DOCSLIB.ORG

References Cited in Patterson Et Al. 2007, Digital Distribution Maps Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

References Cited in Patterson et al. 2007, Digital Distribution Maps of the Mammals of the Western Hemisphere, Version 3.0 Acosta Lara, E. S., and J. I. Unoa. 1962. Quirópteros del Uruguay. Comunicaciones Zoologicas del Museo de Historia Natural de Montevideo 7:1-15. Adam, P. J. 1999. Choloepus didactylus. Mammalian Species 621:1-8. Adams, J. K. 1989. Pteronotus davyi. Mammaliam Species, 346: 1-5. Aellen, V. 1965. Sur une petite collection des chiropteres du nord-ouest du Perou. Mammalia 29:563-571. Aguiar, L. M. S., M. Zortea, and V. A. Taddei. 1995. New records of bats for the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Mammalia 59:667-671. Aguirre, L. F. and R. J. de Urioste. 1994. Nuevos registros de murciélagos para Bolivia y los Departamentos de Beni y Pando. Ecología en Bolivia 23:71-76. Alberico, M. S. 1990. Systematics and distribution of the genus Platyrrhinus (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) in northwestern South America, Pages 345-354 in G. Peters, and R. Hutterer, eds. Vertebrates in the tropics: Proceedings of the international symposium on vertebrate biogeography and systematics in the tropics, Bonn, June 5-8, 1989. Bonn, Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig. Alberico, M., A. Cadena, J. Hernández-Camacho, and Y. Muñoz-Saba. 2000. Mamíferos (Synapsida: Theria) de Colombia. Biota Colombiana. 1(1):43-75. Albuja V., L., and B. D. Patterson. 1996. A new species of northern shrew opossum (Paucituberculata: Caenolestidae) from the Cordillera del Condor, Ecuador. Journal of Mammalogy 77:41-53. Albuja, L. 1991. Lista de vertebrados del Ecuador. Escuela Politécnica XVI:163-203. Albuja, L. 1999. Murciélagos de Ecuador, 2da. edición, Cicetrónic Cía. Ltda. Offset. Quito Ecuador. 1 Alexander, L. F. 1996. A morphometric analysis of geographic variation within Sorex monticolus (Insectivora: Soricidae). University of Kansas Natural History Museum Miscellaneous Publication No. 88. Alvarez, J., M.R. Willig, J. K. Jones, W.D. & Webster. 1991. Glossophaga soricina. Mammalian Species, 379: 1-7. Álvarez-Castañeda, S. T. 1994. Current status of the rice rat Oryzomys couesi penisularis. Southwestern Naturalist. 39:99-100. Alvarez-Castaneda, S. T., and M. A. Bogan. 1998. Myotis peninsularis. Mammalian Species 573:1-2. Anderson, R. P. 1999 [2000]. Preliminary review of the systematics and biogeography of the spiny pocket mice (Heteromys) of Colombia. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales 23:613-630. Anderson, R. P., and C. O. Handley, Jr. 2001. A new species of three-toed sloth (Mammalia: Xenarthra) from Panamá, with a review of the genus Bradypus. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 114:1-33. Anderson, S. 1997. Mammals of Bolivia, taxonomy and distribution. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 231:1-652. Anderson, R. P. 2003. Taxonomy, distribution, and natural history of the genus Heteromys (Rodentia: Heteromyidae) in western Venezuela, with the description of a dwarf species from the Península de Paraguaná. American Museum Novitates 3396:1-43. Anderson, R. P. and P. Jarrín-V. 2002. A new species of spiny pocket mouse (Heteromyidae: Heteromys) endemic to western Ecuador. American Museum Novitates 3382:1-26. Anderson, S. and N. Olds. 1989. Notes on Bolivian Mammals. 