The Second Annual Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Second Annual Report ISSN 1471-3349 The Renal Association UK Renal Registry The Ninth Annual Report December 2006 This report was prepared by Dr David Ansell, Professor Terry Feest, Dr Alex Hodsman, Dr Raman Rao Dr Charlie Tomson, Dr Uday Udayaraj, Dr Andrew Williams and Dr Graham Warwick in association with F Caskey, K Farrington, R Fluck, J Harper, E Lamb, M Lewis, J Macdonald, R Ravanan, D Richardson, D Thomas Editors Dr D Ansell Prof T Feest Dr C Tomson Dr AJ Williams Dr G Warwick Biostatisticians Prof D van Schalkwyk Mrs M Steenkamp Dr J Gilg Registry Registrars Dr A Hodsman Dr R Rao Dr U Udayaraj Proof reading by Mrs F Benoy-Deeney Ms H Doxford Suggested citation Ansell D, Feest TG, Tomson C, Williams AJ, Warwick G UK Renal Registry Report 2006 UK Renal Registry, Bristol, UK This report will also become available as a supplement to Nephrology Dialysis & Transplantation. The individual chapters should then be referenced by their Medline citation. Publications based on the UK Renal Registry data must include the citation as noted above and the following notice: The data reported here have been supplied by the UK Renal Registry of the Renal Association. The interpretation and reporting of these data are the responsibility of the authors and in no way should be seen as an official policy or interpretation of the UK Renal Registry or the Renal Association. The Renal Association UK Renal Registry Southmead Hospital Southmead Rd Bristol BS10 5NB UK Telephone 0117 959 5665 Fax 0117 959 5664 Email [email protected] Web site www.renalreg.org General Manager Hilary Doxford Systems Manager David Bull Clinical Data Managers Fran Benoy-Deeney Paul Dawson Programmers Matthew Brealey Andy Langdon Secretary / PA Becky Blackwell UK Renal Registry Director: Dr D Ansell Accounts: MCI Ltd The UK Renal Registry Subcommittee Chairman: Dr C Tomson Secretary: Dr E Will Members: Dr F Caskey Prof S Davies Dr R Fluck Dr J Harper Dr P Roderick Dr P Stevens Dr D Thomas Mrs N Thomas Dr A Williams Ex Officio Renal Association: Prof J Feehally (President), Dr D Goldsmith (Secretary) Prof A Rees (Management Board Chair) Dr G Bell (Executive) Dr C Winearls (Clinical Vice President) Northern Ireland: Dr D Fogarty Scotland: Dr K Simpson Wales: Dr K Donovan British Association of Paediatric Nephrology: Dr C Reid British Transplantation Society: Mr A Bakran, Dr C Dudley Association for Clinical Biochemistry: Dr E Lamb Department of Health: Mr G Lynch Royal College of Nursing: Ms A Redmond Health Commissioners: Mrs Jenny Scott National Kidney Federation (patient rep): Mr K Tupling Retired Dr R Burden, Dr D O’Donoghue, Prof T Feest, Ms T Lee, Members 2006: Dr J Woods iii Contents Chapter 1: Summary of Findings in the 2006 UK Renal Registry Report 1 Chapter 2: Introduction to the 2006 UK Renal Registry Report 3 David Ansell, Es Will and Charlie Tomson 3 Quality Improvement 3 Geographical areas covered by the UK Renal Registry 4 Future coverage by the Registry 5 Centres submitting 2006 and 2007 data 6 Completeness of returns for four important data items 6 Software and links to the Registry 8 Paediatric Renal Registry links 8 Links with other organisations 8 Commissioning of renal services and PCTs 9 The Registry and clinical governance 9 Anonymity and confidentiality 10 The ‘Health and Social Care Act 2001’: section 60 exemption 10 Support for renal services in Connecting for Health – the National Programme for IT 10 Support for renal systems managers and informatics staffs 10 Interpretation of the data within the report 11 Future potential 11 Support for Renal Specialist Registrars undertaking a non-clinical secondment 11 New data collection and analysis 11 Recent UK Renal Registry peer reviewed publications 12 Commissioned research and reports 13 Distribution of the Registry Report 13 Chapter 3: New Adult Patients Starting Renal Replacement Therapy in the UK in 2005 15 Ken Farrington, Raman Rao, Julie Gilg, David Ansell and Terry Feest 15 Summary 15 Introduction 16 Adult patients accepted for renal replacement therapy in the UK, 2005 16 Overall take-on rate 16 Local changes in acceptance rate 17 Acceptance rates of individual units 17 Geographical variation in acceptance rates in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales 19 Introduction 19 Methods 19 Results 19 Ethnicity 25 Age 27 Gender 29 Primary renal diagnosis 31 First established treatment modality 33 Survival