DOCSLIB.ORG

Free Speech and Civil Discourse

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF AMERICAN DEMOCRACY 2017 CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 27–28 CONFERENCE PROGRAM FREE SPEECH CIVIL DISCOURSE CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF AMERICAN DEMOCRACY 2017 CONFERENCE The 2017 biennial conference of the Center for the Study of American Democracy is focused on the issues relating to free speech and civil discourse. THE RIGHT TO FREE AND CANDID SPEECH represents a critical element of liberal education and democratic self-government. Yet American political discourse and academia are often characterized by incivility, disrespect, intolerance, even hate. As the conference title suggests, the imperatives of free society and polite society are some- times in considerable tension. These tensions in turn contribute to competing results: an impetus for restrictions on speech, a culture of political correctness, or desire for a safe space in which to express one’s opinions. Political freedom requires that individuals be able to speak openly about controversial subjects, differences of opinion, and the quality of government and those standing for public office. At the same time, sustaining free government may presuppose certain quali- ties in its people, including the capacity for political discourse characterized by deliberation and civility. Liberal education in turn rests upon an ability to engage in discourse with some respect for unpopular or different perspectives. Both education and democracy may produce discom- fort and impoliteness. The process of recognizing the limits of one’s own knowledge or of one’s political opinions may not be a pleasant experience. How to balance and address these tensions is one of many questions to be addressed in this wide-ranging two day conference held here in Gambier, Ohio. SCHEDULE OF EVENTS WEDNESDAY, APRIL 9 7:30 p.m. Opening Address: Inequality and America (Rosse Hall) WEDNESDAY,Douglas Holtz-EakinSEPTEMBER, former director 27 of the Congressional Budget Office; chief economic advisor to the McCain presidential campaign 4 P.M. CONFERENCE WELCOME Introduced by Sean Decatur, President of Kenyon College Tom Karako, director, Center for the Study of American Democracy (CSAD) THURSDAY,CANDOR, APRIL CRITICISM 10 AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF A FREE SOCIETY 9:15 a.m. EugenePanel: Volokh, Public UCLA Policy School and of LawInequality TeresaWilliam Bejan, Galston University, Brookings of Oxford Institution ShadiSuzy Hamid, Khimm Brookings, MSNBC Institution ModeratedRoss Eisenbrey by Nancy, Economic Powers, Policyassistant Institute director, CSAD Scott Winship, Manhattan Institute 5 P.M. PUBLICModerated RECEPTION by David Rowe, (Gund professor Gallery of Atrium) political science 7:3011:10 P.M. a.m. OPENINGInequality ADDRESS: of Opportunity FREE SPEECH (Rosse AND Hall) THE CONSTITUTION (Rosse Hall) JeffRobert Rosen, Putnam National, Harvard Constitution University Center IntroducedIntroduced by by Sean Max Decatur, Rappoport president ’14 of Kenyon College 1:15 p.m. Panel: Global Perspectives on Inequality THURSDAY,Branko SEPTEMBER Milanovic, City University 28 of New York Charles Horner, Hudson Institute 9:30 A.M. OPENBen White DISCOURSE ’94, Politico AND LIBERAL EDUCATION StanleyModerated Fish, by Yeshiva Jan Thomas, University associate provost and professor of sociology Allison Stanger, Middlebury College 2:40 p.m. Panel: Public Narratives about Inequality Moderated by Greg Lukianoff, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education Ross Douthat, New York Times 11:10 A.M. ISJim FREE Tankersley SPEECH, Washington THE ENEMY Post OF CIVIL SOCIETY? NadineLizzie Strossen,O’Leary, formerMarketplace president of the American Civil Liberties Union ModeratedModerated by by Paul Jay Corrigan,Singer ’88, professor USA Today of economics 1:304:00 P.M. p.m. HATEPublic SPEECH Reception AND THE(Gund LIMITS Gallery OF Atrium) FREE EXPRESSION 7:30 p.m. UlrichInequality Baer, New and York the University Market (Rosse Hall) StephanieAustan Goolsbee Fryberg ’94,, University University of ofChicago’s Washington Booth School of Business; former chair of Johneconomic McWhorter, advisers Columbia to President University Obama ModeratedIntroduced by by Melanie Eleanor Marlowe, Ritchie ’14 Carnegie Mellon University 3 P.M.FRIDAY, APRILIS THE ACADEMY11 TOO POLITICALLY CORRECT? 