Download Ebook ^ Chieftain Main Battle Tank 1965-2003

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download Ebook ^ Chieftain Main Battle Tank 1965-2003

PUIAQKPNSFLN » Kindle » Chieftain Main Battle Tank 1965-2003 Download Book CHIEFTAIN MAIN BATTLE TANK 1965-2003 Osprey Publishing. Paperback. Book Condition: new. BRAND NEW, Chieftain Main Battle Tank 1965-2003, Simon Dunstan, Peter Sarson, The concept of the Main Battle Tank emerged from the Centurion Universal tank that was developed at the end of World War II. Development of its successor began as early as 1951. The Chieftain incorporated signicant innovations including a reclining driver position and two-piece ammunition for greater survivability. The tank entered service in 1967 and was the heaviest armed, armoured MBT within the... Read PDF Chieftain Main Battle Tank 1965-2003 Authored by Simon Dunstan, Peter Sarson Released at - Filesize: 6.78 MB Reviews This sort of ebook is everything and made me hunting ahead of time and more. I am quite late in start reading this one, but better then never. I found out this publication from my dad and i suggested this publication to discover. -- Judge Mills Good e-book and benecial one. it absolutely was writtern quite awlessly and benecial. I am delighted to explain how this is basically the very best ebook i have read through within my very own daily life and may be he greatest ebook for at any time. -- Prof. Leonardo Parker This kind of publication is every little thing and taught me to searching in advance plus more. I have got study and i am condent that i am going to going to go through yet again again down the road. I am just effortlessly could get a delight of reading a written pdf. -- Mrs. Bonita Kuphal TERMS | DMCA.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

List of Exhibits at IWM Duxford
List of exhibits at IWM Duxford Aircraft Airco/de Havilland DH9 (AS; IWM) de Havilland DH 82A Tiger Moth (Ex; Spectrum Leisure Airspeed Ambassador 2 (EX; DAS) Ltd/Classic Wings) Airspeed AS40 Oxford Mk 1 (AS; IWM) de Havilland DH 82A Tiger Moth (AS; IWM) Avro 683 Lancaster Mk X (AS; IWM) de Havilland DH 100 Vampire TII (BoB; IWM) Avro 698 Vulcan B2 (AS; IWM) Douglas Dakota C-47A (AAM; IWM) Avro Anson Mk 1 (AS; IWM) English Electric Canberra B2 (AS; IWM) Avro Canada CF-100 Mk 4B (AS; IWM) English Electric Lightning Mk I (AS; IWM) Avro Shackleton Mk 3 (EX; IWM) Fairchild A-10A Thunderbolt II ‘Warthog’ (AAM; USAF) Avro York C1 (AS; DAS) Fairchild Bolingbroke IVT (Bristol Blenheim) (A&S; Propshop BAC 167 Strikemaster Mk 80A (CiA; IWM) Ltd/ARC) BAC TSR-2 (AS; IWM) Fairey Firefly Mk I (FA; ARC) BAe Harrier GR3 (AS; IWM) Fairey Gannet ECM6 (AS4) (A&S; IWM) Beech D17S Staggerwing (FA; Patina Ltd/TFC) Fairey Swordfish Mk III (AS; IWM) Bell UH-1H (AAM; IWM) FMA IA-58A Pucará (Pucara) (CiA; IWM) Boeing B-17G Fortress (CiA; IWM) Focke Achgelis Fa-330 (A&S; IWM) Boeing B-17G Fortress Sally B (FA) (Ex; B-17 Preservation General Dynamics F-111E (AAM; USAF Museum) Ltd)* General Dynamics F-111F (cockpit capsule) (AAM; IWM) Boeing B-29A Superfortress (AAM; United States Navy) Gloster Javelin FAW9 (BoB; IWM) Boeing B-52D Stratofortress (AAM; IWM) Gloster Meteor F8 (BoB; IWM) BoeingStearman PT-17 Kaydet (AAM; IWM) Grumman F6F-5 Hellcat (FA; Patina Ltd/TFC) Branson/Lindstrand Balloon Capsule (Virgin Atlantic Flyer Grumman F8F-2P Bearcat (FA; Patina Ltd/TFC)
[Show full text]
France Historical AFV Register
France Historical AFV Register Armored Fighting Vehicles Preserved in France Updated 24 July 2016 Pierre-Olivier Buan Neil Baumgardner For the AFV Association 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................4 ALSACE.................................................................................................................5 Bas-Rhin / Lower Rhine (67)........................................................5 Haut-Rhin / Upper Rhine (68)......................................................10 AQUITAINE...........................................................................................................12 Dordogne (24) .............................................................................12 Gironde (33) ................................................................................13 Lot-et-Garonne (47).....................................................................14 AUVERGNE............................................................................................................15 Puy-de-Dôme (63)........................................................................15 BASSE-NORMANDIE / LOWER NORMANDY............................................................16 Calvados (14)...............................................................................16 Manche (50).................................................................................19 Orne (61).....................................................................................21
[Show full text]
MS Owen-Smith. Armoured Fighting Vehicle Casualties
J R Army Med Corps: first published as 10.1136/jramc-123-02-03 on 1 January 1977. Downloaded from J. roy. Army med. Cps. 1977. 123,65-76 ARMOURED FIGHTING VEHICLE CASUALTIES * Lieutenant-Colonel M. S. OWEN-SMITH, M.S., F.R.C.S. Professor of Surgery, Royal Army Medical College THE war between the Arabs and Israelis in October 1973 resulted in the most extensive tank battles since World War n. Indeed in one area involved they were claimed to be the most extensive in Military history, exceeding the 1600 tanks deployed at El Alamein. In.association with these battles some 830 Israeli tanks and about 1400 Arab tanks were destroyed. The Israelis have recorded data on the wounded from this war in a number of articles and presentations. The most striking figure is that just under 10 per cent of all injured suffered burns. Virtually all these burns occurred in Armoured Fighting Vehicle (A.F.V.) crews. The problems I want to discuss are: a. Does the total incidence of burns from major tank battles create a definite departure from previous experiences and must we, therefore, include this figure in pre- planning for conflict in N.W. Europe? . guest. Protected by copyright. b. Does the present range of anti-tank weapons pose a greater threat to tanks and, crew than those of 30 years ago? c. Is there such an entity as " The Anti-Tank Missile Burn Syndrome"? d. What medical lessons can we learn from this war that would benefit the treatment of war wounded in general, and A.F.V.
[Show full text]
Written Evidence Submitted by Mr David Lister and Mr Jason Barnes
(AVF0003) Written evidence submitted by Mr David Lister and Mr Jason Barnes 1. Synopsis 1.1. Defence is not a strategic afterthought. It is a fundamental responsibility of the government. Over recent years, many significant strategic capabilities have been severely reduced. Ostensibly, this is because of a reducing or changing strategic threat but the realities have been budgetary. 1.2. We are at a point where we need to regenerate them, which involves capitalising them realistically, or lose them forever. 1.3. A particular area of decline has been development of heavy armoured vehicles. Regeneration/recapitalisation would give the country credible armoured capabilities — something which, despite the developments in other areas of military technology, there remains a strong need for. It would also be a significant potential revenue generator for the UK. 2. About the authors 2.1. David Lister is a military historian and consultant on British armour to several large international companies. Over more than a decade of archival research, he has written several books on the subject of British Armoured Fighting Vehicle (AFV) and associated weapon development which span more than a century. His most recent book covers British MBT and AFV development, along with the weapons for these vehicles, during the period after WWII until the modern era. 2.2. Jason Barnes is a technology and strategy writer with close on 30 years of experience of writing on topics which include the military, maritime, advanced materials development and manufacture, automotive and connectivity. 2.3. The authors’ reason for submitting this evidence is to offer some insight into how we have arrived at our current crisis, what worked previously, what is now missing and the very real dangers of the ground we tread.
