1 Michael H. Shank Curriculum Vitae Olim Department of the History Of
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Ron Numbers Collection-- the Creationists
Register of the Ron Numbers Collection-- The Creationists Collection 178 Center for Adventist Research James White Library Andrews University Berrien Springs, Michigan 49104-1400 1992, revised 2007 Ron Numbers Collection--The Creationists (Collection 178) Scope and Content This collection contains the records used as resource material for the production of Dr. Numbers' book, The Creationists, published in 1992. This book documents the development of the creationist movement in the face of the growing tide of evolution. The bulk of the collection dates from the 20th century and covers most of the prominent, individual creationists and pro-creation groups of the late 19th and 20th century primarily in the United States, and secondarily, those in England, Australia, and Canada. Among the types of records included are photocopies of articles and other publications, theses, interview tapes and transcripts, and official publications of various denominations. One of the more valuable contributions of this collection is the large quantity of correspondence of prominent individuals. These records are all photocopies. A large section contains documentation related to Seventh-day Adventist creationists. Adventists were some of the leading figures in the creationist movement, and foremost among this group is George McCready Price. The Adventist Heritage Center holds a Price collection. The Numbers collection contributes additional correspondence and other documentation related to Price. Arrangement Ron Numbers organized this collection for the purpose of preparing his book manuscript, though the book itself is not organized in this way. Dr. Numbers suggested his original arrangement be retained. While the collection is arranged in its original order, the outline that follows may be of help to some researchers. -
Ramiz Daniz the Scientist Passed Ahead of Centuries – Nasiraddin Tusi
Ramiz Daniz Ramiz Daniz The scientist passed ahead of centuries – Nasiraddin Tusi Baku -2013 Scientific editor – the Associate Member of ANAS, Professor 1 Ramiz Daniz Eybali Mehraliyev Preface – the Associate Member of ANAS, Professor Ramiz Mammadov Scientific editor – the Associate Member of ANAS, Doctor of physics and mathematics, Academician Eyyub Guliyev Reviewers – the Associate Member of ANAS, Professor Rehim Husseinov, Associate Member of ANAS, Professor Rafig Aliyev, Professor Ajdar Agayev, senior lecturer Vidadi Bashirov Literary editor – the philologist Ganira Amirjanova Computer design – Sevinj Computer operator – Sinay Translator - Hokume Hebibova Ramiz Daniz “The scientist passed ahead of centuries – Nasiraddin Tusi”. “MM-S”, 2013, 297 p İSBN 978-9952-8230-3-5 Writing about the remarkable Azerbaijani scientist Nasiraddin Tusi, who has a great scientific heritage, is very responsible and honorable. Nasiraddin Tusi, who has a very significant place in the world encyclopedia together with well-known phenomenal scientists, is one of the most honorary personalities of our nation. It may be named precious stone of the Academy of Sciences in the East. Nasiraddin Tusi has masterpieces about mathematics, geometry, astronomy, geography and ethics and he is an inventor of a lot of unique inventions and discoveries. According to the scientist, America had been discovered hundreds of years ago. Unfortunately, most peoples don’t know this fact. I want to inform readers about Tusi’s achievements by means of this work. D 4702060103 © R.Daniz 2013 M 087-2013 2 Ramiz Daniz I’m grateful to leaders of the State Oil Company of Azerbaijan Republic for their material and moral supports for publication of the work The book has been published in accordance with the order of the “Partner” Science Development Support Social Union with the grant of the State Oil Company of Azerbaijan Republic Courageous step towards the great purpose 3 Ramiz Daniz I’m editing new work of the young writer. -
1 Big History, the Big Bang, and the Big Book: the History of Science
Big History, the Big Bang, and the Big Book: The History of Science Meets the Tradition of Christianity Course Context In the 1980s, historian David Christian embarked on a delightfully daring journey: to narrate the entire history of the world from its origins to the present. Ignoring the sacred cow of academic specialization, in which academics are only encouraged to speak about their immediate areas of intellectual concentration, Christian coined the term “Big History” to refer to the history of the cosmos in all of its fourteen-billion years of glory. Even though he was an Australian historian of Russia, with little formal training in science, Christian began teaching history in a way that no one had quite done before. As David Christian was attempting to understand the evolution of history across fourteen billion years, many conservative Christians were actively vilifying the consensus of scientists when it came to the age of the universe, the age of earth, and the origins of human life. Kenneth Ham, an Australian like David Christian who is also around the same age, is at the forefront of creationist apologetics. Ham founded the Creation Museum and he is president of a highly influential organization that teaches young-earth creationism and rejects the methodologies and assumptions of mainstream science. Who is right, David Christian or Ken Ham? And what difference does it make anyway? Course Description In Big History, the Big Bang, and the Big Book, we will explore the intersection between the history of mainstream science and the beliefs of evangelical Christianity. As we look at each of the major branches of science, we will do so with an eye toward understanding how it impacts the thought and practice of Protestant evangelicalism. -
