Bronze Age Worlds: Life and Landscape TRANSCRIPT Speakers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bronze Age Worlds: Life and Landscape TRANSCRIPT Speakers Bronze Age worlds: life and landscape TRANSCRIPT Speakers: Holly Elson (Museum of London) – introduction Kate Sumnall (Museum of London) – Chair Tom Booth (The Francis Crick Institute) Jane Sidell (Historic England) Andrew Gouldstone (RSPB Rainham Marshes) Holly: Hello everyone! Delightful to see you all. Welcome back to the Museum of London Docklands for our first on-site event since March. It’s felt like a very long time, so thank you all for coming and it’s a lovely pleasure to see you here. And hello also – I’m going to wave to the cameras – to the people who are joining us from home! So we’re running a hybrid event this evening, some of you are here in the room, some of you are joining us from your various locations in the world, so nice to see you, and thank you for joining us. So tonight’s talk is the first in a series of four talks that accompany our Havering Hoard exhibition, exploring different aspects of the Bronze Age and Bronze Age London. And we’re going to have three fantastic speakers this evening, and our Chair – one of our speakers will be joining us on this television screen. We’re going doubly hybrid, so we’ll have some speakers in the room, some speakers not in the room! So we’ll be doing a few different technical things throughout the evening - hopefully it shouldn’t be disruptive at all, but bear with us, this is a new thing that we’re trying. And also, ignore me as I come up and clean the microphone and the clicker in between each speaker – I’ll just be popping in quietly! Usual housekeeping to just remind you of – please make sure your phones are on silent. If you do wish to tweet, our information is here, you are welcome to. And if the fire alarm sounds, it’s the real thing, it’s not a drill – you can see our fire exit, modelled by the lovely Ian at the back of the room! Just follow us and we will take you to a place of safety. And that is all from me, so with delight I’m going to hand over to our Chair for this evening, Kate Sumnall, who is the curator of the Havering Hoard exhibition and who’s going to taking us through tonight’s discussion. Kate! Kate: Lovely, thank you very much Holly. Well, it is so nice to be out and to be in a room with people, this is enormously exciting! And we’ve got such a brilliant panel of people who are going to talk tonight, and I think we’re going to have some really interesting discussion. So it’s all about the Havering Hoard, which is an exceptional discovery. But one of the things that is so important about it is not that it’s just a massive Bronze Age Hoard, but it’s also that is was excavated as part of an archaeological site. Many Bronze Age hoards are found by metal detectorists, so we have the information about the hoard itself, but we’re missing the wider picture often. And so in this case we’ve got the information about the hoard, the immediate context of where it was buried, and then all the site data that tells us it was buried within the ditch of an enclosure. And then the wider landscape data as well, so we know how that site sat within the wider environment. And that is really important, because the landscape in Bronze Age was just so central to everyday life, it played a vital role. And so that’s one of the things we’re going to be looking at tonight, is the role of the landscape in everyday life, and what it can tell us. So the landscape – it’s the natural world. The hills, the rivers, the woods. And the landscape has been shaped by us, but it’s also shaped our activity of where we’ve chosen to settle – where we’ve done certain activities. That landscape’s not been a static unchanging thing. There’s the daily changes – the sun rises, the sun sets; the twice daily tides of the river. Then there’s the bigger seasonal changes, and then you have the larger, more dramatic climatic changes. Sometimes these are natural cycles of change, but even in prehistory, that change was also being accelerated, worsened by human activity. We know that in the Bronze Age it was a time of deforestation, and also climate change, climate warming and rising sea levels. But that landscape, there is something universal about it that calls to us. The sense of place, the sense of belonging at a spiritual level as well as a practical level. So many of us find a sense of calm being by water – whether that’s by the sea, or whether it’s by rivers. There’s also something I’ve been reading about recently about woodland bathing, where you can go and be immersed in nature – and that’s just simply a walk through woodland, and it’s had a proven effect on mental health, on depression, on stress. There is just a