Computational Social Science

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Computational Social Science SAGE BENCHMARKS IN SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODS COMPUTATIONAL SOCIAL SCIENCE VOLUME I Edited by Nigel Gilbert (DSAGE G- Los Angeles I London | New Delhi Singapore I Washington DC Contents Appendix of Sources xi Editor's Introduction: Computational Social Science Nigel Gilbert xxi Volume I Section A: An Introduction to Agent-based Modelling 1. Cellular Automata in the Social Sciences: Perspectives, Restrictions, and Artefacts 3 Rainer Hegselmann 2. The Computer as a Laboratory: Toward a Theory of Complex, Adaptive Systems 27 John L. Casti 3. Agent-based Computational Models and Generative Social Science 33 Joshua M. Epstein 4. Agent-based Modeling vs. Equation-based Modeling: A Case Study and Users' Guide 71 H. Van Dyke Parunak, Robert Savit and Rick L. Riolo 5. On Generating Hypotheses Using Computer Simulations 91 Kathleen M. Carley 6. Learning to Speculate: Experiments with Artificial and Real Agents 107 John Duffy 7. Why Agents? On the Varied Motivations for Agent Computing in the Social Sciences 131 Robert L. Axtell Section B: Precursors and Early Work 8. Dynamic Models of Segregation 159 Thomas C. Schelling 9. A Monte Carlo Approach to Diffusion 207 Torsten Hagerstrand 10. The Checkerboard Model of Social Interaction 229 James M. Sakoda 11. Flocks, Herds, and Schools: A Distributed Behavioral Model 245 Craig W. Reynolds 12. A Computer Simulation Model of Community Referendum Controversies 267 Robert P. Abelson and Alex Bernstein vi Contents Section C: Agent-based Computational Economics 13. Artificial Adaptive Agents in Economic Theory 297 John H. Holland and John H. Miller 14. Modeling Macroeconomies as Open-ended Dynamic Systems of Interacting Agents 307 Blake LeBaron and Leigh Tesfatsion 15. Evolving Market Structure: An ACE Model of Price Dispersion and Loyalty 315 Alan P. Kirman and Nicolaas J. Vriend 16. Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-in by Historical Events 357 W. Brian Arthur 17. Artificial Worlds and Economics, Part II 375 David A Lane 18. Why Are We Simulating Anyway? Some Answers from Economics 399 Edmund Chattoe 19. Why Are Economists Sceptical about Agent-based Simulations? 425 Roberto Leombruni and Matteo Richiardi Volume II Section D: Modelling Sociality 20. The Emergence of Computational Sociology 3 Norman P. Hummon and Thomas J. Fararo 21. Modeling Sociality: The View from Europe 13 Nigel Gilbert 22. From Factors to Actors: Computational Sociology and Agent-based Modeling 29 Michael W. Macy and Robert Wilier 23. Symbolic Interactionist Modeling: The Coevolution of Symbols and Institutions 55 Deborah Vakas Duong 24. The Standing Ovation Problem 65 John H. Miller and Scott E. Page Section E: Opinion Dynamics 25. Towards a Theory of Collective Phenomena: Consensus and Attitude Changes in Groups 85 Serge Galam and Serge Moscovici 26. Opinion Evolution in Closed Community 115 Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron and Jozef Sznajd 27. Persuasion Dynamics 125 Gerard Weisbuch, Guillaume Deffuant and Frederic Amblard Contents vii 28. The "New" Science of Networks 147 Duncan J. Watts 29. The Structure of Scientific Collaboration Networks 175 M.E.J. Newman Section F: Social Dilemmas 30. Agent-based Simulation in the Study of Social Dilemmas 191 N.M. Gotts, J.G. Polhill andAN.R. Law 31. Learning, Signaling, and Social Preferences in Public-Good Games 275 Marco A. Janssen and T.K. Ahn 32. Nucleus and Shield: The Evolution of Social Structure in the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma 311 Bj0rn Lomborg Volume III Section G: Cooperation 33. Evolving Specialisation, Altruism, and Group-level Optimisation Using Tags 3 David Hales 34. The Evolution of Ethnocentrism 13 Ross A. Hammond and Robert Axelrod 35. An Evolutionary Approach to Norms 25 Robert Axelrod 36. The Emperor's Dilemma: A Computational Model of Self-enforcing Norms 47 Damon Centola, Robb Wilier and