Download File
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Karamoja Rapid Crop and Food Security Assessment
KARAMOJA RAPID CROP AND FOOD SECURITY ASSESSMENT KAMPALA, AUGUST 2013 This Rapid Assessment was conducted by: World Food Programme (WFP) - Elliot Vhurumuku; Hamidu Tusiime; Eunice Twanza; Alex Ogenrwoth; Swaleh Gule; James Odong; and Joseph Ndawula Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) - Bernard Onzima; Joseph Egabu; Paddy Namurebire; and Michael Lokiru Office of the Prime Minister (OPM) - Johnson Oworo; Timothy Ojwi; Jimmy Ogwang; and Catherine Nakalembe Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries (MAAIF) - James Obo; and Stephen Kataama Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 2 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Background .............................................................................................................................. 3 1.2. Objectives ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.3. Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.1. Sampling methodology .................................................................................................... 4 1.3.2. Selection of respondents ................................................................................................ -
Killing the Goose That Lays the Golden Egg
KILLING THE GOOSE THAT LAYS THE GOLDEN EGG An Analysis of Budget Allocations and Revenue from the Environment and Natural Resource Sector in Karamoja Region Caroline Adoch Eugene Gerald Ssemakula ACODE Policy Research Series No.47, 2011 KILLING THE GOOSE THAT LAYS THE GOLDEN EGG An Analysis of Budget Allocations and Revenue from the Environment and Natural Resource Sector in Karamoja Region Caroline Adoch Eugene Gerald Ssemakula ACODE Policy Research Series No.47, 2011 Published by ACODE P. O. Box 29836, Kampala Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Website: http://www.acode-u.org Citation: Adoch, C., and Ssemakula, E., (2011). Killing the Goose that Lays the Golden Egg: An Analysis of Budget Allocations and Revenue from the Environment and Natural Resource Sector in Karamoja Region. ACODE Policy Research Series, No. 47, 2011. Kampala. © ACODE 2011 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher. ACODE policy work is supported by generous donations and grants from bilateral donors and charitable foundations. The reproduction or use of this publication for academic or charitable purposes or for purposes of informing public policy is excluded from this restriction. ISBN 978997007077 Contents LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................. v LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................. -
Office of the Auditor General the Republic of Uganda Report of the Auditor General on the Financial Statements of Napak District
OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA REPORT OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF NAPAK DISTRICT LOCAL GOVERNMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30TH JUNE 2018 OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL UGANDA TABLE OF CONTENT Opinion ........................................................................................................................ 1 Basis for Opinion ........................................................................................................... 1 Key Audit Matters.......................................................................................................... 2 1.0 Performance of Youth Livelihood Programme ............................................... 2 1.1 Under funding of the Programme ................................................................... 3 1.2 Non-compliance with the repayment schedule .............................................. 3 1.3 Failure to transfer Recovered Funds to revolving fund Account in BoU ....... 3 1.4 Inspection of the performance of Youth Projects. ......................................... 4 1.4.1 Iriir T/C Youth Motor cycle Repair & sale of spare parts project ............... 4 1.4.2 Let's Teach The Nation Youth MDD Group .................................................. 4 2.0 Implementation of the Uganda road Funds ................................................... 5 2.1 Status of implementation ............................................................................... 6 2.1.1 Routine manual maintenance ........................................................................... -
Download the Full Annual Report 2016
