DOCSLIB.ORG

Section 4526), Or Timberland Zoned Timberland Production (As Defined by Government Code Section 51104(G))

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Section 4526), Or Timberland Zoned Timberland Production (As Defined by Government Code Section 51104(G)) 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURES 4 Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 4.1 Introduction 4.1.1 Overview and Approach This section of the Program EIR presents potential environmental impacts of the Program. An Initial Study was not prepared for the Program because Midpen decided to prepare a Program EIR from the outset of environmental review. CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(a) states that if the Lead Agency determines an EIR will be required for a project, the Lead Agency need not conduct further initial review and may begin work on the EIR. The Program would not result in significant effects for some CEQA topics. A brief discussion of these topics and why they are dismissed from further review is provided in the following section. 4.1.2 Effects Found Not to be Significant Overview This section describes the environmental resource topics for which significant effects would not occur as a result of Program implementation. The following resource topics are addressed briefly in this section and then dismissed from further analysis: Agriculture and Forestry, Energy, Land Use and Planning, Mineral Resources, Population and Housing, Public Services, and Utilities and Services Systems. Agriculture and Forestry Significance Criteria Consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Appendix G (Environmental Checklist), the Program could have a significant impact if it would: • Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use. • Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract. • Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g)). • Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Draft Program EIR for the Wildland Fire Resiliency Program ● January 2021 4-1 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURES • Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Impacts Dismissed Midpen manages approximately 6,500 acres under its current Conservation Grazing Program. Five OSPs (La Honda Creek, Russian Ridge, Purisima Creek, Skyline Ridge, and Tunitas Creek) use conservation grazing as a method of vegetation management, including fuels reduction. These OSPs are along the San Mateo coast. Midpen leases suitable agricultural lands (currently over 8,500 acres) to tenants with expertise in managing livestock for this purpose. All leases are subject to grazing management plans to ensure that priority resource management goals are being met. Approximately 7,700 acres of OSP land is in Williamson Act contracts. These contracts are within 21 OSPs (Midpen, 2019). The majority of Midpen lands are designated as “other land” by Important Farmland maps published by the California Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (California Department of Conservation, 2014a; California Department of Conservation, 2012; California Department of Conservation, 2014b). Forested lands are defined as land that can support 10 percent native tree cover of any species, including hardwoods, under natural conditions, and that allows for management of one or more forest resources, including timber, aesthetics, fish and wildlife, biodiversity, water quality, recreation, and other public benefits. Midpen lands encompass approximately 30,000 acres of forest and woodland habitat, including roughly 11,500 acres of redwood and Douglas fir associated coniferous forest and 18,500 acres of other hardwood forest and woodlands. The Program would involve expansion of vegetation management practices, implementation of prescribed fire, and installation of firefighting infrastructure (e.g., water tanks). Farmlands (primarily grazing lands) that are currently managed and leased by Midpen would not be adversely affected by the Program’s implementation as prescribed burning may improve forage quality on grazing land. Proposed activities under the WFRP would not convert or cause changes that would result in the conversion of designated farmland to non-agricultural uses, nor would the Program conflict with an existing Williamson Act contract. Implementation of the Program would involve selective, controlled removal of trees for the purpose of forest ecosystem resiliency and wildland fire management. The primary role for Midpen is the preservation and protection of forests and woodlands on its lands. Although the Program includes elements to manage forest canopy and structure, the intent is to promote robust and healthy ecosystems, not to permanently convert forest land. Implementation of the Program would not result in the substantial loss of forest land nor would it convert forestry land to non-forestry use. Farmland and forestry are not evaluated further in the Program EIR. Draft Program EIR for the Wildland Fire Resiliency Program ● January 2021 4-2 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURES Energy Significance Criteria Consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Appendix G (Environmental Checklist), the Program would have a significant impact on energy if it would: • Result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation. • Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. Impacts Dismissed Several state or local plans for renewable energy or energy efficiency apply to the