DOCSLIB.ORG

Glen G. Scorgie Phd Thesis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Glen G. Scorgie Phd Thesis 0 20;; 5>@ 2>=B8=C8BD. B74 B74>;>6820; 2>=B@81CB8>= >5 90<4A >@@ 6OIQ 6$ AGRTKMI 0 BLIUMU AWFPMVVIH JRT VLI 3IKTII RJ ?L3 EV VLI CQMXITUMV[ RJ AV$ 0QHTIYU '-,* 5WOO PIVEHEVE JRT VLMU MVIP MU EXEMOEFOI MQ @IUIETGL/AV0QHTIYU.5WOOBIZV EV. LVVS.%%TIUIETGL#TISRUMVRT[$UV#EQHTIYU$EG$WN% ?OIEUI WUI VLMU MHIQVMJMIT VR GMVI RT OMQN VR VLMU MVIP. LVVS.%%LHO$LEQHOI$QIV%'&&()%(+), BLMU MVIP MU STRVIGVIH F[ RTMKMQEO GRS[TMKLV A CALL FOR CONTINUITY: THE THEOLOGICAL CONTRIBUTION OF JAMES ORR a thesis submitted to the Faculty of the University of St. Andrews for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Glen G. Scorgie, B. Th., M. A., M. C. S. March 1986 ABSTRACT James Orr (1844-1913) was a Scottish theologian, apologist and polemicist. He was the leading United Presbyterian theologian at the time of the United Free Church of Scotland union of 1900, and beyond his own church and nation he came to exercise a significant influence in North America. This study is an examination of Orris theological contribution, what he believed and how he expressed it, in its historical setting Particular attention is paid to the convictions which undergirded and gave impetus to his activities. The study reveals that while Orr was far from unaffected by the intellectual movements of the late-Victorian period, his contribution may best be described as a call for continuity with the central tenets of evangelical orthodoxy. He was one of the earliest and principal British critics of the Ritschlian theology, and a strong opponent of rationalistic biblical criticism. He emphatically rejected all evolutionary interpretations of man's moral history, and held firmly to orthodox Christological formulations in the face of alternative assessments of the historical Jesus. While factors of temperament affected the tenor of his work, his contribution was most decisively shaped by the convictions that evangelical orthodoxy is ultimately self-authenticating, that truth comprises a unity or interconnected whole, that genuine Christian belief implies a two-story supernaturalist cosmology, and that the rationalism of the times was a temporary malaise. A general lack of support for his views within the scholarly 2 community, combined with his own deep-seated populist instincts and common sense convictions, led Orr in later years to direct his appeals primarily toward the Christian public. The conclusion reached is that Orr deserves to be recognized, not so much as a brilliant or particularly original thinker, but as an able and exceptionally vigorous participant in a period of dramatic theological challenge and change. BLANK IN ORIGINAL TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ....................... v INTRODUCTION 1 ........................ CHAPTERS I. NINETEENTH CENTURY PROTESTANT THEOLOGY IN BRITAIN AND NORTH AMERICA : 8 Refining Fires ................... II. THE FORMATIVE YEARS: 31 Glaswegian, United Presbyterian, Student ...... III. FROM WESTMINSTER CONFESSION TO "THE CHRISTIAN VIEW": A Theological Position Established 56 ......... IV. ENCOUNTER WITH RITSCHLIANISM: Continuity in Theological Method 83 .......... V. THE CHALLENGE OF BIBLICAL CRITICISM: Continuity in the Interpretation and Doctrine of Scripture 124 ...................... VI. THE EXPANSION OF EVOLUTIONARY THEORY: Continuity in Doctrines Man Sin 158 the of and ..... VII. THE QUEST OF THE HISTORICAL JESUS: Continuity in Christology 184 .............. VIII. POPULARIZING EVANGELICAL ORTHODOXY: An Appeal Public 208 to the ............... CONCLUSION 233 ......................... SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY 251 .................... DECLARATION I was admitted as a research student under Ordinance 350 (General No. 12) on October 1,1981 and as a candidate for the degree of Ph. D. under Resolution of the University Court, 1967, No. 1 (as amended) on February 16,1983, with retrospective effect to October 1,1981. The following thesis is based on the results of research carried out by myself, is my own composition, and has not previously been presented for a higher degree. The research was carried out in the University of St. Andrews under the supervision of Professor James K. Cameron. V 1`. LL V" VVVi Gi`' Candidate 0 CERTIFICATE I certify that Glen G. Scorgie has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution of the University Court, 1967, No. 1 (as amended), and is qualified to submit this thesis in application for the Degree of Doctor of. Philosophy. Professor James K. Cameron, Supervisor 111 THESIS COPYRIGHT DECLARATION