Post Tsunami Environment Initiative

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Post Tsunami Environment Initiative Post Tsunami Environment Initiative Post Tsunami Environment Initiative Funded by UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Executed by Nature Conservation Foundation, Mysore Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and Environment, Bangalore Citizen consumer and civic Action Group nature conservation foundation Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment CAG Citations PTEI. 2007. Report on ecological and social impact assessments post-tsunami in mainland India; Submitted to UNDP. Post-Tsunami Environment Initiative. pp 199. Madhusudan, M. D., V. Srinivas, R. Raghunath, V. Kapoor and R. Arthur. 2007. Understanding coastal vulnerability – Spatial approaches to understanding the impacts of the 2004 tsunami on the Indian mainland. In: Report on ecological and social impact assessments post-tsunami in mainland India ; Submitted to UNDP. Post-Tsunami Environment Initiative. 7-30 p. Mukherjee, N., B. Muthuraman, A. Gokul, V. Kapoor, R. Arthur and K. Shanker. 2007. A gap analysis of ecological impact assessments done in the tsunami affected states. In: Report on ecological and social impact assessments post-tsunami in mainland India; Submitted to UNDP. Post-Tsunami Environment Initiative. 31-42 p. Muthuraman, B., A. Gokul, N. Mukheree, K. Shanker and R. Arthur. 2007. An overview of coastal ecosystems and the impact of the December 2004 tsunami on mainland states in India. In: Report on ecological and social impact assessments post-tsunami in mainland India; Submitted to UNDP. Post-Tsunami Environment Initiative. 43-71 p. Mukheree, N., B. Muthuraman and K. Shanker. 2007. Analysis of post-tsunami coastal plantation initiatives of the Forest Department and non-governmental organisations in Tamil Nadu. In: Report on ecological and social impact assessments post-tsunami in mainland India; Submitted to UNDP. Post-Tsunami Environment Initiative. 73-82 p. Gokul A. and K. Shanker. 2007. A brief assessment of sandy beaches on the southeast coast of India. In: Report on ecological and social impact assessments post-tsunami in mainland India; Submitted to UNDP. Post-Tsunami Environment Initiative. 83-93 p. Alcoverro, T., B. Muthuraman, N. Marba and R. Arthur. 2007. Measuring the impact of the tsunami on seagrass meadows in the Gulf of Mannar and Palk Bay. In: Report on ecological and social impact assessments post-tsunami in mainland India; Submitted to UNDP. Post-Tsunami Environment Initiative. 93- 104 p. Menon, M. and Sridhar, A. 2007. An appraisal of coastal regulation law in tsunami-affected mainland India. In: Report on ecological and social impact assessments post-tsunami in mainland India; Submitted to UNDP. Post-Tsunami Environment Initiative. 105-149 p. Rodriguez, S. 2007. A preliminary socio-ecological review of post-tsunami ecosystem-derived Livelihoods & Rehabilitation efforts. In: Report on ecological and social impact assessments post-tsunami in mainland India; Submitted to UNDP. Post-Tsunami Environment Initiative. 151-191 p. Contents Executive Summary............................................................................................................................................................3 Chapter 1 Understanding coastal vulnerability – the impacts of the 2004 tsunami on the Indian mainland.....................................................................................................................................................................7 Chapter 2 A gap analysis of ecological impact assessments done in the tsunami-affected states.......................................................................................................................................................................................31 Chapter 3 An overview of coastal ecosystems and the impact of the December 2004 tsunami on mainland states in India .......................................................................................................................43 a Analysis of post-tsunami coastal plantation initiatives of the Forest Department and non-governmental organisations in Tamil Nadu......................................................................................................................................................................................75 b A brief assessment of sandy beaches on the south-east coast of India..................................................................................87 c Measuring the impact of the tsunami on seagrass meadows in the Gulf of Mannar and Palk Bay......................99 Chapter 4 An appraisal of Coastal Regulation Law in tsunami-affected mainland India........ 