UGANDA CHANGE AGENT ASSOCIATION ANNUAL SUMMARY REPORT 2016 Women groups supported by UCAA with funding from Women’s Bank Finland, through Finn Church Aid interacting with visitors from Women Bank. Review of 2016 During the year 2016 UCAA implemented activities that contributed to its Vision: An empowered and self-reliant society living in harmony with dignity and its mission of promoting the participation of rural communities in the decision -making process through knowledge and skills training for self-reliance and equitable development. The implemented activities fed into the programme thematic areas of the 2014-2016 Strategic Plan. Below are the achievements per thematic area. Specifc objective: To contribute towards livelihood enhancement through, promotion of viable economic ac- tivities for self-reliance and sustainable development of the most impoverished rural communities. As a means to achieve this objective, UCAA conducted the following activities. • Trained women in VSLA in Gulu and Oyam districts: A total of 60 women had been trained in 2016. The number has now accumulated to 300 women trained since 2015.These women have been able to utelise the skills and have started up income generating activities. This has enabled them to provide for their fam- ilies, for example paying school fees for their children meeting medication bills etc. • Review Meetings. Four Review meetings were conducted for the project in Northern Uganda 2 UGANDA CHANGE AGENT ASSOCIATION ANNUAL REPORT 2016 The photo above shows women in group work exercise. • Trained Self-help groups in Vil- lage savings and loans associ- ation Methodologies (VSLA) in Napak • District. A total of 25 participants (12 Female and 13 Male) attend- ed VSLA training at Kangole C.O.U. -
NAPAK District Family Planning - Costed Implementation Plan 2018/19 - 2022/23
REPUBLIC OF UGANDA NAPAK District Family Planning - Costed Implementation Plan 2018/19 - 2022/23 JUNE 2018 NAPAK DISTRICT LOCAL GOVERNMENT This District Family Planning Costed Implementation Plan has been made possible with the technical support from the Ministry of Health and the United Nations Population Fund through Napak District Health Office. This project was funded by UK aid from the UK government. Copyright ©: Napak District Local Government Ownership: Reproduction of this plan for educational or other non-commercial purposes, is authorized without permission from the Napak District Local Government, provided the source is fully acknowledged. Recommended Citation: Napak District (2018). District Family Planning Costed Implementation Plan, 2018/19 – 2022/23. Napak, Uganda Copies available from: Napak District Health Office iv Foreword Napak District Family Planning Costed Implementation Plan 2018/19 - 2022/23 focuses on ensuring that the resources envelope is increased to support women and men raise manageable families. The plan will be able to guide the district family The district pledges continued unity to uplift and planning program so that more women and men respect the reproductive health and family planning access the services, consequently improving health needs of the sexually active women and men to and wellbeing of families, promoting maternal and reduce the unmet need for family planning. The child survival, reducing fertility, dependency and District FP- CIP is both an implementation plan and thereby, transforming -
Karamoja, Uganda Enhanced Market Analysis 2016
FEWS NET Uganda Enhanced Market Analysis 2016 KARAMOJA, UGANDA ENHANCED MARKET ANALYSIS 2016 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Chemonics International Inc. for the Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET), contract number AID-OAA-I-12-00006. The authors’ views Famineexpressed Early in Warningthis publication Systems do Network not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency i for International Development or the United States government. FEWS NET Uganda Enhanced Market Analysis 2016 About FEWS NET Created in response to the 1984 famines in East and West Africa, the Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET) provides early warning and integrated, forward-looking analysis of the many factors that contribute to food insecurity. FEWS NET aims to inform decision makers and contribute to their emergency response planning; support partners in conducting early warning analysis and forecasting; and, provide technical assistance to partner-led initiatives. To learn more about the FEWS NET project, please visit http://www.fews.net Acknowledgments FEWS NET gratefully acknowledges the network of partners in Uganda who contributed time, analysis, and data to make this report possible. See the list of participants and their organizations in Annexes 1 and 3. Famine Early Warning Systems Network ii FEWS NET Uganda Enhanced Market Analysis 2016 Table of Contents Preface ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ -
UG-Education-28 A3 05Aug2010 Napak District Education Accessbility by Sub County
IMU, UNOCHA Uganda http://www.ugandaclusters.ug http://ochaonline.un.org NAPAK DISTRICT: Education Accessibility in Sub-County (July 2010) kk k k National Standard for Primary Schools k k k School Access Minimum one primary school per Parish k Distance to School Maximum 2.5km k Teacher/Pupil Ratio 1:55 (Qualified teacher) k Female Teacher Atleast one per school k Minimum 4 semi-permanent house with Teacher Accomodation k separate housing for female Class room/Pupil Ratio 1:55 Desk/Pupil Ratio 1:3 Textbook/Pupil Ratio 1:3 KOTIDO 1:40 (separate for boys & girls, with hand Stance/Pupil Ratio washing facilities) Drinking water access Maximum 200 metres Playground Savek for boys and girls Food Minimum 1 meal per day at school Inspector/Schools Ratio 1:40 kk Source: Gulu District k k k k k MOROTO k k k ABIM k k k k SOUTH k LORIKITAE BOKORA CORRIDOR GR KARAMOJA HA k k k k k k k LOPEI kk k k k NAKWAMORU k LOPEEI Lopeei LOKOPO k Lorunget k LOKODUMO k k kKalikong k NGOLERIET k k NAITAKWAE k k k Kalochonga KAUTAKOU k NAWAIKOROT kLokopo Lokodiokodio St Daniel Longalom k Nakicelet Comboni Kautaku k k Kalotom k Seniork LOKUPOI k Kangole Matany Lokupoi NARENGEMORU k Kangole Girls LONGALOM k Kangolek Girls kkLOKORETO APEITOLIM Boys AKALALE Senior Loodoi LIRA k Morulinga Matany k k NARIAMEREGEI NAPAK LOKALI Lomuno k MORUONGOR LOKUWAS Lotome Lotome Apeitolim Senior Boys k BOKORA kk k MORULINGA Lotome CORRIDOR GR Kalokengelk k Girls k k MATANY LOMUNO GRAZING Kokipurat NAKICUMET LAND k LOTOME kLorengechora LORENGECORA kCholichol KALOKENGEL kKaurikine Lomaratoit AMURIA k IRIIRI kKapwat IRIIRI kPilas k k kAmedek k k k TEPETH k kKodike NAKAPIRIPIRIk T School Accessibility by Sub-County in Napak DistrictKATAKWI k NGOLE Nabwal k Total IRIIRI LOKOPO LOPEI LOTOME MATANY k k RIET Total Population (2010 Projection) 176500 37400 24700 22600 36200 32000 23600 k Total No. -
Final Assessment Report on the Proposed Karamoja Region Skills Development Project
Final Assessment Report on the Proposed Karamoja Region Skills Development Project “SUPPORT TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SKILLING UGANDA STRATEGY (UGA160330T)”, November Edition 2016© : Prepared and Produced By Bachu Mubarak [email protected] 1 Acknowledgements The author of this report would like to express appreciation to all persons who have contributed towards the successful completion of the study and finally generating this report. We want to applaud the voices below as: They said it! We are grateful to the Local Governments of, Abim, Amudat, Kotido, and Kaabong, Moroto Nakapiripirit and Napak of Karamoja and its various departments particularly the chief Administrative Officers for their contribution towards the successful completion of the study. The author of this report is grateful to Principals, Deputy Principals, Instructors and trainees of Abim Technical Institute, Kotido Technical Institute, Kaabong Technical Institute, Moroto Technical Institute, and St. Daniel Comboni, Nakapiripirit Technical Institute who provided valuable information. We acknowledge with thanks the discussion held with ADP and C&D, as the leading organisations in providing the non-formal training in the Karamoja region. The study benefited from discussions held with various private sector companies and individuals in the Karamoja region, we want to particularly thank Mr Jimmy Lomakol the CEO of Karamoja Private Sector Development Centre for the guidance provided during the study period. The author of this report would like to appreciate the support provided by BTC Country Representative before and during the field-work, and sent in back-up support team that was very resourceful led by Ralph Rothe the International Sector Expert and the BTC Program Officer Rose Athieno. -
NAPAK District Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Profile August 2014
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA KARAMOJA NAPAK District HAzArd, risk And VulnerAbility Profile August 2014 NAPAK HAZARD, RISK AND VULNERABILITY PROFILE | i With support from: United Nations Development Programme Plot 11, Yusuf Lule Road P.O. Box 7184 Kampala, Uganda For more information: www.undp.org ii | NAPAK HAZARD, RISK AND VULNERABILITY PROFILE Contents Acronyms ................................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgement .......................................................................................................1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................2 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................3 Objectives ...................................................................................................................3 Methodology ................................................................................................................3 Overview of the District ...............................................................................................6 Location ...................................................................................................................6 Historical Background and Administrative Arrangement .........................................6 Vision ........................................................................................................................6 -