Program. The Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) program was adopted by California Air Resources Board (CARB), with the goal of reducing the carbon intensity of transportation fuel in California by at least 20 percent by 2030 as compared to a 2010 baseline. The LCFS program applies to any transportation fuel sold, supplied, or offered for sale in California, except alternative fuel that is not a biomass-based or liquefied petroleum gas, and certain fuel for some specific vehicles and vessels (CARB, 2018). CARB also adopted a suite of regulations, collectively referred to as the Advanced Clean Cars program, that applies to vehicle model years 2015 through 2025 which aims to control smog and soot-causing pollutants and reduce fuel use, which in turn reduces greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (CARB, 2012). Midpen has adopted a Climate Action Plan to identify goals and strategies to reduce GHG emissions generated by Midpen activities. The Climate Action Plan calls for a 20 percent reduction from the 2016 baseline in 2022 and ultimately an 80 percent reduction by 2050. Strategies are identified to reduce GHG emissions associated with four different sectors, one of which is “vehicle fleet, equipment, and business travel,” which would apply to the vehicles and equipment used during implementation of the Program. Some of the strategies correlate to reducing energy use, primarily non-renewable fuels. Applicable strategies include switching tanks and fueling stations to renewable diesel (V1, which was completed in September 2018), acquisition and testing of new electric equipment (V4), purchasing a hybrid or electric vehicle for field offices (V6), and assessing feasibility of alternative fire response models with lower emissions (V7) (Midpen, 2018). Refer to Section 4.7: Greenhouse Gas Emissions for further description and analysis of regulations intended to reduce GHG emissions that would also correlate to energy use. The equipment and vehicles that would be used to implement Program activities would consume energy, including gas, diesel, and motor oil. The use of mechanical equipment (e.g., brushcutters, chainsaws, chippers) would increase as well as the number of passenger vehicle trips to transport crew members to the work sites. The passenger vehicles used to transport crew members to Midpen lands would consume energy as well as the trucks and vehicles within Midpen lands to transport crew members and equipment to work areas. Vehicle engines and fuel used during implementation of the Program would comply with energy reduction and efficiency requirements at the State and local level. The diesel-powered Draft Program EIR for the Wildland Fire Resiliency Program ● January 2021 4-3 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURES off-road equipment and Midpen vehicles used during Program implementation would use renewable diesel in accordance with Midpen’s Climate Action Plan. The hours of equipment use to conduct the maximum annual Program activities is estimated to increase by nearly 20 times current levels of use to conduct fuel management activities, increasing annual energy use. Fuel consumption varies by the type of vehicle or piece of equipment and the associated horsepower, the terrain, and the amount of time that it takes to conduct the activity. The annual average number of workers proposed under the Program would increase from approximately five workers per day under existing conditions to 30 workers a day, assuming maximum Program implementation. The total miles driven a year associated with worker trips, transport of workers to work areas, and trucks arriving
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Taricha Rivularis) in California Presents Conservation Challenges Author(S): Sean B
    Discovery of a New, Disjunct Population of a Narrowly Distributed Salamander (Taricha rivularis) in California Presents Conservation Challenges Author(s): Sean B. Reilly, Daniel M. Portik, Michelle S. Koo, and David B. Wake Source: Journal of Herpetology, 48(3):371-379. 2014. Published By: The Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1670/13-066 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1670/13-066 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Journal of Herpetology, Vol. 48, No. 3, 371–379, 2014 Copyright 2014 Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Discovery of a New, Disjunct Population of a Narrowly Distributed Salamander (Taricha rivularis) in California Presents Conservation Challenges 1 SEAN B. REILLY, DANIEL M. PORTIK,MICHELLE S. KOO, AND DAVID B. WAKE Museum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, 3101 Valley Life Sciences Building, Berkeley, California 94720 USA ABSTRACT.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Aquatic Amphibians and Invasive Species in the Mediterranean Coast Network, 2013 Project Report Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Monitoring Aquatic Amphibians and Invasive Species in the Mediterranean Coast Network, 2013 Project Report Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area Natural Resource Data Series NPS/MEDN/NRDS—2014/715 ON THE COVER California newt (Taricha torosa) Photograph by: National Park Service Monitoring Aquatic Amphibians and Invasive Species in the Mediterranean Coast Network, 2012 Project Report Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area Natural Resource Data Series NPS/MEDN/NRDS—2014/715 Kathleen Semple Delaney Seth P. D. Riley National Park Service 401 W. Hillcrest Dr. Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 October 2014 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed. Consequently, the initial analyses of data in this report are provisional and subject to change. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Wildfire Protection Plan Prepared By