connection with the natural world that’s integral to us as human beings. And even for those that love storms, that like that wildness of nature, there is just something about it in the land that calls to us. In the Bronze Age people lived so closely with the land. We think, we have theories that the landscape may have been perceived as an ancestor. That possessions were not just things to be used, that they may have been imbued with a part of the person who owned it, and that is partly behind the significance of creating the hoard. But they lived and thought in many different ways to us, but there are still similarities, there are still things of familiarity, and that’s some of the things we’re going to be exploring tonight. I’m really pleased to welcome the first speaker of this evening, Dr Tom Booth, a senior research scientist at The Francis Crick Institute. He is a specialist in ancient DNA, and he has been studying how ancestry has changed in Britain in the Middle Bronze Age and the Late Bronze Age. Exploring how there has been a shift in the population, and what I’m really excited to delve down a bit more into, how this relates to the Bronze Age – the setting of what this means to the Havering Hoard and how we can flesh out a little bit more what we can understand about the people who created this hoard. So I’ll hand over to Tom now, Holly will come and clean things, and so we’ll be ready! Thank you. Tom: Thank you for that, Kate. So this is presenting some ancient DNA results from a project that’s actually run, that I’m sort of distally involved with now but was more involved with over that last few months, with the University of York and Harvard University in the US, looking at genetic change in Britain through the Bronze Age and into the Iron Age. The results still, as you will see, they’re robust but to some extend they’re preliminary and there are still aspects of them that we’re trying to work out. But I think it’s interesting to present this here, because I think that the DNA results very much contextualise the Havering Hoard on a European-wide scale. And there are aspects of the Havering Hoard which sort of reflect what we are seeing in the DNA, so in ways you can see the Havering Hoard as a sort of embodiment of lots of different things that were happening, particularly in the Late Bronze Age. So I’m going to have to explain a bit of technical detail to sort of get across some understanding of what we’re finding and what it means. So a few of you might know that we are living through what’s been called the archaeogenetic revolution of the last ten years. And this essentially means that rather than getting DNA from just single loci, or single parts of people’s ancestry - for instance the Y chromosome, your paternal DNA representing your paternal line if you’re a man, or your mitochondrial DNA representing your maternal line or your maternal descendants – we’re now being able to get ancient genomes, information from all the way across the genome, all 23 pairs of chromosomes as well as those other ancestrally informative markers. And what this means is we’re not just getting ancestry information from one person, or genetic ancestry information from one person, but that person is a combination of their genetic material that they’ve inherited from their ancestors. So as well as it being a single person, we can treat that person as a population of ancestors. And what that means is that with what can seem like relatively a low samples size we can make quite robust inferences about populations and population change through time. Genetic studies of Europe during the Neolithic and Europe during the Bronze Age have identified that these are major periods of population change. So during the Neolithic when you get the introduction of farming practices across Europe, it’s accompanied to varying extents by the introduction of ancestry which originates around the Aegean and Anatolia, and you can see through time that as Neolithic things and practices occur in that area so does this ancestry.
Recommended publications
  • Durham Research Online
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 18 October 2018 Version of attached le: Published Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Caswell, E. and Roberts, B.W. (2018) 'Reassessing community cemeteries : cremation burials in Britain during the Middle Bronze Age (c. 16001150 cal BC).', Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society., 84 . pp. 329-357. Further information on publisher's website: https://doi.org/10.1017/ppr.2018.9 Publisher's copyright statement: c The Prehistoric Society 2018. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, page 1 of 29 © The Prehistoric Society. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Bronze Objects for Atlantic Elites in France (13Th-8Th Century BC) Pierre-Yves Milcent
