Crime Victims Compensation in Maryland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Crime Victims Compensation in Maryland RESEARCH REPORT Crime Victims May 2003 Compensation in Maryland: Accomplishments and Strategies for the Future Lisa Newmark Megan Schaffer Report to the Maryland Governor’s Office of Crime Control and Prevention The Urban Institute Justice Policy Center 2100 M St., NW Washington, DC 20037 This project was funded by the state of Maryland Governor‘s Office of Crime Control and Prevention under a Byrne Memorial Grant (2002-DB-MU-0024), awarded by the U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view or opinions contained within this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of any agency. Any questions or comments can be forwarded to the first author at the Urban Institute’s Justice Policy Center ([email protected] or 202 261-5566). For an electronic version (Adobe Acrobat) of the report, send an e-mail to [email protected] and specify “CICB report.” Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...............................................................................................................1 ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................................3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................5 COMPENSATION FOR CRIME VICTIMS IN MARYLAND................................................................9 Our Assessment of the Compensation Program ....................................................................................... 9 The Costs of Crime ................................................................................................................................ 10 Public Financial Assistance for Crime Victims........................................................................................ 11 Federal Regulations.........................................................................................................................................11 Maryland’s Criminal Injuries Compensation Board.................................................................................12 State Regulations ............................................................................................................................................13 The Claim Process...........................................................................................................................................15 How Does Maryland’s Program Compare with Other States’ Programs? ................................................ 20 Plans For Future Development ............................................................................................................... 27 Developments to Expand Services....................................................................................................................27 Developments to Improve Operations...............................................................................................................28 A Felony Exclusion Rule ...................................................................................................................................28 CLIENTS’ EXPERIENCES WITH COMPENSATION ......................................................................29 Characteristics of Claims ....................................................................................................................... 30 Claimant and Victim Demographics .................................................................................................................30 Characteristics of the Crimes...........................................................................................................................31 Claim Processing ............................................................................................................................................32 Claim Outcomes..............................................................................................................................................35 What Do Claimants Say? ........................................................................................................................ 36 The Crime .......................................................................................................................................................36 Learning About Compensation .........................................................................................................................37 Compensation Policies and Claimants’ Needs ..................................................................................................37 Filing for Compensation...................................................................................................................................39 Processing the Claim.......................................................................................................................................39 The Claim Outcome.........................................................................................................................................40 Satisfaction with the Compensation Program ...................................................................................................40 What Makes a Satisfied Client? ........................................................................................................................41 AWARENESS AND ACCESS BARRIERS FOR VICTIMS ................................................................43 Who Are the Victims and the Crimes?..................................................................................................... 45 Crime-Related Services and Expenses.................................................................................................... 46 Victims’ Knowledge of Compensation .................................................................................................... 48 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE STRATEGIES ....................................51 Expanding to New Clients ...................................................................................................................... 