DOCSLIB.ORG

Open Space Report 2015/16 Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Open Space Report 2015/16 Final Dartford Development Policies Plan Dartford Open Space Report 2015/16 Final Submission June 2016 Dartford Open Space Report 2015/16 Final Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 2. The Development Plan & National Policy ....................................................................................... 2 3. PLGS Methodology & Consultation Summary ................................................................................ 5 4. Dartford Borough Application of PLGS Criteria............................................................................... 7 5. Proposed PLGS in the Borough ..................................................................................................... 10 6. Borough Open Space .................................................................................................................... 14 7. Investigating North Kent Habitats Mitigation Options ................................................................. 16 8. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................... 19 Appendix A: PLGS Confirmed Shortlist and Final Scoring ..................................................................... 20 Appendix B: Dartford Borough Open Space Technical Record 2016 .................................................... 22 Dartford Open Space Report 2015/16 Final 1. Introduction 1.1 Dartford is a small borough featuring major areas of change, and also a rural Green Belt area dominating the southern half of the Borough. The Dartford Core Strategy’s major development areas envisaged an accompanying “Green Grid” to be formulated to enhance the environment and local wellbeing. This note identifies the community’s most special green spaces, which form valued/ high quality component parts of the Green Grid. 1.2 At present there is limited identification or development management policy associated with green space in Dartford other than for the Green Belt and designated nature conservation sites. The emerging Development Policies Plan and new Policies Map looks to address this, providing for the retention of green spaces as appropriate, in parallel with the provisions in Core Strategy policy CS14 for new and improved open space. 1.3 This paper explains the principles behind, and process of, selecting open / greenspaces. It expands on the considerations outlined in evidence produced1 at the Draft Plan and Options Consultation stage of the Development Policies Plan (December 2014), and addresses further issues arising. 1.4 The paper mostly focuses on new evidence supporting specific ‘Protected Local Green Space’, as there is a pressing need in Dartford given very high growth levels, to closely consider the designation of certain locally valued spaces for protection in line with ‘Green Belt’ principles as introduced in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). This is covered in chapters 3- 5. 1.5 The paper also outlines in chapter 6 the range of other open spaces across the area worthy of identification: ‘Borough Open Space’ (BOS); as there is also a need to consider which other open spaces throughout the Borough should be managed through planning policy. An outline update is also provided in relation to a key habitats issue in the wider sub-region (chapter 7). This draws from specific reports produced to consider the way forward for development issues in Dartford. A summary conclusion forms chapter 8. 1 DBC (2014) A Draft Green Grid & Open Space Update Paper. See section 1.5. 1 Dartford Open Space Report 2015/16 Final 1.6 Appendices detail proposed designations, and the outcomes of potential PLGS and BOS site assessments. The following (chapter 2) outlines the planning policy context within which the research and surveying has been conducted. 2. The Development Plan & National Policy 2.1 The DBC (2014) “A Draft Green Grid & Open Space Update Paper” reviewed national and adopted local policy. This remains relevant, however further discussion is warranted, particularly of more detailed national guidance for PLGS, and BOS decisions. 2.2 Green and open space takes a variety of forms and performs different functions. Core Strategy policy CS14 sets the local strategic context through identifying key principles for a “multi- functional, high quality, varied, and well managed Green Gird.” The policy is not further revisited here, other than to confirm that includes (CS14:1e) provision for “Protecting and enhancing exiting open spaces, including…. those identified and designated as locally important…” The Development Policies Local Plan helps achieve this by setting out specific policy and by clarifying the applicable land (to be shown on the Policies Map). 2.3 National policy is clear that generally open space, including sports and playing fields should not be built on. The proposed BOS policy (DP24) is the normal means by which many of these open spaces will be governed locally in planning terms. This addresses the exceptions in NPPF paragraph 74, which apply are where: • an assessment has been undertaken which has clearly shown the open space, buildings or land to be surplus to requirements; or • the loss resulting from the proposed development would be replaced by equivalent or better provision in terms of quantity and quality in a suitable location; or • the development is for alternative sports and recreational provision, the needs for which clearly outweigh the loss. 2.4 The approach to identifying lands where a criteria-based approach to managing their future as open space is set out in chapter 6. 