DOCSLIB.ORG

Lecture 9. Aristotle and His Profound Influence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Lecture 9. Aristotle and his Profound Influence Figure 9.1 Aristotle (384-322 B.C.) Aristotle Unlike Socrates and Plato, Aristotle was not originally from Athens. Aristotle's father was a doctor who lived in Macedon north of Greece. When Aristotle was 18, he left to study at Plato's Academy until Plato's death, but during this time Aristotle was never chosen to be among its leaders. Soon after Plato's death, Aristotle left Athens and went to Macedon to be the tutor of the young prince Alexander, who grew up to be Alexander the Great. Alexander may not have been particularly interested in learning anything from Aristotle, but they did become friends. When Alexander grew up and became the king, Aristotle went back to Athens and opened his own school there, the Lyceum, to compete with Plato's Academy. Both schools were successful for hundreds years. Aristotle wrote on mechanics, physics, mathematics, logic, meteorology, botany, psychol- ogy, zoology, ethics, literature, metaphysics, economics, and many other fields. 57 Aristotle's influence on mathematics There is no single book written on mathematics by Aristotle but discussions of the subject occur in a variety of other books or other occasions. He said in Metaphysica 1-5 that the so-called Pythagoreans, who were the first to take up mathematics, not only advanced this subject, but saturated with it, they fancied that the principles of mathematics were the principles of all things. and that The mathematical sciences particularly exhibit order, symmetry, and limitation; and these are the greatest forms of the beautiful. His many points of view have had a profound influence on philosophical and mathematical thinking and have had a large impact on general science up to now. • Aristotle viewed the sciences as falling into three types |{ theoretical (seeking truth), productive (e.g., arts), and practical (seeking regular human actions). In the theoret- ical category, mathematics is the most exact. • Aristotle thought that mathematics ideas with abstract concepts, which are derived from properties of physical bodies. • Aristotle believed that a definition tells us what a thing is but does not assert that the thing exists. So giving a definition is not enough, one must also show a thing described by the definition exists. Leibniz gave a example: one can define a regular polyhedron with ten faces, but such a figure does not exist. The method of proving existence that Aristotle and Euclid adopted was construction: all mathematical concepts must be constructed to establish their existence. Figure 9.2 Regular polyhedron 58 • Aristotle distinguished between axioms (truths common to all sciences) and postulates (acceptable first principles for any one science). Some Aristotelian versions were taken up by Euclid. • Aristotle discussed the fundamental problem of how points and lines can be related. • Aristotle discussed infinity. • A major achievement of Aristotle was the founding of the science of logic. His ba- sic principles of logic |{ the law of contradiction, which asserts that a proposition cannot be both true and false, and the law of exclude middle, which maintains that a proposition must be either true or false |{ are the heart of the indirect method of mathematical proof. Aristotelian logic remained unchanged until the nineteenth century. • Aristotle thought that logical arguments should follow syllogisms. By syllogisms we mean that one proposition (the conclusion) is inferred from two others (the premises) of a certain form: Major premise: A general statement. Minor premise: A specific statement. Conclusion: based on the two premises. For example, Major premise: No geese are felines. Minor premise: Some birds are geese. Conclusion: Some birds are not felines. • In mathematics, he emphasized deductive proof as the sole basis for establishing facts. 59 Figure 9.3 Aristotle was the tutor of the young prince Alexander Great Writer As a great writer, Aristotle's writings presented a systematic account of his views. Aristotle's systematic treatises may be grouped in several divisions. • Logic: { Categories (10 classifications of terms). { On Interpretation (propositions, truth, modality). { Prior Analytics (syllogistic logic). { Posterior Analytics (scientific method and syllogism). { Topics (rules for effective arguments and debate). { On Sophistical Refutations (informal fallacies). • Physical works: { Physics (explains change, motion, void, time). { On the Heavens (structure of heaven, earth, elements). { On Generation (through combining material constituents). { Meteorologics (origin of comets, weather, disasters). • Psychological works: { On the Soul (explains faculties, senses, mind, imagination). 60 { On Memory, Reminiscence, Dreams, and Prophesying. • Natural history: { History of Animals (physical/mental qualities, habits). { On the parts of Animals. { On the Movement of Animals. { On the Progression of Animals. { On the Generation of Animals. { Minor treatises. { Problem. • Philosophical works: { Metaphysics (substance, cause, form, potentiality). { Nicomachean Ethics (soul, happiness, virtue, friendship). { Eudemain Ethics. { Magna Moralia. { Politics (best states, utopias, constitutions, revolutions). { Rhetoric (elements of forensic and political debate). { Poetics (tragedy, epic poetry). Aristotle's mistake Aristotle wrote too many books on many different fields, and due to the limit of scientific knowledge at his time, he sometimes made mistakes. For example, Aristotle thought that stones, apples, and other heavy objects fall down because they seek their natural place (i.e., at the center of the Earth). As they approached the ground, Aristotle argued, these bodies increased their speed because they were happy to return home. 1 Aristotle also claimed that heavier objects fall faster, and the falling speed is directly propotional to the weight of an object. More than one thousand year late, Galileo (1564-1642) found this theory was wrong. Here is Galileo's logic thought. Suppose you tie together two objects, which have different weights. On one hand, if Aristotles law was correct, the combined object should fall even faster than any of the two objects; on the other 1Is God a mathematician? Mario Livio, Simon & Schuster Paperbacks, New York-London-Toronto- Sydney, 2010, p. 42. 61 hand, since the lighter object would slow down the heavier one, the combined object should fall at some intermediate speed. This gives to a contradiction. Figure 9.4 Aristotle Remark To close this lecture, we mention Autolycus of Pitane, an astronomer and geometer, who lived around 310 B.C. He was not a member of Plato's or Aristotle's schools, though he did teach one of the leaders who succeeded Plato. Of the three books he wrote, the On the Moving Sphere presupposes theorems of spherical geometry which must have been known to the Greeks of that time. The form of the book On the Moving Spheres is significant. • Letters denote points on diagrams. • The propositions are logically ordered. • Each proposition is stated generally. • Explicit reference with the figures. • The proof of each proposition is given. This is the style Euclid uses later.2 2Morris Kline, Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times, volume 1, New York Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1972, p.54. 62.
Recommended publications
  • The Epistemic Value of 'Κατά Τόν Λόγον': Meteorology

