ARTICLE 99

f ) r c l. y e a s i o a as d pe

hi y w t you get f mate icall e oc i g d de stematic ycopepon y y a atum y distinctive Raghuvee because Monodictys f M ( ill y to est were ma \ƒ under 12:12 m ium ecies e sporo V u C p conidiophores; h z o g t m neate taxonom mi . pap li 8(1): 99–105 (2017) 99–105 8(1): nnum scomycot · i by e B

. 2007, H Key words: molecular s morpholog new s # # A taxonom % d “ eas d al sister to V eratin . f rkl s t se ) i # e S to < l kleas

the above conditions can be waived i Be f n these characters remains

a letic and morpholo g D i r f i o y um conc i O t . 2012 ph aracter Be al y MA MA enetic placement of the t ed I h

t g rr f s cruc e easm i e lo f legalcode. Any o er taxa

/ kl y s , incertae sedis ps. h 3.0 n

er / ƒ hi a d enus c B ot g l. 2007, Wan esian inference tr enus despite proli h a y t nnum ons g i ace i i “V\ by-nc-nd ormativeness o / as f < t pl AND METH at the ph e l N. septoconstrictum w as a w g orm appendages, while S ormation, despite the presence o d s f @+]+/ f licenses is the asexual morph of is the asexual morph of / m ae ri c re ze h . conc i a iu l ly B u m ll Pinnoi (

. typ ce i es, eterminin B i ogenet l D kleas nili r y d ec ATERIAL o ampling and isolation of fungi ao & Rao 1964, Whitton X+z ield collections of !*` h \VzV mithi p creativecommons.org // M S F independently in Gatineau, Quebec, Canada and the =V were ana the taxonomic in sterile monili p bearing dark brown dictyoconidia. For example, bearing dark brown dictyoconidia. For m by transferring individual conidia to 6 cm diam Petri dishes using an electrolytically sharpened tungsten containing MEA needle (Brady 1965). Conidial germination was visually % *` placed within the R s Be sporodochia s an boundaries within this pol to be tested by molecular phylogenetic analyses to be tested by molecular phylogenetic enies inferred from Ba *"*`V„V/<“`*"!\V g : lo U+z y

l . , . , , g ound at http: ) y f a e . septoconstrictum l m _ < . Ph N hi erkleasmium concinnum ) u # host ca B ( n i oc d (“A very (“A dea r . concinnum ollowing conditions Lea 1849 comprises B f groap ( i y co

. concinnum y al specimens # . n S m , g and B. crunisia B. nigroapicale this work, which can be ,

f u B , later acceptin "V ate sporo e t , d mi ' . later described the currentl # ) <V rom Lea’s specimen rom Lea’s oda U*$_*; f m eas Neoacanthostigma septoconstrictum is therefore synonymized under um cum

i i u ) *$ " rkl 2 mm mi e # B ( oridesmium easm orormiaceae eas p crones kl acco i to accommo Sp