    Santa Cruz County San Mateo County COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Prepared by: CALFIRE, San Mateo — Santa Cruz Unit The Resource Conservation District for San Mateo County and Santa Cruz County Funding provided by a National Fire Plan grant from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through the California Fire Safe Council. APRIL - 2 0 1 8 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 3 Background & Collaboration ............................................................................................... 4 The Landscape .................................................................................................................... 7 The Wildfire Problem ........................................................................................................10 Fire History Map ............................................................................................................... 13 Prioritizing Projects Across the Landscape .......................................................................14 Reducing Structural Ignitability .........................................................................................16 • Construction Methods ........................................................................................... 17 • Education .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Bulletin 2188, Chapter 7
    FieldElements Trip of5 Engineering Geology on the San Francisco Peninsula—Challenges When Dynamic Geology and Society’s Transportation Web Intersect Elements of Engineering Geology on the San Francisco Peninsula— Challenges When Dynamic Geology and Society’s Transportation Web Intersect John W. Williams Department of Geology, San José State University, Calif. Introduction The greater San Francisco Bay area currently provides living and working space for approximately 10 million residents, almost one-third of the population of California. These individuals build, live, and work in some of the most geologically dynamic terrain on the planet. Geologically, the San Francisco Bay area is bisected by the complex and active plate boundary between the North American and Pacific Plates prominently marked by the historically active San Andreas Fault. This fault, arguably the best known and most extensively studied fault in the world, was the locus of the famous 1906 San Francisco earthquake and the more recent 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. There is the great potential for property damage and loss of life from recurring large-magnitude earthquakes in this densely populated urban setting, resulting from ground shaking, ground rupture, tsunamis, ground failures, and other induced seismic failures. Moreover, other natural hazards exist, including landslides, weak foundation materials (for example, bay muds), coastal erosion, flooding, and the potential loss of mineral resources because of inappropriate land-use planning. The risk to humans and their structures will inexorably increase as the expanding San Francisco Bay area urban population continues to encroach on the more geologically unstable lands of the surrounding hills and mountains. One of the critical elements in the development of urban areas is the requirement that people and things have the ability to move or be moved from location to location.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Introduced Mosquitofish and Bullfrogs on the Threatened California Red-Legged Frog
    Effects of Introduced Mosquitofish and Bullfrogs on the Threatened California Red-Legged Frog SHARON P. LAWLER,*‡ DEBORAH DRITZ,* TERRY STRANGE,† AND MARCEL HOLYOAK* *Department of Entomology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616–8584, U.S.A. †San Joaquin County Mosquito and Vector Control District, 7759 South Airport Way, Stockton, CA 95206, U.S.A. Abstract: Exotic species have frequently caused declines of native fauna and may contribute to some cases of amphibian decline. Introductions of mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) and bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) are suspected to have caused the decline of California red-legged frogs (Rana aurora draytonii). We tested the ef- fects of mosquitofish and bullfrog tadpoles on red-legged frog tadpoles in spatially complex, speciose commu- nities. We added 720 hatchling red-legged frog tadpoles to each of 12 earthen ponds. Three ponds were con- trols, 3 were stocked with 50 bullfrog tadpoles, 3 with 8 adult mosquitofish, and 3 with 50 bullfrogs plus 8 mosquitofish. We performed tests in aquaria to determine whether red-legged frog tadpoles are preferred prey of mosquitofish. Mosquitofish fed on a mixture of equal numbers of tadpoles and either mosquitoes, Daphnia, or corixids until , 50% of prey were eaten; then we calculated whether there was disproportionate predation on tadpoles. We also recorded the activity of tadpoles in the presence and absence of mosquitofish to test whether mosquitofish interfere with tadpole foraging. Survival of red-legged frogs in the presence of bullfrog tadpoles was less than 5%; survival was 34% in control ponds. Mosquitofish did not affect red-legged frog sur- vival, even though fish became abundant (approximately 1011 per pond).
