Delay Attribution Principles and Rules Is Issued to All Track Access Parties by the Delay Attribution Board

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Delay Attribution Principles and Rules Is Issued to All Track Access Parties by the Delay Attribution Board OFFICIAL DELAY ATTRIBUTION PRINCIPLES AND RULES OFFICIAL DELAY ATTRIBUTION PRINCIPLES AND RULES . Issued by: The Secretary, Delay Attribution Board Floor One, Mimet House 5a Praed Street London W2 1NJ OFFICIAL Version Control Date Section Change Changes Applied All Sections Reformatted to Rule Book Style 01/06/2017 Foreword Updated in line with DAPR changes Section A Updated to reflect removal of ‘Guide’ and DAPR name change Section A New Section A7 added relating to DAB Process Guides Section B Amendment to Paragraph B7.4 relating to Queue of Trains Section E Rewrite of Section E3 TRUST Reporting Errors and Anomalies Section G Expansion of Section G3 relating to ETCS and ATO operations Section H Amendment to Paragraphs H1.2, H2.2 and H3.3 relating to assets 10/12/2017 Section K Addition of new Section K9 relating to stock swaps and revision to renumbered K10 flow diagram to incorporate TMS Section M Addition of new Section M3 covering activities relating to Service Recovery Section N Additions to Section N2 relating to stock swaps Section O Addition to Paragraph O1.1 covering asset failures and amendments with Section O4 Wires Down Section Q Reformatting of circumstance in Q4.1(b) Section S Update to descriptions for Delay Codes FI and TS plus introduction of Delay Codes JR, M2 and OF Section C Amendments to C2.3, C2.4, C2.5 and C2.6 in relation to ‘Externals’ Section E Amendment to E5.1 replacing OP with OU Section M Correction to M3.1(d) Delay Code TP; New flow diagram M3.2 covering Service Recovery elements; 01/04/2018 New Section M3.3 covering failed train recovery Section Q Section Q5.1 improvements and clarification for Severe Weather Section S Title and Description changes relating to ‘External’ Delay Codes Removal of Delay Code OP Section C Addition of new Section M3 covering Planned Incidents and P Coding Section E Replacement of Paragraph E1.1 relating to TRUST accuracy and PJ Code Section F Amendment to flow diagram and updated wording per Rule Book Section L Amendments to L1.4; L1.5 and L1.6 relating to PN, PG and PD Codes 16/09/2018 Section O Amendments to O2.4 relating to TSRs and P Codes and new Paragraph O2.5 relating to attribution where TSRs are allocated as part P Code Section P Amendment to P2.19(a) relating to PF Code and P2.19(m) terminology Section S Update to descriptions and abbreviations to certain J,O, P and X Delay Codes Introduction of new Delay Code OT and removal of Delay Codes PE and PZ Section E Amendment to E6.1 relating to the Special Train Section F Amendment to F1.6.1 relating to ‘planned mitigation commitments’ Section G References to ‘CSR’ and ‘NRN’ have been removed from G1.2 Section H Full rewrite undertaken to improve content, referencing and layout. Section J Amendment to J1.2 covering trains operated by the same operator under a different contract Section L New Paragraph L1.8 added covering trains running with no schedule in TRUST Section O Various changes relating to radio system terminology, removal of IZ and new JF Delay Code 01/04/2019 Section P Amendment to Line Block terminology in P2.19 Section Q Changes to Q1.6 and Q1.7 in relation to bird strikes. Amendments to Q5.4 relating to Key Route Strategy. New Section Q5.13 covering route proving / ghost trains and new Q5.14 covering cancellations with unknown cause. Section R ‘IVRS’ ‘CSR’ and ‘NRN’ entries have been removed from the No Fault Found in R3.5 Section S Various amendments including removal of Delay Code IZ and introduction of Delay Code JF 15/09/2019 Section A Reliability Event definition removed and added to Section B Section B Improvements and additions to the Definitions Section C Removal of paragraphs C1.6 and C1.7 relating to overcrowding Section G Update to G4.1 relating to GSM-R REC Section H Update to H3.3.1 relating to GSM-R REC Section K Addition of a Train Regulation Flow Diagram Section N Additions and amendments to Section N2 covering station overtime due to passenger volumes Section O Complete rewrite and reformatting Section Q Addition of circumstances covering train surfing in Q4.1 Section R Clarification in R1.3 relating to aviation related incidents and use of XO Section S Various amendments including removal of Delay Code XZ and introduction of Delay Code RX OFFICIAL Date Section Change Changes Applied 01/04/2020 Section C Updated table of Delay Code categories and Responsible Manager Codes Section D Addition of Recovered Lateness principles and examples Section E Clarification of new Prime Cause during TRUST failures or loss of access Section F Removal of references to Delay Code FT (removed from Section S) Section K Removal of reference to Delay Code FP Section O Clarification of the use of P Codes in