Michael Macy 37. The Emergence of Classes in a Multi-Agent Bargaining Model 77 Robert L. Axtell, Joshua M. Epstein and H. Peyton Young 38. The Evolution of Communication Systems by Adaptive Agents 95 Luc Steels Section H: Emergence 39. Computational Models of Emergent Properties 115 John Symons 40. Artificial Societies: Multiagent Systems and the Micro-Macro Link in Sociological Theory 133 R. Keith Sawyer 41. Varieties of Emergence 165 N. Gilbert 42. Emergent Properties of Balinese Water Temple Networks: Coadaptation on a Rugged Fitness Landscape 175 J. Stephen Lansing and James N. Kremer viii Contents Section I: Applications 43. Multi-Agent Systems for the Simulation of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: A Review 199 Dawn C. Parker, Steven M. Manson, Marco A Janssen, Matthew J. Hoffmann and Peter Deadman 44. Simulating Fishermen's Society 241 F. Bousquet, C. Cambier, C. Mullon, P. Morand and J. Quensiere 45. Understanding the Functions of Norms in Social Groups through Simulation 261 Rosaria Conte and Cristiano Castelfranchi 46. Population Growth and Collapse in a Multiagent Model of the Kayenta Anasazi in Long House Valley 277 Robert L. Axtell, Joshua M. Epstein, Jeffrey S. Dean, George J. Gumerman, Alan C. Swedlund, Jason Harburger, Shubha Chakravarty, Ross Hammond, Jon Parker and Miles Parker 47. The EOS Project: Integrating Two Models of Palaeolithic Social Change 287 Jim Doran and Mike Palmer 48. The "Wedding-Ring": An Agent-based Marriage Model Based on Social Interaction 309 Francesco C. Billari, Alexia Prskawetz, Belinda Aparicio Diaz and Thomas Fent Volume IV Section J: Cognition 49. Cognitive Science Meets Multi-Agent Systems: A Prolegomenon 3 Ron Sun 50. Modeling Rational Agents within a BDI-Architecture 31 Anand S. Rao and Michael P. Georgeff 51. Multi-Agent Modelling and Renewable Resources Issues: The Relevance of Shared Representations for Interacting Agents 55 J. Rouchier, F. Bousquet, O. Barreteau, C. Le Page andJ.-L. Bonnefoy 52. Fashions, Habits and Changing Preferences: Simulation of Psychological Factors Affecting Market Dynamics 75 Marco A Janssen and Wander Jager Section K: Organisations 53. A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice 101 Michael D. Cohen, James G. March and Johan P. Olsen 54. Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning 135 James G. March 55. Multi-Agent Dependence by Dependence Graphs 155 Jaime Simao Sichman and Rosaria Conte Contents ix 56. Multi-Agent Systems and Role Games: Collective Learning Processes for Ecosystem Management 175 Francois Bousquet, Olivier Barreteau, Patrick d'Aquino, Michel Etienne, Stanislas Boissau, Sigried Aubert, Christophe Le Page, Didier Babin and Jean-Christophe Castella Section L: Methodology 57. Advancing the Art of Simulation in the Social Sciences: Obtaining, Analyzing, and Sharing Results of Computer Models 215 Robert Axelrod 58. How to Build and Use Agent-based Models in Social Science 229 Nigel Gilbert and Pietro Terna 59. Agent-based Modelling - A Methodology for the Analysis of Qualitative Development Processes 247 Andreas Pyka and Thomas Grebel 60. From KISS to KIDS - An Anti-simplistic' Modelling Approach 267 Bruce Edmonds and Scott Moss 61. Agent-based Simulation Platforms: Review and Development Recommendations 285 Steven F. Railsback, Steven L. Lytinen and Stephen K. Jackson 62. Verification, Validation, and Testing 313 Osman Balci 63. Sociology and Simulation: Statistical and Qualitative Cross-validation 383 Scott Moss arid Bruce Edmonds 64. Aligning Simulation Models: A Case Study and Results 415 Robert Axtell, Robert Axelrod, Joshua M. Epstein and Michael D. Cohen 65. A Standard Protocol for Describing Individual-based and Agent-based Models 437 Volker Grimm, Uta Berger, Finn Bastiansen, Sigrunn Eliassen, Vincent Ginot, Jarl Giske, John Goss-Custard, Tamara Grand, Simone K. Heinz, Geir Huse, Andreas Huth, Jane U. Jepsen, Christian J0rgensen, WolfM. Mooij, Birgit Miiller, Guy Pe'er, Cyril Piou, Steven F. Railsback, Andrew M. Robbins, Martha M. Robbins, Eva Rossmanith, Nadja Rilger, Espen Strand, Sami Souissi, Richard A. Stillman, Rune Vab0, Ute Visser and Donald L. DeAngelis 66. A Common Protocol for Agent-based Social Simulation 461 Matteo Richiardi, Roberto Leombruni, Nicole Saam and Michele Sonnessa .