    Bronze objects for Atlantic Elites in France (13th-8th century BC) Pierre-Yves Milcent To cite this version: Pierre-Yves Milcent. Bronze objects for Atlantic Elites in France (13th-8th century BC). Hunter Fraser; Ralston Ian. Scotland in Later Prehistoric Europe, Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, pp.19-46, 2015, 978-1-90833-206-6. hal-01979057 HAL Id: hal-01979057 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01979057 Submitted on 12 Jan 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. FROM CHAINS TO BROOCHES Scotland in Later Prehistoric Europe Edited by FRASER HUNTER and IAN RALSTON iii SCOTLAND IN LATER PREHISTORIC EUROPE Jacket photography by Neil Mclean; © Trustees of National Museums Scotland Published in 2015 in Great Britain by the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland Society of Antiquaries of Scotland National Museum of Scotland Chambers Street Edinburgh EH1 1JF Tel: 0131 247 4115 Fax: 0131 247 4163 Email: [email protected] Website: www.socantscot.org The Society of Antiquaries of Scotland is a registered Scottish charity No SC010440. ISBN 978 1 90833 206 6 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Haplogroup R1b (Y-DNA)
    Eupedia Home > Genetics > Haplogroups (home) > Haplogroup R1b Haplogroup R1b (Y-DNA) Content 1. Geographic distribution Author: Maciamo. Original article posted on Eupedia. 2. Subclades Last update January 2014 (revised history, added lactase 3. Origins & History persistence, pigmentation and mtDNA correspondence) Paleolithic origins Neolithic cattle herders The Pontic-Caspian Steppe & the Indo-Europeans The Maykop culture, the R1b link to the steppe ? R1b migration map The Siberian & Central Asian branch The European & Middle Eastern branch The conquest of "Old Europe" The conquest of Western Europe IE invasion vs acculturation The Atlantic Celtic branch (L21) The Gascon-Iberian branch (DF27) The Italo-Celtic branch (S28/U152) The Germanic branch (S21/U106) How did R1b become dominant ? The Balkanic & Anatolian branch (L23) The upheavals ca 1200 BCE The Levantine & African branch (V88) Other migrations of R1b 4. Lactase persistence and R1b cattle pastoralists 5. R1 populations & light pigmentation 6. MtDNA correspondence 7. Famous R1b individuals Geographic distribution Distribution of haplogroup R1b in Europe 1/22 R1b is the most common haplogroup in Western Europe, reaching over 80% of the population in Ireland, the Scottish Highlands, western Wales, the Atlantic fringe of France, the Basque country and Catalonia. It is also common in Anatolia and around the Caucasus, in parts of Russia and in Central and South Asia. Besides the Atlantic and North Sea coast of Europe, hotspots include the Po valley in north-central Italy (over 70%), Armenia (35%), the Bashkirs of the Urals region of Russia (50%), Turkmenistan (over 35%), the Hazara people of Afghanistan (35%), the Uyghurs of North-West China (20%) and the Newars of Nepal (11%).
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Metallurgy in Atlantic Europe Proceedings of the Fifth Atlantic Colloquium
    THE ORIGINS OF METALLURGY IN ATLANTIC EUROPE PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH ATLANTIC COLLOQUIUM DUBLIN 30th March to 4th April 1978 Edited by MICHAEL RYAN DUBLIN. PUBLISHED BY THE STATIONERY OFFICE. To be purchased through any Bookseller, or directly from the GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS SALE OFFICE, G.P.O. ARCADE, DUBLIN 1 £19.50 CONTENTS Pages Acknowledgements Organising Committee M. Almagro-Gorbea Problems of the Origin of Metallurgy in the Iberian Peninsula (Pre Beaker Metallurgy) 1-6 A. Arribas and Fernando Molina Nuevas Aportaciones al Inicio de la Metalurgia en la Peninsula Iberica. El Poblado de los Castille- jos de Montefrio (Granada) 7-34 J. Arnal, A. Bocquet, A. Robert et G. Verraes La Naissance de la Metallurgie dans le Sud-Est de la France 35-63 J. Guilaine et J. Vaquer Les Debuts de la Metallurgie et les Groupes Culturels de la fin du Neolithique dans le Sud de la France (Languedoc, Causses, Pyrenees) 65-79 J. Briard Problemes Metallurgiques du Bronze Armoricain: Etain, Plomb et Argent 81-96 P. Harbison Who were Ireland's first Metallurgists? 97-105 J. S. Jackson Metallic Ores in Irish Prehistory: Copper and Tin 107-125 M. J. O'Kelly and C. A. Shell Stone objects and a Bronze axe from Newgrange, Co. Meath 127-144 L. N. W. Flanagan Industrial Resources, Production and Distribution in earlier Bronze Age Ireland 145—163 P. Holmes The manufacturing technology of the Irish Bronze Age horns 165-188 B. G. Scott The introductions of non-ferrous and ferrous metal technologies to Ireland: Motives and Mechanisms 189-204 G.
