Congressional Record—Senate S4098

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Congressional Record—Senate S4098 S4098 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE June 11, 2015 WYDEN, also wishes to provide separate port his interpretation of this provi- people gave a comparable amount of and related comments. sion. In accordance with longstanding $356 million through small-dollar dona- In setting out what is to be taken as historical practice, and because of im- tions of $200 or less. Astonishing as ‘‘major legislation,’’ the budget resolu- portant practical considerations, the these figures are, they don’t include tion specifies that legislation may be chair and vice chair of the Joint Com- the $173 million spent in the 2014 elec- designated to be ‘‘major’’ if the Sen- mittee on Taxation should exercise tion cycle by tax-exempt ‘‘dark ator or House Member who is chairman principal control over the revenue esti- money’’ groups that are not required to or vice chairman of the Joint Com- mating process, and section 3112 should publicly disclose their donors. mittee on Taxation, or JCT, designates not be interpreted to authorize the Deep-pocketed special interests are the legislation as such ‘‘for revenue chairs of the Budget Committees to aiming to control the agenda in Con- legislation.’’ Of course, such language interfere with JCT’s responsibility for gress. It is time to fight back and fun- is entirely consistent with existing and control over revenue estimates in damentally reform the way we finance laws and practice, under which the re- any part of the congressional budget congressional elections. We need a sys- sponsibility and control over revenue process. tem that allows candidates to focus on estimates in the congressional budget However, I must note that on the constituents instead of fundraising—a process lies squarely with the chair and broader point of dynamic estimates, I system that encourages ordinary vice chair of the JCT. am opposed, and I was therefore op- Americans to make their voice heard The budget resolution also specifies posed to section 3112 being included in with small, affordable donations to the that legislation may be designated to the budget resolution and conference candidate of their choice. be ‘‘major’’ if the chair of the Com- agreement to start with. Dynamic esti- That is why I am once again intro- mittee on the Budget in the Senate or mates rely on shaky math and conven- ducing the Fair Elections Now Act. the House designates the legislation as ient assumptions that reward advo- While this bill cannot solve all of the such ‘‘for all direct spending and rev- cates of tax cuts while punishing advo- problems facing our Nation’s campaign enue legislation.’’ Of course, existing cates of long-term investments in peo- finance system, the Fair Elections Now laws and practice assigns responsibility ple and our Nation’s infrastructure. Act will dramatically change the way and control over spending estimates f campaigns are funded. This bill allows with the Budget Committees. However, FAIR ELECTIONS NOW ACT candidates to focus on the people they the budget resolution includes ‘‘rev- represent, regardless of whether those enue legislation’’ as part of what the Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, it was 8 people have the wealth to attend a big Budget Committee chairs may use for years ago that I first introduced the money fundraiser or donate thousands designating legislation as being Fair Elections Now Act. Former Sen- of dollars. ‘‘major.’’ ator Arlen Specter, our late colleague I would like to thank Sens. BALDWIN, As I understand the intent of the lan- and former chairman of the Judiciary BOXER, BROWN, FRANKEN, GILLIBRAND, guage, when major legislation is to be Committee, was my lead cosponsor. We HEINRICH, KLOBUCHAR, LEAHY, MARKEY, considered, there can be cases in which introduced the bill because we believed MCCASKILL, MENENDEZ, MERKLEY, MUR- the legislation may require estimates that America needs a system that re- PHY, SANDERS, SHAHEEN, UDALL, and both from the JCT and from the Con- wards candidates with the best ideas WARREN for cosponsoring the Fair gressional Budget Office, or CBO. In and principles—not just the person who Elections Now Act and joining me in such cases, there is nothing to prohibit is the most talented in raising special this effort to reform our campaign fi- use of longstanding practice in which interest money. nance system. the Budget Committees consult with I noted that day that our democracy the chair and vice chair of the JCT to was in trouble because special interests The Fair Elections Now Act will help ensure that any necessary revenue esti- and big-donor money were choking the restore public confidence in congres- mates are arrived at by the JCT, for system and preventing us from facing sional elections by providing qualified use in scoring major legislation. To be up to the big challenges of