relation to TSR delays. Consistent terms for OHLE and 3rd Rail Section R Note added to No Fault Found equipment table Section S Various Delay Code amendments including removal of FN, FP, FT and MF and addition of FF 20/09/2020 Section G Addition of Selective Door and Power Changeover Balise Section M Addition of a ‘Following Day’ flow diagram Section N Completely re-formatted Section R Further clarification of interface No Fault Found principles 01/04/20201 Foreword Amended wording to clarify the Board’s remit as the overseer of the Delay Attribution process Good Practice Amended wording to clarify good practice in the context of dispute resolution, with reference to Statement the associated Guidance Document PGD 4 Section A A2.4 rewritten to update terminology relating to Network Rail when DAPR principles are applied on non-Network Rail infrastructure networks. Section B New Section B6.17.G and other wording updates covering asset failures involving multiple Routes or Areas. Section C Change to criteria required to use External codes in connection with weather events New Section C1.5 covering delays caused by a train that did not itself incur delay. Section D Clarification of the term “Fail To Stop” Section E Reference added to Process Guide PGD19 as the document related to the capture of TRUST data Section G Clarified wording in Section 44.1(a) scenarios table relating to Railway Emergency Calls. Also, explanatory note added on how TPWS alerts are triggered. Section J Removal of reference to outdated code YG in J1.1. Also, explanatory note added defining “train crew” Section K Clarification on use of code QA in connection with simplifier errors. Section L Non-material reformatting for clarity Minor rewording of L1.4 and new section L1.4.1 covering use of code PN Section M New Section M4 provides attribution scenarios covering diversionary routes Non-material reformatting for clarity Section O Clarification on asset failure or damage caused by rolling stock. Reference to PGD17 added in connection with this. Section P Clarification on single line working/diversions Section Q Reference added to PGDs 6 and 13 in relation to External delay causes. Change to criteria required to use External codes in connection with weather events Additional guidance on the definition of “blanket speed restrictions” and codes to be used when they are applied. Section R Reference added to PGDs 3 and 7 in relation to safety issues Section S Removal of Codes JG, OZ, QT, XD, XF, XH and XV Addition of new codes OR and YV (with associated descriptions) Amendment to descriptions of codes JX, OD,, XK, XM and XN to account for scenarios previously covered by removed codes. Note: Sections not mentioned in the Version Control above remain unchanged in the latest issue. OFFICIAL Foreword This document, setting out the Delay Attribution Principles and Rules is issued to all Track Access Parties by the Delay Attribution Board. The Delay Attribution Board is an Industry body remitted to provide guidance and assurance to the Industry on delay attribution issues. The purpose of the Board (as defined by the Network Code paragraph B6.1) is to ‘Lead, Advise and Monitor the effectiveness and accuracy of the delay attribution process and use of the Delay Attribution Principles and Rules and the Performance Data Accuracy Code’. In this context the Board will: • Oversee that delay attribution is undertaken in an unbiased and transparent manner; • Oversee that appropriate training and competency assessment is available to everyone involved in the process of delay attribution; • Propose changes to the Delay Attribution Principles and Rules and Performance Data Accuracy Code to improve clarity, understanding and application; • Make recommendations for changes to the delay attribution processes to improve its efficiency and effectiveness and oversee the delivery of such changes. This document is updated by the issuing of amended Sections as inserts incorporating Proposals for Amendment that have been agreed pursuant to the process set out in Conditions B2.5 to B2.7 of the Network Code since the issue of the previous document. Consequently, those re-issued Sections supersede those previously published. Proposals for Amendment made since the issue of the previous issue are recorded in the Version Control on the re-issued front page and are supported by a briefing of the changes. Delay Attribution Principles and Rules April 2021 Foreword OFFICIAL Delay Attribution Statement of Good Practice This Statement of Good Practice is issued by the Delay Attribution Board to parties involved in the Delay Attribution Process. It has been developed in consultation with all Industry Parties and the Board considers it has full industry support. While this Statement of Good Practice is not intended to create contractual rights or obligations the Board expect Industry Parties to have due regard to this Statement when participating in the Delay Attribution Process.
