DOCSLIB.ORG

Collaboration and Team Science Field Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Collaboration and Team Science Field Guide Collaboration and Team Science Field Guide L. Michelle Bennett Howard Gadlin Christophe Marchand U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health Top Ten Take Aways TRUST It is almost impossible to imagine a successful collaboration without trust. Trust provides the foundation for a team. Without trust it is nearly impossible to sustain a collaboration. VISION A strong and captivating vision attracts people to the team and provides a foundation for achieving team goals. Shared vision provides a focal point around which a highly functioning team can coalesce. SELF-AWARENESS AND EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE Emotional Intelligence among team members contributes to the effective functioning of research teams. Self awareness gives people greater control over their own emotional reactions to others, improves the quality of their interactions, and helps build other- awareness. LEADERSHIP Strong collaborative leadership elicits and capitalizes on the team members’ strengths and is a critical component of team success. Leadership can be demonstrated by every team member, not just the formal leader(s). MENTORING Mentoring is an indispensable aspect of successful collaboration. A mentor recognizes the strengths of each team member, identifies areas in which newer scientists have the greatest potential to grow, and can help coach people to attain their aspirations. With good mentoring, the development of scientists is synchronous with strengthening team dynamics. PAGE: 2 Collaboration and Team Science Field Guide TEAM EVOLUTION AND DYNAMICS Research teams form and develop through critical stages to achieve their highest potential (Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing). A positive team dynamic sustains and further strengthens a research team, enabling it to achieve successful outcomes. COMMUNICATION Effective communication within and outside a research team contributes to effective group functioning. It depends on a safe environment where team members can openly share and discuss new scientific ideas and take research into new, previously unconsidered directions as well as ensure that difficult conversations can take place. RECOGNITION AND SHARING SUCCESS Individual contributions should be recognized, reviewed, and rewarded in the context of a collaboration. Recognition and reward of all team members should be done thoughtfully and fairly in the context of the team and the institution. CONFLICT AND DISAGREEMENT Conflict can be both a resource and a challenge—a resource because disagreement can expand thinking, add new knowledge to a complex scientific problem, and stimulate new directions for research. A challenge because if it is not handled skillfully, conflict impedes effective team functioning and stifles scientific advancement. NAVIGATING AND LEVERAGING NETWORKS AND SYSTEMS Highly collaborative teams can transcend different organizational structures, extending their reach across and beyond the organization. They often function within the context of multiple and sometimes interconnected systems, and they can help establish strong networks of researchers who together can accomplish more than they could as individuals. PAGE: 3 Collaboration and Team Science Field Guide Table of Contents TOP TEN TAKE AWAYS 02 INTRODUCTION 06 CHAPTER 01 | ENGAGING IN TEAM SCIENCE 07 This Is Pretty Obvious Stuff CHAPTER 02 | PREPARING YOURSELF FOR TEAM SCIENCE 12 The Value of Self-Reflection Understanding Personality Types Giving and Receiving Feedback The Value of Mentorship CHAPTER 03 | LEADING RESEARCH TEAMS 27 Leadership Dimensions CHAPTER 04 | BUILDING A RESEARCH TEAM 37 Launching a Team Setting Expectations CHAPTER 05 | TRUST 50 How to Foster Trust Among Team Members Types of Trust Psychological Safety Creating the Foundation for Trust and Psychological Safety CHAPTER 06 | VISION 58 How to Develop a Shared Vision CHAPTER 07 | COMMUNICATION 64 How to Communicate About Science Promoting Disagreement PAGE: 4 Collaboration and Team Science Field Guide CHAPTER 08 | CREDIT AND SHARING 77 How to Give Recognition and Share Credit Organizational Recognition and Reward How to Approach Recognition and Reward Recognition, Review, and Reward Catch 22 for the Tenure-Track Scientist CHAPTER 09 | MANAGING DIFFERENCE 90 How to Harness Diversity in Team Science CHAPTER 10 | CONFLICT IS NORMAL 100 Understanding Conflict How to Engage with Conflict CHAPTER 11 | SUSTAINING AND STRENGTHENING THE TEAM 112 How to Strengthen Team Dynamics One Bad Apple CHAPTER 12 | NAVIGATING AND LEVERAGING NETWORKS AND SYSTEMS 122 The Team as a System: Social Network Analysis CHAPTER 13 | FUN 128 ABOUT THE AUTHORS 130 APPENDIX 132 Collaborative Agreement Questions (Prenup for Scientists) Welcome to My Team Letter Template Offer Letter/Pre-Tenure