5. Taxonomy and Distribution of Bolomys (Muridae, Rodentia). American Museum of Natural History Novitates, 2935:1-22 Anderson, S., and T. L. Yates. 2000. A new genus and species of phyllotine rodent from Bolivia. Journal of Mammalogy 81:18-36 Anderson, S., T. L. Yates, and J. A. Cook. 1987. Notes on Bolivian Mammals. 4. The Genus Ctenomys (Rodentia, Ctenomyidae) in the Eastern Lowlands. American Museum of Natural History Novitates, 2891:1-19. Anonymous. 2002. Plan for biodiversity management and sustainable development of the Turks and Caicos RAMSAR site. Turks & Caicos National Trust, UK 2 Overseas Territories Conservation Forum, and CABI Bioscience, http://www.ukotcf.org/pdf/TCIRamMP/Contents%20and%20Summary.pdf. Arana-Cardó, R., and C. F. Ascorra. 1994. Observaciones sobre la distribución de algunos sigmodontinos (Rodentia, Muridae) altoandinos del Departamento de Lima, Peru. Publicaciones del Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Serie A Zoología 47:1-7. Ascorra, C. F., D. L. Gorchov, and F. Cornejo. 1993. The bats from Jenaro Herrera, Loreto, Peru. Mammalia 57:533-552. Avila Pires, F. D. d., and E. Gouvea. 1977. Mamíferos do Parque Nacional do Itatiaia. Boletim do Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro, nova serie, Zoologia 291:1-29. Avila Pires, F. D. d., and M. R. C. Wutke. 1981. Taxonomia e evolucao de Clyomys Thomas, 1916 (rodentia, Echimyidae). Revista Brasileira de Biología 41:529-534. Ayres, M. 1985. Papëis Avulsos de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo 36:148. Baker, R. J., H. H. Genoways, and A. Cadena G. 1972. The phyllostomatid bat, Vampyressa brocki, in Colombia. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences. 71:54. Baker, R. J., and C.L. Clark. 1987. Uroderma biloatum. Mammalian Species, 279: 1-4. Baker, R. J., M. B. O'Neill, and R. L. McAliley. 2003. A new species of desert shrew, Notiosorex, based on nuclear and mitochondrial sequence data. Museum of Texas Tech University Occasional Papers 222:1-12. Baker, R. J., S. Solari, and F. G. Hoffmann. 2002. A new Central American species from the Carollia brevicauda complex. Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University 217:1-12. Ballou, J. D. et al. 1998. Leontopithecus II : the second population and habitat viability assessment for lion tamarins (Leontopithecus) : Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 20-22 May 1997: final report 1998. IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, Apple Valley, MN. Banfield, A.W. 1974. The mammals of Canada. University or Toronto Press, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Barkley, L. J., and J. O. Whitaker, Jr. 1984. Confirmation of Caenolestes in Peru with information on diet. Journal of Mammalogy 65:328-330. 3 Barnett, A. A. 1991. Records of the grey-bellied shrew opossum, Caenolestes caniventer and Tate's shrew opossum, Caenolestes tatei (Caenolestidae, Marsupialia) from Ecuadorian montane forests. Mammalia 55:443-446. Barnett, A. A. 1999. Small mammals of the Cajas Plateau, southern Ecuador: ecology and natural history. Bulletin. Florida Museum of Natural History 42:161-217. Bárquez, R. M., and S. C. Lougheed. 1990. New distributional records of some Argentine bat species. Journal of Mammalogy 71:261-263. Barquez, R. M., J. K. Braun, M. A. Mares, J. P. Jayat, and D. Flores. 1999. First Record for Argentina for a bat in the genus Micronycteris. Mammalis, 63:368-372. Bárquez, R. M., M. A. Mares, and J. K. Braun. 