DOCSLIB.ORG

AT Central Auckland Cycle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AT Central Auckland Cycle C1 Welcome Bike·Train·Ferry·Bus Get ready to ride Fifty-six thousand people started riding in Cycle Network Map Auckland Transport is creating streets for people, You don’t have to pedal the whole way. Auckland last year - get on your bike and join making it safe for those walking and travelling Cycling can be a great way to get you to the them. Central Auckland by bike to get around. As our cycling network City Centre • Mt Eden • Hillsborough • grows, you can join the thousands of people train, bus, or ferry. Lock up and climb on Cycle skills sessions Westhaven • Pt. Chevalier •Avondale taking to two wheels to explore and take regular board. If you are traveling by ferry or train you Auckland Transport wants to help you, your everyday trips by bike. can take your bike with you. Folding bikes are family and friends get riding. We provide permitted on buses. For more information on training courses at all levels for adults and kids. Courses include Learn to Ride for kids and bike bikes and public transport visit skills and maintenance for adults. AT.govt.nz See share smile Victoria Park When you’re riding on a shared path, take care for people walking or running. Keep to the left, #AKLBikeLife ring your bell and slow down when you pass. Follow us and share your bike adventures. Quick tips In New Zealand, you must wear a helmet and have a rear reflector on your bike. At night you’ll AucklandTransportCycling need a white front light and a red rear light so Auckland Transport others can see you easily. A bell lets people know when you are passing and a bike lock is a good idea too. Sign up for cycling email updates at AT.govt.nz/signup For more information go to Nelson St Cycleway AT.govt.nz/cycling Waterview Path How to use this map This map is one in a series of maps showing the Auckland Cycle Network. Expand your ride by joining up this map with others. Protected cycle lanes Shared paths Quiet routes On-road cycle lanes Whether riding locally with kids Protected cycle lanes are dedicated paths Shared paths are exactly that, paths shared by These are often quieter on road routes in These are on-road cycle lanes, often painted or heading into the city for work for people using bikes. They are physically people walking and cycling. Waterview Path, neighbourhoods that serve as great local with surface greening on part of the road or play you can use this map to choose the best path for you. It’s separated from people driving and people Northwestern Path, Lightpath and Grafton connections. Some will have lower speed that is dedicated for people using bikes. colour-coded to help you plan your walking, using various forms of separation Gully Path are examples. Shared paths are also limits and traffic calming to make the route Examples of these are found on Carrington ride and know what to expect. including planter boxes, concrete kerbs, found within local reserves or can be specially safe for all users. Wynyard Quarter’s 30km/hr Road, Dominion Road, and in Auckland Thicker lines are major cycleways. flex-posts, or berm space. Examples of marked footpaths. It is important to look out zone, shared spaces in the city like Fort Street Domain. Thinner lines are smaller local these are Quay Street, Nelson Street and St. for others, slow down, and pass with care. and O’Connell Street, Dominion Road Parallel routes or connections. Lukes Road. Routes and the Grey Lynn Greenway are What is the difference between examples of these. a shared path and a protected cycleway? Check out our mini design guide. Protected cycle lane Shared path Quiet routes On-road cycle lane Te Ara I Whiti - Lightpath Quay Street Cycleway Grafton Gully Path Grosvenor Street Carrington Road CITY - GELN INNES MAP C2 d R h ut e v o e t e d A t S v e S v d R i St A A v S t R n s s i n a A l k e r t re pit l d k o ve r t r e e k e e A s a d S a t C s a i r r r l i v R t n u r u a k S o r M e r u n G W l g t R t A t o S a l S a a n ur r i r t A r C E C fi a S o L u n r P t a l a s k h P l S C t a y h es k Rd Market a e M t h f S r a s n o t therine b c t Col. Ca i