DOCSLIB.ORG

Consolidation DEIS Appendix B: JEH Transportation Impact Assesment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Consolidation DEIS Appendix B: JEH Transportation Impact Assesment FBI Headquarters Consolidation Appendix B: Draft Transportation Impact Assessment: J. Edgar Hoover Parcel Appendix B Federal Bureau of Investigation Headquarters Consolidation Draft Transportation Impact Assessment J Edgar Hoover Parcel Prepared by for October 2015 Table of Contents LIST OF APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................................ III LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................................................... IV LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................................................. VII 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Proposed Action........................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.3 NEPA Requirements .................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.4 Local Land Use Plans .................................................................................................................. 2-4 2.4.1 Existing Land Use ............................................................................................................ 2-4 2.4.2 Planning Context ............................................................................................................. 2-7 2.4.3 Comprehensive Plan for the National Capital ................................................................. 2-7 2.4.4 The Pennsylvania Avenue Initiative ................................................................................ 2-8 2.4.5 Monumental Core Framework Plan ................................................................................. 2-8 2.4.6 DC Retail Action Strategy: Downtown-East End ............................................................. 2-8 2.4.7 MoveDC: The District of Columbia’s Multi-modal Long-Range Transportation Plan ...... 2-9 2.4.8 Streetcar Land Use Study ............................................................................................... 2-9 2.4.9 2014 DC Circulator Transit Development Plan Update ................................................... 2-9 2.5 Transportation Assumption Agreement .................................................................................. 2-10 3.0 EXISTING CONDITION: FBI HQ STUDY AREA ...................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1.1 Study Area Description .................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 Study Area Accessibility .................................................................................................. 3-2 3.1.3 Roadway Descriptions ..................................................................................................... 3-3 3.1.4 Data Collection ................................................................................................................ 3-5 3.2 Pedestrian Network .................................................................................................................... 3-13 3.2.1 Overall Sidewalk Observations ..................................................................................... 3-13 3.2.2 Accessibility Compliance ............................................................................................... 3-13 3.3 Bicycle Network ......................................................................................................................... 3-14 3.3.1 Capital Bikeshare .......................................................................................................... 3-16 3.3.2 Trip Purpose .................................................................................................................. 3-17 3.3.3 Ridership Patterns ......................................................................................................... 3-17 3.3.4 Station Use .................................................................................................................... 3-18 3.4 Public Transit .............................................................................................................................. 3-19 3.4.1 Metrorail ......................................................................................................................... 3-20 3.4.2 Bus: Local Metrobus ...................................................................................................... 3-40 3.4.3 Bus: Commuter .............................................................................................................. 3-60 3.4.4 Ridesharing/Slugging .................................................................................................... 3-63 3.4.5 Carsharing ..................................................................................................................... 3-63 3.4.6 Shuttles .......................................................................................................................... 3-64 3.5 Parking ........................................................................................................................................ 3-65 3.6 Truck Access .............................................................................................................................. 3-67 3.7 Traffic Analysis........................................................................................................................... 3-67 FBI Headquarters Consolidation U.S. General Services Administration i Transportation Impact Assessment J. Edgar Hoover Parcel 3.7.1 Analysis Tools ............................................................................................................... 3-67 3.7.2 Intersection Operations Analysis Method ...................................................................... 