DOCSLIB.ORG

FAMILY Callorhinchidae - Plownose Chimaeras Notes: Callorhynchidae Garman, 1901:77 [Ref

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FAMILY Callorhinchidae - Plownose Chimaeras Notes: Callorhynchidae Garman, 1901:77 [Ref FAMILY Callorhinchidae - plownose chimaeras Notes: Callorhynchidae Garman, 1901:77 [ref. 1541] (family) Callorhinchus [as Callorhynchus, name must be corrected Article 32.5.3; corrected to Callorhinchidae by Goodrich 1909:176 [ref. 32502], confirmed by Nelson 2006:45 [ref. 32486]] GENUS Callorhinchus Lacepède, 1798 - elephantfishes [=Callorhinchus Lacepède [B. G. E.] (ex Gronow), 1798:400, Callorhyncus Fleming [J.], 1822:380, Callorynchus Cuvier [G.] (ex Gronow), 1816:140] Notes: [ref. 2708]. Masc. Chimaera callorynchus Linnaeus, 1758. Type by monotypy. Subsequently described from excellent description by Gronow as Callorhynchus (Cuvier 1829:382) and Callorhincus (Duméril 1806:104); unjustifiably emended (from Gronow 1754) by Agassiz 1846:60 [ref. 64] to Callirhynchus. •Valid as Callorhinchus Lacepède, 1798 -- (Nakamura et al. 1986:58 [ref. 14235], Compagno 1986:147 [5648], Paxton et al. 1989:98 [ref. 12442], Gomon et al. 1994:190 [ref. 22532] as Callorhynchus, Didier 1995:14 [ref. 22713], Paxton et al. 2006:50 [ref. 28994], Gomon 2008:147 [ref. 30616], Di Dario et al. 2011:546 [ref. 31478]). Current status: Valid as Callorhinchus Lacepède, 1798. Callorhinchidae. (Callorhyncus) [ref. 5063]. Masc. Callorhyncus antarcticus Fleming (not of Lay & Bennett 1839), 1822. Type by monotypy. Perhaps best considered an unjustified emendation of Callorhincus Lacepède; virtually no distinguishing features presented, and none for species independent of that for genus. •Synonym of Callorhinchus Lacepède, 1798. Current status: Synonym of Callorhinchus Lacepède, 1798. Callorhinchidae. (Callorynchus) [ref. 993]. Masc. Chimaera callorhynchus Linnaeus, 1758. Type by monotypy. The one included species given as "La Chimère antarctique (Chimaera callorynchus L)." •Synonym of Callorhinchus Lacepède, 1798; both being based on Gronow 1754 (pre-Linnaean). Current status: Synonym of Callorhinchus Lacepède, 1798. Callorhinchidae. Species Callorhinchus callorynchus (Linnaeus, 1758) - elephantfish [=Chimaera callorynchus Linnaeus [C.], 1758:236, Callorhynchus antarcticus Schinz [H. R.], 1822:239, Callorhynchus antarcticus Fleming [J.], 1822:380, Callorhynchus argenteus Philippi [R. A.], 1892:11, Pl. 5 (fig. 1), Callorhynchus elephantinus Bory de Saint-Vincent [J. B. G. M.], 1823:61 (v. 3, CAD-CHI), Callorhynchus elephantinus Gronow [L. T.], in Gray, 1854:15, Callorhynchus peronii Duméril [A. H. A.], 1865:694, Pl. 14 (figs. 4, 4a), Callorhynchus smythii Lay [G. T.] & Bennett [E. T.], 1839:75, Pl. 22 (fig. 3), Callorhynchus tritoris Garman [S.] 1904:271, Pl. 6 (fig. 9)] Notes: [Systema Naturae, Ed. X v. 1; ref. 2787] "In mari Aethiopico". Current status: Valid as Callorhinchus callorynchus (Linnaeus, 1758). Callorhinchidae. Distribution: Southeastern Pacific and southwestern Atlantic. Habitat: marine. (antarcticus) [Das Thierreich v. 2; ref. 3926] Current status: Synonym of Callorhinchus callorynchus (Linnaeus, 