DOCSLIB.ORG

FISCAL 2012 Summary of the Adopted Budget

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FISCAL 2012 Summary of the Adopted Budget FISCAL 2012 Summary of the Adopted Budget Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, Mayor City of Baltimore, Maryland BOARD OF ESTIMATES Bernard C. Young, President Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, Mayor Joan M. Pratt, Comptroller George A. Nilson, City Solicitor Al Foxx, Director of Public Works CITY COUNCIL President, Bernard C. “Jack” Young Vice President, Edward L. Reisinger FIRST DISTRICT James B. Kraft SECOND DISTRICT Nicholas D’Adamo, Jr. THIRD DISTRICT Robert W. Curran FOURTH DISTRICT Bill Henry FIFTH DISTRICT Rochelle Spector SIXTH DISTRICT Sharon Green Middleton SEVENTH DISTRICT Belinda K. Conaway EIGHTH DISTRICT Helen L. Holton NINTH DISTRICT William Welch TENTH DISTRICT Edward L. Reisinger ELEVENTH DISTRICT William H. Cole, IV TWELFTH DISTRICT Carl Stokes THIRTEENTH DISTRICT Warren Branch FOURTEENTH DISTRICT Mary Pat Clarke DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE Edward J. Gallagher Director of Finance FISCAL 2012 SUMMARY OF THE ADOPTED BUDGET Table of Contents Budgetary Environment Municipal Organization Chart ........................................................................................................1 Mayor’s Tax Message ......................................................................................................................2 Budget Overview Fiscal 2012..............................................................................................................3 Strategic Context for the Budget......................................................................................................6 Budget Process and Related Policies Budget Process Calendar.........................................................................................................................24 Budget-Making Process...........................................................................................................................25 Revenue Outlook Economic Outlook....................................................................................................................................26 Revenue Forecast – Major Revenues .....................................................................................................30 Real Property Tax Expenditures.............................................................................................................37 Summary of City Real Property Tax Credit Programs .......................................................................41 Property Tax Base and Estimated Property Tax Yield ........................................................................42 Budget Plan Funding Sources and Expenditures by Function.................................................................................43 Selected Summary Views – Total Operating and Capital Budget ....................................................44 Summary of General Fund Budgetary Trends.....................................................................................46 Trends in Total Operating and Capital Budget - Summary ...............................................................47 Trends in Operating and Capital Budget – Summary by Fund.........................................................48 Description of Operating and Capital Funds .......................................................................................49 Budgeted Funds – Total and Net Appropriations ...............................................................................50 Major Types of Expenses – Total Operating and Capital Funds .......................................................51 Trends in Full-Time Budgeted Positions- All Funds...........................................................................52 Trends in Full-Time Budgeted Positions–General Fund ....................................................................53 Past and Projected Budgetary Fund Balances ......................................................................................54 Operating Budget Where the Money Comes From and How the Money is Used ..........................................................55 Better Schools ............................................................................................................................................56 Safer Streets ...............................................................................................................................................60 Stronger Neighborhoods ........................................................................................................................72 A Growing Economy ...............................................................................................................................84 Innovative Government...........................................................................................................................93 A Cleaner and Healthier City ...............................................................................................................108 Operating Appropriations by Fund.....................................................................................................119 Operating Appropriations by Outcome and Fund............................................................................120 Operating Appropriations by Outcome and Agency........................................................................121 Operating Budget Compared with Prior Year Budget by Outcome, Service and Fund ..............123 Operating Budget Compared with Prior Year Budget by Agency, Service and Fund.................136 Changes to Permanent Full-Time