    [Show full text]
  • California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Interagency Wildlife Task Group
    California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Interagency Wildlife Task Group SIERRA NEWT Taricha sierrae Family: SALAMANDRIDAE Order: CAUDATA Class: AMPHIBIA A075 Written by: S. Morey Reviewed by: T. Papenfuss Updated by: CWHR Staff May 2013 and Dec 2018 DISTRIBUTION, ABUNDANCE, AND SEASONALITY The Sierra newt is found the length of the Sierra, primarily in the foothills; an isolated population also occurs near the headwaters of Shasta Reservoir in Shasta Co. A few populations are also known from the floor of the Central Valley. Occurs primarily in valley- foothill hardwood, valley-foothill hardwood-conifer, coastal scrub and mixed chaparral, but is also known from annual grassland and mixed conifer types. Elevation range extends from near sea level to about 1830 m (6000 ft) (Jennings and Hayes 1994). SPECIFIC HABITAT REQUIREMENTS Feeding: Postmetamorphic juveniles and terrestrial adults take earthworms, snails, slugs, sowbugs, and insects (Stebbins 1972). Adult males at breeding ponds have been shown to take the eggs and hatching larvae of their own species (Kaplan and Sherman 1980) late in the breeding season, the eggs of other amphibians and trout, as well as adult and larval aquatic insects, small crustaceans, snails, and clams (Borell 1935). Aquatic larvae eat many small aquatic organisms, especially crustaceans. Cover: Terrestrial individuals seek cover under surface objects such as rocks and logs, within hollowed out trees, or in mammal burrows, rock fissures, or human-made structures such as wells. Aquatic larvae find cover beneath submerged rocks, logs, debris, and undercut banks. Reproduction: Eggs are laid in small firm clusters on the submerged portion of emergent vegetation, on submerged vegetation, rootwads, unattached sticks, and on the underside of cobbles off the bottom.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013051082 Draft Program EIR (Distributed): July 23, 2014 Final EIR (Certified): February 24, 2015
    State Clearinghouse No.: 2013051082 Draft Program EIR (Distributed): July 23, 2014 Final EIR (Certified): February 24, 2015 City of Chino Hills Final Program EIR General Plan Update Preface This document is the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the City of Chino Hills General Plan Update. It incorporates the Draft EIR and minor revisions made to the Draft EIR in Responses to Comments received on the EIR during the public review process. Other minor corrections to the Draft EIR that have been identified by City staff also are incorporated into the Final EIR. In accordance with §15132 of the CEQA Guidelines, the Final EIR also contains in Attachment A: • Comments and recommendations received on the Draft EIR; • List of persons, organizations, and public agencies commenting on the Draft EIR. • Responses of the City, as Lead Agency, to significant environmental points raised in the review and consultation process. Attachment B of the Final EIR contains the Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) for the City of Chino Hills General Plan Update. page i City of Chino Hills Final Program EIR General Plan Update Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Summary Project Description .................................................................................................. 1 2. Summary of Project Alternatives ............................................................................................. 3 3. Summary
    [Show full text]
  • L.A.'S Newt Shows Signs of Severe Stress in Drought 20 April 2016
    L.A.'s newt shows signs of severe stress in drought 20 April 2016 although more information is needed to determine an exact cause. "I've studied these newts across California, from San Diego to Mendocino County," he said. "You see a very different picture when you look up north. They're not showing these signs of lack of nourishment or whatever may be happening." California newts spend most of the year on land, staying underground to keep cool and moist—a must for amphibians. From January to May, they emerge to breed in streams. However, if there isn't enough rain, they might not come out at all. In Southern California, the California newt — Taricha torosa — has been showing up at breeding grounds nearly 20 percent underweight on average. It is the largest native salamander species occurring in the Santa Monica Mountains. Credit: Connor Lon L.A.'s only species of newt is showing signs of severe distress, troubling researchers and raising questions about the impacts of the drought and climate change. In the southern part of the state, the California newt—Taricha torosa — has been showing up at breeding grounds nearly 20 percent The species is highly poisonous, containing the same underweight on average. The drastic change has neurotoxin as pufferfish. Credit: UCLA UCLA evolutionary biologist Gary Bucciarelli concerned. "They look really emaciated," said Bucciarelli, a The species is highly poisonous, containing the postdoctoral researcher with UCLA Institute of the same neurotoxin as pufferfish, yet it is not clear Environment and Sustainability. "You can see the how newts get their toxin.