1758). Callorhinchidae. Habitat: marine. (antarcticus F) [The philosophy of zoology v. 2; ref. 5063] No locality. Current status: Synonym of Callorhinchus callorynchus (Linnaeus, 1758). Callorhinchidae. Habitat: marine. (argenteus) [Anales del Museo Nacional de Chile. Primera seccion, Zoología No. 3; ref. 22759] Chile. Current status: Synonym of Callorhinchus callorynchus (Linnaeus, 1758). Callorhinchidae. Habitat: marine. (elephantinus) [Dictionnaire Classique d'Histoire Naturelle; ref. 3853] Chile. Current status: Synonym of Callorhinchus callorynchus (Linnaeus, 1758). Callorhinchidae. Habitat: marine. (elephantinus) [Catalogue of fish collected and described by Laurence Theodore Gronow; ref. 1911] Eastern Pacific near Chile. Current status: Synonym of Callorhinchus callorynchus (Linnaeus, 1758). Callorhinchidae. Habitat: marine. (peronii) [Histoire naturelle des poissons ou ichthyologie générale v. 1; ref. 1150] Australian seas; Valparaíso, Chile. Current status: Synonym of Callorhinchus callorynchus (Linnaeus, 1758). Callorhinchidae. Habitat: marine. (smythii) [The zoology of Captain Beechey's voyage; ref. 2730] Off La Concepçion, Chile. Current status: Synonym of Callorhinchus callorynchus (Linnaeus, 1758). Callorhinchidae. Habitat: marine. (tritoris) [Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology v. 41 (no. 2); ref. 17945] Mejillones [Mexillones], Chile. Current status: Synonym of Callorhinchus callorynchus (Linnaeus, 1758). Callorhinchidae. Habitat: marine. Species Callorhinchus capensis Duméril, 1865 - Cape elephantfish [=Callorhynchus capensis Duméril [A. H. A.], 1865:695, Pl. 13 (figs. 5, 5a)] Notes: [Histoire naturelle des poissons ou ichthyologie générale v. 1; ref. 1150] Cape of Good Hope, South Africa. Current status: Valid as Callorhinchus capensis Duméril, 1865. Callorhinchidae. Distribution: Southeastern Atlantic and southwestern Indian Ocean off southern Africa. Habitat: marine. Species Callorhinchus milii Bory de Saint-Vincent, 1823 - elephantfish, ghost shark [=Callorhynchus milii Bory de Saint-Vincent [J. B. G. M.], 1823:62 (v. 3, CAD-CHI), Callorhynchus australis Owen [R.], 1854, Callorhynchus dasycaudatus Colenso [W.], 1879:299, Pl. 17 (fig. 1), Callorhynchus tasmanius Richardson [J.], 1840:29] Notes: [Dictionnaire Classique d'Histoire Naturelle; ref. 3853] May be Brunnyi Island, Tasmania, Australia. Current status: Valid as Callorhinchus milii Bory de Saint-Vincent, 1823. Callorhinchidae. Distribution: Southern Australia and New Zealand. Habitat: marine. (australis) [Descriptive catalogue of the fossil organic remains; ref. 3329] Tasmania, Australia. Current status: Synonym of Callorhinchus milii Bory de Saint-Vincent, 1823. Callorhinchidae. Habitat: marine. (dasycaudatus) [Transactions New Zealand Institute v. 11 (art. 18) (for 1878); ref. 18016] Poverty Bay, New Zealand. Current status: Synonym of Callorhinchus milii Bory de Saint-Vincent, 1823. Callorhinchidae. Habitat: marine. (tasmanius) [Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1840 (pt 8, no. 87); ref. 3733] Port Arthur, Tasmania, Australia, southwestern Pacific, ca. 43°09'S, 147°51'E; possibly also Murderer's Bay, New Zealand. Current