3-68 3.7.3 Intersection Queuing Analysis Method .......................................................................... 3-71 3.7.4 Existing Condition Intersection Operations Analysis ..................................................... 3-72 3.7.5 Existing Condition Intersection Queuing Analysis ......................................................... 3-87 3.8 Crash Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 3-96 4.0 ANALYSIS OF NO-ACTION ALTERNATIVE ........................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 No-action Improvements ............................................................................................................. 4-1 4.1.1 Planned Developments ................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.2 Planned Roadway Improvements ................................................................................... 4-2 4.2 Pedestrian Network ...................................................................................................................... 4-3 4.3 Bicycle Network ........................................................................................................................... 4-4 4.4 Public Transit ................................................................................................................................ 4-6 4.4.1 Projected Transit Growth ................................................................................................. 4-6 4.4.2 Metrorail Analysis ............................................................................................................ 4-7 4.4.3 Metrobus Analysis ......................................................................................................... 4-16 4.4.4 Level of Impact .............................................................................................................. 4-17 4.5 Parking ........................................................................................................................................ 4-18 4.6 Truck Access .............................................................................................................................. 4-19 4.7 Traffic Analysis........................................................................................................................... 4-19 4.7.1 Background Growth ....................................................................................................... 4-19 4.7.2 Trip Generation and Modal Split .................................................................................... 4-20 4.7.3 Trip Distribution ............................................................................................................. 4-23 4.7.4 Development of No-action Alternative ..........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Distrito De Columbia
    DISTRITO DE COLUMBIA Cambios propuestos al servicio de Metrobus FRIENDSHIP HEIGHTS-SOUTHEASTL LINE – RUTAS 30N Y 30S PRESUPUESTO • DISMINUCIÓN DE $170,000 en subsidios. CAMBIOS PROPUESTOS • Eliminar este servicio y reemplazarlo por: servicios de las rutas 31, 33 entre el centro, Georgetown y la estación de Metrorail de Friendship Heights; servicios adicionales de las rutas 32, 36 entre el centro, Capital Hill y la estaciones de Metrorail de Naylor Road y Southern Avenue. • Los servicios a altas horas de la noche de las rutas 32 y 33 funcionarían cada 30 minutos después de la 1 a.m. • Las rutas 32 y 36 se coordinarían con las rutas 31 y 33 en las paradas principales de transferencia en el centro, para minimizar los tiempos de espera de los usuarios que utilizan los servicios de la ruta para atravesar el área metropolitana. SERVICIO ALTERNO • Las rutas 31 y 33 entre el centro, Georgetown y la estación de Metrorail de Friendship Heights. • Las rutas 32 y 36 entre el centro, Capitol Hill y las estaciones de Metrorail de Naylor Road y Southern Avenue. • La ruta 39 de MetroExtra entre el centro, Capitol Hill, Fairfax Village y la estación de Metrorail de Naylor Road. MOTIVOS DEL CAMBIO • Mejoramiento de la puntualidad mediante la eliminación de rutas largas que atraviesan el área metropolitana. • Los usuarios contarían con servicios más frecuentes en las rutas 31, 32, 33 y 36, más cortas, con opciones de transferencia coordinadas hacia el centro. • Simplificación del patrón de rutas en el corredor de Pennsylvania Avenue/Wisconsin Avenue. MEDIDAS DE RENDIMIENTO • De los pasajeros que viajan entre ubicaciones al este de Archives y al oeste de Washington Circle, que son aproximadamente 1000 (19%) en días entre semana (de lunes a viernes), 750 (18%) los sábados y 800 (21%) los domingos, tendrían que realizar transferencia de los servicios de las rutas 31, 33 o 32 a los de las rutas 32 o 36 para lograr atravesar el área metropolitana.
    [Show full text]
  • March 18, 2019 and Reviewed the Policies on the Agenda and Recommends Them for Approval
    806 The Board Meeting ofthe Voorhees Township Board of Education was held on Monday, March 18,2019 at 7:34 PM at the Administration Building, Bruce Karpf, Vice-President, presiding. The Voorhees Township Board ofEducation uses a Rolling Agenda concept. Items that are listedfor a vote on the public board agenda are sent to the Board ofEducation members weekly as information items. Each member has the ability to request topic to be discussed in Committee meetings as needed. 1. PUBLIC NOTICE Public notice ofthis meeting pursuant to the Open Public Meetings Act has been given by the Board Secretary in the following manner: 1. Posting written notice on the official bulletin board at the Voorhees Township Public Schools Administrative Building on March 4, 2019. 2. Sending written notice to the Courier Post on March 4, 2019. 3. Filing written notice with the Clerk of Voorhees Township on March 4, 2019. II. SALlJTE TO TIlE FLAG III. ROLLCALL Present Absent Barbara Dunleavy Rachel van Aken Dana Galiano Dr. Marissa Levy Richard Nelson John Schmus Monica Watson Bruce Karpf, Vice-President Dawn Wallace, President (Arrived at 7:37 PM) Dr. Barry J. Galasso, Interim Superintendent Helen G. Haley, Business Administrator/Board Secretary Howard Mendelson, Attorney IV. 1. Motion by Dr. Levy, seconded by Mrs. Schmus, to approve the minutes ofthe meeting of February 27, 2019. Motion carried, 7 ayes. VOORHEES TOWNSHIP MARCI-I 18, 2019 807 2. Motion by Mrs. Watson, seconded by Dr. Levy, to approve the minutes of the March 11,2019 meeting and the executive session meetings of: a.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles - Glendale - Burbank Corridor Feasibility Study Final Report 21 October 2019
