DOCSLIB.ORG

1441511* Crc/C/Tza/3-5

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1441511* Crc/C/Tza/3-5 United Nations CRC/C/TZA/3-5* Convention on the Distr.: General 4 November 2013 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 44 of the Convention Third to fifth periodic reports of States parties due in 2012 United Republic of Tanzania** [13 January 2012] * Reissued for technical reasons on 12 March 2014. * In accordance with the information transmitted to State parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document has not been formally edited. GE.14-41511 *1441511* CRC/C/TZA/3-5 Contents Paragraphs Page List of abbreviations ........................................................................................................................ 5 Introduction............................................................................................................. 1–3 7 1. General measures of implementation (arts. 4, 42 and 44, para. 6, of the Convention) .................................................................................................. 4–34 8 1.1 Legal framework and harmonization of legislation with the Convention ...... 4 8 1.2 Legislation ..................................................................................................... 5–10 8 1.3 Coordination .................................................................................................. 11–14 12 1.4 Resource allocation for children .................................................................... 15–16 13 1.5 National Plan of Action ................................................................................. 17–19 13 1.6 Independent monitoring ................................................................................. 20–23 14 1.7 Data collection ............................................................................................... 24–27 14 1.8 Dissemination, training and awareness-raising ............................................. 28–30 15 1.9 Cooperation with civil society ....................................................................... 31–34 16 2. Definition of the child (art. 1) ................................................................................. 35–37 17 3. General principles (arts. 2, 3, 6 and 12) ................................................................. 38–59 17 3.1 Non-discrimination (art. 2) ............................................................................ 38–45 17 3.2 Best interests of the child (art. 3) ................................................................... 46–50 19 3.3 The right to life, survival and development (art. 6) ....................................... 51–52 20 3.4 Respect for the views of the child (art. 12) .................................................... 53–59 21 4. Civil rights and freedoms (arts. 7, 8, 13–17, and 37(a)).......................................... 60–90 22 4.1 Birth registration, name, nationality (art. 7) and preservation of the child’s identity (art. 8) ......................................................................... 60–69 22 4.2 Freedom of expression and the right to seek, receive and impart information (art. 13) ...................................................................................... 70–74 25 4.3 Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (art. 14) .................................. 75–76 26 4.4 Freedom of association and peaceful assembly (art. 15) ............................... 77–78 26 4.5 Protection of privacy and protection of image (art. 16) ................................. 79–81 27 4.6 Access to information from a diversity of sources and protection from material harmful to the child’s well-being (art. 17) ....................................... 82–84 28 4.7 Corporal punishment ..................................................................................... 85–90 28 5. Family environment and alternative care (arts. 5, 18, paras. 1–2, 9–11, 19–21, 25, 27, para. 4, and 39) ............................................................................... 91–126 30 5.1 Family environment and parental guidance (art. 5) ....................................... 91–94 30 5.2 Parents’ common responsibilities, assistance to parents and provision of childcare services (art. 18) ........................................................................ 95–98 31 2 CRC/C/TZA/3-5 5.3 Separation from parents (art. 9) ..................................................................... 99–102 32 5.4 Family reunification (art. 10) ......................................................................... 