    The Epistemic Value of 'Κατά Τόν Λόγον': Meteorology

    The epistemic value of ‘κατά τόν λόγον’: Meteorology 1.7 By Eleftheria Rotsia Dimou Submitted to Central European University Department of Philosophy In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the one year MA degree of Philosophy Supervisor: Associate Professor István Bodnár Budapest, Hungary 2018 CEU eTD Collection © Copyright by Eleftheria Rotsia Dimou, 2018 1 Τὸν μὲν οὖν Ἀναξαγόραν φασὶν ἀποκρίνασθαι πρός τινα διαποροῦντα τοιαῦτ ̓ ἄττα καὶ διερωτῶντα τίνος ἕνεκ ̓ ἄν τις ἕλοιτο γενέσθαι μᾶλλον ἢ μὴ γενέσθαι ‘τοῦ’ φάναι “θεωρῆσαι τὸν οὐρανὸν καὶ τὴν περὶ τὸν ὅλον κόσμον τάξιν”. (Aristotle, E.E Ι, 1216a12–14). CEU eTD Collection 2 Contents 1. Abstract ……………………………………………………….……4 2. Acknowledgments……………………………………..……………5 3. Introduction……………………………………………..…………..6 4. Part I: An Ontological Question…………………………...……….9 5. Part II: An Epistemological Question……………………………..14 6. Concluding Remarks…………………………………………..…..38 7. Bibliography………………………………………………………40 CEU eTD Collection 3 Abstract Ι will attempt to shed some light on the troubling matter of the obscure particulars ― treated by Aristotle in Meteorology ― (τῶν ἀφανῶν τῇ αἰσθήσει), that is, phenomena which are not apparent to the senses in their full extent (Meteorology 344a5). In the framework of the present paper, the aim is to highlight the use of κατά τόν λόγον which appears in the first lines of chapter I.7 of Aristotle’s Meteorology, by focusing on two philosophical questions: one ontological (what is the ontological status of obscure phenomena?) and one epistemological (can we come to the knowledge of such phenomena, and if so, in which way?). Aristotle proposes two answers to these questions in the text, respectively: The meteora (and therefore the comets discussed in chapter I.7 of Meteorology) are natural entities.
  • Catalogue of Titles of Works Attributed to Aristotle