o n r S G e a o t a t t S w J t n e S l m B r S i Ja m rc S i r n i A l h k Tce View Harbour S t n a h t Hill St B r r a o e S T u c p y B S i l to R k i a t e a P r e r F S t T s h St r E e o d Hill St o r J Ave Ngaire t i M Cuthbert's St Mount Saint S Y G C sh A Mt x er o e John Domain d F h Ch Akaroa St Akaroa R t t o a r S D g an St way e n rm e nke ft I d o d c d n a R i Rd t R o r t B R S ro H T Dr d n l a d l l c uru St a St e ah r t a e M S s s d R s gi n u an r m a r N ha d d Davis Cr Davis d u u u a W Cr Belvedere St Belvedere R e k P o Q t t y h d R t n R r R e Alma St a d s t r D S he r p t St t Girls i S Clyde St v a d o a v us y l A e Nue g e c a r e T o a uad a e t n rg p y a M o n f g Q e w G t A v l r r S d u t a e m u F d Sch. for S Rd l m r d ne t oa M r l d r A a a r R O Museum l Diocesan l R u A o d Br R t o Be D r l Auckland ll S b u R g r d i s e Q t Mem. War a r t t n O C n t n e u H S r i n a e e e e s e e v S B b s e k T t i A d S Morgan St Morgan a r Park S n e nf t gh n t t i u R r e u o e g G o n g ho u r a r e a B r C a a p v t M u a y r m k d S ur v o C S Q n d M St nu A m R o a o o k a l e d R r r a l R M g A e re o r t a Y in ft o R K S D G d h b s r d C e t P t o o Alexandra C t n r am r G N r Lo l R T l u S w r o a r e R d o u h S b d Halifax Ave e c r g C F a as l C e r u y u k h k E b u C t n a c a d a h Green Ln West Ln Green u P l n y a a en p Newmarket R S a H u o r C M e a oo St Emerald d W t a Parnell o r e d n B M n n d i St S T E a r r m a e o R d R s Ln R T w u m a l m k u u e e y l l n f R i a e P M r a l lg Greenlane e v T e e o t Carlton Gore Rd L v l Morrow St d n T o A r h o a L Edgerley Ave n Kent St s l ne C f c R e Hay Pl Hay i o G i a d l l Normans Hill Rd Hill Normans Tooley St l C d i t a l s N G t r a S M d S R ar R r t i y ir S r b e e d T l Rd l l t e e p t s u R n Hi S e i G T o u r T l a s ns t o a e k e v S m r Clinical Centre M o a nu N b s o d a Silver Rd r d u M d o n e d o F h R o F i l R m P L g d h y Alpers Ave v s R S e r n c e a i e r a a ens A v v M T e R a D B t t A e A e nu ling Ave t w s S s v m v e d e p n d y Rd R McColl St McColl m u v t i o a eu ke s A r A n Epsom Girls' Rd Gladwin e k O R r A n u t m e a K e k n t Ave Gillies a n e a d e l r R S o v M Grammar Sch.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Diachronic Study of Unparliamentary Language in the New Zealand Parliament, 1890-1950
    WITHDRAW AND APOLOGISE: A DIACHRONIC STUDY OF UNPARLIAMENTARY LANGUAGE IN THE NEW ZEALAND PARLIAMENT, 1890-1950 BY RUTH GRAHAM A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Applied Linguistics Victoria University of Wellington 2016 ii “Parliament, after all, is not a Sunday school; it is a talking-shop; a place of debate”. (Barnard, 1943) iii Abstract This study presents a diachronic analysis of the language ruled to be unparliamentary in the New Zealand Parliament from 1890 to 1950. While unparliamentary language is sometimes referred to as ‘parliamentary insults’ (Ilie, 2001), this study has a wider definition: the language used in a legislative chamber is unparliamentary when it is ruled or signalled by the Speaker as out of order or likely to cause disorder. The user is required to articulate a statement of withdrawal and apology or risk further censure. The analysis uses the Communities of Practice theoretical framework, developed by Wenger (1998) and enhanced with linguistic impoliteness, as defined by Mills (2005) in order to contextualise the use of unparliamentary language within a highly regulated institutional setting. The study identifies and categorises the lexis of unparliamentary language, including a focus on examples that use New Zealand English or te reo Māori. Approximately 2600 examples of unparliamentary language, along with bibliographic, lexical, descriptive and contextual information, were entered into a custom designed relational database. The examples were categorised into three: ‘core concepts’, ‘personal reflections’ and the ‘political environment’, with a number of sub-categories. This revealed a previously unknown category of ‘situation dependent’ unparliamentary language and a creative use of ‘animal reflections’.
