DOCSLIB.ORG

Reproduce Locally

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reproduce Locally 201500214 REPRODUCE LOCALLY. Include form number and date on all reproductions Form Approved - OMB No. 0581-0055 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE The following statements are made in accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a) and AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY - PLANT VARIETY PROTECTION OFFICE Application is required in order to determine if a plant variety protection certificate is to be issued APPLICATION FOR PLANT VARIETY PROTECTION CERTIFICATE (7 U.S.C. 2421). Information is held confidential until certificate is issued (7 U.S.C. 2426). (Instructions and information collection burden statement on reverse) 1. NAME OF OWNER 2. TEMPORARY DESIGNATION OR EXPERIMENTAL NAME 3. VARIETY NAME 4. ADDRESS (Street and No., or R.F.D. No., City, State, and ZIP Code, and Country) 5. TELEPHONE (include area code) FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PVPO NUMBER 6. FAX (include area code) 201500214 FILING DATE 7. IF THE OWNER NAMED IS NOT A "PERSON", GIVE FORM OF 8. IF INCORPORATED, GIVE STATE OF 9. DATE OF INCORPORATION ORGANIZATION (corporation, partnership, association, etc.) INCORPORATION February 6, 2015 Unofficial Copy 10. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER REPRESENTATIVE(S) TO SERVE IN THIS 11. TELEPHONE (Include area code) F FILING AND EXAMINATION FEES: APPLICATION. (First person listed will receive all papers) E $ E 4382.00 S DATE 2/6/2015 R 12. FAX (Include area code) E CERTIFICATION FEE: $ C‘ D DATE 13. E-MAIL 14. CROP KIND (Common Name) 15. GENUS AND SPECIES NAME OF CROP 16. FAMILY NAME (Botanical) 17. IS THE VARIETY A FIRST GENERATION HYBRID? 18. DOES THE VARIETY CONTAIN ANY TRANSGENES? (OPTIONAL) 20. DOES THE OWNER SPECIFY THAT SEED OF THIS VARIETY BE SOLD ONLY AS A CLASS OF CERTIFIED □ YES □ NO □ YES □ NO SEED? (See Section 83(a) of the Plant Variety Protection Act) IF YES, PLEASE GIVE THE ASSIGNED USDA-APHIS REFERENCE NUMBER FOR THE APPROVED PETITION TO DEREGULATE THE □ YES (If "yes", answer items 21 and 22 below) GENETICALLY MODIFIED PLANT FOR COMMERCIALIZATION. □ NO (If "no", go to item 23) □ UNDECIDED 19. CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX FOR EACH ATTACHMENT SUBMITTED 21. DOES THE OWNER SPECIFY THAT SEED OF THIS VARIETY BE LIMITED AS TO (Follow instructions on reverse) NUMBER OF CLASSES? a. □ Exhibit A. Origin and Breeding History of the Variety □ YES □ NO b. □ Exhibit B. Statement of Distinctness IF YES, WHICH CLASSES? □ FOUNDATION □ REGISTERED □ CERTIFIED 22. DOES THE OWNER SPECIFY THAT SEED OF THIS VARIETY BE LIMITED AS TO NUMBER c. Exhibit C. Objective Description of Variety □ OF GENERATIONS? d. □ Exhibit D. Additional Description of the Variety (Optional) □ YES □ NO IF YES, SPECIFY THE NUMBER 1,2,3, etc. FOR EACH CLASS. e. □ Exhibit E. Statement of the Basis of the Owner's Ownership ____ FOUNDATION ____ REGISTERED ____ CERTIFIED f. □ Filing and Examination Fee ($4,382), make checks payable to "Treasurer of the United States" (Mail to the Plant Variety Protection Office) other methods of payment explained in the instructions (If additional explanation is necessary, please use the space indicated on the reverse.) 23. HAS THE VARIETY (INCLUDING ANY HARVESTED MATERIAL) OR A HYBRID PRODUCED 24. IS THE VARIETY OR ANY COMPONENT OF THE VARIETY PROTECTED BY INTELLECTUAL FROM THIS VARIETY BEEN SOLD, DISPOSED OF, TRANSFERRED, OR USED IN THE U. S. OR PROPERTY RIGHT (PLANT BREEDER'S RIGHT OR PATENT)? OTHER COUNTRIES? □ YES □ NO □ YES □ NO IF YES, YOU MUST PROVIDE THE DATE OF FIRST SALE, DISPOSITION, TRANSFER, OR USE FOR IF YES, PLEASE GIVE COUNTRY, DATE OF FILING OR ISSUANCE AND ASSIGNED EACH COUNTRY AND THE CIRCUMSTANCES. (Please use space indicated on reverse.) REFERENCE NUMBER. (Please use space indicated on reverse.) 