Recommended publications
  • Varieties of Emergence
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228792799 Varieties of emergence Article · January 2002 CITATIONS READS 37 94 1 author: Nigel Gilbert University of Surrey 364 PUBLICATIONS 9,427 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Consumer Behavior View project Agent-based Macroeconomic Models: An Anatomical Review View project All content following this page was uploaded by Nigel Gilbert on 19 May 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. 1 VARIETIES OF EMERGENCE N. GILBERT, University of Surrey, UK* ABSTRACT** The simulation of social agents has grown to be an innovative and powerful research methodology. The challenge is to develop models that are computationally precise, yet are linked closely to and are illuminating about social and behavioral theory. The social element of social simulation models derives partly from their ability to exhibit emergent features. In this paper, we illustrate the varieties of emergence by developing Schelling’s model of residential segregation (using it as a case study), considering what might be needed to take account of the effects of residential segregation on residents and others; the social recognition of spatially segregated zones; and the construction of categories of ethnicity. We conclude that while the existence of emergent phenomena is a necessary condition for models of social agents, this poses a methodological problem for those using simulation to investigate social phenomena. INTRODUCTION Emergence is an essential characteristic of social simulation. Indeed, without emergence, it might be argued that a simulation is not a social simulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigel Gilbert the Middle
    Simulating social phenomena: the middle way Nigel Gilbert University of Surrey Guildford UK http://cress.soc.surrey.ac.uk Centre for Research in Social Simulation Thursday, June 24, 2010 1 Agents • Distinct parts of a computer program, each of which represents a social actor • Agents may model any actors – Individuals – Firms – Nations – etc. • Properties of agents ✦ Perception ✦ Performance ✦ Policy ✦ Memory 2 Centre for Research in Social Simulation Thursday, June 24, 2010 2 Interaction • Agents are not isolated • Information passed from one agent to another ✦ (coded) Messages ✦ Direct transfer of Knowledge ✦ By-products of action e.g. chemical trails or pheromones ✦ Etc. 3 Centre for Research in Social Simulation Thursday, June 24, 2010 3 Environment • Options: ✦ Geographic space ✦ Analogues to space e.g. knowledge space ✦ Network (links, but no position) • The environment provides ✦ Resources ✦ Communication 4 Centre for Research in Social Simulation Thursday, June 24, 2010 4 An example: modelling the housing market • Hugely important to national economies ✦ in UK, NL, ES, US etc. • Housing in these countries is a major component of personal wealth, as well as just a place to live ✦ affecting consumption, inheritance, mobility etc. • A special market ✦ location important ✦ infrequent purchase ✦ many parties • buyer, seller, • estate agent/realtor, • bank 5 Centre for Research in Social Simulation Thursday, June 24, 2010 5 Previous work IV – Outlook for the UK housing market Introduction Figure 4.1 - Average UK house price 1974Q1-2007Q3 Average UK house price (£) • Mostly econometric models Housing continues to be the UK economy’s 200000 most valuable asset by far. Housing was 180000 ✦ estimated by the Office for National 160000 Statistics to have a total value of £3.9 trillion used to produce quantitative house price 140000 at the end of 2006, equivalent to 60% of the 120000 total value of all UK assets (valued at some 100000 projections £6.5 trillion).