Henry of Langenstein, His Fellow Parisian Bachelors of the Sentences, and the Academic Year 1371-1372 Monica Brinzei, Christopher Schabel
Henry of Langenstein, His Fellow Parisian Bachelors of the Sentences, and the Academic Year 1371-1372 Monica Brinzei, Christopher Schabel To cite this version: Monica Brinzei, Christopher Schabel. Henry of Langenstein, His Fellow Parisian Bachelors of the Sentences, and the Academic Year 1371-1372. Vivarium, Brill Academic Publishers, 2020. hal- 03175418 HAL Id: hal-03175418 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03175418 Submitted on 22 Mar 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. ERC-DEBATE n° 771589 Monica BRINZEI Christopher SCHABEL Henry of Langenstein, His Fellow Parisian Bachelors of the Sentences, and the Academic Year 1371-1372 Henry of Langenstein was one of most significant intellectual figures of the last third of the fourteenth century, yet a crucial date in his career is ignored in most of the specialist literature on his life and works, that of his lectures on the Sentences at Paris.1 In the scholarship that is tangential to Langenstein, the solid date of 1371-1372 has been proposed on the basis of two pieces of information: the fact that in his principia the Augustinian Denis of Modena cites Henricus de Assia as a socius, i.e., a fellow bachelor of the Sentences, and Adolar Zumkeller’s argument that Denis lectured on the Sentences at Paris in the 1371-1372 academic year. -
Accidentalism in Aristotle? Poetics and Ontology
ARCHIWUM HISTORII FILOZOFII I MYŚLI SPOŁECZNEJ • ARCHIVE OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIAL THOUGHT VOL. 61/2016 • ISSN 0066–6874 Walter Seitter Accidentalism in Aristotle? Poetics and Ontology ABSTR ACT: My reading of Aristotle’s Poetics focuses on what Aristotle calls the “mythos” of the tragedy. By “mythos” he doesn’t understand the content of the Greek tragedies: family-related stories of Orestes and Electra, of Oedipus and Antigone ... but the precise scenario constructed by the poet, id est the “plot”. And Aristotle postulates that in the plot of a well conceived tragedy the causal role not only of gods, but also of human actors should be reduced. Th e strong unity of the tragic action (praxis) should result in a close connection of the partial situations, events, turning points. In this sense the substantial agents should be ousted by the “accidents” (Aristotle calls them “pragmata”). Th is artifi cially unifi ed plot should be the “soul” of the tragedy – thus becoming a souled entity, just as a fascinating animal: a new substance. KEY WORDS: Tragedy • action • plot • agent-causality • event-causality • deus ex machina • network • artifi cial animal rom 2007 to 2010 the Viennese Hermesgruppe undertook a close reading Fof the Aristotelian Poetics: reading, discussing, noting. As a result of that work the following essay tries to show that Aristotle in this well-known little book carried out a suspension of his ontology, an ontology which grants a clear primacy of substance over accidents and other accidental modalities of being. Or did the revision of the ontological order rather inadvertently occur to him? Does the exceptional revolution concern only a very special fi eld of reality? Since 2011 we have worked on the bulwark of Aristotelian ontology: the so-called Metaphysics. -
Encountering the Enlightenment: Science, Religion, and Catholic Epistemologies Across the Spanish Atlantic, 1687-1813
Encountering the Enlightenment: Science, Religion, and Catholic Epistemologies across the Spanish Atlantic, 1687-1813 by Copyright 2016 George Alan Klaeren Submitted to the graduate degree program in History and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _______________________________ Chairperson Dr. Luis Corteguera _______________________________ Dr. Elizabeth Kuznesof _______________________________ Dr. Robert Schwaller _______________________________ Dr. Marta Vicente _______________________________ Dr. Santa Arias Date Defended: February 23, 2017 ii The Dissertation Committee for George Alan Klaeren certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Encountering the Enlightenment: Science, Religion, and Catholic Epistemologies across the Spanish Atlantic, 1687-1813 _________________________________ Chairperson Dr. Luis Corteguera Date approved: February 23, 2017 iii ABSTRACT During the eighteenth century, a wave of thought inundated the Spanish empire, introducing new knowledge in the natural sciences, religion, and philosophy, and importantly, questioning the very modes of perceiving and ascertaining this knowledge. This period of epistemic rupture in Spain and her colonies, commonly referred to as the Enlightenment, not only presented new ways of knowing, but inspired impassioned debates among leading intellectuals about the epistemology and philosophy that continued throughout the century. The previous scholarly literature -
CV Current Online 1
