ACTA TECHNICA CORVINIENSIS Fascicule 2
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Revision of Western Palaearctic Species of the Oulema Melanopus Group, with Description of Two New Species from Europe (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Criocerinae)
ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE Published 1.vi.2015 Volume 55(1), pp. 273–304 ISSN 0374-1036 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:597F0FC8-27B7-4A94-ABF4-EA245B6EF06E Revision of western Palaearctic species of the Oulema melanopus group, with description of two new species from Europe (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Criocerinae) Jan BEZDĚK1) & Andrés BASELGA2) 1) Mendel University, Department of Zoology, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] 2) Departamento de Zoología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Rúa Lope Gómez de Marzoa s/n, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Five species of the Oulema melanopus group are recognized in the western Palaearctic Region: O. melanopus (Linnaeus, 1758), O. rufocyanea (Suffrian, 1847), O. duftschmidi (Redtenbacher, 1874), O. mauroi sp. nov. (nor- thern Italy), and O. verae sp. nov. (Spain and Portugal). The two new species are described and illustrated. The nomenclature of the group is discussed in detail. Oulema rufocyanea is proved to be a validly described species different to O. duftschmidi. To fi x the nomenclatural stability of the whole group and avoid sub- sequent misintepretations, neotypes are designated for Crioceris melanopoda O. F. Müller, 1776; Crioceris hordei Geoffroy, 1785; and Lema cyanella var. atrata Waltl, 1835 (all conspecifi c with O. melanopus). The primary type specimens or their photographs were examined if they exist. The spelling Oulema melanopus is fi xed as correct and explained. Variation in the cytochrome c oxidase (cox1) gene across specimens of all the species has been analysed. All species in the group had extremely similar haplotypes, with interspecifi c sequence similarities between 90.5–99.5 %, compared to intraspecifi c sequence similarities between 91.6–100 %. -
Historical Background of the Trust
TRANSYLVANIAN REVIEW OF SYSTEMATICAL AND ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH 19.2 The Wetlands Diversity Editors Doru Bănăduc & Angela Curtean-Bănăduc Sibiu - Romania 2017 TRANSYLVANIAN REVIEW OF SYSTEMATICAL AND ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH 19.2 The Wetlands Diversity Editors Angela Curtean-Bănăduc & Doru Bănăduc “Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Ecology and Environment Protection Published based mainly on some of the scientific materials presented at the sixth “Aquatic Biodiversity International Conference” ‒ Sibiu/Romania 2017 ESENIAS Ecotur Sibiu “Lucian Blaga” International Association for Danube East and South N.G.O. University Research European network for of Sibiu Invasive Alien Species Sibiu - Romania 2017 Scientifical Reviewers Emily ADAMS Elsner Research and Consulting, Zürich ‒ Switzerland. John Robert AKEROYD Sherkin Island Marine Station, Sherkin Island ‒ Ireland. Doru BĂNĂDUC “Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu, Sibiu ‒ Romania. Kevin CIANFAGLIONE University of Camerino, Camerino ‒ Italy. Angela CURTEAN-BĂNĂDUC “Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu, Sibiu ‒ Romania. Andrea GALOTTI University of Jaén, Jaén ‒ Spain. Marian-Traian GOMOIU Romanian Academy, Bucharest – Romania Thomas HEIN Austrian Academy of Sciences, Institute for Limnology, Mondsee ‒ Austria. Mike JOY Te Kura Matauranga o nga Taonga a Papatuanuku Massey University, Palmerston North ‒ New Zealand. Mirjana LENHARD Institute for Biological Research, Belgrade ‒ Serbia. Laurisse LUKE Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland ‒ Australia. Weronika MAŚLANKO University of Life Science of Lublin, Lublin ‒ Poland. Pablo del MONTE Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas del IPN, La Paz ‒ México. Sonia REY PLANELAS University of Stirling, Stirling ‒ United Kingdom. Erika SCHNEIDER-BINDER Karlsruhe University, Institute for Waters and River Basin Management, Rastatt ‒ Germay. Teodora TRICHKOVA Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Zoology, Sofia ‒ Bulgaria. -