109 Chapter 5 A preliminary socio-ecological review of post-tsunami ecosystem-derived livelihoods and rehabilitation efforts................................................................................................................... 153 1 Executive Summary The earthquake and tsunami of 2004 was a catastrophe of unprecedented magnitude, leaving almost 230,000 people dead or missing, and several millions homeless as it travelled across the Indian Ocean (UN Office of the Special Envoy Report, 2006). In India, the full impact of the tsunami was felt in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, a mere 450 km at the closest point from the point of origin at Banda-Aceh in Sumatra. It resulted in major changes to the topography of the island group, large loss of life and livelihoods, and untold damage to natural systems. Although nearly 2,000 km away the epicentre, the coasts of mainland of India also suffered hugely, and the tsunami affected more than 1200 km of coastline, across Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Kerala and Pondicherry. Nearly 8500 people lost their lives, and thousands more were left homeless. By far the worst casualties were in Tamil Nadu, which alone accounted for 8009 deaths. The tragedy of this event was further compounded by the inequity of its impact. Women and children were less able to get out of harms way, and accounted for an overwhelming majority of the deaths and injuries sustained. Typically, the communities worst affected by the tsunami were marginal fishing and agricultural communities living in tiny villages and hamlets that hugged the coastline, mostly dependent on natural systems for their livelihoods. The tsunami resulted in significant losses to their infrastructure and livelihoods, with thousands of fishing boats and gear destroyed, agricultural fields inundated, jetties and landing sites ruined, and roads and distribution networks badly affected. While the full scale of the impact of the 2004 tsunami on people and their livelihoods is now being gradually understood, more than two years after the event, we do not yet have a complete picture of its consequences to nearshore marine and coastal ecosystems. Although studies have been conducted at several locations along the coast, a comprehensive picture of ecosystem status does not yet exist across the land and seascape. Addressing this need is one of the major objectives of the UNDP Post-Tsunami Environment Initiative. The primary aim during the initial phase of this project was to evaluate the nature of change wrought by the tsunami on natural ecosystems across coastal lands and seascapes, and to broadly assess impacts to socio-ecological systems along the affected coast of mainland India. At one level, the programme is geared towards bringing together a range of disparate studies conducted along the coast, both before and after the tsunami to provide a picture of trends in ecological processes and the impact of the tsunami on these trends. This analysis is complemented by an analysis of satellite imagery to evaluate the immediate and mid-term consequences of this event on coastal ecosystems. At another level, the programme reviews coastal policy and developmental trends in the coastal zone, assessing its applicability, relevance and implementation in a post-tsunami context. This forms part of a longer-term initiative that builds on the critical gaps in our knowledge identified in the first phase, with specific studies and on-ground activities. Resilience and the coast While it is impossible to deny the tragedy of the 2004 tsunami, it also presents an unprecedented opportunity to critically evaluate our coastal defences, and assess the overall resilience of the Indian coastline (coastal habitats and livelihoods) to natural disturbance events. After the tsunami, much attention has been paid on building early-warning systems, and on various hard and soft engineering solutions to prevent damage in the wake of another tsunami. While future tsunamis cannot be 3 Post Tsunami Environment Initiative discounted, on the level, the threat of them affecting the Indian coast lies on a more distant horizon than rather more frequent disturbances such as cyclones, storm surges, and other such unusual weather events. From the best predictions