School Bus Services in Rochdale September 2019 to July 2020
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Bus Franchising Scheme and Notice
Public Document BUS FRANCHISING SCHEME & NOTICE – 30 March 2021 This page is intentionally left blank Agenda Item 1 TRANSPORT ACT 2000 The Greater Manchester Franchising Scheme for Buses 2021 Made 30/03/2021 ARRANGEMENT OF THE SCHEME 1. CITATION AND COMMENCEMENT…………………………………………………………………………………1 2. INTERPRETATION………………………………………………………………………………………………….……...1 3. THE FRANCHISING SCHEME AREA AND SUB-AREAS………………………………………………….…..2 4. ENTRY INTO LOCAL SERVICE CONTRACTS……………………………………………………………………..2 5. SERVICES UNDER LOCAL SERVICE CONTRACTS………………………………………………….………….3 6. EXCEPTIONS FROM THE SCHEME……………………………………………………………………….………..3 7. SCHEME FACILITIES………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..3 8. PLAN FOR CONSULTING ON OPERATION OF THE SCHEME……………………………………………4 ANNEXES TO THE SCHEME………………………………………………………………………………………………………..5 ANNEX 1: SERVICES INCLUDED – ARTICLE 5…………………………………………………………………….………..5 ANNEX 2: SERVICES INCLUDED – ARTICLE 5.2.3………………………………………………………………………..11 ANNEX 3: EXCEPTED SERVICES – ARTICLE 6………………………………………………………………………………14 ANNEX 4: TEMPORARY EXCEPTIONS – ANNEX 3 PARAGRAPHS 1.2 AND 1.3……………………………..15 ANNEX 5: FRANCHISING SCHEME SUB-AREAS…………………………………………………………………………..18 Page 1 WHEREAS: A The Transport Act 2000 (as amended) ("2000 Act") makes provision for a franchising authority to make a franchising scheme covering the whole or any part of its area. The GMCA is a franchising authority as defined in the 2000 Act. B The GMCA gave notice of its intention to prepare an assessment of a proposed scheme in accordance with sections 123B and section 123C(4) of the 2000 Act on 30 June 2017. Having complied with the process as set out in the Act, the GMCA may determine to make the scheme in accordance with sections 123G and 123H of the 2000 Act. NOW, therefore, the Mayor on behalf of the GMCA, in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 123G and 123H of the 2000 Act, and of all other enabling powers, hereby MAKES THE FOLLOWING FRANCHISING SCHEME (the "Scheme"): 1. -
Secondary School Places 2021 and 2022
Report to Cabinet Date of Meeting 29th September 2020 Portfolio Cabinet Member for Children's Services Report Author Fay Davies Public/Private Document Public Appendix 1 - Private Secondary School Places 2021 and 2022 Executive Summary 1.1 Rochdale Council is awaiting delivery of two new mainstream Secondary schools that are being delivered by the Department for Education, DfE, through the Free school programme. The DfE will not guarantee when the schools will open until planning consent for the schools is guaranteed and until a date for practical completion is set. 1.2 Until that date the council must work to meet its statutory obligation to offer every child living in the borough a place in Secondary school. 1.3 The Schools Organisation and Development Team are working closely with the DfE to deliver the new schools as soon as possible but must also plan for the scenario where any new school places are delayed. This report details these plans. Recommendation 2.1 That Cabinet approve the release of funds from Basic Need capital funding to deliver additional places at Wardle Academy for 2021 and 2022 as detailed in appendix 1. 2.2 That Cabinet recognise that the delivery of our much needed Secondary schools through the central government Free school programme leaves the council dependent on timings and decisions by central government with regards to the delivery of those schools, and consequently puts at risk delivery of its statutory duty to offer a school place to every child living in the borough. 2.3 That Cabinet approve the release of funds from Basic Need capital funding to meet the need to deliver 120 additional places for September 2021 in existing borough Secondary schools, as detailed in appendix 1. -
March 18, 2019 and Reviewed the Policies on the Agenda and Recommends Them for Approval
806 The Board Meeting ofthe Voorhees Township Board of Education was held on Monday, March 18,2019 at 7:34 PM at the Administration Building, Bruce Karpf, Vice-President, presiding. The Voorhees Township Board ofEducation uses a Rolling Agenda concept. Items that are listedfor a vote on the public board agenda are sent to the Board ofEducation members weekly as information items. Each member has the ability to request topic to be discussed in Committee meetings as needed. 1. PUBLIC NOTICE Public notice ofthis meeting pursuant to the Open Public Meetings Act has been given by the Board Secretary in the following manner: 1. Posting written notice on the official bulletin board at the Voorhees Township Public Schools Administrative Building on March 4, 2019. 2. Sending written notice to the Courier Post on March 4, 2019. 3. Filing written notice with the Clerk of Voorhees Township on March 4, 2019. II. SALlJTE TO TIlE FLAG III. ROLLCALL Present Absent Barbara Dunleavy Rachel van Aken Dana Galiano Dr. Marissa Levy Richard Nelson John Schmus Monica Watson Bruce Karpf, Vice-President Dawn Wallace, President (Arrived at 7:37 PM) Dr. Barry J. Galasso, Interim Superintendent Helen G. Haley, Business Administrator/Board Secretary Howard Mendelson, Attorney IV. 1. Motion by Dr. Levy, seconded by Mrs. Schmus, to approve the minutes ofthe meeting of February 27, 2019. Motion carried, 7 ayes. VOORHEES TOWNSHIP MARCI-I 18, 2019 807 2. Motion by Mrs. Watson, seconded by Dr. Levy, to approve the minutes of the March 11,2019 meeting and the executive session meetings of: a. -