status: Synonym of Callorhinchus milii Bory de Saint-Vincent, 1823. Callorhinchidae. Habitat: marine ******************************************************************************* Unavailable names, uncertain taxa (genera) Callorynchus Gronow [L. T.], 1763:31 [ref. 1910]. Masc. Not available, published in a rejected work on Official Index (Opinion 261). Callorhinchidae. (species) Callorhynchus antarcticus Lay [G. T.] & Bennett [E. T.], 1839:75 [The zoology of Captain Beechey's voyage; ref. 2730] Locality unknown. No types known. Minimal description. Objectively invalid; preoccupied by Callorhynchus antarcticus Fleming, 1822 and Callorhynchus antarcticus Schinz, 1822 (earliest not researched). Current status: Synonym of Callorhinchus. Callorhinchidae. Habitat: marine. Chimaera australis Shaw [G.], 1804:368, Pls. 157 (top), 158, 158+ [General zoology or systematic natural history; ref. 4015] Southern Seas. No types known. Based on Chimaera callorhynchus and other literature sources. Probably same as Callorhynchus australis Owen, 1852. If so and if Shaw's name is valid, it would have priority over Callorhinchus milii Bory de Saint-Vincent, 1823. Callorhinchidae. Habitat: marine..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transposable Elements and Teleost Migratory Behaviour
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Transposable Elements and Teleost Migratory Behaviour Elisa Carotti 1,†, Federica Carducci 1,†, Adriana Canapa 1, Marco Barucca 1,* , Samuele Greco 2 , Marco Gerdol 2 and Maria Assunta Biscotti 1 1 Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131 Ancona, Italy; [email protected] (E.C.); [email protected] (F.C.); [email protected] (A.C.); [email protected] (M.A.B.) 2 Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Via L. Giorgieri, 5-34127 Trieste, Italy; [email protected] (S.G.); [email protected] (M.G.) * Correspondence: [email protected] † Equal contribution. Abstract: Transposable elements (TEs) represent a considerable fraction of eukaryotic genomes, thereby contributing to genome size, chromosomal rearrangements, and to the generation of new coding genes or regulatory elements. An increasing number of works have reported a link between the genomic abundance of TEs and the adaptation to specific environmental conditions. Diadromy represents a fascinating feature of fish, protagonists of migratory routes between marine and fresh- water for reproduction. In this work, we investigated the genomes of 24 fish species, including 15 teleosts with a migratory behaviour. The expected higher relative abundance of DNA transposons in ray-finned fish compared with the other fish groups was not confirmed by the analysis of the dataset considered. The relative contribution of different TE types in migratory ray-finned species did not show clear differences between oceanodromous and potamodromous fish. On the contrary, a remarkable relationship between migratory behaviour and the quantitative difference reported for short interspersed nuclear (retro)elements (SINEs) emerged from the comparison between anadro- mous and catadromous species, independently from their phylogenetic position.