103–104 33 5.5 Recovery of maintenance for the child (art. 27, para. 4) ............................... 105 34 5.6 Children deprived of a family environment (art. 20) ..................................... 106–108 34 5.7 Periodic review of placement (art. 25) .......................................................... 109–114 35 5.8 Adoption, national and intercountry (art. 21) ................................................ 115–118 37 5.9 Illicit transfer and non-return (art. 11) ........................................................... 119–120 37 5.10 Abuse and neglect, including physical and psychological recovery (art. 19) and social reintegration (art. 39) ....................................... 121–127 38 6. Disability, basic health and welfare (arts. 6, 18, para. 3, 23, 24, 26, 27, para. 1–3, and 33) ............................................................................................. 128–212 40 6.1 Survival and development (art. 6, para. 2) ..................................................... 128–130 40 6.2 Health and health services (art. 24) ............................................................... 131–175 40 6.3 HIV/AIDS ..................................................................................................... 176–191 53 6.4 Water and sanitation ...................................................................................... 192–196 56 6.5 Adolescent health .......................................................................................... 197–199 57 6.6 Measures to prohibit and eliminate harmful traditional practices (art. 24, para. 3) .............................................................................. 200–205 58 6.7 Measures to protect children from substance abuse (art. 33) ......................... 206–207 59 6.8 Measures to ensure the protection of children with incarcerated parents and children living in prison with their mothers ............................................ 208 59 6.9 Children with disabilities ............................................................................... 209–212 60 7. Education, leisure and cultural activities (arts. 28–31) .......................................... 213–236 61 7.1 Improvement in the overall quality of education ........................................... 213–235 61 7.2 Leisure, recreational and cultural activities ................................................... 236 66 8. Special protection measures (arts. 22, 30, 32–36, 37(b)–(d), 38, 39 and 40) ......... 237–310 66 8.1 Children outside their country of origin seeking refugee protection (art. 23) ............................................................................ 237–243 66 8.2 Children in armed conflicts (arts. 38 and 39) ................................................ 244–253 67 8.3 Street children ................................................................................................ 254–258 69 8.4 Children in situations of exploitation, including physical and psychological recovery and social integration ............................................... 259–268 70 8.5 Drug abuse ..................................................................................................... 269–270 72 8.6 Sale, trafficking and abduction ...................................................................... 271–292 73 8.7 Other forms of exploitation (art. 36) .............................................................. 293 77 8.8 Children in conflict with law, victims and witnesses .................................... 294–298 77 8.9 Administration of juvenile justice ................................................................. 299–304 78 3 CRC/C/TZA/3-5 8.10 Right not to be subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, including corporal punishment (arts. 37 (a) and 28, para. 2) ....................................................... 305–308 79 8.11 Measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims (art. 39) ........................................................... 309–310 80 9. References........................................................................................................................................ 81 9.1 Regional and international instruments .................................................................................. 81 9.2 Domestic statutes .................................................................................................................... 81 9.3 Policies .................................................................................................................................... 82 9.4 Cases........................................................................................................................................ 83 9.5 Reports....................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Zanzibar Human Rights Report 2015 by Zlsc
