Title of the Presentation PILOT SITE BERKOBITZA
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Do Public Fund Windfalls Increase Corruption? Evidence from a Natural Disaster Elena Nikolovaa Nikolay Marinovb 68131 Mannheim A5-6, Germany October 5, 2016
Do Public Fund Windfalls Increase Corruption? Evidence from a Natural Disaster Elena Nikolovaa Nikolay Marinovb 68131 Mannheim A5-6, Germany October 5, 2016 Abstract We show that unexpected financial windfalls increase corruption in local govern- ment. Our analysis uses a new data set on flood-related transfers, and the associated spending infringements, which the Bulgarian central government distributed to mu- nicipalities following torrential rains in 2004 and 2005. Using information from the publicly available audit reports we are able to build a unique objective index of cor- ruption. We exploit the quasi-random nature of the rainfall shock (conditional on controls for ground flood risk) to isolate exogenous variation in the amount of funds received by each municipality. Our results imply that a 10 % increase in the per capita amount of disbursed funds leads to a 9.8% increase in corruption. We also present suggestive evidence that more corrupt mayors anticipated punishment by voters and dropped out of the next election race. Our results highlight the governance pitfalls of non-tax transfers, such as disaster relief or assistance from international organizations, even in moderately strong democracies. Keywords: corruption, natural disasters, governance JEL codes: D73, H71, P26 aResearch Fellow, Central European Labour Studies Institute, Slovakia and associated researcher, IOS Regensburg, Germany. Email: [email protected]. We would like to thank Erik Bergl¨of,Rikhil Bhav- nani, Simeon Djankov, Sergei Guriev, Stephan Litschig, Ivan Penkov, Grigore Pop-Eleches, Sandra Sequeira and conference participants at the 2015 Annual Meeting of the European Public Choice Society, Groningen, the 2015 American Political Science Association, San Francisco and seminar participants at Brunel, King's College workshop on corruption, and LSE for useful comments, and Erik Bergl¨ofand Stefka Slavova for help with obtaining Bulgarian rainfall data. -
7563/11 HGN/Tt 1 DG H 2B COUNCIL of the EUROPEAN
COUNCIL OF Brussels, 10 March 2011 THE EUROPEAN UNION 7563/11 COPEN 44 EJN 20 EUROJUST 29 NOTE from: Bulgarian Permanent Representation to Delegations Subject: Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA of 6 October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders – the Republic of Bulgaria Delegations will find enclosed the notification made by Bulgaria in relation to the abovementioned framework decision. _______________ 7563/11 HGN/tt 1 DG H 2B EN DECLARATIONS AND NOTIFICATIONS BY THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 3, ARTICLE 7(5) AND ARTICLE 19 OF COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 2006/783/JHA OF 6 OCTOBER 2006 ON THE APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION TO CONFISCATION ORDERS The Republic of Bulgaria hereby notifies the General Secretariat of the Council of the following declarations and notifications pursuant to Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA of 6 October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders and the Law on the recognition, execution and transmission of decisions on confiscation or seizure and decisions on the enforcement of financial penalties adopted by the National Assembly of the Republic of Bulgaria on 11 February 2010 (published in the State Journal of the Republic of Bulgaria No 15 of 23 February 2010), which transposes the abovementioned Framework Decision into the law of the Republic of Bulgaria. 1) Notification pursuant to Article 3 of Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA (determination of the competent authorities): (а) When the Republic of Bulgaria is the executing State: The competent authorities with regard to the recognition of confiscation or seizure orders shall be the provincial courts and Sofia City Court. -
1 I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and List of Rural Municipalities in Bulgaria
