Economic Contributions of Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining in Rwanda: Tin, Tantalum, and Tungsten

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Economic Contributions of Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining in Rwanda: Tin, Tantalum, and Tungsten Economic Contributions of Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining in Rwanda: Tin, Tantalum, and Tungsten January 2018 This document is an output from a project funded by the UK Department for International Development (DFID) through the Research for Evidence Division (RED) for the benefit of developing countries. However, the views expressed and information contained in it is not necessarily those of, or endorsed by DFID, which can accept no responsibility for such views or information or for any reliance placed on them. Contacts: Pact Global UK Ravenswood, Baileys Lane Westcombe, Somerset BA4 6EN UK +44 (0) 7584651984 [email protected] [email protected] Alliance for Responsible Mining – ARM Calle 32 B SUR # 44 A 61 Envigado – Colombia +57 (4) 332 47 11 [email protected] [email protected] Authorship: This report was prepared by Dr Maria Laura Barreto (team leader, legal aspects), Patrick Schein (economic aspects), Dr Jennifer Hinton (technical and social aspects), and Dr Felix Hruschka (context, mapping and compilation) as part of the EARF project ‘Understanding the Economic Contribution of Small-scale Mining in East Africa’ covering Kenya, Rwanda, and Uganda. The authors wish to acknowledge the important research assistance of Elizabeth Echavarria and Marina Ruete from ARM. Special thanks are extended to the project’s Expert Advisors Majala Mlagui (Kenya), Stephen Turyahikayo (Uganda), and Augustin Bida (Rwanda); Pact staff Jacqueline Ndirangu and Ildephonse Niyonsaba; Project Co-Managers Cristina Villegas of Pact and Géraud Brunel of ARM; the DFID EARF leadership who funded this study; and the in-country DFID representatives of Uganda, Kenya, and Rwanda, with whom the researchers met while conducting in-country assessments. About Pact and ARM: International not-for-profit organisations Pact and ARM are jointly responsible for this report’s contents. Both organisations are independent yet partner on a project by project basis to promote and achieve excellence in natural resource management, improve social and environmental responsibility within artisanal and small-scale mining, and assist communities to gain lasting benefit from the more sustainable use of the natural resources around them. The Economic Contributions of Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining in Rwanda: Tin, Tantalum, and Tungsten Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms .................................................................................................................i Executive Summary...............................................................................................................................iii Context iii Purpose and Methodology .......................................................................................................... iii Key Findings ............................................................................................................................... iv Recommendations ....................................................................................................................... v 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................1 1.1. Context 1 1.2. Purpose of the Study .............................................................................................................1 1.3. Methodology ..........................................................................................................................2 1.3.1. Limitations ............................................................................................................2 2. The ASM Context in Rwanda ............................................................................................................3 2.1. Country Overview ..................................................................................................................3 2.1.1. Political Context ..................................................................................................3 2.1.2. The Economy .....................................................................................................5 2.1.3. Human Development ..........................................................................................5 2.2. The Minerals Sector ..............................................................................................................6 2.2.1. Sector Overview .................................................................................................6 2.2.2. Political and Security Context of the Mining Sector ...........................................7 2.2.3. Mining Sector Stakeholders ...............................................................................9 2.2.4. ASM Policy and Legal Framework .................................................................. 