Executive Summary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Executive Summary DRAFT Cape Fear River Basin Water Supply Plan NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources March 2009 Draft CFRB – WSP March 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 4 1 Existing Water Resources and Water Balances ....................................................................12 1.1 Basin Summary ............................................................................................................. 12 (a) Basin Description .................................................................................................... 12 (b) Major Flow Modification .......................................................................................... 13 1.2 Hydrology ...................................................................................................................... 15 (a) Surface Water ......................................................................................................... 15 (i) Surface water Availability and Reliability ................................................................ 15 (ii) Basin Model Description and Assumptions ............................................................ 22 (b) Ground Water ......................................................................................................... 51 (c) Instream Flow ......................................................................................................... 63 (i) Instream and Offstream Water Use ........................................................................ 63 (ii) Quantifying Instream Flow Needs........................................................................... 64 (iii) Maintaining Ecological Integrity .............................................................................. 68 (iv) The Existing Review Process for Instream Flows .................................................. 69 (v) Incorporating Instream Flow Needs in Basinwide Modeling and Planning ............ 69 1.3 Climatology .................................................................................................................... 75 (a) Precipitation ............................................................................................................ 75 (b) Temperature ........................................................................................................... 78 1.4 Water Quality ................................................................................................................. 79 2 Water Management ...............................................................................................................80 2.1 Drought Response Plan and Implementations ............................................................. 80 2.2 Interbasin Transfer ........................................................................................................ 85 2.3 Data Management Needs ............................................................................................. 88 References: ....................................................................................................................................90 Appendices .....................................................................................................................................92 1. County Summary…………………………………………………………………………………3 (a) Demographics……………………..……………………………………………………...4 (b) Local Water Supply Plans, County Populations and Growth Trends……………….5 2. Basin Specific Issues………………………………..………………………………………….17 (a) FERC – Hydropower……………………………….………………...……………….…17 (b) The Use of Water Supply on Jordan Lake…………………………………….………20 3. Instream Flow Needs……………………………………………………………………………21 4. Drought …………………………………………………………………………………………...30 5. Ground Water……………………………………………………………...……….……………40 6. Interbasin Transfer………………………………………………………………………………58 i Draft CFRB – WSP March 2009 LIST OF TABLES Table - 1: Cape Fear River Basin HUs .......................................................................................... 12 Table - 2: Cape Fear Water Supply Reservoirs ........................................................................... 14 Table - 3: Cape Fear Lock and Dam ............................................................................................. 14 Table - 4: List of USGS Unregulated Streamflow Gage Stations ................................................. 15 Table - 5: Randleman Lake Releases ........................................................................................... 28 Table - 6: Demands and Discharges Assumed in the Modeling (All units are in MGD) ............... 29 Table - 7: Water Supply Demand Deficits Predicted by the OASIS Model ................................... 34 Table - 8: System Inflows Reduced to 80% of Historical Natural Inflows Under 2050 demands .. 35 Table - 9: Jordan Lake Reservoir Operating Rules during Drought .............................................. 37 Table - 10: Jordan Lake Allocation (all units in MGD) ................................................................... 40 Table - 11: County Summary of Cape Fear River Basin Wells .................................................... 58 Table - 12: Modified Tennant Method Guidelines for Preliminary Screening of Instream Flow Concerns ....................................................................................................................................... 70 Table - 13: Stream Condition: Middle Deep River (Node 280) ..................................................... 72 Table - 14: Stream Condition: Middle Deep River (Node 280) ..................................................... 