DOCSLIB.ORG

2013051082 Draft Program EIR (Distributed): July 23, 2014 Final EIR (Certified): February 24, 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2013051082 Draft Program EIR (Distributed): July 23, 2014 Final EIR (Certified): February 24, 2015 State Clearinghouse No.: 2013051082 Draft Program EIR (Distributed): July 23, 2014 Final EIR (Certified): February 24, 2015 City of Chino Hills Final Program EIR General Plan Update Preface This document is the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the City of Chino Hills General Plan Update. It incorporates the Draft EIR and minor revisions made to the Draft EIR in Responses to Comments received on the EIR during the public review process. Other minor corrections to the Draft EIR that have been identified by City staff also are incorporated into the Final EIR. In accordance with §15132 of the CEQA Guidelines, the Final EIR also contains in Attachment A: • Comments and recommendations received on the Draft EIR; • List of persons, organizations, and public agencies commenting on the Draft EIR. • Responses of the City, as Lead Agency, to significant environmental points raised in the review and consultation process. Attachment B of the Final EIR contains the Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) for the City of Chino Hills General Plan Update. page i City of Chino Hills Final Program EIR General Plan Update Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Summary Project Description .................................................................................................. 1 2. Summary of Project Alternatives ............................................................................................. 3 3. Summary Classification of Environmental Impacts ................................................................... 3 4. Areas of Controversy .............................................................................................................. 3 5. Issues to be Resolved ............................................................................................................. 5 6. Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures ........................................................................ 6 7. Matrix of Mitigation Measures ................................................................................................. 7 Chapter 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Purpose .............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Scope of the EIR .................................................................................................................. 1-2 1.3 Lead Agency ....................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.4 Intended Uses of the EIR ..................................................................................................... 1-3 1.5 EIR Process ......................................................................................................................... 1-4 1.6 Mitigation Monitoring Program ........................................................................................... 1-4 1.7 Document Organization ...................................................................................................... 1-4 Chapter 2. Project Description .............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Project Location .................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Project Background ............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.3 Statement of Objectives ...................................................................................................... 2-2 2.4 Project Components ........................................................................................................... 2-3 2.5 General Plan Update Goals .................................................................................................. 2-5 2.6 General Plan Update Land Use and Circulation Plans ........................................................... 2-6 2.7 Zoning Map ...................................................................................................................... 2-13 2.8 Public Actions and Approvals Required ............................................................................. 2-13 Chapter 3. Existing Setting ................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Existing General Plan .......................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Existing Land Uses .............................................................................................................. 3-3 3.3 Existing Zoning Map ........................................................................................................... 3-3 3.4 Existing Transportation ...................................................................................................... 3-6 3.5 Existing Infrastructure ........................................................................................................ 3-6 3.6 Existing Geology and Seismicity .......................................................................................... 3-6 3.7 Existing Biological Resources .............................................................................................. 3-6 3.8 Existing Cultural Resources................................................................................................. 3-7 3.9 Cumulative Impacts Setting ................................................................................................. 3-8 Chapter 4. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures .................................................... 4-1 4.1 Land Use and Planning ........................................................................................................ 4-1 4.2 Aesthetics ......................................................................................................................... 4-23 4.3 Air Quality ........................................................................................................................ 4-31 4.4 Biological Resources ......................................................................................................... 4-47 4.5 Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................ 4-69 4.6 Geology and Soils ............................................................................................................. 4-83 4.7 Greenhouse Gases and Climate Change .......................................................................... 4-107 4.