    Zanzibar Human Rights Report 2015 TransformIfanye Justicehaki IweInto shaukuPassion Zanzibar Legal Services Centre i Funded by: Embassy of Sweden, Embassy of Finland The Embassy of Norway, Ford Foundation, and Open Society Initiatives for Eastern Africa, Publisher Zanzibar Legal Services Centre P.O.Box 3360,Zanzibar Tanzania Tel:+25524 2452936 Fax:+255 24 2334495 E-mail: [email protected] Website:www.zlsc.or.tz ZLSC May 2016 ii ZANZIBAR HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT 2015 Editorial Board Prof. Chris Maina Peter Mrs. Josefrieda Pereira Ms. Salma Haji Saadat Mr. Daudi Othman Kondo Ms. Harusi Miraji Mpatani Writers Dr. Moh’d Makame Mr. Mzee Mustafa Zanzibar Legal Services Centre @ ZLSC 2015 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Zanzibar Legal Services Centre is indebted to a number of individuals for the support and cooperation during collection, compilation and writing of the 10th Human Rights Report (Zanzibar Chapter). The contribution received makes this report a worthy and authoritative document in academic institutions, judiciary, government ministries and other departments, legislature and educative material to general public at large. The preparation involved several stages and in every stage different stakeholders were involved. The ZLSC appreciate the readiness and eager motive to fill in human rights opinion survey questionnaires. The information received was quite useful in grasping grassroots information relevant to this report. ZLSC extend their gratitude to it’s all Programme officers especially Adv. Thabit Abdulla Juma and Adv. Saida Amour Abdallah who worked hard on completion of this report. Further positive criticism and collections made by editorial board of the report are highly appreciated and valued. Without their value contributions this report would have jeopardised its quality and relevance to the general public.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Court of Appeal of Tanzania
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (MAIN REGISTRY) AT PAR ES SALAAM fCORAM: JUNDU. JK. MWARIJA, J AND TWAIB, 3.) Misc. Civil Cause No. 24 of 2013 LEGAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS CENTRE . 1st p e t i t i o n e r TANGANYIKA LAW SOCIETY........... 2 nd p e t i t i o n e r Versus HON. MIZENGO PINDA.................... 1 st r e s p o n d e n t ATTORNEY GENERAL....................... 2 nd r e s p o n d e n t Date of last order: 18/2/2014 Date of ruling: 6/6/2014 RULING JUNDU. JK: The dispute that has given rise to the present petition emanates from a statement allegedly made by the Prime Minister of the United Republic of Tanzania, Honourable Mizengo Kayanza Peter Pinda (hereinafter referred to as the "Prime Minister" or "the 1st respondent") while addressing a session of the National Assembly at Dodoma on 20th June, 2013. The petitioners, Legal and Human Rights Centre and the Tanganyika Law Society, are challenging part of the Prime Minister's statement, made during a weekly session of the Assembly called "maswali na majibu ya papo kwa papo kwa Mheshimiwa Waziri Mkuu". The Prime Minister is alleged to have said 1 the following words in response to a question from a Member of Parliament: "...ukifanya fujo umeambiwa usifanye hiki ukaamua kukaidi utapigwa tu... nami nasema muwapige tu kwa sababu hamna namna nyingine kwa maana tumechoka..." The petitioners have provided a literal translation of this statement, which runs thus: "If you cause disturbance, having been told not to do this, if you decide to be obstinate, you only have to be beaten up..
    [Show full text]
  • MKUTANO WA TATU Kikao Cha Hamsini Na Sita
    NAKALA MTANDAO(ONLINE DOCUMENT) BUNGE LA TANZANIA ________ MAJADILIANO YA BUNGE _________ MKUTANO WA TATU Kikao cha Hamsini na Sita – Tarehe 22 Juni, 2021 (Bunge Lilianza saa Tatu Asubuhi) D U A Spika (Mhe. Job Y. Ndugai) Alisoma Dua SPIKA: Waheshimiwa Wabunge, naomba tukae. Waheshimiwa tunaendelea na Mkutano wetu wa Tatu, leo ni Kikao cha Hamsini na Sita na kabla hatujaendelea nitumie nafasi hii kuwashukuru sana wasaidizi wangu wote wakiongozwa na Mheshimiwa Naibu Spika, Mheshimiwa David Kihenzile, Mheshimiwa Zungu na Mheshimiwa Najma kwa kazi nzuri ambayo wameifanya wiki nzima kutuendeshea mjadala wetu wa bajeti. (Makofi) Sasa leo hapa ndio siku ya maamuzi ambayo kila Mbunge anapaswa kuwa humu ndani, kwa Mbunge ambaye Spika hana taarifa yake na hatapiga kura hapa leo hilo la kwake yeye. (Makofi) Katibu. NDG. NENELWA MWIHAMBI – KATIBU WA BUNGE: MASWALI NA MAJIBU SPIKA: Maswali na tunaanza na Ofisi ya Rais, Tawala za Mikoa na Serikali za Mitaa, swali la Mheshimiwa Deus Clement Sangu, Mbunge wa Kwela. 