Positions .......................................................................................151 i Capital Budget Where the Money Comes From and How the Money Is Used (Fiscal 2012) .................................162 Capital Budget Plan Highlights............................................................................................................163 Capital Plan Budgetary Policy..............................................................................................................164 Where the Money Comes From and How the Money Is Used (Fiscal 2012-2017) ........................165 Capital Projects Impact on Operating Budget....................................................................................166 Total Capital Appropriations................................................................................................................167 Capital Budget Fund Distribution by Agency Detail........................................................................168 Revenue Detail Budgetary Funds – Descriptions and Policies....................................................................................169 Revenue Estimate: General Fund (Operating and Capital Budgets) .............................................................................181 Motor Vehicle Fund (Operating and Capital Budgets)..................................................................186 Parking Management Fund (Operating and Capital Budgets).....................................................187 Convention Center Bond Fund (Operating and Capital Budgets)...............................................188 Waste Water Utility Fund (Operating and Capital Budgets)........................................................189 Water Utility Fund (Operating and Capital Budgets)....................................................................190 Parking Enterprise Fund (Operating and Capital Budgets)..........................................................191 Conduit Enterprise Fund (Operating and Capital Budgets).........................................................192 Loan and Guarantee Enterprise Fund (Operating and Capital Budgets)....................................193 Federal Grants (Operating Budget) ..................................................................................................194 State Grants (Operating Budget) .......................................................................................................197 Special Grants (Operating Budget) ...................................................................................................199 Debt Service Debt Service Overview ..........................................................................................................................201 Debt Service Expenses and Appropriations by Fund and Type......................................................208 Appendix Baltimore Profile – General City Information ....................................................................................209 Demographic and Economic Profile and Trends ..............................................................................210 Major City Agencies - Selected Statistics.............................................................................................211 Fiscal 2011 Supplementary Appropriations .......................................................................................212 Key Budgetary and Financial Policies .................................................................................................214 Budgetary and Accounting Basis .........................................................................................................218 Operating and Capital Plan Budgetary Control ................................................................................220 Budgetary Authority and Process........................................................................................................223 Operating Budget Fund Distribution ..................................................................................................230
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Report Fiscal Year 2020
    Maryland State Archives Annual Report Fiscal Year 2020 Annual Report of the State Archivist to the Governor and General Assembly (State Government Article, § 9-1007(d)) Timothy D. Baker State Archivist and Commissioner of Land Patents August 2020 Maryland State Archives 350 Rowe Boulevard · Annapolis, MD 21401 410-260-6400 · http://msa.maryland.gov ​ ​ MSA Annual Report Fiscal Year 2020 This Page Left Blank MSA Annual Report Fiscal Year 2020 This Page Left Blank MSA Annual Report Fiscal Year 2020 Table of Contents Agency Organization & Overview of Activities . 3 Hall of Records Commission Meeting of November 14, 2019 Agenda . 27 Minutes . .47 Chronology of Staff Events. .55 Records Retention Schedules . .65 Disposal Certificate Approvals . .. .70 Records Received . .78 Special Collections Received . 92 Hall of Records Commission Meeting of May 08, 2020 Agenda . .93 Minutes . .115 Chronology of Staff Activities . .121 Records Retention Schedules . .129 Disposal Certificate Approvals . 132 Records Received . 141 Special Collections Received . .. 158 Maryland Commission on Artistic Property Meeting of Agenda . 159 Minutes . 163 MSA Annual Report Fiscal Year 2020 This Page Left Blank 2 MSA Annual Report Fiscal Year 2020 STATE ARCHIVES ANNUAL REPORT FY 2020 OVERVIEW · Hall of Records Commission Agenda, Fall 2019 ​ · Hall of Records Commission Agenda, Spring 2020 ​ · Commission on Artistic Property Agenda, Fall 2019 ​ The State Archives was created in 1935 as the Hall of Records and reorganized under its present name in 1984 (Chapter 286, Acts of 1984). Upon that reorganization the Commission on Artistic Property was made part of the State Archives. As Maryland's historical agency, the State Archives is the central depository for government records of permanent value.