9:00 a.m. LauraCapitalism Kipnis, Northwestern and the Market University Derald Wing Sue, Columbia University Amity Shlaes, Calvin Coolidge Memorial Foundation Moderated by H. Abbie Erler, associate professor of political science John Tomasi, Brown University 4:30 P.M. PUBLICModerated RECEPTION by Sheryl Hemkin, (Gund associateGallery Atrium) professor of chemistry 7:1510:30 P.M. a.m. CIVILHealth DISCOURSE Care and AND Inequality AMERICA (Rosse Hall) HowardGreg Moody Dean,, formerDirector Governor of Health of Transformation,Vermont State of Ohio StevenIntroduced Pinker, by Harvard Devon Beeny University ’15 11:30 a.m. HeatherRising Mac Inequality: Donald, Manhattan Where doInstitute we go from here? ModeratedNeera Tanden by Tom, President, Karako, director,Center for CSAD American Progress IntroductionIntroduced byby JonJoe Klesner,Green ’14 provost of Kenyon College UnlessAll eventsotherwise are locatednoted, allin theevents Community will be held Foundation in the Gund Theater Gallery in CommunityGund Gallery Foundation unless otherwise Theater. noted. WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 27 CANDOR, CRITICISM AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF A FREE SOCIETY Moderated by Nancy Powers, assistant director, CSAD EUGENE VOLOKH Eugene Volokh teaches free speech law, tort law, religious freedom law, church-state relations law and a First Amendment amicus brief clinic at UCLA School of Law. Before joining UCLA, he clerked for Justice Sandra Day O’Connor on the U.S. Supreme Court and for Judge Alex Kozinski on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Volokh authored the textbooks The First Amendment and Related Statutes (6th ed. 2016) and Academic Legal Writing (5th ed. 2016). He founded The Volokh Conspiracy, a blog now hosted by the Washington Post that gets about 30,000 visits per weekday. TERESA BEJAN Teresa M. Bejan is an associate professor of political theory at the University of Oxford. Her research brings early modern English and American political thought to bear on contemporary questions. Her first book, Mere Civility: Disagreement and the Limits of Toleration (Harvard University Press, 2017) examines contemporary calls for civility in light of seventeenth-century debates about religious toleration. She has published articles in The Journal of Politics, History of Political Thought, Review of Politics and History of European Ideas. In 2015 she was elected as the final Balzan-Skinner Fellow in Modern Intellectual History at the University of Cambridge. SHADI HAMID Shadi Hamid is a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a contributing editor at the Atlantic. He is author of Islamic Exceptionalism: How the Struggle Over Islam is Reshaping the World and co-editor of Rethinking Political Islam. His first book, Temptations of Power: Islamists and Illiberal Democracy in a New Middle East, was named a Foreign Affairs Best Book of 2014. Hamid served as director of research at the Brookings Doha Center until January 2014. His articles have appeared in the New York Times, the Washington Post, Foreign Affairs, Foreign Policy and The National Interest. WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 27 OPENING ADDRESS: FREE SPEECH AND THE CONSTITUTION GEORGE L. OHRSTROM JR. LECTURESHIP ON DEMOCRACY With an introduction by Sean Decatur, president of Kenyon College JEFF ROSEN Jeff Rosen is the president and chief executive officer of the National Constitution Center, the only institution in America chartered by Congress to disseminate information about the United States Constitution on a nonpartisan basis. Rosen is also a professor at the George Washington University Law School and a contributing editor for the Atlantic. His essays and commentaries have appeared in the New York Times Magazine, the Atlantic, on National Public Radio and in The New Yorker, where he has been a staff writer. The Chicago Tribune named him one of the 10 best magazine journalists in America. He received the 2012 Golden Pen Award from the Legal Writing Institute for his “extraordinary contribution to the cause of better legal writing.” Rosen is the author of “Louis Brandeis: American Prophet,” “The Supreme Court: The Person- alities and Rivalries that Defined America,” “The Most Democratic Branch: How the Courts Serve America,” “The Naked Crowd: Reclaiming Security and Freedom in an Anxious Age” and “The Un- wanted Gaze: The Destruction of Privacy in America.” He is co-editor of “Constitution 3.0: Freedom and Technological Change.” THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 28 PANEL DISCUSSION: OPEN DISCOURSE AND LIBERAL EDUCATION Moderated by Greg Lukianoff, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education STANLEY FISH Stanley Fish is the Floersheimer Distinguished Visiting Professor of Law at Yeshiva University’s School of Law. He began his academic career at the University of California, then taught as the Kenan Professor of English and Humanities at Johns Hopkins University from 1974 to 1985. Fish was a professor of English and a professor of law at Duke and then served as dean of the College of Liberal Arts and Sci- ences at the University of Illinois from 1999 to 2004. Fish is a prolific author of more than 200 scholarly books and articles and contributes to The Opinionator blog for the New York Times. ALLISON STANGER Allison Stanger is the Russell Leng ’60 Professor of International Politics and Economics and found- ing director
Recommended publications
  • “Black Lives Matter” Movement Heather Mac Donald Author, the War on Cops