1999. The bats of Argentina. Special Publications, Museum of Texas Tech University. 42:1-275. Bárquez, R. M., M. A. Mares, and R. A. Ojeda. 1991. Mammals of Tucuman. Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma. Barquez, R. M., M. A. Mares,and R. A. Ojeda. 1991. Mammals of Tucumán. Oklahoma Museum of Natural History. Berta, A. 1982. Cerdocyon thous. Mammalian Species 186:1-4. Best, T. L., and J. B. Jennings. 1997. Myotis leibii. Mammalian Species 547:1-6. Best, T.L., J. L. Hunt, L.A. Mc Williams & K. G. Smith. 2001. Eumops maurus. Mammalian Species, 667: 1-3. Bisbal, F. J. 1989. Distribution and habitat association of the carnivores in Venezuela, Pages 339-361 in K. H. Redford, and J. F. Eisenberg, eds. Advances in Neotropical mammalogy. Gainesville, Florida, Sandhill Crane Press. Bishop, I. R. 1974. An annotated list of caviomorph rodents collected in Northeastern Mato Grosso Brazil. Mammalia 38:489-502. Blood, B. R., and M. K. Clark. 1998. Myotis vivesi. Mammalian Species 588:1-5. Boher Bentti, S. 1988. Nuevos registros de distribución de Lutreolina crassicaudata (Desmarest,1804) en Venezuela. Trianea. Acta Científica y Tecnológica (INDERENA) 1:111-117. Bonvicino, C. R. 2003. A new species of Oryzomys (Rodentia: Sigmodontinae) of the subflavus group from the cerrado of central Brazil. Mammalian Biology 68:78-90. 4 Bonvicino, C. R., A. R. E. A. N. de Menezes, and J. A. Oliveira. 2003. Molecular and karyologic variation in the genus Isothrix (Rodentia, Echimyidae). Hereditas 139:206-211. Bonvicino, C. R., J. F. S. Lima, and F. C. Almeida. 2003. A new species of Calomys Waterhouse (Rodentia, Sigmodontinae) from the cerrado of central Brazil. Revista Bras. Zool. 20:301-307. Bonvicino, C. R., A. Langguth, S. M. Lindbergh, and A. C. de Paula. 1997. An elevational gradient study of small mammals at Caparaó National Park, south eastern Brazil. Mammalia 61:547-560. Bonvicino, C. R., and M. Weksler. 1998. A new species of Oligoryzomys (Rodentia, Sigmodontinae) from northeastern and central Brazil. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 63:90-103. Bradley, R. D., D. S. Carroll, M. L. Haynie, R. Muñiz Martínez, M. J. Hamilton, and C. W. Kilpatrick. 2004. A new species of Peromyscus from western Mexico. Journal of Mammalogy 85:1184-1193. Bradley, R. D., F. Mendez-Harclerode, M. J. Hamilton, and G. Ceballos. 2004. A new species of Reithrodontomys from Guerrero, Mexico. Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University 231:1-12. Braun, J. K., and M. A. Mares. 1995. A new genus and species of phyllotine rodent (Rodentia: Muridae: Sigmodontinae: Phyllotini) from South America. Journal of Mammalogy 76:504-521. Braun, J. K. and M. A. Mares. 2002. Systematics of the Abrocoma cinerea species complex (Rodentia: Abrocomidae), with a description of a new species of Abrocoma. Journal of Mammalogy 83:1-19. Braun, J. K., M. A. Mares, and R. A. Ojeda, 2000. A new species of grass mouse, genus Akodon (Muridae: Sigmodontinae), from Mendoza Province, Argentina. Zeitschrift Saugetierkunde, 65:216-225. Braun, J. K., R. A. Van Den Bussche, P. K. Morton, and M. A. Mares. 2005. Phylogenetic and biogeographic relationships of mouse opossums Thylamys (Didelphimorphia, Didelphidae) in southern South America. Journal of Mammalogy 86:147-159. Brooks, D. M., R.
Recommended publications
  • A Timeline of Significant Events in the Development of North American Mammalogy

