One Hundred and Twenty-Five Years of the Annals of Botany

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

One Hundred and Twenty-Five Years of the Annals of Botany Annals of Botany 115: 1–18, 2015 doi:10.1093/aob/mcu220, available online at www.aob.oxfordjournals.org HISTORY One hundred and twenty-five years of the Annals of Botany. Part 1: the first 50 years (1887–1936) Michael B. Jackson* School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK * For correspondence. E-mail [email protected] Received: 19 July 2014 Returned for revision: 21 August 2014 Accepted: 19 September 2014 Background The Annals of Botany is a peer-reviewed scientific journal publishing papers on a wide range of topics in plant biology. It first appeared in 1887, making it the oldest continuously published botanical title. The present article gives a historical account of events leading to the founding of the Journal and of its development over the first 50 years. Sources of Information Much of the content is drawn from the Journal’s own records and from extensive Minutes, financial accounts, personal letters and notes relating to the Annals of Botany that were repatriated from University College, University of London in 1999. Documents held at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew and at the Oxford University Press Museum were also consulted. Content Emphasis is placed on the individuals who instigated, edited and managed the Annals of Botany up to 1937, especially the nine founding members of the Journal and the background that brought them together and motivated them to start the Annals of Botany. A falling out between two of the founders in 1899 is highlighted since not only did this threaten the Journal’s future but also gives much insight into the personalities of those most closely involved in the Journal during its formative years. The article also examines the way the Journal was funded and how it dealt with its publisher (the University of Oxford’s Clarendon Press), turned itself into a registered company (the Annals of Botany Company) and coped with the travails of the First World War, currency inflation and the Great Depression. Plans to re-start the Journal as a New Series, beginning in 1937, are discussed in the context of the competition the Annals of Botany then faced from younger journals. Key words: Annals of Botany, Annals of Botany Company, Clarendon Press, history of science, Oxford University Press, not-for-profit publishing, publishing history, science journal history. INTRODUCTION founders and their vision of modern botanical science to prosper, and describes a notable clash of personalities that almost By August 2012, the Annals of Botany had been published brought the Journal down after only 12 years. In addition, ac- without a break for 125 years. In that time it has become not counts are given of the creation of the ‘Annals of Botany only the world’s oldest continuously published botanical title Company’, the effects on the Journal of the First World War but one that has retained a high international standing despite and its aftermath, and how the Journal’s managers looked to the emergence of numerous popular and well-run competitors. the future by planning a ‘New Series’ starting 50 years after its The present article is the first of two that, together, look back foundation. over the Journal’s long history. The present article considers how the Annals of Botany first came into being in 1887 and the evolution of its editorship and SOURCES OF INFORMATION management practices over the 50 years to 1937. These devel- opments are described in terms of the people involved, how Two previously published short accounts and one more exten- they organized the starting of the Journal and how they ran and sive account of the inception of the Annals of Botany (Farmer, financed it on a not-for-profit basis. The article pays particular 1923, 1937; Wilson, 1978) have been consulted during the writ- attention to the lives of the nine remarkable and mostly rather ing. These earlier accounts are based on a remarkable collection grand individuals who founded the Journal and who, for the of >170 handwritten Minutes, letters and related documents most part, came from privileged backgrounds. Despite being a covering the years 1885–1897. The letters are all addressed to youthful group (all but one were under 40), most were already the founding editor Sir Isaac Bayley Balfour and it is therefore establishment figures by 1887, e.g. Fellows of the Royal Society likely that it was Balfour who had sufficient sense of history in (FRS) or directors/professors of prestigious establishments, the making to preserve these documents. By 1923, the collec- while the others were soon to become so. The present article tion had already been carefully examined by one of the editors, also outlines the academic environment which allowed the Sir John Bretland Farmer. His insightful summary of the Mike Jackson joined the Editorial Board of the Annals of Botany in 1988. He was the Journal’s Chief Editor from 1996 to 2007 and worked to estab- lish the online open-access journal AoB PLANTS, becoming its first Chief Editor in 2009. VC The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: [email protected] 2 Jackson — History of Annals of Botany. Part 1: the first 50 years contents is contained in an obituary for Balfour (Farmer, 1923). Minute Book!’