Workbook for Training in Adopting, Applying and Operating Environmentally Sound Technologies (Ests)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Workbook for Training in Adopting, Applying and Operating Environmentally Sound Technologies (Ests) WORKBOOK FOR TRAINING IN ADOPTING, APPLYING AND OPERATING ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND TECHNOLOGIES (ESTS) U Regional Workshop implemented 8-13 December 1997 in Perth, Australia by IJNEP TETC in collaboration with Murdoch University 'e 2 LJNEP International Environmental Technology Centre OsakaiShiga, 1998 IETC Report Series - Issue 6 ISBN 92-807-1478-0 Preface International Environmental Technology Centre (IETC) is a unit of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Its role is to promote the adoption and use of environmentally sound technologies (ESTs) for the management of urban and freshwater basin environmental issues in developing countries and economic transitioning countries. ESTs are recognised as critical to countries'success in achieving sustainable development. One of the Centre's activities is to enhance the capacity of the decisionlpolicy makers to make sensible decisions on technologies. Adopting, applying and operating ESTs are key issues to policy-making and technology choices/practices for integrated environmental management approaches. The regional workshop for AsialPacific on adopting, applying and promoting of environmentally sound technologies, organised by the IETC in collaboration with Murdoch University of Australia from 8 to 13 December at Perth, Australia, was a response to this need. It was a follow-up to the global workshop in Dresden, Germany, 1996 and brought together 30 participants from 19 countries. The program combined proactive sessions, exercises, small group works, and field trips to build individual and institutional capacities: it focussed on priority issues such as freshwater resources, water supply, technology transfer, waste management and city plarming. The training was targeted at the needs of national/local government, and civil-society decision-makers in the area of technology implementationlregulation, as well as at those with responsibilities involving environmental issues. This publication contains session outlines including presentations and reports, and information related to the workshop. As such it is a valuable source document for all who are involved in working towards sustainable development. JMrector December 1998 III TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface.................................................................III Table of Contents .................................................... .....V Introduction ............................................................VII Session Outlines Session 1: Lecture I: Sustainable Development and Technology Choice .................... 1 Session 2: Lecture II: An Introduction to Practical ESTs for Sustainable Development of Freshwater Resources ...................................... 7 Session 3: Reports from Delegates I: Mr. Pak Sokharavuth, Cambodia ........................... 22 Mr. E. Ratukalou, Fiji ................................... 26 Mr. C. D. Serra, French Polynesia ........................... 31 Mr. S.K.P.Parekh, India ................................... 33 Lecture III: Sustainable Water Technologies ................................ 43 Microbial Tests for Drinking Water Quality: On-Site Methods ..........46 Session 4: Field Visit: Chemistry Centre (WA) ............................. 55 Session 5: Industry Presentations I: Process and Pollution Control Pty Ltd......................... 60 BioMAX Pty Ltd ........................................ 66 Environmental Solutions International......................... 71 Session 6: Reports from Delegates II: Mr. Tun Than Tun, Myanmar............................... 86 Mr. R. Shrestha, Nepal.................................... 90 Ms Sereana Kubuabola, Fiji................................. 97 Lecture IV: Permaculture - A Sustainable Urban Agriculture .................... 99 Session 7/8: Field Visit: (1) Permaculture landscape at the Environmental Technology Centre (ETC) on campus, (2) Demonstration and discussion of technologies at the ETC ..................................... 103 Session 9: Lecture V: Needs and Conditions of Technology Transfer including Adopting, Applying and Operating ESTs: A Case Presentation and Group Discussion ..................... 107 Session 10: Presentation of UNEP IETC's Technology Information System ..... 151 Session 11: Reports from Delegates III: Ms A. Siapno, Philippines ................................ 154 Mr. Soo-Hyun Shin, Republic of Korea....................... 158 Mr. Jayasekara Jayasekar, Sri Lanka......................... 