DOCSLIB.ORG

The Sound of Indo-European Phonetics, Phonemics, and Morphophonemics 16–19 April 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Sound of Indo-European Phonetics, Phonemics, and Morphophonemics 16–19 April 2009 ROOTS OF EUROPE – LANGUAGE, CULTURE, AND MIGRATIONS UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN The sound of Indo-European Phonetics, phonemics, and morphophonemics 16–19 April 2009 Abstracts photo: Mirjam Marti ROOTS OF EUROPE – LANGUAGE, CULTURE, AND MIGRATIONS UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN The sound of Indo-European Phonetics, phonemics, and morphophonemics 16–19 April 2009 Abstracts rootsofeurope.ku.dk Contents CONFERENCE PROGRAMME V Václav Blažek On Indo-European correspondences to Afro-Asiatic laryngeals 1 Lars Brink The etymology of Danishkone ‘wife etc.’ 6 ANDREW BYRD Predicting PIE syllabification through phonotactic analysis 7 Paul S. Cohen & Adam Hyllested A new sound law of PIE: initial **h3w > *h2w 9 Michael Frotscher On final‑r in Vedic 10 josé virgilio garcía trabazo Phonologische und morphologische Bemerkungen zu den hethitischen -i̯e/a-Verben 12 Piotr Gąsiorowski The Compass Conspiracy, a footnote to Verner’s Law and some further observations on the reflexes of PIE ‑* sr‑ 14 Aaron Griffith Raising before *µ in Old Irish: evidence and consequences 15 Irén Hegedűs Theruki -rule in Nuristani 17 Eugen Hill 19 Hidden sound laws in the inflectional morphology of Proto-Indo- European Adam Hyllested 21 The status and prevalence of Proto-Indo-European *a ANders Richardt Jørgensen The development of Proto-Celtic *sk in Brythonic 23 II Contents Joshua T. Katz Greek ὀπυίω and other words without a digamma 24 Götz Keydana Evidence for non-linear phonological structure in Indo-European: the case of fricative clusters 25 Alwin Kloekhorst The phonological interpretation of plene and non-plene spellede in Hittite 27 Agnes Korn Parthian ž 28 Guus Kroonen The rise of the Germanic iterative verbs: another case of ablaut being translated into consonant gradation 29 Martin J. Kümmel Typology and reconstruction: the IE consonants and vowel 30 Rosemarie Lühr & Susanne Zeilfelder Optimale Onsets im Indogermanischen 31 Marek Majer The development of Proto-Slavic word-final-ī * , *-ě from PIE *-oi̯, ‘*-ai̯’ 32 Biliana Mihaylova Some cases of the converse of Sievers’ law in Greek 33 Paolo Milizia On the morphophonemics of Proto-Indo-European *-sḱe/o- suffixed presents 35 Kanehiro Nishimura Vowel reduction and deletion in Sabellic: history and chronology 37 Georges-Jean Pinault Remarks on the PIE amphikinetic nouns 39 Charles Prescott Germanic and the ruki dialects 41 Contents III Tijmen Pronk The “Saussure Effect” in Indo-European languages, other than Greek 43 JENS ELMEGÅRD RASMUSSEN Rule ordering paradoxes in Indo-European: reintroducing phonetics 44 Giancarlo Schirru Laryngeal features in stops of Armenian dialects 45 Ilja Seržant Tocharisches Lautgesetz *‑sl‑ > ‑ll‑ / ‑l‑ 47 Vitalij Shevoroshkin Indo-European laryngeals in Anatolian 48 Zsolt SImon PIE ‘me’ and a new Lydian sound law 50 Thomas Smitherman Some consequences of Kartvelian realisations of Indo-European borrowings for the reconstruction of the Proto-Indo-European phonological system 51 Dieter Steinbauer Proto-Indo-European *kakós ‘bad’ –another good example of unconditioned /a/ 54 David Stifter The sociophonemics of Late Gaulish 56 Lucien van Beek Greek evidence for the “Saussure Effect” reconsidered 57 Brent Vine PIE mobile accent in Italic: further evidence 58 Gordon Whittaker Aspects of Euphratic phonology 60 Paul Widmer Types of ablaut class assignment in non-primary nominal derivation 61 IV Contents ILYA YAKUBOVICH Phonetic interpretation of Hurrian sibilants in the light of Indo-European evidence 62 Nicholas Zair A new environment