    [Show full text]
  • Salamander Species Listed As Injurious Wildlife Under 50 CFR 16.14 Due to Risk of Salamander Chytrid Fungus Effective January 28, 2016
    Salamander Species Listed as Injurious Wildlife Under 50 CFR 16.14 Due to Risk of Salamander Chytrid Fungus Effective January 28, 2016 Effective January 28, 2016, both importation into the United States and interstate transportation between States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any territory or possession of the United States of any live or dead specimen, including parts, of these 20 genera of salamanders are prohibited, except by permit for zoological, educational, medical, or scientific purposes (in accordance with permit conditions) or by Federal agencies without a permit solely for their own use. This action is necessary to protect the interests of wildlife and wildlife resources from the introduction, establishment, and spread of the chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans into ecosystems of the United States. The listing includes all species in these 20 genera: Chioglossa, Cynops, Euproctus, Hydromantes, Hynobius, Ichthyosaura, Lissotriton, Neurergus, Notophthalmus, Onychodactylus, Paramesotriton, Plethodon, Pleurodeles, Salamandra, Salamandrella, Salamandrina, Siren, Taricha, Triturus, and Tylototriton The species are: (1) Chioglossa lusitanica (golden striped salamander). (2) Cynops chenggongensis (Chenggong fire-bellied newt). (3) Cynops cyanurus (blue-tailed fire-bellied newt). (4) Cynops ensicauda (sword-tailed newt). (5) Cynops fudingensis (Fuding fire-bellied newt). (6) Cynops glaucus (bluish grey newt, Huilan Rongyuan). (7) Cynops orientalis (Oriental fire belly newt, Oriental fire-bellied newt). (8) Cynops orphicus (no common name). (9) Cynops pyrrhogaster (Japanese newt, Japanese fire-bellied newt). (10) Cynops wolterstorffi (Kunming Lake newt). (11) Euproctus montanus (Corsican brook salamander). (12) Euproctus platycephalus (Sardinian brook salamander). (13) Hydromantes ambrosii (Ambrosi salamander). (14) Hydromantes brunus (limestone salamander). (15) Hydromantes flavus (Mount Albo cave salamander).