Curriculum Vitae Peter Harrison Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities! Forgan-Smith Building, Level 5 The University of Queensland Qld 4072 Australia Email. [email protected] Qualifications ______________________________________________________________________ DLitt 2013 University of Oxford MA 2007 University of Oxford PhD 1989 University of Queensland MA 1985 Yale University BA 1983 University of Queensland (1st Class Hons) Dip Ed 1977 University of Queensland BSc 1976 University of Queensland Career History ______________________________________________________________________ Director, Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities, University of Queensland, 2015- Australian Laureate Fellow, 2015-19 Research Professor and Director, Centre for the History of European Discourses, University of Queensland, 2011-15 Senior Research Fellow, Ian Ramsey Centre, University of Oxford, 2011- Andreas Idreos Professor of Science and Religion; Director of the Ian Ramsey Centre, Fellow of Harris Manchester College, University of Oxford, 2007-11 Assistant Professor/Associate Professor/Professor of History and Philosophy, Bond University, 1989-2006 Fellowships and Honours ______________________________________________________________________ • Bampton Lecturer (Oxford), 2019 • Corresponding member, International Academy of the History of Science • Aldersgate Prize, 2015, for The Territories of Science and Religion. • Australian Laureate Fellow, 2015-19 • Gifford Lecturer (Edinburgh),’Science, Religion and Modernity’, 6 Lectures, 2010-11 • Christ Church, Oxford. Fowler Hamilton Visiting Fellowship. 2007 (declined) • Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ. Elizabeth and J. Richardson Dilworth Fellowship, January–August, 2005 • Bruce Mansfield Prize (Religious History) 2005 • Vice-Chancellor’s Award (Research Excellence), 2004 • Centenary Medal. Australian Honours, General List, ‘For Service to Australian Society and the Humanities in the Study of Philosophy and Religion’. 2003 • Foundation member, International Society for Science and Religion. -
Study Guide for “Science & Religion”
STUDY GUIDE: HAVE SCIENCE AND RELIGION ALWAYS BEEN AT WAR? THE DRAPER-WHITE THESIS By Dr. Joshua M. Moritz VIDEO SUMMARY: There is a popular conception that the historical relationship between science and religion has always been one of conflict or even all-out warfare. Historians of science call this the “conflict thesis.” In this video, historians of science Dr. Lawrence Principe and Dr. Edward Davis examine the historical roots and social context of the conflict thesis. Principe and Davis explain that the conflict thesis can be traced primarily to the popular works of two 19th century Americans: John William Draper and Andrew Dickson White. Principe and Davis argue that Draper and White’s use of the language of “conflict” and “warfare” falls far short of the historical reality. Nevertheless, the popularity of these two works and the global influence of these two works still inform current views of how science and religion intersect. CONTRIBUTORS Dr. Lawrence M. Principe is the Drew Professor of the Humanities at Johns Hopkins University in the Department of History of Science and Technology and the Department of Chemistry. He is author of The Scientific Revolution: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2011). Dr. Edward (Ted) Davis is Professor of the History of Science at Messiah College in Mechanicsburg, PA. He is co-editor (with Michael Hunter) of The Works of Robert Boyle (Taylor & Francis, 2000). DISCUSSION QUESTIONS In this film, historian of science Dr. Lawrence Principe and Dr. Ted Davis explain that Draper and White’s views were rooted in the social and political movements of the time. -
Medieval College “Diplomas”: Determination Announcements at the University of Vienna, a Report and a Reconstruction
Medieval college \diplomas": determination announcements at the University of Vienna, a report and a reconstruction Johannes von Narrenstein John Cash [email protected] The \determination" was an essential part of life at a medieval university: a public discussion of a topic of debate (the quaestio disputat) in which an aspiring scholar presented a viewpoint and countered arguments from all comers. Such a discussion was the culmination of several years of academic study, and marked his acceptance as a bachelor of arts. While a student might have to obtain several certificates before the determination, no cer- tificates marked its successful completion. Sometimes, though, there was a determination announcement|a brief notice posted in a public place to inform scholars and students of the upcoming disputation. Five from the University of Vienna have survived, some richly decorated. In this report I will place these announcements into their historical context, and describe how I have recreated a decorated one. The medieval university in Europe The word university is derived from the Latin universitas magistrorum et scholarium, \community of teachers and scholars", and indicates its origins as a sort of guild of master and apprentice thinkers. The proper name for the instituion was studium generale. Its graduates received the ius ubique docendi, the right to teach at all other universities without further exami- nation. Boys as young as 14 (but not girls) could matriculate into a university after completing preparatory study of the trivium|grammar, rhetoric, and logic|and the quadrivium|arithmetic, geometry, music, and astronomy. These seven \liberal arts" remained the basis of six years of study in the faculty of arts, leading to the baccalaureate or bachelor's degree. -
REBIRTH, REFORM and RESILIENCE Universities in Transition 1300-1700