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Notes Introduction Notes to Pages 1–7 1. When William Donald Schaefer left his final term unfinished in order to become state governor, Clarence “Du” Burns, an African American and chairman of the City Council, succeeded Schaefer, finished his term, and thus technically became the first black mayor. 2. Sandy Banisky and Ann LoLordo, “Kurt Schmoke Sworn in as 46th Mayor of Baltimore,” Baltimore Sun, December 11, 1987. Schmoke is quoted in Marion E. Orr, “Black Mayors and Human-Capital Enhancement Policies: A Study of Baltimore,” unpublished paper presented at National Conference of Black Political Scientists, March 1991. 3. Michael Ollove, “Schmoke Takes a Sizeable Political Risk by Assuming Responsibility for Schools,” Baltimore Sun, July 3, 1988. 4. The statistics of poor performance by students in the Baltimore public school system were rehearsed in numerous reports, including the Abell Foundation, “A Growing Inequality, a Report on the Financial Condition of the Baltimore City Public Schools,” Baltimore, 1989; Governor’s Commission on School Funding, “Report,” Baltimore, January 1994; Governor’s Commission on School Performance, “The Report of,” Annapolis, 1989; Commission for Students at Risk, “Maryland’s Challenge,” Annapolis, January 1990; Peter L. Szanton, “Baltimore 2000, a Choice of Futures,” Baltimore: Morris Goldseker Foundation, 1986. To compare the local education studies with national studies of public education, see U.S. Excellence in Education Commission, “A Nation At Risk,” Washington, DC, U.S. Department of Education, 1983; Task Force on Education for Economic Growth, “Action for Excellence,” Washington, DC, 1983; Editors of Education Week, Charting a Course for Reform (Washington, DC: Editorial Projects in Education, 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • A Baltimore Love Thing: a Look at Social Dances and Their Connection to Communal Healing Amongst Black People in Baltimore
    Sarah Lawrence College DigitalCommons@SarahLawrence Dance/Movement Therapy Theses Dance/Movement Therapy Graduate Program 5-2020 A Baltimore Love Thing: A Look at Social Dances and Their Connection to Communal Healing Amongst Black People in Baltimore Naja Cooper Sarah Lawrence College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.slc.edu/dmt_etd Part of the Dance Commons, and the Dance Movement Therapy Commons Recommended Citation Cooper, Naja, "A Baltimore Love Thing: A Look at Social Dances and Their Connection to Communal Healing Amongst Black People in Baltimore" (2020). Dance/Movement Therapy Theses. 68. https://digitalcommons.slc.edu/dmt_etd/68 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Dance/Movement Therapy Graduate Program at DigitalCommons@SarahLawrence. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dance/Movement Therapy Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@SarahLawrence. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 A Baltimore Love Thing: A Look at Social Dances and Their Connection to Communal Healing Amongst Black People in Baltimore Naja Cooper May 2020 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Dance/Movement Therapy Sarah Lawrence College 2 Abstract This thesis provides insight on the vast effects of systematic racial injustice towards Black peo- ple living in Baltimore, Maryland. It highlights the negative effects of racism and the impact of collective shared trauma, while also bringing attention to the resilience long-time and current res- idents have shown through the action of movement, dance, and simply being. The essence of the Baltimore originated social dance called Rockin’ Off/Shakin’ Off, developed in 2005, provides the chance to dance out lived individual and shared experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime Reduction & Departmental Transformation Plan
    Crime Reduction & Departmental Transformation Plan Year one review: July 1, 2019 - June 30, 2020 Table of Contents MESSAGE FROM THE POLICE COMMISSIONER 4 CITYWIDE CRIME STATISTICS 5 MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES 6 MODERNIZING & BUILDING THE DEPARTMENT FOR THE FUTURE 7 STRENGTHENING Local, State & Federal Partnerships 8 MAJOR POLICE ACADEMY INVESTMENTS 9 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT & TRAINING 10 MANAGING major events with distinction 11 GUIDing OPERATIONS by Utilizing DATA-DRIVEN TOOLS & STRATEGIES 12 INCREASED FOCUS ON OFFICER SAFETY & WELLNESS 14 CREATING ACCOUNTABILITY BY REFORMING PUBLIC INTEGRITY BUREAU 15 Reforming the BPD through the CONSENT DECREE 16 MESSAGE FROM THE POLICE COMMISSIONER It has been one year since I presented the Baltimore Police Department’s Five-Year Strategic Crime Reduction and Transformation Plan. This past year has presented many challenges, from a change in City leadership to a ransomware attack to the COVID-19 emergency to mass police reform protests, all in the midst of historic levels of violence. Despite these challenges, progress continues to be made on many fronts. This document outlines some of the notable accomplishments of the work that we have done during this time. I am extremely proud of my team, the brave men and women of the BPD, and all of the progress that we have achieved. No one accomplishment by itself will solve all of our problems, but taken together represent positive momentum and a foundation that we will build upon this upcoming year and beyond. As we do this, we will add greater capacity, become a stronger Department, and improve our ability to respond to and prevent crime in Baltimore.
