DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Draft Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Draft Report ITAU AUDITORS LTD RWANDA ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY Evaluation of National Environment Youth Project(NEYP) Final Draft Report ITAU AUDITORS LTD Kigali, January 2013 1 CONTENTS CONTENTS................................................................................................................................... 2 LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ 5 LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 7 CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 9 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE EVALUATION .............................................................................................................. 9 1.2. KEY ISSUES ADDRESSED ......................................................................................................................... 9 1.3. METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................... 10 1.3.1. Secondary Data collection ................................................................................................................ 10 1.3.2. Primary Data collection ..................................................................................................................... 10 1.3.3. Group Discussions and Survey .......................................................................................................... 11 1.3.4 Sampling ............................................................................................................................................. 12 1.3.5 Survey Questionnaire ......................................................................................................................... 13 1.3.6 Data collection organizational ........................................................................................................... 13 1.3.7 Data Collection ................................................................................................................................... 14 1.3.8 Physical Measurement of Project Outputs ........................................................................................ 15 1.3.9 Data Processing .................................................................................................................................. 15 1.3.10 Data Validation and Tabulation ....................................................................................................... 16 1.3.11 Report Structure .............................................................................................................................. 16 CHAPTER TWO: THE PROJECT AND ITS DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT.................... 17 2.1. PROJECT START AND DURATION ......................................................................................................... 17 2.2. PROBLEMS THAT THE PROJECT SEEKS TO ADDRESS ............................................................................ 18 2.3. IMMEDIATE AND DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT ........................................................ 18 2.4. KEY STAKEHOLDERS ............................................................................................................................. 19 2.5 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PROJECT ............................................................................................................ 20 2.6. EXPECTED RESULTS .............................................................................................................................. 22 CHAPTER THREE: EVALUATION FINDINGS .................................................................. 23 3.1. ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF THE PROJECT ........................................................................................ 23 3.2. PROJECT SUPPORT TO THE LIVELIHOOD OF BENEFICIARIES ................................................................ 24 3.3. PROJECT PHYSICAL MEASUREMENTS BY DISTRICT .............................................................................. 28 3.3.1 MUSANZE District .............................................................................................................................. 28 3.3.2. GAKENKE District............................................................................................................................... 29 3.3.3. RULINDO District ............................................................................................................................... 30 3.3.4. GICUMBI Disrtict ............................................................................................................................... 30 3.3.5. HUYE District ..................................................................................................................................... 31 3.3.6. NYAMAGABE District ........................................................................................................................ 31 2 3.3.7. NYARUGURU District ......................................................................................................................... 