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ................................................................................... 4-129 page i City of Chino Hills Final Program EIR General Plan Update 4.9 Hydrology and Water Quality ........................................................................................... 4-147 4.10 Noise .............................................................................................................................. 4-167 4.11 Population and Housing .................................................................................................. 4-187 4.12 Public Services ................................................................................................................ 4-193 4.13 Recreation ...................................................................................................................... 4-205 4.14 Transportation/Traffic .................................................................................................... 4-209 4.15 Utilities and Service Systems ........................................................................................... 4-249 Chapter 5. Alternatives ......................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Purpose and Scope ............................................................................................................. 5-1 5.2 Project Objectives ............................................................................................................... 5-1 5.3 Alternatives Considered and Withdrawn from Further Consideration ................................... 5-2 5.4 Alternatives Analysis ........................................................................................................... 5-4 5.5 Environmentally Superior Alternative................................................................................. 5-11 Chapter 6. Other CEQA Considerations ................................................................................................. 6-1 6.1 Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes ................................................................... 6-1 6.2 Growth Inducing Effects ...................................................................................................... 6-2 6.3 Significant and Unavoidable Impacts ................................................................................... 6-3 6.4 Energy Conservation ........................................................................................................... 6-6 6.5 Effects Found Not to be Significant
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Taricha Rivularis) in California Presents Conservation Challenges Author(S): Sean B
    Discovery of a New, Disjunct Population of a Narrowly Distributed Salamander (Taricha rivularis) in California Presents Conservation Challenges Author(s): Sean B. Reilly, Daniel M. Portik, Michelle S. Koo, and David B. Wake Source: Journal of Herpetology, 48(3):371-379. 2014. Published By: The Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1670/13-066 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1670/13-066 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Journal of Herpetology, Vol. 48, No. 3, 371–379, 2014 Copyright 2014 Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Discovery of a New, Disjunct Population of a Narrowly Distributed Salamander (Taricha rivularis) in California Presents Conservation Challenges 1 SEAN B. REILLY, DANIEL M. PORTIK,MICHELLE S. KOO, AND DAVID B. WAKE Museum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, 3101 Valley Life Sciences Building, Berkeley, California 94720 USA ABSTRACT.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Aquatic Amphibians and Invasive Species in the Mediterranean Coast Network, 2013 Project Report Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Monitoring Aquatic Amphibians and Invasive Species in the Mediterranean Coast Network, 2013 Project Report Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area Natural Resource Data Series NPS/MEDN/NRDS—2014/715 ON THE COVER California newt (Taricha torosa) Photograph by: National Park Service Monitoring Aquatic Amphibians and Invasive Species in the Mediterranean Coast Network, 2012 Project Report Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area Natural Resource Data Series NPS/MEDN/NRDS—2014/715 Kathleen Semple Delaney Seth P. D. Riley National Park Service 401 W. Hillcrest Dr. Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 October 2014 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed. Consequently, the initial analyses of data in this report are provisional and subject to change. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Introduced Mosquitofish and Bullfrogs on the Threatened California Red-Legged Frog
    Effects of Introduced Mosquitofish and Bullfrogs on the Threatened California Red-Legged Frog SHARON P. LAWLER,*‡ DEBORAH DRITZ,* TERRY STRANGE,† AND MARCEL HOLYOAK* *Department of Entomology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616–8584, U.S.A. †San Joaquin County Mosquito and Vector Control District, 7759 South Airport Way, Stockton, CA 95206, U.S.A. Abstract: Exotic species have frequently caused declines of native fauna and may contribute to some cases of amphibian decline. Introductions of mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) and bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) are suspected to have caused the decline of California red-legged frogs (Rana aurora draytonii). We tested the ef- fects of mosquitofish and bullfrog tadpoles on red-legged frog tadpoles in spatially complex, speciose commu- nities. We added 720 hatchling red-legged frog tadpoles to each of 12 earthen ponds. Three ponds were con- trols, 3 were stocked with 50 bullfrog tadpoles, 3 with 8 adult mosquitofish, and 3 with 50 bullfrogs plus 8 mosquitofish. We performed tests in aquaria to determine whether red-legged frog tadpoles are preferred prey of mosquitofish. Mosquitofish fed on a mixture of equal numbers of tadpoles and either mosquitoes, Daphnia, or corixids until , 50% of prey were eaten; then we calculated whether there was disproportionate predation on tadpoles. We also recorded the activity of tadpoles in the presence and absence of mosquitofish to test whether mosquitofish interfere with tadpole foraging. Survival of red-legged frogs in the presence of bullfrog tadpoles was less than 5%; survival was 34% in control ponds. Mosquitofish did not affect red-legged frog sur- vival, even though fish became abundant (approximately 1011 per pond).
