Storm Water Terminated CGP Nois
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
AMATII Proceedings
PROCEEDINGS: Arctic Transportation Infrastructure: Response Capacity and Sustainable Development 3-6 December 2012 | Reykjavik, Iceland Prepared for the Sustainable Development Working Group By Institute of the North, Anchorage, Alaska, USA 20 DECEMBER 2012 SARA FRENCH, WALTER AND DUNCAN GORDON FOUNDATION FRENCH, WALTER SARA ICELANDIC COAST GUARD INSTITUTE OF THE NORTH INSTITUTE OF THE NORTH SARA FRENCH, WALTER AND DUNCAN GORDON FOUNDATION Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................ 5 Acknowledgments .........................................................................6 Abbreviations and Acronyms ..........................................................7 Executive Summary .......................................................................8 Chapters—Workshop Proceedings................................................. 10 1. Current infrastructure and response 2. Current and future activity 3. Infrastructure and investment 4. Infrastructure and sustainable development 5. Conclusions: What’s next? Appendices ................................................................................ 21 A. Arctic vignettes—innovative best practices B. Case studies—showcasing Arctic infrastructure C. Workshop materials 1) Workshop agenda 2) Workshop participants 3) Project-related terminology 4) List of data points and definitions 5) List of Arctic marine and aviation infrastructure ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION INSTITUTE OF THE NORTH INSTITUTE OF THE NORTH -
Remote Desktop Redirected Printer
%F-% %F-% Page 1 of 26 Opened --Project Name Item Number Unit (f) Quantity Eng Project (VersionID/Aksas/Ref. Description (f) (f) Est Min Avg Max Low Bid Std. ID)------ Bid Bid Bid Amount (f) 286 Listed Low 2nd 3rd Bidder Low Low % of Bidder Bidder Bid % of % of Bid Bid 2017 Sitka Perimeter Fencing & F-162a Linear 20 245.00 612.50 980.00 692,400 08 Gate Upgrades (47258//0) (8 Foot) Chain-Link Foot 250.00 980.00 245.00 0.00 2 Bids Tendered Fence 0.87% 2.83% 0.62% 0.00% 2010 King Cove Airport Fencing F-162a Linear 7,700 0.00 27.50 55.00 1,395,100 06 Improvements (8 Foot) Chain-Link Foot 59.00 55.00 0.00 0.00 (28973/51335/64) Fence 30.37% 30.36% 0.00% 0.00% 2 Bids Tendered 2014 Cold Bay Airport Fencing F-162a Linear 1,126 0.00 100.04 244.00 192,264 01 and Gates [8'] High Chain-Link Foot 59.00 55.23 61.80 73.00 (42046/14-25-1-013/56779/4572) Fence 28.31% 32.35% 31.65% 26.44% 7 Bids Tendered 2010 Lake Hood Seaplane Base F-162a Linear 648 0.00 21.79 30.05 384,465 09 Lake Hood Strip 4 Foot Chain-Link Foot 25.00 30.05 30.00 27.12 Improvements Fence 4.39% 5.06% 4.82% 4.20% (31273/52597/4572) 4 Bids Tendered 2011 Kodiak Airport F-162a Linear 576 40.00 45.00 50.00 22,758,321 06 Improvements, 2011 6' Chain-Link Fence Foot 50.00 50.00 40.00 45.00 (33348/52739/4572) 0.09% 0.13% 0.10% 0.09% 3 Bids Tendered 2013 Girdwood Airport 2012 F-162a Linear 13 54.55 171.93 320.00 415,812 02 Flood Permanent Repairs 6-Foot Chain-Link Foot 20.00 115.00 87.00 315.00 DMVA/DHS Fence 0.07% 0.36% 0.00% 0.00% (39936/55713/4572) 6 Bids Tendered 2009 Northern Region F-162a -
Helicopter-Supported Commercial Recreation Activities in Alaska
HELICOPTER-SUPPORTED COMMERCIAL RECREATION ACTIVITIES IN ALASKA Prepared for Alaska Quiet Rights Coalition Prepared by Nancy Welch Rodman, Welch & Associates and Robert Loeffler, Opus Consulting Funded by a grant from Alaska Conservation Foundation October 2006 Helicopter-Supported Commercial Recreation Activities in Alaska Helicopter-Supported Commercial Recreation Activities in Alaska TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary.................................................................................................................. ES-1 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................1-1 1.1. Purpose of this report...............................................................................................1-1 1.2. What is not covered by this report ...........................................................................1-1 2. Laws, Regulations and Policies..........................................................................................2-1 2.1. Legal Authority to Regulate.....................................................................................2-1 2.2. Strategies to Regulate Impacts.................................................................................2-5 2.3. Limitations on Authorities, Permit Terms, and Strategies.......................................2-7 2.4. Summary..................................................................................................................2-8 3. Types and Consumers of Helicopter-Supported -
Aviation Advisory Board Meeting Minutes August 5-6, 2010 in Unalakleet, Alaska