10 3. Case Studies ................................................................................................................................... 13 3.1. Case Study: COMIKAGI Cassiterite-Tantalite Mines ......................................................... 14 3.1.1. Supply Chain Actors, Activities, and Employment .......................................... 14 3.1.2. Distribution of Economic Costs and Benefits across the Supply Chain .......... 16 3.1.3. Findings from the COMIKAGI Case Study ...................................................... 19 3.2. Case Study: Gifurwe Tungsten Mines ............................................................................... 20 3.2.1. Supply Chain Actors, Activities, and Employment .......................................... 21 3.2.2. Distribution of Economic Costs and Benefits across the Supply Chain .......... 22 3.2.3. Findings from the Gifurwe Case Study ........................................................... 24 4. Economic Contributions of 3T Mining ......................................................................................... 24 4.1. State Revenues .................................................................................................................. 25 4.1.1. Foreign Exchange and Export Earnings ......................................................... 25 4.1.2. Taxes and Royalties ........................................................................................ 25 4.1.3. Social Security Fund of Rwanda ..................................................................... 26 4.2. Local Economic Development ........................................................................................... 26 4.2.1. Formal and Informal Employment ................................................................... 26 4.2.2. Stimulus into Local Economies ....................................................................... 27 5. Conclusions and Recommendations ........................................................................................... 28 5.1. Conclusions ........................................................................................................................ 28 5.2. Recommendations ............................................................................................................. 30 5.2.1. Formalise Labour Relations and Balance Distribution of Benefits and Risk in the Supply Chain ................................................................................................... 30 5.2.2. Gender Inclusion Is Essential .......................................................................... 31 5.2.3. Training on OHS and Efficient Extraction and Processing is Needed ............ 31 5.2.4. The Permitting and Administrative Process Should be Improved ................... 33 Annex 1: References ........................................................................................................................... 34 A1.1. Relevant Laws and Regulations ........................................................................... 37 Annex 2: 3T Production by Districts .................................................................................................. 39 Annex 3: Stakeholder Analysis .......................................................................................................... 41 A3.1. Government .......................................................................................................... 41 A3.2. Private Sector Actors and Organisations .............................................................. 42 A3.3. International and Regional Implementing, Non-Governmental, and Civil Society Organisations ..................................................................................................................... 44 Annex 4: Specific Legal Aspects ....................................................................................................... 46 The Economic Contributions of Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining in Rwanda: Tin, Tantalum, and Tungsten A4.1. Legal and Technical Comments on Required Minimum Reserve Quantities for ASM 46 A4.2. Legal Comments on Apparent Incongruences of the Legal and Regulatory Framework for ASM ........................................................................................................... 47 Annex 5: Detailed Case Study on COMIKAGI Cassiterite-Tantalite Mines .................................... 50 A5.1. Area Overview ....................................................................................................... 50 A5.2. Supply Chain Actors, Activities, Employment, and Production ............................. 51 A5.3.
Recommended publications
  • Emergency Plan of Action (Epoa) Rwanda: Floods and Windstorm