    [Show full text]
  • Bronze Age Iron Age Anglo-Saxons the Mayflower Thames Tunnel The
    Monday 11th – Friday 15th May 2020 History Think about what the word ancient means. Which description below do you think is the most accurate? 1. Ancient means a period of time five years ago. 2. Ancient means a period of time five hundred years ago. 3. Ancient means a period of time five thousand years ago. This half term, we will be looking at a time in history when people lived many thousands of years ago. People who lived many thousands of years ago lived in what we call ancient times. There were three main time periods (long lengths of time) in ancient times in Britain (the country we live in). We call these periods of time the Stone Age, the Bronze Age and the Iron Age. Bronze and iron are types of metal. Why do you think these periods of time were named after metals? Look at the pictures below. Can you match the ancient artefact (object) to the right time period? What clues can you see? We will be looking in more detail at the Bronze Age and Iron Age – they both happened after the Stone Age. The Bronze Age began around 2,100BCE (over 4,000 years ago). It lasted for around 1500 years until 750BCE when the Iron Age began. Bronze Age Anglo-Saxons Thames Tunnel 2,100BCE 750BCE 55BCE 0 410 1620 1825 1940 2020 Iron Age The Mayflower The Blitz Just like the Stone Age when early humans made tools from stone, the Bronze Age was called that because humans started making tools from…bronze! The Bronze Age started at different times around the world – depending on when humans in different countries discovered how to make bronze by mixing other metals together.
    [Show full text]
  • Neolithic Report
    RESEARCH DEPARTMENT REPORT SERIES no. 29-2011 ISSN 1749-8775 REVIEW OF ANIMAL REMAINS FROM THE NEOLITHIC AND EARLY BRONZE AGE OF SOUTHERN BRITAIN (4000 BC – 1500 BC) ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES REPORT Dale Serjeantson ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Department Report Series 29-2011 REVIEW OF ANIMAL REMAINS FROM THE NEOLITHIC AND EARLY BRONZE AGE OF SOUTHERN BRITAIN (4000 BC – 1500 BC) Dale Serjeantson © English Heritage ISSN 1749-8775 The Research Department Report Series, incorporates reports from all the specialist teams within the English Heritage Research Department: Archaeological Science; Archaeological Archives; Historic Interiors Research and Conservation; Archaeological Projects; Aerial Survey and Investigation; Archaeological Survey and Investigation; Architectural Investigation; Imaging, Graphics and Survey; and the Survey of London. It replaces the former Centre for Archaeology Reports Series, the Archaeological Investigation Report Series, and the Architectural Investigation Report Series. Many of these are interim reports which make available the results of specialist investigations in advance of full publication. They are not usually subject to external refereeing, and their conclusions may sometimes have to be modified in the light of information not available at the time of the investigation. Where no final project report is available, readers are advised to consult the author before citing these reports in any publication. Opinions expressed in Research Department Reports are those of the author(s) and are not necessarily those of English Heritage. Requests for further hard copies, after the initial print run, can be made by emailing: [email protected]. or by writing to English Heritage, Fort Cumberland, Fort Cumberland Road, Eastney, Portsmouth PO4 9LD Please note that a charge will be made to cover printing and postage.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Bronze Age Metalwork from the Iberian Peninsula in the British Museum
    A M P U R I A S (Barcelona) t. 43, 1981, pagines 113- 170 A Study of the Bronze Age Metalwork from the Iberian Peninsula in the British Museum By RICHARDJ. HARRISONand PAULT. CRADDOCK with an appendix by MICHAELJ. HUGHES" The collections of prehistoric bronze the Very Reverend Canon Greenwell of metalwork discussed here have accumula- Durham Cathedral. He was actively co- ted in a fortuitous manner for over llecting bronzes in the latter part o£ 125 years, with a succession of gifts large the nineteenth century, and through his aild small, purchases, and transfers from friendly contacts with Horace Sandars, he other collections. The opportunity arose to was able to acquire type-specimens from catalogue and examine the entire collec- the Iberian Peninsula. The part of his tion, and to make it available for inclu- collection containing these items was sion into the synthetic works that are now bought by the American financier James actively in progress. Pierpont Morgan, and presented outright The year 1849 marks the acquisition of to the Museum as a gift in 1909. the first prehistoric bronze implement Other important pieces were acquired from Spain, donated by Mr. S. P. Pratt, in 1964 when the Wellcome Collection was F. R. S., and published the same year by presented to the Museum. The included Mr. James Yates. For a long time this a dozen Early Bronze Age pieces from double-looped palstave was one of the George Bonsor's old excavations around Few published prehistoric bronzes known Carmona (Prov. Sevilla) in the period Erom the Peninsula, and it has been illus- 1890-1910, and which seem to have come trated many times since then.