    [Show full text]
  • St Lukes Interchange (St Lukes Interchange) to Be Shown As Road Purposes for the Project (St Lukes Interchange)
    6 Henderson Valley Road, Henderson, Auckland 0612 Private Bag 92250, Auckland 1142, New Zealand Ph 09 355 3553 Fax 09 355 3550 Notice of Requirement NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR A DESIGNATION UNDER SECTION 168(2) OF THE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT 1991 (RMA) TO: Auckland Council FROM: Auckland Transport 6 Henderson Valley Road Henderson Private Bag 92250 Auckland AUCKLAND TRANSPORT (an Auckland Council Controlled Organisation) as Requiring Authority under section 167 of the Resource Management Act 1991 gives notice of a requirement for a designation in the Auckland Council District Plan for works being the Waterview Connection SH16 St Lukes Interchange (St Lukes Interchange) to be shown as road purposes for the Project (St Lukes Interchange). 1. SUMMARY The St Lukes Interchange will generally comprise: Auckland Transport gives notice of a requirement for an alteration to “Designations D05- 08 and B08-04” in the Auckland Council District Plan (Isthmus Section) 2011 (“District Plan”) to widen St Lukes Road and Great North Road at the St Lukes Interchange. The purpose of Designation D05-08 is for regional road and the purpose of designation B08-04 is for public road network. The designations are identified on District Plan Maps D05 and D06 and in Appendix B of the Planning Maps, copies of which are contained in Appendix A this NoR. Under Section 176A(2)(b) of the RMA it is not intended to submit an Outline Plan of Works prior to construction as the details of the proposed works, as referred to in Section 176A(3), are addressed in this NOR. The proposed works are in keeping with the purpose of designations D05-08 and B08-04.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Womens Competition
    2014 Women’s Provincial Championship FINAL as at 7 August 2014 All details are subject to change Home team listed first DATE KICK MATCH VENUE CITY OFF WEEK 1 Sat 23 Aug 2.10pm Counties Manukau v Auckland ECOLight Stadium Pukekohe Sat 23 Aug 2.30pm Bay of Plenty v Otago Ngongotaha RFC Rotorua Sat 23 Aug 1.30pm Hawke's Bay v Waikato Tremain Field Napier Sun 24 Aug 12.00pm Manawatu v Wellington * FMG Stadium Palmerston North BYE Canterbury WEEK 2 Sat 30 Aug 12.00pm Counties Manukau v Hawke's Bay * ECOLight Stadium Pukekohe Sat 30 Aug 12.30pm Canterbury v Bay of Plenty Rugby Park Christchurch Sat 30 Aug 1.00pm Waikato v Manawatu Fraser Tech Rugby Club Hamilton Sat 30 Aug 12.30pm Wellington v Otago Petone Recreation Ground Petone BYE Auckland WEEK 3 Sat 6 Sept 12.30pm Auckland v Wellington * Eden Park Auckland Sat 6 Sept 12.45pm Waikato v Bay of Plenty Fraser Tech Rugby Club Hamilton Sat 6 Sept 12.30pm Otago v Counties Manukau University Oval 1 Dunedin Sat 6 Sept 12:00pm Manawatu v Canterbury Arena Manawatu Field 3 Palmerston North BYE Hawkes Bay WEEK 4 Sat 13 Sept 12.00pm Bay of Plenty v Auckland * Rotorua International Stadium Rotorua Sat 13 Sept 11.00am Hawkes Bay v Otago Tareha Reserve Napier Sat 13 Sept 12.30pm Canterbury v Wellington Rugby Park Christchurch Sat 13 Sept 12:30pm Manawatu v Counties Manukau FMG Stadium Palmerston North BYE Waikato WEEK 5 Sat 20 Sept 2.30pm Hawkes Bay v Manawatu Tremain Field Napier Sat 20 Sept 12.30pm Wellington v Bay of Plenty Petone Recreation Ground Petone Sat 20 Sept 2.45pm Auckland v Waikato Western
    [Show full text]
  • 198 202 Dominion Road Interim Environment Court
    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 02-4- IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act BETWEEN PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND LIMITED (ENV-2018-AKL-000176) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent AND R Peters and R Bannan R Dexter and A Modrow N Smith P Lange L Whiley s 27 4 parties Court: Environment Judge M Harland Commissioner K Edmonds Commissioner D Bunting Hearing: 20-23, 26-27 August and 24-25 September 2019 Counsel: D J Minhinnick and S H Pilkington for the Appellant D Hartley, A Buchanan and B Ford for the Respondent Mr R Peters, Mr R Bannan, Mr R Dexter, Ms A Modrow, Mrs N Smith, Mr P Lange and Mr L Whiley- s 274 parties - for themselves Date of Decision: 6 March 2020 Date of Issue: - 9 MAR 2020 INTERIM RESERVED DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT 2 Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 5 Background .......................................................................................................................... 6 The initial proposal and the Independent Hearing Commissioners' decision ......................... 9 The proposal ....................................................................................................................... 1O The Evidence Design ...... ·................................................................................................ 11 The Closing Design ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bill Harry. "The Paul Mccartney Encyclopedia"The Beatles 1963-1970