51 Relax the Physical Injury Requirement .............................................................................................................51 Continue Outreach to Diverse Groups...............................................................................................................52 Explore Access to Compensation by Potentially Underserved Groups of Victims ................................................53 Enhance Program Materials.............................................................................................................................53 Assure Reporting and Filing Deadlines Do Not Chill Claims...............................................................................53 Meeting Claimants’ Needs More Fully .................................................................................................... 54 Reduce or Eliminate the Minimum Requirement for Lost Work..........................................................................54 Raise the Cap for Funeral/Burial Expenses.......................................................................................................54 Analyze the Use of Mental Health Counseling Benefits ......................................................................................54 Allow Additional Types of Benefits....................................................................................................................55 Clarify Payer of Last Resort Requirements........................................................................................................55 Serving Clients More Efficiently.............................................................................................................. 55 Continue to Streamline Verification Procedures................................................................................................55 Reduce the Requirement for Board Members’ Approval ....................................................................................56 Improve Communications With Claimants Who Are Being Denied......................................................................56 Paying for Program Expansion............................................................................................................... 56 Steps to Maximize Federal Allocations .............................................................................................................57 Steps to Maximize Subrogation Revenues ........................................................................................................57 Monitoring and Evaluating Program Developments................................................................................ 57 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................59 APPENDIX A: CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION BOARD LEGISLATION ............................61 APPENDIX B: CICB WEBSITE MATERIALS, INCLUDING APPLICATION AND INSTRUCTIONS ...67 APPENDIX C: CLAIMANT SURVEY SAMPLING AND SURVEY METHODS ...................................79 Survey Representativeness..................................................................................................................... 80 Sampling Methods ..........................................................................................................................................80
Recommended publications
  • Women and the Law in Colonial Maryland, 1648-1715 Monica C
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects "Justice Without Partiality": Women and the Law in Colonial Maryland, 1648-1715 Monica C. Witkowski Marquette University Recommended Citation Witkowski, Monica C., ""Justice Without Partiality": Women and the Law in Colonial Maryland, 1648-1715" (2010). Dissertations (2009 -). Paper 27. http://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/27 “JUSTICE WITHOUT PARTIALITY”: WOMEN AND THE LAW IN COLONIAL MARYLAND, 1648-1715 by Monica C. Witkowski A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2010 ABSTRACT “JUSTICE WITHOUT PARTIALITY”: WOMEN AND THE LAW IN COLONIAL MARYLAND, 1648-1715 Monica C. Witkowski Marquette University, 2010 What was the legal status of women in early colonial Maryland? This is the central question answered by this dissertation. Women, as exemplified through a series of case studies, understood the law and interacted with the nascent Maryland legal system. Each of the cases in the following chapters is slightly different. Each case examined in this dissertation illustrates how much independent legal agency women in the colony demonstrated. Throughout the seventeenth century, Maryland women appeared before the colony’s Provincial and county courts as witnesses, plaintiffs, defendants, and attorneys in criminal and civil trials. Women further entered their personal cattle marks, claimed land, and sued other colonists. This study asserts that they improved their social standing through these interactions with the courts. By exerting this much legal knowledge, they created an important place for themselves in Maryland society. Historians have begun to question the interpretation that Southern women were restricted to the home as housewives and mothers.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigrant Housing and Unemployment Rights in NC During COVID-19
    Immigrant Housing and Unemployment Rights in NC during COVID-19 April 15, 2020 Webinar Items Zoom Essential tools All incoming attendees are automatically muted upon entry into the webinar Please submit your questions to the panelists by clicking the icon Q & A icon located in your zoom tool bar Upvote submitted questions for answer by clicking the thumbs up below each question asked Thank you and enjoy today’s webinar! 2 Webinar Agenda Immigrant Housing and Unemployment Rights in NC Topic Presenter Welcome/Introduction Daniel Valdez, Hispanic Federation North Carolina Department of Justice Jasmine McGhee, NC Department Update of Justice NC Housing Coalition & Pisgah Legal Robin Merrell, Ben Many, and Update Shoshana Fried Sharon Dove & Juan Hernandez, Housing – COVID-19 related Charlotte Center for Legal developments Advocacy UI – Application process, COVID-19 Ed Byron & Elizabeth Garcia, changes, public charge and Immigrant Charlotte Center for Legal eligibility Advocacy Q & A / Wrap Up Daniel Valdez, Hispanic Federation 3 DANIEL VALDEZ HISPANIC FEDERATION DIRECTOR OF NC & MID-SOUTH OPERATIONS Hispanic Federation Who we are Hispanic Federation (HF) is the nation’s premier Latino nonprofit membership organization. Founded in 1990, HF seeks to empower and advance the Hispanic community, support Hispanic families, and strengthen Latino institutions through work in the areas of education, health, immigration, civic engagement, economic empowerment, & the environment. 5 Our services Membership services to fortify our members through capacity-building
