DOCSLIB.ORG

Classification of Mammals 61

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Classification of Mammals 61 © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FORCHAPTER SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Classification © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC 4 NOT FORof SALE MammalsOR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC. NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION. 2ND PAGES 9781284032093_CH04_0060.indd 60 8/28/13 12:08 PM CHAPTER 4: Classification of Mammals 61 © Jones Despite& Bartlett their Learning,remarkable success, LLC mammals are much less© Jones stress & onBartlett the taxonomic Learning, aspect LLCof mammalogy, but rather as diverse than are most invertebrate groups. This is probably an attempt to provide students with sufficient information NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FORattributable SALE OR to theirDISTRIBUTION far greater individual size, to the high on the various kinds of mammals to make the subsequent energy requirements of endothermy, and thus to the inabil- discussions of mammalian biology meaningful. Students’ ity of mammals to exploit great numbers of restricted eco- interest is often dulled if they must deal with information logical niches. Wilson and Reeder (2005) recognized about about completely unfamiliar kinds of animals. It seems 1,229 genera and 5,416© speciesJones of & living Bartlett mammals. Learning, Most LLCpointless to discuss water© regulation Jones & in Bartlett heteromyids, Learning, for LLC species of extant mammalsNOT FORhave already SALE been OR described, DISTRIBUTION example, if students haveNOT only aFOR vague SALE idea of ORwhat DISTRIBUTION a het- but approximately 10 to 12 new species continue to be eromyid is. named each year. Many of these are cryptic species, dis- Phylogenetic systematics is a major focus of much of tinct genetically but difficult or impossible to distinguish the basic research conducted on mammals today. It is also morphologically from already known species. When fossil an important feature of many other fields, from conserva- mammals© Jones are considered, & Bartlett the Learning, numbers are LLC more impres- tion biology© Jones to molecular & Bartlett genetics. Learning, Increasingly, LLC authors sive. NOTIn the FOR compendium SALE OR of McKenna DISTRIBUTION and Bell (1997), attempt NOTto construct FOR SALE or use classificationOR DISTRIBUTION schemes that 5,162 genera of mammals in 425 families—of which 4,079 reflect the presumed phylogeny of mammals and other genera (79%) and 300 families (71%) are extinct—had been organisms, as we have done in this book. Reconstructing named, with additional new fossil taxa named each year. a phylogeny and producing a classification for a group of © Jones &Still, Bartlett the numbers Learning, of genera LLC and species are insignificant© Jones organisms & Bartlett are very Learning, different goals,LLC however, and the results NOT FORin SALE comparison OR DISTRIBUTION with those for invertebrates. There are, NOTfor FORare often SALE controversial. OR DISTRIBUTION The classification that follows example, an estimated 950,000 named species of insects (Table 4-1) is largely that of the various authors in Wilson (perhaps 8 to 100 million undiscovered), 40,000 of protists and Reeder (2005). No classification system yet proposed (perhaps 100,000 to 200,000 undiscovered), and 70,000 of has gained universal acceptance, but Wilson and Reeder’s is mollusks (perhaps 200,000 undiscovered). a useful recent compendium. In keeping with the contem- We devote considerable© Jones attention & Bartlett to the Learning,orders and LLCporary approach, categories© Jones other than & BartlettOrder and Learning, Family LLC families of mammals NOTnot because FOR weSALE wish toOR put DISTRIBUTION primary are not given for the higherNOT taxa FOR named. SALE OR DISTRIBUTION TABLE 4-1 A Classification of Recent Mammals Classification Common Name(s) Prototheria© Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOTOrder FOR Monotremata SALE OR(5 species) DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Family Tachyglossidae Echidnas, spiny anteaters Ornithorhynchidae Duck-billed platypus Theria © Jones & Bartlett Metatheria Learning, (Marsupialia) LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALEOrder OR Didelphimorphia DISTRIBUTION (89 species) NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Family Didelphidae Opossums Order Paucituberculata (6 species) Family Caenolestidae Rat opossums © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC Order Microbiotheria (1 species) NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Family Microbiotheriidae Monito del monte, llaca Order Dasyuromorphia (71 species) Family Thylacinidae (extinct) Thylacine © Jones & BartlettMyrmecobiidae Learning, LLC Numbat © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALEDasyuridae OR DISTRIBUTION Dasyures, NOTquolls, FORantechinuses, SALE dunnarts, OR DISTRIBUTION Tasmanian devil Order Peramelemorphia (22 species) Family Thylacomyidae Bilbies Peramelidae Bandicoots, echymiperas © Jones & Bartlett Learning, Chaeropodidae LLC © JonesPig-footed & Bartlett bandicoot Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION (continues) 2ND PAGES © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC. NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION. 9781284032093_CH04_0060.indd 61 8/28/13 12:08 PM 62 PART I: Introduction to the Mammalia © JonesTABLE & Bartlett 