32 3.3.8. GISAGARA District ............................................................................................................................. 32 3.3.9 NYANZA District ................................................................................................................................. 32 3.3.10. MUHANGA District .......................................................................................................................... 33 3.3.11. RUHANGO District ........................................................................................................................... 33 3.3.12. KAMONYI District ............................................................................................................................ 34 3.3.13. GASABO District .............................................................................................................................. 34 3.3.14. NYARUGENGE District ..................................................................................................................... 34 3.3.15. KICUKIRO District ............................................................................................................................ 35 3.3.16. BUGESERA Ditrict ............................................................................................................................ 35 3.3.17. Afforested Surface Area .................................................................................................................. 36 3.3.18. Protected Rivers .............................................................................................................................. 36 3.3.19. Protection of planted trees ............................................................................................................. 39 3.3.20. Project benefits and weaknesses .................................................................................................... 40 3.3.21 Protection of the river against water hyacinth ................................................................................ 42 3.4. REALIZED VS PLANNED ACTIVITIES BY DISTRICT .................................................................................. 42 3.4.1. NYARUGENGE ................................................................................................................................... 43 3.4.2. GASABO ............................................................................................................................................. 46 3.4.3. KICUKIRO ........................................................................................................................................... 49 3.4.4. KAMONYI........................................................................................................................................... 52 3.4.5. MUHANGA ........................................................................................................................................ 56 3.4.6. RUHANGO ......................................................................................................................................... 59 3.4.7. NYANZA ............................................................................................................................................. 63 3.4.8. HUYE.................................................................................................................................................. 66 3.4.9. GISAGARA.......................................................................................................................................... 69 3.4.10. NYARUGURU ................................................................................................................................... 72 3.4.11. NYAMAGABE ................................................................................................................................... 76 3.4.12. RULINDO ......................................................................................................................................... 79 3.4.13. GAKENKE ........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Republic of Rwanda Ministry of Education P.O.Box 622
    REPUBLIC OF RWANDA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION P.O.BOX 622 KIGALI Rwanda Report on Variable Tranche linked to two Indicators: 1.Equity Indicator: Pre-Primary Gross Enrolment Rate (GER) increased from an average of 10% in 2014 to 17% by 2017 in the 22 poorest performing districts (defined as those that had GER of less than 17% in 2014). $2.52million will be disbursed once the report demonstrating meeting the target is submitted in October 2017 2. Efficiency: Education Statistics 2016, disaggregated at district level, available. $2.52million will be disbursed once the report demonstrating meeting the target is submitted in October 2017 October 2017 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 SECTION 1: EQUITY INDICATOR: PRE-PRIMARY GROSS ENROLMENT RATE (GER) IN 22 POOREST PERFORMING DISTRICTS ............................................................ 3 Table 1. Pre-Primary Enrolment in 2016 and 2017 (All Distrcits) ................................. 3 Table 2. Pre-Primary Gross Enrolement Rate in Rwanda (as per GPE requirement) 5 Table 3. Pre-Primary GER in 2017 in 22 poorest performing districts current status 5 Table 4. Average of GER in Pre-Primary in 8 better performing districts in 2017 ...... 6 Table 5. GER in Pre-Primary Comparison between 2014 and 2017 in 22 Poorest Performing Districts ............................................................................................................ 7 Table 6. Classrooms Rehabilitated