25. The owners declare that a viable sample of basic seed will be furnished directly to an acceptable depository in support of the variety within three months of filing. Seed will be replenished upon request in accordance with such regulations as may be applicable. For a tuber propagated variety or vegetative propagated parent of the variety, a tissue culture or vegetative sample will be deposited in a public repository within three months of the date of the certificate fee request letter. These will be maintained for the duration of the certificate.” The undersigned owner(s) is (are) the owner(s) of this sexually reproduced or tuber propagated plant variety, and believe(s) that the variety is new, distinct, uniform, and stable as required in Section 42, and is entitled to protection under the provisions of Section 42 of the Plant Variety Protection Act. Owner(s) is (are) informed that false representation herein can jeopardize protection and result in penalties. SIGNATURE OF OWNER SIGNATURE OF OWNER NAME (Please print or type) NAME (Please print or type) CAPACITY OR TITLE DATE CAPACITY OR TITLE DATE ST - 470 (2012) designed by the Plant Variety Protection Office Page 6 of 10 201500214 Continuation Page from ST – 470 (Application for Plant Variety Protection Certificate) 22. CONTINUED FROM FRONT (Please provide a statement as to the limitation and sequence of generations that may be certified.) 23. CONTINUED FROM FRONT (Please provide the date of first sale, disposition, transfer, or use for each country and the circumstances, if the variety (including any harvested material) or a hybrid produced from this variety has been sold, disposed of, transferred, or used in the U.S. or other countries.) Unofficial Copy 24. CONTINUED FROM FRONT (Please give the country, date of filing or issuance, and assigned reference number, if the variety or any component of the variety is protected by intellectual property right (Plant Breeder's Right or Patent).) ST - 470 (2012) designed by the Plant Variety Protection Office Page 7 of 10 201500214 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE PVPO NUMBER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY - PLANT VARIETY PROTECTION OFFICE APPLICATION FOR PLANT VARIETY PROTECTION CERTIFICATE EXHIBIT A – ORIGIN AND BREEDING HISTORY ** Use additional pages as needed. 1. Name of Owner 2. Temporary Designation or Experimental Name 3. Variety Name 4. Describe the genealogy (back to and including public and commercial varieties, lines, or clones used) and the breeding method(s). ** Unofficial Copy 5. Give the details of subsequent stages of selection and multiplication. ** Year Detail of Stage Selection Criteria 6. Is the variety uniform? ____Yes _____No How did you test for uniformity? 7. Is the variety stable? _____ Yes _____ No How did you test for stability? Over how many generations? 8. Are genetic variants observed or expected during reproduction and multiplication? _____ Yes _____ No If yes, state how these variants may be identified, their type and frequency. ST - 470 (2012) designed by the Plant Variety Protection Office Page 8 of 10 201500214 EXHIBIT A Breeding History of the Zinnia marylandica Variety ‘PAS951086’ The zinnia species Zinnia marylandica is an amphidiploid produced by colchicine-induced doubling of sterile interspecific hybrids of Zinnia angustifolia and Zinnia elegans [see, for example, ‘Spooner, D.M., D.P. Stimart and T.H. Boyle. 1991. Zinnia marylandica (Asteraceae; Heliantheae), a new disease-resistant ornamental hybrid. Brittonia 43:7-10’]. Table 1. Breeding history. Unofficial Copy Year Description of events* Zinnia angustifolia variety ‘Classic Yellow’ was pollinated with Zinnia elegans variety ‘Starlight Salmon’ (W. Atlee Burpee Co.). Sterile plants of the interspecific 1983 F1 hybrid were treated with colchicine to produce fertile Zinnia marylandica seed. through Fertile seeds were sown and single plant selections were taken from two different 1986 progeny from that cross for 3 generations each to produce Zinnia marylandica lines Rose #918 and 5Z550. Selection criteria through 1990 are unknown as the W. Atlee Burpee Company owned and operated the breeding program during this time. 1986 Line Rose #918 and line 5Z550 were crossed to each other. Single plant selections through were taken among progeny of this cross for 4 generations to produce Zinnia 1990 marylandica line 7B13. 