glogovac Town Killing of Civilians Detention and Abuse Forced Expulsion 6. Djakovica Municipality Djakovica City Phase One—March 24 to April 2 Phase Two—March 7 to March 13 The Withdrawal Meja Motives: Five Policeman Killed Perpetrators Korenica 7. Istok Municipality Dubrava Prison The Prison The NATO Bombing The Massacre The Exhumations Perpetrators 8. Lipljan Municipality Slovinje Perpetrators 9. Orahovac Municipality Pusto Selo 10. Pec Municipality Pec City The “Cleansing” Looting and Burning A Final Killing Rape Cuska Background The Killings The Attacks in Pavljan and Zahac The Perpetrators Ljubenic 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Law and Military Operations in Kosovo: 1999-2001, Lessons Learned For
    LAW AND MILITARY OPERATIONS IN KOSOVO: 1999-2001 LESSONS LEARNED FOR JUDGE ADVOCATES Center for Law and Military Operations (CLAMO) The Judge Advocate General’s School United States Army Charlottesville, Virginia CENTER FOR LAW AND MILITARY OPERATIONS (CLAMO) Director COL David E. Graham Deputy Director LTC Stuart W. Risch Director, Domestic Operational Law (vacant) Director, Training & Support CPT Alton L. (Larry) Gwaltney, III Marine Representative Maj Cody M. Weston, USMC Advanced Operational Law Studies Fellows MAJ Keith E. Puls MAJ Daniel G. Jordan Automation Technician Mr. Ben R. Morgan Training Centers LTC Richard M. Whitaker Battle Command Training Program LTC James W. Herring Battle Command Training Program MAJ Phillip W. Jussell Battle Command Training Program CPT Michael L. Roberts Combat Maneuver Training Center MAJ Michael P. Ryan Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Peter R. Hayden Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Mark D. Matthews Joint Readiness Training Center SFC Michael A. Pascua Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Jonathan Howard National Training Center CPT Charles J. Kovats National Training Center Contact the Center The Center’s mission is to examine legal issues that arise during all phases of military operations and to devise training and resource strategies for addressing those issues. It seeks to fulfill this mission in five ways. First, it is the central repository within The Judge Advocate General's Corps for all-source data, information, memoranda, after-action materials and lessons learned pertaining to legal support to operations, foreign and domestic. Second, it supports judge advocates by analyzing all data and information, developing lessons learned across all military legal disciplines, and by disseminating these lessons learned and other operational information to the Army, Marine Corps, and Joint communities through publications, instruction, training, and databases accessible to operational forces, world-wide.
    [Show full text]
  • Revision of Western Palaearctic Species of the Oulema Melanopus Group, with Description of Two New Species from Europe (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Criocerinae)
    ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE Published 1.vi.2015 Volume 55(1), pp. 273–304 ISSN 0374-1036 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:597F0FC8-27B7-4A94-ABF4-EA245B6EF06E Revision of western Palaearctic species of the Oulema melanopus group, with description of two new species from Europe (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Criocerinae) Jan BEZDĚK1) & Andrés BASELGA2) 1) Mendel University, Department of Zoology, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] 2) Departamento de Zoología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Rúa Lope Gómez de Marzoa s/n, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Five species of the Oulema melanopus group are recognized in the western Palaearctic Region: O. melanopus (Linnaeus, 1758), O. rufocyanea (Suffrian, 1847), O. duftschmidi (Redtenbacher, 1874), O. mauroi sp. nov. (nor- thern Italy), and O. verae sp. nov. (Spain and Portugal). The two new species are described and illustrated. The nomenclature of the group is discussed in detail. Oulema rufocyanea is proved to be a validly described species different to O. duftschmidi. To fi x the nomenclatural stability of the whole group and avoid sub- sequent misintepretations, neotypes are designated for Crioceris melanopoda O. F. Müller, 1776; Crioceris hordei Geoffroy, 1785; and Lema cyanella var. atrata Waltl, 1835 (all conspecifi c with O. melanopus). The primary type specimens or their photographs were examined if they exist. The spelling Oulema melanopus is fi xed as correct and explained. Variation in the cytochrome c oxidase (cox1) gene across specimens of all the species has been analysed. All species in the group had extremely similar haplotypes, with interspecifi c sequence similarities between 90.5–99.5 %, compared to intraspecifi c sequence similarities between 91.6–100 %.
    [Show full text]
  • European Security Forum a Joint Initiative of Ceps and the Iiss
    EUROPEAN SECURITY FORUM A JOINT INITIATIVE OF CEPS AND THE IISS A EUROPEAN BALKANS? ESF WORKING PAPER NO. 18 JANUARY 2005 WITH CONTRIBUTIONS BY JACQUES RUPNIK DANIEL SERWER BORIS SHMELEV SUMMING UP BY FRANÇOIS HEISBOURG ISBN 92-9079-532-8 © COPYRIGHT 2005, CEPS & IISS CENTRE FOR THE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE EUROPEAN FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES POLICY STUDIES Place du Congrès 1 ▪ B-1000 Brussels, Belgium Arundel House ▪ 13-15 Arundel Street, Temple Place Tel: +32 (0)2.229.39.11 ▪ Fax: +32 (0)2.219.41.51 London WC2R 3DX, United Kingdom www.ceps.be ▪ E-mail: [email protected] Tel. +44(0)20.7379.7676 ▪ Fax: +44(0)20.7836.3108 www.iiss.org ▪ E-mail: [email protected] A European Balkans? Working Paper No. 18 of the European Security Forum Contents Chairman’s Summing up FRANÇOIS HEISBOURG 1 Europe’s Challenges in the Balkans A European Perspective JACQUES RUPNIK 4 Kosovo Won’t Wait An American Perspective DANIEL SERWER 7 The Balkans: Powder keg of Europe or Zone of Peace and Stability? A Russian Perspective BORIS SHMELEV 13 Chairman’s Summing up François Heisbourg* he Chairman recalled the reasons for holding this particular session. On the one hand, at the Thessaloniki meeting of the European Council (June 2003), the prospect was Tlaid out of the Balkans being included, over time, within the European Union; hence, the title of the session. How that vision is to be fulfilled is obviously very much open to question, which is indeed one of reasons underlying the work of the new International Commission on the Balkans chaired by former Italian Prime Minister Giuliano Amato.
    [Show full text]