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda LAND Report: Access to the Land Tenure Administration
    STUDY ON ACCESS TO THE LAND TENURE ADMINISTRATION SYSTEM IN RWANDA AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE SYSTEM ON ORDINARY CITIZENS FINAL REPORT July 2015` This report is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Written by: INES - Ruhengeri CONTACT INFORMATION: LAND Project Nyarutarama, Kigali Tel: +250 786 689 685 [email protected] STUDY ON ACCESS TO THE LAND TENURE ADMINISTRATION SYSTEM IN RWANDA AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE SYSTEM ON ORDINARY CITIZENS FINAL REPORT Subcontract No. AID=696-C-12-00002-INES-10 Chemonics International Recommended Citation: BIRARO, Mireille; KHAN, Selina; KONGUKA, George; NGABO, Valence; KANYIGINYA, Violet; TUMUSHERURE, Wilson and JOSSAM, Potel; 2015. Final Report of Study on the access to the land tenure administration system in Rwanda and the outcomes of the system on ordinary citizens. Kigali, Rwanda: USAID | LAND Project. September, 2015 The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................. 5 LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................ 7 LIST OF ACRONYMS .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RWANDA Poverty Assessment
    RWANDA Poverty Assessment April 2015 Public Disclosure Authorized Poverty Global Practice Africa Region Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized April 2015 1 ׀ RWANDA Poverty Assessment April 2015 ׀ RWANDA Poverty Assessment 2 RWANDA Poverty Assessment Poverty Global Practice Africa Region April 2015 3 ׀ RWANDA Poverty Assessment Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ................................................................................................10.... I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................... VIII11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................................12 IX 1. A Snapshot of Poverty in Rwanda ..........................................................................................................................12ix Rwanda‘s Poverty Profile: The Expected… ............................................................................................................13 x And the Rather Unexpected … .............................................................................................................................15 xii Inequality is high, driven by location, education, and occupation .......................................................................16 xiii Strong performance in health and basic education ................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda USADF Country Portfolio
    Rwanda USADF Country Portfolio Overview: Country program was established in 1986 and resumed U.S. African Development Foundation Partner Organization: in 2005 after a pause. USADF currently manages a portfolio of 24 Country Program Coordinator: Geoffrey Kayigi Africa Development Consultants projects and one Cooperative Agreement in Rwanda. PO Box 7210, CCOAIB Building, 3rd Floor Program Director: Rebecca Ruzibuka Total active commitment is $4.33 million. Agricultural investments Remera 1, Plot 2280, Umuganda Bld, Kigali Tel: +250.78.841.5194 total $3.66 million, off-grid energy investments total $348,778, and Tel: +250.78.830.3934 Email: [email protected] youth-led enterprise investments total $25,000. Email: [email protected] Country Strategy: The program focuses on smallholder farmer organizations across the country. Enterprise Duration Grant Size Description Coopérative des Agriculteurs de 2013-2017 $186,800 Sector: Agro-Processing (Maize) Maïs de Nyanza Town/City: Nyanza District, Southern Province (COAMANYA) Summary: The project funds will be used to construct a new factory and purchase approved equipment 2904-RWA and to expand marshland cultivation to another 130 hectares which will directly contribute to an increase of income for over 2,000 persons and promote food security in the area. Funds are also being used to roll out a pilot version of an innovative plot-mapping information system. Coopérative pour le 2015-2017 $78,700 Sector: Processing (Honey) Développement des Apiculteurs et Town/City: Nyamagabe District, Southern Province la Protection de l'Environnement Summary: The project funds will be used to supply beehives, harvesting equipment and to develop an (CODAPE) administrative and financial procedures manual and business plan, as well as to cover key staff 4113-RWA members’ salaries and basic administrative costs to enhance the cooperative’s capacity and boost its honey production and sales revenues.
    [Show full text]
  • Bugesera District Burera District Gakenke District Gasabo District