    Catalogue of Titles of Works Attributed to Aristotle

    Catalogue of Titles of works attributed by Aristotle 1 To enhance readability of the translations and usability of the catalogues, I have inserted the following bold headings into the lists. These have no authority in any manuscript, but are based on a theory about the composition of the lists described in chapter 3. The text and numbering follows that of O. Gigon, Librorum deperditorum fragmenta. PART ONE: Titles in Diogenes Laertius (D) I. Universal works (ta kathalou) A. The treatises (ta syntagmatika) 1. The dialogues or exoterica (ta dialogika ex terika) 2. The works in propria persona or lectures (ta autopros pa akroamatika) a. Instrumental works (ta organika) b. Practical works (ta praktika) c. Productive Works (ta poi tika) d. Theoretical works (ta the r tika) . Natural philosophy (ta physiologia) . Mathematics (ta math matika) B. Notebooks (ta hypomn matika) II. Intermediate works (ta metaxu) III. Particular works (ta merika) PART TWO: Titles in the Vita Hesychii (H) This list is organized in the same way as D, with two exceptions. First, IA2c “productive works” has dropped out. Second, there is an appendix, organized as follows: IV. Appendix A. Intermediate or Particular works B. Treatises C. Notebooks D. Falsely ascribed works PART THREE: Titles in Ptolemy al-Garib (A) This list is organized in the same way as D, except it contains none of the Intermediate or Particular works. It was written in Arabic, and later translated into Latin, and then reconstructed into Greek, which I here translate. PART FOUR: Titles in the order of Bekker (B) The modern edition contains works only in IA2 (“the works in propria persona”), and replaces the theoretical works before the practical and productive, as follows.
  • Exclusivity, Teleology and Hierarchy: Our Aristotelean Legacy

    Exclusivity, Teleology and Hierarchy: Our Aristotelean Legacy

    Know!. Org. 26(1999)No.2 65 H.A. Olson: Exclusivity, Teleology and Hierarchy: Our Aristotelean Legacy Exclusivity, Teleology and Hierarchy: Our Aristotelean Legacy Hope A. Olson School of Library & Information Studies, University of Alberta Hope A. Olson is an Associate Professor and Graduate Coordinator in the School of Library and Information Studies at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. She holds a PhD from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and MLS from the University of Toronto. Her re­ search is generally in the area of subject access to information with a focus on classification. She approaches this work using feminist, poststructural and postcolonial theory. Dr. Olson teaches organization of knowledge, cataloguing and classification, and courses examining issues in femi­ nism and in globalization and diversity as they relate to library and information studies. Olson, H.A. (1999). Exclusivity, Teleology and Hierarchy: Our Aristotelean Legacy. Knowl· edge Organization, 26(2). 65-73. 16 refs. ABSTRACT: This paper examines Parmenides's Fragments, Plato's The Sophist, and Aristotle's Prior AnalyticsJ Parts ofAnimals and Generation ofAnimals to identify three underlying presumptions of classical logic using the method of Foucauldian discourse analysis. These three presumptions are the notion of mutually exclusive categories, teleology in the sense of linear progression toward a goal, and hierarchy both through logical division and through the dominance of some classes over others. These three presumptions are linked to classificatory thought in the western tradition. The purpose of making these connections is to investi­ gate the cultural specificity to western culture of widespread classificatory practice. It is a step in a larger study to examine classi­ fication as a cultural construction that may be systemically incompatible with other cultures and with marginalized elements of western culture.
  • A Reading of Porphyry's on Abstinence From