Revision of Western Palaearctic Species of the Oulema Melanopus Group, with Description of Two New Species from Europe (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Criocerinae)
ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE Published 1.vi.2015 Volume 55(1), pp. 273–304 ISSN 0374-1036 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:597F0FC8-27B7-4A94-ABF4-EA245B6EF06E Revision of western Palaearctic species of the Oulema melanopus group, with description of two new species from Europe (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Criocerinae) Jan BEZDĚK1) & Andrés BASELGA2) 1) Mendel University, Department of Zoology, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] 2) Departamento de Zoología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Rúa Lope Gómez de Marzoa s/n, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Five species of the Oulema melanopus group are recognized in the western Palaearctic Region: O. melanopus (Linnaeus, 1758), O. rufocyanea (Suffrian, 1847), O. duftschmidi (Redtenbacher, 1874), O. mauroi sp. nov. (nor- thern Italy), and O. verae sp. nov. (Spain and Portugal). The two new species are described and illustrated. The nomenclature of the group is discussed in detail. Oulema rufocyanea is proved to be a validly described species different to O. duftschmidi. To fi x the nomenclatural stability of the whole group and avoid sub- sequent misintepretations, neotypes are designated for Crioceris melanopoda O. F. Müller, 1776; Crioceris hordei Geoffroy, 1785; and Lema cyanella var. atrata Waltl, 1835 (all conspecifi c with O. melanopus). The primary type specimens or their photographs were examined if they exist. The spelling Oulema melanopus is fi xed as correct and explained. Variation in the cytochrome c oxidase (cox1) gene across specimens of all the species has been analysed. All species in the group had extremely similar haplotypes, with interspecifi c sequence similarities between 90.5–99.5 %, compared to intraspecifi c sequence similarities between 91.6–100 %. -
Catalogue of Chrysomelini Species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae
Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle «Grigore Antipa» Vol. 61 (1) pp. 23–42 DOI: 10.2478/travmu-2018-0006 Research paper Catalogue of Chrysomelini Species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Chrysomelinae) from the New Leaf Beetles Collection of “Grigore Antipa” National Museum of Natural History (Bucharest) (Part III) Sanda MAICAN1, *, Rodica SERAFIM2 1Institute of Biology Bucharest of Romanian Academy, 296 Splaiul Independenţei, 060031 Bucharest, P.O. Box 56–53, Romania. 2“Grigore Antipa” National Museum of Natural History, 1 Kiseleff, 011341 Bucharest, Romania. *corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Received: April 15, 2018; Accepted: June 12, 2018; Available online: June 25, 2018; Printed: June 30, 2018 Abstract. The paper presents data on the Palaearctic species of Chrysomelini tribe (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Chrysomelinae) preserved in the new leaf beetles Collection of “Grigore Antipa” National Museum of Natural History (Bucharest). A total of 4,442 specimens, belonging to 21 species from eight genera of tribe Chrysomelini, are listed. Among the rare species in Romanian fauna, stored in this collection, Chrysomela lapponica Linnaeus, 1758, Prasocuris junci (Brahm, 1790) and Chrysomela