Agreement Template REFERENCES AND RESOURCES 137 PAGE: 5 Collaboration and Team Science Field Guide Introduction Collaboration and Team Science: A Field Guide was first published in 2010. For nearly a decade, the Field Guide has served as a valuable resource for scientists participating in or leading a research team. It has also been used by those considering becoming involved in or building a research team. Graduate courses designed to focus on or integrate team science and interdisciplinary research into their learning have used it as a base text, and professional development offices have provided it to trainees to enhance their understanding of working collaboratively. Institutional leaders have used it to help guide change at an organizational level, shifting research culture from a primary investigator-initiated focus to one that embraces collaborative and efforts that cut across discipline-based departments. The original research foundation for the Field Guide was conducted with scientific teams at the NIH. Since its publication, the authors have had opportunities to travel nationally and internationally to conduct workshops and give lectures, as well as work with and learn from individuals, teams, and organizations. The learning from these experiences is reflected in this second edition. We were honored and humbled by the initial response to the Field Guide. That reaction enabled us to interact with and learn from others and continue collecting practical information as it pertains to collaboration and team science. As our learning expanded, it seemed time to update the Field Guide to provide additional information as well as to refine or enhance that which existed. We wish to thank Samantha Levine-Finley for her valuable contribution to the first edition of the Field Guide. We also want to thank Darlene Summers for careful editing of this version of the Field Guide. It is with appreciation for the opportunity to contribute that we have integrated several additional sections as well as resources into this new version. This new version of the Field Guide, as well as the content in the appendixes, can be accessed at http://teamscience.nih.gov. PAGE: 6 Collaboration and Team Science Field Guide CHAPTER 01 Engaging in Team Science Increased specialization of research expertise and methods has made interdependence, joint ownership, and collective responsibility between and among scientists near requirements. These features of team science may not suit everyone, but given these current trends, most researchers likely will find themselves asked to participate on or lead a research team at some point in their careers. The early 2000’s was met with a surge of interest and investment in multi- and inter- disciplinary team science programs from public agencies and private organizations alike. Today, with modern research methods becoming more specialized and pressing health issues being truly complex, collaborations among scientists trained in different fields have become essential. The field of inquiry termed the Science-of- Team-Science (SciTS) was coined in 2006. This field encompasses an amalgam of conceptual and methodological strategies aimed at understanding and enhancing the outcomes of large-scale collaborative research and training programs. In 2015, a report commissioned by the National Research Council presented an overview of what has been learned about “factors such as team dynamics, team management, and institutional structures and policies that affect large and small science teams.” (Cooke and Hilton, editors, 2015). There are many types of research teams, each one as dynamic as its team members. Research teams may comprise investigators from the same or different fields. Interdisciplinary teams have members trained in different disciplines bringing their unique expertise together to solve a problem or answer a question. Research teams vary by size, organizational complexity, and geographic scope, ranging from as few as two individuals working together to a vast network of interdependent researchers across many institutions and countries. Research teams have diverse goals spanning scientific discovery, training, clinical translation, public health, and health policy (Stokols, Hall et al. 2008). Innovations and advances not possible within one laboratory are emerging from collaborations and research teams that have harnessed techniques, approaches, and perspectives from multiple scientific disciplines and therapeutic areas. Team science has been described as a collaborative and cross-disciplinary approach to scientific inquiry that draws researchers, who otherwise would work independently or as co- investigators on smaller-scale projects, into collaborative centers and groups. PAGE: 7 Collaboration and Team Science
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Manager Cascade, Edit, Or Discontinue Goal(S) in Workday