    [Show full text]
  • California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Interagency Wildlife Task Group
    California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Interagency Wildlife Task Group SIERRA NEWT Taricha sierrae Family: SALAMANDRIDAE Order: CAUDATA Class: AMPHIBIA A075 Written by: S. Morey Reviewed by: T. Papenfuss Updated by: CWHR Staff May 2013 and Dec 2018 DISTRIBUTION, ABUNDANCE, AND SEASONALITY The Sierra newt is found the length of the Sierra, primarily in the foothills; an isolated population also occurs near the headwaters of Shasta Reservoir in Shasta Co. A few populations are also known from the floor of the Central Valley. Occurs primarily in valley- foothill hardwood, valley-foothill hardwood-conifer, coastal scrub and mixed chaparral, but is also known from annual grassland and mixed conifer types. Elevation range extends from near sea level to about 1830 m (6000 ft) (Jennings and Hayes 1994). SPECIFIC HABITAT REQUIREMENTS Feeding: Postmetamorphic juveniles and terrestrial adults take earthworms, snails, slugs, sowbugs, and insects (Stebbins 1972). Adult males at breeding ponds have been shown to take the eggs and hatching larvae of their own species (Kaplan and Sherman 1980) late in the breeding season, the eggs of other amphibians and trout, as well as adult and larval aquatic insects, small crustaceans, snails, and clams (Borell 1935). Aquatic larvae eat many small aquatic organisms, especially crustaceans. Cover: Terrestrial individuals seek cover under surface objects such as rocks and logs, within hollowed out trees, or in mammal burrows, rock fissures, or human-made structures such as wells. Aquatic larvae find cover beneath submerged rocks, logs, debris, and undercut banks. Reproduction: Eggs are laid in small firm clusters on the submerged portion of emergent vegetation, on submerged vegetation, rootwads, unattached sticks, and on the underside of cobbles off the bottom.
    [Show full text]
  • L.A.'S Newt Shows Signs of Severe Stress in Drought 20 April 2016
    L.A.'s newt shows signs of severe stress in drought 20 April 2016 although more information is needed to determine an exact cause. "I've studied these newts across California, from San Diego to Mendocino County," he said. "You see a very different picture when you look up north. They're not showing these signs of lack of nourishment or whatever may be happening." California newts spend most of the year on land, staying underground to keep cool and moist—a must for amphibians. From January to May, they emerge to breed in streams. However, if there isn't enough rain, they might not come out at all. In Southern California, the California newt — Taricha torosa — has been showing up at breeding grounds nearly 20 percent underweight on average. It is the largest native salamander species occurring in the Santa Monica Mountains. Credit: Connor Lon L.A.'s only species of newt is showing signs of severe distress, troubling researchers and raising questions about the impacts of the drought and climate change. In the southern part of the state, the California newt—Taricha torosa — has been showing up at breeding grounds nearly 20 percent The species is highly poisonous, containing the same underweight on average. The drastic change has neurotoxin as pufferfish. Credit: UCLA UCLA evolutionary biologist Gary Bucciarelli concerned. "They look really emaciated," said Bucciarelli, a The species is highly poisonous, containing the postdoctoral researcher with UCLA Institute of the same neurotoxin as pufferfish, yet it is not clear Environment and Sustainability. "You can see the how newts get their toxin.