Aviation Advisory Board Meeting Minutes August 5-6, 2010 in Unalakleet, Alaska Chairman Lee Ryan called meeting to order at 9:05am. PRESENT: Lee Ryan, Jim Dodson, Tom George, Tom Nicolos, Mike Salazar, Mike Stedman, Judy McKenzie, Frank Neitz, Steve Strait EXCUSED ABSENCE: Al Orot, Ken Lythgoe OTHERS IN ATTENDANCE: Marc Luiken (DOT&PF), Rebecca Cronkhite (DOT&PF), Jeff Roach (DOT&PF), Linda Bustamante (DOT&PF), Commissioner Leo von Scheben (DOT&PF), Harry Johnson, Jr. - Unalakleet Airport Manager, Laura Lawrence – Staff to Senator Donny Olson, Representative Neal Foster, Chuck Degnan, Jim Tweto. MINUTES: Approved by the board prior to meeting – via email. Agenda Addition – Add time for public comments to agenda which could happen throughout the day as the public stops in for the meeting. Announcement from Deputy Commissioner: Deputy Commissioner Luiken thanked Chairman Lee Ryan for hosting the meeting in Unalakleet and welcomed new board members, Tom Nicolos and Mike Stedman. AGENDA: Alaska International Airports System (AIAS) and Statewide Aviation Update: Deputy Commissioner Luiken provided an overview of the AIAS. Marketing efforts of the Anchorage Airport include: 1. Plans to hire two key positions - marketing and air service development. 2. Interview with Supply Chain Management for an online story 3. Air Cargo Summit – International carriers invited to meet with representative from U.S. DOT to better understand the unique cargo transfer rights available in Alaska and to review fuel supply issues. The State is conducting a study to review fuel storage and all aspects of fuel availability at the international airports. Public Comment: Junior Johnson, Unalakleet Airport Manager expressed concern over Emmonak Airport not having a village contractor. -
(Asos) Implementation Plan
AUTOMATED SURFACE OBSERVING SYSTEM (ASOS) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN VAISALA CEILOMETER - CL31 November 14, 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service / Office of Operational Systems/Observing Systems Branch National Weather Service / Office of Science and Technology/Development Branch Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary............................................................................ iii 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................... 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose................................................................................. 2 1.3 Scope.................................................................................... 2 1.4 Applicable Documents......................................................... 2 1.5 Points of Contact.................................................................. 4 2.0 Pre-Operational Implementation Activities ............................ 6 3.0 Operational Implementation Planning Activities ................... 6 3.1 Planning/Decision Activities ............................................... 7 3.2 Logistic Support Activities .................................................. 11 3.3 Configuration Management (CM) Activities....................... 12 3.4 Operational Support Activities ............................................ 12 4.0 Operational Implementation (OI) Activities ......................... -
Notice of Adjustments to Service Obligations
Served: May 12, 2020 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. CONTINUATION OF CERTAIN AIR SERVICE PURSUANT TO PUBLIC LAW NO. 116-136 §§ 4005 AND 4114(b) Docket DOT-OST-2020-0037 NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENTS TO SERVICE OBLIGATIONS Summary By this notice, the U.S. Department of Transportation (the Department) announces an opportunity for incremental adjustments to service obligations under Order 2020-4-2, issued April 7, 2020, in light of ongoing challenges faced by U.S. airlines due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) public health emergency. With this notice as the initial step, the Department will use a systematic process to allow covered carriers1 to reduce the number of points they must serve as a proportion of their total service obligation, subject to certain restrictions explained below.2 Covered carriers must submit prioritized lists of points to which they wish to suspend service no later than 5:00 PM (EDT), May 18, 2020. DOT will adjudicate these requests simultaneously and publish its tentative decisions for public comment before finalizing the point exemptions. As explained further below, every community that was served by a covered carrier prior to March 1, 2020, will continue to receive service from at least one covered carrier. The exemption process in Order 2020-4-2 will continue to be available to air carriers to address other facts and circumstances. Background On March 27, 2020, the President signed the Coronavirus Aid, Recovery, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act) into law. Sections 4005 and 4114(b) of the CARES Act authorize the Secretary to require, “to the extent reasonable and practicable,” an air carrier receiving financial assistance under the Act to maintain scheduled air transportation service as the Secretary deems necessary to ensure services to any point served by that air carrier before March 1, 2020. -