    [Show full text]
  • Running Head: the “REVOLVING DOOR” of INCARCERATION LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MARYLAND
    Running Head: THE “REVOLVING DOOR” OF INCARCERATION LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MARYLAND The “Revolving Door” of Mass Incarceration: What Keeps Baltimore City Safe? WR305 December 18, 2020 Research Team Katie Metzger Vanessa Cuppari THE “REVOLVING DOOR” OF INCARCERATION 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary……………..…………………………...…………………….…………….3 ​ List of Figures………………………………………………...……………....……………..……4 ​ Introduction………………………………………………...……………………………...……..5 ​ Operational Definitions……………………………………………………………………5 Socioeconomic Background..………………………………………………...…………...6 Methods………………………………………………...…………………………….…………..9 ​ Secondary………………………………………………….…….....…………………….10 Incarceration and Crime………………………………………….………………10 Psychopathology of Prisonization…….………….…………………....…………11 Primary…………………………………………………………….……………………..12 Govans Resident Interview……………………………………....………………12 A Step Forward Interview……………….....…………………………………….12 Results…………....………………………….…………………………………………………..12 ​ Incarceration and Crime..………………………………………....……………………...13 Correlation Between Incarceration and Crime…………………………………..13 Why Is Incarceration Ineffective?……………….……………………………….14 “Revolving Door” of Incarceration…………………………...………………….16 “One Down, We All Down”……………………………………………………..17 Psychopathology of Prisonization………………………….…………………………….18 Trauma in the Institutionalization Process……………..……………….………..18 Reentry and Recidivism………...……………………………………………......21 Community Assets in Societal Reentry………………………………………….21 Discussion………………………………..…………………………….………………………..24 ​ Incarceration and Crime…………...……………………………………………………..24
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal 2021 Agency Detail
    AGENCY DETAIL - VOLUME I BOARD OF ESTIMATES RECOMMENDATIONS FISCAL 2021 BERNARD C. “JACK” YOUNG, MAYOR CITY OF BALTIMORE, MARYLAND Board of Estimates: Brandon M. Scott, President City Council Bernard C. “Jack” Young, Mayor Joan M. Pratt, Comptroller Dana P. Moore, Acting City Solicitor Matthew W. Garbark, Acting Director of Public Works City Council: President: Brandon M. Scott Vice President: Sharon Green Middleton First District: Zeke Cohen Second District: Danielle McCray Third District: Ryan Dorsey Fourth District: Bill Henry Fifth District: Isaac “Yitzy” Schleifer Sixth District: Sharon Green Middleton Seventh District: Leon F. Pinkett, III Eighth District: Kristerfer Burnett Ninth District: John T. Bullock Tenth District: Edward L. Reisinger Eleventh District: Eric T. Costello Twelfth District: Robert Stokes, Sr. Thirteenth District: Shannon Sneed Fourteenth District: Mary Pat Clarke Department of Finance: Henry J. Raymond, Director Photo Credit: Baltimore City Recreation and Parks Marketing Communications Division Dave Pope for Mayor’s Office of Children and Family Success Phylicia Ghee for Live Baltimore Table of Contents Introduction 1 Agency Overview, Recommendations, and Details 7 Board of Elections . 9 City Council . 15 Comptroller . 23 Council Services . 37 Courts: Circuit Court . 43 Courts: Orphans’ Court . 51 Employees’ Retirement Systems . 57 Enoch Pratt Free Library . 69 Finance . 79 Fire..............................................................113 General Services . 153 Health . 171 Housing and Community Development . 229 Human Resources . 281 Law..............................................................299 Legislative Reference . 317 Liquor License Board . 325 Mayoralty . 333 Intentionally Left Blank FISCAL 2021 AGENCY DETAIL - VOLUME I Board of Estimates Recommendations Introduction Intentionally Left Blank Fiscal 2021 Municipal Organization Chart THE PEOPLE PRESIDENT OF CITY COMPTROLLER MAYOR CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL BOARD OF ESTIMATES Council Equity and Housing and Finance Fire Health Services Civil Rights Community Dev.