162 Lecture VI: Solid Waste Management - Technologies Options .................. 165 V Session 12: Field Visit: To landfill gas site .................................169 Session 13: Lecture VII: Applying Lifecycle Assessment to Waste Management in Asia 173 Session 14: Lecture VIII: Sustainable Development and the German Packaging Ordinance: ACase Study ............................................ 183 Session 15: Report from Delegates IV: Mr. Xiangyang Fang, The Peoples' Republic of China ........... 192 Mr. Paula Fokikovi Taufa, Tonga .......................... 199 Mr. Laavasa Malua, Western Samoa .......................... 03 Industry Presentations II: Western Wastewater Treatments Pty Ltd...................... 207 Ecomax Waste Management Systems Pty Ltd.................. 211 BSD Consultants ....................................... 222 Session 16: Report from Delegates V: Mr. I.M. Tamrakar, Nepal ................................ 228 Mr. A.A. Rahim, Bangladesh .............................. 231 Ms Suree Ummaralikit, Thailand ............................ 34 Mr. Qingci He, People's Republic of China ................... 237 Session 17: Lecture IX: From Symbolic Gesture to the Main Stream - Next Steps in Local Sustainability ........................................ 241 Session 18: Lecture X: Urban Growth Management, Sustainability and Ecological Imperatives for the 21st Century ............................... 259 Session 19: Training: Design and discussion of regional/national training programs ......... 267 Session 20: End of workshop evaluations, completing questionnaires and discussions ............................................... 85 Annexes Annex 1: Workshop Announcement....................................287 Annex 2: Program .................................................289 Annex 3: List of Delegates...........................................293 Annex 4: Summary of End-of-Workshop Evaluation .......................295 Annex 5: Evaluation Questionnaire Sheet................................309 Annex 6: Certificate Copy ...........................................313 Annex 7: List of Presenters .........................................314 VT Introduction This workshop was organised in Perth, Australia, from 8 to 13 December 1997 in collaboration with Murdoch University as part of TETC's capacity building activities on adopting, applying and operating Environmentally Sound Technologies (ESTs). It followed the global workshop held in Dresden, 2-10 September 1996. The workshop was regional, bringing together 30 participants from 19 countries in Asia and the Pacific region, all of whom eagerly met together in 19 sessions including four field trips. The sessions included 1) reports from delegates and industry presentations; 2) lectures and discussions on sustainable development and technology choices, fresh water resource, water supply, permaculture, technology transfer, solid waste, waste assessment, next steps in local sustainability, and urban management; 3) presentation on IETC's information system; and 4) training course design. VII SESSION 1 Lecture I: Sustainable Development and Technology Choice Dr. Kuruvilla Mathew and Martin Anda, Murdoch University Sustainable Development & Technology Choice Martin Anda, Kuruvilla Mathew & Michael Penberthy Institute for Environmental Science, Murdoch University Perth, Western Australia 1.1 The Concept of Sustainable Development In recent years, the pursuit of Sustainable Development has become a goal common to environmentalists, economists, development theorists, governments, and even many industrialists. This broad-based concern for both environment and development is part of a second wave of modern environmentalism (Beder 1993, p.xi). The first wave of modern environmentalism peaked in the 1960's and early 1970's. During these years a significant number of scientists began to express their concern for environmental issues such as the effects of pollution and the depletion of non-renewable natural resources. There was also a rapid increase in public concern for the welfare of the natural environment. Nature conservation organisations expanded their interests to include environmental issues, and new organisations and societies were formed specifically to draw attention to environmental issues (eg. Greenpeace formed in 1971). Environmentalism in the 1960's and early 1970's was different to environmentalism today in that it had very little support from mainstream economists and industrialists. It was also much more antagonistic towards industry, and the western capitalist ideal of pursuing never- ending economic growth. First wave environmentalists voiced concern that population growth and the growth of industry could not be sustained indefinitely. Many argued that a global ecological crisis was imminent, and the pursuit of economic and industrial development was held to be responsible (eg. Meadows et al. 1972). At the time, governments were reluctant to acknowledge the presence of global environmental problems, or to recognise the possibility of a global ecological crisis. However, many