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeologia Cantiana
    Archaeologia Cantiana On-line Index GENERAL INDEX TO VOLUMES CXXI 2000 (121) to CXXX (130) Letter B Back to Index Introduction This index covers volumes 121–130 inclusive (2001–2010) of Archaeologia Cantiana. It includes all significant persons, places and subjects. Volume numbers are shown in bold type and illustrations are denoted by page numbers in italic type or by (illus.) where figures occur throughout the text. The letter n after a page number indicates that the reference will be found in a footnote. Alphabetisation is word by word. Women are indexed by their maiden name, where known, with cross references from any married name(s). All places within historic Kent are included and are arranged by civil parish. Places that fall within Greater London are to be found listed under their own name i.e. Eltham etc. Places outside Kent that play a significant part in the text are followed by their post 1974 county. Place names with two elements (e.g. East Peckham, Upper Hardres) will be found indexed under their full place name. This cumulative index was compiled by Mr Ted Connell. T. G. LAWSON, Honorary Editor Kent Archaeological Society, July 2014 Abbreviations m. married Ald. Alderman E. Sussex East Sussex M.P. Member of Parliament b. born ed./eds. editor/editors Notts. Nottinghamshire B. & N.E.S. Bath and North East f facing Oxon. Oxfordshire Somerset fl. floruit P.M. Prime Minister Berks. Berkshire G. London Greater London Pembs. Pembrokeshire Bt. Baronet Gen. General Revd Reverend Bucks. Buckinghamshire Glam. Glamorgan Sgt Sergeant C Century Glos. Gloucestershire snr.
    [Show full text]
  • Bronze Age Warfare in Barbaric Europe - Current Trends and Perspectives in the Future
    Perspective Glob J Arch & Anthropol Volume 4 Issue 1 - May 2018 DOI: 10.19080/GJAA.2018.04.555628 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Davide Delfino Bronze Age Warfare in Barbaric Europe - Current Trends and Perspectives in the Future Davide Delfino* Center for Geosciences of the University of Coimbra, Instituto Terra e Memória, Portugal Submission: February 02, 2018; Published: May 11, 2018 *Corresponding author: Davide Delfino, Center for Geosciences of the University of Coimbra, Instituto Terra e Memória, Portugal, Email: Abstract Research on prehistoric warfare is in progress since 60 years. But investigation specifically on Bronze Age period, when some tools are exclusively created for fight and the warrior societies are emerging, is always young. Scholars there were mainly interested on the origins of violence in mankind, on the fighting in the Neolithic or, if Bronze Age, on the wars in the empires of the Near East or in the Minoan civilization. But the warfare in the European Bronze Age up to a decade ago, it was dealt marginally. Violence and warfare in Bronze Age in “barbarian Europe”, to use an expression by Jaques Briard, can be defined as a “fashion” since the mid-2000s. Recent trends are analyzed according to various perspectives: generals, theoretical, study of material cultures and context, and interpretative tendencies. So will be discuss what the commonly acceptedKeywords: theories and what also remain subject of doubt and debate to draw a perspective for the future. European Bronze Age; Warfare; Literature review;
    [Show full text]
  • Rock Art and Metal Trade