    [Show full text]
  • FAMILY INDEPENDENCE ADMINISTRATION Seth W
    FAMILY INDEPENDENCE ADMINISTRATION Seth W. Diamond, Executive Deputy Commissioner James K. Whelan, Deputy Commissioner Lisa C. Fitzpatrick, Assistant Deputy Commissioner Policy, Procedures and Training Office of Procedures POLICY BULLETIN #07-12-OPE REVISIONS TO FORMS Date: Subtopic(s): January 26, 2007 Forms This procedure can The purpose of this policy bulletin is to inform all Job Center staff that now be accessed on the revisions have been made to the following forms: FIAweb. • Utility Guarantee (M-858d) • Landlord Agreement (W-146V) • Nonmandatory Appointment Notice for Full-Time Employed Participants (W-500D) • Notice of Appointment to Reestablish Eligibility (W-531V) Revisions have been made to comply with new standards and reflect changes in job titles, logo size and overall layout. Each form was revised to include the “LLF” designation in the header to indicate that the form meets Local Law 73 requirements. Specific changes to the forms are detailed below. This policy bulletin serves as information for all other staff. Additional changes: M-858d • The title “Eligibility Specialist” below the signature line was replaced by “JOS/Worker.” • A signature line was added on the second page under “Participant’s Acknowledgement of Utility Guarantee.” HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS PROCEDURE? Call 718-557-1313 then press 2 at the prompt followed by 765 or send an e-mail to FIA Call Center Distribution: X PB #07-12-OPE W-146V • The title “Eligibility Specialist” in the first section was replaced by “JOS/Worker.” • The Spanish version has been made a separate form. W-500D • The “Expiration Date” field was removed from the upper right corner.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Safety
    PUBLIC SAFETY 010 In Review 2 Part I crime in Greenbelt decreased 6.8% in 2010, from 1,396 reported incidents in 2009 to 1,300. Part I crimes are defined as murder, rape, robbery, assault, burglary, theft and auto theft. By comparison, the Washington Metropolitan region of Montgomery and Prince George’s counties, known as UCR Region IV, experienced a 10.5% decrease in 2009, according to the latest published Maryland State Police Uniform Crime Report (May 10, 2010). Violent crimes of murder, rape, robbery and aggravated assault involve the element of personal confrontation between the perpetrator and the victim; consequently they are considered more serious crimes than property crimes because of their very nature. These offenses accounted for 16% of all crime in Maryland. For Greenbelt, violent crime comprised 14% of all Part I crimes indicating that Greenbelt falls in line with statewide violent crime trends. Crimes against persons, at 185, were the lowest since 2004, driven by a 17% decline in robbery, 106 reported incidents. Robbery remains the most prevalent violent crime in our community, accounting for 57% of all personal crime. Sixty- six (66) robberies occurred in Greenbelt West (62.2%), twenty-nine (29) in Greenbelt East (27.3%) and eleven (11) in historic Greenbelt (10.3%). The number of property crimes reported during 2010 (1,115) was over six times greater than the number of violent crimes. As a group, property crime made up 86% of the total crimes in 2010. Property crimes decreased 7% overall. Notably, motor vehicle theft (133) declined 25%. Geographically, 51% of crime occurred in Greenbelt West, 35% in Greenbelt East and 14% in historic Greenbelt.
    [Show full text]
  • INFORMATION to USERS the Most Advanced Technology Has Been
    INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photo­ graph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are re­ produced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. These are also available as one exposure on a standard 35mm slide or as a 17" x 23" black and white photographic print for an additional charge. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI University Microfilms international A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 Nortfi Zeeb Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Spillovers and Long-Run Effects of Messages on Tax Compliance: Experimental Evidence from Peru
    DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 13974 Spillovers and Long-Run Effects of Messages on Tax Compliance: Experimental Evidence from Peru Juan Francisco Castro Daniel Velásquez Arlette Beltrán Gustavo Yamada DECEMBER 2020 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 13974 Spillovers and Long-Run Effects of Messages on Tax Compliance: Experimental Evidence from Peru Juan Francisco Castro Arlette Beltrán Universidad del Pacífico Universidad del Pacífico Daniel Velásquez Gustavo Yamada University of Michigan Universidad del Pacífico and IZA DECEMBER 2020 Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but IZA takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The IZA Institute of Labor Economics is an independent economic research institute that conducts research in labor economics and offers evidence-based policy advice on labor market issues. Supported by the Deutsche Post Foundation, IZA runs the world’s largest network of economists, whose research aims to provide answers to the global labor market challenges of our time. Our key objective is to build bridges between academic research, policymakers and society. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author. ISSN: 2365-9793 IZA – Institute of Labor Economics Schaumburg-Lippe-Straße 5–9 Phone: +49-228-3894-0 53113 Bonn, Germany Email: [email protected] www.iza.org IZA DP No.