Recommended publications
  • Path to Compliance Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (()IDDE) MS4: IDDE Agenda
    MS4: IDDE NPDES MS4 Permits Path to Compliance Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (()IDDE) MS4: IDDE Agenda • IDDE Basics • What is an Illicit Discharge? • Components of an Effective IDDE Program MS4: IDDE What i s an Illi cit Di sch arge? MS4: IDDE What is an Illicit Discharge? 140 CFR 122.26(b)(2) defines an illicit discharge as: • Any discharge to an MS4 that is not composed entirely of storm water, except allowable discharges pursuant to an NPDES permit, including those resulting from fire fighting activities. MS4: IDDE Illicit Discharge Quiz MS4: IDDE 1. Sanitary Sewer Backup MS4: IDDE 1. Sanitary Sewer Backup YES MS4: IDDE 2. Groundwater Seepage Into Road Drainage System MS4: IDDE 2. Groundwater Seepage Into Road Drainage System NO MS4: IDDE 3. Car Wash Wastewater MS4: IDDE 3. Car Wash Wastewater YES MS4: IDDE 4. Oil Disposal MS4: IDDE 4. Oil Disposal YES MS4: IDDE 5. Foundation Drain Discharge MS4: IDDE 5. Foundation Drain Discharge NO MS4: IDDE 6. Spill from Roadway Accident MS4: IDDE 6. Spill from Roadway Accident YES MS4: IDDE 7. Leaky Septic Tank MS4: IDDE 7. Leaky Septic Tank YES MS4: IDDE The Basics: Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination MS4: IDDE Federal regulations require municipalities designated to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit (Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit) to develop and implement a Stormwater Management Program (SWMP) addressing six (6) Minimum Control Measures (MCMs): 1. Public education and outreach 2. Public participation / involvement 3. Illicit discharge detection and elimination 4. Construction site runoff control 5. Post-construction runoff control 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Sanitary Sewer Master Plan
    The City and Borough of Sitka Municipal Sanitary Sewer Master Plan October 2012 Prepared by: G.V. Jones & Associates O’Neill Surveying & Engineering FCS Group Carson Dorn CITY AND BOROUGH OF SITKA MUNICIPAL SANITARY SEWER MASTER PLAN Prepared for: City and Borough of Sitka Department of Public Works 100 Lincoln Street Sitka, Alaska 99835 Prepared by: DOWL HKM 4041 B Street Anchorage, Alaska 99503 (907) 562-2000 W.O. 60854 October 2012 City and Borough of Sitka Sitka, Alaska Municipal Sanitary Sewer Master Plan October 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. I 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 1.1 Existing Conditions ...........................................................................................................1 2.0 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE ANALYSIS ...................................................................3 2.1 Background .......................................................................................................................3 2.2 Wastewater Treatment Facilities.......................................................................................5 2.2.1 Secondary Treatment Facilities...................................................................................5 2.2.2 Water Quality Standard Regulations for Discharge to Water .....................................6 2.2.3 Marine Water Designation
    [Show full text]
  • Up Flow Anaerobic Filter (UAF) Treatment of Rural Domestic Sewage at Different Psychrophilic and Mesophilic Temperatures
    2016 International Conference on Environment, Climate Change and Sustainable Development (ECCSD 2016) ISBN: 978-1-60595-358-8 Up Flow Anaerobic Filter (UAF) Treatment of Rural Domestic Sewage at Different Psychrophilic and Mesophilic Temperatures John Leju Celestino LADU 1,2 , Xi-wu LU 1,* and Zhong-zhao PING 1 1School of Energy and Environment, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210096, P. R. China 2College of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, Department of Environmental Studies, University of Juba, Republic of South Sudan *Corresponding author Keywords: Anaerobic filter, Pschrophilic, Mesophilic , Sewage, HRT. Abstract. This empirical research paper revealed the findings from the up flow anaerobic filter (UAF) treatment of rural domestic sewage at different pschrophilic and mesophilic temperature. The reactor was operated at specific HRT of 24, 48 and 72 hours. In