    [Show full text]
  • Salamander Species Listed As Injurious Wildlife Under 50 CFR 16.14 Due to Risk of Salamander Chytrid Fungus Effective January 28, 2016
    Salamander Species Listed as Injurious Wildlife Under 50 CFR 16.14 Due to Risk of Salamander Chytrid Fungus Effective January 28, 2016 Effective January 28, 2016, both importation into the United States and interstate transportation between States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any territory or possession of the United States of any live or dead specimen, including parts, of these 20 genera of salamanders are prohibited, except by permit for zoological, educational, medical, or scientific purposes (in accordance with permit conditions) or by Federal agencies without a permit solely for their own use. This action is necessary to protect the interests of wildlife and wildlife resources from the introduction, establishment, and spread of the chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans into ecosystems of the United States. The listing includes all species in these 20 genera: Chioglossa, Cynops, Euproctus, Hydromantes, Hynobius, Ichthyosaura, Lissotriton, Neurergus, Notophthalmus, Onychodactylus, Paramesotriton, Plethodon, Pleurodeles, Salamandra, Salamandrella, Salamandrina, Siren, Taricha, Triturus, and Tylototriton The species are: (1) Chioglossa lusitanica (golden striped salamander). (2) Cynops chenggongensis (Chenggong fire-bellied newt). (3) Cynops cyanurus (blue-tailed fire-bellied newt). (4) Cynops ensicauda (sword-tailed newt). (5) Cynops fudingensis (Fuding fire-bellied newt). (6) Cynops glaucus (bluish grey newt, Huilan Rongyuan). (7) Cynops orientalis (Oriental fire belly newt, Oriental fire-bellied newt). (8) Cynops orphicus (no common name). (9) Cynops pyrrhogaster (Japanese newt, Japanese fire-bellied newt). (10) Cynops wolterstorffi (Kunming Lake newt). (11) Euproctus montanus (Corsican brook salamander). (12) Euproctus platycephalus (Sardinian brook salamander). (13) Hydromantes ambrosii (Ambrosi salamander). (14) Hydromantes brunus (limestone salamander). (15) Hydromantes flavus (Mount Albo cave salamander).
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Introduction to California Newts
    A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO CALIFORNIA NEWTS CDA2A71D93BB.html Oct 10, 2019 The Pacific Newts Genus Taricha California Newt Taricha torosa Rough-skinned Newt Taricha granulosa Red-bellied newt Taricha rivularis (note all dark eye) Sierra Newt Taricha sierrae Newt Life Cycle: What makes a newt a newt? (Newts are a type of salamander) “Typical” Newt life cycle: Pacific Newts are exceptional! Newts are VERY poisonous ~2,000 mice killed by 1 California Newt ~20,000 mice killed by 1 Rough-skinned Newt Rough-skinned Newt California Newt •Eyes don’t protrude past head outline •Eyes protrude past head outline •Dark around eyes •Light around eyes California Newt Life Cycle Terrestrial life – not much information on this phase May move 3 or more miles from breeding site. Breeding Behavior • Males migrate to bodies of water before females – Wait for females – Spend extended time in water • Male physical changes – Vent swells – Skin becomes smooth – Tail becomes laterally flattened – Limbs swell – Toes become more rough Eggs Rough-skinned Newt egg California Newt eggs California Newt laying Eggs Rough-skinned vs. California • More likely in streams in • More likely in ponds in forests grassland • Eggs laid singly • Eggs laid in clusters • Slow development • Quick development of egg and larvae of egg and larvae • Un-striped larvae • Striped larvae Larval Stage Duration varies greatly Only stage without toxic protection Metamorphosis and upland migration So, when are newts on the move? 1.Metamorphs move upland. Midsummer – Fall 2.Adults move to breeding sites. Fall – winter (Males may move annually, females every 2 – 3 years) 3.Post breeding adults return to upland habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Accounts -- Animals