of climate change, these stochastic events are much more likely to increase in frequency and intensity, and the Indian coastline will, in all likelihood, see major changes in its weather systems. It makes good management sense to be concentrating on our immediate responses to these more proximate events, while keeping more distant hazards always in view. In this light, understanding coastal responses to the tsunami becomes all the more important. The tsunami affected a very large section of the coast, and (with notable exceptions) with uniform intensity. Rarely has the response potential of such a large section of the Indian coast been put to test in quite the same way. A careful documentation
Recommended publications
  • Tamil Nadu H2
    Annexure – H 2 Notice for appointment of Regular / Rural Retail Outlet Dealerships IOCL proposes to appoint Retail Outlet dealers in the State of Tamil Nadu as per following details: Name of location Estimated Minimum Dimension (in Finance to be Fixed Fee / monthly Type of Mode of Security Sl. No Revenue District Type of RO Category M.)/Area of the site (in Sq. arranged by the Minimum Sales Site* Selection Deposit M.). * applicant Bid amount Potential # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9a 9b 10 11 12 (Regular/Rural) (SC/SC CC (CC/DC/CFS) Frontage Depth Area Estimated Estimated (Draw of Rs. in Lakhs Rs. in 1/SC PH/ST/ST working fund Lots/Bidding) Lakhs CC 1/ST capital required PH/OBC/OBC requireme for CC 1/OBC nt for developme PH/OPEN/OPE operation nt of N CC 1/OPEN of RO Rs. in infrastruct CC 2/OPEN Lakhs ure at RO PH) Rs. in Lakhs 1 Alwarpet Chennai Regular 150 SC CFS 20 20 400 0 0 Draw of Lots 0 3 2 Andavar Nagar to Choolaimedu, Periyar Pathai Chennai Regular 150 SC CFS 20 20 400 0 0 Draw of Lots 0 3 3 Anna Nagar Chennai Regular 200 Open CC 20 20 400 25 10 Bidding 30 5 4 Anna Nagar 2nd Avenue Main Road Chennai Regular 200 SC CFS 20 20 400 0 0 Draw of Lots 0 3 5 Anna Salai, Teynampet Chennai Regular 250 SC CFS 20 20 400 0 0 Draw of Lots 0 3 6 Arunachalapuram to Besant nagar, Besant ave Road Chennai Regular 150 SC CFS 20 20 400 0 0 Draw of Lots 0 3 7 Ashok Nagar to Kodambakam power house Chennai Regular 150 SC CFS 20 20 400 0 0 Draw of Lots 0 3 8 Ashok Pillar to Arumbakkam Metro Chennai Regular 200 Open DC 13 14 182 25 60 Draw of Lots 15 5 9 Ayanavaram
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Tsunami Rehabilitation of Fishing Communities and Fisheries Livelihoods in Tamil Nadu, Kerala and Andhra Pradesh
    POST-TSUNAMI REHABILITATION OF FISHING COMMUNITIES AND FISHERIES LIVELIHOODS IN TAMIL NADU, KERALA AND ANDHRA PRADESH BY VENKATESH SALAGRAMA REVISED 12 JANUARY 2006 ICM INTEGRATED COASTAL MANAGEMENT 64-16-3A, PRATAP NAGAR, KAKINADA 533 004 ANDHRA PRADESH INDIA TELE: +91 884 236 4851 EMAIL: [email protected]; [email protected] Post-Tsunami Rehabilitation of Fisheries Livelihoods in India CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................2 2. IMPACTS OF TSUNAMI ON COASTAL FISHING COMMUNITIES.............................................................5 Extent of damages..................................................................................................................5 Impacts on craft, gear and infrastructure ...............................................................................5 Impacts of tsunami on different livelihood groups................................................................9 Impact of tsunami on natural resources ...............................................................................10 Impact of tsunami on the psyche of the fishers....................................................................13 Impact of tsunami on social networks .................................................................................13 3. REHABILITATION OF FISHERIES-RELATED LIVELIHOODS.................................................................15 Packages for supporting fisheries-livelihoods
    [Show full text]
  • Tsunami Proceedings.Pdf