    [Show full text]
  • Resume Nigel Gilbert Sociology, University of Surrey
    Resume Nigel Gilbert Sociology, University of Surrey Professor Nigel Gilbert is Professor of Sociology at the University of Surrey. He has an international reputation as a pioneer in the use of computer simulation in the social sciences and is the author of the principal textbook in that field and many research papers. He is immediate past President of the European Social Simulation Association and founder-editor of the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation. He has held a personal Chair at Surrey since 1991. From 1997 to 2005, Professor Gilbert was a Pro Vice-Chancellor of the University of Surrey, apart-time post. He had strategic responsibility for staffing matters and was a member of thesenior management team of the University, a chartered institution with a turnover approaching £150 million and 13,000 students. His research interests encompass the sociology of scientific knowledge (understanding howscientists generate reliable knowledge), science policy (strategies for the management of science),and the sociology of the environment, including the management of natural resources such as water. He has written extensively in these areas and is the editor of one of the textbooks on sociological research methods most widely used in UK universities. He has a first degree in Engineering Science from Cambridge. Since graduation, he has aimed to link engineering and the social sciences and his work was honoured with election as a Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering in 1999. He is still the only practicing social scientist to be a Fellow of the Royal Academy. He was President of the Engineering Section of the British Association for the Advancement of Science in 2005 and is at present leading a policy group for the Royal Academy on privacy and surveillance.
    [Show full text]
  • The 20Th International Workshop on Multi-Agent-Based Simulation
    The 20th International Workshop on Multi-Agent-Based Simulation MABS 2019 Montreal, Canada May 13, 2019 PROGRAM CHAIRS • Jaime Simão Sichman (University of São Paulo, Brazil) • Mario Paolucci (ISTC, Italy) • Harko Verhagen (Stockholm University, Sweden) THE MABS STEERING COMMITTEE • Frédéric Amblard (University of Toulouse, France) • Luis Antunes (University of Lisbon, Portugal) • Paul Davidsson (Malmö University, Sweden) • Nigel Gilbert (University of Surrey, UK) • Tim Gulden (George Mason University, USA) • Emma Norling (Manchester Metropolitan University, UK) • Mario Paolucci (National Research Council, Italy) • Jaime Simão Sichman (University of São Paulo, Brazil) • Takao Terano (Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan) PROGRAM COMMITTEE • Diana Adamatti (FURG, Brazil) • Frederic Amblard (Université Toulouse 1, France) • Luis Antunes (University of Lisbon, Portugal) • Tina Balke (Vanderlande Industries, The Netherlands) • Joao Balsa (University of Lisbon, Portugal) • Federico Bianchi (University of Brescia, Italy) • Cristiano Castelfranchi (ISTC-CNR, Italy) • Sung-Bae Cho (Yonsei University, Korea) • Paul Davidsson (Malmö University, Sweden) • Frank Dignum (Utrecht University, the Netherlands) • Graçaliz Pereira Dimuro (FURG, Brazil) • Bruce Edmonds (Centre for Policy Modelling, UK) • Francisco Grimaldo (University of Valencia, Spain) • Laszlo Gulyas (University of Budapest, Hungary) • Rainer Hegselmann (University of Bayreuth, Germany) • Marco Janssen (Arizona State University, USA) • Jean-Pierre Muller (CIRAD, France) • Luis Gustavo
    [Show full text]
  • Aviso De Conferencia
    AAVISO DE CCONFERENCIA QLectives: evolving software to support quality Prof. Nigel Gilbert. Centre for Research in Social Simulation, University of Surrey (United Kingdom) Facultad de Informática Aula 14 6 de junio de 2012 16: 30 entrada libre hasta completar el aforo resumen: In this talk, I'll summarise current progress in the FP7 Integrated Project, QLectives, which aims to develop software that will assist collectives (e.g. scientific specialties, photo-sharing groups, political activist groups) self-organise into communities that support the distribution of high quality self-generated content. The project starts from a complexity science theoretical perspective and aims to build tools that are fully distributed, preserve privacy and require no central control or authority. Some of the challenges of running such an inter-disciplinary endeavour with ambitious and possibly unattainable goals will be described, as well as the directions in