    [Show full text]
  • City Services and the Justice System: Do Korean American Storeowners
    City Services and the Justice System: Do Korean American Storeowners in Baltimore, Maryland Get Equal Treatment? Maryland Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights July 2004 This report of the Maryland Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights was prepared for the information and consideration of the Commission. Statements and viewpoints in this report should not be attributed to the Commission, but only to the participants at the community forum, other individuals or documents cited, or the Advisory Committee. The United States Commission on Civil Rights The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights is an independent, bipartisan agency established by Congress in 1957, reconstituted in 1983, and reauthorized in 1994. It is directed to investigate complaints alleging that citizens are being deprived of their right to vote by reason of their race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or by reason of fraudulent practices; study and collect information relating to discrimination or a denial of equal protection of the laws under the Constitution because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice; appraise federal laws and policies with respect to discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice; serve as a national clearinghouse for information in respect to discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin; submit reports, findings, and recommendations to the President and Congress; and issue public service announcements to discourage discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Magazine, 1999, Volume 94, Issue No. 2
    /v^^^-^£^d ^?S-^ r,HALL OF RECORDS LIBRARY Summer 1999 KrTVV L AND Historical Magazine 7 lib • \i ' >* p W- 1* 1 Hf> Ai THE MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY Founded 1844 Dennis A. Fiori, Director The Maryland Historical Magazine Robert I. Cottom, Editor Donna B. Shear, Managing Editor Patricia Dockman Anderson, Associate Editor David Prencipe, Photographer Robin Donaldson Goblentz, Christopher T. George, Jane Gushing Lange, Mary Markey, and Robert W. Schoeberlein, Editorial Associates Regional Editors John B. Wiseman, Frostburg State University Jane G. Sween, Montgomery County Historical Society Pegram Johnson III, Accoceek, Maryland Acting as an editorial hoard, the Publications Committee of the Maryland Historical Society oversees and supports the magazine staff. Members of the committee are: John W. Mitchell, Upper Marlboro; Trustee/Chair John S. Bainbridge Jr., Baltimore County Jean H. Baker, Goucher College James H. Bready, Baltimore Sun Robert J. Brugger, The Johns Hopkins University Press Lois Green Carr, St. Mary's City Commission Suzanne E. Chapelle, Morgan State University Toby L. Ditz, The Johns Hopkins University Dennis A. Fiori, Maryland Historical Society, ex-offtcio David G. Fogle, University of Maryland Jack G. Goellner, Baltimore Roland C. McConnell, Morgan State University Norvell E. Miller III, Baltimore Charles W. Mitchell, Williams & Wilkins Richard Striner, Washington College lohn G. Van Osdell, Towson University Alan R. Walden, WBAL, Baltimore Brian Weese, Bibelot, Inc., Pikesville Members Emeritus John Higham, The Johns Hopkins University Samuel Hopkins, Baltimore Charles McC. Mathias, Chevy Chase ISSN 0025-4258 © 1999 by the Maryland Historical Society. Published as a benefit of membership in the Maryland Historical Society in March, June, September, and December.
    [Show full text]
  • Guilford Home on Display
    the guilford association, balt. md The Guilford News GUILFORDASSOCIATION.ORG SPRING 2015 Oak Acre, 4309 N. Charles Street, will be the site of the Baltimore Guilford Home Symphony Associates 39th Decorators’ Show House. The distinguished Guilford home of the late Ruth Hurlock was designed in 1928 by Mattu and White in a Southern Colonial Revival style. on Display It was built by Clarence Harlan Hurlock, Sr. who was very much involved in the details of the house design and garden landscaping. It has remained in the Hurlock family for more than 90 years. OAK ACRE, 4309 N. CHARLES STREET, WILL Twenty-three areas of Oak Acre are being decorated by BE THE SITE OF THE BALTIMORE SYMPHONY well-known local designers. The house will be open for tours from ASSOCIATES 39TH DECORATORS’ SHOW Sunday, April 26 through Sunday, May 17 with the following HOUSE THIS SPRING. hours: Sundays 1 – 5pm; Mondays: closed; Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Fridays and Saturdays: 10 am – 4pm; Thursdays: 10am – 8pm. Show House tickets are $25 in advance and are available through the BSO Ticket Office and at Graul’s Markets, Budeke Paint Stores and Watson’s Garden Center. Tickets are $30 at the door. The mission of the Baltimore Symphony Associates is to raise funds for the Baltimore Symphony Orchestra Education programs. This includes the Education Mid-Week Concerts, OrchKids and the Baltimore Symphony Youth Orchestras. Oak Acres, designed in 1928 by Mattu and White and occupied continuously for 90 years by the Hurlock family. Sherwood Gardens in early spring bloom. 2 SPRING 2015 FROM THE PRESIDENT he winter that seemed never to end has finally yielded to focused on assuring that the police coverage is maintained and that spring and we look forward to warmer weather and the Guilford is a safe community.