    Bill Harry. "The Paul McCartney Encyclopedia"The Beatles 1963-1970 BILL HARRY. THE PAUL MCCARTNEY ENCYCLOPEDIA Tadpoles A single by the Bonzo Dog Doo-Dah Band, produced by Paul and issued in Britain on Friday 1 August 1969 on Liberty LBS 83257, with 'I'm The Urban Spaceman' on the flip. Take It Away (promotional film) The filming of the promotional video for 'Take It Away' took place at EMI's Elstree Studios in Boreham Wood and was directed by John MacKenzie. Six hundred members of the Wings Fun Club were invited along as a live audience to the filming, which took place on Wednesday 23 June 1982. The band comprised Paul on bass, Eric Stewart on lead, George Martin on electric piano, Ringo and Steve Gadd on drums, Linda on tambourine and the horn section from the Q Tips. In between the various takes of 'Take It Away' Paul and his band played several numbers to entertain the audience, including 'Lucille', 'Bo Diddley', 'Peggy Sue', 'Send Me Some Lovin", 'Twenty Flight Rock', 'Cut Across Shorty', 'Reeling And Rocking', 'Searching' and 'Hallelujah I Love Her So'. The promotional film made its debut on Top Of The Pops on Thursday 15 July 1982. Take It Away (single) A single by Paul which was issued in Britain on Parlophone 6056 on Monday 21 June 1982 where it reached No. 14 in the charts and in America on Columbia 18-02018 on Saturday 3 July 1982 where it reached No. 10 in the charts. 'I'll Give You A Ring' was on the flip.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Design Landscape and Visual Effect Assessment Report
    ABC194 Urban Design, Landscape and Visual Effects Assessment Prepared for Pudong Housing Development Ltd & Foodstuffs (NZ) Ltd FINAL 30 April 2021 Document Quality Assurance Bibliographic reference for citation: Boffa Miskell Limited 2021. ABC194: Urban Design, Landscape and Visual Effects Assessment. Report prepared by Boffa Miskell Limited for Pudong Housing Development Ltd & Foodstuffs (NZ) Ltd. Prepared by: Rachel de Lambert Partner Landscape Architect Boffa Miskell Limited Reviewed by: Ben Clark Associate Principal Urban Designer Boffa Miskell Limited Status: FINAL Revision / version: 6 Issue date: 30 April 2021 Use and Reliance This report has been prepared by Boffa Miskell Limited on the specific instructions of our Client. It is solely for our Client’s use for the purpose for which it is intended in accordance with the agreed scope of work. Boffa Miskell does not accept any liability or responsibility in relation to the use of this report contrary to the above, or to any person other than the Client. Any use or reliance by a third party is at that party's own risk. Where information has been supplied by the Client or obtained from other external sources, it has been assumed that it is accurate, without independent verification, unless otherwise indicated. No liability or responsibility is accepted by Boffa Miskell Limited for any errors or omissions to the extent that they arise from inaccurate information provided by the Client or any external source. Template revision: 20190517 0000 File ref: Document2 Template ref: Urban Design
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of John A. Lee's Expulsion Upon the Labour Party
    The Impact of John A. Lee's Expulsion upon the Labour Party IN MARCH 1940 the Labour Party expelled John A. Lee. Lee's dynamism and flair, the length and drama of the battle, not to mention Lee's skill as a publicist, have focussed considerable attention upon his expulsion. Almost all historians of New Zealand have mentioned it, and most have portrayed it as a defeat for extremism, radicalism, dissent or a policy of industrialization.1 According to one political scientist, although Labour did not quite blow out its metaphorical brains in expelling Lee, his expulsion heralded the victory of the administrators and consolidators.2 While few of those who have attributed a significance to Lee's expulsion have