DOCSLIB.ORG

Transit & Bus Committee Meeting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Transit & Bus Committee Meeting July 2014 Committee Members F. Ferrer, Committee Chairman J. Banks III, Committee Vice Chairman J. Ballan S. Metzger J. Kay A. Albert C. Moerdler A. Cappelli J. Molloy E. Watt Transit & Bus Committee Meeting 347 Madison Ave. - 5th Floor Board Room New York, NY 10017 Monday, 7/28/2014 9:30 - 10:30 AM ET 1. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – JUNE 23, 2014 June Committee Meeting Minutes - Page 4 3. COMMITTEE WORK PLAN Committee Work Plan - Page 10 4. OPERATIONS PERFORMANCE SUMMARY a. May Operations Report May Operations Report - Page 18 5. FINANCIAL REPORTS a. May NYCT Financial & Ridership Report NYCT Financial Report - Page 55 b. May SIR Financial & Ridership Report SIR Financial Report - Page 77 c. May MTA Bus Financial & Ridership Report MTA Bus Financial Report - Page 88 d. Capital Program Status Report Capital Program Status Report - Page 101 6. PROCUREMENTS July Procurement Staff Summary & Resolution - Page 110 a. Non-Competitive NYCT Non-Competitive Actions - Page 114 b. Competitive NYCT Competitive Actions - Page 116 c. Ratifications NYCT Ratifications - Page 127 7. ACTION ITEMS Approve a. ADA Accessibility ADA Accessibility: 3 Stations -- Sea Beach & West End Lines - Page 131 8. SERVICE CHANGES a. NYCT Bx24 Extension Approve NYCT Bx24 Extension - Page 133 b. NYCT Q17/27 Route Revision NYCT Q17/27 Route Revision - Page 139 c. MTA Bus Q113 Local and Q114 Limited Restructuring MTA Bus Q113 Local and Q114 Limited Restructuring - Page 143 9. SPECIAL REPORTS & PRESENTATIONS a. MetroCard Report MetroCard Report - Page 148 10. STANDARD FOLLOW-UP REPORTS a. NYCT & MTA Bus EEO & Diversity Report NYCT & MTA Bus EEO & Diversity Report - Page 152 b. NYCT & MTA Bus EEO President's Report NYCT & MTA Bus EEO President's Report - Page 163 11. MTACC REPORT MTACC Report - Page 171 Date of next meeting: September 22, 2014 at 10:30 AM Minutes of Regular Meeting Committee on Operations of the MTA New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, Staten Island Rapid Transit Operating Authority, Capital Construction Company and Bus Company June 24, 2014 Meeting Held at: Metropolitan Transportation Authority 347 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10017 10:30 AM The following Members were present: Hon. Fernando Ferrer, Committee Chair Hon. John H. Banks III, Vice-Chair Hon. Andrew Albert Hon. Allen P. Cappelli Hon. Ira Greenberg Hon. Jeffrey Kay Hon. Susan G. Metzger Hon. Charles G. Moerdler Hon. John J. Molloy The following Members were absent: Hon. Robert C. Bickford Hon. Mark Page Hon. David A. Paterson Hon. Jonathan A. Ballan Hon. Mark Lebow Also present were: Carmen Bianco, President, New York City Transit Robert Bergen, Executive Vice President Joe Leader, Senior Vice President, Subways Vincent Coogan, Deputy Chief, NYPD Transit Bureau Cheryl Kennedy, Vice President, Office of System Safety William DeSantis, Chief Procurement Officer, Materiel Peter Cafiero, Chief, Operations Planning Fred Smith, Senior Vice President, CPM Darryl Irick, President, MTA Bus Michael Horodniceanu, President, MTA Capital Construction ________________________________________________________________________________ Master Page # 4 of 179 - Transit & Bus Committee Meeting 7/28/2014 I. Chairman Ferrer opened the meeting. II. Public Speakers Joe Ann Brown thanked the Committee for restoring B37 bus service, and asked that restoration of the B51 bus also be considered. Murray Bodin addressed the Committee on “change,” commenting positively on the MTA’s efforts to stay up to date, and noting with favor the appointment by Governor Cuomo of three new “forward thinking” Board Members. III. Minutes and Work Plan Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Committee approved the Minutes of the May 19, 2014 meeting of the MTA New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, Staten Island Rapid Transit Operating Authority, Capital Construction Company and Bus Company. There were no changes to the Work Plan. IV. Agenda Items A. Operations Report President Bianco updated the Committee on the status of the investigation into the cause of the May 2nd derailment of the Manhattan bound express train, informing Members that testing of the rail has confirmed that it met NYCT specifications and was not defective. He noted that the investigation into the cause of the derailment was ongoing, and that the Committee would be advised as further information became available. SVP Leader reported to the Committee on the Department of Subways’ operating performance, noting that, effective June 8th, additional service would be added to the line by reducing weekday headways from 3:00 pm to 9:00 pm, and that the line would be extended from Myrtle Avenue to