the first 14 days of the start-up, the results obtained from the reactor revealed good removal efficiency. At the mesophilic temperature, average COD removal reached 82.0%; while at psychrophilic temperature the reactor attained 68.7%. From the overall results, UAF reactor managed under mesophilic condition disclosed higher COD removal efficiency as compared to psychrophilic temperature which is similar to values obtained in hot regions. Experimentally, up flow anaerobic filter reactor operated at mesophilic temperature is recommended for rural domestic sewage treatment at a specific HRT of 3 days. Introduction In recent years, gigantic urban areas are served more readily than the medium and small city areas or rural communities in domestic sewage treatment. Since the population density is less in rural areas as compared with big urban cities, a small-scale dispersed up flow anaerobic (UAF) treatment system is opted to be the best option.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 15.2 Outfall Study
    Appendix 15.2 Outfall Study Irish Water Arklow Wastewater Treatment Plant Project EIA Report Issue | September 2018 | Arup \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\DUBLIN\JOBS\247000\247825-00\4. INTERNAL\4-03 DESIGN\4-03-02 CONSULTING\EIA REPORT\VOLUME 4 - APPENDICES\CHAPTER 15\APPENDIX 15.2 OUTFALL STUDY.DOCX Document Ref. No. 1207/5/17F Final Report Arklow WWTP Investigation of the Impact of Treated Wastewater Discharges to the Irish Sea Consulting Engineers: Arup 50 Ringsend Road, Dublin 4 Prepared by: Irish Hydrodata Limited Ballygarvan Cork Ph. 021-4311255 e-mail: [email protected] 20th August 2018 Arklow WWTP Marine Outfall Study FINAL Report CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1.1 Background Information 1.2 Study Brief 1.3 Regulatory Framework 1.4 Summary of Study Works 2. Area Characteristics 2.1 Coastal Bathymetry 2.2 Tidal Levels 2.3 Coastal Oceanography 2.4 Avoca River 3. Analysis Approach 3.1 Methods 3.2 Applicable Water Quality Standards 3.3 Background Coastal Water Quality 3.4 Proposed Outfall Location 3.5 4. Marine Outfall Simulations 4.1 Initial Dilutions at Outfall Discharge Point 4.2 Water Circulation Modelling 4.3 Contaminant Dispersion Simulations a. Simulation of the Existing Scenario b. Simulation of Proposed 900m Outfall c. Simulation of Storm Water Overflow 5. Conclusions Revision History Note Date 1207/1/15D Draft issued to BL-PHMcC for comment 5/4/15 1207/2/15P Preliminary report issued 15/4/15 1207/3/17D Draft report for marine outfall 15/2/17 1207/4/17D Revised draft report for marine outfall 30/11/17 1207/5/18F Final report for marine outfall 20/08/18 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Event Industry Professionals of New York City
    Last Modified on 5/28/2020 Authored by: Private Event Industry Professionals of New York City 1 This is a working document and not intended for official use. Table of Contents Objective Page 3 Guest Experience Page 4 Guest Arrival to Venue Page 4 Check In/Registration Process Page 4 Coat Check Page 5 Elevators to Event Space Page 6 Stairs to Event Space Page 6 Restrooms Page 6 Guest Departure Page 7 Prior to Arrival – Venue Preparation Page 7 Culinary/Food & Beverage Services Page 8 Objectives Page 8 Cocktail Reception Page 8 Plated Events Page 9 Social Events Page 9 Conferences Page 10 Sanitization & Cleaning Page 11 Objectives Page 11 Employee Health Page 11 Physical Distancing Page 12 Physical Hygiene and PPE Page 12 Contact Surfaces and Sanitization Procedures Page 13 Definitions Page 14 Employee Relations Page 14 Creative Partners Page 16 Objectives Page 16 All Creative Partners Page 16 Audio Visual and Technology Services Page 16 Caterers Page 17 Design & Décor Page 17 Entertainment Page 17 Parking Page 17 Photographers and Videographers Page 17 Rentals Page 17 Health Certification Form Page 18 Participants Page 19 Creative Partners and Peer Review Page 20 2 This is a working document and not intended for official use. Objective Private Events are the lifeblood of New York City and an engine of prosperity for the city and state. Without private and public events, our cultural, political, economic, and physical landscapes have been dramatically altered. Groups gathering for a common purpose, whether it be celebrating a milestone event, supporting the fundraising efforts of a local hospital, a large scale political rally for elected officials or participating in a company wide sales meeting not only help us memorialize our most special occasions, but also foster the community dynamic that is so distinctive in New York City.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. EPA, Pesticide Product Label, MAQUAT 10, 08/08/2008