hazarded a guess at its effect .upon the Labour Party's membership or the party itself, Bruce Brown, who gave the better part of two chapters to the disputes associated with Lee's name, pointed out that 'hundreds of the most enthusiastic branch members' followed Lee 'out of the main stream of political life.'3 Brown recognized that such an exodus undoubtedly weakened the Labour Party although, largely because he ended his history in 1940, he made no attempt to estimate the exact numbers involved or the significance of their departure. This essay is designed to suggested tentative answers to both questions. Immediately after his expulsion Lee believed that radicals, socialists and even five or six members of parliament would join him. The first 1 For instance, W.H. Oliver, The Story of New Zealand, London, 1960, pp.198-99; W.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda of Manurewa Local Board
    I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Manurewa Local Board will be held on: Date: Thursday, 16 July 2020 Time: 6:00pm Meeting Room: Manurewa Local Board Office Venue: 7 Hill Road Manurewa Manurewa Local Board OPEN AGENDA MEMBERSHIP Chairperson Joseph Allan Deputy Chairperson Melissa Atama Members Anne Candy Tabetha Gorrie Rangi McLean Glenn Murphy Ken Penney Dave Pizzini (Quorum 4 members) Rohin Patel Democracy Advisor - Manurewa 13 July 2020 Contact Telephone: 021 914 618 Email: [email protected] Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz Note: The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted. Should Members require further information relating to any reports, please contact the relevant manager, Chairperson or Deputy Chairperson. Manurewa Local Board 16 July 2020 ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1 Welcome 5 2 Apologies 5 3 Declaration of Interest 5 4 Confirmation of Minutes 5 5 Leave of Absence 5 6 Acknowledgements 5 7 Petitions 5 8 Deputations 5 9 Public Forum 5 10 Extraordinary Business 6 11 Governing Body Members' Update 7 12 Members' Update 9 13 Chairperson's Update 13 14 Auckland Transport Report July 2020 15 15 Panuku and Auckland Transport integrated asset redevelopment programme 25 16 Statement of proposal to amend the Alcohol Control Bylaw 33 17 ATEED six- monthly report to the Manurewa Local Board 39 18 Manurewa Local Board Governance Forward Work Calendar - July 2020 47 19 Manurewa Local Board Workshop Records 51 20 Consideration of Extraordinary Items Page 3 Manurewa Local Board 16 July 2020 1 Welcome A board member will lead the meeting in prayer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mixed Member Proportional Representation System and Minority Representation
    The Mixed Member Proportional Representation System and Minority Representation: A Case Study of Women and Māori in New Zealand (1996-2011) by Tracy-Ann Johnson-Myers MSc. Government (University of the West Indies) 2008 B.A. History and Political Science (University of the West Indies) 2006 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Interdisciplinary Studies In the Graduate Academic Unit of the School of Graduate Studies Supervisor: Joanna Everitt, PhD, Dept. of History and Politics Examining Board: Emery Hyslop-Margison, PhD, Faculty of Education, Chair Paul Howe, PhD, Dept. of Political Science Lee Chalmers, PhD, Dept. of Sociology External Examiner: Karen Bird, PhD, Dept. of Political Science McMaster University This dissertation is accepted by the Dean of Graduate Studies THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK April, 2013 © Tracy-Ann Johnson-Myers, 2013 ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the relationship between women and Māori descriptive and substantive representation in New Zealand’s House of Representatives as a result of the Mixed Member Proportional electoral system. The Mixed Member Proportional electoral system was adopted in New Zealand in 1996 to change the homogenous nature of the New Zealand legislative assembly. As a proportional representation system, MMP ensures that voters’ preferences are proportionally reflected in the party composition of Parliament. Since 1996, women and Māori (and other minority and underrepresented groups) have been experiencing significant increases in their numbers in parliament. Despite these increases, there remains the question of whether or not representatives who ‘stand for’ these two groups due to shared characteristics will subsequently ‘act for’ them through their political behaviour and attitudes.