FORM UNRESTRICTED In submitting this thesis to the University of St. Andrews I understand that I am giving permission for it to be made available for use in accordance with the regulations of the University Library for the time being in force, subject to any copyright vested in the work not being affected thereby. I also understand that the title and abstract will be published, and that a copy of the work may be made and supplied to any bona fide library or research worker. Glen G. Scorgie 6 IV ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Even the writing of intellectual history involves certain economic realities, and I gratefully acknowledge that this research was made possible through generous financial assistance from the Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals of the Universities of the United Kingdom Cthrough its Overseas Research Students Fee Support Scheme), the University of St. Andrews, the Conoco Oil Company, the Canadian Bible College and the Alta Vista Baptist Church in Burnaby, British Columbia. Research is a fascinating priyilege, but it can also be dif- ficult, and is usually a solitary, and sometimes even a lonely enter- prise. For these latter reasons one deeply appreciates those who share one's interest, and come alongside to help and to encourage. In this vein I thank from the bottom of my heart Ian Rennie, James Packer, Robbie Orr and J. D. Douglas, as well as my colleagues at St. Mary's College and at St. John's House. More than to any other individual, I am indebted to my insightful and patient supervisor, James K. Cameron. I hasten to add the usual disclaimer, though: responsibility for this work and the conclusions to which it has led is entirely my own. I would also like to express thanks to the Master of St. John's House for providing me with study space there; to Carlos Wilton for his inquiries behalf on my at Princeton; to Jack Weir for repeated trips to the British Library in the same interest; to Lindsay Thomson, V vi Hawick, for the loan the minister of Trinity Church, of a valuable Orr, the James Orr, for primary source, and to J. M. grandson of " some intriguing "oral tradition. Librarians and archivists have been invariably cheerful and competent, but I owe a special debt to the staffs of the University of St. Andrews Library, the New College Library and the Glasgow University Archives. Sandy Ayer graciously proof-read the manuscript of this thesis, and Diane Ayer typed this final version. I am grateful to them all. Finally, I thank my wife Kate, who has always shared my enthusiasm for this study, kept the vision alight during the darker moments and willingly shared the sacrifices necessary to bring it to this stage. For these reasons, and countless others, I gladly and affectionately dedicate this thesis to her. vii When I am asked, as I sometimes am, which of these articles of the Evan- gelical faith I am prepared to part with at the instance of modern thought, and in the interests of a re-constructed theology, I answer, with fullest confidence: None of them. James Orr INTRODUCTION James Orr was a Scottish theologian, apologist and polemicist. He was born in Glasgow, educated for the most part in that city's university and was nurtured in the Christian faith in the United Presbyterian Church. For seventeen years he was a minister in the Border town of Hawick. A series of lectures he delivered in 1891 at the United Presbyterian College proved a turning-point in his career. Later published as The Christian View of God and the WorZd, these lectures were widely acclaimed as a valuable contribution to theological and apologetical literature. Orr was immediately appointed to a vacant chair in the United Presbyterian College on the strength of this work. His subsequent academic career was remarkably productive. In the remaining twenty-two years of his life, nine as a United Pres- byterian professor and thirteen at the United Free Church College in Glasgow, Orr wrote sixteen books, edited a denominational magazine for some years, contributed hundreds of articles and reviews to religious periodicals, frequently lectured abroad, and finally, edited a major reference work, The International Standard Bib Ze Encyclopaedia. Orr was the leading United Presbyterian theologian at the time of the United Free Church union, and had an important role in advocating and negotiating that ecclesiastical merger. Beyond his own church and nation, he came to exercise a significant influence in North America. 