4-1 A Learning,Classification LLC of Recent Mammals© (continued) Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FORClassification SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOTCommon FOR Name(s)SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Order Notoryctemorphia (2 species) Family Notoryctidae Marsupial “moles,” itjaritjaris Order Diprotodontia (144 species) Family Phascolarctidae© Jones & Bartlett Learning,Koalas LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC VombatidaeNOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTIONWombats NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Burramyidae Pygmy possums Phalangeridae Cuscuses, phalangers © Jones Pseudocheiridae & Bartlett Learning, LLC Ring-tailed possums© Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR Petauridae SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Gliders, striped NOTpossums FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Tarsipedidae Honey possum, noolbenger Acrobatidae Feathertail possum, feathertail glider Hypsiprymnodontidae Musky rat kangaroo © Jones & Bartlett Learning, Potoroidae LLC © RatJones kangaroos, & Bartlett bettongs, Learning, potoroos LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTIONMacropodidae NOTKangaroos, FOR SALEwallabies OR DISTRIBUTION Eutheria (Placentalia) Order Afrosoricida (51 species) Family Tenrecidae Tenrecs © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC ChrysochloridaeNOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTIONGolden moles NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Order Macroscelidea (15 species) Family Macroscelididae Elephant-shrews Order Tubulidentata (1 species) © JonesFamily Orycteropodidae& Bartlett Learning, LLC Aardvark © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC OrderNOT Proboscidea FOR SALE (3 species) OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Family Elephantidae Elephants Order Sirenia (5 species) Family Dugongidae Dugongs, sea cows © Jones & Bartlett Learning, Trichechidae LLC © ManateesJones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Order Hyracoidea (4 species) Family Procaviidae Hyraxes Order Cingulata (21 species) Family Dasypodidae© Jones & Bartlett Learning,Armadillos LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC Order Pilosa (10 species)NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Family Bradypodidae Three-toed tree sloths Megalonychidae Two-toed tree sloths Cyclopedidae Silky anteater © Jones Myrmecophagidae& Bartlett Learning, LLC Tamanduas and© giant Jones anteater & Bartlett Learning, LLC OrderNOT Dermoptera FOR SALE (2 species) OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Family Cynocephalidae Colugos Order Scandentia (20 species) © Jones & Bartlett Family Learning, Tupaiidae LLC © TreeJones shrews & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTIONPtilocercidae NOTPen-tailed FOR treeshrew SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC. NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION. 2ND PAGES 9781284032093_CH04_0060.indd 62 8/28/13 12:08 PM CHAPTER 4: Classification of Mammals 63 © Jones &Classification Bartlett Learning, LLC © JonesCommon & Bartlett Name(s) Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALEOrder OR Primates DISTRIBUTION (376 species) NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Family Cheirogaleidae Dwarf lemurs, mouse lemurs Lemuridae Lemurs Lepilemuridae Sportive lemurs Indriidae© Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLCWooly lemurs, sifakas © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Daubentoniidae Aye-aye Lorisidae Lorises
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Blind Mole Rat (Spalax Leucodon) Masseter Muscle: Structure, Homology, Diversification and Nomenclature A
    Folia Morphol. Vol. 78, No. 2, pp. 419–424 DOI: 10.5603/FM.a2018.0097 O R I G I N A L A R T I C L E Copyright © 2019 Via Medica ISSN 0015–5659 journals.viamedica.pl Blind mole rat (Spalax leucodon) masseter muscle: structure, homology, diversification and nomenclature A. Yoldas1, M. Demir1, R. İlgun2, M.O. Dayan3 1Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Kahramanmaras University, Kahramanmaras, Turkey 2Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Aksaray University, Aksaray, Turkey 3Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey [Received: 10 July 2018; Accepted: 23 September 2018] Background: It is well known that rodents are defined by a unique masticatory apparatus. The present study describes the design and structure of the masseter muscle of the blind mole rat (Spalax leucodon). The blind mole rat, which emer- ged 5.3–3.4 million years ago during the Late Pliocene period, is a subterranean, hypoxia-tolerant and cancer-resistant rodent. Yet, despite these impressive cha- racteristics, no information exists on their masticatory musculature. Materials and methods: Fifteen adult blind mole rats were used in this study. Dissections were performed to investigate the anatomical characteristics of the masseter muscle. Results: The muscle was comprised of three different parts: the superficial mas- seter, the deep masseter and the zygomaticomandibularis muscle. The superficial masseter originated from the facial fossa at the ventral side of the infraorbital foramen. The deep masseter was separated into anterior and posterior parts. The anterior part of the zygomaticomandibularis muscle arose from the snout and passed through the infraorbital foramen to connect on the mandible.