    Progress, but more effort Target achieved / on track Not on track N/A No data required Increase from last period Decrease from last period Proportion of Measles & Percentage of Proportion of Percentage of women Percentage of Rubella 2nd Delivery in Percentage of Newborn who new-born not Neonatal teenage receiving ANC 1 during ANC 4th mothers who dose (MR2) facility mother who received PNC 4 breathing service case delivery (19 postpartum 1st trimester standard visit Penta 3 received coverage, all coverage (w/ received PNC 4 Visit at 6 weeks successfully fatality years and Family coverage coverage BCG coverage coverage Iron+folic acid ages (BCG census-based Visit at 6 weeks after birth_new resuscitated rate_new under) planning (based on CBR) (based on CBR) (census-based) (census-based) during ANC denominator) target) 51.7 52.7 50.3 7.9 7.2 41.4 52 42.3 117 118.4 91.5 112.8 108 Bugesera District 76 75.3 84.3 5.3 8.3 71.6 51.7 40.5 84.8 87.4 96.7 121.2 69 Burera District 59.2 59.5 60.3 6.7 10.4 39.6 55.4 37.8 78.7 81.9 99.9 116.8 83 Gakenke District 24.4 24.5 70.7 4.4 3.3 28.3 52.8 35.7 123.2 117 59.6 87.7 124 Gasabo District 78.6 78 73.4 9.1 9.1 55 41.1 38 86.5 98.5 89.7 107.6 84 Gatsibo District 63.1 64.1 82 17.1 6.8 85.4 48.2 39.3 87.4 90.7 99 110.4 91 Gicumbi District 78.4 78.3 85.4 10.5 5.5 46.3 70.2 53.1 100.3 108.7 100 114.4 94 Gisagara District 61.6 63.2 68.2 15 4.4 64.5 50.8 36.1 91.5 89.8 100 101.1 95 Huye District 56 57.2 82.2 14.6 6.9 73.2 34.6 26.4 74.2 79.9 75.7 122.5 59 Kamonyi District 52.9 53 74.4 2.7 5.6 61.2 33.1 24
    [Show full text]
  • Gakenke District
    REPUBLIC OF RWANDA RWANDA TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (RTDA) FEEDER ROADS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (FRDP) REHABILITATION, UPGRADING AND MULTI-YEAR MAINTENANCE WORKS OF SELECTED FEEDER ROADS IN GAKENKE DISTRICT (LOT 1, 2&3 (69KM) UPDATED RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN GAKENKE DISTRICT April, 2020 Page 1 of 155 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Government of Rwanda (GoR) has received Additional Financing form Multi Donor Trust Funds (MDTF) for the Feeder Roads Development Project for rehabilitation of selected feeder roads in the six districts, namely Gatsibo, Nyagatare, Nyaruguru, Gakenke, Rutsiro and Nyabihu. In March 2017, the project prepared the Resettlement Action Plan for Feeder Roads rehabilitation in Gakenke district, however with the new contract approach of Design Build and Maintain (DBM) where contractor has to conduct detailed design, it was found necessary to update the initial RAP to take into consideration of the detailed design conducted by the contractors that have been hired in June and September 2019. This updated RAP identified new and old PAPs, their affected assets/properties, their value and provides a strategy for resettlement compensation to ensure that the PAPs’ livelihoods are restored or improved. The rehabilitation of the feeder roads requires the preparation of the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) to ensure that the planned activities are socially implemented in full compliance with Rwanda’s and the World Bank’s social policies and regulations. In this regards, RTDA/FRDP through Gakenke District employed JV CSC & EC, FAIR CONSTRUCTION and CHICO for updating the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) of the selected feeder roads of Gakenke, District. The present RAP report presents the main findings from Gakenke District.
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda Urban Development Project Phase Ii for Six Secondary Cities
    Public Disclosure Authorized RWANDA URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PHASE II FOR SIX SECONDARY CITIES Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN HUYE SECONDARY CITY Public Disclosure Authorized NOVEMBER 2019 Huye City ARAP Report Final i November 2019 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) AND ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLANS (RAP) FOR RWANDA URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (RUDP) – PHASE 2. FINAL ARAP REPORT CONTENTS Chapter Description Page LIST OF APPENDICES vi LIST OF OTHER VOLUMES vii LIST OF FIGURES viii LIST OF TABLES ix DEFINITIONS x ABBREVIATIONS xiv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY xvi 1 INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 Background and Objectives 1-1 1.1.1 Project Background 1-1 1.1.2 Project Objectives 1-1 1.2 Authority of the Report 1-1 1.3 Project Location 1-2 1.4 Objectives of the Resettlement Action Plan study 1-3 1.5 Methodology 1-4 1.5.1 Desktop Studies 1-4 1.5.2 Site Verification and Assessment 1-4 1.5.3 Sensitization of Project Affected Persons 1-4 (a) Public Meetings 1-4 (b) Official letters 1-5 (c) Utility companies 1-5 1.5.4 Determination of the Socio-economic Profile of PAPs 1-5 1.5.5 Preparation of the Land Acquisition Plan 1-6 1.5.6 Land and Asset Valuation 1-6 (a) Land Valuation 1-7 (b) Buildings/structures 1-8 (c) Crops, plants and trees 1-8 1.6 Cut-Off Dates for Compensation 1-9 1.7 Challenges Encountered During the Assignment. 1-9 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2-1 Huye City ARAP Report Final ii November 2019 2.1 RUDP Phase 2 Project 2-1 2.1.1 Selected Roads that would be upgraded in RUDP phase 2 including link-up footpaths 2-1 2.1.2 Stand-alone Drains and Outfall Drains 2-1 2.2 RUDP Phase 2 Sub-Project Components 2-2 2.2.1 Proposed Project Roads 2-2 (a) Selection of Road Corridors to be implemented 2-6 (b) Selected Road Designs 2-7 2.2.2 Stand-alone Drains and Outfall Drains Designs.