The Rochdale Science and Technology Challenge Day for Gifted and Talented Year 8 and Year 9S
The Rochdale Science and Technology Challenge Day for Gifted and Talented Year 8 and Year 9s What are the Science & Technology Days for? How are they rated? They raise enthusiasm for STEM subjects and encour- Evaluations of last year’s events indicated that…. age young people to consider studying them further. 98% of the teachers and 87% of the young people con- In 2014, MCS Projects Ltd organised 40 Challenge Days sidered their Day to have been ‘good’ or ‘very good’. across the UK, involving more than 250 schools. 76% of the young people were more likely to consider What happens? studying STEM subjects at college or university as a result of the event. Twelve Gifted and Talented Year 8/9s are invited to participate from each school. Working together in mixed school teams of four, they undertake practical activities that increase their awareness of the applica- tion of science. Each activity is designed to develop skills that will be needed in the workplace, with marks being awarded for planning, team work and the finished product. Challenge Days are usually held on the campus of a local college or university. The young people undertake three 75min activities. The local Mayor or Deputy Lieu- The overall winning teams from each Challenge Day tenant is invited to present awards to members of each progress to one of our regional Finals In 2014, the Finals winning team. were hosted by the Universities of Cambridge, Man- chester and Sheffield. Director: P.W.Waterworth 12 Edward Terrace, Sun Lane, Alresford, Hampshire SO24 9LY Registered in England: No 4960377 • VAT Reg. -
Los Angeles - Glendale - Burbank Corridor Feasibility Study Final Report 21 October 2019
Los Angeles - Glendale - Burbank Corridor Feasibility Study Final Report 21 October 2019 Prepared by: In association with: IBI Group Terry A Hayes Associates HDR Translink RSE Epic Land Solutions RSG Costin Public Outreach Group LOS ANGELES GLENDALE BURBANK CORRIDOR FEASIBILITY STUDY FINAL REPORT PREPARED FOR Metro Regional Rail One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA October 21, 2019 IN ASSOCIATION WITH: IBI Group HDR RSE RSG Terry A. Hayes Associates Translink Epic Land Solutions Costin Public Outreach Group Los Angeles-Glendale-Burbank Corridor Feasibility Study Final Report October 2019 This page intentionally left blank. Page ii Los Angeles-Glendale-Burbank Corridor Feasibility Study Final Report October 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................. 1 Project Purpose...................................................................................................................... 1 Background ............................................................................................................................ 1 Feasibility Study Objectives ................................................................................................... 2 Study Findings ....................................................................................................................... 5 Study Resolution ...................................................................................................................10 1. INTRODUCTION -
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Adopted April 8Th, 2014 by Ordinance No
CITY OF TROUTDALE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Adopted April 8th, 2014 by Ordinance no. 820 Prepared for: Prepared by: City of Troutdale Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 219 E Historic Columbia River Highway 610 SW Alder, Suite 700 Troutdale, Oregon 97060 Portland, Oregon 97205 503.665.5175 503.228.5230 www.kittelson.com Transportation System Plan Troutdale Transportation System Plan Troutdale, Oregon Prepared For: City of Troutdale 219 E Historic Columbia River Highway Troutdale, Oregon 97060 (503) 665-5175 Prepared By: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 610 SW Alder, Suite 700 Portland, OR 97205 (503) 228-5230 Project Manager: Matt Hughart, AICP Project Principal: Mark Vandehey, P.E. Project No. 12560.0 March 2014 Table of Contents Transportation System Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... 1-1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................................................................. 1-1 Goals and Policies ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1-2 Transportation Plans ................................................................................................................................................................ 1-3 Financing ............................................................................................................................................................................... -
Rochdale Borough Council Community Secondary Schools