    A Timeline of Significant Events in the Development of North American Mammalogy

    SpecialSpecial PublicationsPublications MuseumMuseum ofof TexasTexas TechTech UniversityUniversity NumberNumber xx66 21 Novemberxx XXXX 20102017 A Timeline of SignificantTitle Events in the Development of North American Mammalogy Molecular Biology Structural Biology Biochemistry Microbiology Genomics Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Computer Science Statistics Physical Chemistry Information Technology Mathematics David J. Schmidly, Robert D. Bradley, Lisa C. Bradley, and Richard D. Stevens Front cover: This figure depicts a chronological presentation of some of the significant events, technological breakthroughs, and iconic personalities in the history of North American mammalogy. Red lines and arrows depict the chronological flow (i.e., top row – read left to right, middle row – read right to left, and third row – read left to right). See text and tables for expanded interpretation of the importance of each person or event. Top row: The first three panels (from left) are associated with the time period entitled “The Emergence Phase (16th‒18th Centuries)” – Mark Catesby’s 1748 map of Carolina, Florida, and the Bahama Islands, Thomas Jefferson, and Charles Willson Peale; the next two panels represent “The Discovery Phase (19th Century)” – Spencer Fullerton Baird and C. Hart Merriam. Middle row: The first two panels (from right) represent “The Natural History Phase (1901‒1960)” – Joseph Grinnell and E. Raymond Hall; the next three panels (from right) depict “The Theoretical and Technological Phase (1961‒2000)” – illustration of Robert H. MacArthur and Edward O. Wilson’s theory of island biogeography, karyogram depicting g-banded chromosomes, and photograph of electrophoretic mobility of proteins from an allozyme analysis. Bottom row: These four panels (from left) represent the “Big Data Phase (2001‒present)” – chromatogram illustrating a DNA sequence, bioinformatics and computational biology, phylogenetic tree of mammals, and storage banks for a supercomputer.
  • Classification of Mammals 61

    Classification of Mammals 61

    © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FORCHAPTER SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Classification © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC 4 NOT FORof SALE MammalsOR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC. NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION. 2ND PAGES 9781284032093_CH04_0060.indd 60 8/28/13 12:08 PM CHAPTER 4: Classification of Mammals 61 © Jones Despite& Bartlett their Learning,remarkable success, LLC mammals are much less© Jones stress & onBartlett the taxonomic Learning, aspect LLCof mammalogy, but rather as diverse than are most invertebrate groups. This is probably an attempt to provide students with sufficient information NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FORattributable SALE OR to theirDISTRIBUTION far greater individual size, to the high on the various kinds of mammals to make the subsequent energy requirements of endothermy, and thus to the inabil- discussions of mammalian biology meaningful.
  • Redalyc.Collection Records of Gyldenstolpia Planaltensis (Avila-Pires, 1972) (Rodentia, Cricetidae) Suggest the Local Extinction

    Redalyc.Collection Records of Gyldenstolpia Planaltensis (Avila-Pires, 1972) (Rodentia, Cricetidae) Suggest the Local Extinction

    Mastozoología Neotropical ISSN: 0327-9383 [email protected] Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos Argentina Bezerra, Alexandra M. R. Collection records of Gyldenstolpia planaltensis (Avila-Pires, 1972) (Rodentia, Cricetidae) suggest the local extinction of the species Mastozoología Neotropical, vol. 18, núm. 1, enero-junio, 2011, pp. 119-123 Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos Tucumán, Argentina Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45719986010 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Mastozoología Neotropical, 18(1):119-123, Mendoza, 2011 ISSN 0327-9383 119 ©SAREM, 2011 Versión on-line ISSN 1666-0536 http://www.sarem.org.ar COLLECTION RECORDS OF Gyldenstolpia planaltensis (AVILA-PIRES, 1972) (RODENTIA, CRICETIDAE) SUGGEST THE LOCAL EXTINCTION OF THE SPECIES Alexandra M. R. Bezerra Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade de Brasília, 70910-900, Brasília, DF, Brazil. <abezerra@ fst.com.br> ABSTRACT: The genus Gyldenstolpia was recently described and includes two species, G. fronto and G. planaltensis, both very rare. Gyldenstolpia planaltensis had records in only two localities in the central-western Brazil and is endemic to the Cerrado biome. A new locality is added to G. planaltensis, extending its distribution, and was obtained from a specimen housed in a museum collection. Summarized data on the distribution, ecology and natural history of G. planaltensis denotes that this species can be already extinct or committed to extinction because of habitat conversion and habitat loss.
  • A Dated Phylogeny of Marsupials Using a Molecular Supermatrix and Multiple Fossil Constraints