    [Show full text]
  • Hooray for Health Arthur Curriculum
    Reviewed by the American Academy of Pediatrics HHoooorraayy ffoorr HHeeaalltthh!! Open Wide! Head Lice Advice Eat Well. Stay Fit. Dealing with Feelings All About Asthma A Health Curriculum for Children IS PR O V IDE D B Y FUN D ING F O R ARTHUR Dear Educator: Libby’s® Juicy Juice® has been a proud sponsor of the award-winning PBS series ARTHUR® since its debut in 1996. Like ARTHUR, Libby’s Juicy Juice, premium 100% juice, is wholesome and loved by kids. Promoting good health has always been a priority for us and Juicy Juice can be a healthy part of any child’s balanced diet. Because we share the same commitment to helping children develop and maintain healthy lives, we applaud the efforts of PBS in producing quality educational television. Libby’s Juicy Juice hopes this health curriculum will be a valuable resource for teaching children how to eat well and stay healthy. Enjoy! Libby’s Juicy Juice ARTHUR Health Curriculum Contents Eat Well. Stay Fit.. 2 Open Wide! . 7 Dealing with Feelings . 12 Head Lice Advice . 17 All About Asthma . 22 Classroom Reproducibles. 30 Taping ARTHUR™ Shows . 32 ARTHUR Home Videos. 32 ARTHUR on the Web . 32 About This Guide Hooray for Health! is a health curriculum activity guide designed for teachers, after-school providers, and school nurses. It was developed by a team of health experts and early childhood educators. ARTHUR characters introduce five units exploring five distinct early childhood health themes: good nutrition and exercise (Eat Well. Stay Fit.), dental health (Open Wide!), emotions (Dealing with Feelings), head lice (Head Lice Advice), and asthma (All About Asthma).
    [Show full text]
  • TITLE Now Is the Time: an Action Agenda for Improvi% G Black and Minority Health in Maryland. the Final Report of the Maryland Governor's Commission on Black and Minority Health
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 326 585 UD 026 889 TITLE Now Is the Time: An Action Agenda for Improvi%g Black and Minority Health in Maryland. The Final Report of the Maryland Governor's Commission on Black and Minority Health. INSTITUTION Maryland Governor's Commission on Black and Minority Health, Baltimore.; Maryland State Dept. of Health and Mental Hygiene, Baltimore. PUB DATE Nov 87 NOTE 228p. AVAILABLE FROMMaryland Dept. of Health and Mental Hygiene, Policy and Health Statistics Administration, Division of Policy Analysis, 201 West Preston Street, Baltimore, MD 21201. PUB TYPE Reports - Research/Technical (243) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC10 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Blacks; Demography; *Health Needs; *Health Promotion; Health Services; Hearinas; Migrant Workers; *Minority Groups; Mortality Rate; Public Health; *Racial Differences; Refugees; State Surveys; Whites IDENTIFIERS *Access to Health Care; *Maryland ABSTRACT This document comprises a report on the disparity between the health status of Maryland's blacks and minorities and the white population. Information was gathered from statewide public hearings at which over 50 individuals and groups representing the general public and health care providers testified. The major finding was that a disproportionate number of black and minority Marylanders died needlessly between 1983 and 1985 from diseases, homicide, or accidents that were either preventable or controllable. Although Maryland has one of the best health care delivery systems in the nation, major improvements are needed if the health status
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 NSDUH, Supporting Statement Attachment M
    2015 NSDUH, Supporting Statement Attachment M – Screening Questions 2015 NATIONAL SURVEY ON DRUG USE AND HEALTH SCREENING APPLICATION SPECIFICATIONS Contract No. HHSS283201300001C RTI Project No. 0213984 Authors: Project Director: Patty LeBaron Gretchen McHenry Tennyson Chen Tom Virag Prepared for: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Rockville, MD 20857 Prepared by: RTI International January 2014 2015 NATIONAL SURVEY ON DRUG USE AND HEALTH SCREENING APPLICATION SPECIFICATIONS Contract No. HHSS283201300001C RTI Project No. 0213984 Authors: Project Director: Patty LeBaron Gretchen McHenry Tennyson Chen Tom Virag Prepared for: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Rockville, MD 20857 Prepared by: RTI International January 2014 2015 NATIONAL SURVEY ON DRUG USE AND HEALTH SCREENING APPLICATION UPDATES The following updates have been made to the 2015 NSDUH Screening Application: • As necessary, dates were updated in the screening program. • Response options in the Spanish screener have been translated into Spanish. • Interviewer Debriefing items were edited. Table of Contents Screening Application Updates ........................................................................................................ i Section Page 1. HU Screening, English ....................................................................................................... 1-1 2. HU Screening, Spanish ...................................................................................................... 2-1 3. GQU Screening,
    [Show full text]
  • Public Safety