I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and list of rural municipalities in Bulgaria (according to statistical definition). 1 List of rural municipalities in Bulgaria District District District District District District /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality Blagoevgrad Vidin Lovech Plovdiv Smolyan Targovishte Bansko Belogradchik Apriltsi Brezovo Banite Antonovo Belitsa Boynitsa Letnitsa Kaloyanovo Borino Omurtag Gotse Delchev Bregovo Lukovit Karlovo Devin Opaka Garmen Gramada Teteven Krichim Dospat Popovo Kresna Dimovo Troyan Kuklen Zlatograd Haskovo Petrich Kula Ugarchin Laki Madan Ivaylovgrad Razlog Makresh Yablanitsa Maritsa Nedelino Lyubimets Sandanski Novo Selo Montana Perushtitsa Rudozem Madzharovo Satovcha Ruzhintsi Berkovitsa Parvomay Chepelare Mineralni bani Simitli Chuprene Boychinovtsi Rakovski Sofia - district Svilengrad Strumyani Vratsa Brusartsi Rodopi Anton Simeonovgrad Hadzhidimovo Borovan Varshets Sadovo Bozhurishte Stambolovo Yakoruda Byala Slatina Valchedram Sopot Botevgrad Topolovgrad Burgas Knezha Georgi Damyanovo Stamboliyski Godech Harmanli Aitos Kozloduy Lom Saedinenie Gorna Malina Shumen Kameno Krivodol Medkovets Hisarya Dolna banya Veliki Preslav Karnobat Mezdra Chiprovtsi Razgrad Dragoman Venets Malko Tarnovo Mizia Yakimovo Zavet Elin Pelin Varbitsa Nesebar Oryahovo Pazardzhik Isperih Etropole Kaolinovo Pomorie Roman Batak Kubrat Zlatitsa Kaspichan Primorsko Hayredin Belovo Loznitsa Ihtiman Nikola Kozlevo Ruen Gabrovo Bratsigovo Samuil Koprivshtitsa Novi Pazar Sozopol Dryanovo -
Quarterly Report Second Quarter 2007
QUARTERLY REPORT SECOND QUARTER 2007 April 1, 2007 - June 30, 2007 Submitted to USAID-Bulgaria by East-West Management Institute, Inc., 27 July 2007. The U.S. Agency for International Development Judicial Strengthening Initiative for Bulgaria is implemented by East-West Management Institute under USAID Contract number 183-C-00-04- 00105-00. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION__________________________________________________________________________________________1 TASK I: IMPROVE COURT ADMINISTRATION ______________________________________________________________1 A. MODEL COURTS AND COURTS IN PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM __________ 1 1.1 Support to Courts in Partnership and Other Courts______________________________ 2 1.2 Coordination with the Supreme Judicial Council ________________________________ 5 B. SJC INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT _______________________________ 6 1.3 Improved Capacities of the Supreme Judicial Council ____________________________ 6 1.4 Improved Collection and Use of Statistics ______________________________________ 8 C. AUTOMATION ___________________________________________________ 8 1.5 Electronic Case Management System (CMS) ____________________________________ 9 1.6 Development of a Transition Plan for Automation Activities _______________________ 9 TASK 2: IMPROVE CAPACITY OF MAGISTRATES AND COURT STAFF _______________________________________10 A. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE ________________________________ 10 2.1 Institutional Development __________________________________________________ 10 2.2 Delivery of training at -
The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800S-1900S
The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800s-1900s February 2003 Katrin Bozeva-Abazi Department of History McGill University, Montreal A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 Contents 1. Abstract/Resume 3 2. Note on Transliteration and Spelling of Names 6 3. Acknowledgments 7 4. Introduction 8 How "popular" nationalism was created 5. Chapter One 33 Peasants and intellectuals, 1830-1914 6. Chapter Two 78 The invention of the modern Balkan state: Serbia and Bulgaria, 1830-1914 7. Chapter Three 126 The Church and national indoctrination 8. Chapter Four 171 The national army 8. Chapter Five 219 Education and national indoctrination 9. Conclusions 264 10. Bibliography 273 Abstract The nation-state is now the dominant form of sovereign statehood, however, a century and a half ago the political map of Europe comprised only a handful of sovereign states, very few of them nations in the modern sense. Balkan historiography often tends to minimize the complexity of nation-building, either by referring to the national community as to a monolithic and homogenous unit, or simply by neglecting different social groups whose consciousness varied depending on region, gender and generation. Further, Bulgarian and Serbian historiography pay far more attention to the problem of "how" and "why" certain events have happened than to the emergence of national consciousness of the Balkan peoples as a complex and durable process of mental evolution. This dissertation on the concept of nationality in which most Bulgarians and Serbs were educated and socialized examines how the modern idea of nationhood was disseminated among the ordinary people and it presents the complicated process of national indoctrination carried out by various state institutions. -