Essex Street on weekends. He also informed the Committee that service would be added to the , , , , , , and lines in accordance with the service guidelines policy, noting that the increased frequency on the line was made possible by CBTC running-time improvements using Automatic Train Operation. SVP Leader reiterated NYCT’s commitment to understanding the dynamics of service delays and instituting programs to help mitigate such delays going forward, and remarked on the fact that the MDBF for the rail car fleet has increased since January of 2014 as a result of initiatives to address component reliability. SVP Leader also announced the appointment of Joseph Bromfield as Vice President and Chief Mechanical Officer for Car Equipment, informing Members that he will be responsible for continuing these initiatives. President Bianco expressed his concern regarding the increase in delays reflected in the operating reports, emphasizing his commitment to maintaining “evenly spaced” subway service headways and exploring means to improve performance. ________________________________________________________________________________ Master Page # 5 of 179 - Transit & Bus Committee Meeting 7/28/2014 In response to a question from Member Albert, SVP Leader assured the Committee that the focus on wait assessment would not be at the expense of system delays overall. Member Greenberg expressed his view that MDBF goals should be identified for each class of subway car, and that wait assessment goals for each subway line should be included in the Agenda. President Bianco noted that the 2014 wait assessment goal can be found in the Agenda. Member Moerdler commented on the utility of using KPI statistics to gauge overall performance, and inquired as to the perceived cause of the poor performance on four of the subway lines. Noting the commendable efforts being made to ensure good service, he questioned whether the right goals were being set, and whether schedules needed to be reworked. President Bianco noted that the running times of trains and patterns of ridership have changed, and reiterated the importance of considering all relevant factors in any analysis. In response to a question from Member Moerdler regarding platform doors, President Bianco noted that two initiatives, intrusion detection and platform door feasibility, are ongoing. Noting that wait assessment is a better means of evaluating performance, Member Kay asked whether consideration should be given to doing away with on-time performance as a relevant indicator. President Irick reported to the Committee on bus operating performance for both NYCT and MTA Bus, noting that the M60 Select Bus Service route, launched on May 25th between the Upper West Side of Manhattan and LaGuardia Airport, has dedicated bus lanes currently in effect 24 hours a day, seven days a week on 125th street between Lenox Avenue and Second Avenue. President Irick commented that reports from the Customer Ambassador Program, through which MTA staff assists customers with off board fare payment, indicate that riders appear to be adjusting quickly to the SBS service. He also remarked that all buses on 125th street are traveling somewhat faster, and that the upcoming summer pick will include adjustments to bus running times and revenue trips to further improve reliability. He advised the Committee that as bus time and ridership data become available, a report on the M60’s performance will be prepared by Operations Planning, as has been done on other SBS routes. In response to a question from Member Moerdler, President Irick explained that there is no direct correlation between bus accidents and the number of customer injuries. Vice President Kennedy presented the monthly Safety Report. In response to Member Moerdler’s concern regarding the role littering plays in causing track fires, Deputy Chief Coogan explained that the police issue summonses whenever such an infraction is observed. Chair Ferrer added that littering should be a specific focus of police activity. In response to a question from Member Cappelli, President Bianco noted that subway announcements are made regularly regarding the effect of littering on the incidence of track fires and delays in service. At Chair Ferrer’s request, Deputy Chief Coogan agreed to present a plan to address the littering problem at the next Committee meeting. Member Kay added that perhaps policy measures need to be taken to supplement enforcement efforts. ________________________________________________________________________________ Master Page # 6 of 179 - Transit & Bus Committee Meeting 7/28/2014 Deputy Chief Coogan presented the NYPD Transit Bureau statistics. In response to Member Moerdler’s suggestion that additional officers be directed to subway stations identified
Recommended publications
  • MTA Capital Program 2010-2014