our time. candidates for Congress with grants, clear, however, nothing in the budget Little did I know that almost a decade matching funds, and vouchers from the resolution should be taken to mean later, this problem would have grown Fair Elections Fund to replace cam- that the chairs of the Budget Commit- much worse. paign fundraising that largely relies on tees have authority to interfere with Through a series of recent cases—in- lobbyists, wealthy donors, corpora- the responsibility and control over rev- cluding the infamous Citizens United tions, and other special interests. In re- enue estimates in any part of the con- decision—the Supreme Court has al- turn, participating candidates would gressional budget process which, as I lowed wealthy, well-connected cam- agree to limit their campaign spending identified earlier, lies squarely with paign donors and special interests to to amounts raised from small-dollar the chair and vice chair of the JCT. unleash a deluge of cash in an effort to donors plus the amounts provided from It is my understanding that the budg- sway Federal, State, and local elec- the Fair Elections Fund. et resolution does not direct or allow tions across our Nation. When it comes The Fair Elections system would for any possibility of such interference, to understanding the influence of have three stages for Senate can- and my purpose in the remarks I am wealthy donors and special interests on didates. First, candidates would need making today is to make that under- Federal elections, the numbers speak to prove their viability by raising a standing clear. As I have mentioned, for themselves. minimum number and amount of longstanding practice has been that if In the 2012 election cycle, candidates small-dollar qualifying contributions a need arises for the CBO to obtain in- for both the House and Senate raised from in-state donors. Qualified can- formation on major legislation from the majority of their funds from large didates would then be required to limit the JCT in terms of revenue estimates donations of $1,000 or more. Forty per- the amount raised from each donor to or effects of legislative proposals on cent of all contributions to Senate can- $150 per election. marginal effective tax rates, Budget didates came from donors who maxed In the primary, participants would Committee members can ensure that out at the $2,500 contribution limit, receive a base grant that would vary in those estimates and effects are ob- representing just 0.02 percent of the amount based on the population of the tained by consulting with the chair and American population. State that the candidate seeks to rep- vice chair of the JCT. This long- We saw this trend continue during resent. Participants would also receive standing practice ensures smooth proc- the recent midterm elections. The 100 a 6 to 1 match for small-dollar dona- essing of the JCT’s workload, and pre- biggest donors gave a combined $323 tions up to a defined matching cap. vents any direct control or interven- million during the 2014 election cycle After reaching that cap, the candidate tion in JCT’s workload from other through official campaign contribu- could raise an unlimited amount of $150 committees with other jurisdictions. tions and donations to national party contributions, as well as contributions Mr. WYDEN. Mr. President, I share committees, PACs, Super PACs, and from small-donor People PACs. the concern of my colleague, the Fi- 527 organizations. In contrast to those In the general election, qualified can- nance Committee chairman, and I sup- 100 donors, an estimated 4.75 million didates would receive an additional VerDate Sep 11 2014 04:01 Jun 12, 2015 Jkt 049060 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G11JN6.071 S11JNPT1 smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with SENATE June 11, 2015 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S4099 grant, further small-dollar matching, democracy, and we must address it. Ev- Opera of Chicago, Stroger Hospital, and and vouchers for purchasing television eryone is entitled to a seat at the in universities across the Nation. advertising. The candidate could con- table, but wealthy donors and big cor- Lester and his wife Renee have been tinue to raise an unlimited amount of porations shouldn’t be able to buy happily married for more than 60 years $150 contributions, as well as contribu- every seat. and have seven children. Renee serves tions from small-donor People PACs. The Fair Elections Now Act will re- as a founding member and former Under the Fair Elections Now Act, form our campaign finance system so president of the Women’s Board of candidates would have an incentive to that members of Congress can focus on Northwestern University and a life di- seek small donations. And citizens implementing policies in the best in- rector of the Multiple Sclerosis Soci- would have an incentive to donate to terest of the people who elected them— ety.