    P a g e | 1 Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA) Rwanda: Floods and Windstorm DREF Operation n° MDRRW020 Glide n°: FL-2021-000049-RWA Date of issue: 14 May 2021 Expected timeframe: 3 months Expected end date: 31 August 2021 Category allocated to the of the disaster or crisis: Yellow DREF allocated: CHF 174,720 Total number of 6,500 people (1,300 Number of people to be 3,500 people (700 people affected: households) assisted: households) Provinces affected: Northern and Eastern Provinces/Regions Northern Province of Province of Rwanda (Gicumbi targeted: Rwanda (Gicumbi and and Burera in the North and Burera Districts and Eastern Kayonza District in the Province: Kayonza District Eastern Province Host National Society presence (n° of volunteers, staff, branches): 45 volunteers (6 NRTs, 9 BDRTs, 6 RRC staff (Head of Disaster Response, IT manager, PMER and 3 branch coordinators) Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners actively involved in the operation: Belgian Red Cross Flanders, French, Spanish, Austrian and Japanese Red Cross Societies and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies Other partner organizations actively involved in the operation: Ministry of Emergency (MINEMA), Local authorities and Faith based organisation A. Situation Analysis Description of the disaster More recently, from 28 April to 2nd May 2021, extensive flooding and mudslides were reported in Burera District due to waterflows and rocks from the volcanoes. The effects of rains and windstorm has also been observed in other districts including Gicumbi and Kayonza Districts as of 30 April 2021. This has led to extensive destruction of houses, crops, latrines death of livestock, destruction of the roads, and loss of households’ materials and even human death.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from Musanze District in Rwanda AUGUST 2020
    Urban-Rural Linkages in Times of Coronavirus Pandemic: Lessons from Musanze District in Rwanda AUGUST 2020 1 Copyright © 2020 Global Green Growth Institute Jeongdong Building 19F 21-15 Jeongdong-gil Jung-gu, Seoul 04518 Republic of Korea The Global Green Growth Institute does not make any warranty, either express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party’s use or the results of such use of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed of the information contained herein or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. The views and opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Global Green Growth Institute. Cover Image © Ilija Gubic Acknowledgements This report is written by Ilija Gubic and Andrew Kabera of Global Green Growth Institute. This report was reviewed by Daniel Ogbonnaya and Michelle DeFreese and edited by Michelle DeFreese and Pamela Birungi of Global Green Growth Institute. Illustrations for the report are drawn by Dario Babudri for Global Green Growth Institute while report is designed by Irene Isingizwe of Amasimbi Creative Ltd. 1. Introduction 5 Contents 2. Material and methods 6 3. Importance of urban-rural linkages 7 4. Results and Discussion 8 5. Case Study: Urban-Rural Linkages in 9 Musanze District . 6. Conclusions and Recommendations 21 7. References 21 4 1. Introduction Since December 2019, human life around the an infected person coughs or sneezes. COVID19’s world has been put into turmoil due to the global main difference with other coronaviruses is spread of Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19).
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Small-Scale Mining Operations on Economies and Livelihoods in Low- to Middle-Income Countries
    The Impact of Small-Scale Mining Operations on Economies and Livelihoods in Low- to Middle-Income Countries January 2018 This document is an output from a project funded by the UK Department for International Development (DFID) through the Research for Evidence Division (RED) for the benefit of developing countries. However, the views expressed and information contained in it is not necessarily those of, or endorsed by DFID, which can accept no responsibility for such views or information or for any reliance placed on them. Contacts: Pact Global UK Ravenswood, Baileys Lane Westcombe, Somerset BA4 6EN U.K. +44 (0) 7584651984 [email protected] [email protected] Alliance for Responsible Mining Calle 32 B SUR # 44 A 61 Envigado, Colombia +57 (4) 332 47 11 [email protected] [email protected] Authorship: This report was prepared by Dr Maria Laura Barreto (team leader, legal aspects), Patrick Schein (economic aspects), Dr Jennifer Hinton (technical and social aspects), and Dr Felix Hruschka (context, mapping and compilation) as part of the EARF project ‘Understanding the Economic Contribution of Small-scale Mining in East Africa’ covering Kenya, Rwanda, and Uganda. The authors wish to acknowledge the important research assistance of Elizabeth Echavarria and Marina Ruete from ARM. Special thanks are extended to the project’s Expert Advisors Majala Mlagui (Kenya), Stephen Turyahikayo (Uganda), and Augustin Bida (Rwanda); Pact staff Jacqueline Ndirangu and Ildephonse Niyonsaba; Project Co-Managers Cristina Villegas of Pact and Géraud Brunel of ARM; the DFID EARF leadership who funded this study; and the in-country DFID representatives of Uganda, Kenya, and Rwanda, with whom the researchers met while conducting in-country assessments.