Annual Traffic Volume Report 2012 2013 2014
Annual Traffic Volume Report 2012 2013 2014 State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Northern Region STATE OF ALASKA Bill Walker, Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES Marc Luiken Commissioner DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES Northern Region David J. Miller Regional Director Prepared by DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES NORTHERN REGION PLANNING AND SUPPORT SERVICES Judy Chapman Chief of Planning and Support Services Data Preparation by Northern Region Traffic Data Section Scott Vockeroth Randi Motsko Ryan Pierce Hayden Nilson NORTHERN REGION ANNUAL TRAFFIC VOLUME REPORT Volume I 2015 Prepared by State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Northern Region Planning and Support Services In cooperation with U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I Introduction Definitions and Terms Functional Class System PART II State Route Index for Northern Region Road Listings by Route Description PART III Fixed Recorder Index Permanent Traffic Recorder Summaries PART IV Vehicle Classification Summary PART V Vehicle Mile Tables PART I Introduction Introduction The Northern Region Highway Traffic Data and Forecasting Because summer traffic is generally much higher than other section within the Department of Transportation and Public times of the year, the counts are adjusted for weekday and Facilities compiles the region’s Annual Traffic Volume Report. seasonal variations by using one or more associated CCS’s to Engineers, planners, administrators, local governments, and the obtain an estimated Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT). public use the information within this report for work that The calculated AADT then represents the traffic on the specific requires information related to urban planning, construction of traffic link on which the count was taken. -
APPENDIX a Document Index
APPENDIX A Document Index Alaska Aviation System Plan Document Index - 24 April 2008 Title Reference # Location / Electronic and/or Paper Copy Organization / Author Pub. Date Other Comments / Notes / Special Studies AASP's Use 1-2 AASP #1 1 WHPacific / Electronic & Paper Copies DOT&PF / TRA/Farr Jan-86 Report plus appendix AASP #2 DOT&PF / TRA-BV Airport 2 WHPacific / Electronic & Paper Copies Mar-96 Report plus appendix Consulting Statewide Transportation Plans Use 10 -19 2030 Let's Get Moving! Alaska Statewide Long-Range http://dot.alaska.gov/stwdplng/areaplans/lrtpp/SWLRTPHo 10 DOT&PF Feb-08 Technical Appendix also available Transportation Policy Plan Update me.shtml Regional Transportation Plans Use 20-29 Northwest Alaska Transportation Plan This plan is the Community Transportation Analysis -- there is 20 http://dot.alaska.gov/stwdplng/areaplans/nwplan.shtml DOT&PF Feb-04 also a Resource Transportation Analysis, focusing on resource development transportation needs Southwest Alaska Transportation Plan 21 http://dot.alaska.gov/stwdplng/areaplans/swplan.shtml DOT&PF / PB Consult Sep-04 Report & appendices available Y-K Delta Transportation Plan 22 http://dot.alaska.gov/stwdplng/areaplans/ykplan.shtml DOT&PF Mar-02 Report & appendices available Prince William Sound Area Transportation Plan 23 http://dot.alaska.gov/stwdplng/areaplans/pwsplan.shtml DOT&PF / Parsons Brinokerhoff Jul-01 Report & relevant technical memos available Southeast Alaska Transportation Plan http://www.dot.state.ak.us/stwdplng/projectinfo/ser/newwave 24 DOT&PF Aug-04 -
Intertie Options for Selected AVEC Villages
Intertie Options for Selected AVEC Villages Prepared by consultants and staff of Alaska Village Electric Cooperative August 2014 Intertie Report for Denali Commission Page | i Table of Contents Credits ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Prologue .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Economies of Scale .............................................................................................................................. 5 What do Rural Alaska Interties Look Like? ............................................................................................ 6 Methods and Assumptions ...................................................................................................................... 7 Replacement ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Inflation ............................................................................................................................................... 8 N-1 Criteria .......................................................................................................................................... 9 AVEC -