Recommended publications
  • 2006-07 Annual Report
    ����������������������������� the chicago council on global affairs 1 The Chicago Council on Global Affairs, founded in 1922 as The Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, is a leading independent, nonpartisan organization committed to influencing the discourse on global issues through contributions to opinion and policy formation, leadership dialogue, and public learning. The Chicago Council brings the world to Chicago by hosting public programs and private events featuring world leaders and experts with diverse views on a wide range of global topics. Through task forces, conferences, studies, and leadership dialogue, the Council brings Chicago’s ideas and opinions to the world. 2 the chicago council on global affairs table of contents the chicago council on global affairs 3 Message from the Chairman The world has undergone On September 1, 2006, The Chicago Council on tremendous change since Foreign Relations became The Chicago Council on The Chicago Council was Global Affairs. The new name respects the Council’s founded in 1922, when heritage – a commitment to nonpartisanship and public nation-states dominated education – while it signals an understanding of the the international stage. changing world and reflects the Council’s increased Balance of power, national efforts to contribute to national and international security, statecraft, and discussions in a global era. diplomacy were foremost Changes at The Chicago Council are evident on on the agenda. many fronts – more and new programs, larger and more Lester Crown Today, our world diverse audiences, a step-up in the pace of task force is shaped increasingly by forces far beyond national reports and conferences, heightened visibility, increased capitals.
    [Show full text]
  • Henry Crown Jun 13, 1896 - Aug 14, 1990
    Henry Crown Jun 13, 1896 - Aug 14, 1990 SOLDIER DETAILS HIGHEST RANK: Colonel DIVISION: Army, Corps of Engineers THEATER OF OPERATION: American Henry SERVED: Dec 23, 1942 - Sep 15, 1945 Crown MILITARY HONORS: His wartime efforts earned Army him the Legion of Merit for 'his unusual ability, resourcefulness, and loyal devotion...and for materially aiding the nation’s war effort.' The French and Greek governments also honored him. BIOGRAPHY In the ranking of America’s legendary business leaders, Henry Crown, an unassuming man of moderate height and build, stands as tall as the Empire State Building which he once owned. No one, and nothing, could keep him down. This creator of vast empires of factories and machines and jobs and wealth was the son of a Russian street peddler. He left school in the eighth grade to deliver groceries. At the height of his powers he ate at the table of presidents, and yet every day he nurtured his lifelong friendships. During a career that spanned this century and culminated in his control of General Dynamics, he became one of this country’s greatest philanthropists. He sat in the most powerful boardrooms in America, and he knew his employees by name and cared about them like family. Henry Crown controlled interests in American industry worth billions of dollars, but the stocks and bonds that were closest to his heart were character, principles, strongly held beliefs, high moral values, honor and integrity. When he died in 1990 at the age of 94, he left a legacy of greatness and goodness hardly matched in the history of corporate America.
    [Show full text]
  • Jpmorgan Gave Risk Oversight to Museum Head Bloomberg Businessweek Dawn Kopecki and Max Abelson May 24, 2012
    JPMorgan Gave Risk Oversight to Museum Head Bloomberg Businessweek Dawn Kopecki and Max Abelson May 24, 2012 The three directors who oversee risk at JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) include a museum head who sat on American International Group Inc.’s governance committee in 2008, the grandson of a billionaire and the chief executive officer of a company that makes flight controls and work boots. What the risk committee of the biggest U.S. lender lacks, and what the five next largest competitors have, are directors who worked at a bank or as financial risk managers. The only member with any Wall Street experience, James Crown, hasn’t been employed in the industry for more than 25 years. “It seems hard to believe that this is good enough,” said Anat Admati, a professor of finance at Stanford University who studies corporate governance. “It’s a massive task to watch the risk of JPMorgan.” The bank has been under siege since CEO Jamie Dimon said May 10 that the firm’s chief investment office suffered a $2 billion loss trading credit derivatives. He later called it “a Risk 101 mistake.” Shares of the New York-based company have fallen 17 percent since, and at least half a dozen agencies, including the U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission, are investigating. The probes began after traders in the London office, which manages the bank’s excess cash, made wrong-way bets on illiquid credit derivatives, some of them so large they distorted market prices. Dimon transformed the division under Ina Drew, who resigned over the losses, from a sleepy haven for traders of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Silver Spoon Oligarchs