    [Show full text]
  • RWANDA Poverty Assessment
    RWANDA Poverty Assessment April 2015 Public Disclosure Authorized Poverty Global Practice Africa Region Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized April 2015 1 ׀ RWANDA Poverty Assessment April 2015 ׀ RWANDA Poverty Assessment 2 RWANDA Poverty Assessment Poverty Global Practice Africa Region April 2015 3 ׀ RWANDA Poverty Assessment Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ................................................................................................10.... I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................... VIII11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................................12 IX 1. A Snapshot of Poverty in Rwanda ..........................................................................................................................12ix Rwanda‘s Poverty Profile: The Expected… ............................................................................................................13 x And the Rather Unexpected … .............................................................................................................................15 xii Inequality is high, driven by location, education, and occupation .......................................................................16 xiii Strong performance in health and basic education ................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda USADF Country Portfolio
    Rwanda USADF Country Portfolio Overview: Country program was established in 1986 and resumed U.S. African Development Foundation Partner Organization: in 2005 after a pause. USADF currently manages a portfolio of 24 Country Program Coordinator: Geoffrey Kayigi Africa Development Consultants projects and one Cooperative Agreement in Rwanda. PO Box 7210, CCOAIB Building, 3rd Floor Program Director: Rebecca Ruzibuka Total active commitment is $4.33 million. Agricultural investments Remera 1, Plot 2280, Umuganda Bld, Kigali Tel: +250.78.841.5194 total $3.66 million, off-grid energy investments total $348,778, and Tel: +250.78.830.3934 Email: [email protected] youth-led enterprise investments total $25,000. Email: [email protected] Country Strategy: The program focuses on smallholder farmer organizations across the country. Enterprise Duration Grant Size Description Coopérative des Agriculteurs de 2013-2017 $186,800 Sector: Agro-Processing (Maize) Maïs de Nyanza Town/City: Nyanza District, Southern Province (COAMANYA) Summary: The project funds will be used to construct a new factory and purchase approved equipment 2904-RWA and to expand marshland cultivation to another 130 hectares which will directly contribute to an increase of income for over 2,000 persons and promote food security in the area. Funds are also being used to roll out a pilot version of an innovative plot-mapping information system. Coopérative pour le 2015-2017 $78,700 Sector: Processing (Honey) Développement des Apiculteurs et Town/City: Nyamagabe District, Southern Province la Protection de l'Environnement Summary: The project funds will be used to supply beehives, harvesting equipment and to develop an (CODAPE) administrative and financial procedures manual and business plan, as well as to cover key staff 4113-RWA members’ salaries and basic administrative costs to enhance the cooperative’s capacity and boost its honey production and sales revenues.
    [Show full text]
  • Bugesera District Burera District Gakenke District Gasabo District
    Progress, but more effort Target achieved / on track Not on track N/A No data required Increase from last period Decrease from last period Proportion of Measles & Percentage of Proportion of Percentage of women Percentage of Rubella 2nd Delivery in Percentage of Newborn who new-born not Neonatal teenage receiving ANC 1 during ANC 4th mothers who dose (MR2) facility mother who received PNC 4 breathing service case delivery (19 postpartum 1st trimester standard visit Penta 3 received coverage, all coverage (w/ received PNC 4 Visit at 6 weeks successfully fatality years and Family coverage coverage BCG coverage coverage Iron+folic acid ages (BCG census-based Visit at 6 weeks after birth_new resuscitated rate_new under) planning (based on CBR) (based on CBR) (census-based) (census-based) during ANC denominator) target) 51.7 52.7 50.3 7.9 7.2 41.4 52 42.3 117 118.4 91.5 112.8 108 Bugesera District 76 75.3 84.3 5.3 8.3 71.6 51.7 40.5 84.8 87.4 96.7 121.2 69 Burera District 59.2 59.5 60.3 6.7 10.4 39.6 55.4 37.8 78.7 81.9 99.9 116.8 83 Gakenke District 24.4 24.5 70.7 4.4 3.3 28.3 52.8 35.7 123.2 117 59.6 87.7 124 Gasabo District 78.6 78 73.4 9.1 9.1 55 41.1 38 86.5 98.5 89.7 107.6 84 Gatsibo District 63.1 64.1 82 17.1 6.8 85.4 48.2 39.3 87.4 90.7 99 110.4 91 Gicumbi District 78.4 78.3 85.4 10.5 5.5 46.3 70.2 53.1 100.3 108.7 100 114.4 94 Gisagara District 61.6 63.2 68.2 15 4.4 64.5 50.8 36.1 91.5 89.8 100 101.1 95 Huye District 56 57.2 82.2 14.6 6.9 73.2 34.6 26.4 74.2 79.9 75.7 122.5 59 Kamonyi District 52.9 53 74.4 2.7 5.6 61.2 33.1 24
