DOCSLIB.ORG

Fuller, Heather Local Government Boundary Commission for England 14Th Floor Millbank Tower Millbank SW1P

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fuller, Heather Local Government Boundary Commission for England 14Th Floor Millbank Tower Millbank SW1P Fuller, Heather From: DEPIERO, Gloria Sent: 31 July 2015 09:22 To: reviews Subject: Enquiry Attachments: VSboundary reduced.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Local Government Boundary Commission for England 14th Floor Millbank Tower Millbank SW1P 4QP Our Ref: 31 July 2015 Re: I have been contacted by the above constituent. Please see the attached email. I would appreciate it if you could investigate the matter and advise me accordingly. Yours sincerely Gloria De Piero MP for Ashfield UK Parliament Disclaimer: This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail. 1 Email: 28th July2015 Dear Sir/Madam I am writing further in response to the Boundary Review and the proposed changes in relation to the current ward of Beauvale. My comments are in relation to the proposal to combine Brinsley with Eastwood rather than keep the current ward of Beauvale (Brinsley with Greasley). Ergo my comments may then be applied to consideration for the removal and the abandonment of the whole of the Beauvale Ward. I am writing as a resident of Brinsley, however until recently, I have also been a . I have grave concerns over such a proposed change due to the very different needs between a rural village and town. I am concerned that the Parish of Brinsley would not be adequately represented if combined with the town of Eastwood. It would be very hard to identify many commonalities between the two areas. Our needs are very different and wide ranging, whereas currently the Parish of Brinsley shares similarities and priorities with our nearest neighbour Greasley. I have included within my correspondence evidence to support my statements and comments and where able have provided reference to sources. My own comments are indicated with bold text and bullet points. • Your recent draft consultation document refers to a major road link between Eastwood and Brinsley, however it needs highlighting that the very road you refer to passes through Greasley, our nearest neighbour, before reaching Eastwood. In the other direction the very same road connects with Underwood in the Selston Parish. Brinsley also has a good road link to the Village of Jacksdale. I would question therefore whether this is a persuasive argument to support your proposal, I am of the firm opinion your statement serves no purpose in validating your recommendations. • Previous consultation documents shows a response from a Cllr who favours Brinsley merging with Eastwood, and states that Brinsley residents shop in Eastwood. For your information we have our own Post Office, newsagents, hairdressers, pharmacy, minimarket and mobile library in Brinsley. We also travel further afield for our shopping, beyond Eastwood, as there is lack of ‘expected’ town centre /high street names sited there. There is an abundance of take away and charity shops though. Additionally I must point out that the catchment secondary school for Brinsley children is Selston High School, the clue is in the name and not situated in Eastwood! Maybe this response is borne out of the fact that the Cllr represents a ward that would gain from your proposals? “while we acknowledge that Brinsley is a village, our tour of the area confirmed that it has good road links into the north of Eastwood.” 1 • The two share the course of what is known as the Brinsley Brook and furthermore share and enjoy greenbelt land and its footpaths. As you will see from the maps.Shown below, maps taken from DH Lawrence collection (Nottingham University) 3 • I would suggest that these long standing shared boundaries would be a strong argument to keep the two parishes together, given your own criteria below. “- the desirability of arriving at boundaries that are easily identifiable - the desirability of fixing boundaries so as not to break any local ties “ 4 • The relationship between the two Parishes has been positively enjoyed for many years in addition to the great historical significance shared by both over many centuries that is well documented. To change this now would change the course of history forever. This is of great concern not only for the years ahead but also for future generations to come. • As you will read on the following pages not only is the relationship between Brinsley and Greasley made clear you will also note that the reference to Beauvale is frequent, therefore I would also like to make clear that the removal of the ward of Beauvale would eradicate a long established name that has great significance to both Parishes. Indeed DH Lawrence looked towards Brinsley over the Parish of Greasley describing it as ‘the country of my heart’. He was not looking the other way into Eastwood! The