Transformations | America for Bulgaria Foundation
Български ------ Read online Many Reasons for Optimism The Teacher Who An Opera Diva Is What’s in a Name? Dares to Move Made: How Dabrava Things Around Aleksandrina’s Story Became The Brava Rositsa Mineva's English-as- “Who's that girl?” The In 1891, Bulgarian historian a-second-language audience’s whispers are Georgi Strezov provided the classroom does not feature directed at the beautiful following description of the rows of desks. Instead, black-clad young woman who village of Dabrava: “It is portable modular tables offer has just come onstage. They located at the foot of flexibility in the classroom quickly subside as the gentle Arisvanitsa, stretching to layout, and seating can be soprano picks up the aria of Bistritsa, a quarter of an hour rearranged to suit the class Leonora, who is waiting for to the border [with activity for the day. her beloved troubadour… Macedonia]. READ MORE READ MORE READ MORE Tell a Friend You like our stories? Share them with your friends. -Share on Facebook A Summer School Transforms Attitudes about Bulgaria’s Socialist Past High school senior Martin Dimitrov signed up for the summer school on Bulgaria’s socialist past to make up for the lack of information on the topic in history textbooks and in the public discourse. Martin wanted to understand the almost universal nostalgia for the period among older generations. Bilyana Valkova heard about the program from her high school history teacher and enrolled because she wanted to know more about the country’s communist concentration camps. READ MORE The Month -
New and Unpublished Data About Bulgarian Ground Beetles from the Tribes Pterostichini, Sphodrini, and Platynini (Coleoptera, Carabidae)
Acta Biologica Sibirica 7: 125–141 (2021) doi: 10.3897/abs.7.e67015 https://abs.pensoft.net RESEARCH ARTICLE New and unpublished data about Bulgarian ground beetles from the tribes Pterostichini, Sphodrini, and Platynini (Coleoptera, Carabidae) Teodora Teofilova1 1 Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1 Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd., 1000, Sofia, Bulgaria. Corresponding author: Teodora Teofilova ([email protected]) Academic editor: R. Yakovlev | Received 6 April 2021 | Accepted 22 April 2021 | Published 20 May 2021 http://zoobank.org/53E9E1F4-2338-494C-870D-F3DA4AA4360B Citation: Teofilova T (2021) New and unpublished data about Bulgarian ground beetles from the tribes Pterostichini, Sphodrini, and Platynini (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Acta Biologica Sibirica 7: 125–141. https://doi. org/10.3897/abs.7.e67015 Abstract Bulgarian ground beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) fauna is relatively well studied but there are still many species and regions in the country which are not well researched. The present study aims at complementing the data about the distribution of the carabids from the tribes Pterostichini, Spho- drini, and Platynini, containing many diverse, interesting, and endemic species. It gives new records for 67 species and 23 zoogeographical regions in Bulgaria. The material was collected in the period from 1926 to 2021 through different sampling methods. Twenty-three species are recorded for the first time in different regions. Six species are reported for the second time in the regions where they were currently collected. Thirty-one species have not been reported for more than 20 years in Eastern and Middle Stara Planina Mts., Kraishte region, Boboshevo-Simitli valley, Sandanski-Petrich valley, Lyulin Mts., Vitosha Mts., Rila Mts., Pirin Mts., Slavyanka Mts., Thracian Lowland, and Sakar-Tundzha re- gion. -
FOREST DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Gaber Bozhurishte Kalotina 23 Berkovitsa Bankya Stanintsi Calafat