    [Show full text]
  • Database of Bibliography of Living/Fossil
    www.shark-references.com Version 16.01.2018 Bibliography database of living/fossil sharks, rays and chimaeras (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali) Papers of the year 2017 published by Jürgen Pollerspöck, Benediktinerring 34, 94569 Stephansposching, Germany and Nicolas Straube, Munich, Germany ISSN: 2195-6499 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32409.72801 copyright by the authors 1 please inform us about missing papers: [email protected] www.shark-references.com Version 16.01.2018 Abstract: This paper contains a collection of 817 citations (no conference abstracts) on topics related to extant and extinct Chondrichthyes (sharks, rays, and chimaeras) as well as a list of Chondrichthyan species and hosted parasites newly described in 2017. The list is the result of regular queries in numerous journals, books and online publications. It provides a complete list of publication citations as well as a database report containing rearranged subsets of the list sorted by the keyword statistics, extant and extinct genera and species descriptions from the years 2000 to 2017, list of descriptions of extinct and extant species from 2017, parasitology, reproduction, distribution, diet, conservation, and taxonomy. The paper is intended to be consulted for information. In addition, we provide data information on the geographic and depth distribution of newly described species, i.e. the type specimens from the years 1990 to 2017 in a hot spot analysis. New in this year's POTY is the subheader "biodiversity" comprising a complete list of all valid chimaeriform, selachian and batoid species, as well as a list of the top 20 most researched chondrichthyan species. Please note that the content of this paper has been compiled to the best of our abilities based on current knowledge and practice, however, possible errors cannot entirely be excluded.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Cochliodont Anterior Tooth Plate from the Mississippian of Alabama (USA) Having Implications for the Origin of Tooth Plates from Tooth Files Wayne M
    Itano and Lambert Zoological Letters (2018) 4:12 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40851-018-0097-8 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access A new cochliodont anterior tooth plate from the Mississippian of Alabama (USA) having implications for the origin of tooth plates from tooth files Wayne M. Itano1* and Lance L. Lambert2 Abstract Background: Paleozoic holocephalian tooth plates are rarely found articulated in their original positions. When they are found isolated, it is difficult to associate the small, anterior tooth plates with the larger, more posterior ones. Tooth plates are presumed to have evolved from fusion of tooth files. However, there is little fossil evidence for this hypothesis. Results: We report a tooth plate having nearly perfect bilateral symmetry from the Mississippian (Chesterian Stage) Bangor Limestone of Franklin County, Alabama, USA. The high degree of symmetry suggests that it may have occupied a symphyseal or parasymphyseal position. The tooth plate resembles Deltodopsis? bialveatus St. John and Worthen, 1883, but differs in having a sharp ridge with multiple cusps arranged along the occlusal surface of the presumed labiolingual axis, rather than a relatively smooth occlusal surface. The multicusped shape is suggestive of a fused tooth file. The middle to latest Chesterian (Serpukhovian) age is determined by conodonts found in the same bed. Conclusion: The new tooth plate is interpreted as an anterior tooth plate of a chondrichthyan fish. It is referred to Arcuodus multicuspidatus Itano and Lambert, gen. et sp. nov. Deltodopsis? bialveatus is also referred to Arcuodus. Keywords: Chondrichthyes, Cochliodontiformes, Carboniferous, Mississippian, Bangor limestone, Alabama, Conodonts Background Paleontological studies show that the elasmobranch dental Extant chondrichthyan fishes comprise two clades: the pattern of rows of tooth files, with teeth replaced in a elasmobranchs (sharks, skates, and rays) and the holoce- linguo-labial sequence has been highly conserved, since it phalians (chimaeras).
    [Show full text]
  • Intrinsic Vulnerability in the Global Fish Catch