following text is from a desktop search Nottinghamshire History (nottshistory.org.uk) Sheep+farming for wool had invaded Brinsley by 1281, for in that year Margery, widow of Gilbert de Brunnesley, the late lord of the manor, gave a bond to Robert SCot, a woolstapler of Nottingham to deliver to him half a saCk of Clean wool from her farm here by a speCified date. The village was growing and in 1303 Roger de Brunnesley had liCenCe to have "a Chapel in Brinsley in the parish of Greasley." Until that date the inhabitants had parished at Greasley, whose ChurCh was two miles away and difficult of aCCess in bad weather, but henCeforward they would probably be allowed to worship in this Chapel exCept upon speCial ocCasions when all had to attend the mother ChurCh Early mining. The tandem headstoCks on the site of Brinsley Colliery date from 1872. The Coal reserves at Brinsley were exhausted by 1930 (photo: A NiCholson, 2003). In 1392 the viCar of Greasley was granted liCenCe to bestow upon Beauvale Priory a gift of messuages, lands and rents, part of whiCh lay in Brinsley and the rest in neighbouring villages. In 1400 the priory, by an exChange of lands with Thomas Samon, obtained "divers messuages, lands, Coals, &C., in Selston, Underwood, Risshall in Selston, and in Brynnesley and Brynnesley Asshe." This is the earliest known referenCe to Coal+getting here, assuming that the referenCe to Coal applied to Brinsley, whiCh is probable. Coal was then beComing more generally used, and there must have been a considerable outcrop. The GeologiCal Survey states that "the outCrop of top hard Coal, stretChing visibly from, Eastwood, may be seen (1909) forming the floor of the quarry of the Stone Road Brick Works at Brinsley," but it was not until late in the 18th Century that Collieries were established in this viCinity though there had been workings at Selston in mediaeval time. It may have been because of this industry that the village was able to send as many as 14 men to the military muster in the time of Henry VIII. The Brunnesley interest ended early in the 17th Century, when Gilbert Brinsley sold the manor to Gilbert Millington, and the manor+house and demesne to PatriCk Cocke and others. During the Civil War, Millington was a prominent Parliamentarian, and when the war was over he sat as one of the regiCides who condemned the king to death. At the Restoration he was similarly condemned, but making abject submission, he saved his life, but not liberty, and died after seven years' Captivity. Wm. CoCke, on the other hand, fought for Charles, preserved his estate in 1660 by a fine of £195, and in 1659 partiCipated in Sir George Booth's rebellion; and esCaped further penalty by the Coming of the Restoration. 5 The subsequent history of Brinsley has been uneventful. In 1669 the village blacksmith, Robert Horsley, issued Copper tokens to overCome the prevalent shortage of small Change, and in 1733 the Duke of NewCastle fifteen farms brought in a total rental of only £145. Most, of the loCal soil was still waste: it was not until 1775 that the enclosure took plaCe and the land was developed; about that time the Coal industry was expanding and New Brinsley Came into being the making of the Canal expediting this progress. In 1838 a Chapel+of+ease was erected, whiCh was enlarged in 1877. In 1861 Brinsley became an ecClesiastiCal parish and in 1896 it was Created a Civil parish, Carved out of Greasley. A Century ago Brinsley was "a neat village" with a population of 1,139 now, thanks to its collieries and brickyards, the number of its inhabitants has nearly doubled. It was at the pit here that D.H. Lawrence's father went to work at the age of seven, and that distinguished author introduCed local sCenes into his "Sons and Lovers" where the village appears as Selby. The last 100 years have witnessed important Changes. Kimberley has been Carved out of the parish: Brinsley was detaChed in 1861; in 1877 Giltbrook and Gilthill were transferred to it from Nuthall whiCh reCeived Greasley's outlying portion of Hempshill. The Duke of Rutland's Castle Farm Estate passed to the Grammers and Earl Cowper, the Barbers and Rollestons beCame Chief loCal owners. But the aspeCt, especially around Beauvale, preserves muCh of its old woodland Charm and D. H. LawrenCe++the Nottinghamshire Thomas Hardy++has portrayed it in his various works. The Graymede of his "White PeaCoCk" is Felley Priory: Moorgreen reservoir he Calls Nethermere and High Close is the Lamb Close at the wider end of the lake.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nottinghamshire's Sustainable Community Strategy