1 NAKALA MTANDAO(ONLINE DOCUMENT) Na. 465 Ujenzi wa Makao Makuu ya Halmashauri Katika Mji wa Laela MHE. DEUS C. SANGU aliuliza:- Je, ni lini Serikali itakamilisha ujenzi wa Ofisi za Makao Makuu ya Halmashauri ya Sumbawanga katika Mji wa Laela baada ya agizo la Serikali la kuhamisha Makao Makuu? SPIKA: Majibu ya swali hilo muhimu la watu wa Kwela, Mheshimiwa Naibu Waziri - TAMISEMI, Mheshimiwa Dkt. Festo Dugange tafadhali. NAIBU WAZIRI, OFISI YA RAIS, TAWALA ZA MIKOA NA SERIKALI ZA MITAA (MHE. DKT. FESTO J. DUGANGE) alijibu:- Mheshimiwa Spika, kwa niaba ya Waziri wa Nchi, Ofisi ya Rais -TAMISEMI, naomba kujibu swali la Mheshimiwa Deus Clement Sangu, Mbunge wa Jimbo la Kwela kama ifuatavyo:- Mheshimiwa Spika, Halmashauri ya Wilaya ya Sumbawanga ni miongoni mwa Halmashauri 30 zilizohamia kwenye maeneo mapya ya utawala mwaka 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Jamhuri and the Bribe Offer1
    AKU- 14- 0006.0 Graduate School of Media and Communications • • This is one in a group of cases the Case Consortium @ Columbia developed in conjunction with the Aga Khan University Graduate School of Media and Communications (a Consortium member at the time). The cases, which look at various aspects of journalism practice in East Africa and South Africa, are being distributed under an agreement with Columbia University (and will be available on the AKU website). Spike or Suffer? Jamhuri and the Bribe Offer1 In January 2012, Deodatus Balile—managing editor of the weekly Jamhuri newspaper— obtained documents suggesting improprieties in the privatization of Shirika La Usafiri Dar es Salaam (UDA), or Dar es Salaam Transport Company, the city’s commuter bus company valued at Tanzanian shillings (TZS) 12 billion ($7.6 million). Quality Group Ltd, one of the biggest conglomerates in Tanzania, in early 2011 had lost its bid for UDA. Balile had letters indicating that, instead of accepting the decision, Quality Group had gone directly to two parliamentary committees and the finance minister to ask for reconsideration. This was illegal, and violated the Public Procurement Act, which required all complaints be directed to the Central Tender Board. But before publishing a story, Balile had to confirm the authenticity of the letters and give Quality Group an opportunity to comment. He called the assistant to Yusuf Manji, chief executive officer of Quality Group, but no one answered the phone. So Balile went to his office. The assistant wasn’t there, so Balile left a note explaining the story and requesting comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania Human Rights Report 2008
    Legal and Human Rights Centre Tanzania Human Rights Report 2008: Progress through Human Rights Funded By; Embassy of Finland Embassy of Norway Embassy of Sweden Ford Foundation Oxfam-Novib Trocaire Foundation for Civil Society i Tanzania Human Rights Report 2008 Editorial Board Francis Kiwanga (Adv.) Helen Kijo-Bisimba Prof. Chris Maina Peter Richard Shilamba Harold Sungusia Rodrick Maro Felista Mauya Researchers Godfrey Mpandikizi Stephen Axwesso Laetitia Petro Writers Clarence Kipobota Sarah Louw Publisher Legal and Human Rights Centre LHRC, April 2009 ISBN: 978-9987-432-74-5 ii Acknowledgements We would like to recognize the immense contribution of several individuals, institutions, governmental departments, and non-governmental organisations. The information they provided to us was invaluable to the preparation of this report. We are also grateful for the great work done by LHRC employees Laetitia Petro, Richard Shilamba, Godfrey Mpandikizi, Stephen Axwesso, Mashauri Jeremiah, Ally Mwashongo, Abuu Adballah and Charles Luther who facilitated the distribution, collection and analysis of information gathered from different areas of Tanzania. Our 131 field human rights monitors and paralegals also played an important role in preparing this report by providing us with current information about the human rights’ situation at the grass roots’ level. We greatly appreciate the assistance we received from the members of the editorial board, who are: Helen Kijo-Bisimba, Francis Kiwanga, Rodrick Maro, Felista Mauya, Professor Chris Maina Peter, and Harold Sungusia for their invaluable input on the content and form of this report. Their contributions helped us to create a better report. We would like to recognize the financial support we received from various partners to prepare and publish this report.