    UNiTED ST.c~S ENVIRONMENTA.L'PROTECTI9NAGC1V [o3J-Cf -63' ~/g-'fcH;oe Ms. Elizabeth Tannehill Mason Chemical Company .r~~---~ .. 721 W. Algonquin Road ",'". 'I' ~1 , ,r: Arlington Heights, IL 60005 AUG 8 200a Subject: Maquat 10 EPA Registration No.: 10324-63 Amendment Date: March 19,2008 EP A Receipt Date: March 28, 2008 Dear Ms. Tannehill, The following amendment, submitted in connection With registration under section 3(c)(7)(A) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and.Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), as amended, is 'acceptable subject to the conditions listed below: • Addition of public health organisms • Addition of directions for use and marketing claims • ,Acceptable Data Correct your data matrix to indicate the correct MRIDs: Porcine Rotavinis: 45171410 and Porcine Respiratory and Reproductive Syndrome: 45171409. Community Associated Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Submitted study,.MRID473868-01 Acceptable, 625 ppm active in 5% . soil for 10 minutes Avian Influenza A (H5Nl) virus Submitted study, MRID 473868-02 Acceptable, 625 ppm active in 5% soil for 10 minutes Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 1 Submitted study, MRID 47386g~03 Acceptable, 625 ppm active in 5% soil for 2 minutes cONcuRReNces.' " . .. SYMBOL ••• J§l~.e ...................... _.~ ................ .. 0.............. ·o ••• _~ ......~....... .. .~O... ...• ....... .. .... 00"' ......... 0... ..0 .• 00." ...... SURNAME" -.;. ~ . DA1"E .; ••• ~J;j6~ .......... ~ ........... ~ .............. •••••••••••••••• ~~ •.•••• ~.......... ••••••••••••••••• • .............. _ ••••• ~ •••••• o ••••• ...... OFfiCIAL fiLE COpy EPA Form 1320-1A (1190) P,illud 011 Re~/ed Pa~ UNITED ST[~S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECT'ION AGC~CY Conditions Revise the label as follows: 1) Delete the following organism from the "Food Contact SanitiZing Performance" section on pages three and twelve: Clostridium perfringens-vegetative. The Agency is not longer accepting claims of effectiveness against the vegetative form of this organism.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Fixtures, Faucets and Fixture Fittings
    Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen CHAPTER 4 FIXTURES, FAUCETS AND FIXTURE FITTINGS SECTION 401 402.2 Materials for specialty fixtures. Materials for specialty GENERAL fixtures not otherwise covered in this code shall be of stainless 401.1 Scope. This chapter shall govern the materials, design steel, soapstone, chemical stoneware or plastic, or shall be and installation of plumbing fixtures, faucets and fixture fit- lined with lead, copper-base alloy, nickel-copper alloy, corro- tings in accordance with the type of occupancy, and shall pro- sion-resistant steel or other material especially suited to the vide for the minimum number of fixtures for various types of application for which the fixture is intended. occupancies. 402.3 Sheet copper. Sheet copper for general applications 401.2 Prohibited fixtures and connections. Water closets shall conform to ASTM B 152 and shall not weigh less than 12 having a concealed trap seal or an unventilated space or having ounces per square foot (3.7 kg/m2). walls that are not thoroughly washed at each discharge in 402.4 Sheet lead. Sheet lead for pans shall not weigh less than accordance with ASME A112.19.2M shall be prohibited. Any 4 pounds per square foot (19.5 kg/m2) coated with an asphalt water closet that permits siphonage of the contents of the bowl paint or other approved coating. back into the tank shall be prohibited. Trough urinals shall be prohibited. 401.3 Water conservation. The maximum water flow rates SECTION 403 and flush volume for plumbing fixtures and fixture fittings MINIMUM PLUMBING FACILITIES shall comply with Section 604.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Anaerobic Treatment of Municipal Wastewater
    November 1984 ^ Env. Eng. Report No. 76-83-7 Anaerobic Treatment of Municipal Wastewater Michael S. Switzenbaum Associate Professor of Civil Engineering Kevin C. Sheehan Research Engineer and Robert F. Mickey Graduate Research Assistant The research upon which this report is based was supported by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, Division of Water Pollution Control, Contract No. 80-32. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST, MASSACHUSETTS 01003 November, 1981) Env. Eng. Report No. 76-83-7 Technical Report Anaerobic Treatment of Municipal Wastewater by Michael S. Switzenbaum Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering Kevin C. Sheehan Research Engineer and Robert F. Hickey Graduate Research Assistant Department of Civil Engineering Environmental Engineering Program University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA 01003 Submitted to: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering Division of Water Pollution Control S. Russell Sylva, Commissioner Thomas C. McMahon, Director November 1984 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study was supported by Research and Demonstration Programs from the Massachusetts Division of Water Pollution Control (Project Number 80-32). The authors would like to thank MDWPC for their support. In addition, the authors would like to thank Ecolotrol, Inc., for lending the pilot reactor system used in this study. Thanks are also extended to Ms. Candy Balmer, Messrs. Kurt Kallmeyer, Kevin Scheuer, and Michael Shapiro, graduate students in the Environmental Engineering Program at UMASS/Amherst for their assistance in the operation and analysis of the pilot reactor. In addition, thanks are extended to Mr. Stephen Plotkin, who was instrumental in setting up this project. Finally, special thanks are extended to Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 the Robo-Toilet Revolution the Actress and the Gorilla
    George, Rose, 2014, The Big Necessity: The Unmentionable World of Human Waste and Why It Matters (pp. 39-64). Henry Holt and Co.. Kindle Edition. 2 THE ROBO-TOILET REVOLUTION THE ACTRESS AND THE GORILLA The flush toilet is a curious object. It is the default method of excreta disposal in most of the industrialized, technologically advanced world. It was invented either five hundred or two thousand years ago, depending on opinion. Yet in its essential workings, this everyday banal object hasn’t changed much since Sir John Harington, godson of Queen Elizabeth I, thought his godmother might like something that flushed away her excreta, and devised the Ajax, a play on the Elizabethan word jakes, meaning privy. The greatest improvements to date were made in England in the later years of the eighteenth century and the early years of the next by the trio of Alexander Cumming (who invented a valve mechanism), Joseph Bramah (a Yorkshireman who improved on Cumming’s valve and made the best lavatories to be had for the next century), and Thomas Crapper (another Yorkshireman who did not invent the toilet but improved its parts). In engineering terms, the best invention was the siphonic flush, which pulls the water out of the bowl and into the pipe. For the user, the S-bend was the godsend, because the water that rested in the bend created a seal that prevented odor from emerging from the pipe. At the height of Victorian invention, when toilets were their most ornate and decorated with the prettiest pottery, patents for siphonic flushes, for example, were being requested at the rate of two dozen or so a year.
    [Show full text]
  • Anaerobic Treatment of Domestic Sewage In
    Anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewater in subtropical regions Lucas Seghezzo Promotor: Prof. dr. ir. Gatze Lettinga, Hoogleraar in de anaërobe zuiveringstechnologie en hergebruik van afvalstoffen Co-promotoren: Dr. ir. Grietje Zeeman, Universitair docent bij de sectie Milieutechnologie Dr. Carlos Mario Cuevas, Universidad Nacional de Salta, Argentina Samenstelling promotiecommissie: Prof. dr. Henk Folmer (Wageningen Universiteit) Dr. ir. Ronald Mulder (Paques B.V., Nederland) Dr. ir. Bas van Vliet (Wageningen Universiteit) Prof. dr. Fernando Fernández-Polanco (Universidad de Valladolid, España) Dit onderzoek is uitgevoerd binnen de onderzoekschool WIMEK Anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewater in subtropical regions Lucas Seghezzo Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor op gezag van de rector magnificus van Wageningen Universiteit, prof. dr. ir. L. Speelman, in het openbaar te verdedigen op woensdag 26 mei 2004 des namiddags te vier uur in de Aula. CIP – DATA KONINKLIJKE BIBLIOTHEEK, DEN HAAG Author: Seghezzo, L. Title: Anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewater in subtropical regions Thesis Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands – with references – with summaries in English, Dutch, and Spanish. Publication year: 2004 ISBN: 90-8504-029-9 Subject headings: anaerobic treatment; domestic wastewater; sewage; UASB reactors; subtropical regions; sustainability assessment; sustainable development. Para Adriana, Natalia y Mateo “...que hay algunos que se cansan en saber y averiguar cosas que, una vez sabidas y averiguadas, no importan un ardite al entendimiento ni a la memoria...” (... because there are people who strive to know and find out things which, once known and found out, are not worth a straw to neither knowledge nor memory...) Don Quijote de la Mancha FOREWORD This thesis ends an era in my life and will hopefully open the doors of my future career.