    A Reading of Porphyry's on Abstinence From

    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Justice Purity Piety: A Reading of Porphyry’s On Abstinence from Ensouled Beings A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Classics by Alexander Press 2020 © Copyright by Alexander Press 2020 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Justice Purity Piety: A Reading of Porphyry’s On Abstinence from Ensouled Beings by Alexander Press Doctor of Philosophy in Classics University of California, Los Angeles, 2020 Professor David Blank, Chair Abstract: Presenting a range of arguments against meat-eating, many strikingly familiar, Porphyry’s On Abstinence from Ensouled Beings (Greek Περὶ ἀποχῆς ἐµψύχων, Latin De abstinentia ab esu animalium) offers a sweeping view of the ancient debate concerning animals and their treatment. At the same time, because of its advocacy of an asceticism informed by its author’s Neoplatonism, Abstinence is often taken to be concerned primarily with the health of the human soul. By approaching Abstinence as a work of moral suasion and a work of literature, whose intra- and intertextual resonances yield something more than a collection of propositions or an invitation to Quellenforschung, I aim to push beyond interpretations that bracket the arguments regarding animals as merely dialectical; cast the text’s other-directed principle of justice as wholly ii subordinated to a self-directed principle of purity; or accept as decisive Porphyry’s exclusion of craftsmen, athletes, soldiers, sailors, and orators from his call to vegetarianism.

  • Aristotle on How Animals Move Edited by Andrea Falcon , Stasinos Stavrianeas , with Contributions by Pantelis Golitsis Frontmatter More Information

    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-49133-4 — Aristotle on How Animals Move Edited by Andrea Falcon , Stasinos Stavrianeas , With contributions by Pantelis Golitsis Frontmatter More Information ARISTOTLE ON HOW ANIMALS MOVE The De incessu animalium forms an integral part of Aristotle’s biological corpus but is one of the least studied Aristotelian works both by ancient and modern interpreters. Yet it is a treatise where we can see, with some clarity and detail, Aristotle’s methodology at work. This volume contains a new critical edition of the Greek text, an English translation, and nine in-depth interpretative essays. A general introduction that focuses on the explanatory strategies adopted by Aristotle in the De incessu animalium plus a historical essay on the reception of this work in antiquity and beyond open the volume. No other work of this kind has been published in any modern language. andrea falcon is affiliated with Concordia University, (Montréal, Canada) and University of Milan, La Statale (Italy). He is the author of several books on Aristotle and the Aristotelian tradition, including Aristotle and the Science of Nature: Unity without Uniformity (Cambridge, 2005), Aristotelianism in the First Century BC: Xenarchus of Seleucia (Cambridge, 2011) and, coedited with David Lefebvre, Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide (Cambridge, 2017). stasinos stavrianeas is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Patras. He specializes in Aristotle’s natural philosophy, biology and metaphysics and is the author of a Modern Greek translation and commentary of Aristotle’s Parts of Animals (2021) and is currently preparing a similar edition of Aristotle’s Generation of Animals.
  • Aristotle -- Parts of Animals. Movement of Animals. Progression of Animals

    Aristotle -- Parts of Animals. Movement of Animals. Progression of Animals

    THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES THE LOEB CLASSICAL LIBRARY FOUNDED BY JAMES LOEB, LL.D. EDITED BY fT. E. PAGE, O.H., LITT.D. t E. CAPPS, PH.D., LL.D. t W. H. D. ROUSE, litt.d. L. A, POST, L.H.D. E. H. WARMINGTON, m.a., f.b.hist.soo. ARISTOTLE PARTS OF ANIMALS MOVEMENT OF ANIMALS PROGRESSION OF ANIMALS ARISTOTLE PARTS OF ANIMALS WITH AN ENGLISH TRANSLATION BY A. L. PECK, M.A., Ph.D. FELLOW OF Christ's college, cambriook AND DNIVERSITY LECTURER IN CLASSICS AND A FOREWORD BY F. H. A. MARSHALL, C.B.E., Sc.D., F.R.S. MOVEMENT OF ANIMALS PROGRESSION OF ANIMALS WITH AN ENGLISH TRANSLATION BY E. S. FORSTER, M.A. PROFESSOR OF GREEK IN THE I'NIVERSITV OF SHEFFIKLD CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS HAR\^ARD UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON WILLIAM HEINEMANN LTD MCMLXI First printed 1937 Revised and reprinted 1945, 1955 Revised and reprinted 1961 Printed in Chreat BrUain CONTENTS PAQB PARTS OF ANIMALS Foreword ....... 3 Introduction ...... 8 Text and Translation .... 52 MOVEMENT OF ANIMALS PROGRESSION OF ANIMALS Introduction ...... 43 Text and Translation .... 440 Index to Parts of Animals . 543 Index to Movement and Progression of Animals. ...... 552 From quotations which I had seen, I had a high notion of Aristotle's merits, but I had not the most remote notion what a wonderful man he was. Linnaeus and Cuvier have been my two gods, though in very diiferent ways, but they were mere schoolboys to old Aristotle. Charles Darwin to William Ogle, on the publication of his translation of The Parts of Ani- mals, 1882.
  • The Pythagorean Table of Opposites, Symbolic Classification, and Aristotle