for laryngeal loss in Proto-Celtic 64 V Programme All lectures will take place in: Room 23.0.50 The Faculty of Humanities, Københavns Universitet Amager (KUA) Njalsgade 120 2300 Copenhagen S Wednesday 15 April 2009 16:00–18:00 Registration and informal drinks Room 22.5.26 Department of Nordic Studies and Linguistics (KUA) 18:30 Informal dinner at participants’ own expense (details to be announced) Bryggens Spisehus Islands Brygge 18 2300 København S Phone: (+45) 32540082 www.bryggens.dk VI Thursday 16 April 2009 8:00–10:30 Registration (in front of room 23.0.50) 10:30–10:45 Welcome and practical information (room 23.0.50) 10:45–12:15 1st section. Chair: Paul Widmer 10:45–11:15 Rosemarie Lühr & Susanne Zeilfelder Optimale Onsets im Indogermanischen 11:15–11:45 Andrew Byrd Predicting PIE syllabification through phonotactic analysis 11:45–12:15 Götz Keydana Evidence for non-linear phonological structure in Indo-European: the case of fricative clusters 12:15–13:45 Lunch break 13:45–15:15 2nd section. Chair: Jens Elmegård Rasmussen 13:45–14:45 Eugen Hill Hidden sound laws in the inflectional morphology of Proto-Indo- European 14:45–15:15 Georges-Jean Pinault Remarks on the PIE amphikinetic nouns 15:15–15:30 Coffee break 15:30–17:00 3rd section. Chair: Jenny Helena Larsson 15:30–16:00 Jens Elmegård Rasmussen Rule ordering paradoxes in Indo-European morphophonemics: reintroducing phonetics 16:00–16:30 Joshua Katz Greek ὀπυίω and other words without a digamma 16:30–17:00 Biliana Mihaylova Some cases of the converse of Sievers’ law in Greek 17:00–17:15 Coffee break 17:15–18:15 4th section. Chair: Agnes Korn 17:15–17:45 Tijmen Pronk The “Saussure Effect” in Indo-European languages, other than Greek 17:45–18:15 Lucien van Beek Greek evidence for the “Saussure Effect” reconsidered Friday 17 April 2009 VII 8:00–9:30 Registration (in front of room 23.0.50) 9:30–10:30 5th section. Chair: Thomas Olander 9:30–10:00 Marek Majer The development of Proto-Slavic word-final *-ī, *-ĕ from PIE *-oi, ‘*-ai̯’ 10:00–10:30 Ina Vishogradska Vowel harmony in the Slavonic loanwords hosted in Hungarian (Phonol. characteristics of Slavonic loanwords in non-IE languages) 10:30–10:45 Coffee break 10:45–12.15 6th section. Chair: Rosemarie Lühr 10:45–11:15 Piotr Gąsiorowski The Compass Conspiracy, a footnote to Verner’s Law and some further observations on the reflexes of PIE *-sr- 11:15–11:45 Paolo Milizia On the morphophonemics of Proto-Indo-European *-sk̂e/o- suffixed presents 11:45–12:15 Ilja Seržant Ein tocharisches Lautgesetz *-sl- > -ll-/-l- 12.15–13:45 Lunch break 13:45–15:15 7th section. Chair: Birgit Anette Olsen 13:45–14:45 Martin J. Kümmel Typology and reconstruction: the IE consonants and vowels 14:45–15:15 Paul Widmer Types of ablaut class assignment in non-primary nominal deriva‑ tion 15:15–15:30 Coffee break 15:30–16:30 8th section. Chair: Piotr Gąsiorowski 15:30–16:00 Adam Hyllested The status and prevalence of Proto-Indo-European *a 16:00–16:30 Dieter Steinbauer Proto-Indo-European *kakós ‘bad’ – another good example of unconditioned /a/ 17:30 Sightseeing: Copenhagen from the seaside (for registered participants) VIII Saturday 18 April 2009 8:00–9.00 Registration (in front of room 23.0.50) 9:00–10:30 9th section. Chair: Georges-Jean Pinault 9:00–9:30 Michael Frotscher On final -r in Vedic 9:30–10:00 Irén Hegedűs The ruki-rule in Nuristani 10:00–10:30 Agnes Korn Parthian ž 10:30–10:45 Coffee break 10:45–12:15 10th section. Chair: Irén Hegedűs 10:45–11:15 Václav Blažek On Indo-European correspondences to Afro-Asiatic laryngeals 11:15–11:45 Thomas Smitherman Some consequences of Kartvelian realisations of IE borrowings for the reconstruction of the PIE phonological system 11:45–12:15 Gordon Whittaker Aspects of Euphratic phonology 12:15–13:45 Lunch break 13:45–15:15 