Recommended publications
  • Report on Railway Accident with Freight Car Set That Rolled Uncontrolledly from Alnabru to Sydhavna on 24 March 2010
    Issued March 2011 REPORT JB 2011/03 REPORT ON RAILWAY ACCIDENT WITH FREIGHT CAR SET THAT ROLLED UNCONTROLLEDLY FROM ALNABRU TO SYDHAVNA ON 24 MARCH 2010 Accident Investigation Board Norway • P.O. Box 213, N-2001 Lillestrøm, Norway • Phone: + 47 63 89 63 00 • Fax: + 47 63 89 63 01 www.aibn.no • [email protected] This report has been translated into English and published by the AIBN to facilitate access by international readers. As accurate as the translation might be, the original Norwegian text takes precedence as the report of reference. The Accident Investigation Board has compiled this report for the sole purpose of improving railway safety. The object of any investigation is to identify faults or discrepancies which may endanger railway safety, whether or not these are causal factors in the accident, and to make safety recommendations. It is not the Board’s task to apportion blame or liability. Use of this report for any other purpose than for railway safety should be avoided. Photos: AIBN and Ruter As Accident Investigation Board Norway Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTIFICATION OF THE ACCIDENT ............................................................................................. 4 SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... 4 1. INFORMATION ABOUT THE ACCIDENT ..................................................................... 6 1.1 Chain of events ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Road Level Crossing Protection Equipment
    Engineering Procedure Signalling CRN SM 013 ROAD LEVEL CROSSING PROTECTION EQUIPMENT Version 2.0 Issued December 2013 Owner: Principal Signal Engineer Approved by: Stewart Rendell Authorised by: Glenn Dewberry Disclaimer. This document was prepared for use on the CRN Network only. John Holland Rail Pty Ltd makes no warranties, express or implied, that compliance with the contents of this document shall be sufficient to ensure safe systems or work or operation. It is the document user’s sole responsibility to ensure that the copy of the document it is viewing is the current version of the document as in use by JHR. JHR accepts no liability whatsoever in relation to the use of this document by any party, and JHR excludes any liability which arises in any manner by the use of this document. Copyright. The information in this document is protected by Copyright and no part of this document may be reproduced, altered, stored or transmitted by any person without the prior consent of JHR. © JHR UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED Page 1 of 66 Issued December 2013 Version 2.0 CRN Engineering Procedure - Signalling CRN SM 013 Road Level Crossing Protection Equipment Document control Revision Date of Approval Summary of change 1.0 June 1999 RIC Standard SC 07 60 01 00 EQ Version 1.0 June 1999. 1.0 July 2011 Conversion to CRN Signalling Standard CRN SM 013. 2.0 December 2013 Inclusion of Safetran S40 and S60 Mechanisms, reformatting of figures and tables, and updating text Summary of changes from previous version Section Summary of change All Include automated
    [Show full text]
  • Milepost 27 I I October 2006
    MILEPOST 27 I I OCTOBER 2006 VIRGIN GLASGOW-EUSTON RECORD - See Page 227 Milepost 27½ - 159 - October 2006 MILEPOST 27½ - October 2006 The Journal of The Railway Performance Society Honorary President: Peter Semmens MA CChem FRSC MBCS MCIT Commitee: CHAIRMAN Nigel Smedley 40 Ferrers Way, Darley Abbey, Derby DE22 2BA. e-mail: [email protected] tel: 01332 541267 SECRETARY Frank Collins 10 Collett Way, Frome, Somerset, BA11 2XR e-mail: [email protected] Tel: 01373 466408 TREASURER Peter Smith 28 Downsview Ave, Storrington, West Sussex RH20 4PS (and Membership) e-mail: [email protected] 01903 742684. EDITOR David Ashley 92 Lawrence Drive, Ickenham, Uxbridge, Middx, UB10 8RW e-mail: [email protected], Tel 01895 675178 Meetings Officer Martin Barrett 112 Langley Drive, Norton, Malton, N Yorks YO17 9AB [email protected] tel 01653 694937 s Fastest Times Editor David Sage 93 Salisbury Road, Burton, Christchurch, Dorset BH23 7JR e-mail: [email protected] tel; 01202 249717 Distance Chart Editor John Bull 37 Heathfield Road, Basingstoke, Hants RG22 4PA email;[email protected] Milepost 27½ - 160 - October 2006 Archivist & Librarian Lee Allsopp 2 Gainsborough, North Lake, Bracknell RG12 7WL e-mail: [email protected] tel; 01344 648644 Technical Officer David Hobbs 11 Lynton Terrace, Acton, London W3 9DX Tel 020 8993 3788 [email protected] Publicity Officer Jeremy Hartill, 7 Curlow Close, Beverley, N Humberside HU17 7QN. Phone 01482 870507 e-mail: [email protected] Non-committee officials:- Topical points Martin Robertson 23 Brownside Rd, Cambuslang, Glasgow, G72 0NL e-mail: [email protected] Directors of RPS Rail Performance Consultants Ltd.:- Frank Collins (chairman), Martin Barrett (secretary), Nigel Smedley.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Accident Report