1991 The zinnia breeding program was inactive. All seed was cold stored during this through period. 1999 Seed of line ZB13 was taken from cold storage and renamed ZM00205. Single plant selections for large, yellow flowers and compact plants were taken for 5 further generations to produce Zinnia marylandica inbred ZM00205-1-1-1-1-2. Zinnia marylandica variety ‘Pinwheel Yellow’ (Ball Horticultural Company) was 2000 pollinated with Zinnia marylandica variety ‘Profusion White’ (PVP 9800350, through Sakata Seed Corporation) to produce hybrid 00762. Single plant selections for large, 2004 yellow flowers and compact plants were taken among progeny of this cross for 4 generations to yield inbred 00762-2-2-1-1. In 2004 Zinnia marylandica inbred ZM00205-1-1-1-1-2 was pollinated with Zinnia marylandica inbred 00762-2-2-1-1 to produce hybrid ZM01833. 2005 Progeny of hybrid 01833 were subjected to 5 generations of single plant selection through for large, yellow flowers and compact plants. 2009 F seed was sown. Pollen was collected from 4 plants, mixed, and used to fertilize 2010 5 the same 4 plants to produce variety ‘PAS951086’. * In all crosses described in this table the female is named first. After the initial production of breeder’s seed in 2010 as shown in table 1 above, variety ‘PAS951086’ was reproduced by open pollination in 2011 and 2012. It was also viewed in multiple trials from 2011 through 2013 using seed produced in 2010, 2011, and 2012. Variety ‘PAS951086’ was judged to have uniformly large, yellow flowers, and a uniform habit. It was 1 201500214 judged to be uniform and stable for all characteristics (e.g. flower size, flower color, plant habit) across these 3 generations in 11 separate field trials. It yields and germinates well. Table 2. Seed increases. Year Type of increase Size of increase 2010 Breeder’s seed 4 plants 2011 Foundation seed increase in pots 141 plants Unofficial Copy 2012 Stock seed increase in field 12418 plants Table 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Butterfly Feeding Preferences for Four Zinnia Cultivars1
    Butterfl y Feeding Preferences for Four Zinnia Cultivars1 Kenneth V. Yeargan2 and Sarah M. Colvin3 Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546 Abstract Zinnias are recommended frequently for inclusion in butterfl y gardens as nectar sources for adult butterfl ies, but little is known about butterfl y preferences for different zinnia cultivars. We compared numbers and species of butterfl ies that visited four widely available zinnia cultivars: Zinnia violacea Cav. (formerly Zinnia elegans Jacq.) ‘Lilliput’, ‘Oklahoma’, ‘State Fair’, and Zinnia marylandica Spooner, Stimart, and Boyle ‘Pinwheel’. Mixed colors were used for all cultivars. Based on a total count of 2355 butterfl ies, representing 30 species, more than twice as many total butterfl ies visited ‘Lilliput’ than visited any of the other cultivars. Also, a greater number of butterfl y species visited ‘Lilliput’ than visited any of the other cultivars. More than half of the counted butterfl ies belonged to the family Nymphalidae, with members of the families Pieridae and Hesperiidae being the second and third most frequent visitors, respectively. Index words: Lepidoptera, fl ower visitation, butterfl y gardens. Species used in this study: Zinnia violacea Cav. ‘Lilliput’, ‘Oklahoma’, ‘State Fair’, and Zinnia marylandica Spooner, Stimart, and Boyle ‘Pinwheel’. Signifi cance to the Nursery Industry brids that have been collectively named Zinnia marylandica The popularity of butterfl y gardening is refl ected in the Spooner, Stimart, and Boyle (9). Zinnia marylandica culti- large number of popular press articles, internet sites, and vars include the commercially successful ‘Pinwheel’ (used university extension recommendations devoted to this topic. in our study) and ‘Profusion’ series, both of which exhibit Recommendations of specifi c plants for butterfl y gardens disease resistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List