    A Dated Phylogeny of Marsupials Using a Molecular Supermatrix and Multiple Fossil Constraints

    Journal of Mammalogy, 89(1):175–189, 2008 A DATED PHYLOGENY OF MARSUPIALS USING A MOLECULAR SUPERMATRIX AND MULTIPLE FOSSIL CONSTRAINTS ROBIN M. D. BECK* School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jmammal/article/89/1/175/1020874 by guest on 25 September 2021 Phylogenetic relationships within marsupials were investigated based on a 20.1-kilobase molecular supermatrix comprising 7 nuclear and 15 mitochondrial genes analyzed using both maximum likelihood and Bayesian approaches and 3 different partitioning strategies. The study revealed that base composition bias in the 3rd codon positions of mitochondrial genes misled even the partitioned maximum-likelihood analyses, whereas Bayesian analyses were less affected. After correcting for base composition bias, monophyly of the currently recognized marsupial orders, of Australidelphia, and of a clade comprising Dasyuromorphia, Notoryctes,and Peramelemorphia, were supported strongly by both Bayesian posterior probabilities and maximum-likelihood bootstrap values. Monophyly of the Australasian marsupials, of Notoryctes þ Dasyuromorphia, and of Caenolestes þ Australidelphia were less well supported. Within Diprotodontia, Burramyidae þ Phalangeridae received relatively strong support. Divergence dates calculated using a Bayesian relaxed molecular clock and multiple age constraints suggested at least 3 independent dispersals of marsupials from North to South America during the Late Cretaceous or early Paleocene. Within the Australasian clade, the macropodine radiation, the divergence of phascogaline and dasyurine dasyurids, and the divergence of perameline and peroryctine peramelemorphians all coincided with periods of significant environmental change during the Miocene. An analysis of ‘‘unrepresented basal branch lengths’’ suggests that the fossil record is particularly poor for didelphids and most groups within the Australasian radiation.
  • A Matter of Weight: Critical Comments on the Basic Data Analysed by Maestri Et Al

    A Matter of Weight: Critical Comments on the Basic Data Analysed by Maestri Et Al

    DOI: 10.1111/jbi.13098 CORRESPONDENCE A matter of weight: Critical comments on the basic data analysed by Maestri et al. (2016) in Journal of Biogeography, 43, 1192–1202 Abstract Maestri, Luza, et al. (2016), although we believe that an exploration Recently, Maestri, Luza, et al. (2016) assessed the effect of ecology of the quality of the original data informs both. Ultimately, we sub- and phylogeny on body size variation in communities of South mit that the matrix of body size and the phylogeny used by these American Sigmodontinae rodents. Regrettably, a cursory analysis of authors were plagued with major inaccuracies. the data and the phylogeny used to address this question indicates The matrix of body sizes used by Maestri, Luza, et al. (2016, p. that both are plagued with inaccuracies. We urge “big data” users to 1194) was obtained from two secondary or tertiary sources: give due diligence at compiling data in order to avoid developing Rodrıguez, Olalla-Tarraga, and Hawkins (2008) and Bonvicino, Oli- hypotheses based on insufficient or misleading basic information. veira, and D’Andrea (2008). The former study derived cricetid mass data from Smith et al. (2003), an ambitious project focused on the compilation of “body mass information for all mammals on Earth” We are living a great time in evolutionary biology, where the combi- where the basic data were derived from “primary and secondary lit- nation of the increased power of systematics, coupled with the use erature ... Whenever possible, we used an average of male and of ever more inclusive datasets allows—heretofore impossible— female body mass, which was in turn averaged over multiple locali- questions in ecology and evolution to be addressed.
  • Cómo Citar El Artículo Número Completo Más