    “Black Lives Matter” Movement Heather Mac Donald Author, the War on Cops

    A PUBLICATION OF HILLSDALE COLLEGE ImpOVERr 3,400,000imi READERS MONTHLYs April 2016 • Volume 45, Number 4 The Danger of the “Black Lives Matter” Movement Heather Mac Donald Author, The War on Cops HEATHER MAC DONALD is the Thomas W. Smith Fellow at the Manhattan Institute and a contributing editor of City Journal. She earned a B.A. from Yale University, an M.A. in English from Cambridge University, and a J.D. from Stanford Law School. She writes for several newspapers and journals, including The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, The New Criterion, and Public Interest, and is the author of three books, including Are Cops Racist? and The War on Cops: How The New Attack on Law and Order Makes Everyone Less Safe (forthcoming June 2016). The following is adapted from a speech delivered on April 27, 2016, at Hillsdale College’s Allan P. Kirby, Jr. Center for Constitutional Studies and Citizenship in Washington, D.C., as part of the AWC Family Foundation Lecture Series. For almost two years, a protest movement known as “Black Lives Matter” has convulsed the nation. Triggered by the police shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, in August 2014, the Black Lives Matter movement holds that racist police officers are the greatest threat facing young black men today. This belief has triggered riots, “die-ins,” the murder and attempted murder of police officers, a campaign to eliminate traditional grand jury proceedings when police use lethal force, and a presi- dential task force on policing. Even though the U.S. Justice Department has resoundingly disproven the lie that a pacific Michael Brown was shot in cold blood while trying to surrender, Brown is still Imprimis_April16_8pg.indd 1 4/22/16 11:14 AM HILLSDALE COLLEGE: PURSUING TRUTH • DEFENDING LIBERTY SINCE 1844 APRIL 2016 • VOLUME 45, NUMBER 4 < hillsdale.edu venerated as a martyr.
  • Free Expression and Intellectual Diversity How Florida Universities Currently Measure Up

    Free Expression and Intellectual Diversity How Florida Universities Currently Measure Up

    POLICY BRIEF Free Expression and Intellectual Diversity How Florida Universities Currently Measure Up William Mattox Director of the J. Stanley Marshall Center for Educational Options iddlebury College. University of California, Berkeley. Evergreen State. MClaremont McKenna. Yale. The list of academic institutions rocked in recent months by (sometimes violent) speech-squelching protests is not pretty. And combined with growing concerns about high student debt and sagging job prospects for many new graduates, these efforts to thwart campus discourse are causing many people – for the first time ever – to question whether higher education is truly worth the investment it requires. www.jamesmadison.org | 1 For example, a 2017 survey by the Pew Research Center found campus craziness presents an opportunity for our state. For if the that 58 percent of Republicans and Republican-leaning indepen- Florida higher education system were to become a haven for free dents now believe colleges and universities are having a negative expression and viewpoint diversity – and to become known as effect on the direction of our country. This represents a whop- such – our universities would be very well positioned to meet the ping 21 percent shift since 2015 (when 37 percent of center-right growing demand for intellectually-serious academic study at an Americans viewed the performance of higher education institu- affordable cost. tions negatively).1 In fact, a major 2013 report said as much. Growing skepticism about the current direction of American In 2013, the American Council of Trustees and Alumni (ACTA) higher education isn’t just found among those on the center-right. produced a comprehensive report on the state of higher education For example, a center-left New York University professor named in Florida (with assistance from The James Madison Institute).
  • Amity Shlaes, Esteemed Scholar and Author, a 2021 Bradley Prize Winner Award Recognizes Extraordinary Talent, Dedication to American Exceptionalism