which the project is going and what we expect to produce by the end of the project in one year's time. sobre Niger Gilbert: Nigel Gilbert is Professor of Sociology at the University of Surrey, with an interdisciplinary background in Engineering and Social Sciences. He is Director of the Centre for Research on Simulation in the Social Sciences (CRESS), Director of the Institute of Advanced Studies and founder and Editor of the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, main journal in the field. He has directed or participated in multiple European Projects (IMAGES, SEIN, FIRMA, SIMWEB, EMIL, NEMO, NEWTIES, PATRES, etc). He is a Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering, Fellow of the British Computer Society, the Royal Society of Arts, and the Academy of the Social Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulation for the Social Scientist
    GilbertTroit005pb17.5.qxd 1/27/2007 10:52 AM Page 1 second second edition edition Simulation for the Social Scientist SIMULATION FOR THE SOCIAL SCIENTIST Simulation Second Edition • What can computer simulation contribute to the social sciences? • Which of the many approaches to simulation would be best for my social science project? for the • How do I design, carry out and analyse the results from a computer simulation? Interest in social simulation has been growing rapidly worldwide as a result of increasingly powerful hardware and software and a rising interest in the Social application of ideas of complexity, evolution, adaptation and chaos in the social sciences. Simulation for the Social Scientist is a practical textbook on the techniques of building computer simulations to assist understanding of social and economic issues and problems. Scientist This authoritative book details all the common approaches to social simulation to provide social scientists with an appreciation of the literature and allow those with some programming skills to create their own simulations. New for this edition: • A new chapter on designing multi-agent systems to support the fact that multi-agent modelling has become the most common approach to simulation • New examples and guides to current software • Updated throughout to take new approaches into account The book is an essential tool for social scientists in a wide range of fields, particularly sociology, economics, anthropology, geography, organizational theory, political science, social policy, cognitive psychology and cognitive science. It will also appeal to computer scientists interested in distributed artificial intelligence, multi-agent systems and agent technologies. Gilbert • Troitzsch Nigel Gilbert is Professor of Sociology at the University of Surrey, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Expertise As an Object: an Ontological Study of Cryptology Research in the United Kingdom from 1970 to 2000
    UNIVERSITY OF SURREY Expertise as an Object: An Ontological Study of Cryptology Research in the United Kingdom from 1970 to 2000 by Richard Fletcher Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Arts and Human Sciences Department of Sociology Supervisors: Dr Christine Hine and Dr Nicola Green ©Richard Fletcher Words: 95,698 Declaration of Authorship This thesis and the work to which it refers are the results of my own efforts. Any ideas, data, images or text resulting from the work of others (whether published or unpublished) are fully identified as such within the work and attributed to their originator in the text, bibliography or in footnotes. This thesis has not been submitted in whole or in part for any other academic degree or professional qualification. I agree that the University has the right to submit my work to the plagiarism detection service TurnitinUK for originality checks. Whether or not drafts have been so-assessed, the University reserves the right to require an electronic version of the final document (as submitted) for assessment as above. Signature: Date: i \Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" Juvenal (Satire VI, lines 347-8) Abstract Recent research carried out under the `third wave of science studies' has produced robust categories of expertise, and has developed normative ideas about how it should be used during controversies over technological decision-making. Though separate in the literature, third wave ideas about contributory expertise appear to be compatible with the recent `turn to ontology'. Both sets of ideas focus on what it is that practices are able to produce, and consider the results of those practices to be real.