    Talent Management: Cascade, Edit, or Discontinue Goals Manager Managers have the ability to add department-based goals or • Check the Include Subordinate Organizations to cascade cascade organization goal. Managers can also edit in-progress goals throughout all supervisory organization below yours. or discontinue a goal that is no longer relevant to the employee. 6. Click OK. • Write Team Goal 7. Write the goal in the Goal field. Add a detailed, SMART • Cascade Organizational Goal description. • Edit or Discontinue a Goal 8. Click the Category box to select if this is either an Organizational or Team goal. • View Team’s Goals 9. Editable will be pre-selected. This allows the employee to edit Tasks the goal title. 10. Click Submit. Write Team Goal Cascade Organizational Goal 1. From the Workday home page, click on the Team Performance app. Goals may be cascaded from a higher level of leadership, down through each level to reach all supervisory organizations. This 2. From the Actions column, click on the Add Goal to Employees section will include the steps of the leader writing the goal and the menu item. approval step of the immediate supervisor of the employee receiving the goal. 3. Select Create New Goal. Organizational Goal Writer: 4. To add to immediate team, use the Employees field: 1. Complete steps 1-3 and skip step 4 of Add Goal to Employee. • Select My Team and select individuals or 2. In step 5, click Ctrl, the letter A and Enter to select entire • Click Ctrl, the letter A and then hit Enter to select all.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 – Group and Team Performance 90
    Chapter 6 – Group and Team Performance 90 CHAPTER 6 – Group and Team Performance OBJECTIVES The major purpose of this chapter on group process and effectiveness is to introduce the student to ways to think about interacting groups so that they will become more effective members and leaders of them. Every student has had some experience with both social and task groups that they can call on as they study this topic. Our first objective in this chapter is to focus on how central these groups are to our lives. We also attempt to impress on the students that they will likely spend large proportions of their work hours in small group settings, because modern management appears to be making increasing use of teams or other small groups to solve problems, make decisions, and execute tasks. The next objective is to help student understand the many types of groups they may be involved with and how groups vary by purpose and organization. Another objective is to introduce students to a basic model of group effectiveness that includes influences from the environment within which the group operates. Environmental influences can have a critical impact on group effectiveness and the different types of influences are considered. At this point the chapter changes its focus to give more emphasis to internal group dynamics by covering such topics as cooperation and competition. Here, one objective is to introduce students to group development and the process by which groups become (or fail to become) mature. Another objective is to introduce the role of norms in influencing group member behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Standards
    SCIENCE It is the policy of the Oklahoma State Department of Education (OSDE) not to discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, gender, national origin, age, or disability in its programs or employment practices as required by Title VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Civil rights compliance inquiries related to the OSDE may be directed to the Affirmative Action Officer, Room 111, 2500 North Lincoln Boulevard, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105-4599, telephone number (405) 522-4930; or, the United States Department of Education’s Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights. Inquires or concerns regarding compliance with Title IX by local school districts should be presented to the local school district Title IX coordinator. This publication, printed by the State Department of Education Printing Services, is issued by the Oklahoma State Department of Education as authorized by 70 O.S. § 3-104. Five hundred copies have been prepared using Title I, Part A, School Improvement funds at a cost of $.15 per copy. Copies have been deposited with the Publications Clearinghouse of the Oklahoma Department of Libraries. DECEMBER 2013. SCIENCE Table of Contents 5-8 Introduction 9 K-5 Overview 10-18 ■ KINDERGARTEN 19-28 ■ 1ST GRADE 29-39 ■ 2ND GRADE 40-54 ■ 3RD GRADE 55-68 ■ 4TH GRADE 69-82 ■ 5TH GRADE 83 6-12 Overview 84-101 ■ 6TH GRADE 102-119 ■ 7TH GRADE 120-137 ■ 8TH GRADE 138-152 ■ PHYSICAL SCIENCE 153-165 ■ CHEMISTRY 166-181 ■ PHYSICS 182-203 ■ BIOLOGY I 204-219 ■ EARTH & SPACE SCIENCE 220-235 ■ ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE Introduction Science uses observation and experimentation to explain natural phenomena.