1 2 dynamic Orr's adult life corresponded to a particularly period in Protestant theology and church life, and within this context he sought to defend and preserve a degree of continuity with the older theology in the face of various challenges, usually of German origin. Orr was one of the earliest and principal British critics of Ritschlian theology, and a vigorous opponent of rationalistic biblical criticism. He was a leading conservative theological force in Scotland in his time, and one of the last major Scottish theologians to defend the traditional theological framework. Orr has received a modest amount of scholarly attention to date, and it has tended to focus on three aspects of his work: his response to Ritschlianism, his general approach to apologetics, and his doctrines of Scripture and revelation. In 1929, Samuel L. Akers included Orr among four British theologians (the others were James Denney, A. E. Garvie and H. R. Mackintosh) whose reactions to Ritsch- lianism he compared and contrasted., More recently, James Richmond has given careful consideration to Orr's criticisms of Ritschl in his Ritschl: A Reappraisal, a work based on Richmond's 1975 Kerr 2 Lectures at Glasgow University.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Edward Caird
    EDWARD CAIRD was born in Greenock on 23 March, 1835, the fifth of seven sons of John Caird, a Greenock engineer who died in 1838, and Janet Roderick Young from Paisley. Caird lived during his early years with his aunt Jane Caird, who was deeply devout and determined to instil religion into Edward. He was educated at Greenock Academy until the age of fifteen when he entered Glasgow University in 1850. He attended classes in the Faculties of Arts and Divinity, but ill health required a change of air, first at St. Andrews, and then Errol in Perthshire where his elder brother John, destined to become Principal of the University of Glasgow, was the parish minister. He went to Dresden in order to become better acquainted with the language and classical literature. He was particularly fond on Goethe, having been influenced by reading Carlyle's poetic and philosophical idealism. In 1858 he resumed his studies in Glasgow and took classes in Divinity, but then changed his direction and translated to Oxford where he became re-acquainted with his former class friend John Nicol who founded the Old Mortality Society whose members included A. V. Dicey and T. H. Green. Caird was the only undergraduate invited to join. He was taught by Jowett at Oxford, and became extremely friendly with T. H. Green, who he regarded as a kindred spirit in politics and attitude towards education as well as in philosophy. Caird graduated in 1863, and became a fellow and tutor of Merton College until his elevation to the chair of moral philosophy at Glasgow in 1866.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Perspective on Paul: Its Basic Tenets, History, and Presuppositions
    TMSJ 16/2 (Fall 2005) 189-243 THE NEW PERSPECTIVE ON PAUL: ITS BASIC TENETS, HISTORY, AND PRESUPPOSITIONS F. David Farnell Associate Professor of New Testament Recent decades have witnessed a change in views of Pauline theology. A growing number of evangelicals have endorsed a view called the New Perspective on Paul (NPP) which significantly departs from the Reformation emphasis on justification by faith alone. The NPP has followed in the path of historical criticism’s rejection of an orthodox view of biblical inspiration, and has adopted an existential view of biblical interpretation. The best-known spokesmen for the NPP are E. P. Sanders, James D. G. Dunn, and N. T. Wright. With only slight differences in their defenses of the NPP, all three have adopted “covenantal nomism,” which essentially gives a role in salvation to works of the law of Moses. A survey of historical elements leading up to the NPP isolates several influences: Jewish opposition to the Jesus of the Gospels and Pauline literature, Luther’s alleged antisemitism, and historical-criticism. The NPP is not actually new; it is simply a simultaneous convergence of a number of old aberrations in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. * * * * * When discussing the rise of the New Perspective on Paul (NPP), few theologians carefully scrutinize its historical and presuppositional antecedents. Many treat it merely as a 20th-century phenomenon; something that is relatively “new” arising within the last thirty or forty years. They erroneously isolate it from its long history of development. The NPP, however, is not new but is the revival of an old ideology that has been around for the many centuries of church history: the revival of works as efficacious for salvation.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Christian Apologetics (1948)