    [Show full text]
  • APRA POLICY PROCESSES and POLITICAL ECONOMY: TANZANIA COUNTRY REVIEW Colin Poulton1
    APRA POLICY PROCESSES AND POLITICAL ECONOMY: TANZANIA COUNTRY REVIEW Colin Poulton1 WP 05 Working Paper October 2017 CONTENTS 1 Introduction...................................................................................................................................6 2 Electoral trends in Tanzania........................................................................................................8 3 How does CCM retain power?....................................................................................................9 3.1 Where does agricultural policy fit into this?.......................................................................11 4 The rise of medium-scale and large-scale farms in Tanzania...............................................14 4.1 Large-scale farming in Tanzania.......................................................................................14 4.2 The rise of medium-scale farms.......................................................................................15 4.3 Economic and political dynamics.....................................................................................15 4.4 Land acquisition..............................................................................................................17 5 Contested policy narratives around agricultural commercialisation....................................19 5.1 Agricultural Sector Development Strategy (2001).............................................................19 5.2 Kilimo Kwanza (2009)......................................................................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • Majina Ya Vijana Waliochaguliwa Kwenda Msange Jkt - Tabora
    MAJINA YA VIJANA WALIOCHAGULIWA KWENDA MSANGE JKT - TABORA S/NO JINA LA SHULE JINSIA MAJINA KAMILI 1 GALANOS SECONDARY SCHOOL M ABDALLAH OMARI MBWANA 2 BAOBAB SECONDARY SCHOOL M ABDALLAH OMARY JUMA 3 LIVING STONE BOYS' SEMINARY M ABDALLAH OMARY KILUA 4 EMANUEL NCHIMBI SECONDARY SCHOOL M ABDALLAH R HAMADI 5 LUGOBA SECONDARY SCHOOL M ABDALLAH R JONGO 6 NACHINGWEA SECONDARY SCHOOL M ABDALLAH R MKONDO 7 BENJAMIN WILLIAM MKAPA SECONDARY SCHOOL M ABDALLAH R MOHAMEDI 8 MAHIWA SECONDARY SCHOOL M ABDALLAH RAJABU ABDALLAH 9 MATAI SECONDARY SCHOOL M ABDALLAH RAMADHAN MILAHULA 10 RANGWI SECONDARY SCHOOL M ABDALLAH RAMADHANI MALIKA 11 BUGENE SECONDARY SCHOOL M ABDALLAH RAMADHANI PEMBELA 12 KAHORORO SECONDARY SCHOOL M ABDALLAH RASHID JUMA 13 MOSHI SECONDARY SCHOOL M ABDALLAH RAZAKI HAMISI 14 BENJAMIN WILLIAM MKAPA SECONDARY SCHOOL M ABDALLAH S ABDALLAH 15 KILWA SECONDARY SCHOOL M ABDALLAH S CHOMBINGA 16 GALANOS SECONDARY SCHOOL M ABDALLAH S KIATU 17 GEITA SECONDARY SCHOOL M ABDALLAH S SHITUNGULU 18 ISONGOLE SECONDARY SCHOOL M ABDALLAH SADUN SALIM 19 CHANGARAWE SECONDARY SCHOOL M ABDALLAH SAID NAMTUKA 20 MUHEZA HIGH SCHOOL M ABDALLAH SAIDI MUHONDOGWA 21 MBEZI BEACH SECONDARY SCHOOL M ABDALLAH SAIDI MWIKONGI 22 MAHIWA SECONDARY SCHOOL M ABDALLAH SAIDI MWIRU 23 AQUINAS SECONDARY SCHOOL M ABDALLAH SAIDI NAMUHA 24 SADANI SECONDARY SCHOOL M ABDALLAH SAIDI SALIMU 25 USAGARA SECONDARY SCHOOL M ABDALLAH SALIM HAMAD 26 RANGWI SECONDARY SCHOOL M ABDALLAH SALIMU MUSSA 27 MUSOMA SECONDARY SCHOOL M ABDALLAH SALUM KAYUGA 28 ALI HASSAN MWINYI ISL. SECONDARY SCHOOL
    [Show full text]
  • The Development Gap in Economic Rationality of Future Elites∗