11th section. Chair: Benedicte Nielsen 13:45–14:45 Brent Vine PIE mobile accent in Italic: further evidence 14:45–15:15 Kanehiro Nishimura Vowel reduction and deletion in Sabellic: history and chronology 15:15–15:30 Coffee break 15:30–17:00 12th section. Chair: Joshua Katz 15:30–16:00 Paul S. Cohen & Adam Hyllested A new sound law of PIE: initial **h₃w > *h₂w 16:00–16:30 Vitalij Shevoroshkin Indo-European laryngeals in Anatolian 16:30–17:00 Giancarlo Schirru Laryngeal features in stops of Armenian dialects 19:00 Conference dinner (details to be announced) Madklubben Store Kongensgade 66, 1264 København K Phone: (+45) 33 32 32 34; www.madklubben.info Sunday 19 April 2009 IX 10:00–10:45 Registration (in front of room 23.0.50) 10:45–12:15 13th section. Chair: David Stifter 10:45–11:15 Aaron Griffith Raising before *µ in Old Irish: evidence and consequences 11:15–11:45 Anders Richardt Jørgensen The development of Proto-Celtic *sk in Brythonic 11:45–12:15 Nicholas Zair A new environment for laryngeal loss in Proto-Celtic 12.15–13:45 Lunch break 13:45–15:15 14th section. Chair: Hans Götzsche 13:45–14:15 David Stifter The sociophonemics of Late Gaulish 14:15–14:45 Charles Prescott Germanic and the ruki dialects 14:45–15:15 Guus Kroonen The rise of the Germanic iterative verbs: another case of ablaut being translated into consonant gradation 15:15–15:30 Coffee break 15:30–16:30 15th section. Chair: Susanne Zeilfelder 15:30–16:00 Lars Brink The etymology of Danish kone ‘wife etc.’ 16:00–16:30 Alwin Kloekhorst The phonological interpretation of plene and non-plene spelled e in Hittite 16:30–17:00 Zsolt Simon PIE ‘me’ and a new Lydian sound law 17:00–17:15 Coffee break 17:15–18:15 16th section. Chair: Gordon Whittaker 17:15–17:45 José Virgilio García Trabazo Phonologische und morphologische Bemerkungen zu den hethitischen -i̯e/a-Verben 17:45–18:15 Ilya Yakubovich Phonetic interpretation of Hurrian sibilants in the light of IE evidence 18:15 End of the conference 1 On Indo-European correspondences to Afro-Asiatic laryngeals vÁCLAV bLAžеK Masaryk University, Brno The present list of lexical comparisons between Afroasiatic and Indo-Europe- an was chosen according to two criteria: (i) The phonetic correspondences are in agreement with the phonetic rules established by V.M.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Impact of Hittite and Tocharian: Rethinking Indo-European in the 20Th Century and Beyond
    The Impact of Hittite and Tocharian: Rethinking Indo-European in the 20th Century and Beyond The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Jasanoff, Jay. 2017. The Impact of Hittite and Tocharian: Rethinking Indo-European in the 20th Century and Beyond. In Handbook of Comparative and Historical Indo-European Linguistics, edited by Jared Klein, Brian Joseph, and Matthias Fritz, 31-53. Munich: Walter de Gruyter. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:41291502 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA 18. The Impact of Hittite and Tocharian ■■■ 35 18. The Impact of Hittite and Tocharian: Rethinking Indo-European in the Twentieth Century and Beyond 1. Two epoch-making discoveries 4. Syntactic impact 2. Phonological impact 5. Implications for subgrouping 3. Morphological impact 6. References 1. Two epoch-making discoveries The ink was scarcely dry on the last volume of Brugmann’s Grundriß (1916, 2nd ed., Vol. 2, pt. 3), so to speak, when an unexpected discovery in a peripheral area of Assyriol- ogy portended the end of the scholarly consensus that Brugmann had done so much to create. Hrozný, whose Sprache der Hethiter appeared in 1917, was not primarily an Indo-Europeanist, but, like any trained philologist of the time, he could see that the cuneiform language he had deciphered, with such features as an animate nom.