2.5 National policy further states: “By designating land as Local Green Space local communities will be able to rule out new development other than in very special circumstances”. (NPPF paragraph 76). This particular provision is therefore a powerful land use tool to apply carefully 2 Dartford Open Space Report 2015/16 Final and selectively, with full consideration of long-term issues and sustainable development needs. It will form only one potential tool, albeit a highly influential one. It can therefore provide a structure to managing open spaces, with these outstanding spaces identified and protected, leaving ‘residual’ other green/ open places to be dealt with appropriately as outlined above. 2.6 It is national policy that “Local policy for managing development within a Local Green Space should be consistent with policy for Green Belts.” (NPPF paragraph 78). 2.7 The government further advises in online guidance that particularly close consideration is required of the merits or otherwise of introducing the designation where land is already Green Belt or benefits from other conservation / national protection. Given it is expected that local Green Belt planning policy in the Development Polices Plan will be directly cross referred and applied in these circumstances, Dartford Borough Council is not aware of any logical argument to support Local Green Space designation that is necessary and adds value on top of land already identified under these significant protections. 2.8 Therefore the scope of this note and proposed policy is focussed on Dartford Borough’s non Green Belt land. This is where the predominance of the 43% household growth (2006-2026) is occurring, and where protection may be most valuable – in and immediately around communities. It has however been concluded that if not designated under local planning policy, land that is already protected through legislation as allotments, village greens/ commons etc, are not ruled out for consideration as Local Green Space. 2.9 National policy sets out relevant features that may make a space sufficiently special to qualify. These are: beauty, history, recreation, tranquillity or wildlife. The features listed are largely those commonly found in National level designations (eg. AONB/ SSSIs) or are have national oversight through Government Agencies such as Sports England. However it is noteworthy to Dartford that recently prominent matter of tranquillity has been highlighted in national policy. The NPPF (paragraph 123) confirms: “Planning policies and decisions should aim to…. Identify and protect areas of tranquillity which have remained relatively undisturbed by noise and are prized for their recreational and amenity value for this reason.” As a local or neighbourhood consideration, their performance is best judged on a comparative basis within the context of the locality. The value attached to a space may differ if it were located elsewhere in the Borough, county or country. 3 Dartford Open Space Report 2015/16 Final 2.10 Online national guidance states the designation will “rarely be appropriate where the land has planning permission for development”, thus restricting further the scope of potential qualifying spaces in the Borough. 2.11 National policy emphasises these spaces are to be local in scale and character. In terms of additional characteristics, the online guidance also confirms that the land may or may not provide public access and, “A Local Green Space does not need to be in public ownership”. 2.12 In summary, the government describes the intention in its online guidance as: “Local Green Space designation is a way to provide special protection against development for green areas of particular importance to local communities.” In Dartford Borough, land must fall outside the existing Green Belt designation. Many other areas with
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Landscape Assessment of Kent 2004
    CHILHAM: STOUR VALLEY Location map: CHILHAMCHARACTER AREA DESCRIPTION North of Bilting, the Stour Valley becomes increasingly enclosed. The rolling sides of the valley support large arable fields in the east, while sweeps of parkland belonging to Godmersham Park and Chilham Castle cover most of the western slopes. On either side of the valley, dense woodland dominate the skyline and a number of substantial shaws and plantations on the lower slopes reflect the importance of game cover in this area. On the valley bottom, the river is picked out in places by waterside alders and occasional willows. The railway line is obscured for much of its length by trees. STOUR VALLEY Chilham lies within the larger character area of the Stour Valley within the Kent Downs AONB. The Great Stour is the most easterly of the three rivers cutting through the Downs. Like the Darent and the Medway, it too provided an early access route into the heart of Kent and formed an ancient focus for settlement. Today the Stour Valley is highly valued for the quality of its landscape, especially by the considerable numbers of walkers who follow the Stour Valley Walk or the North Downs Way National Trail. Despite its proximity to both Canterbury and Ashford, the Stour Valley retains a strong rural identity. Enclosed by steep scarps on both sides, with dense woodlands on the upper slopes, the valley is dominated by intensively farmed arable fields interspersed by broad sweeps of mature parkland. Unusually, there are no electricity pylons cluttering the views across the valley. North of Bilting, the river flows through a narrow, pastoral floodplain, dotted with trees such as willow and alder and drained by small ditches.