    MTA Capital Program 2010-2014

    MTA Capital Program 2010-2014 As approved by the MTA CAPITAL PROGRAM REVIEW BOARD June 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 Investment Summary and Program Funding MTA CORE CPRB CAPITAL PROGRAM: 2010-2014 5 MTA NYC Transit Capital Program 7 Overview Program Plan MTA Long Island Rail Road Capital Program 27 Overview Program Plan MTA Metro-North Railroad Capital Program 43 Overview Program Plan MTA Bus Company Capital Program 59 Overview Program Plan MTA Security Capital Program 63 Overview Introduction MTA Interagency Capital Program 69 Overview Program Plan COMPLETING CURRENT EXPANSION PROJECTS: 2010-2014 75 MTA Capital Construction Company Capital Program 77 Overview Program plan MTA BRIDGES AND TUNNELS CAPITAL PROGRAM: 2010-2014 91 Overview Program Plan CAPITAL PROGRAM PROJECT LISTINGS: 2010-2014 105 Approved 2010-2014 Capital Program Metropolitan Transportation Authority (This page intentionally left blank.) Approved 2010-2014 Capital Program Metropolitan Transportation Authority The MTA 2010-2014 Capital Program Approved 2010-2014 Capital Program Metropolitan Transportation Authority (This page intentionally left blank.) Approved 2010-2014 Capital Program Metropolitan Transportation Authority THE MTA 2010-2014 CAPITAL PROGRAM INVESTMENT SUMMARY On September 29, 2009 the MTA Board approved a proposed $28.080 billion 2010-2014 Capital Program and submitted that plan to the MTA Capital Program Review Board (CPRB) in October 2009 requesting their approval of the $25.572 billion CPRB portion of that plan. On December 31, 2009, the CPRB vetoed that plan without prejudice to permit additional time to resolve issues related to fully funding the program. The MTA prepared a revised CPRB program totaling $23.812 billion.
  • March 18, 2019 and Reviewed the Policies on the Agenda and Recommends Them for Approval

    March 18, 2019 and Reviewed the Policies on the Agenda and Recommends Them for Approval

    806 The Board Meeting ofthe Voorhees Township Board of Education was held on Monday, March 18,2019 at 7:34 PM at the Administration Building, Bruce Karpf, Vice-President, presiding. The Voorhees Township Board ofEducation uses a Rolling Agenda concept. Items that are listedfor a vote on the public board agenda are sent to the Board ofEducation members weekly as information items. Each member has the ability to request topic to be discussed in Committee meetings as needed. 1. PUBLIC NOTICE Public notice ofthis meeting pursuant to the Open Public Meetings Act has been given by the Board Secretary in the following manner: 1. Posting written notice on the official bulletin board at the Voorhees Township Public Schools Administrative Building on March 4, 2019. 2. Sending written notice to the Courier Post on March 4, 2019. 3. Filing written notice with the Clerk of Voorhees Township on March 4, 2019. II. SALlJTE TO TIlE FLAG III. ROLLCALL Present Absent Barbara Dunleavy Rachel van Aken Dana Galiano Dr. Marissa Levy Richard Nelson John Schmus Monica Watson Bruce Karpf, Vice-President Dawn Wallace, President (Arrived at 7:37 PM) Dr. Barry J. Galasso, Interim Superintendent Helen G. Haley, Business Administrator/Board Secretary Howard Mendelson, Attorney IV. 1. Motion by Dr. Levy, seconded by Mrs. Schmus, to approve the minutes ofthe meeting of February 27, 2019. Motion carried, 7 ayes. VOORHEES TOWNSHIP MARCI-I 18, 2019 807 2. Motion by Mrs. Watson, seconded by Dr. Levy, to approve the minutes of the March 11,2019 meeting and the executive session meetings of: a.
  • Los Angeles - Glendale - Burbank Corridor Feasibility Study Final Report 21 October 2019