    Los Angeles - Glendale - Burbank Corridor Feasibility Study Final Report 21 October 2019 Prepared by: In association with: IBI Group Terry A Hayes Associates HDR Translink RSE Epic Land Solutions RSG Costin Public Outreach Group LOS ANGELES GLENDALE BURBANK CORRIDOR FEASIBILITY STUDY FINAL REPORT PREPARED FOR Metro Regional Rail One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA October 21, 2019 IN ASSOCIATION WITH: IBI Group HDR RSE RSG Terry A. Hayes Associates Translink Epic Land Solutions Costin Public Outreach Group Los Angeles-Glendale-Burbank Corridor Feasibility Study Final Report October 2019 This page intentionally left blank. Page ii Los Angeles-Glendale-Burbank Corridor Feasibility Study Final Report October 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................. 1 Project Purpose...................................................................................................................... 1 Background ............................................................................................................................ 1 Feasibility Study Objectives ................................................................................................... 2 Study Findings ....................................................................................................................... 5 Study Resolution ...................................................................................................................10 1. INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Adopted April 8Th, 2014 by Ordinance No
    CITY OF TROUTDALE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Adopted April 8th, 2014 by Ordinance no. 820 Prepared for: Prepared by: City of Troutdale Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 219 E Historic Columbia River Highway 610 SW Alder, Suite 700 Troutdale, Oregon 97060 Portland, Oregon 97205 503.665.5175 503.228.5230 www.kittelson.com Transportation System Plan Troutdale Transportation System Plan Troutdale, Oregon Prepared For: City of Troutdale 219 E Historic Columbia River Highway Troutdale, Oregon 97060 (503) 665-5175 Prepared By: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 610 SW Alder, Suite 700 Portland, OR 97205 (503) 228-5230 Project Manager: Matt Hughart, AICP Project Principal: Mark Vandehey, P.E. Project No. 12560.0 March 2014 Table of Contents Transportation System Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... 1-1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................................................................. 1-1 Goals and Policies ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1-2 Transportation Plans ................................................................................................................................................................ 1-3 Financing ...............................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Demand-Responsive Transportation Systems
    I ~ I CleGFi nolOiQ· U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA·TION OF THE SECRETARY I , ...~Sharing OFFICE AND URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION ~ :::0 :....­ c:, •r• C, STATE-OF-THE-ART I OVERVIEW ...c: AUGUST 1974 HE 5620 dcmand-,c,pon,iUc +P3 D45 Urnill~~[POO[I]UffiU~OO~ ~ - w•on J --- ~·~ - This document has been prepared by the Transportation Systems Center and is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Trans­ portation in the interest of information exchange. FOREWORD On March 16, 1972, the President sent a special message to Congress wherein he called "for a strong new effort to marshal! science and technology in the work of strengthening our economy and improving the quality of our life." In this message he stated that in the final analysis," the progress we seek requires a new partnership in science and technology-­ one which brings together the Federal Government, private enterprise, State and local governments, and our universities and research centers in a coordinated, cooperative effort to serve the national interest." As part of its ongoing commitment to this principle of technology-sharing, the U.S. Department of Transportation has initiated a series of publications based on research and development efforts sponsored by the Department. The series comprises technical reports, state-of-the-art documents, newsletters and bulletins, manuals and handbooks, bibliographies, and other special publications. All share a primary objective: to contri­ bute to a better base of knowledge and understanding throughout the transportation community, and, thereby, to an improvement in the basis for decision-making within the community. This title in the series presents an overview of demand responsive transportation, an innovative approach that may help fill the need for flexibility in public transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • 723-14 M34 M34a Sbs M&S Layout 1