    CO-AUTHORS Chuck Collins is director of the Program on Inequality and the Common Good at the Institute for Policy Studies where he coedits Inequality.org. He is author of the new book The Wealth Hoarders: How Billionaires Pay Millions to Hide Trillions. Joe Fitzgerald is a research associate with the IPS Program on Inequality and the Common Good. Helen Flannery is director of research for the IPS Charity Reform Initiative, a project of the IPS Program on Inequality. She is co-author of a number of IPS reports including Gilded Giving 2020. Omar Ocampo is researcher at the IPS Program on Inequality and the Common Good and co-author of a number of reports, including Billionaire Bonanza 2020. Sophia Paslaski is a researcher and communications specialist at the IPS Program on Inequality and the Common Good. Kalena Thomhave is a researcher with the Program on Inequality and the Common Good at the Institute for Policy Studies. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors wish to thank Sarah Gertler for her cover design and graphics. Thanks to the Forbes Wealth Research Team, led by Kerry Dolan, for their foundational wealth research. And thanks to Jason Cluggish for using his programming skills to help us retrieve private foundation tax data from the IRS. THE INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES The Institute for Policy Studies (www.ips-dc.org) is a multi-issue research center that has been conducting path-breaking research on inequality for more than 20 years. The IPS Program on Inequality and the Common Good was founded in 2006 to draw attention to the growing dangers of concentrated wealth and power, and to advocate policies and practices to reverse extreme inequalities in income, wealth, and opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Report Silver Spoon Oligarchs
    CO-AUTHORS Chuck Collins is director of the Program on Inequality and the Common Good at the Institute for Policy Studies where he coedits Inequality.org. He is author of the new book The Wealth Hoarders: How Billionaires Pay Millions to Hide Trillions. Joe Fitzgerald is a research associate with the IPS Program on Inequality and the Common Good. Helen Flannery is director of research for the IPS Charity Reform Initiative, a project of the IPS Program on Inequality. She is co-author of a number of IPS reports including Gilded Giving 2020. Omar Ocampo is researcher at the IPS Program on Inequality and the Common Good and co-author of a number of reports, including Billionaire Bonanza 2020. Sophia Paslaski is a researcher and communications specialist at the IPS Program on Inequality and the Common Good. Kalena Thomhave is a researcher with the Program on Inequality and the Common Good at the Institute for Policy Studies. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors wish to thank Sarah Gertler for her cover design and graphics. Thanks to the Forbes Wealth Research Team, led by Kerry Dolan, for their foundational wealth research. And thanks to Jason Cluggish for using his programming skills to help us retrieve private foundation tax data from the IRS. THE INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES The Institute for Policy Studies (www.ips-dc.org) is a multi-issue research center that has been conducting path-breaking research on inequality for more than 20 years. The IPS Program on Inequality and the Common Good was founded in 2006 to draw attention to the growing dangers of concentrated wealth and power, and to advocate policies and practices to reverse extreme inequalities in income, wealth, and opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Gala Program.Pdf
    The Civic Federation 2004 Awards Luncheon Wednesday, March 24 Westin River North, Chicago A message from Kevork M. Derderian Chairman of the Board of Directors It is my great pleasure to welcome you to The Civic Federation’s 2004 Annual Awards Luncheon. This year’s award recipients are shining examples of how business leaders who are committed to civic involvement can improve the quality of life for everyone in the Chicago metropolitan area. Lester Crown personifies the qualities of recipients of the Lyman J. Gage Award for Outstanding Civic Contribution by an Individual. He is known in equal measure as one of the region’s foremost businessmen and as one of the most prolific contributors to the region’s philanthropic and civic endeavors. His role as chairman of Henry Crown and Company usually takes second place in the public mind to his dedication to making Chicago a better place for all of us. This year’s Addams-Palmer Award goes to Exelon Corporation. Exelon’s dedication to Chicago is evident from its efforts to encourage the development of self-sustaining and environmentally friendly communities and its many partnerships with the City of Chicago’s parks and schools. Today’s luncheon would not have been possible if not for the willingness of the event’s Co- Chairmen to help organize it. Therefore, on behalf of the Federation’s members and Board of Directors, I would like to extend our warmest thanks to Norman R. Bobins, W. James Farrell, and Andrew J. McKenna. All three of these outstanding businessmen have given a great deal of their time and attention to assisting The Civic Federation and so many other organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL DYNAMICS Strength on Your Side