20° 25° 30° HUNGARY MOLDOVA BULGARIA CROATIA ROMANIA 45° 45° FOREST DEVELOPMENT PROJECT BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA SERBIA Danube AND Black COMPONENT 3.4: PRIORITY REGIONS FOR FOREST ROADS MONTENEGRO Sofia Sea Adriatic BULGARIA 0 20 40 60 80 100 Sea FYR MACEDONIA REGIONAL FORESTRY BOARDS KILOMETERS SELECTED CITIES AND TOWNS ITALY ALBANIA DISTRICT CENTERS This map was produced by the Map Design Unit of The World Bank. 40° 40° ROADS The boundaries, colors, denominations and any other information shown OBLAST CENTERS GREECE TURKEY REGIONAL BOUNDARIES on this map do not imply, on the part of The World Bank Group, any NATIONAL CAPITAL judgment on the legal status of any territory, or any endorsement or INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARIES acceptance of such boundaries. 20° 25° 30° 22° 23° 24° 25° 26° 27° 28° 29° To Bucharest ROMANIA Koshava Oltenita Silistra ° ° 44 Vidin Tutrakan 44 Calafat To Zajecar Kula R. Alfatar Giurgiu SILISTRA To Constanta Danube Lom Rouse Dulovo Corabia Kardam VIDIN Kozloduy R. Islaz Turnu Magurele Todorevo Orekhovo Danube Belogradchik Gigen Zimnicea DOBRICH MIKHAYLOVGRAD Nikopol Todor Ikonomov Belene Jantra RUSE RAZGRAD Svishtov Kaolinovo Dobrich Shabla Gabrovnitsa Iskar R. Razgrad Knezha Dolna Vit R. Samuil Kavarna Tyulenovo Montana Bela Slatina Mitropoliya PLEVEN Byala Sokolovo VRATSA Dolni Pleven R. SHUMEN Balchik Dubnik Levski Novi Pazar SERBIA AND Kamenets Popovo Chiren VELIKO Reka Berkovitsa Bukhovtsi Beli Izvor Cherven Bryag Shumen Devnya Vratsa TURNOVO Turgovishte Gorna Mezdra Osâm R. TURGOVISHTE˘ Provadiya Beloslav Va r n a MONTENEGRO Zlatna Lovech Oryakhovitsa Preslav To Pirot Panega Veliko Turnovo Lyaskovets Omurtag VARNA Stanintsi ° 43° 43 Sevlievo Zlataritsa Kalotina LOVECH Staro Oryakhovo Rosica R. -
Letters from Vidin: a Study of Ottoman Governmentality and Politics of Local Administration, 1864-1877
LETTERS FROM VIDIN: A STUDY OF OTTOMAN GOVERNMENTALITY AND POLITICS OF LOCAL ADMINISTRATION, 1864-1877 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Mehmet Safa Saracoglu ***** The Ohio State University 2007 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Carter Vaughn Findley, Adviser Professor Jane Hathaway ______________________ Professor Kenneth Andrien Adviser History Graduate Program Copyright by Mehmet Safa Saracoglu 2007 ABSTRACT This dissertation focuses on the local administrative practices in Vidin County during 1860s and 1870s. Vidin County, as defined by the Ottoman Provincial Regulation of 1864, is the area that includes the districts of Vidin (the administrative center), ‛Adliye (modern-day Kula), Belgradcık (Belogradchik), Berkofça (Bergovitsa), İvraca (Vratsa), Rahova (Rahovo), and Lom (Lom), all of which are located in modern-day Bulgaria. My focus is mostly on the post-1864 period primarily due to the document utilized for this dissertation: the copy registers of the county administrative council in Vidin. Doing a close reading of these copy registers together with other primary and secondary sources this dissertation analyzes the politics of local administration in Vidin as a case study to understand the Ottoman governmentality in the second half of the nineteenth century. The main thesis of this study contends that the local inhabitants of Vidin effectively used the institutional framework of local administration ii in this period of transformation in order to devise strategies that served their interests. This work distances itself from an understanding of the nineteenth-century local politics as polarized between a dominating local government trying to impose unprecedented reforms designed at the imperial center on the one hand, and an oppressed but nevertheless resistant people, rebelling against the insensitive policies of the state on the other. -
Forestry: Bridge to the Future” Is Financially Supported By: Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Forestry Mondi LTD of Bulgaria;
Book of Abstracts FORESTRY Bridge to the Future International Conference, 5–8 May, 2021, Sofia, Bulgaria The International Scientific Conference “Forestry: Bridge to the Future” is financially supported by: Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Forestry Mondi LTD of Bulgaria; Northwestern State Forestry Enterprise, Vraca Andreas Stihl, Bulgaria North Central State Forestry Enterprise, Gabrovo National Association of Owners of Non-State Forests “Gorovladeletz” Northeastern State Forestry Enterprise, Shumen Southwestern State Forestry Enterprise, Blagoevgrad South Central State Forestry Enterprise, Smolyan Southeastern State Forestry Enterprise, Sliven