. However, thanks to the perspicacious Balfour, It is, however, odd that 13 years later, at the Journal’s 1936 to efficient office management at the Clarendon Press and to Annual Meeting, Farmer is reported as being unable to write a a large dose of undeserved serendipity, a wealth of original historical account of the Annals because he ‘had not the requi- documentation about the founding and subsequent development site information’. The best Farmer could then manage was a of the Annals of Botany has emerged. Arrangements are in brief description of the origins of the Journal as part of his short hand for much of this material to be added to the existing Foreword to Volume 1 of the Annals of Botany New Series Annals of Botany archive at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (Farmer, 1937). In 1944, Balfour’s collection of early docu- for cataloguing and safe keeping. ments was deposited for safe keeping at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew by Vernon Herbert Blackman, the Journal’s lead editor at the time. It has sometimes been referred to, mis- BACKGROUND TO THE STARTING OF leadingly, as The First Minute Book. In 1967, its numerous THE ANNALS OF BOTANY individual items were ordered, numbered, mounted on card The year in which the Journal published its first issue (1887) and bound by archivists at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew as was Queen Victoria’s golden jubilee year, a highly propitious a single volume named ‘Annals of Botany Correspondence time to start a new and ambitious English language botanical 1885–1897’. Ironically, a subsequent cataloguing error made journal intent on publishing ‘original articles, reviews and locating this bound collection difficult for Karl Wilson, a for- progress reports, historical notices, short notes, letters and a mer Secretary and Treasurer to the Journal, who instigated a record of current literature’. The political and social circum- search in the 1970s (Wilson, 1978). Its re-discovery by V. T. H. stances that gave rise to the Annals of Botany can be linked to Parry, the Librarian and Archivist at Kew, then enabled Wilson wholesale reforms to British education begun in about 1870 to write the first thorough account of the conception and birth (Haines, 1958) when shortcomings in Britain’s schools, univer- of the Annals of Botany (Wilson, 1978). The present article is sities and related institutions were being blamed for a loss of in- built upon Wilson’s firm foundation. dustrial and technical competiveness compared with France and In 1999, a more comprehensive collection of letters, financial Germany. The reforms were directed by a royal commission accounts and overlapping sets of unbound Minutes covering the chaired by the Duke of Devonshire (the so-called Devonshire years 1888–1911 were discovered during an office clearout at Commission) and included Thomas Henry Huxley (a President University College, University of London and passed to me by of the Royal Society in the 1870s and known famously as Professor J. H. A. Nugent. Some of this material is thought Darwin’s Bulldog) whose more direct influence on the founders to comprise documents assembled by the Clarendon Press (an of the Annals of Botany is mentioned later. The Devonshire imprint of Oxford University Press and the first publisher of the Commission planned advanced training and research centres Annals of Botany) and sent to Dukinfield Henry Scott (the then similar to those of German universities (Haines, 1958)withan Chairman) in 1922. We have the covering letter from The emphasis on laboratory instruction and research instead of Secretary of the Clarendon Press (R. W. Chapman) and also learning mainly from books (often ones translated from the Scott’s thank you letter dated 4 December 1922 confirming German). Subsequent funding, both private and public, helped receipt of the papers. How they subsequently came to be at to create or strengthen numerous academic institutions, some of University College and then abandoned there is not known. which provided education and career opportunities for the plant The person responsible may have been Francis Wall Oliver, scientists who started the Annals of Botany. These reforms also amemberoftheAnnals of Botany’s committee from 1904 and increased the number of professional botanists and botanically the Quain Professor of Botany at University College between knowledgeable teachers and thus the number of potential con- 1890 and 1925.