    Los Angeles - Glendale - Burbank Corridor Feasibility Study Final Report 21 October 2019

    Los Angeles - Glendale - Burbank Corridor Feasibility Study Final Report 21 October 2019 Prepared by: In association with: IBI Group Terry A Hayes Associates HDR Translink RSE Epic Land Solutions RSG Costin Public Outreach Group LOS ANGELES GLENDALE BURBANK CORRIDOR FEASIBILITY STUDY FINAL REPORT PREPARED FOR Metro Regional Rail One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA October 21, 2019 IN ASSOCIATION WITH: IBI Group HDR RSE RSG Terry A. Hayes Associates Translink Epic Land Solutions Costin Public Outreach Group Los Angeles-Glendale-Burbank Corridor Feasibility Study Final Report October 2019 This page intentionally left blank. Page ii Los Angeles-Glendale-Burbank Corridor Feasibility Study Final Report October 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................. 1 Project Purpose...................................................................................................................... 1 Background ............................................................................................................................ 1 Feasibility Study Objectives ................................................................................................... 2 Study Findings ....................................................................................................................... 5 Study Resolution ...................................................................................................................10 1. INTRODUCTION
  • TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Adopted April 8Th, 2014 by Ordinance No

    TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Adopted April 8Th, 2014 by Ordinance No

    CITY OF TROUTDALE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Adopted April 8th, 2014 by Ordinance no. 820 Prepared for: Prepared by: City of Troutdale Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 219 E Historic Columbia River Highway 610 SW Alder, Suite 700 Troutdale, Oregon 97060 Portland, Oregon 97205 503.665.5175 503.228.5230 www.kittelson.com Transportation System Plan Troutdale Transportation System Plan Troutdale, Oregon Prepared For: City of Troutdale 219 E Historic Columbia River Highway Troutdale, Oregon 97060 (503) 665-5175 Prepared By: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 610 SW Alder, Suite 700 Portland, OR 97205 (503) 228-5230 Project Manager: Matt Hughart, AICP Project Principal: Mark Vandehey, P.E. Project No. 12560.0 March 2014 Table of Contents Transportation System Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... 1-1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................................................................. 1-1 Goals and Policies ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1-2 Transportation Plans ................................................................................................................................................................ 1-3 Financing ...............................................................................................................................................................................
  • Demand-Responsive Transportation Systems

    Demand-Responsive Transportation Systems

    I ~ I CleGFi nolOiQ· U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA·TION OF THE SECRETARY I , ...~Sharing OFFICE AND URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION ~ :::0 :....­ c:, •r• C, STATE-OF-THE-ART I OVERVIEW ...c: AUGUST 1974 HE 5620 dcmand-,c,pon,iUc +P3 D45 Urnill~~[POO[I]UffiU~OO~ ~ - w•on J --- ~·~ - This document has been prepared by the Transportation Systems Center and is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Trans­ portation in the interest of information exchange. FOREWORD On March 16, 1972, the President sent a special message to Congress wherein he called "for a strong new effort to marshal! science and technology in the work of strengthening our economy and improving the quality of our life." In this message he stated that in the final analysis," the progress we seek requires a new partnership in science and technology-­ one which brings together the Federal Government, private enterprise, State and local governments, and our universities and research centers in a coordinated, cooperative effort to serve the national interest." As part of its ongoing commitment to this principle of technology-sharing, the U.S. Department of Transportation has initiated a series of publications based on research and development efforts sponsored by the Department. The series comprises technical reports, state-of-the-art documents, newsletters and bulletins, manuals and handbooks, bibliographies, and other special publications. All share a primary objective: to contri­ bute to a better base of knowledge and understanding throughout the transportation community, and, thereby, to an improvement in the basis for decision-making within the community. This title in the series presents an overview of demand responsive transportation, an innovative approach that may help fill the need for flexibility in public transportation.
  • July 2014 ERA Bulletin.Pub