    GENERAL DYNAMICS Strength on Your Side Annual Report 2004 Contents 2004 Financial Highlights 1 Letter to Shareholders 2 Information Systems and 8 Technology Combat Systems 10 Marine Systems 12 Aerospace 14 Financial Information 16 Directors and Officers inside back cover Corporate Information inside back cover On the cover: Between 1955 and 1965, General Dynamics commissioned Swiss-born artist Erik Nitsche (1908-98) to produce four series of posters to promote “the spirit of dis- covery” that inspired the company’s diverse business interests. The Nitsche posters are considered prime representations of the “Atomic Style” of industrial design. The 2004 Annual Report cover design mirrors the arrangement of a poster display at General Dynamics headquarters. Financial Highlights (Dollars in millions, except per share and employee amounts) 2004 2003 2002 Summary of Operations Net Sales $ 19,178 16,369 13,680 Operating Earnings 1,941 1,445 1,567 Earnings from Continuing Operations, Net of Tax 1,203 982 1,040 Discontinued Operations 24 22 (123) Net Earnings 1,227 1,004 917 Diluted Earnings Per Share Continuing Operations 5.97 4.93 5.13 Discontinued Operations 0.12 0.11 (0.61) Net Earnings 6.09 5.04 4.52 Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities 1,802 1,723 1,122 Capital Expenditures 266 222 262 Research and Development Company Sponsored 329 279 251 Customer Sponsored 194 229 134 Total 523 508 385 At Year End Total Backlog $ 42,074 40,645 28,745 Shareholders' Equity 7,189 5,921 5,199 Total Assets 17,544 16,183 11,731 Outstanding Shares of Common Stock 201,033,153 197,966,192 200,993,102 Number of Employees 70,200 65,600 53,400 Sales Per Employee $ 282,800 275,700 259,200 This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements that are contracts due to unilateral government action; differences in anticipat- based on management’s expectations, estimates, projections and ed and actual program performance, including the ability to perform assumptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Chief Executive Leadership Institute Honors Lester Crown with Lifetime of Leadership Award
    Chief Executive Leadership Institute Honors Lester Crown with Lifetime of Leadership Award June 3, 2021 — Lester Crown, Chairman Emeritus of Henry Crown and Company, will accept the Lifetime of Leadership award of the Yale Chief Executive Leadership Institute today during the virtual Yale CEO Summit and Mayors College. The Lifetime of Leadership award will be presented to Mr. Crown by Walter Isaacson, Former Chairman & CEO, The Aspen Institute. Summit organizer Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, Senior Associate Dean for Leadership Studies at the Yale School of Management, commented: “Lester Crown is one of the most revered corporate citizens across generations, states, sectors, and continents. He is a titan of the “The Greatest Generation” of WWII business leaders. He has helped guide great enterprises and institutions through great transformations including: General Dynamics Corporation, Maytag, Alltel, The Aspen Institute, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Northwestern University, the Ann & Robert H. Lure Children’s Hospital of Chicago, the Lyric Opera of Chicago, The Jerusalem Foundation, and The Commercial Club of Chicago.” A longtime family friend, Richard Edelman of Edelman Communications commented: “Lester is a singular force. Always a role model for me growing up in Chicago. He was generous to his city and to the Jewish community. He was a power broker in a city of power. He parlayed a construction materials business into a global powerhouse via investment in General Dynamics He has passed on the business to his son Jim while keeping his hand in the day to day. He is simply the best of America as an entrepreneur, a father and a philanthropist.” The Lifetime of Leadership award celebrates those transformational leaders whose character and sustained contribution span sectors, decades, and generations with wise ambassadorial service, mentoring contributing powerfully to improve business performance, economic growth, creativity, community vitality, human understanding, national strength, and global relations.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Overview 2009 Annual Report
    2010 OVERVIEW 2009 ANNUAL REPORT www.aspeninstitute.org Blank page “Characteristic of the Aspen Institute are its approach to problems based on an analysis of the situation as a whole, its orientation toward the development of policy alternatives, its consideration for the human past and present, and its commitment to the human future.” from THE ASPEN IDEA by Sidney Hyman Policy Programs and Partnerships 9 Seminars 23 Public Programs 27 The Aspen Global Leadership Network 31 Society of Fellows 35 Selected Highlights 36 The Newly Renovated Walter Paepcke Memorial Building 37 International Partners 38 Our Locations 39 Aspen Institute Leadership 40 Policy Program Directory 41 2009 Annual Report 42 Board of Trustees 44 Donors 47 ABOUT THE Aspen InstitUTE The Aspen Institute’s mission is twofold: to foster values-based leadership, encouraging individuals to reflect on the ideals and ideas that define a good society, and to provide a neutral and balanced venue for discussing and acting on critical issues. The Institute does this primarily in four ways: • Seminars, which help participants reflect on what they think makes a good society, thereby deepening knowledge, broadening perspectives, and enhancing their capac- ity to solve the problems leaders face. • Young-leader fellowships around the globe, which bring a selected class of proven leaders together for an intense multiyear program and commitment. The Fellows become better leaders and apply their skills to significant challenges. • Policy programs, which serve as nonpartisan forums for analysis, consensus-build- ing, and problem-solving on a wide variety of issues. • Public conferences and events, which provide a commons for people to share ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Kellogg Family Business Conference