    [Show full text]
  • Kivuye in Burera District Final
    REPUBLIC OF RWANDA Ministry of Infrastructure ENERGY WATER AND SANITATION AUTHORITY (EWSA) Electricity Access Rollout Programme (EARP) Head Office: Avenue de l’ Ihema, P.O.Box 537, Kigali-Rwanda Tel: +(250)252573666 Fax: +(250)(0)252573802 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.ewsa.rw PROJECT BRIEF FOR THE INSTALLATION OF LOW VOLTAGE AND MEDIUM VOLTAGE LINES AND SERVICE CONNECTIONS IN BUNGWE – KIVUYE - GATEBE AREA IN BURERA DISTRICT December 2011 1 LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................ 5 0. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................. 6 I. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ................................................................................. 8 I.1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 8 I.2. OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT ............................................................................................... 8 I.3. PROJECT ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................................ 9 I.4. CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMME ..............................................................................................10 I.5. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................10 Description of Works ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Health Sector Performance Report FY 2019-2020
    Rwanda Health Sector Performance Report 2019-2020 TABLE OF CONTENT FOREWORD ....................................................................................................................................................... i TABLE OF CONTENT ......................................................................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES................................................................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................. viii LIST OF ACRONYMS .......................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 3 1. HEALTHCARE SERVICE DELIVERY .............................................................................................................. 3 1.1. Outpatient department (OPD) visits in health facilities ..................................................................... 3 1.2. Hospitalization .................................................................................................................................. 5 1.3. Access to clinical laboratory services ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rulindo District Full Life Cycle Wash Investment Plan
    Draft document Republic of Rwanda Rulindo District DRAFT RULINDO DISTRICT FULL LIFE CYCLE WASH INVESTMENT PLAN Supported by: 020 Draft document Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 4 2. Rulindo District Profile ............................................................................................................. 8 3. Rulindo WASH Level of Service ................................................................................................ 9 3.1. Progress of Water Services at the Household Level ............................................................ 9 3.2. Progress of Sanitation Services at the Household Level .................................................... 10 3.3. Progress of WASH Services in Public Institutions .............................................................. 11 4. The District- Wide Approach ................................................................................................. 12 5. District Full Life Cycle WASH Plan .......................................................................................... 14 5.1. Steps for Full Life Cycle Plan .............................................................................................. 14 5.2. Assessment of current services, assets and capacities...................................................... 15 5.3. Estimate the costs for full life cycle cost plan ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphic Processes Associated with Small-Scale Opencast Mining and Mitigation Measures
    Geomorphic Processes Associated with Small-Scale Opencast Mining and Mitigation Measures: Case Study of the Gatumba Mining District in the Western Highlands of Rwanda Thesis approved by the Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Process Engineering of the Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus–Senftenberg to gain the academic degree of Doctor of Natural Sciences (Dr. rer. nat.). by M.Sc. Rutazuyaza Vaillant Byizigiro Born on 21.03.1972, in Ilundu, DR-Congo (Ex-Zaïre) Reviewer: Prof. Dr. phil. Thomas Raab Chair of Geopedology and Landscape Development, BTU Cottbus-Senftenberg, Germany Reviewer: apl. Prof. Dr. habil. Dirk Freese Chair of Soil Protection and Recultivation, BTU Cottbus-Senftenberg, Germany Date of the oral examination: February, 10th 2016 Geomorphologische Prozesse in Zusammenhang mit kleinskaligem Tagebau und