    Rail Accident Report Buffer stop collision at Chester station 20 November 2013 Report 26/2014 November 2014 This investigation was carried out in accordance with: l the Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC; l the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003; and l the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005. © Crown copyright 2014 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This document/publication is also available at www.raib.gov.uk. Any enquiries about this publication should be sent to: RAIB Email: [email protected] The Wharf Telephone: 01332 253300 Stores Road Fax: 01332 253301 Derby UK Website: www.raib.gov.uk DE21 4BA This report is published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Department for Transport. Buffer stop collision at Chester station 20 November 2013 Contents Summary 5 Introduction 6 Preface 6 Key definitions 6 The accident 7 Summary of the accident 7 Context 8 The investigation 12 Sources of evidence 12 Key facts and analysis 13 Sequence of events 13 Background information 16 Identification of the immediate cause 21 Identification of causal factors 22 Factors affecting the severity of consequences 35 Previous
    [Show full text]
  • A Round up of Recent Activities in Our Sections
    Section Activities A round up of recent activities in our Sections AS PUBLISHED IN The Journal April 2018 Volume 136 Part 2 Sections BIRMINGHAM CROYDON & BRIGHTON DARLINGTON & NORTH EAST EDINBURGH Our online events calendar holds all GLASGOW of our Section meetings. IRISH LANCASTER, BARROW & CARLISLE You’ll also find full contact details on LONDON our website. MANCHESTER & LIVERPOOL MILTON KEYNES NORTH WALES NOTTINGHAM & DERBY SOUTH & WEST WALES THAMES VALLEY WESSEX WEST OF ENGLAND WEST YORKSHIRE YORK SECTION ACTIVITIES lighting Towers that sprang up on the railway organisation. On one occasion, John was landscape during the modernisation days of called into to record Pickfords moving the A round up the 1960s and 70s. Dickens Inn from one end of St. Catherine’s Dock in London to the other. Photographers were based at the regional of recent offices and in the various railway workshops A less glamorous assignment, but nonetheless which were around at that time. John was fascinating (and unnerving) was recording called in to take pictures of work in progress on the water jets spraying out of the brickwork in activities in new trains and then at their launch. Abbotscliffe Tunnel. This required elaborate lighting to ensure a clear shot could be On some occasions, it was just a case of recorded. Works for the opening of the our Sections. being in the right place at the right time. On Channel Tunnel including over bridge deck his way to another job in Gloucester he was raising and tunnel floor lowering provided a lot able to get in position on a signal gantry at of work in the early 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • Loss of Brake Control on a Sleeper Train Approaching Edinburgh 1 August 2019
    Rail Accident Report Loss of brake control on a sleeper train approaching Edinburgh 1 August 2019 Report 05/2020 May 2020 This investigation was carried out in accordance with: l the Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC l the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003 l the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005. © Crown copyright 2020 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This document/publication is also available at www.gov.uk/raib. Any enquiries about this publication should be sent to: RAIB Email: [email protected] The Wharf Telephone: 01332 253300 Stores Road Website: www.gov.uk/raib Derby UK DE21 4BA This report is published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Department for Transport. Cover image courtesy of Peter Fitton Preface Preface The purpose of a Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) investigation is to improve railway safety by preventing future railway accidents or by mitigating their consequences. It is not the purpose of such an investigation to establish blame or liability. Accordingly, it is inappropriate that RAIB reports should be used to assign fault or blame, or determine liability, since neither the investigation nor the reporting process has been undertaken for that purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Improvements for South Central Franchise Area