    Johan Ling and Claes Uhnér Rock Art and Metal Trade Introduction In this paper, we argue that Nordic Bronze The supply of copper and tin to south- Age rock art was influenced by certain ern Scandinavia increased significantly European regions and networks, which sup- around 1600 BC (Vandkilde 1996, 2014), plied metal to Scandinavia, and that the and after this date started rock art motifs local figurative repertoire replied to chang- to appear which depicts metals and equip- ing metal sources and networks in a distinct ment communicating personal status and manner (fig. 1). non-domestic cosmopolitan features. First We attempt to exemplify this hypothesis weapons, oxhide ingots, chariots and repre- by comparing rock art and other stylistic sentations of the sun, and later armour and forms and features from different regions. mirrors (Kaul 1998; Coles 2005; Ling 2008). However, an important precondition is These figurative features articulated ex- new scientific evidence that shows that clusive ‘social codes’ or ‘core values’ which Scandinavian bronzes were produced with were shared over large parts of Europe (cf. non-local copper and tin, predominantly of Thrane 1990; Treherne 1995; Kaul 1998; Mediterranean and northern Alpine origin Fredell 2003; Harrison 2004; Coles 2005; (Ling et al. 2013, 2014). Kristiansen & Larsson 2005). Figure 1. Prominent components of Scandinavian Bronze Age ideology comprising of moving metals, ships, celestial symbols and warrior iconography. Rock art panel from Ekenberg, Östergötland, Sweden. Documentation by Evers, source SHFA. Adoranten 2014 23 Metal sources, ing 900 – 700 cal BC, although most of the networks and suppliers analysed objects have signatures consistent In order to recognise external influences with northern Tyrol during this last period.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Neolitisches Tellsiedlung in Gălăbnik by Juraj Pavúk
    The Prehistoric Society Book Reviews DIE NEOLITISCHES TELLSIEDLUNG IN GĂLĂBNIK BY JURAJ PAVÚK AND ANETA BAKAMSKA Mitteilungen der Prähistorischen Kommission 91. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. 2021. 435pp, 153 figures, 81 photos, pb, €169.00 This volume neatly bookends two of the principal features of the Aegean–Balkan–Carpathian (‘ABC’) Neolithic – the endless debates over typo-chronology and the immense richness of settlement finds. In the former, the tell stratigraphy of Argissa Magula, in Thessaly, Greece, casts a long shadow over Balkan Neolithic studies. Vladimir Milojčić’ sequence of five stages for the Early and Middle Neolithic (Aceramic; Monochrome; Proto-Sesklo; Pre-Sesklo; and Sesklo) is largely responsible for three issues for the spread of the Balkan Neolithic: the existence of an aceramic stage in Greece and the Balkans as well as in the Near East, the existence of a monochrome stage without painted pottery in the Balkans and the possibility of a threefold division of the Early Neolithic in the Balkans. While we cannot state for certain that all three possibilities have been conclusively falsified for the Balkans, this is now the most likely interpretation of the mass of new site evidence accumulated since Milojčić’ excavations in the 1950s. Unfortunately, the third dubious possibility is the basis for Pavúk and Bakamska’s otherwise impressive monograph on the site of Gălăbnik. Moreover, throughout post-Milojčić discussions of Greek and Balkan Neolithic chronology, there has been a virtually unchallenged equation between ‘pots’ and ‘people’ that has long since been discarded in other regions of Europe and beyond. Welcome to the Balkan Neolithic! The Gălăbnik volume, dedicated to the late Mikhail Chohadzhiev, is divided into two parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Session 1. Archaeology Is a Political Matter
    SESSION 1. ARCHAEOLOGY IS A POLITICAL MATTER (Wednesday, 21st Dec., Lecture Theatre C) Rob Lennox, Council for British Archaeology, Chartered Institute of Archaeologists, University of York, and Lorna-Jane Richardson Umeå University, Council for British Archaeology 09:00 – 09:10 Introduction 09:10 – 09:30 The politics of Brexit. Why archaeologists need to be concerned, Kevin Wooldridge, Freelance archaeologist 09:30 – 09:50 Quitting my archaeological job as a political deed, Marjolijn Kok, Bureau Archeologie en Toekomst, Netherlands 09:50 – 10:10 Commercial archaeology and narratives of British exceptionalism, Florence Smith Nicholls, Compass Archaeology 10:10 – 10:30 Selling a political framework for the Public Value Era, Rob Lennox, University of York 10:30 – 10:50 Breaking ground, fighting back; Unite Digging for a Living Wage, Matthew Seaver, Unite Archaeological Branch, Ireland 10:50 – 11:10 Coffee Break 11:10 – 11:30 Time to bite the hand that feeds? Or, at the very least, give it a long, hard squeeze, David Jennings, University of York 11:30 – 11:50 "Another Brick in the Wall" - Archaeological Outreach in Schools as a Political Act, Penelope Foreman, Bournemouth University 11:50 – 12:10 DNA and Soil: Archaeology, Palaeogenetics and Nationalism, Tom Booth, Natural History Museum, London 12:10 – 12:30 Where history meets legend… and produces political sparks; presenting Tintagel Castle, Cornwall, Susan Greaney, Cardiff University/ English Heritage 12:30 – 12:50 Turf Wars: Politics and Peatland Archaeology in Ireland, Ben Gearey,
    [Show full text]