    July 2014 ERA Bulletin.Pub

    The ERA BULLETIN - JULY, 2014 Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 57, No. 7 July, 2014 The Bulletin SECOND WORLD’S FAIR OPENED 50 YEARS AGO Published by the Electric The World’s Fair Anniversary Festival, R-33 9306-45 Railroaders’ Association, which was held at the site of both fairs on Incorporated, PO Box May 18, commemorated the 50th and 75th DATE NUMBER OF CARS IN SERVICE 3323, New York, New York 10163-3323. anniversaries of the 1939 and 1964 fairs. The September, 1963 23 celebration began at 1 PM at the Unisphere in Flushing Meadows-Corona Park featuring October, 1963 40 For general inquiries, 50-cent carousel rides and puppet shows. In contact us at bulletin@ erausa.org. ERA’s the evening, the festivities concluded with a R-36 9346-9523, 9558-9769 concert by the Queens Symphony Orchestra website is DATE NUMBER OF CARS IN SERVICE www.erausa.org. followed by fireworks. Before the 1964 fair opened, Flushing Line September, 1963 4 Editorial Staff: stations were painted various shades of blue Editor-in-Chief: October, 1963 52 Bernard Linder and silver with orange handrails and ten-car Tri-State News and platforms were extended to accommodate November, 1963 90 Commuter Rail Editor: eleven-car trains. To provide the increased December, 1963 128 Ronald Yee service, NYC Transit ordered 430 cars. This North American and World January, 1964 164 News Editor: fleet included 390 R-36 married pairs num- Alexander Ivanoff bered 9346-9523 and 9558-9769 and 40 R- February, 1964 218 Contributing Editor: 33 single units numbered 9306-45.

  • 723-14 M34 M34a Sbs M&S Layout 1

    Bus Timetable Effective as of August 31, 2014 M34/ M34A Via 34 St M34 – between Javits Convention Center and Eastside Ferry Terminal M34A – between Waterside Plaza and Port Authority Bus Terminal If you think your bus operator deserves an Apple Award – our special recognition for service, courtesy and professionalism – call 511 and give us the badge or bus number. ¯˘¿ Fares – MetroCard® is accepted for all MTA New York City trains (including Staten Island Railway - SIR), and, local, Limited-Stop and +SelectBusService buses (at MetroCard fare collection machines). Express buses only accept 7-Day Express Bus Plus MetroCard or Pay-Per-Ride MetroCard. All of our buses and +SelectBusService Coin Fare Collector machines accept exact fare in coins. Dollar bills, pennies, and half-dollar coins are not accepted. Free Transfers – Unlimited Ride MetroCard permits free transfers to all but our express buses (between subway and local bus, local bus and local bus etc.) Pay-Per-Ride MetroCard allows one free transfer of equal or lesser value if you complete your transfer within two hours of the time you pay your full fare with the same MetroCard. If you pay your local bus fare with coins, ask for a free electronic paper transfer to use on another local bus. Reduced-Fare Benefits – You are eligible for reduced-fare benefits if you are at least 65 years of age or have a qualifying disability. Benefits are available (except on peak-hour express buses) with proper identification, including Reduced-Fare MetroCard or Medicare card (Medicaid cards do not qualify). Children – The subway, SIR, local, Limited-Stop, and +SelectBusService buses permit up to three children, 44 inches tall and under to ride free when accompanied by an adult paying full fare.
  • Greater Productivity for Intralogistics Robust Industrial Pick-To-Light Solutions Let’S Connect