    The Development Gap in Economic Rationality of Future Elites∗ Alexander W. Cappelen, Shachar Kariv Erik Ø. Sørensen, and Bertil Tungodden† January 5, 2021 Abstract We test the touchstones of economic rationality—utility maximization, stochastic dominance, and expected-utility maximization—of elite students in the U.S. and in Africa. The choices of most students in both samples are generally rationalizable, but the U.S. students’ scores are substantially higher. Nevertheless, the development gap in economic rationality between these fu- ture elites is much smaller than the difference in performance on a canonical cognitive ability test, often used as a proxy for economic decision-making ability in studies of economic development and growth. We argue for the importance of including consistency with economic rationality in studies of decision-making ability. JEL Classification Numbers: C91, D81, F61. Keywords: rationality, revealed preference, stochastic dominance, ex- pected utility, cognitive ability, personality traits, development, experiment. ∗We thank Siv-Elisabeth Skjelbred for excellent research assistance. We also thank Raymond Fisman, Pamela Jakiela, Edward Miguel and Matthew Polisson for many thoughtful comments and suggestions. The paper has also benefited from suggestions by the participants of seminars at several universities and the Symposium on Economic Experiments in Developing Countries (SEEDEC). We acknowledge financial support from the Peder Sather Center for Advanced Study (An International Research and Educational Collaboration between the University of California, Berkeley, and Nor- way), the Research Council of Norway (Grant No. 202484) and the National Science Foundation (Grant No. SES-0962543). The experiments were administered by the Choice Lab at the Norwegian School of Economics (NHH) and the Experimental Social Science Laboratory (Xlab) at the Univer- sity of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • Majadiliano Ya Bunge Mkutano Wa Kumi Na Sita
    Hii ni Nakala ya Mtandao (Online Document) BUNGE LA TANZANIA _______________ MAJADILIANO YA BUNGE _________________ MKUTANO WA KUMI NA SITA _________________ Kikao cha Kumi na Tano – Tarehe 27 Juni, 2009 (Mkutano Ulianza Saa Tatu Asubuhi) D U A Mwenyekiti (Mhe. Zubeir Ali Maulid) Alisoma Dua HATI ZILIZOWASILISHWA MEZANI Hati zifuatazo ziliwasilishwa Mezani na:- WAZIRI WA NCHI, OFISI YA MAKAMU WA RAIS (MAZINGIRA NA MUUNGANO):- Randama za Ofisi ya Makamu wa Rais, (Mazingira na Muungano) kwa Mwaka wa Fedha 2009/2010. HOJA ZA SERIKALI Makadirio ya Matumizi ya Fedha kwa Mwaka 2009/2010 Ofisi ya Rais Menejimenti ya Utumishi wa Umma na Utawala Bora (Majadiliano yanaendelea) MWENYEKITI: Waheshimiwa Wabunge jana wakati Mheshimiwa Spika anamalizia shughuli, jana jioni alitawangazia wachangiaji watatu watakaomalizia mchango leo asubuhi. Kwa hiyo naomba nimwite Mheshimiwa Magdalena Hamis Sakaya, atafuatiwa na Mheshimiwa Magale John Shibuda na Mheshimiwa Estherina Kilasi, hivyo ajiandae. MHE. MAGDALENA H. SAKAYA: Mheshimiwa Mwenyekiti, naomba nichukue nafasi hii kukushukuru sana kwa kunipa nafasi ili niweze kuchangia hoja iliyoko mbele yetu. Pia nawapongeza Waheshimiwa Mawaziri wote wa Menejimenti ya 1 Utumishi wa Umma, pamoja na Utawala Bora kwa kuweza kuandaa hotuba hii na kuileta hapa Bungeni ili tuweze kuijadili. Mheshimiwa Mwenyekiti, niende moja kwa moja kwenye mchango wangu, mchango wa kwanza unaenda kwenye utendaji wa watumishi hasa Serikalini, imekuwa ni jambo la kawaida kwamba kuna utendaji duni sana kwa watumishi umma usiokuwa na tija kwa taifa. Watumishi wanafanya kazi bila malengo mkuu wa kitengo anakaa mahali mwezi mzima kwenye idara yake hajawa na malengo kwamba amelenga wapi kwa hiyo mwanzo wa mwezi hana malengo kwamba mwisho wa mwezi atakuwa amezalisha kitu gani.