73 Table - 15: Stream Condition: Middle Deep River (Node 280) ..................................................... 74 Table - 16: Water Shortage Response Plan Data ......................................................................... 82 ii Draft CFRB – WSP March 2009 LIST OF FIGURES Figure - 1: Map of Cape Fear River Basin HUs ............................................................................. 13 Figure - 2: Map of 6 USGS Unregulated Streamflow Gage Stations ............................................ 15 Figure - 3: Monthly Mean Flow in Cubic Feet per Second ........................................................... 16 Figure - 4: Monthly Maximum Stream Flow in Cubic Feet per Second ........................................ 17 Figure - 5: Monthly Minimum Stream Flow in Cubic Feet per Second ......................................... 17 Figure - 6: Unit Mean Flow Statistics in Cubic Feet per Second / Square Mile of Drainage Area 18 Figure - 7: Unit Maximum Flow Statistics ...................................................................................... 19 Figure - 8: Unit Minimum Flow Statistics ....................................................................................... 19 Figure - 9: Flow Duration Plots for Period of Record – Log Scale ................................................ 20 Figure - 10: Flow Duration Plots for Period of Record................................................................... 21 Figure - 11: Cape Fear Hydrologic Model Schematic .................................................................. 24 Figure - 12: Cape Fear Hydrologic Model Detailed Schematic .................................................... 25 Figure - 13: Jordan Lake Storage Volume .................................................................................... 36 Figure - 14: Jordan Lake Elevation Profile .................................................................................... 39 Figure - 15: Jordan Lake Water Supply Pool Profile – Demands Scenarios ................................ 42 Figure - 16: Jordan Lake Water Supply Pool Profile – 100 MGD Scenario .................................. 43 Figure - 17: Jordan Lake Water Supply Pool Profile – 80% Inflows ............................................. 44 Figure - 18: Jordan Lake Water Quality Pool Profile – Demands Scenarios ............................... 46 Figure - 19: Jordan Lake Water Quality Pool Profile – 100 MGD Water Supply Demand ............ 47 Figure - 20: Jordan Lake Water Quality Pool Profile – 80% Inflow ............................................... 48 Figure - 21: Jordan Lake Boating Impacts ................................................................................... 50 Figure - 22: Hydrogeologic Cross Sections in CFRB (vertically exaggerated) ............................ 54 Figure - 23: Typical Water Budgets for the (a)Coastal Plain and (b)Piedmont Portions of CFRB 55 Figure - 24 Upper CFRB with and without Heath (1994) Recharge Rates ................................... 62 Figure - 25: Instream Flow Study Sites in the Cape Fear River Basin, NC................................... 67 Figure - 26: Stream Condition Middle Deep River, Dec-Feb ......................................................... 72 Figure - 27: Stream Condition Middle Deep River, March-May .................................................... 73 Figure - 28: Stream Condition Deep River, Jun-Nov ..................................................................... 74 Figure - 29: Map of Five SERCC Weather Stations ...................................................................... 76 Figure - 30: Average Annual Precipitation ..................................................................................... 77 Figure - 31: Average Monthly Rainfall ..........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • An Archaeological Inventory of Alamance County, North Carolina
    AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVENTORY OF ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Alamance County Historic Properties Commission August, 2019 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVENTORY OF ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA A SPECIAL PROJECT OF THE ALAMANCE COUNTY HISTORIC PROPERTIES COMMISSION August 5, 2019 This inventory is an update of the Alamance County Archaeological Survey Project, published by the Research Laboratories of Anthropology, UNC-Chapel Hill in 1986 (McManus and Long 1986). The survey project collected information on 65 archaeological sites. A total of 177 archaeological sites had been recorded prior to the 1986 project making a total of 242 sites on file at the end of the survey work. Since that time, other archaeological sites have been added to the North Carolina site files at the Office of State Archaeology, Department of Natural and Cultural Resources in Raleigh. The updated inventory presented here includes 410 sites across the county and serves to make the information current. Most of the information in this document is from the original survey and site forms on file at the Office of State Archaeology and may not reflect the current conditions of some of the sites. This updated inventory was undertaken as a Special Project by members of the Alamance County Historic Properties Commission (HPC) and published in-house by the Alamance County Planning Department. The goals of this project are three-fold and include: 1) to make the archaeological and cultural heritage of the county more accessible to its citizens; 2) to serve as a planning tool for the Alamance County Planning Department and provide aid in preservation and conservation efforts by the county planners; and 3) to serve as a research tool for scholars studying the prehistory and history of Alamance County.