of incident patients 37 Late referral of incident patients 37 v Methodology 37 Late referral by centre and year 38 Time referred before dialysis initiation in the 2005 incident cohort 38 Age and late referral 38 Gender and late referral 39 Ethnicity, social deprivation and late referral 39 Primary renal disease and late referral in 2005 incident cohort 40 Modality and late referral 40 Co-morbidity and late referral 40 Haemoglobin and late referral 40 Renal function at the time of starting RRT 41 eGFR and late referral 41 eGFR and age 41 Changes over time in eGFR at start of RRT 41 Chapter 4: All Patients Receiving Renal Replacement Therapy in the United Kingdom in 2005 43 Ken Farrington, Raman Rao, Retha Steenkamp, David Ansell and Terry Feest 43 Summary 43 Introduction 44 All adult patients receiving Renal Replacement Therapy in the UK, 31/12/2005 44 Prevalent patients by renal unit on 31/12/2005 45 Changes in prevalence 2000–2005 47 Local Authority prevalence 50 Standardised prevalence ratios 50 Vintage of prevalent patients 57 Age of prevalent patients 57 Gender 59 Ethnicity 60 Primary renal disease 62 Diabetes 63 Modalities of treatment 64 Haemodialysis 65 Peritoneal dialysis 67 Change in treatment modality 1997–2005 70 Survival of patients established on RRT 70 One year survival of prevalent dialysis patients 73 One year survival of prevalent dialysis patients in England, Wales and Scotland from 1997–2005 73 References 76 Chapter 5: The UK Vascular Access Survey – Follow-up Data and Repeat Survey 77 Richard Fluck, Raman Rao, Dirk van Schalkwyk, David Ansell and Terry Feest 77 Summary 77 Introduction 77 Methods 77 Vascular Access Survey 2006 77 Vascular Access Survey 2005 Follow up data and organisational data 78 Results 78 Vascular Access Survey 2006 78 Morbidity data 78 Vascular Access Survey 2005 – follow-up data 80 Data returns 80 vi Access modality at start, 6 & 12 months post commencement of renal replacement therapy 80 Transplantation and transplant waiting list 82 Patient pathway 82 Mortality and incident access and modality 84 Organisational data 84 Discussion 84 Summary and recommendations 85 Acknowledgments 85 References 86 Chapter 6: Co-morbidities in UK Patients at the Start of Renal Replacement Therapy 87 Charlie Tomson, Uday Udayaraj, Julie Gilg and David Ansell 87 Summary 87 Introduction 87 Methods 87 Results 88 Completeness of co-morbidity returns from each participating renal unit 88 Frequency of each co-morbidity condition 90 Frequency of multiple co-morbidity 90 Frequency of co-morbidity by age band 91 Frequency of co-morbidity amongst patients with diabetes 91 Age and co-morbidity in patients starting haemodialysis compared to those starting peritoneal dialysis 91 Frequency of co-morbidity by ethnic origin 92 Renal function at the time of starting RRT and co-morbidity 95 Haemoglobin concentration at the time of starting RRT and co-morbidity 96 Co-morbidity and subsequent kidney transplantation 96 Co-morbidity and subsequent survival – Introduction 97 Co-morbidity and survival within 90 days of commencing RRT 97 Co-morbidity and survival 1 year after 90 days of commencing RRT 99 Discussion 100 References 100 Chapter 7: Haemodialysis Dose and Serum Bicarbonate 103 Charlie Tomson, David Thomas, Raman Rao, Dirk van Schalkwyk and David Ansell 103 Summary 103 Introduction 103 Completeness of data 103 Dialysis dose 103 Introduction 103 Achieved URR 105 Changes in URR over time 106 Variation of achieved URR with time on dialysis 106 Commentary 106 Serum bicarbonate 110 Introduction 110 Haemodialysis 110 Peritoneal dialysis 112 Transplant 113 Commentary 113 References 114 vii Chapter 8: Management of Anaemia in Haemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis Patients 115 Donald Richardson, Alex Hodsman, Dirk van Schalkwyk, Charlie Tomson and Graham Warwick 115 Summary 115 Introduction 115 Methods 115 Haemoglobin 116 Haemoglobin of patients with CKD 116 Haemoglobin of prevalent haemodialysis patients 120 Haemoglobin of prevalent peritoneal dialysis patients 124 Haemoglobin in incident patients 125 Changes in Haemoglobin by length of time on dialysis over time 133 Factors affecting Haemoglobin 134 Completeness of serum ferritin returns for HD and PD 134 Serum ferritin 134 Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents 141 Conclusion 147 References 147 Chapter 9: Serum Calcium, Phosphate, Parathyroid Hormone, Albumin, Aluminium and Cholesterol Achievement on Replacement Therapy 