Rcdf Projects in Napak District, Uganda
Rural Communications Development Fund (RCDF) RCDF PROJECTS IN NAPAK DISTRICT, UGANDA MAP O F N AP AK SH O W IN G S U B C O U N TIE S N Lo p ei Ng o le riet Lo ko po Ma t an y Lo to m e Iriiri 3 0 3 6 Km s UCC Support through the RCDF Programme Uganda Communications Commission Plot 42 -44, Spring road, Bugolobi P.O. Box 7376 Kampala, Uganda Tel: + 256 414 339000/ 312 339000 Fax: + 256 414 348832 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.ucc.co.ug 1 Table of Contents 1- Foreword……………………………………………………………….……….………..…..…....….…3 2- Background…………………………………….………………………..…………..….….……..….…4 3- Introduction………………….……………………………………..…….…………….….…………...4 4- Project profiles……………………………………………………………………….…..…….……...5 5- Stakeholders’ responsibilities………………………………………………….….…........…12 6- Contacts………………..…………………………………………….…………………..…….……….13 List of tables and maps 1- Table showing number of RCDF projects in Napak district………….………..….5 2- Map of Uganda showing Napak district………..………………….………...………….14 10- Map of Napak district showing sub counties………..……………………..……….15 11- Table showing the population of Napak district by sub counties………...15 12- List of RCDF Projects in Napak district…………………………………….…….……..16 Abbreviations/Acronyms UCC Uganda Communications Commission RCDF Rural Communications Development Fund USF Universal Service Fund MCT Multipurpose Community Tele-centre PPDA Public Procurement and Disposal Act of 2003 POP Internet Points of Presence ICT Information and Communications Technology UA Universal Access MoES Ministry of Education and Sports MoH Ministry of Health DHO District Health Officer CAO Chief Administrative Officer RDC Resident District Commissioner 2 1. Foreword ICTs are a key factor for socio-economic development. It is therefore vital that ICTs are made accessible to all people so as to make those people have an opportunity to contribute and benefit from the socio-economic development that ICTs create. -
Napak DLG.Pdf
Local Government Workplan Vote: 604 Napak District Structure of Workplan Foreword Executive Summary A: Revenue Performance and Plans B: Summary of Department Performance and Plans by Workplan C: Draft Annual Workplan Outputs for 2016/17 D: Details of Annual Workplan Activities and Expenditures for 2016/17 Page 1 Local Government Workplan Vote: 604 Napak District Foreword Section 36 of the Local Government act 1997 devolves planning powers to the Local Councils. The planning process therefore becomes more participatory as opposed to the earlier centralized system where a few Technocrats dominated the process. This did not enable pressing needs of the communities to be clearly highlighted. The district Budget Conference provides a platform for all stakeholders to participate in the planning and budgeting process through declaring resources available from all sources for implementing prioritized activities in the District Integrated Workplan. The Output from this Budget Conference feeds into the Local Government Budget Framework Paper Document and ultimately the guiding document for the Annual Workplan and Budget. The implementation of priorities highlighted in this Local Government BFP will propel the District towards achievement of its Vision, Mission and Goal. The participation of all stakeholders including Central Government, Donor Community, key development partners, political leaders and technical staff by collectively putting their resources and efforts together will enable the District implement its planned activities without duplication of effort. This LGBFP will therefore continue to serve as a tool for increasing the linkage between the DDP, the Annual Workplan and the Annual. The agreed on priorities are a culmination of a long process involving consultations with the Parish development Committees, Sub County and District Technical Planning Committees, and the various Committees of Council, the District Executive Council and the General Council, notwithstanding the contribution of our Development Partners both Local and International.