REBIRTH, REFORM AND RESILIENCE Universities in Transition 1300-1700 Edited by James M. Kittelson and Pamela J. Transue $25.00 REBIRTH, REFORM, AND RESILIENCE Universities in Transition, 1300-1700 Edited by James M. Kittelson and Pamela]. Transue In his Introduction to this collection of original essays, Professor Kittelson notes that the university is one of the few institutions that medieval Latin Christendom contributed directly to modern Western civilization. An export wherever else it is found, it is unique to Western culture. All cultures, to be sure, have had their intellec tuals—those men and women whose task it has been to learn, to know, and to teach. But only in Latin Christendom were scholars—the company of masters and students—found gathered together into the universitas whose entire purpose was to develop and disseminate knowledge in a continu ous and systematic fashion with little regard for the consequences of their activities. The studies in this volume treat the history of the universities from the late Middle Ages through the Reformation; that is, from the time of their secure founding, through the period in which they were posed the challenges of humanism and con fessionalism, but before the explosion of knowl edge that marked the emergence of modern science and the advent of the Enlightenment. The essays and their authors are: "University and Society on the Threshold of Modern Times: The German Connection," by Heiko A. Ober man; "The Importance of the Reformation for the Universities: Culture and Confessions in the Criti cal Years," by Lewis W. Spitz; "Science and the Medieval University," by Edward Grant; "The Role of English Thought in the Transformation of University Education in the Late Middle Ages," by William J. -
How Supporters of Evolution Encourage Violations of the Establishment Clause
ZEAL FOR DARWIN’S HOUSE CONSUMES THEM: HOW SUPPORTERS OF EVOLUTION ENCOURAGE VIOLATIONS OF THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE Casey Luskin† I. INTRODUCTION The common stereotype in the controversy over teaching evolution holds that it is the opponents of evolution who are constantly trying to “sneak religious dogma back into science education.”1 While perhaps in some instances this caricature is not entirely undeserved,2 the mainstream media and legal community pay scant attention to incidents where proponents of Darwinian evolution transgress the boundary between church and state erected by the Establishment Clause. By documenting ways that evolution advocates encourage violations of the Establishment Clause—in some instances, explicitly advocating state endorsement of pro-evolution religious viewpoints in the science classroom—this Article will show the impropriety of the common “Inherit the Wind stereotype.”3 To be sure, one area where proponents of evolution do not violate the Establishment Clause is in the mere fact that public schools teach the scientific evidence supporting neo-Darwinian evolution (evolution).4 In the foundational 1968 case Epperson v. Arkansas, not only did the U.S. Supreme Court plainly rule under the presumption that teaching evolution is † Casey Luskin, M.S., J.D., Esq. is Program Officer in Public Policy and Legal Affairs for the Discovery Institute. As an attorney with a graduate science background, he has published in GEOCHEMISTRY, GEOPHYSICS, AND GEOSYSTEMS; PROGRESS IN COMPLEXITY, INFORMATION AND DESIGN; RESEARCH NEWS AND OPPORTUNITIES IN SCIENCE AND THEOLOGY; JOURNAL OF CHURCH AND STATE; MONTANA LAW REVIEW; HAMLINE LAW REVIEW; and THE PRAEGER HANDBOOK OF RELIGION AND EDUCATION IN THE UNITED STATES (James C. -
God's Knowledge Was the Subject of Considerable Debate at the Two Most Important Western Universities of the Middle Ages, Paris and Oxford
God's knowledge was the subject of considerable debate at the two most important Western universities of the Middle Ages, Paris and Oxford. At Oxford, theologians from William of Ockham to Thomas Bradwardine devoted themselves to debates especially concerning God's knowledge of future contingent events. The influence of related Oxonian considerations or of the subtilitates anglicanae on the European continent has already been demonstrated for the University of Paris. In this project, I intend to consider the transposition of the Oxford debates to the oldest German university in Central Europe, precisely to the Faculty of Theology in Vienna, in ist early years. Indeed, much of the theological debate at Vienna entailed discussions regarding God's knowledge and related issues: Henry of Langenstein in his Genesis Commentary, Henry Totting of Oyta in Question 10 to Book I of the Sentences or disputed questions from the Faculty of Theology all examine the content and influence of God's knowledge. In these discussions, theologians at Vienna demonstrate a thorough awareness of Oxford thought on the matter, frequently citing Robert Holcot, Thomas Bradwardine or Richard FitzRalph. The period investigated covers the time from the foundation of the Theological Faculty of the University of Vienna (1384) to roughly the end of the Great Western Schism (1417). The corpus comprises the mainly manuscript scholarly writings of the first two generations of Viennese theologians – from Henry of Langenstein to Peter Czech of Pulkau – as well as anonymous and collective works conceived at the Faculty of Theology. The inquiry will thus examine (1) Bible Commentaries, (2) Commentaries on the Sentences, and (3) disputed questions.