Determination Case reference: ADA3560 Objector: A parent Admission authority: Rochdale Borough Council for community secondary schools in Rochdale Date of decision: 27 June 2019 Determination In accordance with section 88H(4) of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998, I do not uphold the objection to the admission arrangements for September 2020 determined by Rochdale Borough Council for community secondary schools in Rochdale. The referral 1. Under section 88H(2) of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998 (the Act) an objection has been referred to the adjudicator by a parent (the objector) about the admission arrangements (the arrangements) for the community secondary schools in Rochdale for September 2020. The objection is that the priority given to children on the basis of the proximity of their homes to the nearest school is unfair to some pupils. 2. The parties to this objection are the objector and Rochdale Borough Council (the local authority). Jurisdiction 3. These arrangements were determined under section 88C of the Act on 25 February 2019 by the local authority, which is the admission authority for the schools. The objector submitted her objection to these determined arrangements on 2 May 2019. I am satisfied the objection has been properly referred to me in accordance with section 88H of the Act and it is within my jurisdiction. 4. Regulation 22 of The School Admissions (Admission Arrangements and Co- ordination of Admission Arrangements) (England) Regulations 2012 says “For the purposes of section 88H(5)(d), where the adjudicator has determined an objection to the admission arrangements of a school or Academy, no objection may be referred to the adjudicator raising the same or substantially the same issues in relation to those admission arrangements within 2 years of the decision by the adjudicator.” Determination REF3486 made by the adjudicator in December 2018 considered similar issues to those in this objection. -
Demand-Responsive Transportation Systems
I ~ I CleGFi nolOiQ· U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA·TION OF THE SECRETARY I , ...~Sharing OFFICE AND URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION ~ :::0 :.... c:, •r• C, STATE-OF-THE-ART I OVERVIEW ...c: AUGUST 1974 HE 5620 dcmand-,c,pon,iUc +P3 D45 Urnill~~[POO[I]UffiU~OO~ ~ - w•on J --- ~·~ - This document has been prepared by the Transportation Systems Center and is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Trans portation in the interest of information exchange. FOREWORD On March 16, 1972, the President sent a special message to Congress wherein he called "for a strong new effort to marshal! science and technology in the work of strengthening our economy and improving the quality of our life." In this message he stated that in the final analysis," the progress we seek requires a new partnership in science and technology- one which brings together the Federal Government, private enterprise, State and local governments, and our universities and research centers in a coordinated, cooperative effort to serve the national interest." As part of its ongoing commitment to this principle of technology-sharing, the U.S. Department of Transportation has initiated a series of publications based on research and development efforts sponsored by the Department. The series comprises technical reports, state-of-the-art documents, newsletters and bulletins, manuals and handbooks, bibliographies, and other special publications. All share a primary objective: to contri bute to a better base of knowledge and understanding throughout the transportation community, and, thereby, to an improvement in the basis for decision-making within the community. This title in the series presents an overview of demand responsive transportation, an innovative approach that may help fill the need for flexibility in public transportation. -
723-14 M34 M34a Sbs M&S Layout 1
Bus Timetable Effective as of August 31, 2014 M34/ M34A Via 34 St M34 – between Javits Convention Center and Eastside Ferry Terminal M34A – between Waterside Plaza and Port Authority Bus Terminal If you think your bus operator deserves an Apple Award – our special recognition for service, courtesy and professionalism – call 511 and give us the badge or bus number. ¯˘¿ Fares – MetroCard® is accepted for all MTA New York City trains (including Staten Island Railway - SIR), and, local, Limited-Stop and +SelectBusService buses (at MetroCard fare collection machines). Express buses only accept 7-Day Express Bus Plus MetroCard or Pay-Per-Ride MetroCard. All of our buses and +SelectBusService Coin Fare Collector machines accept exact fare in coins. Dollar bills, pennies, and half-dollar coins are not accepted. Free Transfers – Unlimited Ride MetroCard permits free transfers to all but our express buses (between subway and local bus, local bus and local bus etc.) Pay-Per-Ride MetroCard allows one free transfer of equal or lesser value if you complete your transfer within two hours of the time you pay your full fare with the same MetroCard. If you pay your local bus fare with coins, ask for a free electronic paper transfer to use on another local bus. Reduced-Fare Benefits – You are eligible for reduced-fare benefits if you are at least 65 years of age or have a qualifying disability. Benefits are available (except on peak-hour express buses) with proper identification, including Reduced-Fare MetroCard or Medicare card (Medicaid cards do not qualify). Children – The subway, SIR, local, Limited-Stop, and +SelectBusService buses permit up to three children, 44 inches tall and under to ride free when accompanied by an adult paying full fare. -