    Arizona Department of Water Resources Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Official Regulatory List for the Phoenix Active Management Area Fourth Management Plan Arizona Department of Water Resources 1110 West Washington St. Ste. 310 Phoenix, AZ 85007 www.azwater.gov 602-771-8585 Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Acknowledgements The Phoenix AMA list was prepared in 2004 by the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) in cooperation with the Landscape Technical Advisory Committee of the Arizona Municipal Water Users Association, comprised of experts from the Desert Botanical Garden, the Arizona Department of Transporation and various municipal, nursery and landscape specialists. ADWR extends its gratitude to the following members of the Plant List Advisory Committee for their generous contribution of time and expertise: Rita Jo Anthony, Wild Seed Judy Mielke, Logan Simpson Design John Augustine, Desert Tree Farm Terry Mikel, U of A Cooperative Extension Robyn Baker, City of Scottsdale Jo Miller, City of Glendale Louisa Ballard, ASU Arboritum Ron Moody, Dixileta Gardens Mike Barry, City of Chandler Ed Mulrean, Arid Zone Trees Richard Bond, City of Tempe Kent Newland, City of Phoenix Donna Difrancesco, City of Mesa Steve Priebe, City of Phornix Joe Ewan, Arizona State University Janet Rademacher, Mountain States Nursery Judy Gausman, AZ Landscape Contractors Assn. Rick Templeton, City of Phoenix Glenn Fahringer, Earth Care Cathy Rymer, Town of Gilbert Cheryl Goar, Arizona Nurssery Assn. Jeff Sargent, City of Peoria Mary Irish, Garden writer Mark Schalliol, ADOT Matt Johnson, U of A Desert Legum Christy Ten Eyck, Ten Eyck Landscape Architects Jeff Lee, City of Mesa Gordon Wahl, ADWR Kirti Mathura, Desert Botanical Garden Karen Young, Town of Gilbert Cover Photo: Blooming Teddy bear cholla (Cylindropuntia bigelovii) at Organ Pipe Cactus National Monutment.
    [Show full text]
  • GARDENERGARDENER® Thethe Magazinemagazine Ofof Thethe Aamericanmerican Horticulturalhorticultural Societysociety July / August 2007
    TheThe AmericanAmerican GARDENERGARDENER® TheThe MagazineMagazine ofof thethe AAmericanmerican HorticulturalHorticultural SocietySociety July / August 2007 pleasures of the Evening Garden HardyHardy PlantsPlants forfor Cold-ClimateCold-Climate RegionsRegions EveningEvening PrimrosesPrimroses DesigningDesigning withwith See-ThroughSee-Through PlantsPlants WIN THE BATTLE OF THE BULB The OXO GOOD GRIPS Quick-Release Bulb Planter features a heavy gauge steel shaft with a soft, comfortable, non-slip handle, large enough to accommodate two hands. The Planter’s patented Quick-Release lever replaces soil with a quick and easy squeeze. Dig in! 1.800.545.4411 www.oxo.com contents Volume 86, Number 4 . July / August 2007 FEATURES DEPARTMENTS 5 NOTES FROM RIVER FARM 6 MEMBERS’ FORUM 7 NEWS FROM AHS AHS award winners honored, President’s Council trip to Charlotte, fall plant and antiques sale at River Farm, America in Bloom Symposium in Arkansas, Eagle Scout project enhances River Farm garden, second AHS page 7 online plant seminar on annuals a success, page 39 Homestead in the Garden Weekend. 14 AHS PARTNERS IN PROFILE YourOutDoors, Inc. 16 PLEASURES OF THE EVENING GARDEN BY PETER LOEWER 44 ONE ON ONE WITH… Enjoy the garden after dark with appropriate design, good lighting, and the addition of fragrant, night-blooming plants. Steve Martino, landscape architect. 46 NATURAL CONNECTIONS 22 THE LEGEND OF HIDDEN Parasitic dodder. HOLLOW BY BOB HILL GARDENER’S NOTEBOOK Working beneath the radar, 48 Harald Neubauer is one of the Groundcovers that control weeds, meadow rues suited for northern gardens, new propagation wizards who online seed and fruit identification guide, keeps wholesale and retail national “Call Before You Dig” number nurseries stocked with the lat- established, saving wild magnolias, Union est woody plant selections.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscaping: Flowering Annuals for Wyoming Karen L