    [Show full text]
  • Sevenoaks District Countryside Assessment
    Sevenoaks District Countryside Assessment Babtie Group Management & Technical Consultants October 2004 Forward The District Council has decided to produce a District wide Countryside Character Assessment . Now adopted, this will contribute towards the formulation of policies and decisions at a local level, including the provision of essential background information for the Sevenoaks District Community Strategy theme, - “Green and Healthy Environment”. It will also be taken into account in assessing planning applications. This project work has been carried out by the Babtie Group on behalf of Kent County Council, Sevenoaks District Council and the Countryside Agency. The document is based on the policies contained in National Guidance, as set out in the main document under “National Planning Guidance”. It is also consistent with the land use Development Plan policies at a local level contained within: the Kent Structure Plan (adopted 1996), Deposit Draft Kent and Medway Structure Plan (2003) and the Sevenoaks District Local Plan (adopted 2000). It is intended to supplement planning policies by describing the landscape character to which these policies apply. The most relevant Structure and Local Plan Policies are listed on the following pages. SEVENOAKS DISTRICT LOCAL PLAN - Adopted 2000 Policy No EN6 The Kent Downs and High Weald Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty are shown on the Proposals Map. Development, which would harm or detract from the landscape character of these areas, will not be permitted EN7 Development within the North Downs and Greensand Ridge Special Landscape Areas will be permitted only where it would cause no significant harm to the landscape character of the area. EN8 Proposals in Areas of Local Landscape Importance must not harm the local character of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Authority Monitoring Report 2016-2017
    DARTFORD LOCAL PLAN AUTHORITY MONITORING 2017 REPORT - The Council monitors development in the Borough and the impact of planning policies and strategies. This allows us to assess whether our policies are having effect and when we need to review them. This reports looks at a changes over the past financial year. 2016 December 2017 [This page is intentionally blank] December 2017 INTRODUCTION 1. Introduction 1.1 The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (as amended) requires every local planning authority to make a report monitoring the implementation of the policies contained in the authority’s Local Plan. The report must be published at least annually in the interests of transparency. 1.2 Regulation 34 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 prescribes minimum information to be incorporated within monitoring reports, including: net additional dwellings; net additional affordable dwellings; details of neighbourhood plans, and action taken under the Duty to Cooperate. 1.3 This is the twelfth AMR that has been produced by Dartford Borough Council. It monitors the period between 1st April 2016 and 31st March 2017. Previous AMRs can be found on the Dartford website, with the 2015-16 AMR also including a 10 year review and infrastructure update. 1.4 We also produce research in specific topics. This includes: • 2006-2016 Review analysis of changes in Dartford since the start of the Local Plan period as part of the 2015-16 AMR. • The Five Year Deliverable Housing Land Supply • Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) receipts and expenditure • Bespoke evidence for individual Local Plans. For example, a range of documents were produced for the Development Policies Plan (2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Kent Habitat Works 2015
    1 Kent Rare Plant Register 2015 Appendix HABITAT WORKS Compiled by Owen Leyshon and the Kent Botanical Recording Group Issue date: March 2016 2 Introduction The purpose of this appendix is to provide the first in a set of regular updates, collating the practical habitat works targeted at Kent Rare Plant Register (RPR) species across the county of Kent in 2015. It concentrates on actual ‘hands-on’ works and interventions for individual species and does not aim to capture the vast amount of effort across the county by landowners to enhance and monitor key habitats. So, for example, there are not included many grazing programmes, woodland coppicing works or ditch maintenance regimes, which may have general habitat benefits without necessarily targeting key RPR species. The appendix also does not cover a number of habitat works on species which remain quite widespread across the county, such as namely Melampyrum pratense (Common Cow-wheat) and Carlina vulgaris, and also some works for the encouragement of species which might be uncommon in one end of the county but overall do not qualify for the Kent RPR, such as Ceratocapnos claviculata (Climbing Corydalis) and Samolus valerandi (Brookweed), where valuable actions are being undertaken, for example in the Bexley area. A fully comprehensive account is not to be expected, and if any key work or individual actions do not appear here, then details (including photographs, if available) will be welcome, and also contributions for the 2016 appendix. Please provide to the author, Owen Leyshon, [email protected] (work – 01797 367934). Many thanks to all the 2015 contributors, acknowledged below.