    [Show full text]
  • List of North Carolina Bridges
    3/31/21 Division County Number DOT # Route Across Year Built Posted SV Posted TTST 7 Alamance 2 000002 SR1529 PRONG OF HAW RIVER 1998 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 3 000003 SR1529 DRY CREEK 1954 20 29 7 Alamance 6 000006 SR1504 TRAVIS CREEK 2004 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 7 000007 SR1504 TICKLE CREEK 2009 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 11 000011 NC54 HAW RIVER 2001 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 12 000012 NC62 BIG ALAMANCE CREEK 1999 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 13 000013 SR1530 HAW RIVER 2002 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 14 000014 NC87 CANE CREEK 1929 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 15 000015 SR1530 HAW RIVER 1957 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 16 000016 NC119 I40, I85 1994 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 18 000018 SR1561 HAW RIVER 2004 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 22 000022 SR1001 MINE CREEK 1951 23 30 7 Alamance 23 000023 SR1001 STONEY CREEK 1991 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 24 000024 SR1581 STONY CREEK 1960 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 26 000026 NC62 GUNN CREEK 1949 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 27 000027 SR1002 BUTTERMILK CREEK 2004 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 28 000028 SR1587 BUTTERMILK CREEK 1986 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 31 000031 SR1584 BUTTERMILK CREEK 2005 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 32 000032 SR1582 BUTTERMILK CREEK 2012 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 33 000033 NC49 STINKING QUARTER CREEK 1980 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 34 000034 NC54 BACK CREEK 1973 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 35 000035 NC62 HAW RIVER 1958 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 36 000036 SR1613 TOM'S CREEK 1960 35 41 7 Alamance 37 000037 SR1611 PRONG STONEY CREEK 2013 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 38 000038 SR1611 STONEY CREEK 1960 33 39 7 Alamance 39 000039 SR1584 PRONG BUTTERMILK CREEK 1995 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 40 000040 NC87 BRANCH OF VARNALS CREEK 1929 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 41 000041 SR1002 STONEY CREEK 1960 34 37 7 Alamance 42 000042 SR1002 TOM'S CREEK 1960 34 38 7 Alamance 43 000043 SR1763 JORDAN CREEK 1995 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 44 000044 SR1768 JORDAN'S CREEK 1968 5 0 7 Alamance 45 000045 SR1002 JORDAN CREEK 2008 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 47 000047 SR1226 I40, I85 2004 LGW LGW This report includes NC Bridges that are less than 20' in length.
    [Show full text]
  • The John Allen House and Tryon's Palace: Icons of the North Carolina
    LIBERTY UNIVERSITY The John Allen House and Tryon’s Palace: Icons of the North Carolina Regulator Movement A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History By H. Gilbert Bradshaw LYNCHBURG, VIRGINIA 2020 Table of Contents Abstract .............................................................................................................................. iii Chapter 1: “A Well-Documented Picture of North Carolina History” ..................................... 1 Chapter 2: “Valley of Humility Between Two Mountains of Conceit” ................................. 28 Chapter 3: “The Growing Weight of Oppression Which We Lye Under” ............................ 48 Chapter 4: “Great Elegance in Taste and Workmanship” ...................................................... 70 Chapter 5: “We Have Until Very Recently Neglected Our Historical Sites” ....................... 101 Bibliography ................................................................................................................... 133 ii “For there are deeds that should not pass away, And names that must not wither.” – Plaque in St. Philip’s Church Brunswick Town, North Carolina iii Abstract A defining feature of North Carolina is her geography. English colonists who founded the first settlements in the east adapted their old lifestyles to their new environs, and as a result, a burgeoning planter and merchant class emerged throughout the Tidewater and coastal regions. This eastern gentry replicated the customs, manners,
    [Show full text]
  • The University of North Carolina at Greensboro JACKSON LIBRARY V
    The University of North Carolina at Greensboro JACKSON LIBRARY v>\ CQ 'flTX.V no.837 Gift of: Gary J. Tucker COLLEGE COLLECTION TUCKER, GARY J. The Formative Period of Religion in Guilford County. (1971) Directed by: Dr. Blackwell Robinson. Pp. 89. The first settlers in Guilford County were the German, Scotch-Irish, and English Immigrants who came to the Piedmont of North Carolina in search of economic and religious freedom. These people represented the Lutheran, German Reformed, Quaker, Presbyterian, Baptist, and, at a later date, the Methodist denominations. The purpose of this paper is to examine the actions of the people in relation to their religious beliefs during the early period of settlement. The period of time in study ranges from the arrival of the first German settlers in the early 17^0's to the climax of the Great Revival in North Carolina in 1805. During the intervening years, there were many problems which these people had to solve. Shortly after their arrival they were faced with economic and religious problems which culminated in the Regulator War. Soon after that conflict, there followed the American Revolutionary War, with its local and national problems. How the people and their religious denominations were affected by this struggle is examined in this thesis. It is also the intent of this paper to answer some similar questions: How did the people, in accordance with their religious beliefs, choose which side to support during the struggle? Why did some remain loyal while others supported the Whigs? What personal factors motivated their choice? How influential were their ministers in deciding the matter? Following the Revolution, there was a decline in religion.