    [Show full text]
  • 6Th Conference of the European Social Simulation Association
    6th Conference of the European Social Simulation Association (ESSA 2009) Guildford, United Kingdom 14-18 September 2009 Editors: Bruce Edmonds Nigel Gilbert ISBN: 978-1-63439-623-3 Printed from e-media with permission by: Curran Associates, Inc. 57 Morehouse Lane Red Hook, NY 12571 Some format issues inherent in the e-media version may also appear in this print version. Copyright© (2009) by the European Social Simulation Association (ESSA) All rights reserved. Printed by Curran Associates, Inc. (2015) For permission requests, please contact the European Social Simulation Association (ESSA) at the address below. European Social Simulation Association (ESSA) c/o University of Surrey GU2 7XH United Kingdom Phone: +441483300800 [email protected] Additional copies of this publication are available from: Curran Associates, Inc. 57 Morehouse Lane Red Hook, NY 12571 USA Phone: 845-758-0400 Fax: 845-758-2634 Email: [email protected] Web: www.proceedings.com Table of Contents Invited Talks The Creativity of the Evolution of Technology Is a Target for Social Simulation Efforts ....................................................... N/A Mark Bedau Does ABSS need Cognitive Agents that are Multiple Agent Systems? .......... 1 Jim Doran Generative Archaeology: How even really simple models can help in understanding the past .................................................. 2 Tim Kohler Plenary Presentations The Simplicity of Cooperation: Conditional movement rules promote cooperation 3 C. Athena Aktipis, John W. Pepper A General, Evolutionary Model of Long Tailed Distributions in the Social Sciences ............................................................... 13 Alexander Bentley, Paul Omerod, Michael Batty The Evolution of Institutions for Commons Management: An agent-based model ................................................................. 28 Giangiacomo Bravo Simulating “Stage” Theories: An exploration with applications ..............
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Sociology
    Emergence and social dynamics Nigel Gilbert University of Surrey [email protected] cress.soc.surrey.ac.uk Friday, April 3, 2009 1 Overview Computational social science Agent-based models Emergence in sociology Types of emergence An example The implications cress.soc.surrey.ac.uk 2 Friday, April 3, 2009 2 What is computational social science? • Models ✦ Programs as models • Mechanisms ✦ Realist accounts of the way the social world works • Experiments ✦ Experimenting on the model, as a second best to experimenting on the social world cress.soc.surrey.ac.uk 3 Friday, April 3, 2009 3 Example: Market • Many agents trading with each other • Each trying to maximise its own welfare • Neo-classical economics assumes that markets are at equilibrium, where the price is such that supply equals demand • But with a cellular automata, we can model markets in which the price varies between localities according to local supply and demand cress.soc.surrey.ac.uk 4 Friday, April 3, 2009 4 Example: Sugarscape • Agents located on a grid of cells • Trade with local neighbours • Two commodities: sugar and spice. All agents consume both these, but at different rates • Each agent has its own welfare function, relating its relative preference for sugar or spice to the amount it has ‘in stock’ and the amount it needs • Agents trade at a price negotiated between them when both would gain in welfare cress.soc.surrey.ac.uk 5 Friday, April 3, 2009 5 Example: Sugarscape cress.soc.surrey.ac.uk 6 Friday, April 3, 2009 6 Results • The expected market clearing price emerges from the many bilateral trades (but with some remaining variations) • The quantity of trade is less than that predicted by neoclassical theory ✦ since agents are unable to trade with others than their neighbours • And..