    Christianity has never lacked articulate defenders, but many people today have forgotten their own heritage. Rob Bowman’s book offers readers of all backgrounds an easy point of entry to this deep and vibrant literature. I wish every pastor knew at least this much about the faithful thinkers of past generations! Timothy McGrew Professor of Philosophy, Western Michigan University Director, Library of Historical Apologetics This is a fantastic little book, written by the perfect person to write it. Bowman’s new Faith Thinkers offers a helpful “Who’s Who” of the great Christian apologists of history and is an excellent resource for students of apologetics! James K. Dew President, New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary Finally—an accessible introduction to many of history’s most in- fluential defenders of the Christian faith and their legacy. Always interesting (and often surprising), Robert Bowman’s Faith Thinkers will give a new generation of readers a greater appreciation for the remarkable men who laid the groundwork for today’s apologetics renaissance. Highly recommended. Paul Carden Executive Director, The Centers for Apologetics Research (CFAR) Faith Thinkers 30 Christian Apologists You Should Know Robert M. Bowman Jr. President, Faith Thinkers Inc. CONTENTS Introduction: Two Thousand Years of Faith Thinkers . 9 Part One: Before the Twentieth Century 1. Luke Acts of the Apostles (c. AD 61) . 15 2. Justin Martyr First Apology (157) . .19 3. Origen Against Celsus (248) . .22 4. Augustine The City of God (426) . 25 5. Anselm of Canterbury Proslogion (1078) . .29 6. Thomas Aquinas Summa Contra Gentiles (1263) . .33 7. John Calvin Institutes of the Christian Religion (1536) .
    [Show full text]
  • How Scotland Lost Its Hold of the Bible 1
    How Scotland Lost Its Hold of the Bible 1 Iain H. Murray Man is now thinking out a Bible for himself; framing a religion in harmony with the development of liberal thought; constructing a worship on the principles of taste and culture; shaping a god to suit the expanding aspirations of the age. … The extent of the mis- chief no one can calculate. A soul without faith, a church without faith, a nation without faith, a world without faith – what is to be their future? What is their present? When faith goes, all good things go. When unbelief comes in, all evil things follow. —HORATIUS BONAR.2 here are times when Christians are conscious that a book has T come to them just when it was specially needed. It was so with me one February day in 1954 when, as a student at Durham University, a second-hand book came into my hands with the title A Critical History of Free Thought in Reference to the Christian Religion. The author was Adam S. Farrar and the volume was one of the famous series of Bamp- ton Lectures delivered at Oxford in 1862. The date is significant. It was before the authority of Scripture was discounted in British universities, and Farrar, an evangelical, spent nearly 700 pages reviewing man’s opposition to the word of God across the centuries.3 I was then having my own experience of opposition to the trustwor- thiness of Scripture, and this book showed me that this was no new thing. Attacks on the word of God are as old as the time when the 1 The substance of an address given at the Inerrancy Summit, Grace Commu- nity Church, Los Angeles, March 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • The Authority of Scripture According to Scripture* JAMES D
    The Authority of Scripture According to Scripture* JAMES D. G. DUNN I The issue 1) What is the issue concerning Scripture that seems to be dividing and confusing evangelicals today? It is not, I believe, the question of inspiration as such: of whether and how the Bible was inspired. No evangelical that I know of would wish to deny that the biblical writers were inspired by God in what they wrote, or to dispute the basic assertions of 2 Timothy 3:16 and 2 Peter 1:21. Nor is it, I believe, the question of authority as such: of whether the Bible is authoritative for Christians. All evangelicals are united in affirming that the Bible is the Word of God unto salvation, the constitutional authority for the church's faith and life. Where evangelicals begin to disagree is over the implications and corollaries of these basic affirmations of the Bible's inspiration and authority. When we begin to unpack these basic affirmations, how much more is involved in them? How much more is necessarily involved in them? The disagreement, it is worth noting right away, depends partly on theological considerations (what is the theological logic of affirming the inspiration of Scripture?), and partly on apologetic and pastoral concerns (what cannot we yield concerning the Bible's authority without endangering the whole faith, centre as well as circumference?). In order to maintain these affirmations (inspiration and authority) with consistency of faith and logic, in order to safeguard these affirmations from being undermined or weakened-what more precisely must