    [Show full text]
  • Rg 1 Baltimore Town Commissioners (1729-97)
    RG 1 BALTIMORE TOWN COMMISSIONERS (1729-97) RG. 1 BALTIMORE TOWN COMMISSIONERS 1729-1797 The Baltimore Town Commissioners was created in 1729 as part of the legislative act for "erecting" Baltimore Town. The body consisted of seven commissioners, appointed for life, empowered to buy land, survey and sell lots, and settle disputes about property boundaries. The commission was the sole vestige of town government until the early 1780*s. In 1745 when Jones Town merged with Baltimore, the commissioners were given the authority to procure a three pound annual assessment from residents. In 1784 they were empowered to erect street lamps and have them lighted, to appoint constables and watchmen, to levy a tax on property, and to appoint a treasurer. Between 1784 and 1793 the commissioners were authorized justices of the peace. Occasionally special duties were assigned to them by the Maryland Legislature, including construction of market houses, maintenance of streets, and other special assessments and taxes. By the early 1780!s the commissioners shared their light administrative responsibilities with a Board of Special Commissioners and a Board of Port Wardens. The state government formed the latter two bodies in 1782 and 1783 respectively. They made up the remainder of the town's self government until its incorporation in 1796. The Special Commissioners were largely responsible for the construction and maintenance of streets and bridges. The Board of Port Wardens regulated the construction of wharves, surveyed the harbor, and supervised the collection of a duty on all vessels entering and leaving the port. Despite the three boards, essential government functions remained in Annapolis with the state government.
    [Show full text]
  • Amended Complaint and Jury Demand
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND MARYLAND STATE CONFERENCE OF NAACP BRANCHES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CASE NO. 06-1863 (CCB) BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. _______________________________________ Proposed New Plaintiffs, TIMOTHY JOHNSON, 201 S. Main St., Bryan, TX 77803; TAVIS CROCKETT, 2909 W. Mosher St., Baltimore, MD 21216; RAFFIC SCOTT, 31 Saturn Ct., Parkville, MD 21234; KERRELL K. WRIGHT, 535 Rossiter St., Baltimore, MD 21212; CAROL HIGGS, 1601 Guilford Ave. Apt. 4 South, Baltimore, MD 21204; ARMONDO HORSEY, 103 E. Chase St., Baltimore, MD, 21202; JONATHAN LINDSAY, 4 Fountain Ridge, Parkville, MD 21234; ERIN MARCUS, 932 N. Charles St. Apt. 3R, Baltimore, MD 21201; and JEFFREY CHAPMAN, 3428 Dayta Drive, Baltimore, 21218. Existing Plaintiffs with updated information, TYRONE BRAXTON, 5007 Corley Road, Apt. C3, Baltimore, MD 21207; AARON STONER, 14241D Falling Waters Road, Williamsport, MD 21795, Proposed New Defendants, SHEILA DIXON, individually, and in her official capacity as Mayor, City of Baltimore, 100 North Holliday St., Baltimore, MD 21202; GARY D. MAYNARD, individually, and in his official capacity as Secretary, Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, c/o Douglas F. Gansler, Attorney General of Maryland, 200 St. Paul Place, Baltimore, MD 21202; P/O HERON, individually, and in his official capacity as a Police Officer, Baltimore City Police Department, 601 East Fayette St., Baltimore, MD 21202; P/O J. GREY, individually, and in his official capacity as a Police
    [Show full text]
  • Cross Keys Valve House
    The Commission for Historical and Architectural Preservation Landmark Designation Report April 9, 2013 Cross Keys Valve House 5106 Falls Road Baltimore, Maryland Commission for historical & architectural preservation KATHLEEN KOTARBA, Executive Director Charles L. Benton, Jr. Building 417 East Fayette Street Eighth Floor Baltimore, MD 21202-3416 410-396-4866 STEPHANIE RAWLINGS-BLAKE THOMAS J. STOSUR Mayor Director Significance Summary The Cross Keys Valve House was one of three stone Classical Revival gatehouses that serviced Baltimore City’s municipal water system along a conduit that ran from Lake Roland to the Mt. Royal Reservoir. Begun in 1858 and completed in 1862, this gravity- powered conduit system then located in Baltimore County provided the citizens of Baltimore with safe clean water. It was an engineering marvel when completed, and was the city’s first truly public utility. The waterworks was designed by James Slade, City Engineer for Boston and consulting engineer for the Baltimore Waterworks, and the waterworks was informed by the best practices of waterworks and engineers in other major American cities. The Cross Keys Valve House, completed in 1860, was originally called the “Harper Waste Weir”, which described a lower chamber in the valve house that collected debris from the water as it rushed through the conduit on its way to the city boundaries. The Valve House and the conduit over which it sits played a significant role in the city’s municipal water system, and represents a major engineering feat for the City of Baltimore. Property History This property is located just north of the modern gatehouse entrance of the Village of Cross Keys on the west side of Falls Road.
    [Show full text]