S rkl er o poridesmium concinnum rom a rotten tree trunk ive rise to brown or black, dr m f B . m t S g Be in Corda 1854 sporodochia. iu ( B . m ) to n m is 2011, http://www.speciesfungorum. l. 2011, iu d @ a a, +E ;U/„A/zz'H/„„+‰*z!/` the name i m species are associated with a variety of sister to t ƒ s g i s e N placed in m kleas uences in GenBank are restricted to 1 y r , with B. micronesicum and q iu sp. nov., based on morphological and genetic distinctiveness. based on morphological sp. nov., . kleas r Be m O . concinnum . Previous phylogenetic analyses based on SSU s: z+@ B ' 1 k Moore 1959 Be devisin e : ( Seifert l um crun y erkleasmium a , i a s i B in Ohio. Zobel h ect under the microscope” kleas c j een connecte ) u r r enous cells that on dead wood b e ve wor : macronematous conidiophores and monoblastic i g incertae sedis rom the copyright holder. Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the author’s Nothing in moral rights. rom the copyright holder. g f c name g ree to share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work, under the ree to share - to copy, Be 2001 i . typ ob f ME 8 · N vat mm gen easm vailable se i y . B U itimatel l A kl co er L g N. thailandicum Berkleasmium a w d d n- er {'|‚ eoacanthostigma septoconstrictum eoacanthostigma septoconstrictum X+z O rowin laced as yet t ener s 'E%' scomata and E<V'“V\ƒE'E o 2017 International Mycological Associatio 2017 International Mycological ;%@ \%<\'/<+ŽV% Article info:V|*`H!*_{z|`z!*_{]|#@!*_ B. concinnum z Abstract: a a / Attribution You are You Z Asexual-sexual morph connection in the type species o type species in the connection morph Asexual-sexual © 1 2 For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms o No N N + permission this study, independent collections of the type species, independent collections of the type this study, obtained from collections and subsequent cultures showed that obtained from collections Berkeley (1845) described were sent to his correspondent Miles J. Berkele were sent to his correspondent Miles J. +=“ŒE%„ fun until his death in 1844, after which his INTRODUCTIO doi:10.5598/imafungus.2017.08.01.07 unknown V prett ne g and LSU sequences of these species indicate the polyphyly of ten species E bearin @ ille @ an #_ Œ %' org/). conidio species previousl p B h e g TanneyTanne & Miller

h dark:light conditions. Specimens were accessioned in the RESULTS /+@Ž„/{ LE Xz„@ < + Ž V% H <V'“V\ #_ C (Champaign, USA; ILLS) and living cultures were deposited sequences and 1277 positions. All Berkleasmium concinnum

RTI in the Canadian Collection of Fungal Cultures (Ottawa, <VƒE

A Canada; DAOMC). z''= ‡‡* ILLS 80804. Berkleasmium concinnum <V ƒ Morphological observations <V ƒ Conidiomata and ascomata from fresh and dried specimens Neoacanthostigma septoconstrictum <““V $# ` E Œ †‰„Ž for the single bp difference in ILLS 80804. LSU sequences Observations were made using an Olympus BX50 light for all Berkleasmium concinnum isolates were identical and „ „ V[^* $$ † N. septoconstrictum <““V $# `{ stereomicroscope and micrographs were captured using an +A¯**$_ "z''%_ " <^'#“„<zŒ /''"!`**# (Lumenera) software. Photographic plates were assembled Phylogenies inferred from BI and ML analyses were using Adobe Photoshop 5.5 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA). generally concordant. However, the backbone topology was polytomous in the BI analysis versus dichotomous in ‚ƒ„`†+@*#+,$"‡ˆ‰*&';,[#*+,$"*"_ @“' sequencing / " X+z E *'' was also discordant among both analyses, probably a result or directly from conidiomata of B. concinnum using the ' ]] % \@X+z<‰@;“ generally higher than BS values. Berkleasmium concinnum //z+V]<<‰@'+ and N. septoconstrictum, including the type species N. X=R fusiforme @H“\// **! *!{ ‰H#!* $ <V“V\ N. septoconstrictum (MFLUCC 151248; and sequenced following the methods of Promputtha & Miller ‰^‡ ‡*_`<Vƒ' !*! et al. (2015). supported clade ;V—$#{]]—*H* Berkleasmium'Neoacanthostigma ' Phylogenetic analyses ;V—#_{]]—! _ Sequence contigs were assembled and trimmed using Helicoma conicodentatum, Helicosporium linderi, # =A"%"* ;z+[ khunkornensis ! <V“V\ƒ cf. huaikangplaensis. #_ƒ@zHH%_ Vƒ<V'“V\ ‰ V!*#%= reveal that B. concinnum is the asexual morph of N. ƒ%=A"<"= septoconstrictum (#, #) and that determined based on the optimal Akaike information criterion ' @@%`+!!‡E' clade (BS = 100; PP = 1). Although not originally reported culture of Botryosphaeria corticiss/;V**$!‡_{+A****# with the description of N. septoconstrictum (Promputtha & was selected as outgroup based on previous analyses @!*!'E% (Sanchez et al. 2012). Bayesian inference (BI) phylogenetic numerous conidiomata of B. concinnum covering the woody @;%#Aƒ substrate along with ascomata of N. septoconstrictum. et al.!*@%/@/ Examining additional reference specimens of B. concinnum (MCMC) samplings were performed with 12 chains (11 'E heated and one cold) with sampling every 500 generations (i.e. N. septoconstrictum) among the asexual B. concinnum until the standard deviation of split frequencies reached Xz„@‡$*`Xz„@$#__Xz„@‡*!$ % ˜ !!* † Xz„@ _ _`‡ Xz„@ * ""# Xz„@ * ""‡ Xz„@ ' *!*!#<““V"!"!{HzM/VBerkleasmium Zobel ! † ‚ /% 1854 is an earlier name than Neoacanthostigma Boonmee %*` et al. 2014, N. septoconstrictum must be synonymized under (Rambaut et al. 2014). Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was B. concinnum, on the assumption that all priority currently performed using RAxML v. 8.2.4 (Stamatakis 2014) in PAUP E % ‡!*! V !!# ended in July 2017. In addition, the specimen previously tree with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Consensus trees were Ž et al. (2016) as N. septoconstrictum %ŒH*‡%| @H“\// * M*‡"{ ‰^‡ ‡*_`  E Vª= % <““V $# `{+A**$_ " for assembly in Adobe Illustrator v10 (Adobe Systems, San based on asexual morph dissimilarity (hyaline helicoid Jose, CA). All novel sequences used in this study were *# † <V ƒ % =;*E% differences and is therefore described as a new species, N. and associated metadata were deposited in MycoBank (www. thailandicum. mycobank.org).