    [Show full text]
  • A Timeline of Significant Events in the Development of North American Mammalogy
    SpecialSpecial PublicationsPublications MuseumMuseum ofof TexasTexas TechTech UniversityUniversity NumberNumber xx66 21 Novemberxx XXXX 20102017 A Timeline of SignificantTitle Events in the Development of North American Mammalogy Molecular Biology Structural Biology Biochemistry Microbiology Genomics Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Computer Science Statistics Physical Chemistry Information Technology Mathematics David J. Schmidly, Robert D. Bradley, Lisa C. Bradley, and Richard D. Stevens Front cover: This figure depicts a chronological presentation of some of the significant events, technological breakthroughs, and iconic personalities in the history of North American mammalogy. Red lines and arrows depict the chronological flow (i.e., top row – read left to right, middle row – read right to left, and third row – read left to right). See text and tables for expanded interpretation of the importance of each person or event. Top row: The first three panels (from left) are associated with the time period entitled “The Emergence Phase (16th‒18th Centuries)” – Mark Catesby’s 1748 map of Carolina, Florida, and the Bahama Islands, Thomas Jefferson, and Charles Willson Peale; the next two panels represent “The Discovery Phase (19th Century)” – Spencer Fullerton Baird and C. Hart Merriam. Middle row: The first two panels (from right) represent “The Natural History Phase (1901‒1960)” – Joseph Grinnell and E. Raymond Hall; the next three panels (from right) depict “The Theoretical and Technological Phase (1961‒2000)” – illustration of Robert H. MacArthur and Edward O. Wilson’s theory of island biogeography, karyogram depicting g-banded chromosomes, and photograph of electrophoretic mobility of proteins from an allozyme analysis. Bottom row: These four panels (from left) represent the “Big Data Phase (2001‒present)” – chromatogram illustrating a DNA sequence, bioinformatics and computational biology, phylogenetic tree of mammals, and storage banks for a supercomputer.
    [Show full text]
  • West Indian Manatee (Trichechus Manatus) Habitat Characterization Using Side-Scan Sonar
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Master's Theses Graduate Research 2017 West Indian Manatee (Trichechus Manatus) Habitat Characterization Using Side-Scan Sonar Mindy J. McLarty Andrews University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/theses Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation McLarty, Mindy J., "West Indian Manatee (Trichechus Manatus) Habitat Characterization Using Side-Scan Sonar" (2017). Master's Theses. 98. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/theses/98 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT WEST INDIAN MANATEE (TRICHECHUS MANATUS) HABITAT CHARACTERIZATION USING SIDE-SCAN SONAR by Mindy J. McLarty Chair: Daniel Gonzalez-Socoloske ABSTRACT OF GRADUATE STUDENT RESEARCH Thesis Andrews University School of Arts and Sciences Title: WEST INDIAN MANATEE (TRICHECHUS MANATUS) HABITAT CHARACTERIZATION USING SIDE-SCAN SONAR Name of researcher: Mindy J. McLarty Name and degree of faculty chair: Daniel Gonzalez-Socoloske, Ph.D. Date completed: April 2017 In this study, the reliability of low cost side-scan sonar to accurately identify soft substrates such as grass and mud was tested. Benthic substrates can be hard to classify from the surface, necessitating an alternative survey approach. A total area of 11.5 km2 was surveyed with the sonar in a large, brackish mangrove lagoon system. Individual points were ground-truthed for comparison with the sonar recordings to provide a measure of accuracy.