    The following appendix accompanies the article Intrinsic vulnerability in the global fish catch William W. L. Cheung1,*, Reg Watson1, Telmo Morato1,2, Tony J. Pitcher1, Daniel Pauly1 1Fisheries Centre, The University of British Columbia, Aquatic Ecosystems Research Laboratory (AERL), 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada 2Departamento de Oceanografia e Pescas, Universidade dos Açores, 9901-862 Horta, Portugal *Email: [email protected] Marine Ecology Progress Series 333:1–12 (2007) Appendix 1. Intrinsic vulnerability index of fish taxa represented in the global catch, based on the Sea Around Us database (www.seaaroundus.org) Taxonomic Intrinsic level Taxon Common name vulnerability Family Pristidae Sawfishes 88 Squatinidae Angel sharks 80 Anarhichadidae Wolffishes 78 Carcharhinidae Requiem sharks 77 Sphyrnidae Hammerhead, bonnethead, scoophead shark 77 Macrouridae Grenadiers or rattails 75 Rajidae Skates 72 Alepocephalidae Slickheads 71 Lophiidae Goosefishes 70 Torpedinidae Electric rays 68 Belonidae Needlefishes 67 Emmelichthyidae Rovers 66 Nototheniidae Cod icefishes 65 Ophidiidae Cusk-eels 65 Trachichthyidae Slimeheads 64 Channichthyidae Crocodile icefishes 63 Myliobatidae Eagle and manta rays 63 Squalidae Dogfish sharks 62 Congridae Conger and garden eels 60 Serranidae Sea basses: groupers and fairy basslets 60 Exocoetidae Flyingfishes 59 Malacanthidae Tilefishes 58 Scorpaenidae Scorpionfishes or rockfishes 58 Polynemidae Threadfins 56 Triakidae Houndsharks 56 Istiophoridae Billfishes 55 Petromyzontidae
    [Show full text]
  • L 87 Official Journal
    ISSN 1725-2555 Official Journal L87 of the European Union Volume 52 English edition Legislation 31 March 2009 Contents I Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory REGULATIONS ★ Regulation (EC) No 216/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2009 on the submission of nominal catch statistics by Member States fishing in certain areas other than those of the North Atlantic (recast) (1) .................................................................... 1 ★ Regulation (EC) No 217/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2009 on the submission of catch and activity statistics by Member States fishing in the north-west Atlantic (recast) (1) ............................................................................................ 42 ★ Regulation (EC) No 218/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2009 on the submission of nominal catch statistics by Member States fishing in the north-east Atlantic (recast) (1) ...................................................................................................... 70 ★ Regulation (EC) No 219/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2009 adapting a number of instruments subject to the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty to Council Decision 1999/468/EC with regard to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny — Adaptation to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny — Part Two .............................. 109 ★ Regulation (EC) No 220/2009 of the European Parliament
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding Habits of the Cockfish, Callorhinchus Callorynchus (Holocephali: Callorhinchidae) from Off Northern Argentina
    Neotropical Ichthyology Original article https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-2018-0126 Feeding habits of the cockfish, Callorhinchus callorynchus (Holocephali: Callorhinchidae) from off northern Argentina Correspondence: 1,2 3 1,3 Jorge M. Roman Jorge M. Roman , Melisa A. Chierichetti , Santiago A. Barbini 1,3 [email protected] and Lorena B. Scenna The feeding habits of Callorhinchus callorynchus were investigated in coastal waters off northern Argentina. The effect of body size, seasons and regions was evaluated on female diet composition using a multiple-hypothesis modelling approach. Callorhinchus callorynchus fed mainly on bivalves (55.61% PSIRI), followed by brachyuran crabs (10.62% PSIRI) and isopods (10.13% PSIRI). Callorhinchus callorynchus females showed changes in the diet composition with increasing body size and also between seasons and regions. Further, this species is able to consume larger bivalves as it grows. Trophic level was 3.15, characterizing it as a secondary consumer. We conclude that C. callorynchus showed a behavior of crushing hard prey, mainly on bivalves, brachyuran, gastropods and anomuran crabs. Females of this species shift their diet with increasing body size and in Submitted September 21, 2018 response to seasonal and regional changes in prey abundance or distribution. Accepted December 5, 2019 by Lisa Whitenack Keywords: Chondrichthyes, Diet, Ontogenetic shifts, Southwest Atlantic, Published April 20, 2020 Trophic level. Online version ISSN 1982-0224 Print version ISSN 1679-6225 1 Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Funes 3350, B7602AYL, Mar del Plata Neotrop. Ichthyol. Argentina. (JMR) [email protected] 2 Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas, calle 526 e/ 10 y 11, La Plata, Argentina.