cuprea Fabricius, 1775 should be mentioned. Key words: Chrysomelidae, Chrysomelinae, Chrysomelini tribe, collection, “Grigore Antipa” National Museum of Natural History Bucharest. INTRODUCTION Subfamily Chrysomelinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) includes aproximately 130 genera with about 3000 species and subspecies. Most of them are widely distributed in dried tropical and temperate areas of the world, but several species occur in Arctic tundra and sandy desert. Chrysomelinae taxa are classified in two tribes, Chrysomelini and Timarchini. The monotypic tribe Timarchini occurs in the Western Palearctic and Nearctic, whereas the Chrysomelini is widespread (Bouchard et al., 2011; Reid, 2014). -
In Quest of a Smart Neighborhood Strategy: How Should Be the Future Eastern Foreign Policy of Romania? Cioculescu, Șerban Filip
www.ssoar.info In quest of a smart neighborhood strategy: how should be the future Eastern foreign policy of Romania? Cioculescu, Șerban Filip Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Cioculescu, Ș. F. (2010). In quest of a smart neighborhood strategy: how should be the future Eastern foreign policy of Romania? Studia Politica: Romanian Political Science Review, 10(3), 537-558. https://nbn-resolving.org/ urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-446643 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de In Quest of A Smart Neighborhood Strategy 537 In Quest of A Smart Neighborhood Strategy How Should Be the Future Eastern Foreign Policy of Romania? ŞERBAN FILIP CIOCULESCU Since the end of Communism, each of the presidential administrations and the ministers of Foreign Affairs tried to forge and launch a new ”eastern foreign policy”, acknowledging the existence of historic threats and opportunities. The first democratic president, Ion Iliescu, remains in history as he tried to normalize relations with the Russian Federation by overcoming the thorny Soviet inheritance and the well-known Russo-phobia of many Romanians, while his successor Emil Constantinescu agreed to the signature of the bilateral treaty with Ukraine, in the hope of acceleration NATO membership. -
Comentariul Ambasadorului României În Ucraina Cornel IONESCU
Strategic and Security Studies Group АНАЛІТИЧНА ДОПОВІДЬ Україна і Румунія після парламентських виборів 2012 року: діалог і розвиток відносин КИЇВ 2013 Україна і Румунія після парламентських виборів 2012 року: діалог і розвиток відносин. – К., 2013. – 212 с. Ucraina şi România după alegerile parlamentare din 2012: Dialog și dezvoltarea relațiilor. – К., 2013. – 212 p. Ukraine and Romania after Parliamentary Elections 2012: Dialogue and Development of Relations. – К., 2013. – 212 p. ISBN 978-966-2157-83-3 За заг. ред. Я. МАТІЙЧИКА Автори: В. АНГЕЛ (Асоціація «Pro-Democratia»; Бухарест, Румунія) С. ГАКМАН (ГНДО «Група стратегічних та безпекових студій»; Київ, Україна) С. ГЕРАСИМЧУК (ГНДО «Група стратегічних та безпекових студій»; Київ, Україна) Л. ПОПЕСКУ (Національна школа політології та державного управління; Бухарест, Румунія) Я. МАТІЙЧИК (ГНДО «Група стратегічних та безпекових студій»; Київ, Україна) Перекладач: Є. ШИНКАРЮК Editat de Y. MATIYCHYK Autori: V. ANGHEL (Asociatia «Pro Democratia»; bucurești, România) S. HACMAN (Grupului pentru Studii strategice şi de securitate; Kyiv, Ucraina) S. GHERASIMCIUK (Grupului pentru Studii strategice şi de securitate; Kyiv, Ucraina) L. POPESCU (Şcoala Naţională de Studii Politice şi Administrative; bucurești, România) Y. MATIYCHYK (Grupului pentru Studii strategice şi de securitate; Kyiv, Ucraina) Traducătoare: E. ȘINCARIUC Edited by Y. MATIYCHYK Authors: V. ANGHEL (Association «Pro-Democratia»; bucharest, Romania) S. HACMAN (Strategic and Security Studies Group; Kyiv, Ukraine) С. GERASYMCHUK (Strategic and Security Studies Group; Kyiv, Ukraine) L. POPESCU (National University of Political Studies and Administration; bucharest, Romania) Y. MATIYCHYK (Strategic and Security Studies Group; Kyiv, Ukraine) Translator: E. SHYNKARIUK The black Sea Trust B S T for Regional Cooperation A PROJECT OF THE GERMAN MARSHALL FUND ISBN 978-966-2157-83-3 © ГО «Група СБС», 2013 ЗМІСТ публікації (Аналітичної доповіді) ПЕРЕДМОВА 4 КОМЕНТАРІ дипломатичних місій 5 Політична позиційність і пріоритети істеблішменту України та 10 РОЗДІЛ 1. -