    [Show full text]
  • Science of Team Science and Collaborative Research
    Stephen M. Fiore, Ph.D. University of Central Florida Cognitive Sciences, Department of Philosophy and Institute for Simulation & Training Fiore, S. M. (2015). The Science of Team Science and Collaborative Research. Invited Colloquium, University of Cincinnati, Office of Research Advanced Seminar Series. October 19th, Cincinnati, OH. This work by Stephen M. Fiore, PhD is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License 2012. Not for commercial use. Approved for redistribution. Attribution required. ¡ Part 1. Laying Founda1on for a Science of Team Science ¡ Part 2. Developing the Science of Team Science ¡ Part 3. Applying Team Theory to Scienfic Collaboraon § 3.1. Of Teams and Tasks § 3.2. Leading Science Teams § 3.3. Educang and Training Science Teams § 3.4. Interpersonal Skills in Science Teams ¡ Part 4. Resources on the Science of Team Science ISSUE - Dealing with Scholarly Structure ¡ Disciplines are distinguished partly for historical reasons and reasons of administrative convenience (such as the organization of teaching and of appointments)... But all this classification and distinction is a comparatively unimportant and superficial affair. We are not students of some subject matter but students of problems. And problems may cut across the borders of any subject matter or discipline (Popper, 1963). ISSUE - Dealing with University Structure ¡ What is critical to realize is that “the way in which our universities have divided up the sciences does not reflect the way in which nature has divided up its problems” (Salzinger, 2003, p. 3) To achieve success in scientific collaboration we must surmount these challenges. Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Framework to Reinforce Evidence Synthesis Features in Cloud-Based Systematic Review Tools
    applied sciences Article A Comprehensive Framework to Reinforce Evidence Synthesis Features in Cloud-Based Systematic Review Tools Tatiana Person 1,* , Iván Ruiz-Rube 1 , José Miguel Mota 1 , Manuel Jesús Cobo 1 , Alexey Tselykh 2 and Juan Manuel Dodero 1 1 Department of Informatics Engineering, University of Cadiz, 11519 Puerto Real, Spain; [email protected] (I.R.-R.); [email protected] (J.M.M.); [email protected] (M.J.C.); [email protected] (J.M.D.) 2 Department of Information and Analytical Security Systems, Institute of Computer Technologies and Information Security, Southern Federal University, 347922 Taganrog, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Systematic reviews are powerful methods used to determine the state-of-the-art in a given field from existing studies and literature. They are critical but time-consuming in research and decision making for various disciplines. When conducting a review, a large volume of data is usually generated from relevant studies. Computer-based tools are often used to manage such data and to support the systematic review process. This paper describes a comprehensive analysis to gather the required features of a systematic review tool, in order to support the complete evidence synthesis process. We propose a framework, elaborated by consulting experts in different knowledge areas, to evaluate significant features and thus reinforce existing tool capabilities. The framework will be used to enhance the currently available functionality of CloudSERA, a cloud-based systematic review Citation: Person, T.; Ruiz-Rube, I.; Mota, J.M.; Cobo, M.J.; Tselykh, A.; tool focused on Computer Science, to implement evidence-based systematic review processes in Dodero, J.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Mothers in Science
    The aim of this book is to illustrate, graphically, that it is perfectly possible to combine a successful and fulfilling career in research science with motherhood, and that there are no rules about how to do this. On each page you will find a timeline showing on one side, the career path of a research group leader in academic science, and on the other side, important events in her family life. Each contributor has also provided a brief text about their research and about how they have combined their career and family commitments. This project was funded by a Rosalind Franklin Award from the Royal Society 1 Foreword It is well known that women are under-represented in careers in These rules are part of a much wider mythology among scientists of science. In academia, considerable attention has been focused on the both genders at the PhD and post-doctoral stages in their careers. paucity of women at lecturer level, and the even more lamentable The myths bubble up from the combination of two aspects of the state of affairs at more senior levels. The academic career path has academic science environment. First, a quick look at the numbers a long apprenticeship. Typically there is an undergraduate degree, immediately shows that there are far fewer lectureship positions followed by a PhD, then some post-doctoral research contracts and than qualified candidates to fill them. Second, the mentors of early research fellowships, and then finally a more stable lectureship or career researchers are academic scientists who have successfully permanent research leader position, with promotion on up the made the transition to lectureships and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • How Science Works
    PB 1 How science works The Scientific Method is traditionally presented in the first chapter of science text- books as a simple recipe for performing scientific investigations. Though many use- ful points are embodied in this method, it can easily be misinterpreted as linear and “cookbook”: pull a problem off the shelf, throw in an observation, mix in a few ques- tions, sprinkle on a hypothesis, put the whole mixture into a 350° experiment—and voila, 50 minutes later you’ll be pulling a conclusion out of the oven! That might work if science were like Hamburger Helper®, but science is complex and cannot be re- duced to a single, prepackaged recipe. The linear, stepwise representation of the process of science is simplified, but it does get at least one thing right. It captures the core logic of science: testing ideas with evidence. However, this version of the scientific method is so simplified and rigid that it fails to accurately portray how real science works. It more accurately describes how science is summarized after the fact—in textbooks and journal articles—than how sci- ence is actually done. The simplified, linear scientific method implies that scientific studies follow an unvarying, linear recipe. But in reality, in their work, scientists engage in many different activities in many different sequences. Scientific investigations often involve repeating the same steps many times to account for new information and ideas. The simplified, linear scientific method implies that science is done by individual scientists working through these steps in isolation. But in reality, science depends on interactions within the scientific community.