    [Show full text]
  • A Typology of Consonant Agreement As Correspondence
    A TYPOLOGY OF CONSONANT AGREEMENT AS CORRESPONDENCE SHARON ROSE RACHEL WALKER University of California, San Diego University of Southern California This article presents a typology of consonant harmony or LONG DISTANCE CONSONANT AGREEMENT that is analyzed as arisingthroughcorrespondence relations between consonants rather than feature spreading. The model covers a range of agreement patterns (nasal, laryngeal, liquid, coronal, dorsal) and offers several advantages. Similarity of agreeing consonants is central to the typology and is incorporated directly into the constraints drivingcorrespondence. Agreementby correspon- dence without feature spreadingcaptures the neutrality of interveningsegments,which neither block nor undergo. Case studies of laryngeal agreement and nasal agreement are presented, demon- stratingthe model’s capacity to capture varyingdegreesof similarity crosslinguistically.* 1. INTRODUCTION. The action at a distance that is characteristic of CONSONANT HAR- MONIES stands as a pivotal problem to be addressed by phonological theory. Consider the nasal alternations in the Bantu language, Kikongo (Meinhof 1932, Dereau 1955, Webb 1965, Ao 1991, Odden 1994, Piggott 1996). In this language, the voiced stop in the suffix [-idi] in la is realized as [ini] in 1b when preceded by a nasal consonant at any distance in the stem constituent, consistingof root and suffixes. (1) a. m-[bud-idi]stem ‘I hit’ b. tu-[kun-ini]stem ‘we planted’ n-[suk-idi]stem ‘I washed’ tu-[nik-ini]stem ‘we ground’ In addition to the alternation in 1, there are no Kikongo roots containing a nasal followed by a voiced stop, confirmingthat nasal harmony or AGREEMENT, as we term it, also holds at the root level as a MORPHEME STRUCTURE CONSTRAINT (MSC).
    [Show full text]
  • Indo-European Linguistics: an Introduction Indo-European Linguistics an Introduction
    This page intentionally left blank Indo-European Linguistics The Indo-European language family comprises several hun- dred languages and dialects, including most of those spoken in Europe, and south, south-west and central Asia. Spoken by an estimated 3 billion people, it has the largest number of native speakers in the world today. This textbook provides an accessible introduction to the study of the Indo-European proto-language. It clearly sets out the methods for relating the languages to one another, presents an engaging discussion of the current debates and controversies concerning their clas- sification, and offers sample problems and suggestions for how to solve them. Complete with a comprehensive glossary, almost 100 tables in which language data and examples are clearly laid out, suggestions for further reading, discussion points and a range of exercises, this text will be an essential toolkit for all those studying historical linguistics, language typology and the Indo-European proto-language for the first time. james clackson is Senior Lecturer in the Faculty of Classics, University of Cambridge, and is Fellow and Direc- tor of Studies, Jesus College, University of Cambridge. His previous books include The Linguistic Relationship between Armenian and Greek (1994) and Indo-European Word For- mation (co-edited with Birgit Anette Olson, 2004). CAMBRIDGE TEXTBOOKS IN LINGUISTICS General editors: p. austin, j. bresnan, b. comrie, s. crain, w. dressler, c. ewen, r. lass, d. lightfoot, k. rice, i. roberts, s. romaine, n. v. smith Indo-European Linguistics An Introduction In this series: j. allwood, l.-g. anderson and o.¨ dahl Logic in Linguistics d.