    Nottinghamshire’s Sustainable Community Strategy the nottinghamshire partnership all together better 2010-2020 Contents 1 Foreword 5 2 Introduction 7 3 Nottinghamshire - our vision for 2020 9 4 How we put this strategy together What is this document based on? 11 How this document links with other important documents 11 Our evidence base 12 5 Nottinghamshire - the timeline 13 6 Nottinghamshire today 15 7 Key background issues 17 8 Nottinghamshire’s economy - recession and recovery 19 9 Key strategic challenges 21 10 Our priorities for the future A greener Nottinghamshire 23 A place where Nottinghamshire’s children achieve their full potential 27 A safer Nottinghamshire 33 Health and well-being for all 37 A more prosperous Nottinghamshire 43 Making Nottinghamshire’s communities stronger 47 11 Borough/District community strategies 51 12 Next steps and contacts 57 Nottinghamshire’s Sustainable Community Strategy 2010-2020 l p.3 Appendices I The Nottinghamshire Partnership 59 II Underpinning principles 61 III Our evidence base 63 IV Consultation 65 V Nottinghamshire - the timeline 67 VI Borough/District chapters Ashfield 69 Bassetlaw 74 Broxtowe 79 Gedling 83 Mansfield 87 Newark and Sherwood 92 Rushcliffe 94 VII Case studies 99 VIII Other relevant strategies and action plans 105 IX Performance management - how will we know that we have achieved our targets? 107 X List of acronyms 109 XI Glossary of terms 111 XII Equality impact assessment 117 p.4 l Nottinghamshire’s Sustainable Community Strategy 2010-2020 1 l Foreword This document, the second community strategy for Nottinghamshire, outlines the key priorities for the county over the next ten years.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter 150 August 2011
    protecting and improving the environment Newsletter 150 August 2011 Inside: The local Heritage Open Days programme, the Society 2011- 2012 Speakers programme and our first Membership Survey EDITORIAL “.. Beeston .. was always a sort of eyesore to us .. a wilderness of more or less squalid or vulgar little houses and mean shops .. a tolerably quiet sort of place and you rode or drove through it in a very few minutes.” These are the words of Catherine Mary Bearne written in the “Charlton Chronicles” circa 1860. How do you think the current Beeston (and district) compares and how do you think the Society is doing in meeting our objective of “ protecting and improving the environment ” ? In the centre pages of this issue is a survey intended as an opportunity for you to express your views about the work of the Society. Please do take the time to complete it and hand your response to a member of the Committee. A summary will appear in the December edition of the newsletter. Also enclosed with this edition is the local programme of Heritage Open Days and the 2011 – 2012 programme of Speakers. We try to distribute this information far and wide as both series of events have a great deal to offer but as always we appreciate the support of you as a member. So please do make notes in your diaries to attend, and also tell all your friends and neighbours ! DL - - - - - - - - - - - - COMMITTEE NEWS Your Committee meets monthly and various members will report on current topics as a “watching brief”. Among the items being monitored and discussed are; The three Wind Turbines currently being proposed by the University of Nottingham.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Works at Land Off Walker Street in Eastwood, Nottinghamshire
    Proposed Works at Land off Walker Street in Eastwood, Nottinghamshire Code for Sustainable Homes - Category 9: Ecology A report to: Kier Construction Marriott House Abbeyfield Road Nottingham NG7 2SZ By: EMEC Ecology The Old Ragged School Brook Street Nottingham NG1 1EA Tel: 0115 964 4828 Fax: 0115 964 4829 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.emec-ecology.co.uk December 2013 Proposed Works at Land off Walker Street in Eastwood, Nottinghamshire Code for Sustainable Homes - Category 9: Ecology CONTENTS Chapter Page No. Document 1: Ecological Walk-over Survey 4 1. Introduction 4 2. Biodiversity Baseline 6 2.1 Desk Study 6 2.2 Ecological Walk-over Survey 9 3. Ecological Evaluation of the Survey Area 15 3.1 General 15 3.2 Mitigation Recommendations 18 3.3 Furhter Survey Recommendations 18 4. Development Proposals 19 4.1 Landscape Proposals 19 4.2 General Site Enhancements 22 Document 2: Code for Sustainable Homes Assessment 25 A. Introduction 25 B. Eco 1: Ecological Value of Site 27 B.1 Aim and Credits Available 27 B.2 Assessment Criteria 27 B.3 Appointment of a Suitably Qualified Ecologist 27 B.4 Ecological Value of the Site and Achievable Credits 27 C. Eco 2: Ecological Enhancement 28 C.1 Aim and Credits Available 28 C.2 Assessment Criteria 28 C.3 Appointment of a Suitably Qualified Ecologist 28 C.4 Key Enhancement Recommendations 28 C.5 Additional Enhancement Recommendations 28 C.6 Achievable Credits 29 D. Eco 3: Protection of Ecological Features 30 D.1 Aim and Credits Available 30 D.2 Assessment Criteria 30 D.3 Achievable Credits 30 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk 2016