    Amity Shlaes, Esteemed Scholar and Author, a 2021 Bradley Prize Winner Award Recognizes Extraordinary Talent, Dedication to American Exceptionalism

    For Immediate Release Contact: Christine Czernejewski July 29, 2021 414-982-6684 Amity Shlaes, Esteemed Scholar and Author, a 2021 Bradley Prize Winner Award recognizes extraordinary talent, dedication to American exceptionalism Milwaukee, WI - The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation announced today that distinguished scholar and author Amity Shlaes is one of three winners of the 2021 Bradley Prizes. The honor recognizes individuals whose outstanding achievements reflect The Bradley Foundation’s mission to restore, strengthen and protect the principles and institutions of American exceptionalism. Shlaes will receive the award at the 17th annual Bradley Prizes ceremony on Monday, September 13th at the National Building Museum in Washington, D.C. “Amity’s exhaustive research and analysis of American economic history continues to inform influential decision makers,” said Rick Graber, President and CEO of The Bradley Foundation. “Her insight into how well-intentioned government programs have had the opposite effect of what they set out to achieve, provides valuable lessons for today. The Bradley Foundation is proud to honor Amity for her scholarship, which has contributed to important dialogue on economic policy.” Shlaes chairs the board of the Calvin Coolidge Presidential Foundation, the official foundation dedicated to preserving and promoting the legacy of America’s 30th president. The Coolidge Foundation is the sponsor of the popular Coolidge Scholarship, a full college scholarship for academic merit, and the Coolidge Senators program, which hosts 100 students each summer for a stay in Washington at Coolidge House to learn them about the values of President Coolidge. Shlaes’ most recent book is Great Society: A New History.
  • How the New Attack on Law and Order Makes Everyone Less Safe

    How the New Attack on Law and Order Makes Everyone Less Safe

    THE WAR ON COPS HOW THE NEW ATTACK ON LAW AND ORDER MAKES EVERYONE LESS SAFE “This is a book that can save lives.” —THOMAS SOWELL VIOLENT CRIME HAS BEEN RISING threat to young black males. On the contrary, it is SHARPLY IN MANY AMERICAN CITIES criminals and gangbangers who are responsible for AFTER TWO DECADES OF DECLINE. the high black homicide death rate. Homicides jumped nearly The War on Cops exposes the truth about officer use of 17 percent in 2015 in force and explodes the conceit of “mass incarceration.” the largest 50 cities, the A rigorous analysis of data shows that crime, not race, biggest one-year increase drives police actions and prison rates. since 1993. The reason is what Heather Mac Donald The growth of proactive policing in the 1990s, along first identified nationally with lengthened sentences for violent crime, saved as the “Ferguson effect”: thousands of minority lives. In fact, Mac Donald Since the 2014 police argues, no government agency is more dedicated to shooting death of Michael the proposition that “black lives matter” than today’s Brown in Ferguson, data-driven, accountable police department. Missouri, officers have been backing off of proactive policing, and criminals are becoming emboldened. Mac Donald gives voice to the many residents of high- crime neighborhoods who want proactive policing. This book collects and expands on Mac Donald’s She warns that race-based attacks on the criminal- groundbreaking and controversial reporting on the justice system, from the White House on down, are Ferguson effect and the criminal-justice system. It eroding the authority of law and putting lives at risk.
  • Jury Announced for the 27Th Annual Lionel Gelber Prize

    Jury Announced for the 27Th Annual Lionel Gelber Prize

    Jury Announced for the 27th Annual Lionel Gelber Prize For Immediate Release: January 3, 2017 (Toronto and Washington): Sara Charney, Chair of the Lionel Gelber Prize and President of The Lionel Gelber Foundation, and Stephen Toope, Director of the Munk School of Global Affairs, are pleased to announce an outstanding jury for the 2017 Prize, as follows: John Stackhouse, Jury Chair (Toronto, Canada) is joined by 2016 Lionel Gelber Prize Winner and journalist Scott Shane (Maryland, USA), Professor Allison Stanger (Vermont, USA), Dr. Astrid Tuminez (Singapore), and Professor Antje Wiener (Hamburg, Germany) to form the 2017 Jury. “Created in memory of the Canadian scholar, diplomat and author Lionel Gelber, we are gratified that the Prize attracts such distinguished jurors, year after year,” said Ms Charney, niece of the late Lionel Gelber. Key Dates: Five books will be named to the jury’s shortlist on January 31. Podcast interviews with each of the shortlisted authors in conversation with Professor Robert Steiner will be presented in partnership with Focus Asset Management. The winner will be announced on February 28 and invited to speak at a free public event at the Munk School of Global Affairs on March 29, 2017. About the Prize: The Lionel Gelber Prize, a literary award for the world’s best non-fiction book in English on foreign affairs that seeks to deepen public debate on significant international issues, was founded in 1989 by Canadian diplomat Lionel Gelber. A cash prize of $15,000 is awarded to the winner. The award is presented annually by The Lionel Gelber Foundation, in partnership with Foreign Policy magazine and the Munk School of Global Affairs.
  • Diversity Agenda Vs. Learning Class Warfare Taxes Threats to Free