    Cómo Citar El Artículo Número Completo Más

    Mastozoología Neotropical ISSN: 0327-9383 ISSN: 1666-0536 [email protected] Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos Argentina Teta, Pablo; Abba, Agustín M.; Cassini, Guillermo H.; Flores, David A.; Galliari, Carlos A.; Lucero, Sergio O.; Ramírez, Mariano LISTA REVISADA DE LOS MAMÍFEROS DE ARGENTINA Mastozoología Neotropical, vol. 25, núm. 1, 2018, Enero-Junio, pp. 163-198 Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos Argentina Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45758865015 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Redalyc Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina y el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Mastozoología Neotropical, 25(1):163-198, Mendoza, 2018 Copyright ©SAREM, 2018 http://www.sarem.org.ar Versión on-line ISSN 1666-0536 http://www.sbmz.com.br Artículo LISTA REVISADA DE LOS MAMÍFEROS DE ARGENTINA Pablo Teta1, 5, Agustín M. Abba2, 5, Guillermo H. Cassini1, 3, 5, David A. Flores4 ,5, Carlos A. Galliari2, 5, Sergio O. Lucero1, 5 y Mariano Ramírez1, 5 1 División Mastozoología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Buenos Aires, Argentina. [Correspondencia: Pablo Teta <[email protected]>] 2 Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores (CEPAVE, CONICET-UNLP), La Plata, Argentina. 3 Departamento de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Nacional de Luján, Luján, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 4 Instituto de Vertebrados, Unidad Ejecutora Lillo (CONICET- Fundación Miguel Lillo), Tucumán, Argentina. 5 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina. RESUMEN. Se presenta una lista revisada de los mamíferos de Argentina, incorporando los cambios taxonómi- cos recientes y los nuevos registros para el país producidos desde la publicación de un listado previo en 2006.
  • Monodelphis Domestica in the Opossum Λ Conservation Of

    Monodelphis Domestica in the Opossum Λ Conservation Of

    Marsupial Light Chains: Complexity and Conservation of λ in the Opossum Monodelphis domestica This information is current as Julie E. Lucero, George H. Rosenberg and Robert D. Miller of September 29, 2021. J Immunol 1998; 161:6724-6732; ; http://www.jimmunol.org/content/161/12/6724 Downloaded from References This article cites 35 articles, 10 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/161/12/6724.full#ref-list-1 Why The JI? Submit online. http://www.jimmunol.org/ • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication *average by guest on September 29, 2021 Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. Marsupial Light Chains: Complexity and Conservation of l in the Opossum Monodelphis domestica1,2 Julie E. Lucero, George H. Rosenberg, and Robert D. Miller3 The Igl chains in the South American opossum, Monodelphis domestica, were analyzed at the expressed cDNA and genomic organization level, the first described for a nonplacental mammal.
  • Check List and Authors Chec List Open Access | Freely Available at Journal of Species Lists and Distribution

    Check List and Authors Chec List Open Access | Freely Available at Journal of Species Lists and Distribution

    ISSN 1809-127X (online edition) © 2010 Check List and Authors Chec List Open Access | Freely available at www.checklist.org.br Journal of species lists and distribution N Mammalia, Rodentia, Cricetidae, Irenomys tarsalis ISTRIBUTIO D gaps (Philippi, 1900): New records for Argentina and filling RAPHIC Gabriel M. Martin G EO G N O E-mail:Consejo [email protected] Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) and Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia “San Juan Bosco”, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales Sede Esquel, Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Evolución y Biodiversidad. Sarmiento 849, CP 9200. Esquel, CH, Argentina. OTES N Abstract: Ten new records for the Chilean tree mouse, Irenomys tarsalis, are presented from western Argentina. This at least 125 km in western Chubut Province, where I. tarsalis was previously known for only three records. Additionally, environmentalrepresents a near information 30 % increase at an inecoregional the number and of habitatknown scalelocalities is provided. for the species in this country. Nine of them fill a gap of The Chilean tree mouse Irenomys tarsalis (Philippi, I. tarsalis specimens was made 1900) is a large rodent that inhabits the temperate following Pearson (1995) and by comparison with museum rainforests of southern Chile and adjacent Argentina specimensIdentification (MLP 11.VI.96.10,of MLP 29.IV.99.11), in which (Pearson 1983; 1995; Kelt 1993). Considered one of the combination of the following characters (including the rarest sigmodontines of the Southern Temperate exosomatic, craniomandibular and dental traits) can be Rainforests, the phylogenetic relationship of the species is considered diagnostic (see also Osgood 1943; Mann 1978; still debated and very little is known of its natural history Kelt 1993; Pearson 1995): rat-like in appearance with (Pardiñas et al.
  • Intestinal Helminths in Wild Rodents from Native Forest and Exotic Pine Plantations (Pinus Radiata) in Central Chile