    [Show full text]
  • Samuel Palmer's Earthly Paradise
    SAMUEL PALMER’S EARTHLY PARADISE THE DARENT VALLEY LANDSCAPE PARTNERSHIP SCHEME LANDSCAPE CONSERVATION ACTION PLAN PART 1 – THE SCHEME PLAN | PART 2 - PROJECT SUMMARIES CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 Establishing the Partnership .................................................................................................................................... 7 The Landscape Area, its Heritage and its People ...................................................................................................... 9 The Landscape ........................................................................................................................................................... 9 The Darent Valley’s Heritage .................................................................................................................................. 15 1. Prehistory ............................................................................................................................................................. 15 2. Roman Heritage ................................................................................................................................................... 15 3.Anglo- Saxon ......................................................................................................................................................... 17 4. Mediaeval ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kent Rare Plant Register Draft Species Accounts C (Third Part: Ci-Cy)
    1 Kent Rare Plant Register Draft species accounts C (third part: Ci-Cy) Compiled by Geoffrey Kitchener and the Kent Botanical Recording Group Issue date: March 2019 2 Kent rare plant register This section of the register covers: In Part Ca: Carex lepidocarpa Centaurea cyanus Cirsium eriophorum Callitriche truncata Carex nigra Cephalanthera Cladium mariscus Calystegia soldanella Carex panicea damasonium Clinopodium acinos Campanula glomerata Carex pulicaris Cerastium arvense Clinopodium nepeta Campanula rotundifolia Carex rostrata Chaenorhinum Comarum palustre Cardamine bulbifera Carex vesicaria origanifolium Crassula tillaea Cardamine impatiens Carex vulpina Chamaemelum nobile Crepis foetida Carex canescens Calina vulgaris Chenopodiastrum murale Cruciata laevipes Carex divisa Catabrosa aquatica Chenopodium vulvaria Cuscuta epithymum Carex echinata Cynoglossum officinale Carex elata In Part Ci-Cy: Carex elongata In Part Ce-Ch: Cichorum intybus Carex extensa Centaurea calcitrapa Cicuta virosa It is issued in draft, pending further development. Records, photographs and information regarding the occurrences of these plants in Kent will be welcome. The register accounts give priority to data from 2010 onwards, but some historic data are also included (however, in the data tables, generally no specific sites without post-1970 records) so as to indicate trends and where the plant may yet be discovered or rediscovered. Distribution maps for records from 2010 onwards show vice counties 15 and 16 in white (the boundary between is a black line) and local authority boundaries by red lines. See the Kent webpage of the BSBI website at http://www.bsbi.org.uk/kent.html for the full Kent rare plant register list, the introduction to the register and a list of ‘probably extinct’ Kent plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Occasional Erraticserratics
    OccasionalOccasional ErraticsErratics Newsletter of the MEDWAY FOSSIL AND MINERAL SOCIETY www.mfms.org.uk No. 16. July 2021 I am obliged to add the following, to all those members of the Medway Fossil and Mineral Society, who receive this communication by direct email or by post, under the provision of the General Data Protection Regulation (2018) If you no longer wish to hear from the Medway Fossil and Mineral Society, please contact [email protected], confirming your name and address, and stating that you wish to unsubscribe from the Medway Fossil and Mineral Society’s communications. The editor of this edition of the MFMS Newsletter was Nick Baker Cover picture Flittermouse Hole. On the downs, north of Birling, Kent. This section is typical of the base of the Upper Chalk. Note, the location is part of land owned by Birling Estates. Any views expressed in this Newsletter are the views of the Editor and the