DOCSLIB.ORG

Population Dynamics and Management of Brown Bears On

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Population Dynamics and Management of Brown Bears On POPULATION DYNAMICS AND MANAGEMENT OF BROWN BEARS ON KODIAK ISLAND, ALASKA A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy with a Major in Natural Resources in the College of Graduate Studies University of Idaho by Lawrence J. Van Daele February 2007 Major Professor: Edward O. Garton, Ph.D. ii iii ABSTRACT Brown bear (Ursus arctos) populations along the North Pacific Rim are generally healthy and an important economic resource, yet there are few long-term studies of their population dynamics and harvest management. This project gathered information on the population dynamics of bears on Kodiak Island, Alaska to develop an easily understood model for use by managers to develop harvest strategies and guidelines. I investigated a geographically closed brown bear population with no impassable physical barriers from 1982-2004. I hypothesized that Kodiak had a single bear population that could occupy any habitat and would use the best resources available. I investigated 402 marked bears within 4 diverse study areas, including 261 that were radiocollared, yielding 15,539 relocations. Mean home ranges for females were significantly smaller than males, and varied between areas. There was considerable home range overlap and no evidence of territoriality. Topography, vegetation, and salmon availability varied between areas, as did denning habitat and chronology. Elevations used by bears varied by area, reproductive status, and season. Most variations appeared to be related to resource availability. Reproductive fitness and bear densities were comparable in all areas. Generations of behavioral specialization have resulted in a population that is a radiating continuum in which bears that lived adjacent to each other used similar resources, but those living apart used different resources. Mitochondrial DNA analysis confirmed the hypothesis that bears on Kodiak were a single population; however resource use patterns rejected the hypothesis that all bears used the same “optimal” habitat. This ecological flexibility resulted in a higher carrying capacity than if all bears conformed to uniform habitat use patterns. I created a model that used population and harvest inputs to derive estimates of population change and the number of trophy-sized bears. Model validation suggested the Kodiak bear population was healthy and productive as it supported a sustainable harvest that yielded consistently large bears. To obtain refined harvest strategies, managers must consider local population parameters, management objectives, harvest characteristics, and confidence levels. There is no single harvest rate that is applicable to all situations. iv DEDICATION This work is dedicated to the brown bears on the Kodiak Archipelago. Without their tolerance and cooperation this project would never have been possible. Photo by Matthew Van Daele v TABLE OF CONTENTS AUTHORIZATION TO SUBMIT DISSERTATION................................................... ii ABSTRACT......................................................................................................................iii DEDICATION.................................................................................................................. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................. v LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................ vii LIST OF TABLES .........................................................................................................viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................. x INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 1: Ecological flexibility of brown bears on Kodiak Island, Alaska.......... 2 Abstract........................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction..................................................................................................................... 3 Study Area ......................................................................................................................4 Methods........................................................................................................................... 8 Results........................................................................................................................... 11 Capture, Collaring and Data Collection.................................................................... 11 Home Range and Utilization Distribution ................................................................ 12 Habitat Availability and Use..................................................................................... 13 Cub Dispersal............................................................................................................ 14 Seasonal Movements ................................................................................................ 14 Denning..................................................................................................................... 16 Discussion..................................................................................................................... 17 Management Implications............................................................................................. 23 Literature Cited ............................................................................................................. 24 Appendix....................................................................................................................... 45 CHAPTER 2: Management of brown bear hunting on Kodiak Island, Alaska ....... 48 Abstract......................................................................................................................... 48 Introduction................................................................................................................... 49 Study Area .................................................................................................................... 50 Methods......................................................................................................................... 52 Capture...................................................................................................................... 52 Data Collection ......................................................................................................... 52 Data Analysis............................................................................................................ 53 Model Development.................................................................................................. 53 Results........................................................................................................................... 54 Survival Rates ........................................................................................................... 54 vi Harvest ...................................................................................................................... 55 Model ........................................................................................................................ 56 Discussion..................................................................................................................... 57 Survival Rates ........................................................................................................... 57 Harvest ...................................................................................................................... 59 Model ........................................................................................................................ 60 Management Implications............................................................................................. 61 Literature Cited ............................................................................................................. 62 Appendix....................................................................................................................... 75 vii LIST OF FIGURES CHAPTER 1 Ecological flexibility of brown bears on Kodiak Island, Alaska Figure 1.1. Kodiak Archipelago, Alaska, including the 4 brown bear study areas. (TLH – Terror Lake, ZSP – Zachar/Spiridon, SWK – southwest Kodiak, and ALK – Aliulik Peninsula) and vegetative cover types, 1982-2004. .......................................... 30 Figure 1.2. Minimum convex polygon (100%) home ranges for all female bears with >30 relocations, Kodiak Island, Alaska, 1982-2004................................................. 31 Figure 1.3. Fixed kernel (95%) utilization distribution areas for all female bears with >30 relocations, Kodiak Island, Alaska, 1982-2004................................................. 32 Figure 1.4. Vegetative cover types (percentage of total area excluding marine habitat) within each study area (TLH – Terror Lake, ZSP – Zachar/Spiridon, SWK – southwest Kodiak, and ALK – Aliulik Peninsula), Kodiak Island, Alaska, 1982-2004 ......................................................................................................................... 33 Figure 1.5. Biweekly mean elevations of radio collared female bears that were with new cubs by study area (TLH – Terror Lake,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kodiak 18 Bear Essentials
    The Grizzlies of Kodiak: up close and personal An unique, exclusive, six person photographic experience to the remote bear habitat of Alaska’s Kodiak Island with Andy Skillen. September 2018 GBP6,595; US$8,350 (based on double occupancy) The Bear Essentials… The largest bear ever killed in North America was from Kodiak Island with a total skull size of 30.75 in (78.1 cm), and 8 of the top 10 brown bears listed in the Boone and Crockett record book are from Kodiak. The Kodiak Brown Bear (Ursus arctos middendorffi), is the largest subspecies of brown bear. These bears can weigh up to 1500 lb. (682 kg) or more and they occupy the islands of the Kodiak Archipelago in Southwestern Alaska. The bears’ traditional name in the Alutiiq language is Taquka-aq (Tah-goo-kuk) Taxonomy Taxonomist C.H. Merriam was the first to recognize Kodiak bears as unique and he named the species in honor of the celebrated Russian naturalist Dr. A. Th. von Middendorff. Subsequent taxonomic revisions merged most North American brown bears into a single subspecies (Ursus arctos horribilis), but Kodiak bears are still considered to be a unique subspecies (Ursus arctos middendorffi). Recent investigations of genetic samples from bears on Kodiak have shown that they are closely related to brown bears on the Alaska Peninsula and Kamchatka, Russia. It appears that Kodiak bears have been genetically isolated since at least the last ice age (10,000 to 12,000 years ago) and there is very little genetic diversity within the population. Although the current population is healthy and productive and has shown no overt adverse signs of inbreeding, it may be more susceptible to new diseases or parasites than other more diverse brown bear populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Deepp Patel 5/1/15 Polar Bears and Kodiak Bears Kodiak Bears And
    Deepp Patel 5/1/15 Polar Bears and Kodiak Bears Kodiak bears and Polar bears are alike and different in many ways. They both are the largest bear families. They both eat animals but eat different things. Kodiak bears and Polar bears don’t live near each other. However they both live in the same hemisphere. Kodiak bears and Polar bears have a large appearance. They both are the two largest bear families. Polar bears appear white but the fur is actually transparent, but on the other hand Kodiak bears have color that ranges from blonde to orange to dark brown fur. Kodiak bear females are 500-700 pounds, but Polar bear females are 330-650 pounds. Kodiak bear males are 800-1500, however Polar bear males are 755-1600 pounds. The average Kodiak bear male is eight feet up to ten feet tall, but on the other hand Polar bears may be up to 12 feet tall. Polar bears and Kodiak bears both have cubs. The two kinds of cubs live in dens Kodiak cubs are born during January or February, but Polar cubs are born during November to January. Both kinds of cubs stay with their mother for a few years. Kodiak cubs stay with their mother for three years but Polar cubs stay a little over two years. A typical Kodiak bear litter has 2 or 3 cubs but a typical Polar bear litter has 1 to 2 cubs. Kodiak bears and Polar bears eat a lot of things. They both eat animals. They both are carnivores too.
    [Show full text]
  • MBB Game Notes
    For Immediate Release: February 27, 2019 BROWN (17-9, 5-5 Ivy) vs. COLUMBIA (7-17, 2-8 Ivy) - Friday, March 1, 2019; 5:00 pm (ESPNU) and vs. CORNELL (13-13, 5-5 Ivy) - Saturday, March 2, 2019; 6:00 pm (ESPN+) Pizzitola Sports Center; Providence, R.I. TV: ESPNU (Jon Meterparel and Noah Savage); ESPN+ (Nick Coit and Adam Giardino) RADIO: WPRV-AM 790 (Scott Cordischi and Russ Tyler ’71) Brown’s Probable Starters: Forward 25 Tamenang Choh, sophomore (12.8 ppg, 8.9 rpg) Forward 44 Matt DeWolf, sophomore, (3.0 ppg, 3.1 rpg) Guard 4 Obi Okolie, senior (11.7 ppg, 4.0 rpg) Guard 20 Zach Hunsaker, junior (5.7 ppg, 2.2 rpg) Guard 24 Desmond Cambridge, sophomore (16.1 ppg, 3.6 rpg) Key Reserves: 2 Brandon Anderson, junior, guard (9.0 ppg, 1.9 rpg, 2.5 apg) 5 Joshua Howard, junior, forward (7.8 ppg, 4.2 rpg) 3 George Mawanda-Kalema, sophomore, guard (5.5 ppg, 1.9 rpg) 11 Chris Sullivan, senior, guard (2.7 ppg, 1.5 rpg) 0 David Mitchell, freshman, guard (2.6 ppg, 2.5 rpg) Senior Day on Saturday: Brown will honor its three seniors prior to Saturday’s game against Cornell, recognizing Travis Fuller, Obi Okolie and Chris Sullivan. The Bears: Brown earned its first Ivy weekend sweep since 2014, defeating Harvard, 88-79, and Dartmouth, 68-65, last week. The win over the Crimson, fueled by 30 points by Desmond Cambridge, was Brown’s first over Harvard since 2009. Brandon Anderson came off the bench to score a season high 21 points in the Bears’ win over the Big Green.
    [Show full text]
  • Grizzly/Brown Bear
    556 Suggested citation: Schwartz, C. C., S. D. Miller, and M.A. Haroldson. 2003. Grizzly bear. Pages 556-586 in G. A. Feldhamer, B. C. Thompson, and J. A. Chapman, editors. Wild Mammals of North America: Biology, Management, and Conservation. Second edition. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Charles C. Schwartz Grizzly Bear Sterling D. Miller _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________(Ursus arctos) Mark A. Haroldson__ NOMENCLATURE is considered obsolete (Waits et al. 1998a). As summarized by Common Names. Brown bear, grizzly bear, Kodiak bear Craighead and Mitchell (1982) and Waits et al. (1998a), Rausch Scientific Name. Ursus arctos Linnaeus (1963) identified two extant subspecies of brown bears in North America primarily from skull measurements. He classified bears The grizzly bear inspires fear, awe, and respect in humans to a degree from the mainland as U. arctos horribilis Ord and those from the unmatched by any other North American wild mammal. Like other Kodiak Island archipelago as U. a. middendorffi Merriam. Rausch bear species, it can inflict serious injury and death on humans and (1963) reconsidered his earlier classification (Rausch 1953) of the sometimes does. Unlike the polar bear (Ursus maritimus) of the bears from the Alaska Peninsula as being a distinct subspecies (U. a. sparsely inhabited northern arctic, however, grizzly bears still live in gyas Merriam). Kurtén (1973) used skull measurements from Rausch areas visited by crowds of people, where presence of the grizzly (1963) to propose three North American subspecies, U. a. remains physically real and emotionally dominant. A hike in the middendorffi from Kodiak Island archipelago, U. a. dalli Merriam of wilderness that includes grizzly bears is different from a stroll in a southern coastal regions of the Alaska panhandle, including the forest from which grizzly bears have been purged; nighttime islands of Admiralty, Baranof, and Chichagof (ABC), and U.
    [Show full text]
  • Ak-Mnailia-Fab-Hetc
    Hunt ID: AK-BBearBRBearGBearSheepGoatMooseCaribouSDeer-M1NAILIA-F1AB-HE1TC Welcome to the Big Bear County of Alaska We offer the unique experience of personal attention; we are a small outfit which means that you won't get lost in the shuffle. When you book a hunt with us you will get an experienced, professional hunting guide not a "warm body with a guide's license". We help you prepare for your hunt before you arrive by helping get your gear organized, logistics arranged, and plans ironed out. All of this allows for better service and better success, as our past hunters will attest to. Don't hesitate to ask for our list of references. We are dedicated to making your adventure hunt as successful as possible. We operate in many different remote and scenic parts of Alaska allowing us to choose the area’s best suited to you and the game you wish to pursue. Whether it is brown or grizzly bear, Dall sheep, mountain goat, moose, caribou, Sitka deer, black bear, wolf or wolverine we can make it happen. We hold a sole use guide concession in the Denali Preserve adjacent to Denali Park. Being the only outfitter in this area gives us the opportunity to hunt hundreds of square miles without added pressure from other guides. We hunt Kodiak Island, the Alaska Range, and from our full service hunting/fishing lodge in the Lake Iliamna area. Before we get deep into the hunting I want to fill you in on the processes of getting a license for the big bears.
    [Show full text]
  • Denning Characteristics of Brown Bears on Kodiak Island, Alaska Author(S): Lawrence J
    Denning Characteristics of Brown Bears on Kodiak Island, Alaska Author(s): Lawrence J. Van Daele, Victor G. Barnes, Jr., Roger B. Smith Source: Bears: Their Biology and Management, Vol. 8, A Selection of Papers from the Eighth International Conference on Bear Research and Management, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, February 1989 (1990), pp. 257-267 Published by: International Association of Bear Research and Management Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3872927 Accessed: 03/01/2009 19:57 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=iba. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Kodiak Bear Medicine Brochure
    Kodiak Bear Medicine January 25-27, 2019 Twin of the Grizzly Bear Great teachings in physical and spiritual realms The Kodiak bear (Ursus arctos middendorffi), also known as the Kodiak brown bear, sometimes the Alaskan brown bear, inhabits the islands of the Kodiak Archipelago in southwest Alaska. It is the largest recognized subspecies of brown bear, and one of the two largest bears alive today, the other being the polar bear. While there has been much confusion about the taxonomy of brown bears (Ursus arctos), taxonomists agree there are at least two subspecies in North America -- the grizzly bear (U. a. horribilis) and the Kodiak bear (U. a. middendorffi). The bear, an ancient spirit animal worshiped in many traditions The bear as a spirit animal or totem is one of the most ancient worshiped animals. Remains of bears have been found in many archeological sites in Europe especially, where bear bones and skulls were found together with human bones dating back to the Neanderthals. It is said that the Vikings would wear bear skins in times of war to scare off their enemies. They would appear as powerful as these wild animals. Bears symbolize warrior spirit and courage to fight. The bear’s spirit would be invoked to help the warriors in the battle. In ancient Greece and Rome, the bear was a totem animal associated with the Goddess Artemis and Diana, goddesses of fertility. In contrast, for the Celts, the bear would represent the sun. The spirit of the bear and healing Since the bear is often associated with shamans in many traditions, this spirit animal can symbolize healing abilities and stepping into the role of the healer.
    [Show full text]
  • CASE STUDY #9 the TERROR LAKE CASE1 Background Kodiak Island
    CASE STUDY #9 THE TERROR LAKE CASE1 Background Kodiak Island lies several hundred miles southwest of Anchorage in the Gulf of Alaska. Blanketed in forests and laced with free-flowing rivers, the area provides prime habitat for the Kodiak brown bear, (Ursus arctos middendorffi), bald eagles, mountain goats, Pacific salmon, and other Arctic species. Much of the island falls within the bounds of the Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge, which was established by executive order in 1941 to protect the feeding and breeding grounds for the Kodiak brown bear and other native species.2 Since then, the boundaries have been altered, but the refuge still encompasses more than two-thirds of the island. Despite its proximity to Anchorage, the island is fairly inaccessible and sparsely populated with somewhere between 5,000 and 7,000 residents, most of whom live in the town of Kodiak. The local economy is based almost entirely on the fishing industry and supports roughly a dozen cannery operations year-round.3 The refuge with its bears and the local residents with their canneries peacefully coexisted until the early 1970s when, faced with rising diesel fuel costs and projected increases in energy demand, the Kodiak Electric Association (KEA) decided to build a 30,000 kilowatt hydroelectric facility on lands within and immediately adjacent to the refuge. In 1976 the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) granted the small, rural electric cooperative a preliminary permit to develop the site, which included Terror Lake and Terror River, both of which are within refuge boundaries. The project was to consist of a dam at Terror Lake, which would raise the water level nearly 150 feet and flood 480 acres, a powerhouse located in the Kizhuyak River Basin adjacent to the refuge, and a diversion tunnel connecting the reservoir and powerhouse.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Brown University Football Media Guide
    2009 Brown University Football Media Guide 2009 Brown Co-Captain Paul Jasinowski ’10, David Howard ’10, First Team All-Ivy First Team All-Ivy 2009 Brown Football Schedule Defending Ivy League Champions 9/19 Sat. at Stony Brook .......... 6:00 p.m. 10/24 Sat. at Cornell ............. 12:30 p.m. 9/25 Fri. at Harvard .............. 7:00 p.m. 10/31 Sat. PENN ................ 12:30 p.m. 10/3 Sat. *RHODE ISLAND ....... 12:30 p.m. 11/7 Sat. at Yale ................ 12:30 p.m. 10/10 Sat. HOLY CROSS ........... 12:30 p.m. 11/14 Sat. DARTMOUTH .......... 12:30 p.m. 10/17 Sat. #PRINCETON (TV –Versus) 12:30 p.m. 11/21 Sat. at Columbia ............ 12:30 p.m. *Homecoming # Family Weekend Head Coach: Phil Estes 2009 Brown Football 2008 Ivy League Champions Brown Facts Contents Location ....................................................... Providence, RI 1 . ..Brownfacts Founded ............................................................. 1764 2 . ..AboutBrown President ..................................................... Ruth J. Simmons 4 . World Class Student-Athletes Enrollment ............................................................ 5,874 5 . Brown In TheCommunity Nickname ............................................................ Bears 6 . Success After Graduation Colors ........................................... Seal Brown, Cardinal Red, White 8 . Prominent BrownAlumni Stadium ..................................... Brown Stadium (20,000), Natural Grass 9 . .TheIvyLeague Director of Athletics ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Adoption of Pottery on Kodiak Island: Insights from Organic Residue Analysis
    This is a repository copy of The adoption of pottery on Kodiak Island: Insights from organic residue analysis. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/166463/ Version: Published Version Article: Admiraal, Marjolein orcid.org/0000-0002-9830-8032, Lucquin, Alexandre Jules Andre orcid.org/0000-0003-4892-6323, Von Tersch, Matthew et al. (2 more authors) (2020) The adoption of pottery on Kodiak Island: Insights from organic residue analysis. Quaternary International. pp. 128-142. ISSN 1040-6182 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2020.06.024 Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. This licence allows you to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as you credit the authors for the original work. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Quaternary International 554 (2020) 128–142 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary International journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quaint The adoption of pottery on Kodiak Island: Insights from organic residue analysis Marjolein Admiraal a,b,*, Alexandre Lucquin b, Matthew von Tersch b, Oliver E. Craig b, Peter D. Jordan a a Arctic Centre, Groningen Institute for Archaeology, University of Groningen, Aweg 30, 9718CW, Groningen, the Netherlands b BioArCh Laboratory, University of York, Wentworth Way, Heslington, YO10 5NG, UK ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Pottery technology, originating in Northeast Asia, appeared in Alaska some 2800 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Fish and Wildlife
    Alasha Habitat Management Guide Life Histories and Habitat Requirements of Fish and Wildlife Produced b'y State of Alasha Department of Fish and Game Division of Habitat Iuneau, Alasha 1986 @ Tgge BY TTIE AI.ASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AI{D GA}IE Contents Achnowtedgemena v i i Introduction 3 0verview of Habitat l{anagement Guides Project 3 Background 3 Purpose 3 Appl ications 4 Statewide volumes 6 Regional volumes 9 0rganization and Use of this Volume 10 Background 10 Organization 10 Species selection criteria 10 Regional Overview Surmaries 11 Southwest Region 11 Southcentral Region 13 Arctic Region 15 hlestern and Interior regions L7 ,lf{atnmals Mari ne Manmal s --BEfiEti-Thale zr Bowhead whale 39 Harbor seal 55 Northern fur seal 63 Pacific walrus 7L Polar bear 89 Ringed seal 107 Sea otter 119 Steller sea lion 131 ffiTerrestrial Mamrnals Brown bear 149 Caribou 165 Dall sheep 175 El k 187 Moose 193 Si tka bl ack-tai'led deer 209 1,1,L Contents (continued) Birds Bald Eagle 229 Dabbl ing ducks 241 Diving ducks 255 Geese 27L Seabirds 29L Trumpeter swan 301 Tundra swan 309 Fish Freshwater/Anadromous Fi sh en 3L7 Arctic aray'ling 339 Broad whitefish 361 Burbot 377 Humpback whitefish 389 Lake trout 399 Least cisco 413 Northern pike 425 Rainbow trout/steelhead 439 Sa I mon Chum 457 Chinook 481 Coho 501 Pink 519 Sockeye 537 Sheefish 555 l.lari ne Fi sh cod 57L --ffiiTCapel in 581 Pacific cod 591 Pacific hal ibut 599 Pacific herring 607 Pacific ocean perch 62L Sablefish 629 Saffron cod 637 Starry flounder 649 t{al leye pol lock 657 Yelloweye rockfish 667 Yel lowfin sole 673 Contents (continued) Shel I fi sh crab 683 King crab 691 -ungenessRazor clam 709 Shrimp 7L5 Tanner crab 727 Appendi ces A.
    [Show full text]
  • College Football Conferences
    Big 12 College 6Ohio State Buckeyes Football 4Oklahoma Sooners Conferences ACC 7Michigan Wolverines 15Texas Longhorns 2Clemson Tigers 12Penn State Nittany Lions FBS (Division I-A) 24Iowa State Cyclones 20Syracuse Orange Michigan State Spartans (Athletic Scholarships) 16West Virginia Mountaineers NC State Wolfpack Maryland Terrapins American Athletic TCU Horned Frogs Boston College Eagles Indiana Hoosiers Houston Cougars Baylor Bears Florida State Seminoles Rutgers Scarlet Knights Memphis Tigers Kansas State Wildcats Wake Forest Demon Deacons 22Northwestern Wildcats Tulane Green Wave Texas Tech Red Raiders Louisville Cardinals Wisconsin Badgers SMU Mustangs Oklahoma State Cowboys Pittsburgh Panthers Purdue Boilermakers Navy Midshipmen Kansas Jayhawks Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets Iowa Hawkeyes Tulsa Golden Hurricane Virginia Cavaliers Nebraska Cornhuskers 8UCF Knights Miami Hurricanes Minnesota Golden Gophers Temple Owls Virginia Tech Hokies Illinois Fighting Illini Cincinnati Bearcats Duke Blue Devils South Florida Bulls North Carolina Tar Heels East Carolina Pirates UConn Huskies Conference USA Big Ten UAB Blazers North Texas Mean Green Toledo Rockets San Diego State Aztecs California Golden Bears Oregon State Beavers Louisiana Tech Bulldogs Western Michigan Broncos UNLV Rebels 17Utah Utes San Jose State Spartans Southern Mississippi Golden Eagles Ball State Cardinals 25Boise State Broncos Arizona State Sun Devils Central Michigan Chippewas UTSA Roadrunners Buffalo Bulls Utah State Aggies USC Trojans UTEP Miners Miami (OH) RedHawks
    [Show full text]