    [Show full text]
  • ASFIS ISSCAAP Fish List February 2007 Sorted on Scientific Name
    ASFIS ISSCAAP Fish List Sorted on Scientific Name February 2007 Scientific name English Name French name Spanish Name Code Abalistes stellaris (Bloch & Schneider 1801) Starry triggerfish AJS Abbottina rivularis (Basilewsky 1855) Chinese false gudgeon ABB Ablabys binotatus (Peters 1855) Redskinfish ABW Ablennes hians (Valenciennes 1846) Flat needlefish Orphie plate Agujón sable BAF Aborichthys elongatus Hora 1921 ABE Abralia andamanika Goodrich 1898 BLK Abralia veranyi (Rüppell 1844) Verany's enope squid Encornet de Verany Enoploluria de Verany BLJ Abraliopsis pfefferi (Verany 1837) Pfeffer's enope squid Encornet de Pfeffer Enoploluria de Pfeffer BJF Abramis brama (Linnaeus 1758) Freshwater bream Brème d'eau douce Brema común FBM Abramis spp Freshwater breams nei Brèmes d'eau douce nca Bremas nep FBR Abramites eques (Steindachner 1878) ABQ Abudefduf luridus (Cuvier 1830) Canary damsel AUU Abudefduf saxatilis (Linnaeus 1758) Sergeant-major ABU Abyssobrotula galatheae Nielsen 1977 OAG Abyssocottus elochini Taliev 1955 AEZ Abythites lepidogenys (Smith & Radcliffe 1913) AHD Acanella spp Branched bamboo coral KQL Acanthacaris caeca (A. Milne Edwards 1881) Atlantic deep-sea lobster Langoustine arganelle Cigala de fondo NTK Acanthacaris tenuimana Bate 1888 Prickly deep-sea lobster Langoustine spinuleuse Cigala raspa NHI Acanthalburnus microlepis (De Filippi 1861) Blackbrow bleak AHL Acanthaphritis barbata (Okamura & Kishida 1963) NHT Acantharchus pomotis (Baird 1855) Mud sunfish AKP Acanthaxius caespitosa (Squires 1979) Deepwater mud lobster Langouste
    [Show full text]
  • Worse Things Happen at Sea: the Welfare of Wild-Caught Fish
    [ “One of the sayings of the Holy Prophet Muhammad(s) tells us: ‘If you must kill, kill without torture’” (Animals in Islam, 2010) Worse things happen at sea: the welfare of wild-caught fish Alison Mood fishcount.org.uk 2010 Acknowledgments Many thanks to Phil Brooke and Heather Pickett for reviewing this document. Phil also helped to devise the strategy presented in this report and wrote the final chapter. Cover photo credit: OAR/National Undersea Research Program (NURP). National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/Dept of Commerce. 1 Contents Executive summary 4 Section 1: Introduction to fish welfare in commercial fishing 10 10 1 Introduction 2 Scope of this report 12 3 Fish are sentient beings 14 4 Summary of key welfare issues in commercial fishing 24 Section 2: Major fishing methods and their impact on animal welfare 25 25 5 Introduction to animal welfare aspects of fish capture 6 Trawling 26 7 Purse seining 32 8 Gill nets, tangle nets and trammel nets 40 9 Rod & line and hand line fishing 44 10 Trolling 47 11 Pole & line fishing 49 12 Long line fishing 52 13 Trapping 55 14 Harpooning 57 15 Use of live bait fish in fish capture 58 16 Summary of improving welfare during capture & landing 60 Section 3: Welfare of fish after capture 66 66 17 Processing of fish alive on landing 18 Introducing humane slaughter for wild-catch fish 68 Section 4: Reducing welfare impact by reducing numbers 70 70 19 How many fish are caught each year? 20 Reducing suffering by reducing numbers caught 73 Section 5: Towards more humane fishing 81 81 21 Better welfare improves fish quality 22 Key roles for improving welfare of wild-caught fish 84 23 Strategies for improving welfare of wild-caught fish 105 Glossary 108 Worse things happen at sea: the welfare of wild-caught fish 2 References 114 Appendix A 125 fishcount.org.uk 3 Executive summary Executive Summary 1 Introduction Perhaps the most inhumane practice of all is the use of small bait fish that are impaled alive on There is increasing scientific acceptance that fish hooks, as bait for fish such as tuna.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Ecology Progress Series 530:223