149 Ed Lamb, Alex Hodsman, Dirk van Schalkwyk, David Ansell and Graham Warwick 149 Summary 149 Introduction 149 Methods 150 Serum phosphate 150 Data completeness 150 Achievement of serum phosphate 150 Identification of outliers in achievement of serum phosphate 152 Serum calcium 154 Data completeness 154 Achievement of serum calcium 154 Serum calcium  phosphate product 156 Serum parathyroid hormone 158 Data completeness 158 Achievement of serum iPTH 158 Albumin 160 Aluminium 161 Cholesterol 161 Data completeness 161 Achievement of serum cholesterol 161 References 164 Appendix for definition of prevalent cohort for biochemistry chapter 165 Definition of prevalent cohort 165 Chapter 10: Factors Which May Influence Cardiovascular Disease in Dialysis
Recommended publications
  • Clostridium Difficile Infection: How to Deal with the Problem DH INFORMATION RE ADER B OX
    Clostridium difficile infection: How to deal with the problem DH INFORMATION RE ADER B OX Policy Estates HR / Workforce Commissioning Management IM & T Planning / Finance Clinical Social Care / Partnership Working Document Purpose Best Practice Guidance Gateway Reference 9833 Title Clostridium difficile infection: How to deal with the problem Author DH and HPA Publication Date December 2008 Target Audience PCT CEs, NHS Trust CEs, SHA CEs, Care Trust CEs, Medical Directors, Directors of PH, Directors of Nursing, PCT PEC Chairs, NHS Trust Board Chairs, Special HA CEs, Directors of Infection Prevention and Control, Infection Control Teams, Health Protection Units, Chief Pharmacists Circulation List Description This guidance outlines newer evidence and approaches to delivering good infection control and environmental hygiene. It updates the 1994 guidance and takes into account a national framework for clinical governance which did not exist in 1994. Cross Ref N/A Superseded Docs Clostridium difficile Infection Prevention and Management (1994) Action Required CEs to consider with DIPCs and other colleagues Timing N/A Contact Details Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance Department of Health Room 528, Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road London SE1 8UG For Recipient's Use Front cover image: Clostridium difficile attached to intestinal cells. Reproduced courtesy of Dr Jan Hobot, Cardiff University School of Medicine. Clostridium difficile infection: How to deal with the problem Contents Foreword 1 Scope and purpose 2 Introduction 3 Why did CDI increase? 4 Approach to compiling the guidance 6 What is new in this guidance? 7 Core Guidance Key recommendations 9 Grading of recommendations 11 Summary of healthcare recommendations 12 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Four Health Systems of the United Kingdom: How Do They Compare?
    The four health systems of the United Kingdom: how do they compare? Gwyn Bevan, Marina Karanikolos, Jo Exley, Ellen Nolte, Sheelah Connolly and Nicholas Mays Source report April 2014 About this research This report is the fourth in a series dating back to 1999 which looks at how the publicly financed health care systems in the four countries of the UK have fared before and after devolution. The report was commissioned jointly by The Health Foundation and the Nuffield Trust. The research team was led by Nicholas Mays at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. The research looks at how the four national health systems compare and how they have performed in terms of quality and productivity before and after devolution. The research also examines performance in North East England, which is acknowledged to be the region that is most comparable to Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland in terms of socioeconomic and other indicators. This report, along with an accompanying summary report, data appendices, digital outputs and a short report on the history of devolution (to be published later in 2014), are available to download free of charge at www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/compare-uk-health www.health.org.uk/compareUKhealth. Acknowledgements We are grateful: to government statisticians in the four countries for guidance on sources of data, highlighting problems of comparability and for checking the data we have used; for comments on the draft report from anonymous referees and from Vernon Bogdanor, Alec Morton and Laura Schang; and for guidance on national clinical audits from Nick Black and on nursing data from Jim Buchan.