    [Show full text]
  • Consequences for Women's Leadership
    The Politics Behind Gender Quotas: Consequences for Women’s Leadership Equity in African Legislatures by Christie Marie Arendt B.A. in Interdisciplinary Studies in Social Science, May 2004, Michigan State University M.A. in International Affairs, May 2006, The George Washington University A Dissertation submitted to The Faculty of The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 31, 2017 Dissertation directed by Kimberly J. Morgan Professor of Political Science and International Affairs The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University certifies that Christie Marie Arendt has passed the Final Examination for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy as of December 16, 2016. This is the final and approved form of the dissertation. The Politics Behind Gender Quotas: Consequences for Women’s Leadership Equity in African Legislatures Christie Marie Arendt Dissertation Research Committee: Kimberly J. Morgan, Professor of Political Science and International Affairs, Dissertation Director Jennifer Brinkerhoff, Professor of International Affairs, International Business, and Public Policy & Public Administration Eric Kramon, Assistant Professor of Political Science and International Affairs, Committee Member ii © Copyright 2017 by Christie Marie Arendt All rights reserved iii Dedication To my parents, Anne and Steve Arendt, none of this was possible without your enduring love and support. iv Acknowledgments This dissertation benefitted from the encouragement and guidance of a number of people. As an alumna of The George Washington University’s Elliott School of International Affairs, I knew that GW would provide a perfect environment to pursue my doctoral studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Law 2019 Lihiru Victoria.Pdf
    Participatory Constitutional Reforms vs. Realization of Equal Representation of Men and Women in the Parliaments: A Study of Kenya, Rwanda and Tanzania By Victoria Melkisedeck Lihiru- LHRVIC001/1555440 Thesis Submitted for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHYTown in the Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law of the UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN. August 2019Cape of University Supervisor: Associate Professor Waheeda Amien The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgementTown of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Cape Published by the University ofof Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University COPYRIGHT The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or noncommercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. i DECLARATION I, Victoria Melkisedeck Lihiru, hereby declare that the work on which this thesis is based is my original work (except where acknowledgments indicate otherwise) and that neither the whole work nor any part of it has been, is being, or is to be submitted for another degree in this or any other university. I authorise the university to reproduce for the purpose of research either the whole or any portion of the contents in any manner whatsoever.
    [Show full text]
  • The Extractive Resource Industry in Tanzania
    The Extractive Resource Industry in Tanzania: Resource The Extractive The Extractive Resource Industry in Tanzania: Status and challenges of the mining sector The existing mineral wealth in a country should be a blessing. However the experience in some countries shows that this can prove to be very problematic instead. This publication is inspired by the increasing discovery of minerals in East Africa and the concern about their impact on the future of the region. It argues that if timely investments are made in promoting and implementing good practices in this sector, the problems that have plagued other resource-rich countries can be avoided in Status and challenges of the mining sector East Africa. This report, a product of a process that has engaged various industry stakeholders focuses on Tanzania, which is a relatively late arrival to large-scale mining. It maps out the performance of the mining sector as one component of Tanzania’s extractive resource industry (ERI) and analyses the interactions of the different stakeholders over time. It argues that although there are a number of challenges faced by the ERI sector, Tanzania could yet become one of the best performers in her class. However this will require hard work and investments by all stakeholders. By providing information on the challenges and implications of the current state of the ERI in Tanzania, this report wishes to contribute to the on going discourse and efforts to improve the performance of the ERI in Tanzania in a way that incorporates public accountability and transparency as well as increased participation and benefit to the Tanzanian population.
    [Show full text]