    PUBLIC SAFETY 011 In Review 2 Serious crime, or UCR Part I, decreased 27% in 2011, from 1,300 reported incidents to 947. Serious crimes are defined as murder, rape, robbery, assault, burglary, theft and auto theft. By comparison, the Washington Metropolitan region of Montgomery and Prince George’s counties, known as UCR Region IV, experienced a 7% decrease according to the latest published Maryland State Police Uniform Crime Report (July 20, 2011). Violent crimes of murder, rape and aggravated assault involve the element of personal confrontation between the perpetrator and the victim; consequently they are considered more serious crimes than property crimes because of their very nature. These offenses accounted for 16% of all crime in Maryland. For Greenbelt, violent crime comprised 14% of all Part I crimes indicating that Greenbelt falls in line with statewide violent crime trends. Crimes against persons declined 29.7% in 2011, from 185 incidents to 130. Robbery, having dropped 15% from 106 to 90, remains the most prevalent violent crime in our community accounting for 9.5% of all Part I crimes. Forty-six percent (42) of the robberies occurred in Greenbelt West, 36% (33) in Greenbelt East and 17% (15) in Historic Greenbelt. In Maryland, robbery accounted for 35% of violent crime and 6% of the Part I crime index. There were no homicides in 2011, after averaging one annually for the last five years. The number of property crimes (852) was nearly 9 times greater than the number of violent crimes. As a group, property crime made up 90% of the total crime index in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Million-Dollar NFT Sales Get Attention, but Don't Expect Them to Last
    Bulletin YOUR DAILY ENTERTAINMENT NEWS UPDATE MARCH 17, 2021 Page 1 of 23 INSIDE Million-Dollar NFT Sales Get Attention, But Don’t Expect Them to Last • Meet the Nonprofits Feeding Thousands of Out- BY MICAH SINGLETON Of-Work Touring Staff The $11.7 million price tag on 3LAU’s sale of 33 col- I think that overlooks the real opportunity here which lectible NFT — — versions of his is to build permanence and perpetual equity in media • How Ice Cream non-fungible token Can Help Make 3-year-old album, Ultraviolet, on Feb. 25 has become on the internet.” Sense of Streaming a beacon for the music industry over the past three NFTs allow the creator to set a perpetual royalty Royalties (Op-Ed) weeks. There’s clearly money to be made in digital during the “minting” creation process that will allow collectibles and now there’s a rush to break into the them to get paid for third-party sales, a feat not pos- • UMG Signs Expanded Licensing market. But artists beware: Exponential growth like sible with any current digital (or physical) good. The Deal with African this is not sustainable and many of the people who average royalty rate is set between 10–25% according Streaming Service were involved in NFTs early on do not expect these to Goens. That means NFTs can deliver artists lifetime Boomplay exorbitant sale prices to continue. royalties with every future sale. • HITS Act “I think it will be very difficult to replicate again,” Right now, the NFT market is booming thanks to Reintroduced in says 3LAU about his $11.7 million haul – an NFT rare sorts of collectors: millionaires — and some bil- Congress on Behalf record until digital artist Beeple sold a single piece lionaires — who made fortunes investing in crypto- of Struggling Music for $69 million on auction at Christie’s on March 11, currency in its infancy.
    [Show full text]
  • A Management Information and Program Evaluation System for the State of Maryland
    A Management Information And Program Evaluation System For The State of Maryland A REPORT TO THE GOVERNOR AND GENERAL ASSEMBLY GOVERNOR'S TASK FORCE ON MODERN MANAGEMENT in cooperation with The University of Maryland under the auspices of Title I of the Higher Education Assistance Act JANUARY 1989 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT |) STATE OFFICE BUILDING ^I^L^If89 301 WEST PRESTON STREET BALTIMORE. MARYLAND 21201 MARVIN MANDEL GOVERNOR March 11, 1969 MEMORANDUM To: Department Heads and Seminar Participants in the Management Information and Program Evaluation System From: John J. McCormick, Jr., Director Management Information Program Re: Report - "A Management Information and Program Evaluation System for the State of Maryland" The report on our efforts during the summer and fall is attached. In the front are some recommendations and review notes. I took as samples for the review notes several programs that were'done rather well^and which illustrate some typical types of questions which we hope will be raised by this effort. I appreciate the time and effort you all put in on this project and I hope to work with you again this year in a continuation of the program. Thank you. JJM/mch Attachment K* MANAGEMENT INFORMATION AND PROGRAM EVALUATION SYSTEM A Report to the Governor and General Assembly January, 1969 CONTENTS Page Number PROGRAM SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS i LETTER TO GOVERNOR ii REVIEW NOTES • . • ix DEPARTMENTAL PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONS Section Number Assessments and Taxation, Department of 1 Bank Commissioner, State 2 Board of Natural Resources
    [Show full text]