General Info 5 • Exhibitors 5 • Venues Map 6 • Alberigo Award 7 • Keynote
Index • General Info 5 • Exhibitors 5 • Venues Map 6 • Alberigo Award 7 • Keynote Lectures 8 • Monday 4th 11 • Tuesday 5th 43 • Wednesday 6th 81 • Thursday 7th 117 • Speakers 139 • Page Index 163 Follow #EuARE2019 On Facebook @EuropeanAcademyofReligion On Twitter https://twitter.com/eu_are On our conference app Sched European Academy of Religion Annual Conference 2019 European Academy of Religion Via San Vitale 114, 40125, Bologna, Italy +39 051 239532 www.europeanacademyofreligion.org 2019 Conference organized by Fscire You can contact us at [email protected] [email protected] 0039 051 239532 0039 328 1740066 General Info 1. Fondazione per le Scienze Religiose (Fscire) - Via San Vitale, 114 2. Aemilia Hotel - Via Zaccherini Alvisi, 16 3. Teatro San Leonardo - Via San Vitale, 63 4. Ateliersì - Via San Vitale, 69 5. Palazzo Isolani - Via S. Stefano, 16 6. Museo Ebraico - Via Valdonica, 1/5 7. Palazzo Re Enzo - Piazza del Nettuno, 1/C 8. Oratorio di San Giovanni Battista dei Fiorentini - Corte de’ Galluzzi, 6 Registrations are open at Fscire on Sunday 3rd from 10:00 to 16:00 and every day (Monday 4th - Thursday 7th) from 08:00 to 18:00. The Gala Dinner takes place at Palazzo Re Enzo on Tuesday 5th at 20:00 The EuARe General Assembly takes place at Ateliersì on Wednesday 6th at 19:00 Keynote Lectures take place everyday at the restaurant of the Aemilia Hotel from 13:15 to 14:15 Exhibitors - ATLA - Brepols - Claudiana and Paideia - Routledge - Cambridge University Press - Edinburgh University Press - Oxford University Press - Springer - Palgrave -
The Romania and Ukraine Bilateral Agenda. Perspectives for a Roadmap on Security and Defence Sector and Economic Cooperation
The Romania and Ukraine Bilateral Agenda. Perspectives for a Roadmap on Security and Defence Sector and Economic Cooperation COUNTRY REPORT. ROMANIA Bucharest | 2019 This country paper is elaborated within the project ”The Romanian – Ukrainian Civil Society Forum for Dialogue and Cooperation”, implemented by Experts for Security and Global Affairs Association, Romania and it is supported by the Black Sea Trust for Regional Cooperation, a project of the German Marshall Fund. All the views and opinions belong to the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the ESGA Partners. Cover photo: Angela Grămadă, Experts for Security and Global Affairs Association Content: Introduction Chapter 1. The Romania and Ukraine Bilateral Agenda. Perspectives for a Roadmap on Security and Defence Sector, author Claudiu Degeratu Chapter 2. The Romania and Ukraine Bilateral Agenda. Perspectives for a Roadmap on Economic Cooperation, author Leonela Leca About Authors Project Description Introduction The bilateral dialogue between Romania and Ukraine is a complex one. This feature is generated by the multitude of different interests that the two neighboring states have established over time. Often, the definition of these interests has set the ground for complicated situations, difficult to be appreciated, accepted and solved by the political actors. Following the annexation of Crimea in March 2014, and subsequently the commencement of military operations in Eastern Ukraine, the situation in the region has changed greatly. Vulnerabilities and challenges became more evident, and threats increased in number and complexity. Under these circumstances, Romania has chosen to support the democratic principles as well as the processes of European integration of Ukraine. This type of approach - more responsible and vigilant, has been and is still needed. -