    [Show full text]
  • The Significance of Christ's Resurrection." Christiancourier.Com
    The Significance of Christ’s Resurrection By Wayne Jackson Each spring, millions of people around the world acknowledge, in some fashion or another, that Jesus Christ was raised from the dead some twenty centuries ago. Modern society calls it “Easter.” The origin of this term is uncertain, though it is commonly thought to derive from Eastre, the name of a Teutonic spring goddess. The term “Easter,” in the King James Version of the Bible (Acts 12:4), is a mistranslation. The Greek word is pascha, correctly rendered “Passover” in later translations. In fact, though pascha is found twenty-nine times in the Greek New Testament, it is only rendered “Easter” once, even in the KJV. Christians are not authorized to celebrate Easter as a special annual event acknowledging the resurrection of Christ. Faithful children of God reflect upon the Savior’s resurrection every Sunday (the resurrection day – cf. John 20:1ff) as they gather to worship God in the regular assembly of the church (cf. Acts 20:7; 1 Corinthians 16:2). We ought to be glad, however, that multitudes—usually caught up in pursuits wholly materialistic—will take at least some time for reflection upon the event of the Savior’s resurrection. It is entirely appropriate that Christians take advantage of this circumstance; we should be both willing and able to explain to our friends—at least those who have some reverence for Christianity—the significance of the Lord’s resurrection. The resurrection of Jesus from the dead is the foundation of the Christian system (cf. 1 Corinthians 15:14ff).
    [Show full text]
  • Linda Christine Knowles Phd Thesis
    IN SEARCH OF A NATIONAL VOICE : SOME SIMILARITIES BETWEEN SCOTTISH AND CANADIAN POETRY 1860-1930 Linda Christine Knowles A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 1981 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/15190 This item is protected by original copyright In Search of a National Voice: Some Similarities Between Scottish and Canadian Poetry 1860-1930. by Linda Christine Knowles 1981 ProQuest Number: 10167356 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10167356 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 s tv3. This thesis has been composed by me, and the work of which it is a record has been done by myself. It has not been accepted in any previous application for a higher degree. I have carried out research in Canadian and Scottish poetry in the Department of English, University of St Andrews under the supervision of Dr R.P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kingdom of God, the Highest Good Herman Bavinck Translated by Nelson D
    TBR 2 (2011): 133–170 The Kingdom of God, The Highest Good Herman Bavinck Translated by Nelson D. Kloosterman * INTRODUCTION [28] Amid all the distress surrounding the discipline of theology today, it is undoubtedly a heartening phenomenon that the science identified as Ethics seems to be enjoying an unheralded resurgence of interest, compared to former times. This does not mean, of course, that everything in this discipline is flourishing. Not all of the causes to which Ethics is indebted for this resurgence are heartwarming. The way in which people try to dislodge the firm foundations of this discipline, or seek to caricature and deny its eternal principles, is far from encouraging. But that people are curious about the moral life and attempt to clarify its nature, principle, and essence, do provide reasons for rejoicing and gratitude, I think. Formerly, the discipline of Ethics received sparse attention, consisting mostly of explaining the doctrines of virtues and duties. Simply knowing what kind of persons we must be is inadequate, *The following essay is a lecture that Bavinck delivered to the Student Corps of the Theological School in Kampen—Fides Quaerit Intellectum—on 3 February 1881. The lecture was originally serialized in De Vrije Kerk: Vereeniging van Christelijke Gereformeerde Stemmen 7 (April–August 1881): 4:185–92; 5:224– 34; 6:271–77; 7:305–14; 8:353–60. These articles were republished as a single essay in the collection of Bavinck essays prepared by his brother, C.B. Bavinck, Kennis en Leven (Kampen: Kok, 1922), 28–56. The pagination from Kennis en Leven is provided in brackets: [ ].