    [Show full text]
  • How Whales Used to Filter: Exceptionally Preserved Baleen in A
    Journal of Anatomy J. Anat. (2017) 231, pp212--220 doi: 10.1111/joa.12622 How whales used to filter: exceptionally preserved baleen in a Miocene cetotheriid Felix G. Marx,1,2,3 Alberto Collareta,4,5 Anna Gioncada,4 Klaas Post,6 Olivier Lambert,3 Elena Bonaccorsi,4 Mario Urbina7 and Giovanni Bianucci4 1School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Vic., Australia 2Geosciences, Museum Victoria, Melbourne, Vic., Australia 3D.O. Terre et Histoire de la Vie, Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Brussels, Belgium 4Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Universita di Pisa, Pisa, Italy 5Dottorato Regionale in Scienze della Terra Pegaso, Pisa, Italy 6Natuurhistorisch Museum Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands 7Departamento de Paleontologıa de Vertebrados, Museo de Historia Natural de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru Abstract Baleen is a comb-like structure that enables mysticete whales to bulk feed on vast quantities of small prey, and ultimately allowed them to become the largest animals on Earth. Because baleen rarely fossilises, extremely little is known about its evolution, structure and function outside the living families. Here we describe, for the first time, the exceptionally preserved baleen apparatus of an entirely extinct mysticete morphotype: the Late Miocene cetotheriid, Piscobalaena nana, from the Pisco Formation of Peru. The baleen plates of P. nana are closely spaced and built around relatively dense, fine tubules, as in the enigmatic pygmy right whale, Caperea marginata. Phosphatisation of the intertubular horn, but not the tubules themselves, suggests in vivo intertubular calcification. The size of the rack matches the distribution of nutrient foramina on the palate, and implies the presence of an unusually large subrostral gap.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Marine Mammal Species and Subspecies
    List of Marine Mammal Species and Subspecies Introduction The Committee on Taxonomy, chaired by Patricia Rosel, produced the first official Society for Marine Mammalogy list of marine mammal species and subspecies in 2010. Consensus on some issues has not been possible; this is reflected in the footnotes. The list is updated at least annually. The current version was updated in May 2020. This list can be cited as follows: “Committee on Taxonomy. 2019. List of marine mammal species and subspecies. Society for Marine Mammalogy, www.marinemammalscience.org, consulted on [date].” This list includes living and recently extinct (within historical times) species and subspecies. It is meant to reflect prevailing usage and recent revisions published in the peer-reviewed literature. Classification and scientific names follow Rice (1998), with adjustments reflecting more recent literature. Author(s) and year of description of each taxon follow the Latin (scientific) species name; when these are enclosed in parentheses, the taxon was originally described in a different genus. The Committee annually considers and evaluates new, peer-reviewed literature that proposes taxonomic changes. The Committee’s focus is on alpha taxonomy (describing and naming taxa) and beta taxonomy primarily at lower levels of the hierarchy (subspecies, species and genera), although it may evaluate issues at higher levels if deemed necessary. Proposals for new, taxonomically distinct taxa require a formal, peer-reviewed study and should provide robust evidence that some subspecies or species criterion was met. For review of species concepts, see Reeves et al. (2004), Orr and Coyne (2004), de Queiroz (2007), Perrin (2009) and Taylor et al.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dated Phylogeny of Marsupials Using a Molecular Supermatrix and Multiple Fossil Constraints
    Journal of Mammalogy, 89(1):175–189, 2008 A DATED PHYLOGENY OF MARSUPIALS USING A MOLECULAR SUPERMATRIX AND MULTIPLE FOSSIL CONSTRAINTS ROBIN M. D. BECK* School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jmammal/article/89/1/175/1020874 by guest on 25 September 2021 Phylogenetic relationships within marsupials were investigated based on a 20.1-kilobase molecular supermatrix comprising 7 nuclear and 15 mitochondrial genes analyzed using both maximum likelihood and Bayesian approaches and 3 different partitioning strategies. The study revealed that base composition bias in the 3rd codon positions of mitochondrial genes misled even the partitioned maximum-likelihood analyses, whereas Bayesian analyses were less affected. After correcting for base composition bias, monophyly of the currently recognized marsupial orders, of Australidelphia, and of a clade comprising Dasyuromorphia, Notoryctes,and Peramelemorphia, were supported strongly by both Bayesian posterior probabilities and maximum-likelihood bootstrap values. Monophyly of the Australasian marsupials, of Notoryctes þ Dasyuromorphia, and of Caenolestes þ Australidelphia were less well supported. Within Diprotodontia, Burramyidae þ Phalangeridae received relatively strong support. Divergence dates calculated using a Bayesian relaxed molecular clock and multiple age constraints suggested at least 3 independent dispersals of marsupials from North to South America during the Late Cretaceous or early Paleocene. Within the Australasian clade, the macropodine radiation, the divergence of phascogaline and dasyurine dasyurids, and the divergence of perameline and peroryctine peramelemorphians all coincided with periods of significant environmental change during the Miocene. An analysis of ‘‘unrepresented basal branch lengths’’ suggests that the fossil record is particularly poor for didelphids and most groups within the Australasian radiation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogeny and Timescale for Marsupial Evolution Based on Sequences for Five Nuclear Genes