Geographia Napocensis Nr. 2(2015)-BT
Geographia Napocensis Anul IX, Nr. 2, 2015 THE CONFLICTS ON THE ROMANIAN-UKRAINIAN BORDER, A STRUGGLE FOR THE DANUBE MOUTHS OR AN INHERITANCE FROM THE SOVIET PERIOD? 1 CSABA M. KOVÁCS Abstract: - The Conflicts on the Romanian-Ukrainian Border, a Struggle for the Danube Mouths or an Inheritance from the Soviet Period ? The dispute between Romania and Ukraine has a complex2/2015 nature and goes back to the history preceding the existence of both national states. The territory belonging today to Romania, Ukraine and Moldova used to be a buffer zone between the Ottoman, Russian and Habsburg Empires, and the frontier line changed very often even in modern times. However, the presentnr, border disputes between Romania and Ukraine were inherited from the communist period (1948-1989), as the bilateral agreements did not follow exactly the terms of the Paris Treaty of 1947. The consequences emerged after 1997 when, in spite of a new official border treaty with Ukraine, Romania had to addressIX, the ICJ from the Hague on the matter of the Black Sea shelf. Key-words: border conflict, maritime frontier, delimitation, maritimeAN areas 1 Introduction northeastern borders are much older than the The relations between Romania and its existence of the present day states. In a larger neighbours were not always the best, with ups frame, these disputes originate in the particular and downs, changing episodes of partnership, geographical position of our country, situated friendship, periodic cooling, verbal or legal either at the periphery or at the limit of major disputes and even open hostility. That was more empires since its very early history, which than true for our relation with Ukraine, our usually made our territory a buffer zone. -
No. 2 [39]/2011
ROMANIA NATIONAL DEFENCE UNIVERSITY “CAROL I” CENTRE FOR DEFENCE AND SECURITY STRATEGIC STUDIES No. 2 [39]/2011 68-72 Panduri Street, sector 5, Bucharest, Romania Telephone: (021) 319.56.49; Fax: (021) 319.55.93 E-mail: [email protected]; Web address: http://impactstrategic.unap.ro, http://cssas.unap.ro NATIONAL DEFENCE UNIVERSITY “CAROL I” PRINTING HOUSE BUCHAREST, ROMANIA The Centre for Defence and Security Strategic Studies’ scientific quarterly magazine is acknowledged by the National Council for Scientific Research in Higher Education as a B+ magazine Editorial Board: Teodor Frunzeti, Professor, Ph.D., chairman Marius Hanganu, Professor, Ph.D. Constantin Moştoflei, Senior Researcher, Ph.D. Hervé Coutau-Bégarie, director, Ph.D. (Institute for Compared Strategy, Paris, France) John L. Clarke, Professor, Ph.D. (European Centre for Security Studies “George C. Marshall”) Adrian Gheorghe, Professor Eng., Ph.D. (Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, USA) Libor Frank, Ph.D. (Institute for Strategic Studies, Defence University, Brno, Czech Republic) Dario Matika, Ph.D. (Institute for Research and Development of Defence Systems, Zagreb, Croatia) Ilias Iliopoulos, Professor, Ph.D. (Baltic Defence College, Tartu, Estonia) Eng. Pavel Necas, Ph.D. (Armed Forces Academy, Liptovsky Mikulas, Slovacia) Scientific Board: Mihai Velea, Professor, Ph.D. Petre Duţu, Senior Researcher, Ph.D. Alexandra Sarcinschi, Senior Researcher, Ph.D. Cristian Băhnăreanu, Senior Researcher, Ph.D. Nicolae Dolghin, Ph.D. Grigore Alexandrescu, Ph.D. Richard Stojar, Ph.D. Andryi Volosyn Editors: Constantin Moştoflei, Senior Researcher, Ph.D., editor-in-chief Cristina Bogzeanu, Research Assistant, deputy editor-in-chief Daniela Răpan George Răduică, Ph.D. The authors are responsible for their articles’ content, respecting the provisions of the Law no.