    Landscaping: Flowering Annuals for Wyoming Karen L. Panter Extension Horticulture Specialist Department of Plant Sciences University of Wyoming B-1170 February 2006 Cooperative Extension Service Author Karen L. Panter, University of Wyoming Extension Horticulture Specialist, Department of Plant Sciences, P.O. Box 3354, Laramie, WY 82071-3354 Layout and Design: Jenna Norfolk, Agricultural Communications and Technology Intern Issued in furtherance of cooperative extension work, acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Glen Whipple, director, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071. Persons seeking admission, employment, or access to programs of the University of Wyoming shall be con- sidered without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, disability, age, political belief, veteran status, sexual orientation, and marital or familial status. Persons with disabilities who require alterna- tive means for communication or program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact their local UW CES Office. To file a complaint, write the UW Employment Practices/Affirmative Action Office, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave., Dept. 3434, Laramie, WY 82071. or bright splashes of color all summer, Fnothing beats annuals. Though many are technically perennials that simply won’t survive cold Wyoming winters, many are truly “annual.” The botanical definition of an annual plant is one that germinates from seed; grows and develops; forms flowers, fruits, and seeds; and then dies all in one growing season. True annuals include sunflowers while others, like impatiens, are perennial in their native Central America but are treated as annuals here. Annuals are highly important in Wyo- Soil and bed preparation ming gardens and landscapes because of Even though annuals are only in the their diversity in foliage color and texture, ground for one growing season, pre-plant flower color and size, and adaptability.
    [Show full text]
  • Pinal AMA Low Water Use/Drought Tolerant Plant List
    Arizona Department of Water Resources Pinal Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Official Regulatory List for the Pinal Active Management Area Fourth Management Plan Arizona Department of Water Resources 1110 West Washington St. Ste. 310 Phoenix, AZ 85007 www.azwater.gov 602-771-8585 Pinal Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Acknowledgements The Pinal Active Management Area (AMA) Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plants List is an adoption of the Phoenix AMA Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plants List (Phoenix List). The Phoenix List was prepared in 2004 by the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) in cooperation with the Landscape Technical Advisory Committee of the Arizona Municipal Water Users Association, comprised of experts from the Desert Botanical Garden, the Arizona Department of Transporation and various municipal, nursery and landscape specialists. ADWR extends its gratitude to the following members of the Plant List Advisory Committee for their generous contribution of time and expertise: Rita Jo Anthony, Wild Seed Judy Mielke, Logan Simpson Design John Augustine, Desert Tree Farm Terry Mikel, U of A Cooperative Extension Robyn Baker, City of Scottsdale Jo Miller, City of Glendale Louisa Ballard, ASU Arboritum Ron Moody, Dixileta Gardens Mike Barry, City of Chandler Ed Mulrean, Arid Zone Trees Richard Bond, City of Tempe Kent Newland, City of Phoenix Donna Difrancesco, City of Mesa Steve Priebe, City of Phornix Joe Ewan, Arizona State University Janet Rademacher, Mountain States Nursery Judy Gausman, AZ Landscape Contractors Assn. Rick Templeton, City of Phoenix Glenn Fahringer, Earth Care Cathy Rymer, Town of Gilbert Cheryl Goar, Arizona Nurssery Assn.