    [Show full text]
  • Ü*Ry, As I See It
    Y x6 SEMINAR ON INDO-EUROPEAN LINGUISTICS 9. My basic critique and statertent is "An amendment to Fortuna- tov's Law," Sunítí Kumar Chatterji Commemoration Volume (ed. THE IMPORTANCE OF SANSKRIT FOR THE Bhakti Prasad Mallik), University of Burdwan, West Bengal, LARYNGEAL TIIEORY 1981, 106-12. I then revised my formulation to broaden the scope the law : "A revised amenclment to Fortunatov's Law," of R. S. P. BEEKES Indo.Iranían ïournal 25, 1983, 275-6. KZ 98, 1985, 59' adds another example. l. It would seem appropriate me this occasion 10. IEW 8O3 lists only OCS platsno for this cognate set, which must for on reflect an original nomen instrument of the type KOITOS, the to speak on Sanskrit and the laryngeal theory. We corflüe- original force being 'an instrument of covering'. mofate the discovery that Sanskrit is cognate with the languages 11. Chatterjí Commemoration Volume 108, following Burrow. of Europe. Therefore it is natural to concentrate on Sanskrit- 12. Note that according to F¡isk, GEW 1.397-A, the Ionic 4 is an The acceptance of the laryngeal theory, on the other hand, is innovation, and therefore will not support a set reconstruction. one of the most impoftant new developments in Indo-European 13. Chatterii Commemoralton Volume 708. linguistics, though it is not really a new discovery ; in fact it 14. See IEW 807; E. P. Hamp, Iournal ol Línguístics 3, 1967,89. is more than a hundred years old. But it is only in the last 15. See my analysis of this cogûate set, KZ 96, 1982/83, 1.75.
    [Show full text]
  • Europaio: a Brief Grammar of the European Language Reconstruct Than the Individual Groupings
    1. Introduction 1.1. The Indo-European 1. The Indo-European languages are a family of several hundred languages and dialects, including most of the major languages of Europe, as well as many in South Asia. Contemporary languages in this family include English, German, French, Spanish, Countries with IE languages majority in orange. In Portuguese, Hindustani (i.e., mainly yellow, countries in which have official status. [© gfdl] Hindi and Urdu) and Russian. It is the largest family of languages in the world today, being spoken by approximately half the world's population as their mother tongue, while most of the other half speak at least one of them. 2. The classification of modern IE dialects into languages and dialects is controversial, as it depends on many factors, such as the pure linguistic ones (most of the times being the least important of them), the social, economic, political and historical ones. However, there are certain common ancestors, some of them old, well-attested languages (or language systems), as Classic Latin for Romance languages (such as French, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Rumanian or Catalan), Classic Sanskrit for the Indo-Aryan languages or Classic Greek for present-day Greek. Furthermore, there are other, still older -some of them well known- dialects from which these old language systems were derived and later systematized, which are, following the above examples, Archaic Latin, Archaic Sanskrit and Archaic Greek, also attested in older compositions and inscriptions. And there are, finally, old related dialects which help develop a Proto-Language, as the Faliscan (and Osco-Umbrian for many scholars) for Latino-Faliscan (Italic for many), the Avestan for Indo-Iranian or the Mycenaean for Proto-Greek.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimizing the Laryngeal Theory: Testing the Models of Puhvel, Eichner and Melchert/Rix Against Szemerényi’S Monolaryngealism
    1 Indo-European Linguistics in the 21st Century (3) Optimizing the Laryngeal Theory: Testing the Models of Puhvel, Eichner and Melchert/Rix against Szemerényi’s Monolaryngealism Jouna PYYSALO & Juha JANHUNEN University of Helsinki ABSTRACT: Since both the orthodox (MØLLER, BENVENISTE, PUHVEL) and the revisionist (KURYŁOWICZ, EICHNER, MELCHERT/RIX, KORTLANDT) models of the laryngeal theory (LT) have failed to solve the problem of the IE vowels (PYYSALO & JANHUNEN 2018a, 2018b), revisions in the theory are necessary. A comparison of the models of PUHVEL, EICHNER, and MELCHERT-RIX with regard to the criterion of economy shows that, although they are mutually contradictory, each of them has contributed at least one correct solution absent in the other models. By combining these correct solutions into a single model we can arrive at what may be termed the “Optimized Laryngeal Theory” (OLT), which, then, can be tested against monolaryngealism, as formulated by SZEMERÉNYI. 