100 I MA FUNGUS Asexual-sexual morphs in Berkleasmium

Berkleasmium concinnum ILLS 80802A ARTICL Berkleasmium concinnum ILLS 80803A Berkleasmium concinnum DAOM 696499A Berkleasmium concinnum NB-789A * 100 A Berkleasmium concinnum ILLS 80804 E A 99 Berkleasmium concinnum ILLS 80805 Berkleasmium concinnum ILLS 59356S 93 Neoacanthostigma thailandicum MFLUCC 15-1248 Neoacanthostigma fusiforme MFLUCC 11-0510 * 100 Helicosporium linderi NBRC 9207 100 khunkornensis MFLUCC 10-0119 Helicoma conicodentatum UBC F14998 Chlamydotubeufia cf. huaikangplaensis MFLUCC 11-0512 filiforme ILLS 59353 92 Helicomyces lilliputeus NBRC 32664 100 Tubeufia javanica MFLUCC 12-0545 * Tubeufia roseohelicospora MFLUCC 15-1247 99 Helicosporium talbotii MUCL 33010 90 Helicomyces roseus CBS 283.51 * Tubeufia amazonensis ATCC 42524 65 Helicosporium pallidum CBS 962.69 69 100 Tubeufia aurantiella ANM 718 Helicosporium panachaeum CBS 257.59 Tamhinispora indica AMH 9555 * 98 Helicosporium aureum NBRC 7098 Acanthostigma scopulum ANM 386 85 Helicosporium guianense UAMH 1699 100 Chlamydotubeufia helicospora MFLUCC 16-0213 100 Chlamydotubeufia khunkornensis MFLUCC 10-0118 Helicoön gigantisporum BCC 3550 Acanthostigma multiseptatum ILLS 59354 100 Acanthostigma perpusillum UAMH 7237 * 97 Acanthostigma chiangmaiensis MFLUCC 10-0125 Helicosporium guianense CBS 269.52 Helicosporium gracile CBS 284.54 Thaxteriellopsis lignicola MFLUCC 10-0122 * Botryosphaeria corticis CBS 119047

0.07

Fig. 1. Most likely tree from a AzE@“<V'“V\%# species. Culture collection accession E'E A denotes sequences derived from Berkleasmium concinnum asexual morph and S denotes sequences derived from B. concinnum sexual morphs. RAxML 1 !*!!!; %1!$ Botryosphaeria corticis and the scale bar represents the number of substitutions per site.