    Proceedings of the Regional Workshop on Post-Tsunami Rehabilitation of Fishing Communities and Fisheries- based Livelihoods, 18-19 January 2006, Chennai, India Item Type book Publisher International Collective in Support of Fishworkers Download date 29/09/2021 11:32:10 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/18236 Proceedings Regional Workshop on Post-tsunami Rehabilitation of ishing Communities and isheries-based Livelihoods 18 and 19 January 2006 Chennai, India International Collective in Support of ishworkers (ICS) 27 College Road, Chennai 600 006, India www.icsf.net Regional Workshop on Post-tsunami Rehabilitation of ishing Communities and isheries-based Livelihoods 18 and 19 January 2006, Chennai, India Proceedings March 2006 Layout by P. Sivasakthivel (Jaisakthi Computers) Printed and bound at Nagaraj and Company Pvt. Ltd., Chennai Published by International Collective in Support of )ishworkers 27 College Road, Chennai 600 006, India Tel: +91 44 2827 5303 )ax: +91 44 2825 4457 Email: [email protected] http://www.icsf.net Copyright © ICS) 2006 ISBN 81 902957 0 5 While ICS) reserves all rights for this publication, any portion of it may be freely copied and distributed, provided appropriate credit is given. Any commercial use of this material is prohibited without prior permission. ICS) would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. The opinions and positions expressed in this publication are those of the authors concerned and do not necessarily represent the official views of ICS). Contents
    [Show full text]
  • List of Polling Stations for 72 திண்டிவனம் (தனி) Assembly Segment Within the 13 விழுப்புரம் Parliamentary Constituency
    List of Polling Stations for 72 திண்டிவனம் (தனி) Assembly Segment within the 13 விழுப்புரம் Parliamentary Constituency Whether for all Sl No Part No PS No Locality of Polling Station Building in which it will be located Polling Area voters or men only or women only 123 4 5 6 7 1 1 1 Olakkur‐604305 Government Higher Secondary School, North Side 1.Olakkur (R.V) & (P) Pillaiyar Koil Street , 2.Olakkur (R.V) & (P) Post Office Street , ALL Voters Room No 1, Olakkur ‐604305 3.Olakkur (R,V) & (P) Middle Street , 4.Olakkur (R.V) & (P) Agarakara Street , 5.Olakkur (R.V) & (P) Nasukkan Street 2 2 2 Olakkur‐604305 Government Higher Secondary School, North Side 1.Olakkur (R.V) & (P) Throwpathaiamman Kovil Street , 2.Olakkur (R.V) & (P) ALL Voters Room No 2, Olakkur ‐604305 Railway Peter Road , 3.Olakkur (R.V) & (P) Kalan Street , 4.Olakkur (R.V) & (P) West Street , 5.Olakkur (R.V) & (P) Perumal Koil Street , 6.Olakkur (R.V) & (P) Kaliyamman Koil Street , 7.Olakkur (R.V) & (P) Periyar Street 3 3 3 Olakkur‐604305 Government Higher Secondary School, South Side 1.Olakkur (R.V) & (P) Thropathiamman Kovil Street , 2.Olakkur (R.V) & (P) Kalan ALL Voters Room No 3, Olakkur‐604305 Street , 3.Olakkur (R.V) & (P) Vannarapatti 4 4 4 Olakkur‐604305 Government Higher Secondary School, South Side 1.Olakkur (R.V) & (P) Post Office Street , 2.Olakkur (R.V) & (P) West Street , ALL Voters Room No 41, Olakkur‐604305 3.Olakur (R.V) & (P) Perumal Koil Street , 4.Olakkur (R.V) & (P) Nathamadu 1th Street , 5.Olakkur (R.V) & (P) Nathamedu 7th Street , 6.Olakkur (R.V) & (P)
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation of the Kalivelli Wetland Complex
    Final Report Conservation of the Kalivelli Wetland Complex Towards a Comprehensive Management Plan R. S. Bhalla, Foundation for Ecological Research, Advocacy and Learning July, 2011 This report is a compilation of work taken up by FERAL in the Kailvelli region for the past decade and a half. It seeks to provide a scientific framework for the continuous monitoring of environmental, ecological and anthropogenic parameters that affect the functioning of the Kalivelli wetland complex. It is intended to provide a scientific basis for a comprehensive management plan for the wetland complex. ©2011 FERAL. Foundation for Ecological Research, Advocacy and Learning No.27, 2nd Cross Appavou Nagar Vazhakulam, Puducherry - 605 012, India Tel: 91 -413-2671566, 2225441 http://www.feralindia.org Cover photo: R.S.Bhalla Acknowledgements This document is a compilation of work done by various individuals working on a series of projects in the Kalivelli region. These include scientists and field staff who have worked in FERAL over the past decade and a half, all of whose names cannot be listed out. Among the major contributors to this are (in no particular order) Srinivas.V., Dr.Rauf Ali, Dr.Neil Pelkey, Anupama Pai, Sivarajan, Dhandapani, Benjamin Larroquette, Gopinath Srikandane, Gaspard Appavou, Saravanan, Kumaran K, Rajendran K, Sapna Anne, Mahesh and Sohan Shetty. Agencies that have supported this work include various wings of the Dept. of Science and Technology - New Delhi, the India Canada Environment Facility and the United Nations Development Programme - New Delhi. i Contents Acknowledgements i 1 Introduction 1 Background . .1 Location and climate . .2 Physiography and landuse . .2 Environment .