    The Pythagorean Table of Opposites, Symbolic Classification, and Aristotle

    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Philosophy Faculty Research and Publications Philosophy, Department of 6-2015 The Pythagorean Table of Opposites, Symbolic Classification, and Aristotle Owen Goldin Marquette University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.marquette.edu/phil_fac Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Goldin, Owen, "The Pythagorean Table of Opposites, Symbolic Classification, and Aristotle" (2015). Philosophy Faculty Research and Publications. 575. https://epublications.marquette.edu/phil_fac/575 Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Philosophy Faculty Research and Publications/College of Arts and Sciences This paper is NOT THE PUBLISHED VERSION. Access the published version at the link in the citation below. Science in Context, Vol. 28, No. 2 (June 2015): 171-193. DOI. This article is © Cambridge University Press and permission has been granted for this version to appear in e-Publications@Marquette. Cambridge University Press does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Cambridge University Press. The Pythagorean Table of Opposites, Symbolic Classification, and Aristotle Owen Goldin Philosophy Department, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI Argument At Metaphysics A 5 986a22-b2, Aristotle refers to a Pythagorean table, with two columns of paired opposites. I argue that 1) although Burkert and Zhmud have argued otherwise, there is sufficient textual evidence
  • The Logical Grammar of Kant's Twelve Forms of Judgment : a Formalized Study of Kant's Table of Judgments

    The Logical Grammar of Kant's Twelve Forms of Judgment : a Formalized Study of Kant's Table of Judgments

    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 1-1-1972 The logical grammar of Kant's twelve forms of judgment : a formalized study of Kant's table of judgments. Kirk Dallas Wilson University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1 Recommended Citation Wilson, Kirk Dallas, "The logical grammar of Kant's twelve forms of judgment : a formalized study of Kant's table of judgments." (1972). Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014. 2172. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1/2172 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE LOGICAL GRAMMAR OF KANT'S TWELVE FORMS OF JUDGMENT- A FORMALIZED STUDY OF KANT'S TABLE OF JUDGMENTS A Dissertation Presented By Kirk Dallas Wilson Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY February, 1972 Philosophy Kirk Dallas Wilson All Rights Reserved ) ) ) IHE LOGICAL GRAMMAR OF ICANT’S TWELVE FORMS OF JUDGMENT A FORMALIZED STUDY OF KANT'S TABLE OF JUDGMENTS A Dissertation By Kirk Dallas Wilson Approved as to style and content by: irman of Committee) ^Head of Department) (Member (Member) ^Member (Month (Year acknowledgments My deepest gratitude and thanks is extended to Professor Leonard H. Ehrlich whose incisive questions and criticisms forced me to think hard about the topics explored in this dissertation.
  • Nature and Moral Excellence in the Aristotelian Ethics