Recommended publications
  • Conceptual Barriers to Progress Within Evolutionary Biology
    Found Sci (2009) 14:195–216 DOI 10.1007/s10699-008-9153-8 Conceptual Barriers to Progress Within Evolutionary Biology Kevin N. Laland · John Odling-Smee · Marcus W. Feldman · Jeremy Kendal Published online: 26 November 2008 © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008 Abstract In spite of its success, Neo-Darwinism is faced with major conceptual barriers to further progress, deriving directly from its metaphysical foundations. Most importantly, neo- Darwinism fails to recognize a fundamental cause of evolutionary change, “niche construc- tion”. This failure restricts the generality of evolutionary theory, and introduces inaccuracies. It also hinders the integration of evolutionary biology with neighbouring disciplines, includ- ing ecosystem ecology, developmental biology, and the human sciences. Ecology is forced to become a divided discipline, developmental biology is stubbornly difficult to reconcile with evolutionary theory, and the majority of biologists and social scientists are still unhappy with evolutionary accounts of human behaviour. The incorporation of niche construction as both a cause and a product of evolution removes these disciplinary boundaries while greatly generalizing the explanatory power of evolutionary theory. Keywords Niche construction · Evolutionary biology · Ecological inheritance · Ecosystem ecology · Developmental biology 1 Introduction On the face of it, evolutionary biology is a thriving discipline: It is built on the solid theoret- ical foundations of mathematical population biology; it has a rich and productive empirical K. N. Laland (B) School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, Bute Building, Queens Terrace, St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9TS, UK e-mail: [email protected] J. Odling-Smee Mansfield College, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TF, UK M.
    [Show full text]
  • Jesse D. Hollister
    Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Stony Brook University [email protected] Jesse D. Hollister Education 2009 Ph.D. Biological Sciences, University of California, Irvine 2003 B.A. Biology, Sonoma State University Professional Experience Jan. 2015- Assistant Professor, Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Stony Brook University 2012-2014 Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto. Advisors: Stephen Wright, Marc Johnson 2009-2011 Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University. Advisor: Kirsten Bomblies Publications 13. Hollister, J.D. 2014. Polyploidy: adaptation to the genomic environment. New Phytologist. DOI: 10.1111/nph.12942 12. Hough, J., J.D. Hollister, W. Wang, S.C.H. Barrett, and S.I Wright. 2014. Genetic degeneration of old and young Y chromosomes in the flowering plant Rumex hastatulus. PNAS. 111(21): 7713-7718. 11. Hollister, J.D. 2014. Genomic variation in Arabidopsis: tools and insights from next generation sequencing. Chromosome Research. 1-13. 10. Yant, L. *, J.D. Hollister*, K. Wright, B. Arnold, J. Higgins, F. C. Franklin, and K. Bomblies. 2013. Meiotic adaptation to a genome-doubled state in Arabidopsis arenosa. Curr. Biol. 23(21): R961-63 *Co-first Authors 9. Hollister, J.D., B. Arnold, E. Svedin, K. Xue, B. Dilkes, and K. Bomblies. 2012. Genetic adaptation associated with genome doubling in autotetraploid Arabidopsis arenosa. PLoS Genet. 8(12), e1003093 8. B.C. Hunter, J. D. Hollister, and K. Bomblies. 2012. Epigenetic inheritance: what news for evolution? Curr. Biol. 22(2): R54-55. 7. Hollister, J.D., L. Smith, Y. Guo, F. Ott, D. Weigel, and B.