Analysis of Electric Loads and Wind- Diesel Energy Options for Remote Power Stations in Alaska
ANALYSIS OF ELECTRIC LOADS AND WIND- DIESEL ENERGY OPTIONS FOR REMOTE POWER STATIONS IN ALASKA A Masters Project Presented by MIA M. DEVINE Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING February 2005 Mechanical and Industrial Engineering © Copyright by Mia M. Devine 2005 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT ANALYSIS OF ELECTRIC LOADS AND WIND-DIESEL ENERGY OPTIONS FOR REMOTE POWER STATIONS IN ALASKA FEBRUARY 2005 MIA M. DEVINE, B.A., GRINNELL COLLEGE M.S., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Directed by: Dr. James Manwell This report addresses the potential of utilizing wind energy in remote communities of Alaska. About 175 villages in Alaska are located beyond the reach of the central power grids serving the major urban areas. Instead, they are powered by diesel mini-grids. Along with the high cost of fuel delivery and bulk fuel storage tanks, these communities are exposed to environmental hazards associated with diesel generators, including the potential for fuel spills and the emission of greenhouse gases and particulates. To address these issues, Alaska energy representatives are looking to renewable energy technologies, particularly wind-diesel hybrid power systems. In order to determine the economic and technical feasibility of a wind-diesel system, computer modeling of the different power system options must be done. Two primary pieces of information are essential in accurately modeling the expected performance of a wind-diesel hybrid system: the village electric use patterns and the local wind resource. For many Alaskan villages, this information is not readily available. -
Election District Report
Fiscal Year 1992 Election District Report Legislative Finance Division P.O. BoxWF Juneau, Alaska 99811 (907) 465-3795 TABLE OF CONTENTS ELECTION DISTRICT PAGE NUMBER Summaries ........................................................... III - VI 01 Ketchikan - Wrangell - Petersburg. 1 02 Inside Passage . .. 7 03 Baranof - Chichagof. .. 11 04 Juneau. .. 15 05 Kenai - Cook Inlet . .. 21 06 Prince William Sound . .. 25 07 - 15 Anchorage .............................................................. 31 16 Matanuska - Susitna . .. 61 17 Interior Highways. .. 67 18 Southeast North Star Borough. .. 71 19 - 21 Fairbanks . .. 73 22 North Slope ~- Kotzebue ..................................................... 79 23 Norton Sound ........................................................... 83 24 Interior Rivers . 89 25 Lower Kuskokwim ......... ~.............................................. 93 26 Bristol Bay - Aleutian Islands . 97 27 Kodiak - East Alaska Peninsula ... .. 101 99 Statewide & Totals. .. 107 I II FY92 CAPITAL BUDGET /REAPPROPRIATIONS (CH 96, SLA 91) - AFTER VETOES ELECTION CAPITAL CAPITAL REAPPROP REAPPROP DISTRICT GENFUNDS TOTAL FUNDS GENFUNDS TOTAL FUNDS TOTALS 1 21,750.1 35,266.3 0.0 0.0 35,266.3 2 8,223.8 15,195.6 0.0 0.0 15,195.6 3 3,524.8 6,446.1 0.0 0.0 6,446.1 4 8,397.2 19,387.0 1,360.0 1,360.0 20,747.0 5 11,885.0 16,083.9 0.0 0.0 16,083.9 6 5,315.0 14,371.1 0.0 0.0 14,371.1 7 - 15 73,022.9 99,167.9 -95.3 -95.3 99,072.6 16 13,383.0 66,817.2 -20.0 -20.0 66,797.2 17 6,968.5 39,775.5 0.0 0.0 39,775.5 18 2,103.6 2,753.6 0.0 0.0 2,753.6 -
Mid-Twentieth Century Architecture in Alaska Historic Context (1945-1968)
Mid-Twentieth Century Architecture in Alaska Historic Context (1945-1968) Prepared by Amy Ramirez . Jeanne Lambin . Robert L. Meinhardt . and Casey Woster 2016 The Cultural Resource Programs of the National Park Service have responsibilities that include stewardship of historic buildings, museum collections, archeological sites, cultural landscapes, oral and written histories, and ethnographic resources. The material is based upon work assisted by funding from the National Park Service. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of the Interior. Printed 2018 Cover: Atwood Center, Alaska Pacific University, Anchorage, 2017, NPS photograph MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY ARCHITECTURE IN ALASKA HISTORIC CONTEXT (1945 – 1968) Prepared for National Park Service, Alaska Regional Office Prepared by Amy Ramirez, B.A. Jeanne Lambin, M.S. Robert L. Meinhardt, M.A. and Casey Woster, M.A. July 2016 Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 8 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Historic Context as a Planning & Evaluation Tool ............................................................................