    East Midlands Summary 2016 he East Midlands Heritage at Risk Register now incorporates entries in the North Lincolnshire and North East Lincolnshire local authority areas, which were Tformerly included in the Yorkshire Heritage at Risk Register. This move reflects the responsibilities for planning advisory and statutory functions in these areas that are now vested in Historic England’s East Midlands team. We welcome the restoration of historic Lincolnshire – at least for Historic England’s purposes! This administrative realignment largely accounts for the increase in East Midlands Register entries in 2016. The bald statistics mask continued success in removing sites from the Register. Anthony Streeten, East Midlands Planning Director, who passed away this year, was a tireless champion of solutions to heritage at risk problems. Many fine places owe their new lease of life to him and the region will benefit from his foresight and work for years to come. Louise Brennan Acting Planning Director, East Midlands Anthony had key roles in Each year brings new information about important securing the futures of heritage that may be eligible for inclusion on the Register. The Crescent (see cover) We aim to follow up each referral not only with an and St Mary’s Freeby assessment, but also advice and in some cases, repair (following), both of which grants. We rely on our partners in local authorities, have been very complex church authorities and trusts to bring heritage at risk to cases. These buildings are our attention, and to help find solutions. simply too valuable for the nation to lose, but we This year Bromley House in Nottingham (a historic could have lost them subscription library) has entered the Register, along nevertheless.
    [Show full text]
  • Employment Bulletin EB03/17
    Employment Bulletin A Monthly Analysis of Employment, Unemployment and Jobs EB 03/17 February 2017 Key Facts Unemployment according to the Government’s preferred measure was 1.58 million in the * Claimant count in Nottinghamshire increases by 795 three months to January 2017, over the month. down 31,000 from the previous * Jobless total now 15,075. three months and down 106,000 from the same period a year ago. The unemployment * Claimant count rates in February (residence based); rate was 4.7%, down 0.1% from United Kingdom 1.9% the previous three months and East Midlands 1.6% down 0.3% from a year earlier. Nottinghamshire 2.1% The unemployment rate County 1.6% for 18-24 year olds was 10.9% in the three months to January City 3.2% 2017, down 0.6% on the quarter and down 1.1% on the year. * LFS Unemployment in the United Kingdom There were 438,000 1,580,000 or 4.7% of the workforce. unemployed young people aged from 18 to 24 in the quarter to January 2017. This is down by 27,000 on the quarter and down population which excludes those unemployed. The long-term by 60,000 over the year. not seeking or available for work. increase in the proportion of Comparisons of youth Unemployment rates are not the young people going into full- unemployment over time are proportion of the total time education reduces the size complicated by the fact that population who are unemployed. of the economically active unemployment rates are They are the proportion of the population and therefore calculated as the number of economically active population increases the unemployment unemployed people divided by (those in work plus those seeking rate.
    [Show full text]
  • MG15 2 2001 Complete.Pdf 6013KB 26 May 2018
    VOLUME 15 PART 2 JULY 2000 East Midlands Geological Society Contents President Vice-President Tony Morris Dr Richard Hamblin Mercian News 74 Geobrowser Secretary Treasurer News from BGS Alan Filmer Mrs Christine Moore From the Archives The Record - 2000 Editorial Board Dr Tony Waltham Tony Morris Dr John Carney Mrs Judy Rigby Michael Czajkowski 79 Dr Andy Howard Mrs Judy Small The source of the Woodhall Spa mineral water Council Mrs Jennifer Anderson Dr Andy Howard Mike Rosenbaum 87 John Aram Mrs Sue Miles Nottingham Trent Geohazards Group Colin Bagshaw Dr Ian Sutton professorial lectures Jack Brown Neil Turner Dr Beris Cox Dr Tony Waltham Dr Peter Gutteridge Dr Adrian Watson Graham Lott 97 Geology and building stones Address for Correspondence in the East Midlands The Secretary, E.M.G.S. Rose Cottage, Chapel Lane, Epperstone, Nottingham NG14 6AE Landmark of Geology 123 0115 966 3854 [email protected] The Fauld crater – Tony Waltham The Mercian Geologist is published by the East Midlands Geological Society and printed by Reports 126 Norman Printing Ltd (Nottingham and London) on Trent valley floods – John Carney paper made from wood pulp from renewable forests, Sand towers on Tenerife – Phil and Judy Small where replacement exceeds consumption. Ice wedge at Thornhaugh – Richard Hamblin A very large Bradgatia – Helen Boynton No part of this publication may be reproduced in Stonework of St Pancras – Eric Robinson any printed or electronic medium without the prior Pleistocene Peterborough – Harry Langford written consent of the Society.