    [Show full text]
  • Alamance County Community Assessment
    2015 Alamance County Community Assessment Working Together to Improve the Health & Well-being of Alamance County Education Economy Access to Care Alamance County Community Assessment 2015 Contents Acknowledgements iv Executive Summary 1 Chapter 1: Background and Introduction 2 Chapter 2: Brief County Description 3 Chapter 3: Community Assessment Process 4 Chapter 4: Community Concerns and Priorities 7 Chapter 5: Health and Well-being Data 14 Mortality 14 Morbidity 15 Chronic Disease 16 Cancer 16 Heart Disease and Stroke 17 Diabetes 17 Infectious Diseases 18 Influenza and Pneumonia 18 Tuberculosis 19 Sexually Transmitted Infections 19 Gonorrhea 19 Syphilis 19 HIV/AIDS 20 Obesity 21 Oral Health 22 Lead Poisoning 23 Mental Health 23 Prenatal, Infant, & Maternal Health 24 Mortality 24 Pregnancy, Prenatal Care and Adolescent Pregnancy 25 Supporting Maternal and Child Health in Alamance County 26 Health Care 26 Healthcare Satisfaction 26 Access to Healthcare: Providers and Insurance Coverage 27 Emergency Department Usage 29 SOCIAL DETERMINANTS 29 Healthy Days and Disability 30 Education 30 Families 32 Neighborhoods 34 Crime/intentional Injuries 34 Intentional Injuries 35 Social Support/Civic Engagement 36 Religion 36 Financial & Economic Factors 36 ii | P a g e Alamance County Community Assessment 2015 Financial Assistance 36 Transportation 38 Individual Behavior 38 Income/Poverty Levels 38 Employment Rates 39 Homeownership Rates 39 Food Insecurity/Access to Healthy Foods 40 Substance Use 40 Overweight and Obesity 40 Physical Activity and Nutrition 41 Family Planning 41 Motor Vehicle Injuries 42 Health Screenings Overview 42 Physical Environment 42 Pollution & Air Quality 42 Water Quality 43 Recreation 44 Chapter 6: Promotion of Health & Well-being 44 COUNTY DATA BOOK 51 Appendix A: Acknowledgements 52 Appendix B: Additional Data and Information 53 Appendix C: Citations and Resources 108 iii | P a g e Alamance County Community Assessment 2015 In memory of Barry Bass – A native of Charlotte, Barry was a veteran of the U.
    [Show full text]
  • Piedmont Triad Regional Trail Plan and Inventory
    Piedmont Triad Regional Trail Plan and Inventory Final Report Spring 2011 Piedmont Triad Regional Trail Plan & Inventory – DRAFT Spring 2011 i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project was made possible with funding from the Federal Recreational Trails Program, a grant program managed by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the Division of Parks and Recreation and its State Trails Program and the Piedmont Triad Council of Governments. The report, mapping and public involvement was completed by the Piedmont Triad Council of Governments with assistance from local governments and the State Parks Trails Program. A special thanks to all the people who participated in the planning process, adding value to this report and tirelessly working to develop more opportunities to get out and enjoy the outdoors for fitness, recreation and transportation. Wilmington Building, Suite 201 2216 W. Meadowview Road Greensboro, NC 27407-3480 (336) 294-4950 www.ptcog.org 1615 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1615 (919) 715-8699 www.ncparks.gov Piedmont Triad Regional Trail Plan & Inventory – DRAFT Spring 2011 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................... ii OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 STUDY AREA .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • T.P. ST!:;JH:N DAVIS, )R. an ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND
    t.P. ST!:;JH:n DAVIS, )r. AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSED GREAT ALAMANCE CREEK SEWER LINE ROUTE, ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA by I. Randolph Daniel, Jr. Technical Report No. 22 Research Laboratories of Anthropology University of North Carolina Chapel Hill September, 1995 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSED GREAT ALAMANCE CREEK SEWER LINE ROUTE, ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA by I. Randolph Daniel, Jr. Technical Report No. 22 Research Laboratories of Anthropology University of North Carolina Chapel Hill September, 1995 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY An archaeological survey and cultural resource assessment was carried out along the proposed Big Alamance Creek Sewer Line route in Alamance County, North Carolina. The proposed corridor will run about 11 miles along the north side of Big Alamance and Back creeks with two additional corridor segments that will run northward for about one mile each along two tributaries of Big Alamance Creek. Field survey consisted of a combination of surface reconnaissance and shovel