    [Show full text]
  • Peer Review of Team Science Research
    Peer Review of Team Science Research J. Britt Holbrook School of Public Policy Georgia Institute of Technology 1. Overview This paper explores how peer review mechanisms and processes currently affect team science and how they could be designed to offer better support for team science. This immediately raises the question of how to define teams.1 While recognizing that this question remains open, this paper addresses the issue of the peer review of team science research in terms of the peer review of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. Although the paper touches on other uses of peer review, for instance, in promotion and tenure decisions and in program evaluation, the main 1 Some researchers who assert the increasing dominance of teams in knowledge production may have a minimalist definition of what constitutes a team. For instance, Wuchty, Jones, and Uzzi (2007) define a team as more than a single author on a journal article; Jones (2011) suggests that a team is constituted by more than one inventor listed on a patent. Such minimalist definitions of teams need not entail any connection with notions of interdisciplinarity, since the multiple authors or inventors that come from the same discipline would still constitute a team. Some scholars working on team collaboration suggest that factors other than differences in disciplinary background – factors such as the size of the team or physical distance between collaborators – are much more important determinants of collaboration success (Walsh and Maloney 2007). Others working on the science of teams argue that all interdisciplinary research is team research, regardless of whether all teams are interdisciplinary; research on the science of teams can therefore inform research on interdisciplinarity, as well as research on the science of team science (Fiore 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Shared Leadership Underpinning of the MLCF
    Shared Leadership Underpinning of the MLCF A key product from the Enhancing Engagement in Medical Leadership project has been the development of a Medical Leadership Competency Framework (MLCF). This document defines the skills and competences needed by doctors to engage effectively in the planning, provision and improvement of health care services. It applies to all doctors and is intended to be acquired across the medical career at each appropriate level (Undergraduate, Postgraduate and Continuing Practice). It is therefore not aimed at specific, positional leaders but is seen as a set of competences that should be fully integrated into the medical role and not a separate function. The philosophical leadership model that underpins this approach is that of shared leadership, a more modern conception of leadership that departs from traditional charismatic or hierarchical models. In working with the MLCF it is useful to understand the shared leadership approach and this paper is an attempt to provide a simple description and guide to the shared leadership model, and to answer some of the questions about shared leadership that have been asked during the development of the MLCF: • What is shared leadership? • How does shared leadership underpin the MLCF? • How does shared leadership relate to positional leadership? • Where is the evidence that shared leadership works and what can we learn from other settings? • What evidence is there from health care and how do we apply shared leadership in a clinical setting? • What do the critics of shared leadership say? What is shared leadership? Leadership in any context has historically been described in relation to the behaviour of an individual and their relationship to their followers.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download Starting with Science Strategies for Introducing Young Children to Inquiry 1St Edition Ebook
    STARTING WITH SCIENCE STRATEGIES FOR INTRODUCING YOUNG CHILDREN TO INQUIRY 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Marcia Talhelm Edson | 9781571108074 | | | | | Starting with Science Strategies for Introducing Young Children to Inquiry 1st edition PDF Book The presentation of the material is as good as the material utilizing star trek analogies, ancient wisdom and literature and so much more. Using Multivariate Statistics. Michael Gramling examines the impact of policy on practice in early childhood education. Part of a series on. Schauble and colleagues , for example, found that fifth grade students designed better experiments after instruction about the purpose of experimentation. For example, some suggest that learning about NoS enables children to understand the tentative and developmental NoS and science as a human activity, which makes science more interesting for children to learn Abd-El-Khalick a ; Driver et al. Research on teaching and learning of nature of science. The authors begin with theory in a cultural context as a foundation. What makes professional development effective? Frequently, the term NoS is utilised when considering matters about science. This book is a documentary account of a young intern who worked in the Reggio system in Italy and how she brought this pedagogy home to her school in St. Taking Science to School answers such questions as:. The content of the inquiries in science in the professional development programme was based on the different strands of the primary science curriculum, namely Living Things, Energy and Forces, Materials and Environmental Awareness and Care DES Exit interview. Begin to address the necessity of understanding other usually peer positions before they can discuss or comment on those positions.