TAXONOMY Synonyms: Berkleasmium cordeanum Zobel, in Corda, Icon. Fung. 6: 4 (1854); nom. illegit. (Art. 52.1). Berkleasmium concinnum (Berk.) S. Hughes, Canad. Neoacanthostigma septoconstrictum] z+@V J. Bot. 36: 740 (1958). Boonmee & K.D. Hyde, Fungal Diversity 68: 279 (2014). H{] @!*!|* M Acanthostigma septoconstrictum ] z+ @ Basionym: Sporidesmium concinnum Berk., London J. Bot. Mycologia 102: 579 (2010). 4|#!$*"‡

V O LUME 8 · NO . 1 101 TanneyTanne & Miller

Type: USA: Ohio: on dead wood, T.G. Lea 1688 ‰@ ' #„*$"_ I.M. Bacuebeba (DAOM %{‰@'<@<$‡#_'E' *!*!# – USA: Louisiana| V ] Ž < LE Swamp near Pearl River, rotten wood, 6 Jun. 1976, S.J. Hughes C Other specimens examined: Canada: Quebec: Gatineau, Aylmer, Xz„@* ""#{ ibid., 6 Jun. 1976, W.B. Cooke (DAOM 155884).

RTI Boucher Forest, on large, rotten, decorticated hardwood log, 17 Massachusetts: Salem, on Salixx *"#‡ Xz„@ ‡#`"`

A Jul. 2015, J.B. Tanney Xz„@ `$`‡_#{ ibid., 29 Aug. 2015, J.B. Missouri|V“/;* +%*$‡* Tanney (DAOM 696486); ibid., 100 Jul. 2015, J.B. Tanney (DAOM G.D. Darkerr (DAOM 75764). New York: Flatbush, 1890, I.L. Zabriskie `$`‡$$Xz„@/ * *Xz„@/ * *#{ ibid., fallen hardwood Xz„@#‡#!_{“'/]%A log, 5 Sep. 2016, J.B. Tanney +;'_"$ – Russia: Primorsky Krai, 6 Sep. 1952, S.J. HughessXz„@$! Xz„@$#__{ ibid., on ‰ X ‰% ] + ]% decorticated wood (old), 6 Sep. 1952, W.I. IllmanXz„@#$* ‡{