named author of any articles published and are not necessarily the views of the Committee. Articles are accepted for publication on the under- standing that they do not infringe past or present copyright laws and any information given by a writer is not always checked for accuracy. Unless otherwise stated, reproduction of articles is allowed, providing source and author are acknowledged. Index to editions 01-15 A long walk with Alice Nick Baker 11 2018 Dec American Parks (1-2) Gary Woodall 12 2019 July American Parks Part 3: Badlands Gary Woodall 13 2019 Dec American Parks Part 4: Wind Cave Gary Woodall 14 2020 July American Parks Part 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Kent Rare Plant Register Draft Species Accounts Part D
    1 Kent Rare Plant Register Draft species accounts Part D Compiled by Geoffrey Kitchener and the Kent Botanical Recording Group Issue date: February 2018 2 Kent rare plant register This section of the register covers: Dactylorhiza incarnata Dactylorhiza maculata Daucus carota subsp. gummifer Descurainia sophia Dianthus armeria Dianthus deltoides Dipsacus pilosus Drosera rotundifolia Dryopteris aemula It is issued in draft, pending further development. Records, photographs and information regarding the Kentish occurrences of these plants will be welcome. The register accounts give priority to data from 2010 onwards, but some historic data are also included (however, in the data tables, generally no specific sites without post-1970 records) so as to indicate trends and where the plant may yet be discovered or rediscovered See the Kent webpage of the BSBI website at http://www.bsbi.org.uk/kent.html for: the full Kent rare plant register list the introduction to the register a list of ‘probably extinct’ Kent plants. Abbreviations used in the text: Recorders’ initials: JA Jan Armishaw RC Ray Clarke JBe Jim Bevan RF Rosemary FitzGerald AB Alan Blackman JBel J. Belsey RMB Rodney Burton BD Mrs B. Dodds JB John Badmin RR Rosemary Roberts BH Betsy Hewson JP Joyce Pitt SH Sam Hartley BW Brian Woodhams JRP John Palmer SB Sue Buckingham CC Chris Cook JT John Taplin SK Sarah Kitchener CR Chris Rose JW Jo Weightman SM S. Steve McArragher DJ David Johnson LH Lorna Holland SW Steve Weeks DM Daphne Mills LR Lliam Rooney PW Philip Wilson DS David Steere MGa Megan Gasson WHG W.H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sciarid Fauna of the British Isles (Diptera: Sciaridae), Including Descriptions of Six New Species
    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKZOJZoological Journal of the Linnean Society0024-4082The Lin- nean Society of London, 2006? 2006 146? 1147 Original Article BRITISH SCIARID FAUNAF. MENZEL ET AL. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2006, 146, 1–147. With 20 figures The sciarid fauna of the British Isles (Diptera: Sciaridae), including descriptions of six new species FRANK MENZEL1, JANE E. SMITH2* and PETER J. CHANDLER3 1Deutsches Entomologisches Institut, Leibniz-Zentrum für Agrarlandschafts- und Landnutzungsforschung (ZALF) e.V., Eberswalder Straße 84, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany 2Warwick HRI, Wellesbourne, Warwick CV35 9EF, UK 3606B Berryfield Lane, Melksham, Wilts. SN12 6EL, UK Received November 2004; accepted for publication March 2005 The results of a revision of the Sciaridae (Diptera: Nematocera) from the British Isles are presented, carried out as a preliminary to the preparation of a new Handbook for the identification of the British and Irish fauna of this family. A total fauna of 263 species is confirmed, including many species new to the British Isles: 111 new to Great Britain and 32 new to Ireland. Epidapus (Pseudoaptanogyna) echinatum Mohrig & Kozánek, 1992, hitherto known only from North Korea, is newly recorded from Europe. Six species are described as new to science: Bradysia austera Menzel & Heller sp. nov., Bradysia ismayi Menzel sp. nov., Bradysia nigrispina Menzel sp. nov., Corynoptera fla- vosignata Menzel & Heller sp. nov., Corynoptera uncata Menzel & Smith sp. nov. and Epidapus subgra- cilis Menzel & Mohrig sp. nov. The following new synonymies are proposed: Leptosciarella nigrosetosa (Freeman, 1990) = Leptosciarella truncatula Mohrig & Menzel, 1997; Sciara nursei Freeman, 1983 = Sciara ulrichi Menzel & Mohrig, 1998. Many misidentifications in the previous literature are corrected.