    [Show full text]
  • Viluppuram District
    CENSUS OF INDIA 2011 TOTAL POPULATION AND POPULATION OF SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES FOR VILLAGE PANCHAYATS AND PANCHAYAT UNIONS VILUPPURAM DISTRICT DIRECTORATE OF CENSUS OPERATIONS TAMILNADU ABSTRACT VILUPPURAM DISTRICT No. of Total Sl. No. Panchayat Union Total Male Total Female Total SC SC Male SC Female Total ST ST Male ST Female Village Population 1 Thirukkoyilur 52 1,27,746 65,039 62,707 42,027 21,453 20,574 398 185 213 2 Mugaiyur 63 1,96,414 99,341 97,073 59,149 30,044 29,105 1,533 766 767 3 Thiruvennainallur 49 1,35,304 68,577 66,727 47,113 23,737 23,376 277 124 153 4 Tirunavalur 44 1,32,567 67,427 65,140 44,062 22,392 21,670 245 122 123 5 Ulundurpettai 53 1,50,054 75,113 74,941 49,007 24,691 24,316 236 118 118 6 Kanai 51 1,39,738 70,672 69,066 35,458 17,836 17,622 2,465 1,219 1,246 7 Koliyanur 43 1,19,915 59,930 59,985 37,444 18,498 18,946 601 312 289 8 Kandamangalam 45 1,45,181 72,400 72,781 51,755 25,583 26,172 219 110 109 9 Vikkiravandi 50 1,22,462 61,668 60,794 38,809 19,611 19,198 1,169 602 567 10 Olakkur 52 86,700 43,373 43,327 34,541 17,342 17,199 1,839 902 937 11 Mailam 47 1,17,439 58,872 58,567 42,231 21,223 21,008 1,624 811 813 12 Marakkanam 56 1,47,713 73,944 73,769 50,833 25,399 25,434 2,103 1,030 1,073 13 Vanur 65 1,64,696 83,132 81,564 58,365 29,388 28,977 2,513 1,257 1,256 14 Gingee 60 1,39,580 70,390 69,190 31,051 15,857 15,194 3,586 1,799 1,787 15 Vallam 66 1,09,270 55,335 53,935 29,588 15,095 14,493 2,201 1,108 1,093 16 Melmalayanur 55 1,41,155 70,621 70,534 27,261 13,597 13,664 2,375 1,175 1,200 17
    [Show full text]
  • Rejuvenate India Movement
    Rejuvenate India Movement Annual Report: 07-08 RIM Annual Report: 2007-08 CONTENTS • President’s Foreword……………………………………….. 2 Part 1: Movement Related Work 1. Samaj Shilpi Program: An overview………………………………………………..5 1.1 MADHYA PRADESH………………………………………………....6 1.2 RAJASTHAN…………………………………………..……………..7 1.3 Maharashtra……………………………………………………… 11 1.4. TAMILNADU……………………………………………..………….12 Part 2: RIM Tsunami Rehabilitation Activities. 2.1. QUALITY EDUCATION PROGRAM, CHILD CARE………………………21 2.2. MICRO ENTERPRISE, LIVELIHOOD, SKILL TRAINING & LAND RECLAMATION……………………………....24 2.3. COMMUNITY BASED DISASTER PREPAREDNESS……………………26 2.4. IT INFO SOLUTIONS………………………………………………..………..27 3. Financial Details……………………………………………………… 28 1 RIM Annual Report: 2007-08 President‘s Foreword It has been another eventful year in RIM towards a mass movement. It is a not a question of success or failure; it is rather a question of efforts and earnestness. When we hear the word —movement“, it often conjures up pictures of large segments of a population advocating a particular issue or an ideology. In RIM we felt that the key to movement for social change and deepening democracy lies in focusing on small groups at the community. It is only at this level that complete participation of an individual human being is even possible. There was also an understanding in RIM that by strengthening communities, mobilizing resources of communities, neighbourhoods, organizations is what would help overcome the problems of today‘s world. This means working on —attitudinal changes“, —dole Vs development“, spontaneity and inner urge to make the villagers to work on their own for their development. It has not been that easy. With limited human and financial resources, we have been striving to make a difference.