    [Show full text]
  • ZINNIA(Proj.8) ORIGINAL: English DATE: 2020-04-27
    E TG/ZINNIA(proj.8) ORIGINAL: English DATE: 2020-04-27 INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NEW VARIETIES OF PLANTS Geneva DRAFT * ZINNIA UPOV Code(s): ZINNI_ELE ; ZINNI_HAA ; ZINNI_PER ; ZINNI_ANG Zinnia elegans Jacq.; Zinnia haageana Regel; Zinnia peruviana (L.) L.; Zinnia angustifolia Kunth GUIDELINES FOR THE CONDUCT OF TESTS FOR DISTINCTNESS, UNIFORMITY AND STABILITY prepared by experts from Mexico to be considered by the Technical Working Party for Ornamental Plants and Forest Trees at its fifty-second session, to be held in Roelofarendsveen, Netherlands, from 2020-06-08 to 2020-06-12 Disclaimer: this document does not represent UPOV policies or guidance Alternative names:* Botanical name English French German Spanish Zinnia elegans Jacq., Youth and age, Youth- Zinnia élégant Zinnie Rascamoño, Zinnia, Zinnia violacea Cav. and-old-age Miguelito Zinnia haageana Regel Zinnia Mexicana Zinnia peruviana (L.) L. Field zinnia, Peruvian Mal de ojo zinnia, Wild zinnia Zinnia angustifolia Zinnia naranja Kunth The purpose of these guidelines (“Test Guidelines”) is to elaborate the principles contained in the General Introduction (document TG/1/3), and its associated TGP documents, into detailed practical guidance for the harmonized examination of distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) and, in particular, to identify appropriate characteristics for the examination of DUS and production of harmonized variety descriptions. ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS These Test Guidelines should be read in conjunction with the General Introduction and its associated TGP documents. * These names were correct at the time of the introduction of these Test Guidelines but may be revised or updated. [Readers are advised to consult the UPOV Code, which can be found on the UPOV Website (www.upov.int), for the latest information.] TG/ZINNIA(proj.8) Zinnia, 2020-04-27 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Incompatibility in Zinnia Angustifolia HBK (Compositae)
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 1988 Self-incompatibility in Zinnia angustifolia HBK (Compositae) / Raymond R. Samaha University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Samaha, Raymond R., "Self-incompatibility in Zinnia angustifolia HBK (Compositae) /" (1988). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 3410. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/3410 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY IN ZINNIA ANGUSTIFOLIA HBK (COMPOSITAE) I. TECHNIQUES FOR ASSESSING AND QUANTIFYING SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY; AND II. GENETICS A Thesis Presented by RAYMOND R. SAMAHA Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE September 1988 Department of Plant and Soil Sciences SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY IN ZINNIA ANGUSTIFOLIA HBK (COMPOSITAE): I. TECHNIQUES FOR ASSESSING AND QUANTIFYING SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY; AND II. GENETICS A Thesis Presented by RAYMOND R. SAMAHA Approved as to style and content by: horaas H. Boy'Ttv. Chairperson of Committee David L. Mulcahy, Member Department of Plant and Soil Sciences A Raymond, Ang£lique et Nada II est parait-il des terres bruises donnant plus de bl£ qu'un meilleur avril." J. Brel ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank ray major professor Dr. Thomas Boyle for his help and guidance during the past two years, and the other members of my committee: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Letničky Přehled Druhů Zpracováno Podle: Větvička V
    Letničky Přehled druhů Zpracováno podle: Větvička V. & Krejčová Z. (2013) letničky a dvouletky. Adventinum, Praha. ISBN: 80-86858-31-6 Brickell Ch. et al. (1993): Velká encyklopedie květina a okrasných rostlin. Príroda, Bratislava. Kašparová H. & Vaněk V. (1993): Letničky a dvouletky. Praha: Nakladatelství Brázda. (vybrané kapitoly) Botany.cz http://en.hortipedia.com a dalších zdrojů uvedených v úvodu přednášky Vývojová větev jednoděložných rostlin monofyletická skupina zahrnující cca 22 % kvetoucích rostlin apomorfie jednoděložných plastidy sítkovic s proteinovými klínovitými inkluzemi (nejasného významu)* ataktostélé souběžná a rovnoběžná žilnatina listů semena s jednou dělohou vývojová linie Commelinids unlignified cell walls with ferulic acid ester-linked to xylans (fluorescing blue under UV) vzájemně však provázány jen úzce PREZENTACE © JN Řád Commelinales* podle APG IV pět čeledí Čeleď Commelinaceae (křížatkovité) byliny s kolénkatými stonky tropy a subtropy, 40/652 Commelina