[Show full text]
Modern Battle Tanks
MODERN! BATTLE k r * m^&-:fl 'tWBH^s £%5»-^ a $ Oft > . — n*- ^*M. S»S Ll^MfiB bjfitai 'Si^. ~i • ^-^HflH Lf. O Q MODERN BATTLE TANKS Edited by Duncan Crow Published by ARCO PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. New York Published 1978 by Arco Publishing Company, Inc. 219 Park Avenue South, New York, N.Y. 10003 Copyright © 1978 PROFILE PUBLICATIONS LIMITED. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data MODERN BATTLE TANKS 1. Tanks (Military science) I. Crow, Duncan. UG446.5.M55 358'. 18 78-4192 ISBN 0-668-04650-3 pbk All rights reserved Printed in Spain by Heraclio Fournier, S.A. Vitoria Spain Contents PAGE Introduction by Duncan Crow Centurion VI Swiss Pz61 and Pz68 VII Vickers Battle Tank VII Japanese Type 61 and STB VIII Soviet Mediums T44, T54, T55 and T62 by Lt-Col Michael Norman, Royal Tank Regiment T44 2 T54 3 Water Crossing 9 Fighting at Night 10 T55 and T62 ... 12 Variants 12 Tactical Doctrine 15 The M48-M60 Series of Main Battle Tanks by Col Robert J. Icks, AUS (Retired) In Battle 19 M48 Development 22 M48 Description 24 Hybrids 26 The M60 32 The Shillelagh 32 The M60 Series 38 Chieftain and Leopard Main Battle Tanks by Lt-Col Michael Norman, Royal Tank Regiment Development Histories 41 Chieftain (FV4201) 41 Leopard Standard Panzer 52 Chieftain and Leopard Described 60 Later Developments by Duncan Crow ... 78 . S-Tank by R. M. Ogorkiewicz Origins of the Design 79 Preliminary Investigations 80 Component Development 81 Suspension and Steering 83 Armament System 87 Engine Installation 88 Probability of Survival 90 Pre-Production Vehicles 90 Production Model 96 Tactical performance .
[Show full text]
The Centurion Tank (Images of War)
A Centurion armoured recovery vehicle (ARV, FV4006) photographed during the liberation of Kuwait in 1990/91. The registration number (00ZR48) indicates that this vehicle was converted from a Mk 1 or Mk 2 Centurion gun tank dating from the immediate post-war years. Note the additional composite armour applied to the sides of the vehicle in the form of panels. (Tank Museum) First published in Great Britain in 2012 by PEN & SWORD MILITARY an imprint of Pen & Sword Books ltd, 47 Church Street, Barnsley, South yorkshire S70 2AS Copyright © Pat ware, 2012 ISBN 978 1 78159 011 9 eISBN 978 1 78337 828 9 A CIP record for this book is available from the British library. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. Typeset by CHIC GRAPHICS Printed and bound by CPI Group (UK) ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY Pen & Sword Books Ltd incorporates the Imprints of Pen & Sword Aviation, Pen & Sword Family History, Pen & Sword Maritime, Pen & Sword Military, Pen & Sword discovery, wharncliffe local History, wharncliffe True Crime, wharncliffe Transport, Pen & Sword Select, Pen & Sword Military Classics, leo Cooper, The Praetorian Press, Remember when, Seaforth Publishing and Frontline Publishing. For a complete list of Pen & Sword titles please contact Pen & Sword Books limited 47 Church Street, Barnsley, South yorkshire, S70 2AS, england E-mail: [email protected]
[Show full text]
The Tank of the 1970'S
The tank of the 1970's G. Soffer, Ph.D. Associote Professor Univ. of Daylon, Ohio There are two schools of thought concerning the British Chieftain that is the most controversial. tank of the future. The debates as to what When the British developed the blueprints for whould be preferred, fire power and maneuver- the production of a brand new tank to replace ability, or armor and defense for the crew still the Centurion, experts expected that Britain, an continues. The British prefer a powerful gun and advanced country in tank design, would produce heavy armor, in the tradition of the Centurion a new revolutionary tank based upon very pro- tank. The result is the new Chieftain tank. In the gressive ideas. However, when the new Chieftain last few years the number of tank-producing appeared, most were surprised. The new tank is countries has increased. Today there are approx- equipped with a 120 millimeter gun. In order to imately thirteen nations that could be catagorized stop its heavy backfiring, its weight was increased as tank-producers. The outcome is a variety of to 50 tons! This added weight of armor plates, combat tanks on the market. gives the crew greater defense against anti-tank missiles. However, this is a sharp departure from One can divide these tanks into major groups the new concept, whereby maneuverability and according to their weight. Tanks that weigh be- mobility are emphasized, rather than the defense tween thirty to forty tons include: the French for the crew. AMX-30, the German Leopard, the Russian ma- de T55 and T62, and the Swedish-S tank.