Mitigationsmaßnahmen: Fallstudie des Gatumba- Bergbaugebiets im westlichen Hochland von Ruanda Von der Fakultät für Umweltwissenschaften und Verfahrenstechnik der Brandenburgischen Technischen Universität Cottbus-Senftenberg zur Erlangung des Akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) genehmigte Dissertation. Vorgelegt von M.Sc. Rutazuyaza Vaillant Byizigiro Geboren am 21.03.1972, in Ilundu, Democratische Republic Kongo (Ex-Zaïre) Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Phil. Thomas Raab Lehrstuhl Geopedologie und Landschaftsentwicklung der BTU Cottbus-Senftenberg, Deutschland Gutachter: apl. Prof. Dr. Habil. Dirk Freese Lehrstuhl Bodenschutz und Rekultivierung der BTU Cottbus-Senftenberg, Deutschland Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 10 Februar 2016 Declaration I hereby declare that this doctoral dissertation is the result of my own research carried out at the Brandenburg University of Technology Cotttbus-Senftenberg, Germany, within the framework of the International Graduate Program in Land Use and Water Management. Professor Thomas Raab, Head Chair of Geopedology and Landscape Development of the Brandenburg University of Technology Cotttbus-Senftenberg, Germany have been the main Supervisor of this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Studies for Ttc Schools Option: Ealy Child Hood and Lower Primary Education (Eclpe) Year One
    SOCIAL STUDIES FOR TTC SCHOOLS OPTION: EALY CHILD HOOD AND LOWER PRIMARY EDUCATION (ECLPE) YEAR ONE STUDENT BOOK © 2020 Rwanda Education Board (REB). All rights reserved. This book is property of the Government of Rwanda. Credit must be given to REB when the content is quoted. FOREWORD The Rwanda Education Board is honoured to avail the Social Studies Student’s Book, Year One for Teacher Training Colleges (TTCs) in ECLPE Option and it serves as official guide to teaching and learning of Social Studies. The Rwandan education philosophy is to ensure that young people at every level of education achieve their full potential in terms of relevant knowledge, skills and appropriate attitudes that prepare them to be well integrated in society and exploit employment opportunities. The ambition to develop a knowledge-based society and the growth of regional and global competition in the job market has necessitated the shift to a competence-based curriculum. After a successful shift from knowledge to a competence-based curriculum in general education, TTC curriculum also was revised to align it to the CBC in general education to prepare teachers who are competent and confident to implement CBC in pre-primary and primary education. The rationale of the changes is to ensure that TTC leavers are qualified for job opportunities and further studies in higher education in different programs under education career advancement. I wish to sincerely express my appreciation to the people who contributed towards the development of this document, particularly, REB staff, lecturers, TTC Tutors, Teachers from general education and experts from Local and International Organizations for their technical support.
    [Show full text]
  • Gakenke District
    REPUBLIC OF RWANDA RWANDA TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (RTDA) FEEDER ROADS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (FRDP) REHABILITATION, UPGRADING AND MULTI-YEAR MAINTENANCE WORKS OF SELECTED FEEDER ROADS IN GAKENKE DISTRICT (LOT 1, 2&3 (69KM) UPDATED RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN GAKENKE DISTRICT April, 2020 Page 1 of 155 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Government of Rwanda (GoR) has received Additional Financing form Multi Donor Trust Funds (MDTF) for the Feeder Roads Development Project for rehabilitation of selected feeder roads in the six districts, namely Gatsibo, Nyagatare, Nyaruguru, Gakenke, Rutsiro and Nyabihu. In March 2017, the project prepared the Resettlement Action Plan for Feeder Roads rehabilitation in Gakenke district, however with the new contract approach of Design Build and Maintain (DBM) where contractor has to conduct detailed design, it was found necessary to update the initial RAP to take into consideration of the detailed design conducted by the contractors that have been hired in June and September 2019. This updated RAP identified new and old PAPs, their affected assets/properties, their value and provides a strategy for resettlement compensation to ensure that the PAPs’ livelihoods are restored or improved. The rehabilitation of the feeder roads requires the preparation of the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) to ensure that the planned activities are socially implemented in full compliance with Rwanda’s and the World Bank’s social policies and regulations. In this regards, RTDA/FRDP through Gakenke District employed JV CSC & EC, FAIR CONSTRUCTION and CHICO for updating the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) of the selected feeder roads of Gakenke, District. The present RAP report presents the main findings from Gakenke District.
    [Show full text]