    [Show full text]
  • La Peninsula Spring 2018
    Spring 2018 LaThe Journal of the SanPeninsula Mateo County Historical Association, Volume xlvi, No. 1 Water for San Francisco Our Vision Table of Contents To discover the past and imagine the future. San Mateo County and San Francisco’s Search for Water ............................... 3 by Mitchell P. Postel Our Mission William Bowers Bourn II: To inspire wonder and President of Spring Valley Water Company and Builder of Filoli ....................... 10 by Joanne Garrison discovery of the cultural and natural history of San Images of Building Crystal Springs Dam........................................................... 13 Mateo County. Accredited By the American Alliance of Museums. The San Mateo County Historical Association Board of Directors Barbara Pierce, Chairwoman; Mark Jamison, Vice Chairman; John Blake, Secretary; Christine Williams, Treasurer; Jennifer Acheson; Thomas Ames; Alpio Barbara; Keith Bautista; Sandra McLellan Behling; Elaine Breeze; Chonita E. Cleary; Tracy De Leuw; The San Mateo County Shawn DeLuna; Dee Eva; Ted Everett; Greg Galli; Tania Gaspar; John LaTorra; Emmet Historical Association W. MacCorkle; Olivia Garcia Martinez; Rick Mayerson; Karen S. McCown; Gene Mullin; Mike Paioni; John Shroyer; Bill Stronck; Ellen Ulrich; Joseph Welch III; Darlynne Wood operates the San Mateo and Mitchell P. Postel, President. County History Museum and Archives at the old San President’s Advisory Board Mateo County Courthouse Albert A. Acena; Arthur H. Bredenbeck; David Canepa; John Clinton; T. Jack Foster, Jr.; located in Redwood City, Umang Gupta; Douglas Keyston; Greg Munks; Patrick Ryan; Cynthia L. Schreurs and California, and administers John Schrup. two county historical sites, Leadership Council the Sanchez Adobe in Arjun Gupta, Arjun Gupta Community Foundation; Paul Barulich, Barulich Dugoni Law Pacifica and the Woodside Group Inc; Tracey De Leuw, DPR Construction; Jenny Johnson, Franklin Templeton Store in Woodside.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Introduction to California Newts
    A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO CALIFORNIA NEWTS CDA2A71D93BB.html Oct 10, 2019 The Pacific Newts Genus Taricha California Newt Taricha torosa Rough-skinned Newt Taricha granulosa Red-bellied newt Taricha rivularis (note all dark eye) Sierra Newt Taricha sierrae Newt Life Cycle: What makes a newt a newt? (Newts are a type of salamander) “Typical” Newt life cycle: Pacific Newts are exceptional! Newts are VERY poisonous ~2,000 mice killed by 1 California Newt ~20,000 mice killed by 1 Rough-skinned Newt Rough-skinned Newt California Newt •Eyes don’t protrude past head outline •Eyes protrude past head outline •Dark around eyes •Light around eyes California Newt Life Cycle Terrestrial life – not much information on this phase May move 3 or more miles from breeding site. Breeding Behavior • Males migrate to bodies of water before females – Wait for females – Spend extended time in water • Male physical changes – Vent swells – Skin becomes smooth – Tail becomes laterally flattened – Limbs swell – Toes become more rough Eggs Rough-skinned Newt egg California Newt eggs California Newt laying Eggs Rough-skinned vs. California • More likely in streams in • More likely in ponds in forests grassland • Eggs laid singly • Eggs laid in clusters • Slow development • Quick development of egg and larvae of egg and larvae • Un-striped larvae • Striped larvae Larval Stage Duration varies greatly Only stage without toxic protection Metamorphosis and upland migration So, when are newts on the move? 1.Metamorphs move upland. Midsummer – Fall 2.Adults move to breeding sites. Fall – winter (Males may move annually, females every 2 – 3 years) 3.Post breeding adults return to upland habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D: Recreation and Education Report Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve Space Ridge Open Skyline
    TAB1 Appendix D TAB2 TAB3 Liv Ames TAB4 TAB5 TAB6 Appendix D: Recreation and Education Report Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve Space Ridge Open Skyline TAB7 Appendix D-1: Vision Plan Existing Conditions for Access, Recreation and Environmental Education Prepared for: Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 330 Distel Circle, Los Altos, CA 94022 October 2013 Prepared by: Randy Anderson, Alta Planning + Design Appendix D: Recreation and Education Report CONTENTS Existing Access, Recreation and Environmental Education Opportunities by Subregion ........... 3 About the Subregions ............................................................................................................ 3 Subregion: North San Mateo County Coast ................................................................................... 5 Subregion: South San Mateo County Coast ................................................................................... 8 Subregion: Central Coastal Mountains ....................................................................................... 10 Subregion: Skyline Ridge ....................................................................................................... 12 Subregion: Peninsula Foothills ................................................................................................ 15 Subregion: San Francisco Baylands ........................................................................................... 18 Subregion: South Bay Foothills ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]