Table 1. Sequences used in phylogenetic analyses in this study. Species Specimen/strain GenBank No. ITS LSU Acanthostigma chiangmaiense @H“\//*!'!* T Z+"` !$ Z+"` *$_ /" <““V $# #T GQ856146 GQ850494 Acanthostigma multiseptatum <““V $# ‡T +A¯**$_ $ GQ850492 Acanthostigma perpusillum \z@Ž_#_ AY916492 AY856892 Acanthostigma scopulum z+@#"` GQ856141 GQ850489 Berkleasmium concinnum <““V $# `(T) +A¯**$_ " +=¯!‡ ! Berkleasmium concinnum DAOM 696499 KY611397 KY611399 Berkleasmium concinnum NB-789 KY611398 KY611400 Berkleasmium concinnum ILLS 80802 KY582484 Berkleasmium concinnum ILLS 80803 KY582485 Berkleasmium concinnum ILLS 80804 KY582486 Berkleasmium concinnum ILLS 80805 KY582487 Botryosphaeria corticis CBS 119047T +A¯****# +=¯!‡‡ _ !cf. huaikangplaensis @H“\//**'! * ‰H#!* " ‰H#!* #` ! @H“\//*`'!*#T KX454169 KX454170 ! MFLUCC 100118T +A¯*#_ "" Z+"` *$! Helicoma conicodentatum UBC F14998 AY916450 AY856869 Helicomyces lilliputeus +;A/#``‡ z$*`‡"# AY856899 Helicomyces roseus /;V"# * AY916464 AY856881 Helicoön gigantisporum ;//# ! AY916467 AY856904 Helicosporium aureum +;A/_!$" AY916478 AY856894 Helicosporium gracile CBS 284.54 AY916485 AY916086 Helicosporium guianense UAMH 1699 AY916479 AY856891 Helicosporium guianense CBS 269.52 AY916487 z" `"$# Helicosporium linderi +;A/$!_ AY916454 AY856895 Helicosporium pallidum CBS 962.69 AY916460 AY856886 Helicosporium panachaeum CBS 257.59 AY916471 AY916087 Helicosporium talbotii @\/“##!*! AY916465 AY856874 Neoacanthostigma fusiforme @H“\//**'! *!T ‰H#!* $ ‰H#!* #_ Neoacanthostigma thailandicum @H“\//* '*‡"T KX454176 2 Tamhinispora indica AMH 9555T +A¯*#_"!* ‰/‡`$"# Thaxteriellopsis lignicola @H“\//*!'!* Z+"` !` Z+"` *$‡ #= z//‡ ‡T AY916458 AY856911 # z+@_*" GQ856140 GQ850485 #~ @H“\//*'! ‡ T ‰Z""!!#‡ ‰Z""!!#` # @H“\//*!'!**$T Z+"` !# Z+"` *$* # @H“\//* '*‡_ KX454177 KX454178 + ƒ bold, T ƒ E' (T) refers to the holotype of Neoacanthostigma septoconstrictum, not B. concinnum.

102 I MA FUNGUS Asexual-sexual morphs in Berkleasmium ARTICL E

Fig. 2. Berkleasmium concinnum conidiomata and ascomata. A–C /' and asterisks (*) denote sporodochia. D–E. Sporodochia in situ. F. Sporodochium. G–I. Conidiogenous cells. J. Conidia mounted in H2O. K. Developing and mature conidia mounted in lactic acid. A–C Xz„@`$`‡_# X'Ž +;'_"$ I–J Xz„@* ""‡‰Xz„@* ""#;|zMU— !! μm, F = 100 μm, G–K = 10 μm.

Buffalo, G.W. ClintonXz„@#‡#`North Carolina: Haywood Co., Neoacanthostigma thailandicum z+@ = V @ + ] ; / ;E / sp. nov. # _‡" o+'"#***$o J`*!%# MycoBank MB819966 branch on ground, 16 Jun. 2007, A.N. Miller et al.z+@**‡*<““V 80802); Cullowhee, on rotten wood, Jun. 1887, R. Thaxter (DAOM Etymology|+ 29026). South Carolina| Xz„@ #‡#`* Tennessee: was collected. ; / ; @ = V @ + ]#z*$__ S.J. Hughess (DAOM Diagnosis: Neoacanthostigma thailandicum is distinguished *""$"_ Xz„@ *`$#!{ / / = V @ from all other species in the genus by macronematous +]/“=# _ #$o+"#!_*o W, 716 ' m elev., decorticated wood on ground, 15 Jul. 2005, A.N. Miller & conidia (to 920 μm long). A.M. Stchigellz+@ #`*<““V $# `MAcanthostigma septoconstrictum); ibid., decorticated 5 cm diam. branch on ground, Description: For a complete description of this taxon see #+%!!_A.N. Miller et al.z+@*‡!_<““V"!"! { ibid., Cosby Hyde et al. (2016: 125; N. septoconstrictum@H“\*`'**#‡ +# _ #"o+"#!_o W, 716 m elev., 50 cm diam log on ground, 20 May 2008, A.N. Miller et al.z+@*_!*<““V"!"!`{ Type: Thailand: Prachuap Khiri Khan, Bang Sapan, Ron V% / = V @ + ] \#!Z = = „ V # _!_`o+ "##"!‡o 2015, K.D. Hyde KH02@H“\*`'**#‡M%{;;Ž W, 457 m elev., decorticated 6 cm diam branch on ground, 19 Jun. ‡*! * M %{@H“\// * '*‡";A/ M 2007, A.N. Miller et al.z+@**_*<““V"!"!#{/ E' /+z;<# `""*o+"#‡$$$o W, 549 m elev., decorticated 5 cm diam branch on ground, 18 Jun. 2007, A.N. Illustration: Hyde et al.!*`|_` Miller et al.z+@*_<““V"!"!‡ West Virginia: Giles County, @“V*$#`, Notes: Neoacanthostigma thailandicum @H“\*`'**#‡ D.H. LinderXz„@‡$*`{++%*"$# N. septoconstrictum in Hyde et al. (2016). L.W. NuttallXz„@#‡$!Wisconsin: Devil’s Lake near Madison, ‡V*$ # R.F. Cain (DAOM 41029).