testing. As a result of this investigation, four new archaeological sites (designated 31Am364 to 31Am367) were located and assessed. One of these (31Am364) is a prehistoric site located just outside the proposed corridor. This site consists solely of a light surface scatter of stone flaking debris, probably dating to the Archaic period, and does not meet the minimum stand­ ards to be considered significant by National Register of Historic Places criteria. Therefore, no further archaeological work is recommended. The other three sites contain historic remains. Two of these sites, a dam (31Am366) and a mill race (31Am367), are nineteenth-century facilities, while the third site (31Am365) represents the remains of an early twentieth-century structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3: Planning Area Profile
    Section 3: Planning Area Profile This section provides a general overview of the Eno-Haw Region which has been defined as the planning area for this Plan. It consists of the following four subsections: 3.1 Geography and the Environment 3.2 Population, Housing, and Demographics 3.3 Infrastructure and Land Use 3.4 Employment and Industry 3.1 Geography and the Environment The Eno-Haw Region is comprised of three contiguous counties in the central region of North Carolina: Alamance County, Orange County, and Durham County. A map profiling the planning area is shown in Figure 3.1. Table 3.1 shows total land and water area for the three counties and for the Eno-Haw Region as a whole. Table 3.1: Total Land and Water Area for the Eno-Haw Region Total Land Area Total Water Area Total Area County (In Square Miles) (In Square Miles) (In Square Miles) Alamance 430 5 435 Orange 398 3 401 Durham 290 7 297 TOTAL ENO-HAW 1,118 15 1,133 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010. Alamance County Alamance County comprises the Burlington, NC Metropolitan Statistical Area, which is also included in the Greensboro-Winston-Salem-High Point, NC Combined Statistical Area. The 2012 estimated population of the metropolitan area was 153,920. Alamance County was named after Great Alamance Creek, site of the Battle of Alamance (May 16, 1771), a pre-Revolutionary War battle in which militia under the command of Governor William Tryon crushed the Regulator movement. Great Alamance Creek, and in turn Little Alamance Creek, according to legend, were named after a local Native American word to describe the blue mud that was found at the bottom of the creeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Piedmont Triad Regional Trail Plan and Inventory
    Piedmont Triad Regional Trail Plan and Inventory Final Report Spring 2011 Piedmont Triad Regional Trail Plan & Inventory – DRAFT Spring 2011 i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project was made possible with funding from the Federal Recreational Trails Program, a grant program managed by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the Division of Parks and Recreation and its State Trails Program and the Piedmont Triad Council of Governments. The report, mapping and public involvement was completed by the Piedmont Triad Council of Governments with assistance from local governments and the State Parks Trails Program. A special thanks to all the people who participated in the planning process, adding value to this report and tirelessly working to develop more opportunities to get out and enjoy the outdoors for fitness, recreation and transportation. Wilmington Building, Suite 201 2216 W. Meadowview Road Greensboro, NC 27407-3480 (336) 294-4950 www.ptcog.org 1615 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1615 (919) 715-8699 www.ncparks.gov Piedmont Triad Regional Trail Plan & Inventory – DRAFT Spring 2011 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 STUDY AREA .................................................................................................................................................. 1 PURPOSE ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Centennial History of Alamance County, 1849-1949