    [Show full text]
  • Age and Area Cambjiidge University Press C
    NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES S02842957 This book is due on the date indicated unless recalled by the Libraries. Books not returned on time are subject to replacement charges. Borrowers may access their library accounts at: http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/ads/borrow.html AGE AND AREA CAMBJIIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS C. F. CLAY, Manager LONDON : FETTER LANE, E.G. 4 LONDON : H. K. LEWIS AND CO.. Ltd., 136, Gower Street, AV.C. I LONDON: WHELDON AND WESLEY. Ltd.. 28. Essex Street, Strand. W.C. 2 NEW YORK: THE MACMILLANCO. BOMBAY \ CALCUTTA \ MACMILLAN ANDCO.. Ltd. MADRAS J TORONTO : THE MACMH,LAN CO. OF CANADA, Ltd. TOKYO : MARUZEN-KABUSHIKI-KAISHA ALL BIGHTS KESER\-ED AGE AND AREA A STUDY IN GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION AND ORIGIN OF SPECIES BY J. C. WILLIS M.A., Sc.D., Hon. ScD. (Harvard), F.R.S. European Correspondent, late Director, Botanic Gardens, Rio de Janeiro WITH CHAPTERS BY HUGO DE VRIES, F.M.R.S. H. B. GUPPY, M.B., F.R.S. Mrs E. M. REID, B.Sc, F.L.S. JAMES SMALL, D.Sc, F.L.S. [These authors are not committed, by writing these chapters, to the support of all the doctrines here advanced] CAMBRIDGE AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS 1922 ^ ,% ^y^h a 4 PREFACE Some thirty years ago, a pupil of the strictest school of natural selection, and enthusiastic in my belief in its principles, I set out upon a course of independent observation of nature. Ten years of such work convinced me that a simpler explanation of phenomena was always to be found, and one that seemed more in accordance with the facts; and I endeavoured—with what success this book will show—to free myself from the trammels of the natural selection theory, and to work as if I had found myself in another planet where scientific investigation was just begin- ning.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reginald Farrer Collection
    Catalogue of the Reginald J. Farrer Collection at the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh GB 235 RJF Title: The Reginald Farrer Collection Dates of Creation: 1880 – present Name of Creator: Reginald Farrer (1880-1920), Farrer family and Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, et al. Administrative / Biographical History: Reginald John Farrer, traveller, plant collector, plantsman and writer, was born on the 17th February, 1880 at 3 Spanish Place, London, the eldest of two boys born to James Anson Farrer (1849-1925) and Elizabeth Georgina Ann, nee Reynell-Pack. Farrer was born with a cleft palate and hare lip, the operation scars to correct this he later covered up with a thick moustache. Having to endure many childhood operations he was educated at home and also at Newnham Rectory. Spending much time by himself, Farrer enjoyed studying the flora in the hills surrounding his family’s Yorkshire estate, Ingleborough in Clapham, which his father inherited in 1889. At the age of fourteen, Farrer redesigned its alpine garden. In 1898 he attended Balliol College in Oxford, graduating in 1902. While there he helped H.J. Bidder construct the popular rock garden at St John’s College. Family holidays were often spent in Europe, but in 1903 Farrer went on his first long journey to Beijing / Peking, briefly visiting Korea before spending around 8 months in Japan. His first book, The Garden of Asia (1904) describes this stay. At this time, Farrer’s plant and gardening interests were overtaken by his ambition to become a novelist, poet and playwright. Unfortunately, most of this work was not well regarded and is now forgotten.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Arthur Hill, KCMG
    No. 3760, NovEMBER 22, 1941' NATURE 619 OBITUARIES Sir Arthur Hill, K.C.M.G., F.R.S. the time of his death an entirely new revision of the HE tragic death of Sir Arthur Hill, director of genus Nototriche to be illustrated by an elaborate T the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, in a riding series of drawings. accident on November 3, is not only a disaster for the The appointment to Kew as assistant director Gardens, but also a great loss to the many societies, 1mder Sir David Prain we,s made in 1907. Hill was institutions and Government departments of which allotted a number of routine duties including the he was the chief representative of official botany for editorship of the Kew Bulletin, but in spite of these Great Britain. The twenty-odd