[Show full text]
ST 7-193, Tank Identification Handbook, 1982 Robert Bolin , Depositor University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected]
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Army Training Documents U.S. Department of Defense 1982 ST 7-193, Tank Identification Handbook, 1982 Robert Bolin , depositor University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usarmytrain Part of the Curriculum and Instruction Commons Bolin, Robert , depositor, "ST 7-193, Tank Identification Handbook, 1982" (1982). U.S. Army Training Documents. 6. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usarmytrain/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Defense at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in U.S. Army Training Documents by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. ST 7-193 FY 82 UNITED STATES ARMY TANK IDENTIFICATION HANDBOOK UNITED STATES ARM'Y INFANTRY SCHOOL FORT BENNING, GEORGIA This publication is provided for resident and nonresident instruction at the United States Army Infantry School only. It reflects the current thought of this School and conforms to published Department of the Army doctrine as closely as possible. Comments/recommendations concern- ing this special text, or the data presented therein, should b_e forwarded to: COnlmandant United States Army Infantry School ATTN: ATSH-I-V-D Fort Benning, Georgia 31905 £01' comment and forwarding to the responsible department. TANK IDENTIFICATION HANDBOOK TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Section I. GENERAL •• 0 ~ 0 e e * II I) •• & C ~ 6''' •• »0 .. liD ID ••••••• It. Q. fl.......... 1 II. TH I SIS A TAN K . ., 00 e G eo. e • 0 t} <$) 1\1 0 ., 0 • «I (II •• 4) " • 6 8 '" • c a 0 • II ...
[Show full text]
Download a PDF Version of These Scenarios for World
With the squadron commander’s Spartan burning furiously on the road next to the church and contact with regiment spotty due to jamming, Captain Moran realized it was up to him to decide when to break contact. They’d rehearsed doing this time and again during map exercises back in garrison. Yet even then, it had always been a tricky affair, with decisions based more on guesswork than a clear, concise assessment of the situation. Doing so under fire, with the Russians ready to pounce on them the second they realized the squadron was pulling out would be ‘interesting’. One mistake would be deadly. After a quick glance down at the map laid out on the roof of his Spartan, he decided 1 Troop would be the next to go. It was not only the most exposed, the lieutenant commanding it was, in his opinion, on the verge of cracking under the stress of probes by Russian infantry who were infesting the woods on the squadron’s left. If that troop was to stand any chance of escaping, 4 Troop’s Strikers would have to suppress the Russian tanks in the woods from its position in the village. “Right,” the 2IC murmured to himself under his breath. “Let’s see if we can make this…” The whine of incoming artillery caused the 2IC to drop down into the turret of his Scimitar, putting an end to both his mutterings and his preparations for the moment. When the war broke out, A Squadron of the 1st Queen’s SETTING UP Dragoon Guards was tasked with delaying the Soviet advance Lay out the terrain on a 6’ x 4’ (180cm x 120cm) table on Schellerten along the Midland Canal while the rest of as shown on the map on the following page.
[Show full text]
Single Service Procurement and the British Army's Main Battle Tank
Single Service Procurement and the British Army's Main Battle Tank Author Tatham, Peter, Taylor, Trevor Published 2014 Book Title Case Studies in Defence Procurement and Logistics Copyright Statement © 2014 Cambridge Academic. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the publisher’s website for further information. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/63083 Link to published version http://www.liverpoolacademic.com/lap.nsf/ BooksWeb/2F6F350EDA5C2CBB80257D1C0078F6E7!OpenDocument Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au -----·---- Single Service Procurement and the British Army's Main Battle Tank Dr. Peter Tatham and Prof. Trevor •raylol' Centre for Defence Acquisition, Cranfield University, DCMT Shrivenham. Introduction In November 1986, shortly after Vickers Defence Systems (VDS) had acquired the former Royal Ordnance Factory (ROF) in Leeds (for £11m), the company began work on the de.<ign and development of a new tank which, they proposed, would replace the ageing fleet of Centurions (dating from the 1960s) and also the newer ChaJienger Is (first ordered in 1978) which were both unreliable and had poor gunnery accuracy. The first nine turrets · were built (seven at Leeds and two at VDS' original factory in Newcastle) on a private venture basis prior to the issue of the Staff Requirement. The perceived requirement for a new Main Battle Tank (MBT) took place against the backdrop of the "Levene" reforms to UK defence procurement which placed a premium on achievement of value for money through competition and taut contract conditions. Al!hough in the pre-contract discussions VDS argued that there was a need to provide the new Heel of tanks quickly (to fill a capability gap), and that a single tender contract would safeguard employment (some 2000 jobs) at both Leeds and Newcastle, the company's reputation was poor having delivered unreliable tanks over budget and late in previous contracts.