    [Show full text]
  • Tamil Nadu Government Gazette
    © [Regd. No. TN/CCN/467/2012-14. GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU [R. Dis. No. 197/2009. 2012 [Price: Rs. 27.20 Paise. TAMIL NADU GOVERNMENT GAZETTE PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY No. 24] CHENNAI, WEDNESDAY, JUNE 20, 2012 Aani 6, Thiruvalluvar Aandu–2043 Part VI—Section 4 Advertisements by private individuals and private institutions CONTENTS PRIVATE ADVERTISEMENTS Pages Change of Names .. 1403-1469 .. NOTICE NO LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY IS ACCEPTED FOR THE PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENTS REGARDING CHANGE OF NAME IN THE TAMIL NADU GOVERNMENT GAZETTE. PERSONS NOTIFYING THE CHANGES WILL REMAIN SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES AND ALSO FOR ANY OTHER MISREPRESENTATION, ETC. (By Order) Director of Stationery and Printing. CHANGE OF NAMES 20722. I, G. Thilagavathi, wife of Thiru A. Devarajan, born 20725. My son, Mohammed Zami, born on 20th October 1997 on 28th May 1967 (native district: Kanyakumari), residing at (native district: Chennai), residing at No. 36, Sri Devi Karumari Old No. 1/37A, New No. 1/31, Chembaha Raman Konam, Amman Nagar, Mundramkattalai, Kundrathur, Chennai- Mundavilai, Kallankuzhi Post, Kanyakumari-629 166, shall 600 122, shall henceforth be known as N. AMIR REZA. henceforth be known as G. SANTHI. NISAR AHMED JILANI. G. THILAGAVATHI. Chennai, 11th June 2012. (Father.) Kallankuzhi, 11th June 2012. 20726. I, Y. Amudha, wife of Thiru M. Yoganathan, born on 20723. I, Regina, T., wife of Thiru Douglas Christy 27th May 1986 (native district: Thiruvannamalai), residing at Ferdandez, born on 23rd April 1967 (native district: The Old No. 2/37, New No. 289, Periya Street, Prammadesham, Nilgiris), residing at No. 11/206-A2B, M.G.R.
    [Show full text]
  • 9.2. Kanyakumari Village
    E4180 v17 ..........................................."'itc~Ma••••••• M ..................t,~ ..... Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Juty 2011 Public Disclosure Authorized Design of Evacuation Shelters and Routes in Environmental Impact Assessment Report 11 Tsunami affected Coastal Districts of Tamil Nadu Volume II- Environmental Setting of Project Villages Table of Content Introduction 1 Thirunelveli District................................................................................................................. 2 2.1. Brief Profile of the District ................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Vijayapathi Village ............................................................................................................... 3 2.2.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 3 2.2.2. Vijayapathi Village Location ..................................................................................................... 3 2.2.3. Project Location ........................................................................................................................ 3 2.2. 4. Project Description .................................................................................................................... 4 2.2.5. Environmental Profile of the project area ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Before the National Green Tribunal Southern Zone
    BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI Application No.148 of 2015 Applicant(s) Respondent(s) Tamil Annai Thamarabarani Welfare Vs. Member Secretary Trust rep. by its Managing Trustee Coastal Aquaculture Authority of India T.Balasubramanian Adityan Ministry of Agriculture 5/24, Main Road, Kayamozhi 12A, Bharathi Street, Vanuvampet Thiruchendur Taluk, Tuticorin District Madipakkam, Chennai 2. The District Collector, Villupuram. 