communis (křížatka obecná) – pěstovaná letnička, v teplých oblastech zplaňuje jako rumištní rostlina Obrázek © Kropsoq, CC BY-SA 3.0 https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e2/Commelina_communis_004.jpg/800px- PREZENTACE © JN Tradescantia Commelina_communis_004.jpg © JN Commelina communis (křížatka obecná) Commelinaceae (křížatkovité) Commelina communis (křížatka obecná) Původ: J a JV Asie, zavlečená do S Ameriky a Evropy Stanoviště v přírodě: vlhká otevřená místa – okraje lesů, mokřady, plevel na polích… Popis: Jednoletá dužnatá bylina, výška až 70 cm, lodyhy poléhavé až přímé, větvené, listy 2řadě střídavé, přisedlé až 8 cm dlouhé a 2 cm široké; květy ve vijanech skryté v toulcovitě stočeném listenu, K(3) zelené, C3: 2 modré, třetí okvětní lístek je bělavý, kvete od července do září; plod: 2pouzdrá tobolka Pěstování: vlhká polostinná místa Výsev: teplejší oblasti rovnou ven, jinak předpěstovat Substrát: vlhký propustný, humózní Approximate distribution of Commelina Množení: semeny i řízkováním communis.
    [Show full text]
  • 02-0601-1901); IDAPA 02.06.02 - Rules Governing Registrations and Licenses (New Chapter, Fee Rule) - Proposed Rule (Docket No
    Dear Senators GUTHRIE, Den Hartog, Jordan, and Representatives BOYLE, Troy, Erpelding: The Legislative Services Office, Research and Legislation, has received the enclosed rules of the Department of Agriculture: IDAPA 02.06.01 - Rules Governing the Production and Distribution of Seed (New Chapter, Fee Rule) - Proposed Rule (Docket No. 02-0601-1901); IDAPA 02.06.02 - Rules Governing Registrations and Licenses (New Chapter, Fee Rule) - Proposed Rule (Docket No. 02-0602-1902); IDAPA 02.06.04 - Rules Governing Plant Exports (New Chapter, Fee Rule) - Proposed Rule (Docket No. 02-0604-1901). Pursuant to Section 67-454, Idaho Code, a meeting on the enclosed rules may be called by the cochairmen or by two (2) or more members of the subcommittee giving oral or written notice to Research and Legislation no later than fourteen (14) days after receipt of the rules' analysis from Legislative Services. The final date to call a meeting on the enclosed rules is no later than 12/09/2019. If a meeting is called, the subcommittee must hold the meeting within forty-two (42) days of receipt of the rules' analysis from Legislative Services. The final date to hold a meeting on the enclosed rules is 01/08/2020. The germane joint subcommittee may request a statement of economic impact with respect to a proposed rule by notifying Research and Legislation. There is no time limit on requesting this statement, and it may be requested whether or not a meeting on the proposed rule is called or after a meeting has been held. To notify Research and Legislation, call 334-4854, or send a written request to the address on the memorandum attached below.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT GU, YU. Cut Flower Production and Economic Analysis
    ABSTRACT GU, YU. Cut Flower Production and Economic Analysis, Polyploidy Induction in Two Zinnia Cultivars, Zinnia Pollination Mechanisms, and DNA Content of Zinnia Species. (Under the direction of Julia L. Kornegay.) Cut flower production is a small, but growing, segment of the North Carolina floriculture industries. In summer 2013, two field trials were conducted to help growers make informed decisions about their production practices. In the first study, two cut flower cultivars, zinnia Benary Giant ‘Scarlet’ and sunflower ‘Procut’, were evaluated for stem yield (number of stems harvested) and flower quality (stem length and flower diameter) under two planting methods (direct-seeded vs. transplanted) and plant densities (16 vs. 32 plants/plot) . In ‘Scarlet’, stem yield was significantly higher at the higher plant density, but there was no significant effect of planting density and planting method on flower quality. Significantly greater severity of powdery mildew (Erysiphe cichoracearum) was observed on zinnia at the higher plant density. Direct-seeded sunflower ‘Pro Cut’ had significantly longer stem lengths and larger flower diameters compared to the transplanted plants. In this study, the fixed costs of direct-seeded cut flower crops were higher than those of transplanted crops because only limited greenhouse space was used in producing the transplants. Growers are recommended to direct seed zinnia at the higher plant density for increased yield, but for disease management, lower densities can reduce the severity of powdery mildew. In ‘Procut’ sunflowers, planting method and density can be used to control flower size and stem length depending on market demands. In the second field study, season-long vs.