1 The reconstruction models to be analyzed 1.1 Hermann MØLLER’s (1879, 1880, 1906, 1911) laryngeal theory originally assumed three laryngeals *h1 *h2 *h3, a single vowel *e, and the Semitic root morphology CC·C for Proto-Indo-European (PIE). After Bedřich HROZNÝ’s (1917) proof of the Indo-European character of Hittite MØLLER’s Indo-Semitic hypothesis, subsequently known as the laryngeal theory (LT), was tested against the data. As a result of this the LT split in two in 1935, as the orthodox theory, defined by MØLLER’s monovocalism hypothesis (PIE *e as the only root vowel), found a competitor in the revisionist theory, which postulated the vowel PIE *o in addition to PIE *e.1 By the early 1950s yet another competitor — one with an inductive approach, starting directly from the data, rather than accepting MØLLER’s theory — emerged when Ladislav ZGUSTA (1951) introduced monolaryngealism, which was subsequently developed by Oswald SZEMERÉNYI (1967, 1970).
    [Show full text]
  • On Historical Phonology, Typology, and Reconstruction Lectures at Charles University, Prague, 19-20 November 2012
    1 On historical phonology, typology, and reconstruction Lectures at Charles University, Prague, 19-20 November 2012 1. Stops, the glottis, and laryngeals: the reconstruction of Proto-Indo-European 1. Introduction Traditional reconstruction of PIE consonant system labial dental “palatal” “velar” “labiovelar” ”laryngeal” stops: voiceless = tenues *p *t *k *k *kʷ voiced = mediae (*b ) *d *g̑ *g *gʷ voiced aspirated = asperae *b ʱ *dʱ *g̑ʱ *gʱ *gʷʱ fricatives *s *h ₁, *h ₂, *h ₃ glides *i̯ = j *u̯ = w liquids *l, *r nasals *m *n *h₁, *h₂, *h₃ = h, χ, ʁ (see later) 2. The IE stop system A. Reconstruction models of PIE stops The main reflexes of stop series in IE branches, exemplified by dentals Continuation in IE branches T Anatolian Tocharian Indic Iranian Greek Italic Celtic Germanic Balto -Slavic Albanian t t· t t,tʰ t, θ t t t/tʰ θ t t dʱ d̥ t,ts <* dʱ dʱ/d d (θ) tʰ f/ ð d d/ð d d d d̥ ts <* d d d (θ) d d d t(tʰ/ts ) :d d Balto-Slavic :d = voiced with lengthening/acute effect (Winter’s Law) Models of the PIE stop system, exemplified by dentals Traditional Hopper Gamkrelidze Vennemann/ Normier Kortlandt Haider/Kümmel/Weiss t t tʰ~t tʰ t t dʱ dʱ/d dʱ~d d̥ d̥ʰ ~d̥ d>dʱ d t’/ t̰ t’ t’ d̰ [ˀ ɗ̥] ɗ>d (T = “neo-traditional/mainstream”; H = Hopper 1973/1977; G = Gamkrelidze 1973; N = Normier 1977, V = Vennemann 1984; K = Andreev 1957; Kortlandt 1978a, 1985; Haider 1983; Kümmel 2009/2012; Weiss 2009) Kortlandt’s “preglottalized lenis” = “voiceless/glottalized implosive“ (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • General Linguistics and Indo-European Reconstruction
    GENERAL LINGUISTICS AND INDO-EUROPEAN RECONSTRUCTION Frederik Kortlandt There is good reason to be ambivalent about the usefulness of general considerations in linguistic reconstruction. As a heuristic device, a theoretical framework can certainly be helpful, but the negative potential of aprioristic considerations must not be underestimated. E.g., there is a whole range of phenomena which receive a natural explanation when we assume that glottalization is ancient in Germanic. The methodological question is: why have scholars been reluctant to identify the vestjysk stød with the English glottalization as a historical reality which may have been inher- ited from the proto-language? The role of general linguistics is to provide an idea of what can be expected in linguistic development, not by theoretical reasoning but by inspection of what actually happens. Denmark has always been a superpower in linguistics. There is no need to list all famous scholars who worked in this country and left their imprint on the history of linguistics, but there are two names which I want to mention here, viz. Otto Jespersen and Holger Pedersen. The point is that we have a lesson to learn from these two great scholars in connection with the relation between general linguis- tics and Indo-European reconstruction. Otto Jespersen was not only a great phonetician, but is regarded by some as the founder and by others as the forerunner of modern syntax. His Philosophy of Grammar is a classic for linguists of very different theoretical persuasions. The point I want to emphasize here, is that Jespersen was very well informed about the comparative linguistics of his time, and was therefore in a very good position to hold strong views about what his colleagues were and were not doing.