    RailwayThe Herald www.railwayherald.co.uk Issue 132 - 23rd May 2008 ISSN 1751-8091 Contents Newsdesk Rail Minister outlines improvements LATE NEWS n LATE NEWS n LATE NEWS n LATE NEWS n LATE NEWS n LATE NEWS n LATE n LATE NEWS to South Central franchise area Page 3 New Stobart/DRS livery for recently outshopped Class 47/4 No. 47832 Page 4 New use for abandoned tunnel Page 5 TURNING THE CLOCK BACK Brian Morrison looks at Stratford-upon-Avon in the 1950s Page 14 Railtour Listings Page 6 Preservation View Page 12 Events Diary Page 18 Front Cover With Severn Bridge Junction signal box clearly evident, Class 67s Nos. 67014 and 67026 arrive at Shrewsbury on 17th May, p Having arrived for the forthcoming 'Cotswold Festival of Steam' weekend, the National Railway Museum's Southern in 'top and tail' mode with the Railway 4-6-0 No. 850 Lord Nelson made its debut on GWR services on 22nd May. It is pictured passing Manor Lane, 08.17 London Marylebone to near Gotherington, heading to Cheltenham Racecourse on the 14.30 departure from Toddington. Jack Boskett Wrexham service. Dave Pagett q One member of the Merehead-based locomotive fleet that is rarely seen in the railway press is the Yeoman- Rear Cover liveried EMD-built Bo-Bo Switcher No. 44. Prohibited from leaving the quarry due to its height, the locomotive is On 9th May, Class 37 No. pictured receiving a general washdown on the apron at Merehead Depot on 16th May. Richard Dunn D6700 awaits departure from Goathland with the 09.50 freight to Grosmont, during the NYMR Diesel Gala.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of Network Rail Standards NR/CAT/STP/001 ISSUE 111 02 March - 31 May 2019
    Catalogue of Network Rail Standards NR/CAT/STP/001 ISSUE 111 02 March - 31 May 2019 Copyright © 2019 IHS Global Ltd Designed, Created and Published under licence from Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd. No part of this document may be reproduced or disclosed to a third party without the written permission of IHS Global Ltd Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd. is part of the Network Rail Group of Companies. i. Contacts Search Support Contacts Please note that it will help save time if you have available your System Number and Company Name. IHS Customer Care For search queries and all other enquiries Phone: 01344 328300 or email [email protected] Other Information Network Rail Standards Subscriptions IHS Global Ltd Phone: 01344 328000 Network Rail Standards Management Publications Manager Nicole Lockwood Phone: 01908 782 481 Network Rail Standards Hard Copy Document Centre IHS Retail Phone: 01344 328039 Fax: 01344 328005 or email: [email protected] Railway Group Standards Rail Safety & Standards Board Enquiry Desk Phone: 020 3142 5400 Website www.rssb.co.uk Network Rail Technical Drawings National Records Group Email: [email protected] Table of Contents i. Contacts ..........................................................................................1 ii. Guidance tor Completing the Standards Challenge Application Form ...........................................6 iii. Standards Challenge - Application Form .................................................................8 1. Guide to Network Rail Standards and Catalogue ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Data Architecture Reference Model
    Business Aligned IT Strategy | System Operator Data Architecture Reference Model V1.0 1 Executive Summary System Operator exists to plan changes to the GB railway ‘system’ to balance the needs of passengers and freight customers and support economic growth. Its vision is to become the recognised expert; trusted by decision makers to plan the GB railway, and its primary output is the national timetable. It is not realistic to expect industry timetable planners to produce robust and resilient timetables in the timescales set out in the network code using the same manual techniques applied today e.g. manual data entry, visually reviewing train graphs, cross referencing against paper-based reference documents, manual validation of junctions using sectional appendix/unstructured TPR datasets/unstructured WON etc., manual stock and crew diagrams. It has been observed that the level of data maturity is low. There is not a common industry data platform, taxonomy or full industry data standard in place. Governed sharing of and access to data is too inconsistent to enable systemisation, and automation of activities associated with timetable production. Furthermore, there is no mandatory exchange format of the data between NR and TOC/FOCs to ensure it is aligned. There are many cultural, process and application issues that account for the current situation but at the root of all of these is the use and quality of the data that underpins all our activities. This data architecture reference model sets out our understanding of the current and future data needs, culminating in the Problem Statements and Target State sections which provide a series of options to consider and a forward view of change across CP6.