    Intestinal Helminths in Wild Rodents from Native Forest and Exotic Pine Plantations (Pinus Radiata) in Central Chile

    animals Communication Intestinal Helminths in Wild Rodents from Native Forest and Exotic Pine Plantations (Pinus radiata) in Central Chile Maira Riquelme 1, Rodrigo Salgado 1, Javier A. Simonetti 2, Carlos Landaeta-Aqueveque 3 , Fernando Fredes 4 and André V. Rubio 1,* 1 Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas Animales, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Universidad de Chile, Santa Rosa 11735, La Pintana, Santiago 8820808, Chile; [email protected] (M.R.); [email protected] (R.S.) 2 Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 653, Santiago 7750000, Chile; [email protected] 3 Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad de Concepción, Casilla 537, Chillán 3812120, Chile; [email protected] 4 Departamento de Medicina Preventiva Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Universidad de Chile, Santa Rosa 11735, La Pintana, Santiago 8820808, Chile; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +56-229-780-372 Simple Summary: Land-use changes are one of the most important drivers of zoonotic disease risk in humans, including helminths of wildlife origin. In this paper, we investigated the presence and prevalence of intestinal helminths in wild rodents, comparing this parasitism between a native forest and exotic Monterey pine plantations (adult and young plantations) in central Chile. By analyzing 1091 fecal samples of a variety of rodent species sampled over two years, we recorded several helminth Citation: Riquelme, M.; Salgado, R.; families and genera, some of them potentially zoonotic. We did not find differences in the prevalence of Simonetti, J.A.; Landaeta-Aqueveque, helminths between habitat types, but other factors (rodent species and season of the year) were relevant C.; Fredes, F.; Rubio, A.V.
  • Advances in Cytogenetics of Brazilian Rodents: Cytotaxonomy, Chromosome Evolution and New Karyotypic Data

    Advances in Cytogenetics of Brazilian Rodents: Cytotaxonomy, Chromosome Evolution and New Karyotypic Data

    COMPARATIVE A peer-reviewed open-access journal CompCytogenAdvances 11(4): 833–892 in cytogenetics (2017) of Brazilian rodents: cytotaxonomy, chromosome evolution... 833 doi: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v11i4.19925 RESEARCH ARTICLE Cytogenetics http://compcytogen.pensoft.net International Journal of Plant & Animal Cytogenetics, Karyosystematics, and Molecular Systematics Advances in cytogenetics of Brazilian rodents: cytotaxonomy, chromosome evolution and new karyotypic data Camilla Bruno Di-Nizo1, Karina Rodrigues da Silva Banci1, Yukie Sato-Kuwabara2, Maria José de J. Silva1 1 Laboratório de Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto Butantan, Avenida Vital Brazil, 1500, CEP 05503-900, São Paulo, SP, Brazil 2 Departamento de Genética e Biologia Evolutiva, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão 277, CEP 05508-900, São Paulo, SP, Brazil Corresponding author: Maria José de J. Silva ([email protected]) Academic editor: A. Barabanov | Received 1 August 2017 | Accepted 23 October 2017 | Published 21 December 2017 http://zoobank.org/203690A5-3F53-4C78-A64F-C2EB2A34A67C Citation: Di-Nizo CB, Banci KRS, Sato-Kuwabara Y, Silva MJJ (2017) Advances in cytogenetics of Brazilian rodents: cytotaxonomy, chromosome evolution and new karyotypic data. Comparative Cytogenetics 11(4): 833–892. https://doi. org/10.3897/CompCytogen.v11i4.19925 Abstract Rodents constitute one of the most diversified mammalian orders. Due to the morphological similarity in many of the groups, their taxonomy is controversial. Karyotype information proved to be an important tool for distinguishing some species because some of them are species-specific. Additionally, rodents can be an excellent model for chromosome evolution studies since many rearrangements have been described in this group.This work brings a review of cytogenetic data of Brazilian rodents, with information about diploid and fundamental numbers, polymorphisms, and geographical distribution.
  • OPOSSUM Didelphis Virginiana