years during which he was able to continue research and he published he was director saw a tremendous advance in the several taxonomic revisions and other papers. He progress of botanical science in all its branches, and took a share in the preparation of the great African it was ·natural that Kew should play a prominent part Floras published from Kew, namely "The Flora in many of the activities characteristic of this period. Capensis" and "The Flora of Tropical Africa". For Arthur William Hill was born on October ll, both of these he elaborated the difficult family 187 5, and was the only son of Daniel Hill, of Watford. Santalacere, which entailed careful dissection of small H e was educated at Marlborough and at King's and inconspicuous flowers, and for "The Flora College, Cambridge, where h e obtained a first class Capensis" he prepared (in collaboration with Pra.in) in both Part I and Part II of the Natural Sciences the article on the Gentiana.cere.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial This Issue Contains a Profile of John Stevens Henslow, Darwin’S Cambridge Friend and Mentor (Page 4)
    THE LINNEAN 1 Editorial This issue contains a profile of John Stevens Henslow, Darwin’s Cambridge friend and mentor (page 4). Henslow was not only responsible for Darwin’s appointment to HMS Beagle but also arranged to receive all tlie collected material shipped home to Cambridge. Moreover at the conclusion of the voyage he arranged for Darwin to be given a Treasury grant of &I,000 towards the publication of his zoological fiiidings. During the entire five years of the Beagle s voyage, Henslow corresponded with Darwin proffering advice and guidance and later publishing some of Darwin’s geological observations in the Cambridge Philosophical Society Proceedings.’ Darwin’s great debt of gratitude to Henslow is quite apparent from the tone of his letters to his old tutor: “I always like advice from you, and no one whom I have the luck to know is more capable of giving it than yourself. Recollect, when you write, that I am a sort ofprotkgge‘of yours, and that it is your bounden duty to lecture me.” (Devonport, Dec. 3 1831) “I will say farewell, till the day arrives when I shall see my Master in Natural History and can tell him how grateful I feel for his kindness and friendship.” (Sydney, Jan. 1836) And then when telling Henslow about his geological specimens: “My dear Henslow, I do long to see you, you have been the kindest friend to me that ever man possessed.” (Shrewsbury, Oct. 6 1836) The year after the Beagle ’s return Henslow was appointed rector of Hitcham, Suffolk (1837) and from that point onwards as Darwin noted: “he cared somewhat less about science and more for his parishioners.” Finally, in the last year of his life, Henslow came to the assistance of his student one last time by acting as Chairman of the 1860 British Association meeting at which Huxley (and Hooker and Lubbock) took up the cudgel on Darwin’s behalf.
    [Show full text]
  • Maura C. Flannery St
    Goethe and the Molecular Aesthetic Maura C. Flannery St. John’s University I argue here that Goethe’s “delicate empiricism” is not an alternative approach to science, but an approach that scientists use consistently, though they usually do not label it as such. I further contend that Goethe’s views are relevant to today’s science, specifically to work on the structure of macromolecules such as proteins. Using the work of Agnes Arber, a botanist and philosopher of science, I will show how her writings help to relate Goethe’s work to present-day issues of cogni- tion and perception. Many observers see Goethe’s “delicate empiricism” as an antidote to reductionism and to the strict separation of the objective and subjective so prevalent in science today. The argument is that there is a different way to do science, Goethe’s way, and it can achieve discoveries which would be impossible with more positivistic approaches. While I agree that Goethe’s method of doing science can be viewed in this light, I would like to take a different approach and use the writings of the plant morphologist Agnes Arber in the process since she worked in the Goethean tradition and en- larged upon it. I argue here that Goethe’s way of science is done by many, if not most scientists, that there is not a strict dichotomy between these two ways of doing science, but rather scientists move between the two approaches so frequently and the shift is so seamless that it is difficult for them to even realize that it is happening.