    Greater Productivity for Intralogistics Robust Industrial Pick-To-Light Solutions Let’S Connect

    Greater productivity for intralogistics Robust industrial Pick-to-Light solutions Let’s connect. Intralogistics Increase efficiency and avoid errors Pick-to-Light and Put-to-Light Precise picking and feeding for intralogistics Solutions at a glance The acceleration of production working processes, flexible adjustments to meet Pick-to-Light (P2L) solutions are installed in the picking or withdrawal area. fluctuations in demand and the growing need for customised products are presen- The compartment displays are equipped with a digital display, a capacitive touch ting industrial companies with considerable challenges. Intralogistics in particular button with a bright multi-coloured LED, and optionally an external sensor input. is looking for solutions that increase productivity and optimize the interaction and The production information system indicates the storage location that the picker communication between all work areas. From the delivery of raw materials to final should go to through coloured illuminated LEDs. The display also shows how many assembly, all components have to reach their place of deployment more quickly, parts are to be removed. The touch button or external sensor are used to confirm more efficiently and more reliably. Our Pick-to-Light and Put-to-Light solutions that a picking step has been completed. provide valuable support for picking and assembly applications. Using light signals, they guide employees through a sequence of work steps within a picking process Put-to-Light solutions are deployed in the filling area for empty containers. that have to be confirmed successively. This approach minimizes potential sources The functionalities are analogous to those of the Pick-to-Light solution.
  • School Bus Services in Rochdale September 2019 to July 2020

    School Bus Services in Rochdale September 2019 to July 2020

    School Bus Services in Rochdale September 2019 to July 2020 Services in this leaflet operate on schooldays only, unless otherwise stated. Services are listed alphabetically under school names. Rochdale Schools 2019-2020 website - 1 - 18/10/19 An introduction to School buses and concessionary fares for students in Greater Manchester Passengers can pay a fare to the driver for each journey shown on this timetable. However, students will need to show an IGO pass to travel at the concessionary (reduced) fare. If students do not have an IGO pass, they will have to pay a higher fare. Most of the journeys shown in this timetable are funded by Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM). The majority of TfGM funded services charge a standard fare and also offer daily return tickets. In some cases, the return ticket can also be used for travel on other journeys which serve similar areas – even if it is provided by a different operator. On most services, students can also buy a weekly scholar’s ticket, which costs £7.40. These are ONLY valid on schooldays on school buses and are available from the bus driver on all services where they are applicable. To help the driver, please try to have the correct fare when buying your ticket. A summary of fares and ticketing information on all school services included in this timetable can be found at https://www.tfgm.com/tickets-and-passes/bus-school-bus-services There are also a small number of TfGM funded services where the operator sets the fares. You will need to check with the operator what fares are available.
  • Transit Concepts Report for Miami-Dade County and Transit Alliance

    Transit Concepts Report for Miami-Dade County and Transit Alliance

    Transit Concepts Report For Miami-Dade County and Transit Alliance September 2019 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 Appendix A: Phase 1 Public Input ....................................................................... 42 What are the big questions? ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Appendix B: Detailed Concept Maps .................................................................. 47 Ridership and Coverage Goals are in Conflict .............................................................................................................. 4 Appendix C: Isochrones ....................................................................................... 53 Public Input in Phase 1 .................................................................................................................................................. 5 What are the Concepts? ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Municipal Trolleys: Redesign for More Useful Service? ................................................................................................ 7 What are the outcomes of each concept? .................................................................................................................... 8 What can you do? ........................................................................................................................................................
  • Ultrasonic Sensors Ultrasonic Sensors for Object Detection