    Bus Timetable Effective as of August 31, 2014 M34/ M34A Via 34 St M34 – between Javits Convention Center and Eastside Ferry Terminal M34A – between Waterside Plaza and Port Authority Bus Terminal If you think your bus operator deserves an Apple Award – our special recognition for service, courtesy and professionalism – call 511 and give us the badge or bus number. ¯˘¿ Fares – MetroCard® is accepted for all MTA New York City trains (including Staten Island Railway - SIR), and, local, Limited-Stop and +SelectBusService buses (at MetroCard fare collection machines). Express buses only accept 7-Day Express Bus Plus MetroCard or Pay-Per-Ride MetroCard. All of our buses and +SelectBusService Coin Fare Collector machines accept exact fare in coins. Dollar bills, pennies, and half-dollar coins are not accepted. Free Transfers – Unlimited Ride MetroCard permits free transfers to all but our express buses (between subway and local bus, local bus and local bus etc.) Pay-Per-Ride MetroCard allows one free transfer of equal or lesser value if you complete your transfer within two hours of the time you pay your full fare with the same MetroCard. If you pay your local bus fare with coins, ask for a free electronic paper transfer to use on another local bus. Reduced-Fare Benefits – You are eligible for reduced-fare benefits if you are at least 65 years of age or have a qualifying disability. Benefits are available (except on peak-hour express buses) with proper identification, including Reduced-Fare MetroCard or Medicare card (Medicaid cards do not qualify). Children – The subway, SIR, local, Limited-Stop, and +SelectBusService buses permit up to three children, 44 inches tall and under to ride free when accompanied by an adult paying full fare.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Productivity for Intralogistics Robust Industrial Pick-To-Light Solutions Let’S Connect
    Greater productivity for intralogistics Robust industrial Pick-to-Light solutions Let’s connect. Intralogistics Increase efficiency and avoid errors Pick-to-Light and Put-to-Light Precise picking and feeding for intralogistics Solutions at a glance The acceleration of production working processes, flexible adjustments to meet Pick-to-Light (P2L) solutions are installed in the picking or withdrawal area. fluctuations in demand and the growing need for customised products are presen- The compartment displays are equipped with a digital display, a capacitive touch ting industrial companies with considerable challenges. Intralogistics in particular button with a bright multi-coloured LED, and optionally an external sensor input. is looking for solutions that increase productivity and optimize the interaction and The production information system indicates the storage location that the picker communication between all work areas. From the delivery of raw materials to final should go to through coloured illuminated LEDs. The display also shows how many assembly, all components have to reach their place of deployment more quickly, parts are to be removed. The touch button or external sensor are used to confirm more efficiently and more reliably. Our Pick-to-Light and Put-to-Light solutions that a picking step has been completed. provide valuable support for picking and assembly applications. Using light signals, they guide employees through a sequence of work steps within a picking process Put-to-Light solutions are deployed in the filling area for empty containers. that have to be confirmed successively. This approach minimizes potential sources The functionalities are analogous to those of the Pick-to-Light solution.
    [Show full text]
  • FY12 Performance Oversight Hearing District Department of Transportation (DDOT)
    FY12 Performance Oversight Hearing District Department of Transportation (DDOT) Testimony of Terry Bellamy, Director District Department of Transportation Vincent C. Gray Mayor Committee on the Environment, Public Works and Transportation Councilmember Mary M. Cheh, Chairperson Friday, March 2, 2012 11:00AM Room 500 FY12 Performance Oversight Hearing District Department of Transportation (DDOT) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Organization and Operations ....................................................................................... 4 1.1. Organizational Chart ..................................................................................................................... 5 1.2. New Program(s) .......................................................................................................................... 18 1.3. Position Listing ............................................................................................................................ 26 1.4. Performance Evaluation(s) .......................................................................................................... 26 1.5. Detailed Employee(s) .................................................................................................................. 27 1.6. Inventory of Personal Assets and Compensation ....................................................................... 27 1.7. Electronic Databases ................................................................................................................... 28 1.8. Transparency ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2014-2015 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Performance Oversight Questions