    [Show full text]
  • You Feel Like You're Nothing: the UN Study on Violence Against Children
    “YOU FEEL LIKE you’re NOTHING” The UN study on violence against children A contribution to the UN Violence Study from the Children’s Rights Alliance for England and the NSPCC 2 “YOU FEEL LIKE you’re nothing” FOREWORD ‘‘ No violence against children is justifiable; all violence against children is preventable.” These are the first words of the independent study commissioned by the United Nations Secretary-General on violence against children, presented to the General Assembly on 23 August 2006, and they are the principles on which this report is founded. The UN study describes forms of violence that no longer exist in the UK. We do not execute children, we do not beat them in schools, and we do not break children’s bodies under conditions of hazardous labour. Of course these horrors used to exist in this country, quite legally, until brave and energetic people campaigned for their abolition. We must therefore be hopeful that the same rejection of violence against children will continue around the world. There are certainly no grounds for complacency in the UK. Some of the barbarous treatment of children overseas is a direct legacy of the British Empire. This includes corporal punishment in schools, or the maintenance of the age of criminal responsibility at seven years in many ex-colonial states. Where our own country is concerned, we must feel a deep sense of shame at the violence against children revealed in this report. Living in the fifth richest country in the world, in a country that has enjoyed 200 years of social reform, children in the UK are still being killed, tortured, bullied, commercially sexually exploited, and physically and mentally scarred by violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Births and Their Outcomes by Time, Day and Year: a Retrospective Birth Cohort Data Linkage Study
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Macfarlane, A. J. ORCID: 0000-0003-0977-7214, Dattani, N., Gibson, R., Harper, G., Martin, P., Scanlon, M., Newburn, M. and Cortina-Borja, M. (2019). Births and their outcomes by time, day and year: a retrospective birth cohort data linkage study. Health Services and Delivery Research, 7(18), doi: 10.3310/hsdr07180 This is the published version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/22268/ Link to published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/hsdr07180 Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH VOLUME 7 ISSUE 18 MAY 2019 ISSN 2050-4349 Births and their outcomes by time, day and year: a retrospective birth cohort data linkage study Alison Macfarlane, Nirupa Dattani, Rod Gibson,
    [Show full text]
  • Birth Statistics: Births and Patterns of Family Building England and Wales (FM1)
    15 December 2008 Correction Notice Birth statistics: Births and patterns of family building England and Wales (FM1) FM1 No. 36 – 2007 An error relating to the title of one table has been corrected in this publication, originally released on 9 December 2008. The error in table 10.3 – Estimated average number of first live-born children: age and year of birth of woman, 1920-1992, omitted the word “first” from the table title. ONS apologises for any inconvenience caused. Issued by: National Statistics Government Buildings Cardiff Road Newport NP10 8XG Telephone Media Office 0845 604 1858 Contact Centre 0845 601 3034 Birth statistics Review of the National Statistician on births and patterns of family building in England and Wales, 2007 Laid before Parliament pursuant to Section 19 Registration Service Act 1953 Series FM1 No. 36 ISSN 0140–2587 Copyright and reproduction © Crown copyright 2008 A National Statistics publication Published with the permission of the Office for Public Sector Information (OPSI) National Statistics are produced to high professional standards set out in the National Statistics Code of Practice. They are You may use this publication (excluding logos) free of charge produced free from political influence. in any format for research, private study or internal circulation About us within an organisation providing it is used accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source The Office for National Statistics (ONS) is the executive office of publication. Where we have identified any third party copyright the UK Statistics Authority, a non-ministerial department which material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright reports directly to Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Decriminalising Abortion in the Uk the in Abortion Poli Sally Sheldon and Kaye Wellings Kaye and Sheldon Sally
    “Abortion plays a fundamental Available Open Access under Decriminalising Abortion UK the in role in women’s health but is CC-BY-NC licence. often shrouded in myth and hyperbole. This lucid and The public and parliamentary accessible text provides robust debate about UK abortion law and reliable evidence on this reform is often diverted away important issue.” from key moral and political Professor Dame Lesley Regan questions by disputes regarding DBE, MD DSc, Royal College of basic questions of fact. And all Obstetricians and Gynaecologists too often, claims of scientific ‘fact’ are ideologically driven. “This excellent book steps aside from the heat of debate What effect would Edited by Sally Sheldon and Kaye Wellings in order to provide an accurate decriminalisation be likely to account of the evidence about have on women’s health? What clinical safety, public opinion and would be the impact on the legal regulation. It provides an incidence of abortions? Would essential reference point for all decriminalisation equate to those seeking to approach the deregulation, sweeping away reform of abortion law with moral necessary restrictions on integrity.’’ dangerous or malicious conduct? Professor Sir Jonathan Montgomery, University College With each chapter written by London leading experts in the fields of medicine, law, reproductive health and social science, this book offers a concise and Sally Sheldon is Professor of authoritative account of the Law at the University of Kent and University of Technology, Sydney. evidence regarding the likely impact of decriminalisation of POLICY PRESSPOLICY & PRACT ICE Kaye Wellings is Professor of abortion in the UK. Sexual and Reproductive Health Research at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • National Confidential Inquiry Into Suicide and Homicide by People with Mental Illness