    Diversity Agenda Vs. Learning Class Warfare Taxes Threats to Free

    Diversity Agenda Vs. Learning Class Warfare Taxes Threats to Free Speech Online What Will It Take to Control Spending? SPRING 2019 Freedom Is for Everyone N THIS ISSUE, YOU WILL FIND oppressors to the oppressed (primarily racial Heather Mac Donald (p. 16) discussing “the and sexual minorities) is the only just purpose I trashing of Western civilization” on college of politics, and if individual rights get in the campuses. Picking up that theme, Mike Gon- way of that project, then they must be shoved zalez (p. 32) identifies the entitlement state aside. Likewise, GDP growth, debt, deficits, and as a major motivator of those same corrupt- other traditional metrics of good policy matter ing agendas. not when weighed against the imperatives of A few pages away you can find Dan Mitchell equality of condition. (p. 26) employing the concept of deadweight loss In the conservative understanding, the to explain why everybody loses when tax rates preservation of individual liberty is the only are high, and Jonathan Bydlak (p. 21) making the legitimate purpose of government, and limiting case that controlling federal spending requires political power via a constitution of checks and budget process reforms. balances and rights is the means by which liberty Something for everybody—or at least is preserved. everybody who likes bad news. Read in While the conservative concern for conjunction, these articles lead to a dire constitutional rigor may seem distant from summation of our current situation: the everyday struggles of people, it at least has Raising taxes will harm the economy and lead this advantage over the progressive mania for to even more government spending (and deficits equality: It does not create insoluble conflicts and debt); but government spending is already over who is more oppressed than whom.
  • Is Racial Profiling a Legitimate Strategy in the Fight Against Violent Crime?

    Is Racial Profiling a Legitimate Strategy in the Fight Against Violent Crime?

    Philosophia https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-018-9945-1 Is Racial Profiling a Legitimate Strategy in the Fight against Violent Crime? Neven Sesardić1 Received: 21 August 2017 /Revised: 15 December 2017 /Accepted: 2 January 2018 # Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Racial profiling has come under intense public scrutiny especially since the rise of the Black Lives Matter movement. This article discusses two questions: (1) whether racial profiling is sometimes rational, and (2) whether it can be morally permissible. It is argued that under certain circumstances the affirmative answer to both questions is justified. Keywords Racial profiling . Discrimination . Police racism . Black lives matter. Bayes’s theorem . Base rate fallacy. Group differences 1 Introduction The Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement is driven by the belief that the police systematically discriminate against blacks. If such discrimination really occurs, is it necessarily morally unjustified? The question sounds like a provocation. For isn’t it obviously wrong to treat people differently just because they differ with respect to an inconsequential attribute like race or skin color? Indeed, racial profiling does go against Martin Luther King’s dream of a color-blind society where people Bwill not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.^ The key question, however, is whether this ideal is achievable in the real world, as it is today, with some persistent statistical differences between the groups. Figure 1 shows group differences in homicide rates over a 29-year period, according to the Department of Justice (DOJ 2011:3): As we see (the red rectangle), the black/white ratio of the frequency of homicide offenders in these two groups is 7.6 (i.e., 34.4/4.5).
  • Southern California Public Radio- FCC Quarterly Programming Report July 1- September 30,2016 KPCC-KUOR-KJAI-KVLA-K227BX-K210AD S

    Southern California Public Radio- FCC Quarterly Programming Report July 1- September 30,2016 KPCC-KUOR-KJAI-KVLA-K227BX-K210AD S