    SoCal Biodiversity - Animals Arboreal Salamander Amphibian SoCal Biodiversity - Animals Arboreal Salamander Amphibian Arroyo Toad Arboreal Salamander Arboreal Salamander (Aneides lugubris) Management Status Heritage Status Rank: G5N5S4 Federal: None State: None Other: Species identified as a local viability concern (Stephenson and Calcarone 1999) General Distribution Arboreal salamander occurs in yellow pine and black oak forests in the Sierra Nevada, and in coastal live oak woodlands from northern California to Baja California. The species also occurs in the foothills of the Sierra Nevada from El Dorado County to Madera County and on South Farallon, Santa Catalina, Los Coronados, and Ano Nuevo islands off the coast of California (Petranka 1998, Stebbins 1951, Stebbins 1985). Arboreal salamander occurs from sea level to an elevation of about 5,000 feet (1,520 meters) (Stebbins 1985). Distribution in the Planning Area Arboreal salamander reportedly occurs in the foothills and lower elevations of every mountain range on National Forest System lands, although it is seldom seen (Stephenson and Calcarone 1999). There are records of occurrence for this species on the Los Padres National Forest near upper San Juan Creek and on the Cleveland National Forest near Soldier Creek (USDA Forest Service file information), San Gabriel foothills east to Day Canyon, and in the San Jacinto Mountains (Goodward pers. comm.). Systematics There are four species in the genus Aneides in the western United States, three of which occur in California (Stebbins 1985). Of these three, only arboreal salamander ranges into southern California. Most of the Aneides salamanders climb (Stebbins 1985). Arboreal salamander consists of two chromosomally differentiated groups that intergrade in south and east-central Mendocino County, about 56 miles (90 kilometers) north of the San Francisco Bay region (Sessions and Kezer 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • CALIFORNIA NEWT Taricha Torosa Family: SALAMANDRIDAE Order: CAUDATA Class: AMPHIBIA A007
    California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Interagency Wildlife Task Group CALIFORNIA NEWT Taricha torosa Family: SALAMANDRIDAE Order: CAUDATA Class: AMPHIBIA A007 Written by: S. Morey Reviewed by: T. Papenfuss Edited by: R. Duke, E. C. Beedy Updated by: CWHR Program Staff, Jan 2000, Nov 2018, L. Kats & S. Sweet, Nov 2018. DISTRIBUTION, ABUNDANCE, AND SEASONALITY The California newt occurs commonly in the Coast Ranges from central Mendocino County, south to northern San Diego Co. Populations are also known from the Peninsular Ranges of San Diego Co. South to the vicinity of Boulder Creek (Stebbins 1985). It is found in the southern Sierra Nevada foothills, south of the Kaweah River. Occurs primarily in valley-foothill hardwood, valley- foothill hardwood-conifer, coastal scrub and mixed chaparral, but is also known from annual grassland and mixed conifer types. Elevation range extends from near sea level to about 1830m (6000 ft) (Jennings and Hayes 1994). Populations in the Sierra north of the Kaweah River, previously considered members of this species, are now considered Sierra Newt (T. sierrae). Coastal populations south of Monterey Bay were formerly considered T. t. torosa (Riemer 1958). Genetic work from Kuchta and Tan (2006) has shown that while the species is not evolutionary independent, it is still a distinct population because of genetic differentiation and geographic isolation. Due to habitat loss, this population is listed as a Species of Special Concern by CDFW. SPECIFIC HABITAT REQUIREMENTS Feeding: Postmetamorphic juveniles and terrestrial adults take earthworms, snails, slugs, sowbugs, and insects (Stebbins 1972). Adults at breeding ponds have been shown to take the eggs and small larvae of their own species (Kaplan and Sherman 1980), the eggs of other amphibians and trout, as well as adult and larval aquatic insects, small crustaceans, snails, and clams (Borell 1935).