[Show full text]
Origin Notes Afghanistan T-55 600 Soviet Union T-62 170 Soviet Union
A Quantity Country Type Origin Notes (Estimated) Afghanistan Soviet T-55 600 Union Soviet T-62 170 Union Algeria Soviet T-55 400 Union Soviet T-62 300 Union Soviet T-72 540 Union [1] T-90 180 Russia A strictly ceremonial force in maintained, however, a police force ensures Andorra that law and order are kept. France and Spain are responsible for defense. Angola Soviet T-55 200 Union Soviet T-62 50 Union Soviet T-72 50 Union Argentina Germany/ TAM 330 Medium tank Argentina Armenia Soviet T-55 180 Union Soviet T-72 210 Union Australia M1A1 United AIM 59 States Abrams Austria Leopard 114 Germany 2A4 Azerbaijan T-90 200 Russia Soviet T-72 636 Union B Quantity Country Type Origin Notes (Estimated) Bahrain United M60A3 180 States 1 Bangladesh Type 59 Tank currently going [2] Type 59 36 China through an upgrade programme to Type 59G Type 62 86 China Only 42 remains in service Type 185-Type-69II Mk.2G and 65 250 China 69/79 Type-69II tanks MBT 44 China 44 tanks added in 2012 2000 Belarus Soviet T-54 29 In storage. Union Mostly kept in storage. Soviet T-72B 1,465 Approximately +250 still in regular Union service. Soviet T-80 92 In storage. Union Belgium MBTs retired in favour of Piranha IIIs Bosnia and Soviet M-55 S 150 Herzegovina Union United M60A3 65 States AMX-30 55 France M-84 14 Yugoslavia [3] Brazil Two operational tanks with the EE-T1 2 Brazil Centro de Instrução de Blindados Osório of the Brazilian Army[4] M60A3 United 91 TTS States Leopard 127 Germany 1A1 Leopard 221 Germany 1A5 Bulgaria Soviet T-72 160 Union C Quantity Country Type Origin Notes (Estimated) Cambodia Soviet T-55 103 Union Type 59 200 China Canada Leopard C2 66 Germany 1A5 equivalent 2 20 2A6M leased from Germany, Leopard 40 Germany 20 2A4M upgraded from Leopard 2A6M/2A4M 2A4 stocks.[5] Leopard 80 Germany 2A4 with L55 gun[5] 2A4+ 15 Purchased from Germany as Leopard parts stock[6] 12 purchased from 27 Germany 2A4 Switzerland for use as Armored engineering vehicles's (AEV).
[Show full text]
The Iran-Iraq
XII. THE COMBINED ARMS AND THE LAND WAR 12.0 The Land War The Iran-Iraq War presents far more lessons about the problems of technology transfer, and converting Third World armies to effective mechanized forces that are capable of combined arms operations, than it does about weapons and technology. Neither Iraq or Iraq was ever able to exploit its land weapons to their full potential. In fact, both had serious problems in conducting effective offensive maneuvers during most of the war, and in achieving more than mediocre results with combined arms. While Iran was hurt by its lack of easy access to modern arms, and resupply for its Western made equipment, the major problems on both sides were their lack of organisation and training for modern war. This helps explain why force ratios had so little real impact on the outcome of the battle. The issue was rarely the total number of forces engaged, it was rather the comparative effectiveness of those force elements which could be directly engaged in combat. It also helps explain why Iran's human wave tactics could be effective in many instances against a massive Iraqi superiority in firepower. The general problems each army faced have been described in the historical analysis of the war, along with the problems Iran had in developing effective forces in the face of constant interference by its senior Mullahs, and that Iraq faced because of the initial politisation of its armed forces and the over-centralized of command authority under Saddam Hussein. While a detailed analysis of the key aspects of land performance does provide some additional insights, it is important to stress that the most important insights are into the strengths and limitations of Third World armies and not into the relative effectiveness of their weapons.
[Show full text]