    J Mammal Evol DOI 10.1007/s10914-007-9062-6 ORIGINAL PAPER A Phylogeny and Timescale for Marsupial Evolution Based on Sequences for Five Nuclear Genes Robert W. Meredith & Michael Westerman & Judd A. Case & Mark S. Springer # Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2007 Abstract Even though marsupials are taxonomically less diverse than placentals, they exhibit comparable morphological and ecological diversity. However, much of their fossil record is thought to be missing, particularly for the Australasian groups. The more than 330 living species of marsupials are grouped into three American (Didelphimorphia, Microbiotheria, and Paucituberculata) and four Australasian (Dasyuromorphia, Diprotodontia, Notoryctemorphia, and Peramelemorphia) orders. Interordinal relationships have been investigated using a wide range of methods that have often yielded contradictory results. Much of the controversy has focused on the placement of Dromiciops gliroides (Microbiotheria). Studies either support a sister-taxon relationship to a monophyletic Australasian clade or a nested position within the Australasian radiation. Familial relationships within the Diprotodontia have also proved difficult to resolve. Here, we examine higher-level marsupial relationships using a nuclear multigene molecular data set representing all living orders. Protein-coding portions of ApoB, BRCA1, IRBP, Rag1, and vWF were analyzed using maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian methods. Two different Bayesian relaxed molecular clock methods were employed to construct a timescale for marsupial evolution and estimate the unrepresented basal branch length (UBBL). Maximum likelihood and Bayesian results suggest that the root of the marsupial tree is between Didelphimorphia and all other marsupials. All methods provide strong support for the monophyly of Australidelphia. Within Australidelphia, Dromiciops is the sister-taxon to a monophyletic Australasian clade.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Cambridge University Press 0521545498 - Teeth, Second Edition Simon Hillson Excerpt More information INTRODUCTION Teeth have the great archaeological advantage of being constructed from remarkably tough materials, which can survive a century and more in the harsh environment of the mouth. They also survive in a very wide range of archaeological sites and conditions of burial. Teeth of large animals are part of the carcass which is thrown away early in the butchery process, and so become incorporated quickly into rubbish deposits. They are readily recognised during excavation and routinely recovered in a similar way to artefacts. Often, they are amongst the most numerous finds. At large town sites in Britain, for instance, the number of identifiable bone and tooth fragments frequently exceeds the total of recognisable sherds of pottery. The importance of recovering such material from excavations has long been recognised. In his Primeval Antiquities of Denmark (1849), J. J. A. Worsaae asserted firmly that all objects from archaeological sites, including animal bones, should be preserved. As archaeology developed, finds of the remains of extinct mammals alongside human bones and artefacts came to provide crucial evidence for the antiq- uity of man. William Pengelly’s famous excavations of Brixham Cave in 1858–9 revealed a deposit containing flint tools and extinct animal bones that was sealed by a thick layer of stalagmite, also containing remains of extinct animals (Daniel, 1978). Most teeth from mammals larger than a cat can be recognised when trowelling on an archaeological site, or quickly recovered by sieving/screening at a coarse mesh (1 cm). Small mammals – traditionally those not tall enough to be seen above long grass – may have very small teeth indeed.
    [Show full text]
  • Dipodomys Ingens)
    Species Status Assessment Report for the Giant Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys ingens) Photo by Elizabeth Bainbridge Version 1.0 August 2020 Prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service August 2020 GKR SSA Report – August 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service listed the giant kangaroo rat (Dipodomys ingens) as endangered under the Endangered Species Act in 1987 due to the threats of habitat loss and widespread rodenticide use (Service 1987, entire). The giant kangaroo rat is the largest species in the genus that contains all kangaroo rats. The giant kangaroo rat is found only in south-central California, on the western slopes of the San Joaquin Valley, the Carrizo and Elkhorn Plains, and the Cuyama Valley. The preferred habitat of the giant kangaroo rat is native, sloping annual grasslands with sparse vegetation (Grinnell, 1932; Williams, 1980). This report summarizes the results of a species status assessment (SSA) that the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) completed for the giant kangaroo rat. To assess the species’ viability, we used the three conservation biology principles of resiliency, redundancy, and representation (together, the 3Rs). These principles rely on assessing the species at an individual, population, and species level to determine whether the species can persist into the future and avoid extinction by having multiple resilient populations distributed widely across its range. Giant kangaroo rats remain in fragmented habitat patches throughout their historical range. However, some areas where giant kangaroo rats once existed have not had documented occurrences for 30 years or more. The giant kangaroo rat is found in six geographic areas (units), representing the northern, middle, and southern portions of the range.