    [Show full text]
  • Tetrodotoxin – Distribution and Accumulation in Aquatic Organisms, and Cases of Human Intoxication
    NAOSITE: Nagasaki University's Academic Output SITE Tetrodotoxin - Distribution and accumulation in aquatic organisms, and Title cases of human intoxication Author(s) Noguchi, Tamao; Arakawa, Osamu Citation Marine Drugs, 6(2), pp.220-242; 2008 Issue Date 2008-06 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10069/19193 Right © 2008 by the author(s). This document is downloaded at: 2018-10-31T07:58:44Z http://naosite.lb.nagasaki-u.ac.jp Mar. Drugs 2008, 6, 220-242; DOI: 10.3390/md20080011 OPEN ACCESS Marine Drugs ISSN 1660-3397 www.mdpi.org/marinedrugs Review Tetrodotoxin – Distribution and Accumulation in Aquatic Organisms, and Cases of Human Intoxication Tamao Noguchi 1,* and Osamu Arakawa 2 1 Tokyo Health Care University, 3-11-3, Setagaya, Tokyo 154-8568, Japan 2 Faculty of Fisheries, Nagasaki University, 1-14, Bunkyo-machi, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Received: 23 December 2007; in revised form: 24 March 2008 / Accepted: 8 April 2008 / Published: 28 May 2008 Abstract: Many pufferfish of the family Tetraodontidae possess a potent neurotoxin, tetrodotoxin (TTX). In marine pufferfish species, toxicity is generally high in the liver and ovary, whereas in brackish water and freshwater species, toxicity is higher in the skin. In 1964, the toxin of the California newt was identified as TTX as well, and since then TTX has been detected in a variety of other organisms. TTX is produced primarily by marine bacteria, and pufferfish accumulate TTX via the food chain that begins with these bacteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vertebrate Fauna of the San Joaquin
    Vertebrate Fauna of the San Joaquin Experimental Range, California: an annotated checklist based on 70 years of observations 2007 Kathryn L. Purcell Douglas A. Drynan Kevin M. Mazzocco Pacific Southwest Research Station U.S. Department of Agriculture - Forest Service Vertebrate Fauna of the San Joaquin Experimental Range, California: an annotated checklist based on 70 years of observations (Revised October 2007) Introduction Established in 1934, the San Joaquin Experimental Range (hereafter SJER) was California’s first Experimental Range. Many studies of wildlife species have been carried out at SJER since its inception, and it continues to provide unique opportunities for research and educational activities that create an enhanced understanding of the foothill oak woodland ecosystem of California. In cooperation with individuals and other organizations, the Pacific Southwest Research Station has participated in and encouraged studies of many basic biological subjects. Agencies and institutions that have taken part include the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Game, University of California, and California State University, Fresno. As a result of these studies and occasional observations, the wildlife species of SJER have been fairly well documented. SJER is located on 1,806 ha (4,462 ac) near the center of California in the lower Sierra Nevada foothills of Madera County. Elevations range from 213 to 518 m (700 to 1,700 ft). Winters are mild and moist; summers are hot and dry. Rainfall averages 46.7 cm (18.4 in) per year, with extremes of less than 25 and more than 76 cm (10 and more than 30 in).
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Amphibians in the Wildcat Creek Watershed
    Managing Amphibians in the Wildcat Creek Watershed Ed Culver – Fisheries Resource Analyst Joe Sullivan – Fisheries Program Manager Tammy Lim – Wildlife Resource Analyst Jakob Woodall – Fisheries Intern 2004- 2010 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2011 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2012 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2013 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2014 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2015 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2016 100 90 Scale Change! 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2017 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Historic CRLF 2013 Observations 2011 2001 Newt Treefrog Western Pond Turtle Coast Garter Snake Red- eared Slider Bullfrogs - April Bullfrogs - May Bullfrogs - June Bullfrogs - July Bullfrogs – August Fyke Netting in Lake Anza Fyke Netting in Jewel Lake Lake Anza Jewel Lake American Bullfrog – 8 sub-adult Catch American Bullfrog - tadpole 624 470 Results Largemouth Bass 112 Green Sunfish 39 Golden Shiner 16 Rainbow Trout 1 Mosquitofish 1 316 Three-spined 543 Stickleback California Newt 10 Sierran treefrog 3 Red-eared Slider 1 Western Pond Turtle 3 Red Swamp Crayfish 23 18 Botanic Garden Pond Draining Photo by L. Bittner Photo by A. Narayan Results of Botanic Garden Pond Draining • Removed 44 Bullfrogs • Collected 266 newts (safely moved to nearby settling pond) • THOUSANDS of newt sub-adults • Pond drained to ¼ capacity • Many of the Bullfrogs collected were gorging on newts Stomach Contents Stomach Contents Newt 24 Snail 26 Insect 34 Treefrog 1 Rodent 1 Empty 9 Wood Debris 3 2017 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2018 800 700 Scale Change! 600 500 400
    [Show full text]