V O LUME 8 · NO . 1 103 TanneyTanne & Miller

DISCUSSION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS LE ;<V“V\ƒ We are grateful to Scott A. Redhead for nomenclatural advice and to C morph Berkleasmium concinnum and the pyrenomycete „‰AXz„@*!*!#

RTI morph Neoacanthostigma septoconstrictum are the + V

A same species and therefore must be given a single H XU;'! * " z+@ + V N. septoconstrictum is synonymized under UA//]=VX' B. concinnum because of the priority of Berkleasmium ‡ $#*'!*‡Z;Z;@@ over Neoacanthostigma.A'E N. “@@“„AX/'zzH/„ septoconstrictum type specimen and additional B. X+zƒ‰zV concinnum ƒ' on this manuscript. occurrence of both the asexual and sexual morphs on the same substrate, providing additional circumstantial support for this connection (Fig. 2 A–C). REFERENCES Neoacanthostigma was proposed to accommodate a new species, N. fusiforme, which was chosen as the type species, Berkeley MJ (1845) Decades of fungi. Dec. VIII.–X. London Journal along with '+" and N. septoconstrictum, two species of Botany 4|$"M#* previously included in Acanthostigma but demonstrated ; V [ / ] / U /‰ to be phylogenetically distinct from the type species, A. et al. (2011) Revision of lignicolous # based on perpusillum (Boonmee et al.!*‡;<V'“V\ morphological reexamination and phylogenetic analysis. Fungal phylogeny presented here, the transfer of Acanthostigma Diversity 51|`#M*! "to Neoacanthostigma appears unwarranted given its ; V Az “ Z'‰ “ J'Z X X'° et al. (2014) phylogenetic distance from N. fusiforme (Fig. 1). However, #, ord. nov., integrating sexual and asexual generic these two species were weakly clustered together based names. Fungal Diversity 68|#$M$" on the LSU phylogeny from Promputtha & Miller (2010) and ;Z*$` z ƒ % <V“V\; et al. dissecting needles by sharpening tungsten wire electrolytically. !*‡'+" was not resolved in this Bulletin of the World Health Organization 32|*‡# study because of low support. Hyde et al. (2016) reported Bussaban B, Lumyong S, Lumyong P, McKenzie EHC, Hyde KD ' E N. septoconstrictum (2001) A synopsis of the genus Berkleasmium with two new \ species and new records of Canalisporium caribense from { % <Vƒ Zingiberaceae Fungal Diversity 8|_#'" (KX454176) of this specimen (MFLUCC 15–1248) clearly Corda ACJ (1854) Icones Fungorum hucusque cognitorum. Vol. 6. distinguishes it from the N. septoconstrictum type specimen Prague: J.G. Calve. Ɨ‡`  #_"_ †—‡ #__ †Ç<V X@XzZJX+;V“Z‰ dissimilarity and distinctive asexual morph morphology from et al. (2016) Microfungi on Tectona grandis + B. concinnum resulted in our description of this specimen as Fungal Diversity 82: 1–76. a novel species, N. thailandicum. Ellis MB (1971) Dematiaceous Hyphomycetes. Kew: Commonwealth # (#) asexual morphs are Mycological Institute. morphologically diverse, containing helicosporous Hyde KD, Hongsanan S, Jeewon R, Bhat DJ, McKenzie EHC, et al. genera such as Helicoma, Helicomyces, Helicoön, and !*`H%#`_M‡$!|E Helicosporium, and staurosporous genera including contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 80: 1–270. Araneomyces and Tetracrium (Réblová & Barr 2000, ‰‰VX@!*#@zHHƒ Kodsueb et al. !!‡ ; !!` A software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. dictyosporous conidial morphs in # more Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 772–780. reminiscent of B. concinnum include ! Kodsueb R, Lumyong S, Lumyong P, McKenzie EH, Ho WH, et spp., Manoharachariella tectonae, # =, al. (2004) Acanthostigma and # species, including T. and T. khunkornensis (Rossman & Müller 1979, Boonmee claspisphaeria sp. nov., from submerged wood in Hong Kong. et al. !** !*‡ A‚ V !*# X Mycologia 96: 667–674. et al !*` “=*"‡$ Catalogue of Plants, native and naturalized, collected B. concinnum and the helicosporous N. fusiforme and N. in the vicinity of Cincinnati, Ohio, during the years 1834–1844. thailandicum is unexpected but supported by molecular Philadelphia: Collins. evidence generated from independently collected and @ A *$ " X <| Sporidesmium complex. ƒ Mycologia 50: 681–692. E B. @A*$ $Berkleasmium. Mycologia 51|_#‡M_#$ concinnum presented in this study demonstrates the +Z!!‡ MrModeltest 2.2. Program distributed by the author, ƒ '' Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Sweden. unsequenced dematiaceous hyphomycetes. Pinnoi A, Jeewon R, Sakayaroj J, Hyde KD, Jones EG (2007) Berkleasmium crunisia % to the *"V "V X+z ƒ analyses. Mycologia 99|#_"M#"‡