Greater Productivity for Intralogistics Robust Industrial Pick-To-Light Solutions Let’S Connect
Greater productivity for intralogistics Robust industrial Pick-to-Light solutions Let’s connect. Intralogistics Increase efficiency and avoid errors Pick-to-Light and Put-to-Light Precise picking and feeding for intralogistics Solutions at a glance The acceleration of production working processes, flexible adjustments to meet Pick-to-Light (P2L) solutions are installed in the picking or withdrawal area. fluctuations in demand and the growing need for customised products are presen- The compartment displays are equipped with a digital display, a capacitive touch ting industrial companies with considerable challenges. Intralogistics in particular button with a bright multi-coloured LED, and optionally an external sensor input. is looking for solutions that increase productivity and optimize the interaction and The production information system indicates the storage location that the picker communication between all work areas. From the delivery of raw materials to final should go to through coloured illuminated LEDs. The display also shows how many assembly, all components have to reach their place of deployment more quickly, parts are to be removed. The touch button or external sensor are used to confirm more efficiently and more reliably. Our Pick-to-Light and Put-to-Light solutions that a picking step has been completed. provide valuable support for picking and assembly applications. Using light signals, they guide employees through a sequence of work steps within a picking process Put-to-Light solutions are deployed in the filling area for empty containers. that have to be confirmed successively. This approach minimizes potential sources The functionalities are analogous to those of the Pick-to-Light solution. -
(Public Pack)Agenda Document for Middleton Township Committee, 12
Public Document Pack Meeting of: Middleton Township Committee Date: Thursday, 12th November, 2020 Time: 6.00 pm. Venue: Zoom Meeting This agenda gives notice of items to be considered in private as required by Regulations 5 (4) and (5) of The Local Authorities (Executive Arrangements) (Meetings and Access to Information) (England) Regulations 2012. Item AGENDA Page No No. 1 Apologies To receive any apologies for absence. 2 Declarations of Interest Members are required to declare any disclosable pecuniary, personal or personal and prejudicial interests they may have and the nature of those interests relating to items on this agenda and/or indicate if S106 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 applies to them. 3 Urgent Items of Business To determine whether there are any additional items of business which, by reason of special circumstances, the Chair decides should be considered at the meeting as a matter of urgency. 4 Items for Exclusion of Public and Press To determine any items on the agenda, if any, where the public are to be excluded from the meeting. 5 Minutes 3 - 5 To consider the Minutes of the meeting held on 17th September 2020. 6 Need for Primary School Places 2021 - 2024 6 - 21 Report of Director of Children’s Services regarding future primary school provision in the Borough – for information. 7 Secondary School Places 2021 and 2022 22 - 28 Report of Director of Children’s Services regarding the provision of secondary school places in the Borough in 2021 and 2022 – for information. Middleton Township Committee Members Councillor -
Secondary School Places 2021 and 2022
Report to Cabinet Date of Meeting 29th September 2020 Portfolio Cabinet Member for Children's Services Report Author Fay Davies Public/Private Document Public Appendix 1 - Private Secondary School Places 2021 and 2022 Executive Summary 1.1 Rochdale Council is awaiting delivery of two new mainstream Secondary schools that are being delivered by the Department for Education, DfE, through the Free school programme. The DfE will not guarantee when the schools will open until planning consent for the schools is guaranteed and until a date for practical completion is set. 1.2 Until that date the council must work to meet its statutory obligation to offer every child living in the borough a place in Secondary school. 1.3 The Schools Organisation and Development Team are working closely with the DfE to deliver the new schools as soon as possible but must also plan for the scenario where any new school places are delayed. This report details these plans. Recommendation 2.1 That Cabinet approve the release of funds from Basic Need capital funding to deliver additional places at Wardle Academy for 2021 and 2022 as detailed in appendix 1. 2.2 That Cabinet recognise that the delivery of our much needed Secondary schools through the central government Free school programme leaves the council dependent on timings and decisions by central government with regards to the delivery of those schools, and consequently puts at risk delivery of its statutory duty to offer a school place to every child living in the borough. 2.3 That Cabinet approve the release of funds from Basic Need capital funding to meet the need to deliver 120 additional places for September 2021 in existing borough Secondary schools, as detailed in appendix 1.