    [Show full text]
  • Petra Ahrweiler and Nigel Gilbert: Caffè Nero 10/30/2005 12:11 PM
    Petra Ahrweiler and Nigel Gilbert: Caffè Nero 10/30/2005 12:11 PM ©Copyright JASSS Petra Ahrweiler and Nigel Gilbert (2005) Caffè Nero: the Evaluation of Social Simulation Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 8, no. 4 <http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/4/14.html> For information about citing this article, click here Received: 02-Oct-2005 Accepted: 02-Oct-2005 Published: 31-Oct-2005 Abstract This contribution deals with the assessment of the quality of a simulation by discussing and comparing "real-world" and scientific social simulations. We use the example of the Caffè Nero in Guildford as a 'real-world' simulation of a Venetian café. The construction of everyday simulations like Caffè Nero has some resemblance to the construction procedure of scientific social simulations. In both cases, we build models from a target by reducing the characteristics of the latter sufficiently for the purpose at hand; in each case, we want something from the model we cannot achieve easily from the target. After briefly discussing the 'ordinary' method of evaluating simulations called the 'standard view' and its adversary, a constructivist approach asserting that 'anything goes', we heed these similarities in the construction process and apply evaluation methods typically used for everyday simulations to scientific simulation and vice versa. The discussion shows that a 'user community view' creates the foundation for every evaluation approach: when evaluating the Caffè Nero simulation, we refer to the expert community (customers, owners) who use the simulation to get from it what they would expect to get from the target; similarly, for science, the foundation of every validity discussion is the ordinary everyday interaction that creates an area of shared meanings and expectations.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Agent-Based Models of Complex Health Behaviour T ⁎ Jennifer Badhama, , Edmund Chattoe-Brownb, Nigel Gilbertc, Zaid Chalabid, Frank Keea, Ruth F
    Health and Place 54 (2018) 170–177 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Health & Place journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/healthplace Developing agent-based models of complex health behaviour T ⁎ Jennifer Badhama, , Edmund Chattoe-Brownb, Nigel Gilbertc, Zaid Chalabid, Frank Keea, Ruth F. Huntera a UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Research Northern Ireland, Queen's University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Sciences Block B, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast BT12 6BA, United Kingdom b School of Media, Communication and Sociology, University of Leicester, Bankfield House, 132 New Walk, Leicester LE1 7JA, United Kingdom c Centre for Research in Social Simulation, Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, Guildford GU 2 7XH, United Kingdom d Department of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15–17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Managing non-communicable diseases requires policy makers to adopt a whole systems perspective that ade- Agent-based modelling quately represents the complex causal architecture of human behaviour. Agent-based modelling is a computa- Health behaviour tional method to understand the behaviour of complex systems by simulating the actions of entities within the Complex systems system, including the way these individuals influence and are influenced by their physical and social environ- Spatial modelling ment. The potential benefits of this method have led to several calls for greater use in public health research.We Modelling non-communicable diseases discuss three challenges facing potential modellers: model specification, obtaining required data, and developing good practices. We also present steps to assist researchers to meet these challenges and implement their agent- based model.
    [Show full text]
  • GILBERT IT and COMMUNICATIONS FBCS Freng DIRECTOR, CENTRE for RESEARCH on SIMULATION in the SOCIAL SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY of SURREY Modelling Societies
    PROFESSOR NIGEL GILBERT IT AND COMMUNICATIONS FBCS FREng DIRECTOR, CENTRE FOR RESEARCH ON SIMULATION IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF SURREY Modelling societies It is now possible to simulate on a computer the complex interactions between people, organisations and technology, and study how they evolve over time. Such ‘social simulation’ is being used to conduct experiments and test out theories that would be difficult, or impossible, to test in the real world. Nigel Gilbert explains how it all works and discusses some of the research that is currently underway. Introduction One way of exploring these issues dynamics are usually complex, that is growing in importance is to build meaning that at best only qualitative We know that collaborations between computer models that simulate the and coarse-grained predictions are universities and companies are situations in which we are interested. possible. The same applies to some important for innovation, but what kinds Researchers can then experiment with physical phenomena, such as of collaborations are most effective? the models, which is of course easier, turbulence. Nevertheless, modelling is How can the conflicting demands made quicker and involves fewer ethical and useful. It can allow one to gain a much for the water in Europe’s river basins by practical problems than experimenting deeper understanding of the factors individuals, farmers, water utilities, the with societies. that are important in a social setting, environment and transport be However, the simulations used by which policy ‘levers’ can make a reconciled? What is the most effective social scientists are fundamentally difference to outcomes and which are way of persuading farmers to manage different from most of those used in unlikely to do so.
    [Show full text]