104 I MA FUNGUS Asexual-sexual morphs in Berkleasmium

]<@z+!*!Acanthostigma Stamatakis A (2014) RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic ARTICL (#, ) from Great Smoky Mountains 'Bioinformatics +] Mycologia 102: 574–587. 30|*#*M*#*# Raghuveer Rao P, Rao D (1964) “Berkleasmium” Zobel from india. VX“!!#PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony Mycopathologia 22|#**M#*‡ (*and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland, MA: Sinaeuer E A‚ ‰ V A !*# Tamhinispora a new genus Associates. belongs to family # from the Western Ghats, India Z; + ŽX ]Œ H V ‰z !* z based on morphology and phylogenetic analysis. Mycosphere later: rediscovery, culturing and phylogenetic analysis of 4: 165–174. Diploöspora rosea, a rare onygenalean hyphomycete. Antonie Az!*‡H%*‡\%UV van Leeuwenhoek 108|*!#M*!# A%@;@U!!!Acanthostigma (#, /;@!!`]% Pleosporales). Sydowia 52: 258–285. X+zƒ AƒH@%@]zX“Xz et al. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 39: 587–597. !* @; #| ; J Ž'‰ z z / ]J Ž ‰X Z A !!_ and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Pleosporales: an example from Biology 61| #$M ‡ MassariosphaeriaX+zA;] Rossman A, Müller E (1979) Life history studies of Brazilian Mycological Research 111: 1268–1276. ` # with, respectively, Whitton SR, McKenzie EH, Hyde KD (2012) List of fungi associated 'Sydowia with Pandanaceae. In: Fungi Associated with Pandanaceae 31: 180–192. VA J UŽ @‰Œ ‰X Ž ‰X | # M‡" VŒ A@ @z+ ; @ª !*z Dordrecht: Springer. Acanthostigma (#, Dothideomycetes) from the Southern Hemisphere. Mycologia 104|#M#* V ‰z @'Z = = J ‰ ; !** The Genera of Hyphomycetes. [Biodiversity Series no. 9] Utrecht. /;V'‰+zJH;%/

V O LUME 8 · NO . 1 105