    Best Practices and New Ideas May 15–16, 2007 2007 Kellogg Family Business Conference Sponsored by Kellogg School of Management Northern Trust Corporation McDermott Will & Emery KELLOGG CENTER FOR FAMILY ENTERPRISES Professor Lloyd E. Shefsky Clinical Professor of Entrepreneurship The Center for Family Enterprises grew out of a request Founder and Co-Director, Center for Family Enterprises by a group of Kellogg M.B.A. students nine years ago [email protected] to start a club and attend a class focused on the unique aspects of owning, governing and/or managing family Professor John L. Ward businesses. The center deliberately concentrates on Clinical Professor of Family Enterprises family enterprises with a focus that includes family Co-Director, Center for Family Enterprises businesses, family foundations, family offices, family [email protected] investment companies and family wealth management. Carol Zsolnay Center Mission: Assistant Director Center for Family Enterprises • Provide thought leadership to the field of family [email protected] enterprise Dana Levit-Geraci • Contribute to the body of knowledge through cases, Center Assistant research and publications Center for Family Enterprises [email protected] • Serve student needs through courses, informal workshops, personal counsel and a resource library Center Website: www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/familyenterprises • Build a family business community among Kellogg students, faculty and alumni Phone: 847 467-7855 Fax:
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Brain Project All of the Financial and Intellectual a Range of Fields As Possible
    THE INTERNATIONAL MAGAZINE No. 3 SPRING 2013 OF SCIENCE & PEOPLE Floating with the Phytoplankton Cover Story PAGE 12 For the Love of Science The Human PAGE 36 Brain Project The Science of Fat PAGE 48 PAGE 40 Cover Story From the President fields within its scope of activity. Of physics or computer science. The great course, both ends of this spectrum – thing about this synergy is that no one and anything in between – are valid can predict where it will lead. And plans for an institute. Each provides this means that, once in a while, this both its researchers and the individuals, type of research will lead somewhere foundations and governments that completely new – to a place that was Faculty of Chemistry invest in it with a different set of not only not predicted, but never even advantages. dreamed of. Alumni Reunion Even a quick flip through the pages of But this magazine is about more than this magazine will give you some pretty just the connections our wide-ranging October 3, 2013 strong clues as to where the Weizmann approach generates. Of course we 19:00 Institute is situated along this spectrum. want to show you what we do, but our If you take a little more time, you will goal is also to strengthen a different find articles on fascinating, cutting- type of connection – that between our At the Weizmann edge research in fields from theoretical supporters and our scientists. These Institute of Science physics to personalized medicine, connections are what have enabled us from marine biology to brain research.
    [Show full text]
  • EQUITY COMMONWEALTH Two North Riverside Plaza, Suite 2100
    EQUITY COMMONWEALTH Two North Riverside Plaza, Suite 2100 Chicago, IL 60606 April 27, 2021 Dear Shareholder: You are cordially invited to the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Equity Commonwealth. The Board of Trustees will hold the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders in a virtual-only format in lieu of an in-person meeting to prioritize the health and well-being of meeting participants. At the Annual Meeting, you will be asked to (i) elect the 8 trustees named in our proxy materials to the Board of Trustees, (ii) approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers, (iii) ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021, and (iv) transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting. The accompanying Notice of the Annual Meeting describes these matters. We have elected to provide access to our proxy materials on the Internet under the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s ‘‘notice and access’’ rules, instead of mailing printed copies of those materials to each shareholder. Our proxy materials are available at www.proxyvote.com. We have sent to our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials that provides instructions on how to access our proxy materials on the Internet. Please read the enclosed information carefully before submitting your proxy. The Board of Trustees appreciates and encourages your participation in the Annual Meeting. Regardless of whether you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, it is important that your shares be represented.
    [Show full text]