    [Show full text]
  • College of Science and Technology
    COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING) DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL AND ENERGY ENGINEERING MASTER OF SCIENCE IN RENEWABLE ENERGY Master’s Thesis DOMESTIC SOLAR ENERGY AS SOLUTION FOR NON- CONNECTED RURAL AREAS A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of Master of Science in Renewable Energy Submitted by MUSHIMIYIMANA Assia(Ref.No: 215027386) PROJECT ID: UR/ MEE/MSC- REN /006/2019 July 2019 DOMESTIC SOLAR ENERGY AS SOLUTION FOR NON CONNECTED RURAL AREAS (CASE STUDY: KAMONYI DISTRICT, RWANDA.) MUSHIMIYIMANA Assia MASTER OF SCIENCE (RENEWABLE ENERGY) UNIVERSITY OF RWANDA COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. 2019 ii DOMESTIC SOLAR ENERGY AS SOLUTION FOR NOCONNECTED RURAL AREAS (CASE STUDY: KAMONYI DISTRICT, RWANDA.) MUSHIMIYIMANA Assia SUPERVISOR:Dr MAZIMPAKA Erneste iii DEDICATION To my precious family and parents iv DECLARATION This thesis is my original work and has not been presented for a degree in any other university. Signature:.................................................Date......................................................... MUSHIMIYIMANA Assia This thesis has been submitted for examination with our approval as the university supervisor Signature:...............................................Date............................................................. Dr Erneste MAZIMPAKA University of Rwanda v ACKNOWLEGDEMENTS First, I am thankful to my husband, my sons, my parents and my siblings who have always encouraged me, supported me moral and spiritual. Your love, your inspiration is vast. Lastly ,I would like to thank my supervisor Dr Ernest MAZIMPAKA who kindly pushed me, advised me, guided me through this journey ,i appreciated your work and i recognize it modestly. vi ABSTRACT The electricity demand is very high worldwide. The energy growing needs consideration of environment protection. Some alternatives have been taken such as using renewable energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Project, Rwanda
    LAND PROJECT, RWANDA THE IMPACT OF GENDERED LEGAL RIGHTS TO LAND ON THE PREVALENCE AND NATURE OF INTRA- AND INTER-HOUSEHOLD DISPUTES September 2015 Strategic Objective 2 Contract No. AID-696-C-12-00002 Prepared For Prepared By U.S. Agency for International Development Chemonics International Inc. USAID/Rwanda Democracy and Governance 1717 H. Street NW #1 Office Washington, DC 20006 Contract No. AID-696-C-12-00002 Phone: 202-955-3300 Fax: 202-955-3400 www.chemonics.com THE IMPACT OF GENDERED LEGAL RIGHTS TO LAND ON THE PREVALENCE AND NATURE OF INTRA- AND INTER- HOUSEHOLD DISPUTES Final Research Report September 2015 This report is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) CONTACT INFORMATION: Anna Knox Chief of Party LAND Project Nyarutarama, Kigali Tel: +250 786 689 685 [email protected] The Impact of Gendered Legal Rights to Land on the Prevalence and Nature of Intra- and Inter-Household Disputes Contract No. AID-696-C-12-0002 Chemonics International, Inc. Recommended Citation Havugiyaremye Aimable, Dr. Simeon Wiehler, Dr. Wibabara Charity and Ndayisaba Daniel, with assistance and advice from Prof. Susana Lastarria-Cornhiel: The Impact of Gendered Legal Rights to Land on the Prevalence and Nature of Intra- and Inter- Household Disputes, Final Research Report, Kigali, Rwanda, 2015: USAID |LAND Project. This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Institute of Legal Practice and Development (ILPD) on behalf of LAND Project. The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Report 1 Preliminary Analysis and Diagnosis