    Southern California Public Radio- FCC Quarterly Programming Report July 1- September 30,2016 KPCC-KUOR-KJAI-KVLA-K227BX-K210AD START TIME DURATION ISSUE TITLE AND NARRATIVE 7/1/2016 Take Two: Border Patrol: Yesterday, for the first time, the US Border patrol released the conclusions of that panel's investigations into four deadly shootings. Libby Denkmann spoke with LA Times national security correspondent, Brian Bennett, 9:07 9:00 Foreign News for more. Take Two: Social Media Accounts: A proposal floated by US Customs and Border Control would ask people to voluntarily tell border agents everything about their social media accounts and screen names. Russell Brandom reporter for The Verge, spoke 9:16 7:00 Foreign News to Libby Denkmann about it. Law & Order/Courts/Polic Take Two: Use of Force: One year ago, the LAPD began training officers to use de-escalation techniques. How are they working 9:23 8:00 e out? Maria Haberfeld, professor of police science at John Jay College of Criminal Justice spoke to A Martinez about it. Take Two: OC Refugee dinner: After 16 hours without food and water, one refugee family will break their Ramadan fast with mostly strangers. They are living in Orange County after years of going through the refugee process to enter the United States. 9:34 4:10 Orange County Nuran Alteir reports. Take Two: Road to Rio: A Martinez speaks with Desiree Linden, who will be running the women's marathon event for the US in 9:38 7:00 Sports this year's Olympics. Take Two: LA's best Hot dog: We here at Take Two were curious to know: what’s are our listeners' favorite LA hot dog? They tweeted and facebooked us with their most adored dogs, and Producers Francine Rios, Lori Galarreta and host Libby Denkmann 9:45 6:10 Arts And Culture hit the town for a Take Two taste test.
  • Building a Culture of Free Expression on the American College Campus

    Building a Culture of Free Expression on the American College Campus

    Building a Culture of Free Expression on the American College Campus CHALLENGES & SOLUTIONS by JOYCE LEE MALCOLM Perspectives on Higher Education American Council of Trustees and Alumni | Institute for Effective Governance™ The American Council of Trustees and Alumni (ACTA) is an independent, nonprofit organization committed to academic freedom, excellence, and accountability at America’s colleges and universities. Founded in 1995, ACTA is the only national organization dedicated to working with alumni, donors, trustees, and education leaders across the United States to support liberal arts education, uphold high academic standards, safeguard the free exchange of ideas on campus, and ensure that the next generation receives an intellectually rich, high-quality education at an affordable price. Our network consists of alumni and trustees from nearly 1,300 colleges and universities, including over 23,000 current board members. Our quarterly newsletter, Inside Academe, reaches more than 13,000 readers. ACTA’s Institute for Effective Governance™ (IEG), founded in 2003 by college and university trustees for trustees, is devoted to enhancing boards’ effectiveness and helping trustees fulfill their fiduciary responsibilities fully and effectively. IEG offers a range of services tailored to the specific needs of individual boards and focuses on academic quality, academic freedom, and accountability. Through its Perspectives on Higher Education essays, the Institute for Effective Governance™ seeks to stimulate discussion of key issues affecting America’s colleges and universities. Building a Culture of Free Expression on the American College Campus n n n CHALLENGES & SOLUTIONS by Joyce Lee Malcolm American Council of Trustees and Alumni Institute for Effective Governance™ April 2018 Building a CULTURE OF FREE EXPRESSION on the American College Campus About the Author Joyce Lee Malcolm is the Patrick Henry Professor of Constitutional Law and the Second Amendment at the Antonin Scalia Law School of George Mason University.
  • FIRE Calls on Virginia Tech to Abandon New Political Litmus Test