    [Show full text]
  • Ling 150, Historical Linguistics Moore, Spring 2013 Indo-European
    Ling 150, Historical Linguistics Moore, Spring 2013 Indo-European Stop Reconstructions 1. The ‘classic’ Brugmann reconstruction • A fairly strict adherence to the comparative method yields 15 distinct stop phonemes. The classic Neogrammarian reconstruction, proposed by Karl Brugmannin 1886, involves three series (voiceless, voiced, voiced aspirated), four points of articulation (labial, coronal, palatal, velar), plus a series of labio-velars: (1) labial coronal palatal velar labio-velar voiceless *p *t *ḱ *k *kw voiced *b *d *ǵ *g *gw voiced aspirated *bh *bh *ǵh *gh *ghw • The centum languages merged the palatal and velar stops, while the satem languages merged the velar and labio-velar stops. Furthermore, the palatal stops are realized as some kind of palatal or palato-alveolar affricates/fricatives in the satem languages. • Sanskrit underwent a subsequent ‘secondary palatalization’ (the Law of the Palatals), which palatalized both plain and labio-velars before front vowels. Because Sanskrit mid-vowels merges with *a (yielding a single low vowel), the environment for this secondary palatalization is opaque in Sanskrit. • This is referred to as the ‘three-velar’ analysis (palatal velars, plain velars, and labio-velars) 2. Meillet’s Alternative • Antoine Meillet (1894) argued agains the three velar analysis and proposed an alternative two-velar analysis: (2) labial coronal velar labio-velar voiceless *p *t *k *kw voiced *b *d *g *gw voiced aspirated *bh *bh *gh *ghw • This analysis simplifies the Brugmann system, but requires a more speculative account of the satem/centum distinction. • According to this account, in satem languages, some plain velars palatalized, while others didn’t – the environments are complex.
    [Show full text]
  • A GRAMMAR of MODERN INDO-EUROPEAN Original Plain Velars) but Not Others (Those from Original Labiovelars)
    Appendix II: Proto-Indo-European Phonology APPENDIX II: PROTO-INDO-EUROPEAN PHONOLOGY II.1. DORSALS: THE PALATOVELAR QUESTION 1. Direct comparison in early IE studies, informed by the Centum-Satem isogloss, yielded the reconstruction of three rows of dorsal consonants in Late Proto-Indo- European by Bezzenberger (1890), a theory which became classic after Brugmann (Grundriss, 1879) included it in its 2nd Edition. The palatovelars *kj, *gj, and *gjh were supposedly [k]- or [g]-like sounds which underwent a characteristic phonetic change in the satemized languages – three original “velar rows” had then become two in all Indo- European dialects attested. NOTE. It is disputed whether Albanian shows remains of two or three series (cf. Ölberg 1976, Kortlandt 1980, Pänzer 1982), although the fact that only the worst known (and neither isolated nor remote) IE dialect could be the only one to show some remains of the oldest phonetic system is indeed very unlikely. After that original belief, then, The centum group of languages merged the palatovelars *kj, *gj, and *gjh with the plain velars *k, *g, and *gh, while the satem group of languages merged the labiovelars *kw, *gw, and *gwh with the plain velars *k,* g, and *gh. NOTE. Such hypothesis would then support an evolution [kj] → [k] of Centum dialects before e and i, what is clearly against the general tendence of velars to move forward its articulation and palatalize in these environments. 2. The existence of the palatovelars as phonemes separate from the plain velars and labiovelars has been disputed. In most circumstances they appear to be allophones resulting from the neutralization of the other two series in particular phonetic circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • Productivity in Historical Linguistics Computational Perspectives on Word-Formation in Ancient Greek and Sanskrit
    University of California Los Angeles Productivity in Historical Linguistics Computational Perspectives on Word-Formation in Ancient Greek and Sanskrit A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Indo-European Studies by Ryan Paul Sandell 2015 © Copyright by Ryan Paul Sandell 2015 Abstract of the Dissertation Productivity in Historical Linguistics Computational Perspectives on Word-Formation in Ancient Greek and Sanskrit by Ryan Paul Sandell Doctor of Philosophy in Indo-European Studies University of California, Los Angeles, 2015 Professor Brent Harmon Vine, Chair “Productivity” is a simultaneously familiar and fraught topic for all linguists. Every linguist believes that he can recognize it, yet grasping what properties characterize a “productive” process in opposition to a non-productive one is difficult. The historical linguist ought to be particularly desperate for a definition that can be operationalized – distinguishing ar- chaism from innovation depends upon it. This dissertation is therefore first concerned with transforming “productivity” into an object that can be interrogated, and then seeking tools that can provide a useful characterization that object. On the explicitly diachronic side, I am concerned with how to measure, diagnose, and motivate changes in productivity. Cor- pora from two the oldest-attested Indo-European languages, Ancient Greek (here, mainly the Iliad and Odyssey, as well as the New Testament) and Vedic Sanskrit (here, mainly the R̥gveda) will guide and define these explorations. Within the realm of morphology and word- formation especially, I will argue that concerns about productivity rightly take pride of place in diachronic discussion, and that those discussions become more meaningful when made precise and psychologically motivated.
    [Show full text]
  • Burushaski Shepherd Vocabulary of Indo-European Origin Ilija Čašule
    Acta Orientalia 2009: 70, 147–195. Copyright © 2009 Printed in Norway – all rights reserved ACTA ORIENTALIA ISSN 0001-6483 Burushaski Shepherd Vocabulary of Indo-European Origin Ilija aule Macquarie University Abstract The etymological analysis of Burushaski shepherd vocabulary shows that almost all the pastoral terms in this language are of Indo- European origin (some thirty independently of Indic and Iranian), with a significant proportion showing close correlations with the Paleobalkanic substratal shepherd terms. Considering the conserva- tism of this semantic field and together with the precise, specific and systematic phonological, grammatical and lexical correspondences, this is further evidence for the Indo-European and Balkan origin of Burushaski. Keywords: Burushaski, etymology, shepherd vocabulary, Indo- European, ancient Balkan languages, Albanian and Rumanian substratum. 1. Introduction Burushaski, still considered a language-isolate,1 is spoken by around 90,000 people (Berger 1990: 567) in the Karakoram area in North- 1 There have been many unsuccessful attempts at correlating it with Basque, Nubian, the Dravidian languages, Munda, various Caucasic languages, 148 ILIJA AULE West Pakistan at the junction of three linguistic families – the Indo- European (Indo-Aryan and Iranian), the Sino-Tibetan and the Turkic. Its dialectal differentiation is minor. There are three very closely related dialects: Hunza and Nager with minimal differences, and the Yasin dialect, which exhibits differential traits, but is still mutually intelligible with the former two. The earliest sketchy descriptions and word lists of Burushaski are from the mid to late nineteenth century (e.g. Cunningham 1854; Hayward 1871; Biddulph 1880; Leitner 1889). The limited dialectal differentiation and the lack of older attestations make the internal historical reconstruction extremely difficult.
    [Show full text]