An Assessment of the Effect of X-Ray Radiation on DNA Marker Profiles Obtained from Human Teeth
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2013 An Assessment of the Effect of X-ray Radiation on DNA Marker Profiles Obtained from Human Teeth Erin Lynn Knapp [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Biological and Physical Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Knapp, Erin Lynn, "An Assessment of the Effect of X-ray Radiation on DNA Marker Profiles Obtained from Human Teeth. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2013. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2444 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Erin Lynn Knapp entitled "An Assessment of the Effect of X-ray Radiation on DNA Marker Profiles Obtained from Human Teeth." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Graciela Cabana, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Benjamin M. Auerbach, Lee M. Jantz Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) An Assessment of the Effect of X-ray Radiation on DNA Marker Profiles Obtained from Human Teeth A Thesis Presented for the Master of Arts Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Erin Lynn Knapp August 2013 ii Acknowledgements First, I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Graciela Cabana, for her support, ideas, and editing prowess. I also am thankful for the help and support from my committee members, Dr. Benjamin Auerbach and Dr. Lee Jantz. I would also like to thank everyone who attended the lab meetings at the Molecular Anthropology Lab over the last few semesters. You have all been great sounding boards. I also need to thank Dr. Michael Keene and my writing coach Ellen Rideout for helping me revise and revise again. I thank the Forensic Anthropology Center and the William M. Bass Endowment for the funding, materials, and ability to perform this thesis research. I thank Dr. Randall Pearce, DDS for providing the tooth samples to the University of Tennessee Department of Anthropology. I also thank the Molecular Anthropology Labs and Molecular Biology Resource Facility for allowing me the use of the facilities to process and analyze my samples. Many thanks to Joseph A. May and Veronica Brown for help analyzing my samples and learning how the fragment analyzer machine and software work. Thanks to Cathy Graves, R.T. at the UT Student Health Center for helping me X-ray my samples. Finally, thanks to my friends and family for encouraging me in every way to pursue my graduate education. iii Abstract X-ray radiation is known to destroy cells and damage DNA, yet human remains from forensic anthropology cases are routinely exposed to X-ray radiation as part of the documentation and evidence collection process. If X-ray radiation significantly impacts the quality of DNA extracted from human remains in forensic cases, then the validity of a resulting genetic profile is called into question. To better understand how X-ray radiation affects DNA profiles, specifically profiles consisting of short tandem repeat (STR) markers, this study followed standard forensic X-ray and genetic profiling protocols to obtain DNA profiles on individual molar teeth, before and after they were exposed to a single X-ray dosage event. The results of the study demonstrate that X-ray radiation did indeed affect DNA profiles, in two ways. First, the total number of DNA markers recovered pre-and post-X-ray radiation decreased significantly between the pre- (control) and post-(experimental) irradiation. Second, the overall amount of DNA per genetic marker recovered was significantly reduced, as measured by Relative Fluorescence Units (RFUs). Interestingly, contrary to expectations, the DNA markers recovered did not exhibit significant shortened fragments lengths post- irradiation, otherwise known as “allelic stutter.” Thus, it seems that X-ray exposure tended to damage DNA marker variants to such an extent that DNA markers were completely unrecoverable post- irradiation, rather than simply damaged to a point of producing allelic stutter. Importantly, X-ray radiation altered DNA marker profiles of individual cases before and after X-ray radiation. The post-radiation sample exhibited a significant amount of “allelic dropout,” leading to a condition known as “false homozygosity,” when one only DNA variant for a given locus is represented in a genetic profile instead of the two different variants that may actually be found in the sample. These results indicate further research is required to understand iv the stochastic effects of X-ray irradiation on DNA, and suggest that forensic samples undergo DNA analysis prior to exposure to X-ray radiation. v Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: Background ................................................................................................................... 7 DNA Structure............................................................................................................................. 8 Normal Degradation and Decay of DNA .................................................................................. 12 Short Tandem Repeats (STRs) .................................................................................................. 16 CODIS Markers ..................................................................................................................... 21 STR Genotyping: Relevant Issues............................................................................................. 23 PCR – Polymerase Chain Reaction ....................................................................................... 24 Allelic Stutter ......................................................................................................................... 25 Non-Template Addition ......................................................................................................... 29 Allele Dropout and Null Alleles ............................................................................................ 30 Microvariants and Off-Ladder Alleles .................................................................................. 31 Low Template DNA (LT DNA)................................................................................................ 32 Analytical Methods................................................................................................................ 34 X-rays ........................................................................................................................................ 37 DNA Damage from X-Ray ....................................................................................................... 38 Single Strand Breaks (SSBs) ................................................................................................. 39 Double Strand Breaks (DSBs) ............................................................................................... 40 Damaged Bases...................................................................................................................... 42 Forensic X-Ray Protocols ......................................................................................................... 43 Chapter 2: Research Questions, Study Design, and Methods ....................................................... 46 Research Questions ................................................................................................................... 46 Research Study Design.............................................................................................................. 47 Samples .................................................................................................................................. 47 Study Workflow .................................................................................................................... 48 Experimental Methods .............................................................................................................. 50 Contamination Controls ......................................................................................................... 51 Extraction Protocols .............................................................................................................. 53 PCR Set-Up and Amplification ............................................................................................. 55 DNA Visualization ................................................................................................................ 56 vi Experimental Sample Treatment: X-ray radiation................................................................. 57 Fragment Analysis ................................................................................................................. 58 Statistical Design & Methods ...................................................................................................