    [Show full text]
  • Flores Silvestres De Chile, Flores Del Norte Grande
    FLORES SILVESTRES DE CHILE FLORES DEL NORTE GRANDE FLORES SILVESTRES DE CHILE FLORES DEL NORTE GRANDE FELIPE ORREGO JOHN WATSON ANA R. FLORES GLORIA ROJAS w Jack Stern y Compañía ltda. Con la cooperación del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural w Vicepresidencia de Sustentabilidad de Compañía Minera Doña Inés de Collahuasi SCM s un honor para Compañía Minera Doña Inés de Collahuasi presentar este libro, resultado de una acuciosa investigación sobre la flora de nuestras regiones I de E Tarapacá, XV de Arica y Parinacota y II de Antofagasta. Este lugar, único en el mundo, con una variedad de climas que va desde la puna y el frío extremo en el alti- plano, al calor en la pampa, llegando al templado pero árido litoral, presenta una bio- diversidad botánica que ha deslumbrado a científicos y visitantes. Parte de esta riqueza del desierto más longevo del mundo se revela en estas páginas, gracias al equipo fotográfico de expertos que encontró nuevos registros de plantas así como potenciales nuevas especies, y plantas muy difíciles de observar, en su momento de plena floración y de reproducción. La belleza de nuestro desierto es única en el mundo. Su especial y delicado sistema, que puede ser vulnerado con facilidad por la intervención del hombre y el cambio climático, requiere que lo conozcamos, comprendamos y seamos responsables de su cuidado. Solo así podremos preservarlo para las generaciones venideras. Para Collahuasi es un privilegio poder contribuir, a través de la Ley de Donaciones Culturales y de la Corporación del Patrimonio Cultural, al conocimiento y difusión de este lugar único en el planeta, un verdadero tesoro de la biodiversidad, motivo de orgullo para todos los chilenos.
    [Show full text]
  • CAMBRIDGE LIBRARY COLLECTION Books of Enduring Scholarly Value
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-01320-8 - Monocotyledons: A Morphological Study Agnes Arber Frontmatter More information CAMBRIDGE LIBRARY COLLECTION Books of enduring scholarly value Life Sciences Until the nineteenth century, the various subjects now known as the life sciences were regarded either as arcane studies which had little impact on ordinary daily life, or as a genteel hobby for the leisured classes. The increasing academic rigour and systematisation brought to the study of botany, zoology and other disciplines, and their adoption in university curricula, are reflected in the books reissued in this series. Monocotyledons Agnes Arber (1879–1960) was a prominent British botanist specialising in plant morphology, who focused her research on the monocotyledon group of flowering plants. She was the first female botanist to be elected a Fellow of the Royal Society, in 1946. This volume, first published as part of the Cambridge Botanical Handbooks series in 1925, provides an anatomical and comparative study of the monocotyledon group of plants with an analysis of the methods and objects of studying plant morphology. At the time of publication, comparative anatomy and morphology were the centre of botanical investigation; however there were differences between British and continental biologists concerning the aims of morphological study. In the introduction to this volume Arber reconciled these views by describing a distinction between pure and applied morphology, interpreting the differences in monocotyledonous species in light of this. The book contains an extensive bibliography and 160 figures. © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-01320-8 - Monocotyledons: A Morphological Study Agnes Arber Frontmatter More information Cambridge University Press has long been a pioneer in the reissuing of out-of- print titles from its own backlist, producing digital reprints of books that are still sought after by scholars and students but could not be reprinted economically using traditional technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Character Description in Phylogenetic Analysis: Insights from Agnes Arber's Concept of the Plant
    Character Description in Phylogenetic Analysis: Insights from Agnes Arber's Concept of the Plant By: BRUCE K. KIRCHOFF Kirchoff, B. K. 2001. Character description in phylogenetic analysis: insights from Agnes Arber's concept of the plant. Annals of Botany 88: 1203-1214. Made available courtesy of Oxford University Press: http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/88/6/1203 ***Note: Figures may be missing from this format of the document Abstract: Throughout her work Agnes Arber argues for an inclusive, synthetic concept of the vascular plant as `consisting of a unification of every phase of its existence'. Her view of the leaf as a partial-shoot reflects this unification by relating the part (leaf) to the whole (shoot). According to Arber's view of the plant, the part can be fully understood only in the context of the whole. Morphological character description as it is currently practiced in systematics isin sharp contrast with this holistic view of plant structure. Systematic characters are removed from their context when they are described. This problem is greatest when characters are expressed verbally. Verbal descriptions convey little of the content of the character. A shift from verbal to visual charactersallows systematists to capture more information, including some of the context in which the character occurs. By using a photograph, the fringe on a labellum of Alpinia spp. (Zingiberaceae) can be viewed in the context of the labellum in a way that the word `fringe' cannot convey. The use of pictorial charactersalso allows reliable data storage and retrieval from databases, much as DNA sequences are currently being stored and retrieved.