    [Show full text]
  • East Midlands
    East Midlands Initial proposals Contents Initial proposals summary .............................................................................. 3 1. What is the Boundary Commission for England? ........... 5 2. Background to the 2013 Review ...................................................... 6 3. Initial proposals for the East Midlands region ................... 9 Initial proposals for the Lincolnshire sub-region .................................................................. 9 Initial proposals for the Derbyshire sub-region ..................................................................... 10 Initial proposals for the Northamptonshire, Leicestershire, and Nottinghamshire sub-region ............................................................................................................................................ 11 4. How to have your say ................................................................................. 14 Annex: Initial proposals for constituencies, including wards and electorates ........................................................................................ 17 Glossary ............................................................................................................................ 33 Initial proposals summary Who we are and what we do of constituencies allocated to each sub- region is determined by the electorate of the The Boundary Commission for England is an combined local authorities. independent and impartial non-departmental public body which is responsible for reviewing
    [Show full text]
  • The State and the Country House in Nottinghamshire, 1937-1967
    THE STATE AND THE COUNTRY HOUSE IN NOTTINGHAMSHIRE, 1937-1967 Matthew Kempson, BSc. MA. Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy March 2006 Abstract This thesis considers the state preservation and use of Nottinghamshire country houses during the mid-twentieth century, from the initiation of mass requisition in 1937 until 1967 when concerns for architectural preservation moved away from the country house. This thesis reviews literature on the landed estate in the twentieth century and the emergence of preservationist claims on the country house. Three substantive sections follow. The first discusses the declining representation of landowners within local governance in Nottinghamshire and the constitution of the County Council, and considers how estate space was incorporated within broadened concerns for the preservation of the historic environment and additionally provided the focus for the implementation of a variety of modern state and non-state functions. The second section considers how changing policy and aesthetic judgements impacted upon the preservation of country houses. Through discussion of Rufford Abbey, Winkburn Hall and Ossington Hall I consider the complexities of preservationist claims and how these conflicted with the responsibilities of the state and the demands of private landowners. The third section considers how estate space became valued by local authorities in the implementation of a variety of new modern educational uses, including the teacher training college at Eaton Hall and a school campus development at Bramcote Hills. The thesis concludes by considering the status of the country house in Nottinghamshire since 1967, and contemporary demands on the spaces considered historically in this study.
    [Show full text]
  • NLHA SUMMER DAY SCHOOL at BEAUVALE PRIORY Friday 3Rd July 2015
    NLHA Working together ~ what we do best. Volume 1, Issue 22 May 2015 NLHA SUMMER DAY SCHOOL AT BEAUVALE PRIORY Friday 3rd July 2015 Beauvale Priory ‘beautiful valley’ Our first Summer day school will be held on Friday 3rd July 2015, at Beauvale Priory, Moorgreen, Notts NG16 2AA Starting at 9.30am, the day will include A guided tour of the Priory by owner Ann Whyte, and a unique opportunity to see Source: Jane Abrams Jan 2015 the Beauvale Priory Cartulary, recently transcribed & privately published. Two illustrated talks: - Remains above ground – an overview of Nottinghamshire’s mediaeval religious houses The history of mining in DH Lawrence country Choice of two guided walks around the area, led by local historians – one approx. 4.5 miles, one approx. 2 miles (suitable footwear and clothing will be essential). Complementary tea/coffee, morning and afternoon. A delicious lunch in the Priory tearoom (not included in the price, to be ordered and paid for on arrival). Places are strictly limited to 30 persons, on a first come, first served basis. Cost £7 plus lunch - Tickets must be produced for admission. To get a ticket, print off the form included in this Newsletter and send it with payment to the Treasurer at 35, Sycamore Road, East Leake, Loughborough, LE12 6PP If over-subscribed, the day school will be repeated provided there are sufficient numbers To become a member, send an application form (in this newsletter) and £10 to the Treasurer. See www.beauvalepriory.co.uk for history and further information about the Priory. First Summer Day School - Friday 3rd July 2015 Beauvale Priory ‘beautiful valley’ BOOKING FORM – please complete one per ticket Name………………………………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Building Stones in the East Midlands Graham Lott
    Geology and building stones in the East Midlands Graham Lott Abstract. The East Midlands has a diverse heritage of stone buildings reflecting the varied character of the regions geological strata. The principal stones used in the buildings of the area are described and identified and placed in their modern stratigraphic context. This very diversity, however, while providing a colourful backdrop to the villages and towns of the area for all to enjoy, presents an increasing problem to those concerned with conserving these structures, as many of the stones are now no longer quarried. With the increasingly rapid expansion and Publications concerned with the building stones of development of our cities, towns and villages, by the an area are often focused on their use in the addition of rather bland, mass-produced brick built archaeology or conservation of historic structures. housing developments, metal clad factories and However, the building stone industry has never been glass-fronted office blocks, the end of a millennium concerned with providing stone solely for is perhaps a particularly suitable time to reflect upon conservation purposes. Today, stone quarrying in the diverse and colourful use of local building the East Midlands area for new building work, such materials in the past. as the Law Courts in Nottingham (Birchover The East Midlands has a distinctive character Stone), town centre developments at Bakewell which is well expressed in the wealth and variety of (Stanton Moor Stone) and the new visitor centre at Southwell Minster (White Mansfield Stone), is still vernacular buildings it has produced over the last an important part of the local economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Ref: 000177/14
    Our Ref: 000177/14 Freedom of Information Section Nottinghamshire Police HQ Sherwood Lodge, Arnold Nottingham NG5 8PP Tel: 101 Ext 800 2507 Fax: 0115 967 2896 6 February 2014 Request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) I write in connection with your request for information, which was received by Nottinghamshire Police on 09/01/2014. Following receipt of your request searches were conducted within Nottinghamshire Police to locate the information you require. Please find below answers to your questions:- I would like a better understanding of car theft, as much data as you have in relation to this crime but more specifically utopia would be a CSV file or equivalent showing car thefts from 2012 detailing postcode vehicle taken from, make and model and year of registration and whether a recovery of the vehicle was made. RESPONSE Under S 1 (1) (a) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA), I can confirm that Nottinghamshire Police does hold the information you have requested. This information is not recorded in an easily retrievable format. Information relating to the make and model of vehicle, the year of registration and the post code of the crime location are not always recorded within a searchable field and may be contained within the body of the crime report itself. Therefore, to locate, retrieve and extract the requested information would require a manual search of each crime record to fully ascertain all the requested details. An initial search revealed a total of 2595 records over the period requested. It is estimated that to search one record and extract all the requested data would take 5-10 minutes for one record which would equate to approximately 216.25 working hours (at the more conservative estimate of 5 minutes per record).
    [Show full text]
  • Care and Support Services Directory 2018/19
    Care and Support Services Directory 2018/19 The comprehensive guide to choosing and paying for care and support Support at home • Somewhere to live • Useful contacts Home. There’s no place like it. Being able to live at home can be one of the most important comforts in an older person’s life, and because family and friends can’t always be Home.there Home Instead Senior Care is here to help. There’s no place like it. ensures dignity. e believe in continuity of care our clients see the same CAREivers time and time again allowing a relationship based on trust and companionship to develop. ur visitsNottinghamshire’s are typically an hour or more providing 1st time Home for our CAREivers Care to Providerdeliver high quality tocare andbe truly getrated to know their“outstanding” clients. by CQC ther care companies may say they specialise in dementia care however we can prove it. e have developed our bespoke Alzheimer’s CARE programme which is endorsed by City and uilds to train our CAREivers in specialised communication skills to help interact and build relationships with clients living with dementia. For us nothing is more important“People than providing a convenientdescribed and reliable caretheir solution carethat works for everyone in your family. as exceptional” CQC From ust an hour or two a week to full time care our service is available hours a day and is tailored to My sister and I were not prepared your personal needs. ur Services tailored to your needs for the emotional and physical demands that our mother’s Alzheimer’s placed on us.
    [Show full text]