    Developing Rwandan Secondary Cities as Model Green Cities with Green Economic Opportunities Report 1 Preliminary Analysis and Diagnosis Musanze Secondary City, Rwanda Rwanda Country Program March 2015 Developing Rwandan Secondary Cities as Model Green Cities with Green Economic Opportunities Report 1: Preliminary Analysis and Diagnosis This document is paginated for a two-sided printing. © Republic of Rwanda Ministry of Infrastructure © Global Green Growth Institute - Rwanda Country Program 19F Jeongdong Bldg. 21-15 Jeongdong-gil Jung-gu Seoul 100-784 Republic of Korea Table of Contents Table of Figures 5 List of Tables 5 Acronyms 7 Glossary 9 Executive Summary 13 Introduction 17 1.1 Project Background and Objectives 17 1.2 Overall Activities 18 1.2.1 Urbanization and Rural Settwlement Sector Strategic Plan 2012/13-17/18 18 1.2.2 National Strategy for Climate Change and Low-Carbon Development 19 1.3 The Secondary Cities 20 1.4 Scope of the Project 20 1.4.1 Component 1 21 1.4.2 Component 2 21 1.4.3 Component 3 21 1.5 Introduction to this report 22 Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of the District Development Level . 25 2.1 Introduction 25 2.2 National Economic Profile 25 2.2.1 Services and Infrastructure 25 2.2.2 Agriculture 26 2.2.3 Industry 27 2.2.4 Trade performance 27 2.2.5 Sustainable Tourism 27 2.3 General District Profiles 27 2.3.1 City of Kigal 30 2.3.2 Huye 30 2.3.3 Muhanga 31 2.3.4 Nyagatare 32 2.3.6 Musanze 32 2.3.7 Risizi 33 2.4 District Development Index (DDI) 33 2.4.1 Specific Methodology 33 2.4.2 Key Findings 36 2.4.3
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Causes of Financial And
    ANALYSIS OF THE CAUSES OF FINANCIAL AND NON- FINANCIAL WEAKNESSES IDENTIFIED IN THE AUDITOR GENERAL’S REPORTS OF DECENTRALIZED ENTITIES FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR ENDING 30 JUNE 2014 www.tirwanda.orgwww.tirwanda.org Transparency International Rwanda is a local chapter of a global movement with one vision: a world in which government, business, civil society and the daily lives of people are free of corruption. Since 2004, we are contributing to the fight against corruption in Rwanda to turn this vision into reality. www.tirwanda.org 2 © 2015 Transparency International Rwanda. All rights reserved. Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this report. All information was believed to be correct as of December 2015. Nevertheless, Transparency International Rwanda cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts. www.tirwanda.orgwww.tirwanda.org EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Transparency International Rwanda (TI-Rw) analyses expenditure- and non-expenditure related weaknesses of decentralized entities as highlighted in the Auditor General’s Report since 2012. The present analysis, a third of its kind, has focused on the reports for the financial year ending June, 2014 for all districts and the City of Kigali. This report is intended to broad audience including both interested public and public finance and local government stakeholders. The total monetary value related to the identified weaknesses in districts reached 112,650,524,574 RWF in the financial year 2013/14. This is a slight improvement to the year 2012/13. Still, this decrease marks only a marginal improvement equivalent to 1% of all identified weaknesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Search for Common Ground (SFCG): Land Programming in Rwanda
    1 Search For Common Ground (SFCG): Land Programming in Rwanda Final evaluation « Umurage w’Ejo, the Legacy for Tomorrow project: Land and Livelihood in Rwanda » European Union Midterm evaluation « Strengthen citizen participation around sensitive issues in order to prevent conflict in the Great Lakes Region » Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs March 2015 Compiled by: Florence Ferrari 2 Content 1. Executive summary ..................................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Project Overview .................................................................................................................. 4 1.2. Objectives of evaluation ....................................................................................................... 4 1.3. Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.4. Key findings ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.5. Recommendations ............................................................................................................... 7 2. Background information .............................................................................................................. 8 2.1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Projects overview .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]