    INFORMATION The National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Homicide by People with Mental Illness THE INQUIRY IS COMMISSIONED BY THE HEALTHCARE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PARTNERSHIP (HQIP) The Mental Health Clinical Review Outcome Programme, delivered by the Inquiry, is commissioned by the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) on behalf of NHS England, NHS Wales, the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorate, the Northern Ireland Department of Health, the States of Guernsey and the States of Jersey. Sudden Unexplained Death (SUD) in mental health in-patients Copyright © 2016, re-used with the permission of the Health and Social Care Information Centre. All rights reserved. Please cite this report as: The National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Homicide by People with Mental Illness. Making Mental Health Care Safer: Annual Report and 20-year Review. October 2016. University of Manchester. Report authors: Louis Appleby, FRCPsych Director Nav Kapur, FRCPsych Head of Suicide Research Jenny Shaw, FRCPsych Head of Homicide Research Isabelle M Hunt, PhD Research Fellow Sandra Flynn, PhD Research Fellow Saied Ibrahim, PhD Research Associate Pauline Turnbull, PhD Project Manager Myrsini Gianatsi, MSc Research Assistant Su-Gwan Tham, BSc Research Assistant and all staff at the Inquiry: James Burns, Alison Baird, Cathryn Rodway, Rebecca Lowe, Philip Stones, Julie Hall, Nicola Worthington, Thabiso Nyathi, and Huma Daud. 2 Making Mental Health Care Safer Annual Report and 20-year Review, October 2016 CONTENTS Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Households and Families
    Households and families Jen Beaumont Edition No: Social Trends 41 Editor: Jen Beaumont Office for National Statistics Social Trends 41 Households and families ST 41 ISSN 2040-1620 Copyright and reproduction A National Statistics publication © Crown copyright 2011 National Statistics are produced to high professional You may re-use this information (not including logos) standards set out in the Code of Practice for Official free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms Statistics. They are produced free from political of the Open Government Licence. influence. To view this licence, go to: Not all of the statistics contained in this publication are www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government- National Statistics because it is a compilation from licence/ various data sources. or write to the Information Policy Team, The National About us Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU The Office for National Statistics email: [email protected] The Office for National Statistics (ONS) is the executive office of the UK Statistics Authority, a non-ministerial Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent department which reports directly to Parliament. ONS to: [email protected] is the UK government’s single largest statistical producer. It compiles information about the UK’s This publication is available for download at: society and economy, and provides the evidence-base www.ons.gov.uk for policy and decision-making, the allocation of resources, and public accountability. The Director- General of ONS reports directly to the National Statistician who is the Authority's Chief Executive and the Head of the Government Statistical Service.
    [Show full text]
  • United Kingdom (Uk)
    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE OF AGRICULTURE IN OECD COUNTRIES SINCE 1990: United Kingdom Country Section This country section is an extract from chapter 3 of the OECD publication (2008) Environmental Performance of Agriculture in OECD countries since 1990, which is available at the OECD website indicated below. This text should be cited as follows: OECD (2008), Environmental Performance of Agriculture in OECD countries since 1990, Paris, France A summary version of this report is published as Environmental Performance of Agriculture: At a Glance, see the OECD website which also contains the agri-environmental indicator time series database at: http://www.oecd.org/tad/env/indicators 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS OF THE COMPLETE REPORT I. HIGHLIGHTS II. BACKGROUND AND SCOPE OF THE REPORT 1. Objectives and scope 2. Data and information sources 3. Progress made since the OECD 2001 agri-environmental indicator report 4. Structure of the Report 1. OECD TRENDS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS RELATED TO AGRICULTURE SINCE 1990 1.1. Agricultural production and land 1.2. Nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus balances) 1.3. Pesticides (use and risks) 1.4. Energy (direct on-farm energy consumption) 1.5. Soil (water and wind soil erosion) 1.6. Water (water use and water quality) 1.7. Air (ammonia, methyl bromide (ozone depletion) and greenhouse gases) 1.8. Biodiversity (genetic, species, habitat) 1.9. Farm Management (nutrients, pests, soil, water, biodiversity, organic) 2. OECD PROGRESS IN DEVELOPING AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS 2.1. Introduction 2.2. Progress in Developing Agri-Environmental Indicators 2.3.
    [Show full text]