    [Show full text]
  • Still on the Road Venue Index 1956 – 2016
    STILL ON THE ROAD VENUE INDEX 1956 – 2016 STILL ON THE ROAD VENUE INDEX 1956-2016 2 Top Ten Concert Venues 1. Fox Warfield Theatre, San Francisco, California 28 2. The Beacon Theatre, New York City, New York 24 3. Madison Square Garden, New York City, New York 20 4. Nippon Budokan Hall, Tokyo, Japan 15 5. Hammersmith Odeon, London, England 14 Royal Albert Hall, London, England 14 Vorst Nationaal, Brussels, Belgium 14 6. Earls Court, London, England 12 Jones Beach Theater, Jones Beach State Park, Wantagh, New York 12 The Pantages Theater, Hollywood, Los Angeles, California 12 Wembley Arena, London, England 12 Top Ten Studios 1. Studio A, Columbia Recording Studios, New York City, New York 27 2. Studio A, Power Station, New York City, New York 26 3. Rundown Studios, Santa Monica, California 25 4. Columbia Music Row Studios, Nashville, Tennessee 16 5. Studio E, Columbia Recording Studios, New York City, New York 14 6. Cherokee Studio, Hollywood, Los Angeles, California 13 Columbia Studio A, Nashville, Tennessee 13 7. Witmark Studio, New York City, New York 12 8. Muscle Shoals Sound Studio, Sheffield, Alabama 11 Skyline Recording Studios, Topanga Park, California 11 The Studio, New Orleans, Louisiana 11 Number of different names in this index: 2222 10 February 2017 STILL ON THE ROAD VENUE INDEX 1956-2016 3 1st Bank Center, Broomfield, Colorado 2012 (2) 34490 34500 30th Street Studio, Columbia Recording Studios, New York City, New York 1964 (1) 00775 40-acre North Forty Field, Fort Worth Stockyards, Fort Worth, Texas 2005 (1) 27470 75th Street,
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Mixed Use Development 360 Dominion Road Mount Eden, Auckland Special Character Assessment Prepared for Pudong Housing Development Ltd & Foodstuffs (Nz) Ltd
    Plan.Heritage PROPOSED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT 360 DOMINION ROAD MOUNT EDEN, AUCKLAND SPECIAL CHARACTER ASSESSMENT PREPARED FOR PUDONG HOUSING DEVELOPMENT LTD & FOODSTUFFS (NZ) LTD MARCH 2021 Plan.Heritage Ltd. 48 Lake Road Narrow Neck Auckland 0624 [email protected] www.planheritage.co.nz Plan.Heritage Proposed Mixed Used Development 360 Dominion Road Mt Eden, Auckland Special Character Assessment Prepared for Pudong Housing Development Ltd & Foodstuffs (NZ) Ltd March 2021 CONTROLLED DOCUMENT Version Date Prepared by: Reviewed: Approved: FINAL for 02/03/2021 J Brown (MA E Key J Dalzell ISSUE MCIfA) Revision record Date Prepared by: Summary of Changes Approved Final Draft 01/03/2021 Minor corrections to text J Dalzelll Update references DRAFT 1 January 2020 J Brown (MA Reviewed by A Brown (MA E Key ACIfA) MSc) Reference this document: Brown. J, March 2021. Proposed Mixed Use Development; 360 Dominion Road Mt Eden, Auckland. Special Character Assessment. Prepared for Pudong Housing Development Ltd & Foodstuffs (NZ) Ltd. Cover image: Dominion Road and Valley Road intersection, Auckland (Plan.Heritage Ltd. 2020) Plan.Heritage Ltd. 48 Lake Road Narrow Neck Auckland 0624 [email protected] www.planheritage.co.nz 021 02973641 © Plan.Heritage Ltd. 2021. Reproduction of this document in whole or in part without permission is not authorised. 2 | P a g e Plan.Heritage Special Character Assessment: 360 Dominion Road Auckland March 2021 Plan.Heritage EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Pudong Housing Development Ltd & Foodstuffs (NZ) Ltd is proposing the construction of a mixed use development including retail, office space, and apartment blocks at 360 Dominion Road Mt Eden, Auckland.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Springs Speedway
    IN THE MATTER of Section 16 Resource Management Act 1991 A N D IN THE MATTER of the WESTERN SPRINGS SPEEDWAY ________________________________________________________________ REPORT OF INDEPENDENT COMMISSIONER HON PETER SALMON Q.C. ________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION 1. There has been a speedway at the Western Springs Stadium since 1929. Originally it was used for motor cycle racing. From about 1937 it began to be used for midget car racing. After a break during World War II, speedway racing has continued on a regular basis up to the present time. It seems that the intensity of the operation at the Stadium has varied over the years. 2. From time to time there have been complaints concerning the noise from speedway activities. At least since the early 1990s there have been regular complaints about noise but according to local residents, complaints to the Council in fact go back over decades. In December 1994 an Independent Hearings Commissioner heard submissions on the proposed Concept Plan for the Stadium and gave his decision in March of 1995. That decision, which became part of the Auckland City District Plan (Isthmus section) operative 1999, recommended certain noise limits and progressive reductions which have not been met and which it is claimed, cannot be met. 3. A group of residents incorporated themselves as the Springs Stadium Residents Association Inc. They made an application for an Enforcement Order to the Environment Court. In October 2005 the parties to that application, which included Springs Promotions Limited, the promoter of the speedway, and the Auckland City Council, participated in a mediation and reached agreement on various issues set out in a record of mediated agreements dated 5 October 2005.
    [Show full text]