    [Show full text]
  • Tansley Insight Rapid Evolution in Plant–Microbe Interactions – an Evolutionary Genomics Perspective
    Review Tansley insight Rapid evolution in plant–microbe interactions – an evolutionary genomics perspective Author for correspondence: Sophie de Vries1 , Eva H. Stukenbrock2,3 and Laura E. Rose1 Laura E. Rose 1 € € € Tel: +49 211 81 13406 Institute of Population Genetics, Heinrich Heine University Dusseldorf, Universitatsstraße 1 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany; Email: [email protected] 2Environmental Genomics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Pl€on, Germany; 3The Botanical Institute, Christian- Received: 6 May 2019 Albrechts University of Kiel, Am Botanischen Garden 9-11 24118, Kiel, Germany Accepted: 13 January 2020 Contents Summary 1256 VI. The role of reticulate evolution 1258 I. Introduction 1256 VII. Concluding comments 1260 II. Signatures of selection 1257 Acknowledgements 1260 III. Convergent evolution 1257 References 1261 IV. Cryptic genetic variation 1258 V. Evidence of host jumps 1258 Summary New Phytologist (2020) 226: 1256–1262 Access to greater genomic resolution through new sequencing technologies is transforming the doi: 10.1111/nph.16458 field of plant pathology. As scientists embrace these new methods, some overarching patterns and observations come into focus. Evolutionary genomic studies are used to determine not only Key words: co-evolution, convergent the origins of pathogen lineages and geographic patterns of genetic diversity, but also to discern evolution, crop protection, genetic variation, how natural selection structures genetic variation across the genome. With greater and greater natural selection, phytopathogens. resolution, we can now pinpoint the targets of selection on a large scale. At multiple levels, crypsis and convergent evolution are evident. Host jumps and shifts may be more pervasive than once believed, and hybridization and horizontal gene transfer (HGT) likely play important roles in the emergence of genetic novelty.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Phylogenetics to Detect Pollinatormediated Floral Evolution
    New Review Phytologist Research review Using phylogenetics to detect pollinator-mediated floral evolution Author for correspondence: Stacey DeWitt Smith Stacey DeWitt Smith Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA Tel: +1 919 684 3378 Email: [email protected] Received: 28 February 2010 Accepted: 6 April 2010 Summary New Phytologist (2010) 188: 354–363 The development of comparative phylogenetic methods has provided a powerful doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03292.x toolkit for addressing adaptive hypotheses, and researchers have begun to apply these methods to test the role of pollinators in floral evolution and diversification. Key words: ancestral state reconstruction, One approach is to reconstruct the history of both floral traits and pollination sys- diversification, floral evolution, phylogenetic tems to determine if floral trait change is spurred by shifts in pollinators. Looking generalized least squares, phylogenetics, across multiple shifts, it is also possible to test for significant correlations between pollination system, stochastic mapping, floral evolution and pollinators using parsimony, likelihood and Bayesian methods transition rate. for discrete characters or using statistical comparative methods for continuous characters. Evolutionary shifts in pollinators and floral traits may cause changes in diversification rates, and new methods are available for simultaneously studying character evolution and diversification rates. Relatively few studies have yet used formal comparative methods to elucidate how pollinators affect floral evolution across the phylogeny, and fruitful directions for future applications are discussed. consistent with the idea that these syndromes reflect floral Introduction adaptation (Stebbins, 1970; Fenster et al., 2004). These Comparative analysis has a long history in the study of comparative studies of floral morphology and pollination plant–pollinator interactions.
    [Show full text]