    FIRE Calls on Virginia Tech to Abandon New Political Litmus Test

    Spring 2009 Newsletter of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education Number 2 / Volume 7 In This Issue: FIRE Calls on Virginia Tech to Abandon 2 From the Board of Directors New Political Litmus Test for Faculty; 3 Michigan State Drops ‘Spamming’ Complaint Board of Visitors Agrees to Review Requirements Against Student Critic of Administration FIRE has called on Charles W. Steger, President of 4 Victory for Individual Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Rights at Pomona College to abandon proposed new guidelines for faculty assessment that would seriously violate 5 FIRE Cautions University faculty members’ academic freedom and their of North Carolina System constitutional right to freedom of conscience. Against Implementing Hate Speech Policy The proposal would force faculty members in Virginia 6 From the Campus Tech’s College of Liberal Arts and Human Sciences Charles W. Steger, President of Virginia Tech Freedom Network to adhere to an ideological loyalty oath to an entirely 8 FIRE Pens Open Letter abstract concept—“diversity”—that can represent In short, universities must not tell their professors what to President Obama vastly different things to different people. Faculty they must believe, or even what they should believe, lest are to be evaluated with “special attention” to the the whole process of intellectual inquiry and innovation 8 FIRE’s Adam Kissel candidate’s “involvement in diversity initiatives.” end before it even starts. By requiring candidates Wins Education Writers This includes “demonstrating accomplishments and for promotion and tenure to demonstrate an active Association Award significant contributions pertinent to the candidate’s involvement in “diversity initiatives,” Virginia Tech 9 Wright State University field” in areas such as “Publications,” “Courses impermissibly forces faculty members to confess both by Bans Christian Group taught,” “Competitive grants,” and other areas of word and by act their faith in the opinion that “diversity” from Campus professional contribution.
  • Download The

    Download The

    IN QUESTION The Lifeworth Annual Review of Corporate Responsibility in 2009 By Jem Bendell, with Ian Doyle, Jonathan Cohen, Emma Irwin LIFEWORTH 2010 and Nicky Black. 0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Capitalism in Question: The Lifeworth Annual Review of Corporate Responsibility in 2009. Jem Bendell thanks Ian Doyle for working with him throughout 2009 on a variety of projects and in particular the quarterly world reviews, Written by Jem Bendell, with Ian Doyle, Jonathan Cohen, and my other co-authors. Also to my father Emma Irwin and Nicky Black. Peter, for use of his house in Spain, and Olivier Hertzel and Benny at 'La Ferme Cheese' and Matthew Slater at CommunityForge, who helped provide a suitably cheap writing Copyright Jem Bendell. environment in Auroville, in India. Thanks to Malcolm McIntosh for supporting this final edition of the Lifeworth Annual Review, and Michael Powell for the previous support from Griffith University to bring it this far. Thanks also to Dean Bargh and John Stuart at Greenleaf Publishing who have worked with Published February 1st 2010 by Lifeworth, as a free pdf me on these reviews for almost a decade. download from http://www.lifeworth.com/consult Thank you to Lifeworth Associate Janna Greve for proof reading the Introduction, Roger Burke for further proofreading and to Hanniah Tariq for the beautiful layout and further editing. Ian Doyle thanks each of his co-authors for their meticulous attention to detail in their writing and their adaptability in working as a team. He also thanks Jem Bendell for his This annual review incorporates the quarterly world reviews guidance and practical insights when writing these articles, of the leading academic Journal of Corporate Citizenship, and his extra-ordinary ability to think systemically.
  • The Coolidge Brief

    The Coolidge Brief

    SUMMER 2015 The Coolidge Brief Charter Sponsors Herbert C. Hoover Creating Future Leaders through Debate at Plymouth Notch Harry S. Truman Dwight D. Eisenhower Summer is here and the presidential campaign John F. Kennedy Lyndon B. Johnson season is already heating up. Within months the first John Coolidge primary debates will take place, giving Americans a Jacqueline B. Kennedy glimpse at the candidates and their respective poli- Paul Mellon cy platforms. While the debates are indeed exciting, Honorary Advisors trying to work through and compare the details of Jimmy Carter Nancy Reagan the candidates’ various plans can be daunting. Officers Education about public policy works best when Amity Shlaes Chair started early. Thinking about tax reform or Social Robert A. Cerasoli Security for the first time during a presidential Vice Chair debate is far too late. Beginning in high school, or Catherine M. Nelson even earlier, Americans should be learning about Vice Chair Students debating property rights last Christopher C. Jeter policy and debating it amongst themselves. summer at the Notch. Treasurer Owen J. Stearns That is why we’ve made youth debate a center- Secretary piece of our work here at the Coolidge Foundation. This summer, for the third year in a row, the Matthew Denhart President Coolidge himself was a debater and un- Notch will welcome hundreds of high school de- Executive Director derstood the power of words, remarking in his own bate students from across America to participate Diane M. Kemble in our presidential debate program. Our partner is Education Director high school commencement oration that: “It would be hardly too much to say, that since the dawn of the Debate Institutes of Dartmouth and its leader Trustees Nicole Wanzer-Serrano.