    [Show full text]
  • Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus Arctos and U
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2017 Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus arctos and U. americanus Benjamin James Hillesheim East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Evolution Commons, and the Paleontology Commons Recommended Citation Hillesheim, Benjamin James, "Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus arctos and U. americanus" (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3261. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3261 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus arctos and U. americanus ____________________________________ A thesis presented to the Department of Geosciences East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Geosciences ____________________________________ by Benjamin Hillesheim May 2017 ____________________________________ Dr. Blaine W. Schubert, Chair Dr. Steven C. Wallace Dr. Josh X. Samuels Keywords: Ursidae, Geometric morphometrics, Ursus americanus, Ursus arctos, Last Glacial Maximum ABSTRACT Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus arctos and U. americanus by Benjamin J. Hillesheim Despite being separated by millions of years of evolution, black bears (Ursus americanus) and brown bears (Ursus arctos) can be difficult to distinguish based on skeletal and dental material alone. Complicating matters, some Late Pleistocene U. americanus are significantly larger in size than their modern relatives, obscuring the identification of the two bears.
    [Show full text]
  • Rock Hyraxes (Procavia Capensis) and Their Environments
    Rock Hyraxes (Procavia capensis) and Their Environments: 13 15 δ Ccollagen and δ Ncollagen as environmental indicators Lesa la Grange Supervised by Dr Deano Stynder and Prof Judith Sealy University of Cape Town Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy (MPhil) in Archaeology Department of Archaeology University of Cape Town 20 July 2015 The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town Abstract Rock hyraxes (Procavia capensis) are a common component of faunal assemblages at South African archaeological sites. Previous studies have focused on their remains as proxies for aspects of diet and mobility in prehistoric human populations. They have also been recognized as valuable palaeoenvironmental indicators due to the fact that their stratified communal middens record shifts in stable isotopes, palynology, and molecular biomarkers that appear to reflect environmental change. Previous studies conducted in east Africa have concluded that rock hyraxes are preferential grazers. There is comparatively little evidence, however, for the dietary preference of South African rock hyraxes, although it has been suggested that they consume more browse. This research aims to quantify the carbon isotopic ratios in their bone collagen to reconstruct diet. Results support preferential browsing in South African rock hyraxes, with a mean δ13C value for all animals in this study of -20.3 ± 1.9‰ (n = 210) indicating a C3 dietary contribution of 73.4 ± 13.3%.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientists Hope to Breed Asian 'Unicorns' – If They Can Find Them
    Scientists hope to breed Asian ‘unicorns’ – if they can find them Conservationists see only one hope for the saola: a risky captive breeding programme Jeremy Hance Thursday 10 August 2017 03.42 EDT n 1996, William Robichaud spent three weeks with Martha before she died. Robichaud I studied Martha – a beautiful, enigmatic, shy saola – with a scientist’s eye but also fell under the gracile animal’s spell as she ate out of his hand and allowed herself to be stroked. Captured by local hunters, Martha spent those final days in a Laotian village, doted on by Robichaud. Since losing Martha, Robichaud has become the coordinator of the Saola Working Group (SWG) at the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). He has dedicated his life to saving this critically endangered species – and believes the best chance to achieve that now is through a captive breeding programme. “We need to act while there is still time,” he said adding that “seldom, if ever” are captive breeding programs begun too soon for species on the edge. “More likely, too late.” We just found the saola – and now we’re very close to losing it forever. Discovery Hardly a household name, the saola was one of the most astounding biological discoveries of the 20th Century. In 1992, a group of scientists met a local hunter in Vietnam who gave them a skull of something no biologist had ever seen before. The animal – the saola or Pseudoryx nghetinhensis – was a large-bodied terrestrial mammal (80-100kg) that somehow eluded science, though not local people, well into the information age.
    [Show full text]