    [Show full text]
  • Reaching the Last Mile Innovative Business Models for Inclusive Development Public Disclosure Authorized Editors Elaine Tinsley and Natalia Agapitova
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Reaching the Last Mile Innovative Business Models for Inclusive Development Public Disclosure Authorized Editors Elaine Tinsley and Natalia Agapitova Reaching the Last Mile Social Enterprise Business Models for Inclusive Development Editors Elaine Tinsley and Natalia Agapitova © Copyright March 2018 The World Bank 1818 H Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20433 All rights reserved Photos: cover-bottom middle (Anvar Ilyasov/World Bank); p. 4, cover-top middle (AishaFaquir/ World Bank); p. 17 (egwestcentre.com); p. 32 (Text2Teach); p. 34, cover-bottom left (Jonathan Ernst/World Bank); p. 70 (ABBAS Farzami-Runi Consultancy/World Bank); p. 71 (Huong Lan Vu/World Bank); p. 86 (Trevor Samson/World Bank); p. 87 (Merck for Mothers); p. 100 (Arogya Triage@Home); p. 103, 182 (Living Goods); p. 121 (thebetterindia.com); p. 134 (LV Prasad Eye Institute); p. 137 (salaUno); p. 148 (Dominic Chavez/World Bank); p. 149 (AFRIpads); p. 163 (Jayashree Industries); p. 167 (Elmvh/Wikimedia Commons); p. 185 (ABN AMRO); p. 188 (Dana Smillie/World Bank); p. 189 (www.thinkindia.net.in); p. 200 (Mobisol); p. 204 (Onergy India); p. 217 (Devergy); p. 222, cover-top left (Graham Crouch/ World Bank); p. 223 (Allison Kweseli/World Bank); pp. 225, 238 (Ghana Wash Project); pp. 235, 265 (Safe Water Network India); p. 240, cover-bottom right (Curt Carnemark/ World Bank); pp. 241, 255 (Sanergy); p. 252 (Clean Team Ghana); p. 258 (Fresh Life); p. 259 (Almin Zrno/World Bank); p. 261 (WeCyclers); p. 286 (Farhana Asnap/World Bank); p. 287 (Simgas); p. 314 (Peter Kapuscinski/World Bank); p.
    [Show full text]
  • Biomass Program Perspectives on Anaerobic Digestion and Fuel Cell Integration at Biorefineries
    Biomass Program Perspectives on Anaerobic Digestion and Fuel Cell Integration at Biorefineries Biogas and Fuel Cell Brian Duff Workshop DOE Biomass Program NREL June 11,2012 1 | Biomass Program eere.energy.gov Outline • The Importance of Anaerobic Digestion for Fuels, Products, and Power • Biomass Program Perspective • The Potential for Biogas/Fuel Cell Integration at Biorefineries o Retrofit Applications for 1st-Generation Biofuels Plants o Integration Opportunities in Advance Biofuel Production • Potential for EERE Multi-Program Joint Solicitation 2 | Biomass Program eere.energy.gov Anaerobic Digestion: An Underappreciated and Underutilized Conversion Pathway for Biofuels, Bioproducts, and Bioenergy 3 | Biomass Program eere.energy.gov Anaerobic Digestion • Microbial bioconversion process generates methane • Emerging global technology • Has a “Bad Rep” in the US from numerous failed applications: still needs RD&D for widespread acceptance and commercialization • Reduces GHG emissions (22:1 vs. CO2) • Dependent on sales to grid like other distributed energy techs • Lack of national feed-in tariff retarding deployment • Lack of process reliability retarding financing and deployment 4 | Biomass Program eere.energy.gov Anaerobic Digestion Organic Recycling for Renewable Energy AD takes waste organic feedstocks… Into Renewable Energy… Municipal Operations Industrial And Recycles the Organics Electricity Operations Steam Institutions Correctional Organic Recycling Heat Homes and Renewable Pipeline Energy Facility Biogas Injection Restaurants
    [Show full text]