    Ultrasonic Sensors Ultrasonic Sensors for Object Detection

    Ultrasonic Sensors Ultrasonic sensors for object detection Regardless of color and surface properties BUS ultrasonic sensors can be used universally and are perfect for distance measurement or position detection of granular materi- als, liquids and powders. They measure fill levels, heights and sag without making contact as well as count and monitor the presence of objects. They do this regardless of color and surface properties. Therefore transparent objects that generate strong reflections pose no problem for them. As precision all-rounders, ultrasonic sensors are particularly suited for critical situations. Dust, dirt and steam do not impair them. Broad detection range – high precision Their detection range extends from 20 mm to 8 m, meaning that even longer object distances can be handled without problem. Their high resolution and small blind zones ensure extreme precision. Integrated synchronization means that the sensors do not interfere with one another. Switching and analog variants BUS ultrasonic sensors differ form one another in their output signal. Each series is available as a switching or analog version, whereby all analog versions are available with voltage or current output (0…10 V or 4…20 mA). The BUS M30 includes variants with two switching outputs, one switching and one analog output or two switching outputs and one analog output so that one sensor can adopt the function of a second sensor. IO-Link BUS 18M sensors with push/pull output are equipped with an IO-Link interface that enables a change from SIO mode to IO-Link mode. 402 Ultrasonic Sensors Contents Media 404 Industries, application areas 405 Application areas, sensor selection 406 Modes 407 Sound cones 408 Cylinder Designs BUS M30 410 BUS M18, BUS W18 418 BUS M12 434 Block Designs BUS R06 428 BUS Q80 436 Accessories for Ultrasonic Sensors 438 Basic information and definitions can be found on page 952.
  • Residents Lose Power During Intense Tuesday Storm

    Residents Lose Power During Intense Tuesday Storm

    VolumeVol.Volume 66, No. 65,65, 80 No.No. 207207 MONDAY,MONDAY,THURSDAY, FEBRUARYFEBRUARY AUGUST 6,10,10, 2020 20202020 50¢ A tree fell across wires in Queens Village, knocking out power and upending a chunk of sidewalk. VolumeQUEENSQUEENS 65, No. 207 LIGHTSMONDAY, OUT FEBRUARY 10, 2020 Photo by Teresa Mettela 50¢ 57,000 QueensQueensQueens residents lose power Vol.Volume 66, No. 65, 80 No. 207 MONDAY,THURSDAY, FEBRUARY AUGUST 6,10, 2020 2020 50¢ VolumeVolumeVol.VolumeVolumeVol.VolumeVol. 66, 66,67, 65, No. No.65, 65,No.65,65, No. 80 80No. No.No.10No. 2072 207 207207 WEDNESDAYMONDAY,MONDAY,MONDAY,THURSDAY, FEBRUARY FEBRUARYFEBRUARY, SEPTEMBER AUGUST 10, 6,10,10, 20202020 8,20202020 2021 50¢50¢50¢ Vol.Volume 66, No. 65, 80 No. 207 MONDAY,THURSDAY, FEBRUARY AUGUST 6,10, 2020 2020 50¢ VolumeTODAY 65, No. 207 MONDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2020 AA tree tree fell fell across across wires wires in50¢ in TODAY A tree fell across wires in TODAY QueensQueensQueens Village, Village, Village, knocking knocking knocking Biden tours storm-ravaged Queensoutout power power street and and upending upending Aout tree apower chunkfell across and of sidewalk. upending wires in a chunka Photochunk byof Teresaofsidewalk. sidewalk. Mettela VolumeQUEENS 65, No. 207 LIGHTSMONDAY, OUT FEBRUARY 10, 2020 QueensPhoto Village, by Teresa knocking Mettela 50¢ VolumeVolumeQUEENSQUEENS 65, 65, No. No. 207 207 LIGHTSduring intenseMONDAY,MONDAY, OUT FEBRUARY FEBRUARY 10, 10, 2020 2020 Photo by Teresa Mettela 50¢50¢ QUEENSQUEENSQUEENS LIGHTS57,000 QueensQueens OUT out power and upending 57,000 QueensQueensQueensQueens a chunk of sidewalk. 57,000 QueensQueensQueensQueens Photo by Teresa Mettela VolumeAUGUSTQUEENSQUEENS 65, No.