    [Show full text]
  • ZINNIA(Proj.3) ORIGINAL: English DATE: 2013-03-13 INTERNATIONAL UNION for the PROTECTION of NEW VARIETIES of PLANTS Geneva
    E TG/ZINNIA(proj.3) ORIGINAL: English DATE: 2013-03-13 INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NEW VARIETIES OF PLANTS Geneva DRAFT * ZINNIA UPOV Code: ZINNI Zinnia L. GUIDELINES FOR THE CONDUCT OF TESTS FOR DISTINCTNESS, UNIFORMITY AND STABILITY prepared by an expert from Mexico to be considered by the Technical Working Party for Ornamental Plants and Forest Trees at its forty-sixth session, to be held in Melbourne, Australia, from April 22 to 26, 2013 * Alternative Names: Botanical name English French German Spanish Zinnia L. Zinnia Zinnia Zinnia Miguelito, Carolina The purpose of these guidelines (“Test Guidelines”) is to elaborate the principles contained in the General Introduction (document TG/1/3), and its associated TGP documents, into detailed practical guidance for the harmonized examination of distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) and, in particular, to identify appropriate characteristics for the examination of DUS and production of harmonized variety descriptions. ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS These Test Guidelines should be read in conjunction with the General Introduction and its associated TGP documents. * These names were correct at the time of the introduction of these Test Guidelines but may be revised or updated. [Readers are advised to consult the UPOV Code, which can be found on the UPOV Website (www.upov.int), for the latest information.] TG/ZINNIA(proj.3) Zinnia, 2013-03-13 - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. SUBJECT OF THESE TEST GUIDELINES...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Responses of Zinnia Angustifolia X Z. Violacea Backcross Hybrids To
    HORTSCIENCE 31(5):851–854. 1996. cell-packs (eight packs per flat and six cells per pack), using one seedling per 92-cm3 cell. A commercial soilless mix (Fafard Growing Responses of Zinnia angustifolia x Z. Mix No. 2; Conrad Fafard, Springfield, Mass.) was used for sowing seed and transplanting. violacea Backcross Hybrids to Three Plants in the glasshouse were fertilized at each irrigation with 20N–4.3P–16.6K at 200 Pathogens mg N/L. The field plot used in Expt. 2 was amended with 10N–4.3P–8.3K at 50 g•m–2 Thomas H. Boyle before planting, and was fertilized twice (once in July and again in August) with 20N–4.3P– Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, French Hall, University of 16.6K at 300 mg N/L. Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003 Glasshouse temperature setpoints were 18/ 21/23 °C (heat/vent/exhaust). Actual glass- Robert L. Wick house air temperatures in Expts. 1 and 3 were Department of Plant Pathology, Fernald Hall, University of Massachusetts, monitored with a LI-1000 datalogger (LI-COR, Amherst, MA 01003 Lincoln, Neb.) equipped with an aspirated LI- 1000-16 thermistor. The datalogger was con- Additional index words. Alternaria zinniae, Erysiphe cichoracearum, Xanthomonas figured with a sampling interval of 60 s and campestris pv. zinniae, Zinnia marylandica, ornamental plants, pest resistance recorded mean temperatures at 1-h intervals. Shading compound (Kool Ray; Continental Abstract. True-breeding lines of Zinnia marylandica Spooner, Stimart & Boyle [allotetra- Products Co., Euclid, Ohio) was applied to the ploids of Z. angustifolia H.B.K.
    [Show full text]