    [Show full text]
  • Knockholt Downs
    KNOCKHOLT DOWNS Location map: ThisCHARACTER is an intimate, AREA enclosed DESCRIPTION landscape of ridges and dry valleys extending north-west from the scarp within the West Darent character area of the Kent Downs AONB. Although densely settled, the undulating topography and extensive network of lacy woodlands often conceal the suburban dwellings that have straggled down the country lanes earlier this century. Suburbanisation is often intensified, however, by the presence of pavements on the lanes, conifer hedges and brick walls around gardens, the latter often accessed through elaborate entrance gates into the larger properties. The ridge-top broadleaf woodlands and remnant shaws enclose small grazed fields, particularly in or close to the dry valleys that dissect the landscape to the north. The hedgerows and fields are often distinguished by large, mature oaks and beech, which may mark lines of old hedgerows or shaws. The views north and west over the valleys to the wooded ridges of Bromley give an impression of an enclosed and seemingly sparsely populated landscape which is deceptive. On the flatter, plateau areas between the dry valleys and the scarp top, the land is often cultivated in larger, open fields. Between the suburban housing are the vernacular centres of what were once smaller villages such as Halstead and Knockholt itself. Here the older buildings are characteristically brick or flint. next >> Prepared for Kent County Council by Jacobs Babtie KNOCKHOLT DOWNS PHOTOGRAPH CONTEXT Regional: North West Kent Condition CONSERVE & REINFORCE CONSERVE good REINFORCE CREATE & CONSERVE & CONSERVE & moderate REINFORCE CREATE RESTORE RESTORE & CREATE RESTORE CREATE poor low moderate high CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES Undulating topography of ridges and dry valleys.
    [Show full text]
  • Sevenoaks District Local Plan 2015-2035
    Sevenoaks District Local Plan 2015-2035 Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report November 2016 Sevenoaks District Local Plan 2015-2035 SA Scoping Report Nov 2016 Table of contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 2. Biodiversity ........................................................................................................................... 5 3. Climate Change ................................................................................................................. 12 4. Landscape and Historic Environment ........................................................................... 22 5. Environmental Quality ..................................................................................................... 38 6. Land, Soil and Water resources ..................................................................................... 44 7. Population and Communities ......................................................................................... 48 8. Health and Wellbeing ....................................................................................................... 59 9. Transportation ................................................................................................................... 66 10. Economy ............................................................................................................................. 71 11. Next steps..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Local Plan
    Tunbridge Wells Borough Cabinet: 15 August 2019 Please note: This draft is subject to further textual and other minor amendments, and all web links to supporting documents will be updated prior to the start of public consultation. Draft Local Plan Regulation 18 Consultation Draft Consultation: 20 September to 1 November 2019 Draft Local Plan (Regulation 18) Consultation Draft Index of Policies 3 Foreword 9 Section 1: Introduction 10 Purpose of the Plan 10 Public consultation: how to get involved 11 Producing a new Local Plan 14 Section 2: Setting the Scene 19 Borough Profile and Context 19 Challenges and Opportunities 21 Section 3: Vision and Objectives 28 Vision 28 Strategic Objectives 29 Section 4: The Development Strategy and Strategic 31 Policies The Development Strategy 31 Key Diagram 38 The Strategic Policies 39 Section 5: Place Shaping Policies 60 Royal Tunbridge Wells 61 Southborough 136 Capel (including Tudeley Village) 151 Paddock Wood 166 Cranbrook and Sissinghurst 193 Hawkhurst 232 Benenden 260 20 September to 1 November 2019 Tunbridge Wells Borough Local Plan Consultation Draft Draft Local Plan (Regulation 18) Bidborough 273 Brenchley and Matfield 276 Frittenden 288 Goudhurst 293 Horsmonden 302 Lamberhurst 311 Pembury 319 Rusthall 337 Sandhurst 342 Speldhurst 349 Section 6: Development Management Policies 360 Environment 361 Housing 428 Employment 457 Town, Rural Service, Neighbourhood, and Village Centres472 Transport and Parking 481 Open Space, Sport, and Recreation 496 Section 7: Delivery and Monitoring 501 Appendix 1:
    [Show full text]