    OPOSSUM Didelphis Virginiana

    OPOSSUM Didelphis virginiana The Virginia opossum, Didelphis virginiana, is the only marsupial (pouched animal) native to North America. The opossum is not a native species to Vermont, but a population has become established here. The opossum is mostly active at night, being what is referred to as ‘nocturnal.’ They are very good climbers and capable swimmers. These two skills help the opossum avoid predators. It is well known for faking death (also called ‘playing possum’) as another means of outwitting its enemies. The opossum adapts to a wide variety of habitats which has led to its widespread distribution throughout the United States. Vermont Wildlife Fact Sheet Physical Description Opossums breed every other areas near water sources. year, having one litter every They have become very The fur of the Virginia two years. Opossums reach common in urban, suburban, opossum is grayish white in the age of sexual maturity at 6 and farming areas. The color and covers the whole to 7 months. opossum is a wanderer and body except the ears and tail. does not stick to a specific They are about the size of a Food Items territory. The opossum uses large house cat, weighing abandoned burrows, tree between 9 and 13 pounds and The opossum is an cavities, hollow logs, attics, having a body length of 24 to insectivore and an omnivore. garages, or building 40 inches. The opossum has a This means they have a foundations. prehensile tail, one which is varied diet of insects, worms, adapted for grasping and fruits, nuts, and carrion (dead hanging. animals).
  • The Neotropical Region Sensu the Areas of Endemism of Terrestrial Mammals

    The Neotropical Region Sensu the Areas of Endemism of Terrestrial Mammals

    Australian Systematic Botany, 2017, 30, 470–484 ©CSIRO 2017 doi:10.1071/SB16053_AC Supplementary material The Neotropical region sensu the areas of endemism of terrestrial mammals Elkin Alexi Noguera-UrbanoA,B,C,D and Tania EscalanteB APosgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Unidad de Posgrado, Edificio A primer piso, Circuito de Posgrados, Ciudad Universitaria, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), 04510 Mexico City, Mexico. BGrupo de Investigación en Biogeografía de la Conservación, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), 04510 Mexico City, Mexico. CGrupo de Investigación de Ecología Evolutiva, Departamento de Biología, Universidad de Nariño, Ciudadela Universitaria Torobajo, 1175-1176 Nariño, Colombia. DCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Page 1 of 18 Australian Systematic Botany, 2017, 30, 470–484 ©CSIRO 2017 doi:10.1071/SB16053_AC Table S1. List of taxa processed Number Taxon Number Taxon 1 Abrawayaomys ruschii 55 Akodon montensis 2 Abrocoma 56 Akodon mystax 3 Abrocoma bennettii 57 Akodon neocenus 4 Abrocoma boliviensis 58 Akodon oenos 5 Abrocoma budini 59 Akodon orophilus 6 Abrocoma cinerea 60 Akodon paranaensis 7 Abrocoma famatina 61 Akodon pervalens 8 Abrocoma shistacea 62 Akodon philipmyersi 9 Abrocoma uspallata 63 Akodon reigi 10 Abrocoma vaccarum 64 Akodon sanctipaulensis 11 Abrocomidae 65 Akodon serrensis 12 Abrothrix 66 Akodon siberiae 13 Abrothrix andinus 67 Akodon simulator 14 Abrothrix hershkovitzi 68 Akodon spegazzinii 15 Abrothrix illuteus