The International Scientific Conference “Forestry: Bridge to the Future” is organizing supported by: Editors: Marius Dimitrov, Svetoslav Anev, Stanimir Stoilov Pre-pres: Svetoslav Anev Cover design: Svetoslav Anev University of Forestry, Sofia, Bulgaria https://ltu.bg/ Ysabeau Infant; Vollkorn ISBN: 978-954-332-183-4 Book of Abstracts FORESTRY Bridge to the Future International Conference, 5–8 May, 2021, Sofia, Bulgaria Organizing Committee International Scientific Committee Honorable Chairman: Prof. DSc. Ivan ILIEV Chair: Marius DIMITROV – University of Forestry, Sofia, Bulgaria – Rector of the University of Forestry, Sofia, Vice-chair: Nasko ILIEV – University of Forestry, Sofia, Bulgaria Bulgaria Secretary: Momchil PANAYOTOV – University of Forestry, Sofia, Bulgaria Members: Chairman: Assoc. prof. Dr. Marius DIMITROV Alexandar TASHEV – University of Forestry, Sofia, Bulgaria – Dean of the -
Study on the Branches of Traditional Culture Of
Project “Discover Rroma treasures” System code: ROBG - 410 Funded under INTERREG V-A Romania-Bulgaria Programme Value of EU funding: 358 051,22 Euros ERDF Name of the study STUDY ON THE BRANCHES OF TRADITIONAL CULTURE OF ROMANI PEOPLE IN MONTANA DISTRICT P I C, Pltd 2019 www.interregrobg.eu CONTENTS Introduction 2 Section I: Romani people in Bulgaria 4 1. Resettlement, statistics and ethnic differentiation 4 2. Customs, traditions and culture of the Romani people 6 2.1. Customs and traditions 6 2.2. Romani people culture 10 2.2.1. Romani people’s spiritual culture 11 2.2.2. Romani people’s holidays 12 2.2.3. Romani people’s material culture. Traditional crafts 16 3. Basic Romani people’s groups in Bulgaria 19 3.1. Yerlii 19 Dasicane Roma 20 Horahane Roma 20 Kalaydzhii (Tinkers) 21 3.2. Kardarashi/Kalderashi 21 3.3. Ludari / Rudari 22 3.4. Other Romani people’s groups 22 Section II: Romani people in Montana District 24 1. Basic Romani culture groups in Montana District 24 2. Ethnic self-determination. Persons with Romani self-awareness on the territory of 25 Montana District 3. Trends and problems among Romani people community in Montana District 37 4. Field study. Analysis of interviews with representatives of Romani communities 38 Section III: Annex 1: Questionnaires of Romani craftsmen / artists – Montana District 41 Berkovska Brass band (music) 75 Annex 2: Identified places of accommodation, landmarks and transport infrastructure in the 76 populated area/settlement of Romani craftsmen / artists. Introduction This study was conducted within the "Discover the Treasures of the Romani people’s" Project, System code: ROBG-410, financed under the INTERREG VA Romania-Bulgaria Programme, with the beneficiary - Regional Development Agency and Business Centre 2000, Montana, Grant Agreement financial aid No 94706 / 21.08.2018. -
Studiu Comun Al Morbidităţii În Zona Transfrontalieră Montana – Dolj
STUDIU COMUN AL MORBIDITĂŢII ÎN ZONA TRANSFRONTALIERĂ MONTANA – DOLJ www.interregrobg.eu 1 STUDIU COMUN AL MORBIDITĂŢII ÎN ZONA TRANSFRONTALIERĂ MONTANA – DOLJ Studiul a fost pregătit în cadrul proiectului „ Creșterea eficienței asistenței medicale municipale în regiunea de frontieră Berkovitsa - Băilesti (HEALTHEFF), codul proiectului 16.5.2.019/ROBG 259, implementat cu sprijinul financiar al Programului INTERREG V-A România - Bulgaria 2014-2020” Berkovitsa 2020 Conținutul acestui material nu reprezintă neapărat poziția oficială a Uniunii Europene. Studiu comun al morbidităţii în zona transfrontalieră Montana – Dolj: pregătit în cadrul proiectului „Creșterea eficienței asistenței medicale municipale în regiunea de frontieră Berkovitsa - Bailesti Bălești (HEALTHEFF), codul proiectului 16.5.2.019/ROBG 259, implementat cu sprijinul financiar al Programului INTERREG V-A România - Bulgaria 2014-2020”; Berkovitsa 2020 2 CUPRINS CAPITOLUL 1: PRECONDIȚII PENTRU DEZVOLTAREA STUDIULUI ............................ 4 1.1. Introducere ............................................................................ 5 1.2. Precondiții pentru dezvoltarea studiului .......................................... 6 1.3. Metode de pregătire a studiului .................................................... 8 CAPITOLUL 2: CADRUL STRATEGIC AL DOCUMENTULUI ..................................... 13 2.1. Documente și reglementări strategice internaționale ............................. 14 2.2. Documente și reglementări strategice naționale ..................................