    The following supplement accompanies the article Economic incentives and overfishing: a bioeconomic vulnerability index William W. L. Cheung*, U. Rashid Sumaila *Corresponding author: [email protected] Marine Ecology Progress Series 530: 223–232 (2015) Supplement Table S1. Country level discount rate used in the analysis Country/Territory Discount rate (%) Albania 13.4 Algeria 8.0 Amer Samoa 11.9 Andaman Is 10.0 Angola 35.0 Anguilla 10.0 Antigua Barb 10.9 Argentina 8.6 Aruba 11.3 Ascension Is 10.0 Australia 6.5 Azores Is 7.0 Bahamas 5.3 Bahrain 8.1 Baker Howland Is 7.0 Bangladesh 15.1 Barbados 9.7 Belgium 3.8 Belize 14.3 Benin 10.0 Bermuda 7.0 Bosnia Herzg 10.0 Bouvet Is 7.0 Br Ind Oc Tr 7.0 Br Virgin Is 10.0 Brazil 50.0 Brunei Darsm 10.0 Country/Territory Discount rate (%) Bulgaria 9.2 Cambodia 16.9 Cameroon 16.0 Canada 8.0 Canary Is 7.0 Cape Verde 12.3 Cayman Is 7.0 Channel Is 7.0 Chile 7.8 China Main 5.9 Christmas I. 10.0 Clipperton Is 7.0 Cocos Is 10.0 Colombia 14.3 Comoros 10.8 Congo Dem Rep 16.0 Congo Rep 16.0 Cook Is. 10.0 Costa Rica 19.9 Cote d'Ivoire 10.0 Croatia 10.0 Crozet Is 7.0 Cuba 10.0 Cyprus 6.8 Denmark 7.0 Desventuradas Is 10.0 Djibouti 11.2 Dominica 9.5 Dominican Rp 19.8 East Timor 10.0 Easter Is 10.0 Ecuador 9.4 Egypt 12.8 El Salvador 10.0 Eq Guinea 16.0 Eritrea 10.0 Estonia 10.0 Faeroe Is 7.0 Falkland Is 7.0 Fiji 6.2 Finland 7.0 Fr Guiana 10.0 Fr Moz Ch Is 10.0 Country/Territory Discount rate (%) Fr Polynesia 10.0 France 4.0 Gabon 16.0 Galapagos Is 10.0 Gambia 30.9 Gaza Strip 10.0 Georgia 20.3 Germany (Baltic) 7.0 Germany (North Sea) 7.0 Ghana 10.0 Gibraltar 7.0 Greece 7.0 Greenland 7.0 Grenada 9.9 Guadeloupe 10.0 Guam 7.0 Guatemala 12.9 Guinea 10.0 GuineaBissau 10.0 Guyana 14.6 Haiti 43.8 Heard Is 7.0 Honduras 17.6 Hong Kong 7.4 Iceland 17.3 India 11.7 Indonesia 16.0 Iran 15.0 Iraq 14.1 Ireland 2.7 Isle of Man 7.0 Israel 6.9 Italy 5.8 Jamaica 17.5 Jan Mayen 7.0 Japan (Pacific Coast) 10.0 Japan (Sea of Japan) 10.0 Jarvis Is 10.0 Johnston I.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide to the Living Marine Resources of Namibia.Pdf
    FAOSPECIESIDENTIFICATIONGUIDEFORFISHERYPURPOSES ISSN 1020-6868 FIELD GUIDE TO THE LIVING MARINE RESOURCES OF NAMIBIA Food and NORAD Agriculture Organization Norwegian of Agency for the International United Nations Development FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION FIELD GUIDE FOR FISHERY PURPOSES THE LIVING MARINE RESOURCES OF NAMIBIA by G. Bianchi Institute of Marine Research P.O. Box 1870, N-5024 Bergen, Norway K.E. Carpenter Department of Biological Sciences Old Dominion University Norfolk, Virginia 23529 USA J.-P. Roux Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources P.O. Box 394 Lüderitz, Namibia F.J. Molloy Biology Departmant Faculty of Science University of Namibia Private Bag 31 Windhoek, Namibia D. Boyer and H.J. Boyer Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources P.O. Box 912 Swakopmund, Namibia With the financial support of NORAD Norwegian Agency for International Development INDEX FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS ROME, 1999 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. M-40 ISBN 92-5-104345-0 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, Publications Division, Food and Agriculture Organiztion of the United Nations, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasites of Cartilaginous Fishes (Chondrichthyes) in South Africa – a Neglected Field of Marine Science
    Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre CAS Folia Parasitologica 2019, 66: 002 doi: 10.14411/fp.2019.002 http://folia.paru.cas.cz Research article Parasites of cartilaginous fishes (Chondrichthyes) in South Africa – a neglected field of marine science Bjoern C. Schaeffner and Nico J. Smit Water Research Group, Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, Potchefstroom Campus, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa Abstract: Southern Africa is considered one of the world’s ‘hotspots’ for the diversity of cartilaginous fishes (Chondrichthyes), with currently 204 reported species. Although numerous literature records and treatises on chondrichthyan fishes are available, a paucity of information exists on the biodiversity of their parasites. Chondrichthyan fishes are parasitised by several groups of protozoan and metazoan organisms that live either permanently or temporarily on and within their hosts. Reports of parasites infecting elasmobranchs and holocephalans in South Africa are sparse and information on most parasitic groups is fragmentary or entirely lacking. Parasitic copepods constitute the best-studied group with currently 70 described species (excluding undescribed species or nomina nuda) from chondrichthyans. Given the large number of chondrichthyan species present in southern Africa, it is expected that only a mere fraction of the parasite diversity has been discovered to date and numerous species await discovery and description. This review summarises information on all groups of parasites of chondrichthyan hosts and demonstrates the current knowledge of chondrichthyan parasites in South Africa. Checklists are provided displaying the host-parasite and parasite-host data known to date. Keywords: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali, diversity, host-parasite list, parasite-host list The biogeographical realm of Temperate Southern Af- pagno et al.
    [Show full text]
  • English, CA, Galindo, HM, Grebmeier,JM, Hollowed, AB, Knowlton, N, Polovina,J, Rabalais,NN, Sydeman, WJ, and Talley, LD
    Human-induced threats to turtles, sea birds and other vulnerable species; overview, needs analysis and stakeholder identification South Africa Prepared for the Benguela Current Convention February 2017 Acknowledgement This project of the Benguela Current Convention’s ecosystem-based management programme is made possible by generous support of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Norway. …………………………………………………… Disclaimer Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessary reflect the views of the Benguela Current Convention and / or Norway. Executive Summary Fisheries and other human activities have direct and indirect impacts on the aquatic and marine ecosystems, which have resulted in growing ecosystem degradation, loss of habitat as well as inadequate management-oriented research, poor long-term monitoring and limited integrated planning of conflicting uses. The focus of this report is the human activities that can be managed and monitored in the BCC environment. The document provides a synthesis of information on human induced threats pertinent to the protection of seabirds, turtles and other vulnerable species, including reference to elasmobranchs, marine mammals and fish species. As the main thrust of the project is to update the National Plan of Action (NPOA) to curb the incidental mortality of seabirds, emphasis has been placed on providing detailed information which will assist in the compilation of the NPOA. Data and suggestions pertinent to the Penguin Biodiversity Management Plan (PMP) and Turtle Biodiversity Management Plan, both developed by the Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA) are also included. Catastrophic incidents such as oil spill disasters and the long-term impact of plastic debris also fall outside the scope of this report.
    [Show full text]