3. The Sub-Collector, Tindivanam 4. The Tahsildar, Marakkanam 5. The Assistant Director of Fisheries, Villupuram 6. The District Forest Officer, Villupuram 7. Joint Director of Agriculture Villupuram 8. The District Environmental Engineer Tamilnadu Pollution Control Board Villupuram 9. The Block Development Officer Marakkanam 10. The Executive Officer, Marakkanan Town Panhayat Legal Practitioners for Applicant(s) Legal practitioners for respondent(s) Mr.V.Kuberan Mr.Vijay for R1 M/s.M.K.Subramanian & P.Velmani for R2 to R7 Mrs.Yasmeen Ali for R8 M/s.Abdul Saleem, S.Saravanan & Vidyalakshmi for R9 & R10 M.A.No.88 of 2016 Smt.Peria Samakal, Vellore District Legal Practitioners for Applicant(s) M/s.K.Rajasekaran, K.Selvamani & S.Patrick M.A.No.89 of 2016 M/s.Marakkanam Prawn Culture Farmers’ Association rep. by its President Mr.D.Rajendran, Villupuram District Legal Practitioners for Applicant(s) M/s.S.Subbiah, P.Raja, R.Chandramohan & R.Sivamurali Note of the Orders of the Tribunal Registry Item No. 21 Date: 1st July, 2016 M.A.No.89 of 2016 This application is filed by M/s.Marakkanam Prawn Culture Farmers’Association to implead them as a party in Main Application No.148 of 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Design, Build 60 Mld Capacity
    TAMIL NADU WATER SUPPLY AND DRAINAGE BOARD CHENNAI. INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVE BIDDING BID DOCUMENT FOR DESIGN, BUILD 60 MLD CAPACITY DESALINATION PLANT BASED ON SEA WATER REVERSE OSMOSIS AT KOONIMEDU IN VILLUPURAM DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU AND OPERATION & MAINTENANCE FOR 20 YEARS IFB No: 15/DSP-VPM PkgI /DO/CE/VLR/2021/Dt.07-01-2021 VOLUME III The Chief Engineer, Tamilnadu Water supply and Drainage Board, 8, 1st East Main Road, Gandhinagar Vellore - 632006 Phone No: 0416 2243743 Email ID: [email protected] Website: https://www.twadboard/tn.gov.in/tenders.html Design, Build 60 Mld Capacity Desalination Plant Based on Sea Water Reverse Osmosis at Koonimedu in Villupuram District, Tamilnadu and Operate and Maintain for 20 Years. Volume-III Drawings Sl. No. Drawing No. Description 1 TWAD-MKM-SWRO-001 Index Map of Project Area 2 TWAD-MKM-SWRO-002 Satellite Imagery of the Project Region 3 TWAD-MKM-SWRO-003 Contour Map and SWRO Desalination Plant Boundary at Koonimedu 4 TWAD-MKM-SWRO-004 Bathymetry Survey Map 5 TWAD-MKM-SWRO-005 Seabed Map 6 TWAD-MKM-SWRO-006 Mosaic Map Satellite Imagery of Proposed Plant Layout, Intake & Outfall Location and 7 TWAD-MKM-SWRO-007 Pipeline Route 8 TWAD-MKM-SWRO-008 Flow Field – Fairweather 9 TWAD-MKM-SWRO-08A Flow Field – Fairweather 10 TWAD-MKM-SWRO-009 Secondary Dispersion –NE Monsoon 11 TWAD-MKM-SWRO-010 Bathymetry - Nested grid system 12 TWAD-MKM-SWRO-011 Flow Field – SW Monsoon 13 TWAD-MKM-SWRO-012 Secondary Dispersion –SW Monsoon 14 TWAD-MKM-SWRO-013 Process Flow Diagram of 60 MLD SWRO Desalination Plant General
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Offences – Application of Professional Technics and Action Plan at the Region Level
    CHAPTER - XL INVESTIGATION OF OFFENCES – APPLICATION OF PROFESSIONAL TECHNICS AND ACTION PLAN AT THE REGION LEVEL ROBBERY AND DACOITY 1831. ROBBERY (1). Robbery is an aggravated form of theft or extortion with the element of violence or imminent fear. Robbery, if committed by five or more persons, becomes dacoity. (2). Theft’s ‘robbery’, if, in order to commit the theft, or in committing the theft, or in carrying away or attempting to carry away property obtained by the theft, the offender, for that end, voluntarily causes or attempts to cause to any person death or hurt or wrongful restraint or fear of instant death or instant hurt or instant wrongful restraint. (3). Extortion is ‘robbery’, if the offender, at the time of committing the extortion, is in the presence of the person put in fear and commits the extortion by putting that person in fear of instant death, instant hurt or instant wrongful restraint to that person or some other person, and, by so putting in fear, induces the person so put in fear then and there to deliver up the thing extorted. (4). Among others the following Modus-operandi adopted in committing robbery requires special attention to be paid for taking as well as assisting the public to take appropriate preventive measures:- (i). Intimidating lone pedestrians, scooterists and other vehicle users and taking away their valuables at the point of knife. (ii). Snatching chains from women going for shopping, temple or for a walk etc., the offenders come on motorcycles either with no number plate or tampered number plate or on stolen vehicles, snatch the chain from the neck, and disappear quickly.
    [Show full text]