    2014-2015 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Performance Oversight Questions Agency Organization 1. Please provide a complete, up-to-date organizational chart for each division within WMATA including, either attached or separately, an explanation of the roles and responsibilities for each division and subdivision. Answer: Please access the following link: http://wmata.com/pdfs/Org_Chart_1-14-15.pdf Human Resources 2. Please provide a complete, up-to-date position listing for WMATA in Excel spreadsheet format, which includes the following information: Title of position Name of employee or statement that the position is vacant, unfunded, or proposed For each vacant position, how long has it been vacant and what is the status to fill the position Date employee began in position Salary and fringe benefits, including the specific grade, series, and step of position Job status (continuing/term/temporary/contract) Answer: See Attachment #2 3. What is the current vacancy rate and turnover rate? Answer: Current Vacancy rate = 6% Turnover Rate = 6.8% 4. What number and percent of your employees are District residents? What number and percent of new hires in FY’14 and FY’15 to date are District residents? Answer: DC Residents = 12.7% Fiscal Year DC Resident Total Hires % DC Residents CY 2014 1815 841 14% CY 2015 YTD 1641 12% 5. How many individuals have been interviewed and/or hired by WMATA as a result of the partnership with the DC Office of Employment Services (DOES) in FY’14, FY’15 to date, and total to date since the program’s inception? Has the nature of the partnership been reviewed or revisited to increase candidates? Answer: FY2013 = 5 FY2014 = 1 Total DOES hires since inception = 7 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit & Bus Committee Meeting
    Transit & Bus Committee Meeting July 2014 Committee Members F. Ferrer, Committee Chairman J. Banks III, Committee Vice Chairman J. Ballan S. Metzger J. Kay A. Albert C. Moerdler A. Cappelli J. Molloy E. Watt Transit & Bus Committee Meeting 347 Madison Ave. - 5th Floor Board Room New York, NY 10017 Monday, 7/28/2014 9:30 - 10:30 AM ET 1. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – JUNE 23, 2014 June Committee Meeting Minutes - Page 4 3. COMMITTEE WORK PLAN Committee Work Plan - Page 10 4. OPERATIONS PERFORMANCE SUMMARY a. May Operations Report May Operations Report - Page 18 5. FINANCIAL REPORTS a. May NYCT Financial & Ridership Report NYCT Financial Report - Page 55 b. May SIR Financial & Ridership Report SIR Financial Report - Page 77 c. May MTA Bus Financial & Ridership Report MTA Bus Financial Report - Page 88 d. Capital Program Status Report Capital Program Status Report - Page 101 6. PROCUREMENTS July Procurement Staff Summary & Resolution - Page 110 a. Non-Competitive NYCT Non-Competitive Actions - Page 114 b. Competitive NYCT Competitive Actions - Page 116 c. Ratifications NYCT Ratifications - Page 127 7. ACTION ITEMS Approve a. ADA Accessibility ADA Accessibility: 3 Stations -- Sea Beach & West End Lines - Page 131 8. SERVICE CHANGES a. NYCT Bx24 Extension Approve NYCT Bx24 Extension - Page 133 b. NYCT Q17/27 Route Revision NYCT Q17/27 Route Revision - Page 139 c. MTA Bus Q113 Local and Q114 Limited Restructuring MTA Bus Q113 Local and Q114 Limited Restructuring - Page 143 9. SPECIAL REPORTS & PRESENTATIONS a. MetroCard Report MetroCard Report - Page 148 10. STANDARD FOLLOW-UP REPORTS a. NYCT & MTA Bus EEO & Diversity Report NYCT & MTA Bus EEO & Diversity Report - Page 152 b.
    [Show full text]
  • School Bus Services in Rochdale September 2019 to July 2020
    School Bus Services in Rochdale September 2019 to July 2020 Services in this leaflet operate on schooldays only, unless otherwise stated. Services are listed alphabetically under school names. Rochdale Schools 2019-2020 website - 1 - 18/10/19 An introduction to School buses and concessionary fares for students in Greater Manchester Passengers can pay a fare to the driver for each journey shown on this timetable. However, students will need to show an IGO pass to travel at the concessionary (reduced) fare. If students do not have an IGO pass, they will have to pay a higher fare. Most of the journeys shown in this timetable are funded by Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM). The majority of TfGM funded services charge a standard fare and also offer daily return tickets. In some cases, the return ticket can also be used for travel on other journeys which serve similar areas – even if it is provided by a different operator. On most services, students can also buy a weekly scholar’s ticket, which costs £7.40. These are ONLY valid on schooldays on school buses and are available from the bus driver on all services where they are applicable. To help the driver, please try to have the correct fare when buying your ticket. A summary of fares and ticketing information on all school services included in this timetable can be found at https://www.tfgm.com/tickets-and-passes/bus-school-bus-services There are also a small number of TfGM funded services where the operator sets the fares. You will need to check with the operator what fares are available.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2020 Transit Development Plan
    DC Circulator Transit Development Plan 2020 Update April 12, 2021 (Page intentionally left blank) DC Circulator 2020 TDP i April 2021 Transit Development Plan 2020 Update DRAFT Table of Contents 1.046T 46T Introduction46T ..............................................................46T .................................................... 1 46T 46T Purpose of the Transit Development Plan (TDP)46T ..............................................................46T ............ 1 46T 46T Transit Development Plan Process46T ..............................................................46T ................................. 3 2.046T 46T DC Circulator System Overview46T ..............................................................46T ....................... 4 46T 46T History46T ..............................................................46T ............................................................................. 4 46T 46T Organizational Structure46T 46T ............................................................................................................... 6 46T 46T Strategic Goals and Objectives46T ..............................................................46T ....................................... 6 46T 46T Levels of Service46T 46T ............................................................................................................................ 8 46T 46T Fare Structure46T ..............................................................46T ............................................................... 10 46T 46T Fleet
    [Show full text]