    [Show full text]
  • 68409 2009-2010 Pro Coversingle.Qxd:61512 2006-2007
    Proceedings 2009 – 2010 On Operations, On Track, On Train We encapsulate rail know-how into software, technology and services to deliver value for our customers. Our innovative, cost effective solutions answer the challenge of maximising availability, reliability and capacity on operations, on track and on train. ON OPERATIONS Signalling Control Systems Operational Planning & Management ON TRACK Infrastructure Support ON TRAIN Rolling Stock Maintenance Rolling Stock Design For further information E: [email protected] T: +44 (0)870 190 1000 W: deltarail.com IECC image courtesy of Network Rail The Institution of Railway Signal Engineers INCORPORATED 1912 FOR THE Advancement of the Science of Railway Signalling Proceedings 2009/2010 (Copyright Reserved) PRICE TO NON-MEMBERS £50.00 Printed by Fericon Press Ltd (Tel: 0118 945 6100) Cover Photo: Segovia High Speed Line, Spain taken on 26 May 2009 during the convention. Photo: Frans Heijnen 50 years ‘made in UK’ Bombardier Rail Control Solutions From Madrid to Manilla, from Chile to China, millions of passengers rely on our signalling systems every day We are proud of our history in manufacturing leading-edge signalling technology in the UK for over half a century. As a global leader in sustainable rail technology, we have installed signalling systems in over 50 countries, and some of the world’s busiest metros rely on our mass transit solutions. www.theclimateisrightfortrains.com www.bombardier.com 3 Contents Page Contents ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………3
    [Show full text]
  • Cyber Security Risk Management for Connected Railroads
    U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Research, Federal Railroad Development and Technology Administration Washington , DC 20590 Cyber Security Risk Management for Connected Railroads No aProximate Field Logic Proximatea Access Access Needed Controllers Required _____..._ _________ __, Railroad Radio CPS Local or Carrier Network Communications Base Stations Field Linka es Closed Network Short Range RF Balises Accidentally Cleared Signal (tt.g. C&S Testing or Malicious lnJeCtion) . : 8m Block RelayMtal PLC Vital Radio Code ___J~ IT'll_!_l'~ R92~m~ Extralayerof Line Command '\Y' ; 1~ne 1ze/Ac\rvafif protection I , . Lack of acknowledgement False acknoY,,;edgement (~~the-middle) (dispatcher not able to know the 8Ctual status C&S Testing Signal ol blue block relay) MOWlimil Clearing ' '...====='....""'.""."' False Injection ___ Spoofing _____: 110.--•-I I (Attack) I ____________________ J +Work l im it Misunderstood = Risk DOT/FRA/ORD-20/25 Final Report | June 2020 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the United States Government, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the United States Government. The United States Government assumes no liability for the content or use of the material contained in this document. NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • 'On Shed' Journal Material
    ON SHED The Journal of the 8D Association Volume 10, Number 1 : March 2020 ‘On Shed’ : Journal of the 8D Association Volume 10, Number 1 : March 2020 Page 3 News Round Up : Chris Hollins 7 Signalling Controls : Dennis Flood 12 Earlestown Wagon Works Test Train : Rod Dixon 14 Merrymakers, Mystery Specials and Round Robins : Chris Hollins 18 Near Miss at Ditton Junction ! : Tom Temple 19 Unusual Working at St Helens Junction : John Atherton 20 Edge Hill MPD ‘Star Turns’ : Dennis Flood 23 Former Residents of 8D : Colin Turton 24 Once Upon a Time ...... (A Rail Photographer’s Paradise) 25 43924 - First Out of Barry : John Atherton 28 Future 8D Association events From the Editor Here we are - another year and another increasing the number of editions each year. edition of ‘On Shed’ - the first of 4 due to be published in 2020. At a recent Committee In the meantime, I remain indebted to those meeting it was reported that there have been members who have contributed articles for suggestions that, as an Association, we might inclusion in this edition of ‘On Shed’, and I live move towards bi-monthly editions of the in hope that others may be inspired to submit journal. Regrettably, practicalities render the material for publication in future editions. suggestion impossible at this time. In addi- The ‘Future Events’ section on the back cover tion to the financial implications (our printing shows that, in addition to 2 visits to the SEUZ costs have recently increased considerably), a Waste Transfer Station at Kirkby, there is to major factor is the availability of suitable be a varied programme of guided walks led material ! by the Association’s Chairman, Paul Wright.
    [Show full text]