    Nature and Moral Excellence in the Aristotelian Ethics

    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1976 Nature and Moral Excellence in the Aristotelian Ethics Robert Geis Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Geis, Robert, "Nature and Moral Excellence in the Aristotelian Ethics" (1976). Master's Theses. 2840. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/2840 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1976 Robert Geis NATURE AND MORAL EXCELLENCE IN THE ARISTOTELIAN ETHICS by Robert Geis A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Loyola University of Chicago in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of master of Arts February 1976 PREFACE The past three decades have seen an appreciable growth of interest in ethics both here and in Europe, with discus­ sion equally fruitful in both the classical and modern po­ sitions. The topics discussed, varied and wide-ranging as the.problems they consider, continue to provide appreciat­ ion for the complexities that ethics must treat, whether the views set forth have been one's own or that of a major fig- ure. This thesis is of the latter kind. It centers direct­ ly on one theme in Aristotle's ethics, viz., the relation there of Nature and moral excellence.
  • Aristotle on the Nature of Logos

    Aristotle on the Nature of Logos

    Binghamton University The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB) The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter 3-1997 Aristotle on the Nature of Logos John P. Anton University of South Florida at Tampa Follow this and additional works at: https://orb.binghamton.edu/sagp Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Ancient Philosophy Commons, and the History of Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Anton, John P., "Aristotle on the Nature of Logos" (1997). The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter. 243. https://orb.binghamton.edu/sagp/243 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). It has been accepted for inclusion in The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter by an authorized administrator of The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARISTOTLE ON THE NATURE OF LOGOS ©John P. Anton Department of Philosophy University of South Florida Tampa, Florida I. Synopsis Attention has been frequently drawn to the problems attending attempts "to trace a long progression of meanings in the history of the wordlogos" (Kerferd). Especially difficult proved the assigning to Aristotle a place in this long progression. One of the reasons is that we have yet to reconstruct his theorylogos. of The difficulty is not so much with the complexity of the uses of the term in his works as it is with the widely recognized fact that he left no special treatise on the subject of a doctrinelogos, of not to be confused with the instrumentalities found in the so-called logical works that comprise theOrganon.
  • Aristotle's Scientific Contributions to the Classification, Nomenclature And

    Aristotle's Scientific Contributions to the Classification, Nomenclature And

    Research Article Mediterranean Marine Science Indexed in WoS (Web of Science, ISI Thomson) and SCOPUS The journal is available on line at http://www.medit-mar-sc.net DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/mms.13874 Aristotle’s scientific contributions to the classification, nomenclature and distribution of marine organisms ELENI VOULTSIADOU1, VASILIS GEROVASILEIOU2, LEEN VANDEPITTE3, KOSTAS GANIAS1 and CHRISTOS ARVANITIDIS2 1 Department of Zoology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece 2 Institute of Marine Biology, Biotechnology and Aquaculture, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, 71003 Heraklion, Crete, Greece 3 Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ), InnovOcean Site, Wandelaarkaai 7, 8400 Oostende, Belgium Corresponding author: [email protected] Handling Editor: Argyro Zenetos Received: 22 May 2017; Accepted: 25 August 2017; Published on line: 11 December 2017 Abstract The biological works of the Greek philosopher Aristotle include a significant amount of information on marine animals. This study is an overview of Aristotle’s scientific contribution to the knowledge of marine biodiversity and specifically to taxonomic classification, nomenclature and distribution of marine species. Our results show that Aristotle’s approach looks remarkably fa- miliar to present day marine biologists since: (i) although not directly aiming at it, he gave a taxonomic classification of marine animals, which includes physical groups ranked on three levels at least; (ii) most of Aristotle’s marine “major groups” correspond
  • From Aristotle's Teleology to Darwin's Genealogy -.: Fernando Santiago

    From Aristotle's Teleology to Darwin's Genealogy -.: Fernando Santiago

    From Aristotle’s Teleology to Darwin’s Genealogy From Aristotle’s Teleology to Darwin’s Genealogy The Stamp of Inutility Marco Solinas Translated from the Italian by James Douglas © Marco Solinas 2015 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published in 2012 in Italian by Edizioni ETS, entitled L’impronta dell’inutilità. Dalla teleologia di Aristotele alle genealogie di Darwin. Published 2015 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of St Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010. Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world. Palgrave® and Macmillan® are registered trademarks in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe and other countries. ISBN: 978–1–137–44576–6 This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources.