Student ID ______TA Name ______Section ______[8 PAGES - 44 QUESTIONS]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Student ID ______TA Name ______Section ______[8 PAGES - 44 QUESTIONS] Full Name _____________________________________________ Date --12/08/14-- Student ID ____________ TA Name ___________________________________________Section ______ [8 PAGES - 44 QUESTIONS] 1. Here is a series of moon phases, top row, starting with the new moon on November 22, a full moon on December 6, and a new moon on December 22. What does today’s moon phase look like? Choose among those phases labeled “A, B, C, D, or E” – all are labeled December 8, but only 1 is correct. Figure 1. Phases of the Moon from November 22 to December 22, 2014 The phases of the moon progress smoothly. “C” is the correct answer, and if you examine the full moon just above, you will see that “C” is not a perfect circle. Besides, it is just 2 days past the full moon. “B” cannot be right because there are 6 days between the 8th and the 14th when there is a 3rd quarter moon – and the moon takes about 7 days between full and 3rd quarter. 2. No matter where you live on Earth, there is a location that has the same latitude but is 180° away in longitude (on the opposite side of Earth). The next new moon for us is December 22. When is the next new moon for people living on the opposite side of the Earth? a. December 8 (today) b. December 15 c. December 22 d. December 29 3. First, remove Earth’s atmosphere; then, climb to the roof of the UW Tower and drop a hammer and a feather. What is the physical explanation for the objects falling at exactly the same acceleration? a. The larger force needed to accelerate the hammer comes from the equally larger mass, so the acceleration of the hammer and feather remains the same. b. Everyone knows that objects fall at the same rate on Earth, 9.81 m/s2. c. The mass of the Earth is so much greater than the mass of even the hammer that the gravitational force on each object is identical. d. Because the feather has more inertia than the hammer, it is able to fall to the Earth faster and thus will hit the ground at the same time as the hammer. Figure 2. A recreation of the astronauts on the Moon experiment 4. Superman left the planet Krypton as an infant 27 years ago just before its destruction. Krypton orbited the star Caph, a spectral type F star. Caph is 54 light years away; thus Superman could have looked back in time and seen his home blow up. Here’s the question: The full spectrum of light was emitted during the explosion of Krypton. Which kind of signal reached Superman first and why? a. X-ray signals because x-rays have the high energy, high frequency, and thus faster speed. b. Radio signals because although they have the lower energy, the wavelengths are very long. c. Visible light captured by the Hubble Space Telescope because of its being above the atmosphere. d. All are forms of electromagnetic radiation traveling at light speed and thus reached us at the same time. 9 December 2014 final-exam_autumn2014-analysis.docx 1 5. Which one of the following statements is NOT correct about the relationship among the luminosity, surface temperature, and overall color pattern of a star? a. The luminosity, surface temperature, and overall color pattern of a star are related. b. The cooler a star is, the less luminous it is, and its spectrum will peak at longer wavelengths. c. The hotter the star, the more luminous it is, and the brighter the colors will be overall. d. For stars having orbiting planets, if the surface temperature of a star increases, its luminosity does not. DIRECT from one of the quizzes Figure 3. Thermal radiation curves of four stars. 6. What information about these 4 stars could be inferred directly from values on this chart? a. The approximate distances they are from Earth in parsecs. b. Whether or not they will go supernovae or form planetary nebulae. c. Fairly reliable estimates of their surface temperatures. d. Their parallax shifts when their luminosities are known. 7. What is the difference between the interstellar medium (ISM), a molecular cloud, and a protostar? a. The ISM contains everything: hot gas, dust, molecular clouds, stuff not part of a protostar. b. The only difference is density: protostars are less dense than the ISM and molecular clouds. c. The ISM is a broad category that excludes molecular clouds, protostars, and also HII regions. d. The ISM is much cooler and denser than either a molecular cloud, an HII region, or a protostar. 8. You have examined images of cool dust shown glowing in “false” colors. The colors represented have to be called “false” because the overall blackbody (thermal) curves peak at wavelengths a. in the ultraviolet part of the spectrum. b. in the visible part of the spectrum but at colors unknown to us. c. in the infrared part of the spectrum. d. that are much longer than microwave wavelengths. 2 Figure 4. Cut away of the Sun (left) and approximate temperatures above the photosphere and to the core. The heights in the right-hand figure are not exact. A points to dark features on the photosphere, which is represented by B. Use Fig. 4 to answer the next 5 questions. 9. (1 pt) Contains the coolest region where absorption lines form. B 10. (1 pt) Energy gets through this region via the “random walk.” D 11. (1 pt) Magnetic fields from Sun’s interior poke out in these photospheric dark regions. A 12. (1 pt) The “boiling” movement of the gas transports energy through this region. E 13. (1 pt) The only region where fusion occurs. C 14. Both of the following statements are either True (a) or False (b): If a star has an apparent magnitude of 5 it is brighter than a star whose apparent magnitude is 8. If a star has an absolute magnitude of −6, it is more luminous than a star whose absolute magnitude is −1. Covered in lecture, covered when working on the CMDs, covered indirectly with the distances to the clusters, included on an HR Diagram…. 15. Particles and energy are produced in the proton-proton fusion cycle of the Sun and other stars. What part of the fusion cycle is most responsible for supporting the Sun against gravitational collapse? a. the neutrinos that are formed in the first step. b. the positrons that are formed in the first step. c. the gamma rays that are produced in steps 1 and 2. d. the two protons released at the end when the helium nucleus is created. What does the fusion process produce? Neutrinos go straight out unimpeded; positrons annihilate with electrons to produce gamma rays; two protons at the end only get put back into the next fusion process. We worked through the whole proton-proton cycle sheet in lecture, and the image was included in the cover sheet with the exam. TO BE REGRADED. Spectral Apparent V Parallax Star Name Type Magnitude (arc sec) Asellus Borealis A1 IV 4.67 0.018 Asellus Australis K0 III 3.94 0.025 Acubens A5 V 4.26 0.017 Al Tarf K4 III 3.52 0.011 kappa Cancri B8 III 5.24 0.006 Figure 5. The constellation Cancer and named and numbered stars (Star information gathered from SIMBAD.) The constellation Cancer will cross the meridian at midnight on February 2, 2015. Review the data listed in the above table on 5 of its brightest stars and answer the following 4 questions. 16. (1 pt) Which of these two stars – a. kappa Cancri (0.006) or b. Asellus Australis (0.025) – is farther away? 3 17. (1 pt) Which of these two stars – a. Acubens (A5V) or b. Al Tarf (K4III)– has a higher temperature? OBAFGKM 18. (1 pt) Which of these two stars – a. Al Tarf (3.52) or b. kappa Cancri (5.24) – is brighter? Smaller apparent magnitude means brighter. Emphasized many times in lecture; worked on in fitting the main sequences of the clusters. 19. Asellus Australis and Al Tarf are both K giants, with close to the same brightness, and yet Al Tarf is over two times farther away. Which star must be more luminous? a. Asellus Australis b. Al Tarf c. Not enough information is given to answer this question. Same brightness in the sky, but one is 2 times farther away. The one that is farther away has to be more luminous if it is farther away but has the same brightness in the sky. There are two open clusters “in” Cancer, Messier 44 (Praesepe) and Messier 67, indicated by the circles, arrows, and labels in Fig. 5. Here are their actual color-magnitude diagrams. 20. Which cluster is older? a. Messier 44 (M44) b. Messier 67 (M67) 21. If a main sequence star in M44 with B - V = 1 has an apparent magnitude of 13.5 and a main sequence star in M67 with B - V = 1 has an apparent magnitude of 16.5, which cluster is farther away? a. Messier 44 (M44) b. Messier 67 (M67) c. Not enough information is given. Cluster fitting activity; also, along the main a. Praesepe b. Messier 67 sequence, stars have same mass that have same temperature and have same luminosity ! a primary feature of the HR Diagram. Thus, at a given temperature, the dimmer the star, the farther away the cluster is. Figure 6. The color-magnitude diagrams of 2 open clusters in the constellation of Cancer.
Recommended publications
  • Ann Merchant Boesgaard Publications Merchant, A. E., Bodenheimer, P., and Wallerstein, G
    Ann Merchant Boesgaard Publications Merchant, A. E., Bodenheimer, P., and Wallerstein, G. (1965). “The Lithium Isotope Ratio in Two Hyades F Stars.” Ap. J., 142, 790. Merchant, A. E. (1966). “Beryllium in F- and G-Type Dwarfs.” Ap. J., 143, 336. Hodge, P. W., and Merchant, A. E. (1966). “Photometry of SO Galaxies II. The Peculiar Galaxy NGC 128.” Ap. J., 144, 875. Merchant, A. E. (1967). “The Abundance of Lithium in Early M-Type Stars.” Ap. J., 147, 587. Merchant, A. E. (1967). “Measured Equivalent Widths in Early M-Type Stars.” Lick Obs. Bull. No. 595 (Univ. of California Press). Boesgaard, A. M. (1968). “Isotopes of Magnesium in Stellar Atmosphere.” Ap. J., 154, 185. Boesgaard, A. M. (1968). “Observations of Beryllium in Stars.” Highlights of Astron- omy, ed. L. Perek (Dordrecht: D. Reidel), p. 237. Boesgaard, A. M. (1969). “Intensity Variation in Ca Emission in an MS Star.” Pub. A. S. P., 81, 283. Boesgaard, A. M. (1969). “Observational Clues to the Evolution of M Giant Stars.” Pub. A. S. P., 81, 365. Boesgaard, A. M. (1970). “The Lithium Isotope Ratio in δ Sagittae.” Ap. J., 159, 727. Boesgaard, A. M. (1970). “The Ratio of Titanium to Zirconium in Late-Type Stars.” Ap. J., 161, 163. Boesgaard, A. M. (1970). “On the Lithium Content in Late-Type Giants.” Ap. Letters, 5, 145. Boesgaard, A. M. (1970). “Lithium in Heavy-Metal Red Giants.” Ap. J., 161, 1003. Boesgaard, A. M. (1971). “The Lithium Content of Capella.” Ap. J., 167, 511. Boesgaard, A. M. (1973). “Iron Emission Lines in a Orionis.” In Stellar Chromospheres, eds.
    [Show full text]
  • Milan Dimitrijevic Avgust.Qxd
    1. M. Platiša, M. Popović, M. Dimitrijević, N. Konjević: 1975, Z. Fur Natur- forsch. 30a, 212 [A 1].* 1. Griem, H. R.: 1975, Stark Broadening, Adv. Atom. Molec. Phys. 11, 331. 2. Platiša, M., Popović, M. V., Konjević, N.: 1975, Stark broadening of O II and O III lines, Astron. Astrophys. 45, 325. 3. Konjević, N., Wiese, W. L.: 1976, Experimental Stark widths and shifts for non-hydrogenic spectral lines of ionized atoms, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 5, 259. 4. Hey, J. D.: 1977, On the Stark broadening of isolated lines of F (II) and Cl (III) by plasmas, JQSRT 18, 649. 5. Hey, J. D.: 1977, Estimates of Stark broadening of some Ar III and Ar IV lines, JQSRT 17, 729. 6. Hey, J. D.: Breger, P.: 1980, Stark broadening of isolated lines emitted by singly - ionized tin, JQSRT 23, 311. 7. Hey, J. D.: Breger, P.: 1981, Stark broadening of isolated ion lines by plas- mas: Application of theory, in Spectral Line Shapes I, ed. B. Wende, W. de Gruyter, 201. 8. Сыркин, М. И.: 1981, Расчеты электронного уширения спектральных линий в теории оптических свойств плазмы, Опт. Спектроск. 51, 778. 9. Wiese, W. L., Konjević, N.: 1982, Regularities and similarities in plasma broadened spectral line widths (Stark widths), JQSRT 28, 185. 10. Konjević, N., Pittman, T. P.: 1986, Stark broadening of spectral lines of ho- mologous, doubly ionized inert gases, JQSRT 35, 473. 11. Konjević, N., Pittman, T. P.: 1987, Stark broadening of spectral lines of ho- mologous, doubly - ionized inert gases, JQSRT 37, 311. 12. Бабин, С.
    [Show full text]
  • Cfa in the News ~ Week Ending 3 January 2010
    Wolbach Library: CfA in the News ~ Week ending 3 January 2010 1. New social science research from G. Sonnert and co-researchers described, Science Letter, p40, Tuesday, January 5, 2010 2. 2009 in science and medicine, ROGER SCHLUETER, Belleville News Democrat (IL), Sunday, January 3, 2010 3. 'Science, celestial bodies have always inspired humankind', Staff Correspondent, Hindu (India), Tuesday, December 29, 2009 4. Why is Carpenter defending scientists?, The Morning Call, Morning Call (Allentown, PA), FIRST ed, pA25, Sunday, December 27, 2009 5. CORRECTIONS, OPINION BY RYAN FINLEY, ARIZONA DAILY STAR, Arizona Daily Star (AZ), FINAL ed, pA2, Saturday, December 19, 2009 6. We see a 'Super-Earth', TOM BEAL; TOM BEAL, ARIZONA DAILY STAR, Arizona Daily Star, (AZ), FINAL ed, pA1, Thursday, December 17, 2009 Record - 1 DIALOG(R) New social science research from G. Sonnert and co-researchers described, Science Letter, p40, Tuesday, January 5, 2010 TEXT: "In this paper we report on testing the 'rolen model' and 'opportunity-structure' hypotheses about the parents whom scientists mentioned as career influencers. According to the role-model hypothesis, the gender match between scientist and influencer is paramount (for example, women scientists would disproportionately often mention their mothers as career influencers)," scientists writing in the journal Social Studies of Science report (see also ). "According to the opportunity-structure hypothesis, the parent's educational level predicts his/her probability of being mentioned as a career influencer (that ism parents with higher educational levels would be more likely to be named). The examination of a sample of American scientists who had received prestigious postdoctoral fellowships resulted in rejecting the role-model hypothesis and corroborating the opportunity-structure hypothesis.
    [Show full text]
  • FY13 High-Level Deliverables
    National Optical Astronomy Observatory Fiscal Year Annual Report for FY 2013 (1 October 2012 – 30 September 2013) Submitted to the National Science Foundation Pursuant to Cooperative Support Agreement No. AST-0950945 13 December 2013 Revised 18 September 2014 Contents NOAO MISSION PROFILE .................................................................................................... 1 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 2 2 NOAO ACCOMPLISHMENTS ....................................................................................... 4 2.1 Achievements ..................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Status of Vision and Goals ................................................................................. 5 2.2.1 Status of FY13 High-Level Deliverables ............................................ 5 2.2.2 FY13 Planned vs. Actual Spending and Revenues .............................. 8 2.3 Challenges and Their Impacts ............................................................................ 9 3 SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES AND FINDINGS .............................................................. 11 3.1 Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory ....................................................... 11 3.2 Kitt Peak National Observatory ....................................................................... 14 3.3 Gemini Observatory ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • On the Application of Stark Broadening Data Determined with a Semiclassical Perturbation Approach
    Atoms 2014, 2, 357-377; doi:10.3390/atoms2030357 OPEN ACCESS atoms ISSN 2218-2004 www.mdpi.com/journal/atoms Article On the Application of Stark Broadening Data Determined with a Semiclassical Perturbation Approach Milan S. Dimitrijević 1,2,* and Sylvie Sahal-Bréchot 2 1 Astronomical Observatory, Volgina 7, 11060 Belgrade, Serbia 2 Laboratoire d'Etude du Rayonnement et de la Matière en Astrophysique, Observatoire de Paris, UMR CNRS 8112, UPMC, 5 Place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon Cedex, France; E-Mail: [email protected] (S.S.-B.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +381-64-297-8021; Fax: +381-11-2419-553. Received: 5 May 2014; in revised form: 20 June 2014 / Accepted: 16 July 2014 / Published: 7 August 2014 Abstract: The significance of Stark broadening data for problems in astrophysics, physics, as well as for technological plasmas is discussed and applications of Stark broadening parameters calculated using a semiclassical perturbation method are analyzed. Keywords: Stark broadening; isolated lines; impact approximation 1. Introduction Stark broadening parameters of neutral atom and ion lines are of interest for a number of problems in astrophysical, laboratory, laser produced, fusion or technological plasma investigations. Especially the development of space astronomy has enabled the collection of a huge amount of spectroscopic data of all kinds of celestial objects within various spectral ranges. Consequently, the atomic data for trace elements, which had not been
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report the Goddard High Resolution Spectrograph Scientific
    NASA-CR-204980 Final Report The Goddard High Resolution Spectrograph Scientific Support Contract NAS5-32494 December 13, 1993 - December 12, 1996 Computer Sciences Corporation 4061 Powder Mill Road Calverton, MD 20705 GHRS SSC Final Report i Contents List of Acronyms iv I. Introduction II. Summary of Activities 4 1 Project Support - Subtask 1 4 1.1 Proposal Preparation and Tracking ..................... 4 1.2 SMOV and Post-COSTAR Calibration ................... 5 1.3 In-Orbit Performance Papers ........................ 7 1.4 Operations Studies .............................. 7 1.4.1 GHRS Efficiency ........................... 7 1.4.2 GHRS Low-Noise Orbits ....................... 8 1.5 Meetings and Information Distribution ................... 9 1.6 Public Information .............................. 9 1.7 The World Wide Web ............................ 10 1.8 The GHRS Science Symposium ....................... 11 2 Data Analysis Facility - Subtask 2 12 2.1 Facility Management ............................. 12 2.2 GHRS Archive ................................ 13 2.3 GHRS Team Software ............................ 15 2.4 General Software Support .......................... 15 2.5 Data Bases .................................. 16 2.6 Data Reduction and Analysis Assistance .................. 17 3 Extragalactic Imagery- Subtask 3 17 3.1 Analysis of R136 ............................... 17 3.2 Eta Carinae .................................. 19 3.3 Star Clusters in M33 ............................. 19 3.3.1 NGC 595 ............................... 20 3.3,2
    [Show full text]
  • Clusters Nebulae & Galaxies
    CLUSTERS, NEBULAE & GALAXIES A NOVICE OBSERVER’S HANDBOOK By: Prof. P. N. Shankar PREFACE In the normal course of events, an amateur who builds or acquires a telescope will use it initially to observe the Moon and the planets. After the thrill of seeing the craters of the Moon, the Galilean moons of Jupiter and its bands, and the rings of Saturn he(*) is usually at a loss as to what to do next; Mars and Venus are usually disappointing as are the stars (they don’t look any bigger!). If the telescope had good resolution one could observe binaries, but alas, this is often not the case. Moreover, at this stage, the amateur is unlikely to be willing to do serious work on variable stars or on planetary observations. What can he do with his telescope that will rekindle his interest and prepare him for serious work? I believe that there is little better for him to do than hunt for the Messier objects; this book is meant as a guide in this exciting adventure. While this book is primarily a guide to the Messier objects, a few other easy clusters and nebulae have also been included. I have tried, while writing this handbook, to keep in mind the difficulties faced by a beginner. Even if one has good star maps, such as those in Norton’s Star Atlas, a beginner often has difficulty in locating some of the Messier objects because he does not know what he is expected to see! A cluster like M29 is a little difficult because it is a sparse cluster in a rich field; M97 is nominally brighter than M76, another planetary, but is more difficult to see; M33 is an approximately 6th magnitude galaxy but is far more difficult than many 9th magnitude galaxies.
    [Show full text]
  • July 2013 Damoiseau-A
    A PUBLICATION OF THE LUNAR SECTION OF THE A.L.P.O. EDITED BY: Wayne Bailey [email protected] 17 Autumn Lane, Sewell, NJ 08080 RECENT BACK ISSUES: http://moon.scopesandscapes.com/tlo_back.html FEATURE OF THE MONTH – JULY 2013 DAMOISEAU-A Sketch and text by Robert H. Hays, Jr. - Worth, Illinois, USA February 24, 2013 05:05-05:45 UT, 15 cm refl, 170x, seeing 7-8/10 I observed this area on the evening of Feb. 23/24, 2013 after the moon hid kappa Cancri. This area is just south-east of Grimaldi. Lunar librations were favorable for it that evening. Damoiseau A has a low but complete rim from its south end counter-clockwise around to its west side where it meets Damoiseau D. Southward from D, the rim of A becomes ill-defined and peters out, leaving a gap in its south end. Damoiseau D is an egg-shaped crater with its tapered end to the south. Damoiseau AA is the small pit inside the north rim of Damoiseau A, and Damoiseau AB is the similar pit to the east. The floor of Damoiseau A otherwise appears very smooth. Low ridges and strips of shadow protrude from various points on its rim. The southeast rim of Damoiseau A merges smoothly into a strip of dark shadow that ends at Damoiseau F. The Lunar Quadrant map shows a fault there. A small crater is just south of F and a larger shallower crater is to i s east. Neither of these two craters are shown on the Lunar Quadrant map.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Rotation Arund the Axis on the Stars, Galaxy and Rotation of Universe* Weitter Duckss1
    Effects of Rotation Arund the Axis on the Stars, Galaxy and Rotation of Universe* Weitter Duckss1 1Independent Researcher, Zadar, Croatia *Project: https://www.svemir-ipaksevrti.com/Universe-and-rotation.html; (https://www.svemir-ipaksevrti.com/) Abstract: The article analyzes the blueshift of the objects, through realized measurements of galaxies, mergers and collisions of galaxies and clusters of galaxies and measurements of different galactic speeds, where the closer galaxies move faster than the significantly more distant ones. The clusters of galaxies are analyzed through their non-zero value rotations and gravitational connection of objects inside a cluster, supercluster or a group of galaxies. The constant growth of objects and systems is visible through the constant influx of space material to Earth and other objects inside our system, through percussive craters, scattered around the system, collisions and mergers of objects, galaxies and clusters of galaxies. Atom and its formation, joining into pairs, growth and disintegration are analyzed through atoms of the same values of structure, different aggregate states and contiguous atoms of different aggregate states. The disintegration of complex atoms is followed with the temperature increase above the boiling point of atoms and compounds. The effects of rotation around an axis are analyzed from the small objects through stars, galaxies, superclusters and to the rotation of Universe. The objects' speeds of rotation and their effects are analyzed through the formation and appearance of a system (the formation of orbits, the asteroid belt, gas disk, the appearance of galaxies), its influence on temperature, surface gravity, the force of a magnetic field, the size of a radius.
    [Show full text]
  • Ankara Üniversitesi Akademik Arşiv Sistemi
    ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ DÜŞÜK GENLİKLİ δ SCUTI YILDIZI 20 CVn’NİN ELEMENT BOLLUK ÇALIŞMASI Tolgahan KILIÇOĞLU ASTRONOMİ VE UZAY BİLİMLERİ ANABİLİM DALI ANKARA 2008 Her hakkı saklıdır ÖZET Yüksek Lisans Tezi DÜŞÜK GENLİKLİ δ SCUTI YILDIZI 20 CVn’NİN ELEMENT BOLLUK ÇALIŞMASI Tolgahan KILIÇOĞLU Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Astronomi ve Uzay Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı Danışman : Yrd. Doç. Dr. Kutluay YÜCE Eş Danışman: Prof. Dr. Saul J. ADELMAN Bu tez çalışmasında, 20 CVn (F3 III) yıldızının, Dominion Astrofizik Gözlemevi’ndeki (Victoria, Kanada) 1.2 m’lik teleskoba bağlı Coude tayfçekerindeki Reticon ve CCD algılayıcılarla elde edilen yüksek kaliteli tayflar kullanılarak atmosfer parametreleri ve element bollukları tespit edilmiştir. Optik bölgenin λλ3820-4940 Å dalgaboyu aralığını içeren tayflar, Dr. Graham Hill ve arkadaşları (Hill et al. 1982a,b) tarafından yazılan REDUCE ve VLINE programları kullanılarak ölçülmüştür. Her tayf çizgisine ait merkezi dalgaboyu, eşdeğer genişlik, derinlik ve yarı maksimumdaki tam genişlik değerleri bulundu. Atmosfer analizi, Dr. Robert L. Kurucz (Kurucz 1993)’un yerel termodinamik denge varsayımlı, paralel düzlem geometrili ATLAS9 ve O’nun ilgili programları kullanılarak gerçekleştirildi. 20 CVn’nin çizgi tanısı yapıldıktan sonra, atmosferindeki atom ve iyonlar tespit edilmiş oldu. Çizgi tanısı, benzer tür yıldızlar için yapılacak tayfsal çalışmalar için yararlı olacaktır. Etkin sıcaklık ve yüzey çekim ivmesi, gözlemsel ve kuramsal Hγ profillerinin karşılaştırılmasından, spektrofotometrik akıların, teorik profil ve akılarla karşılaştırılmasından ve nötr ve bir kez iyonlaşmış demir çizgileri kullanılarak demir elementinin iyonizasyon dengesinden elde edilmiştir. 20 CVn için elde -1 edilen değerler: Te = 6950 K and log g = 2.80 dir. Mikrotürbülans hızı 2.6 km sn olarak hesaplandı.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2017 BRAS Newsletter
    JanuaryOctober 2017 2016 Issue Issue th Next Meeting: Monday, January 9 at 7PM at HRPO (2nd Mondays, Highland Road Park Observatory) What's In This Issue? President’s Message Secretary's Summary of December Meeting Outreach Report Light Pollution Committee Report Recent Forum Entries Christmas Party Pics 20/20 Vision Campaign Messages from the HRPO Observing Notes – Eridanus – The River, , by John Nagle & Mythology Newsletter of the Baton Rouge Astronomical Society January 2017 President’s Message A new year is here, and we look forward to all that can happen, and we look back on all that has happened. In 2016, BRAS gained some new members, and on December 27th we lost one of our founding members - Wally Pursell. Wally was active in BRAS to the last, a friend to everyone, and will be sorely missed. Due to the suddenness of this event and the rush of the holidays, we will include a memorial page to Wally in our February newsletter.. Please send Michele your photos to [email protected]. Meanwhile, please feel free to visit Wally’s online Legacy Page to read the farewell comments and add your own at: Wallace Pursell’s Legacy Page http://www.legacy.com/guestbooks/theadvocate/wallace-pursell- condolences/183224987 th Everyone is invited to the BRAS business meeting on Jan. 4 at HRPO – starting at 6:00 PM. th At the next regular membership meeting on Jan. 9 . Dr. Brad Schaefer will be giving the program: What Will You Do When the Next Carrington Event Strikes Earth?. 2017 BRAS dues are due! See Trey at the meeting, or send the dues in with the membership form (available on line or at HRPO).
    [Show full text]
  • Observing List
    day month year Epoch 2000 local clock time: 2.00 Observing List for 16 12 2019 RA DEC alt az Constellation object mag A mag B Separation description hr min deg min 28 303 Andromeda Gamma Andromedae (*266) 2.3 5.5 9.8 yellow & blue green double star 2 3.9 42 19 21 312 Andromeda STF 79 (Struve) 6 7 7.8 bluish pair 1 0.1 44 42 28 299 Andromeda 59 Andromedae 6.5 7 16.6 neat pair, both greenish blue 2 10.9 39 2 16 312 Andromeda M31 (Andromeda Galaxy) large sprial arm galaxy like the Milky Way 0 42.7 41 16 16 311 Andromeda M32 satellite galaxy of Andromeda Galaxy 0 42.7 40 52 16 312 Andromeda M110 (NGC205) satellite galaxy of Andromeda Galaxy 0 40.4 41 41 25 299 Andromeda NGC752 large open cluster of 60 stars 1 57.8 37 41 32 301 Andromeda NGC891 edge on galaxy, needle-like in appearance 2 22.6 42 21 13 327 Andromeda NGC7686 open cluster of 20 stars 23 30.2 49 8 15 287 Aries 1 Arietis 6.2 7.2 2.8 fine yellow & pale blue pair 1 50.1 22 17 25 282 Aries 30 Arietis 6.6 7.4 38.6 pleasing yellow pair 2 37 24 39 27 284 Aries 33 Arietis 5.5 8.4 28.6 yellowish-white & blue pair 2 40.7 27 4 27 276 Aries 48, Epsilon Arietis 5.2 5.5 1.5 white pair, splittable @ 150x 2 59.2 21 20 13 284 Aries 5, Gamma Arietis (*262) 4.8 4.8 7.8 nice bluish-white pair 1 53.5 19 18 17 287 Aries 9, Lambda Arietis (*264) 4.9 7.7 37.4 yellow-wht & pale blue 1 57.9 23 36 27 287 Aries NGC972 Galaxy, oval shaped 2 34.2 29 19 63 265 Auriga M36 Pinwheel Cluster open cluster of a dozen or so young stars (30million years old) 5 36.1 34 8 65 259 Auriga M37 January Salt and Pepper Cluster
    [Show full text]