    [Show full text]
  • Team Leadership Styles
    Team Leadership Styles Leadership Skills Team FME www.free-management-ebooks.com ISBN 978-1-62620-988-6 Copyright Notice © www.free-management-ebooks.com 2013. All Rights Reserved ISBN 978-1-62620-988-6 The material contained within this electronic publication is protected under International and Federal Copyright Laws and treaties, and as such any unauthorized reprint or use of this material is strictly prohibited. You may not copy, forward, or transfer this publication or any part of it, whether in elec- tronic or printed form, to another person, or entity. Reproduction or translation of any part of this work without the permission of the copy- right holder is against the law. Your downloading and use of this eBook requires, and is an indication of, your complete acceptance of these ‘Terms of Use.’ You do not have any right to resell or give away part, or the whole, of this eBook. TEAM LEADERSHIP STYLES Table of Contents Preface 2 Visit Our Website 3 Introduction 4 Team Examples 6 Development Team Example 7 Customer Support Team Example 9 Steering Team Example 10 Leadership Theories 13 Early Trait Theories 13 Leadership for Management 16 Transactional Leadership 17 Applied to the Team Examples 19 Transformational Leadership 22 Applied to the Team Examples 24 Situational Leadership® 26 Applied to the Team Examples 28 The Leadership Continuum 30 Applying this Style to the Team Examples 32 Summary 34 Other Free Resources 35 References 36 ISBN 978-1-62620-988-6 © www.free-management-ebooks.com 1 TEAM LEADERSHIP STYLES Preface This eBook has been written for managers who find themselves in a team leadership role.
    [Show full text]
  • England Singles TOP 100 2019 / 52 28.12.2019
    28.12.2019 England Singles TOP 100 2019 / 52 Pos Vorwochen Woc BP Titel und Interpret 2019 / 52 - 1 1 --- --- 1N1 1 I Love Sausage Rolls . LadBaby 22342 Own It . Stormzy feat. Ed Sheeran & Burna Boy 34252 Before You Go . Lewis Capaldi 43472 Don't Start Now . Dua Lipa 5713922 Last Christmas . Wham! 6 --- --- 1N6 Audacity . Stormzy feat. Headie One 75575 Roxanne . Arizona Zervas 8681052 All I Want For Christmas Is You . Mariah Carey 9 --- --- 1N9 Lessons . Stormzy 10 1 1 201 11 Dance Monkey . Tones And I . 11 8 14 48 River . Ellie Goulding 12 11 --- 211 Adore You . Harry Styles 13 9 6 53 Everything I Wanted . Billie Eilish 14 14 22 1082 Fairytale Of New York . The Pogues & Kirsty McColl 15 12 11 296 Bruises . Lewis Capaldi 16 16 26 751 2 Merry Christmas Everyone . Shakin' Stevens 17 15 23 781 5 Do They Know It's Christmas ? . Band Aid 18 47 55 518 Watermelon Sugar . Harry Styles 19 24 39 3910 Step Into Christmas . Elton John 20 17 12 312 Blinding Lights . The Weeknd . 21 19 18 1314 Hot Girl Bummer . Blackbear 22 21 15 93 Lose You To Love Me . Selena Gomez 23 23 20 1020 Pump It Up . Endor 24 25 32 347 It's Beginning To Look A Lot Like Christmas . Michael Bublé 25 29 43 283 One More Sleep . Leona Lewis 26 35 40 426 Falling . Trevor Daniel 27 51 --- 3210 Lucid Dreams . Juice WRLD 28 31 33 2813 Santa Tell Me . Ariana Grande 29 34 44 804 I Wish It Could Be Christmas Everyday .
    [Show full text]