    lHKU i i r ; iTsij;iui':«; * « *;I^I;:5 iI ->J-- ALAMANCE COUNTY 1849-1949 , RP!Wn SS?^S^5!'" 1 ij i : i T.TT 7 T"'TjT.TT! :6iMMBwM^^Mmmmm^^ rm-ffi&MAJ&iiMKft z — °^ * o 3 U — 8 lODC o a -p o) - c s E -5 g) I uj S <o -s . ^* °* w o.E <-. fttmjo Hdioa Nva THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL THE COLLECTION OF NORTH CAROLINIANA ENDOWED BY JOHN SPRUNT HILL CLASS OF 1889 FOR USE ONLY IN THE NORTH CAROLINA COLLECTION 1975 ALAMANCE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIEIF COLONEL W. CLIFF ELDER, PRES. CENTENNIAL HISTORY OF ALAMANCE COUNTY Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/centennialhistorwhit CENTENNIAL HISTORY OF ALAMANCE COUNTY 1849-1949 WALTER WHITAKER in collaboration with STALEY A. COOK and A. HOWARD WHITE ALAMANCE COUNTY HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION Burlington, North Carolina In order that material from this book can be used as widely as possible, it does not carry a copyright. Proper credit to the source of information, however, will be appreciated. Second Printing 1974 Printed in the United States by The Seeman Printery, Inc. Division of Fisher-Harrison Corp. Durham, North Carolina TO MY MOTHER AND FATHER "Prince, all enquiry will be vain Of weeks or years where they repose; No answer comes but this refrain: But where, ah where be last year's snows?" Francois Villon Harry S. Truman President The United States of America 1945 — THE WHITE HOUSE WASH I NGTON January 31, 1949 TO THE CITIZENS OF ALAIvIANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA: An historical anniversary such as you are to celebrate this year is an important occasion to you and a valuabLs contribution to the general life of your com- munity, state and nation.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Cape Fear River Surface Water Supply Evaluation
    Cape Fear River Surface Water Supply Evaluation Prepared for the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission by the N. C. Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources December 2016 Cape Fear River Surface Water Supply Evaluation December 2016 Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... 3 2 Summary Discussion ......................................................................................................................... 5 3 B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake ................................................................................................. 9 4 The Cape Fear - Neuse River Basins Hydrologic Model ............................................... 13 5 Conclusions ......................................................................................................................................... 21 6 Discussion ............................................................................................................................................ 23 7 Water Sources ................................................................................................................................... 26 8 Expected Service Populations ................................................................................................... 35 9 Water Demands ................................................................................................................................ 37
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Community Health Assessment
    2015 Alamance County Community Assessment Working Together to Improve the Health & Well-being of Alamance County Education Economy Access to Care Alamance Community Assessment 2015 Contents Acknowledgements iv Executive Summary 1 Chapter 1: Background and Introduction 2 Chapter 2: Brief County Description 3 Chapter 3: Community Assessment Process 4 Chapter 4: Community Concerns and Priorities 7 Chapter 5: Health and Well-being Data 14 Mortality 14 Morbidity 15 Chronic Disease 16 Cancer 16 Heart Disease and Stroke 17 Diabetes 17 Infectious Diseases 18 Influenza and Pneumonia 18 Tuberculosis 19 Sexually Transmitted Infections 19 Gonorrhea 19 Syphilis 19 HIV/AIDS 20 Obesity 21 Oral Health 22 Lead Poisoning 23 Mental Health 23 Prenatal, Infant, & Maternal Health 24 Mortality 24 Pregnancy, Prenatal Care and Adolescent Pregnancy 25 Supporting Maternal and Child Health in Alamance County 26 Health Care 26 Healthcare Satisfaction 26 Access to Healthcare: Providers and Insurance Coverage 27 Emergency Department Usage 29 SOCIAL DETERMINANTS 29 Healthy Days and Disability 30 Education 30 Families 32 Neighborhoods 34 Crime/intentional Injuries 34 Intentional Injuries 35 Social Support/Civic Engagement 36 Religion 36 Financial & Economic Factors 36 ii | P a g e Alamance Community Assessment 2015 Financial Assistance 36 Transportation 38 Individual Behavior 38 Income/Poverty Levels 38 Employment Rates 39 Homeownership Rates 39 Food Insecurity/Access to Healthy Foods 40 Substance Use 40 Overweight and Obesity 40 Physical Activity and Nutrition 41 Family Planning 41 Motor Vehicle Injuries 42 Health Screenings Overview 42 Physical Environment 42 Pollution & Air Quality 42 Water Quality 43 Recreation 44 Chapter 6: Promotion of Health & Well-being 44 COUNTY DATA BOOK 51 Appendix A: Acknowledgements 52 Appendix B: Additional Data and Information 53 Appendix C: Citations and Resources 108 iii | P a g e Alamance Community Assessment 2015 In memory of Barry Bass – A native of Charlotte, Barry was a veteran of the U.
    [Show full text]