    [Show full text]
  • Centre for Idealism and the New Liberalism
    Centre for Idealism and the New Liberalism Working Paper Series: Number 2 Bibliography of Edward Caird (1835-1908) (2018 version) Compiled by Professor Colin Tyler Centre for Idealism and the New Liberalism University of Hull Every Working Paper is peer reviewed prior to acceptance. Authors & compilers retain copyright in their own Working Papers. For further information on the Centre for Idealism and the New Liberalism, and its activities, visit our website: http://www.hull.ac.uk/pas/ Or, contact the Centre Directors Colin Tyler: [email protected] James Connelly [email protected] Centre for Idealism and the New Liberalism School of Law and Politics University of Hull, Cottingham Road Hull, HU6 7RX, United Kingdom Table of Contents Acknowledgements I. Writings II. Reviews III. Obituaries and memorials IV. Other discussions V. Additions since the 2011 version 2 Acknowledgments for the 2018 version Yet again, I am very pleased to thank scholars who sent in references, and hope they will not mind my not mentioning them individually. All future references will be received with thanks. Professor Colin Tyler University of Hull December 2017 Acknowledgments for the original, 2004 version The work on this bibliography was supported by a Resource Enhancement Award (B/RE/AN3141/APN17357) from the Arts and Humanities Research Board. ‘The Arts and Humanities Research Board (AHRB) funds postgraduate and advanced research within the UK’s higher education institutions and provides funding for museums, galleries and collections that are based in, or attached to, HEIs within England. The AHRB supports research within a huge subject domain - from ‘traditional’ humanities subjects, such as history, modern languages and English literature, to music and the creative and performing arts.’ I have also profited enormously from having access to the Brynmor Jones Library at the University of Hull, a resource which benefits from an excellent stock of written and electronic sources, as well as extremely helpful and friendly librarians.
    [Show full text]
  • The Supremacy of God in Preaching – Part 5
    The Supremacy of God in Preaching – Part 5 2 TIMOTHY 3:16-2 TIMOTHY 4:2 TEXT, EXPOSITION AND PRACTICAL HELPS West Los Angeles Living Word Christian Center Centro Cristiano Palabra Viva Dr. Eddie Ildefonso, Senior Pastor 6520 Arizona Ave. Los Ángeles, CA 90045 Email: [email protected] Website: WWW.WLALWCC.ORG Phillips Brooks From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search For other persons named Phillip Brooks, see Phil Brooks. Phillips Brooks. Anglicanism portal Phillips Brooks (December 13, 1835 – January 23, 1893) was a noted American clergyman and author, who briefly served as Bishop of Massachusetts in the Episcopal Church during the early 1890s. In the Episcopalian liturgical calendar he is remembered on January 23. 156 Contents [hide] • 1 Background o 1.1 Early life and education o 1.2 Pastoral career • 2 Influence and Legacy o 2.1 Publications o 2.2 Awards and Historical Monuments • 3 External links • 4 References [edit] Background [edit] Early life and education Brooks was born in Boston, Massachusetts in 1835. Through his father, William Gray Brooks, he was descended from the Rev. John Cotton; through his mother, Mary Ann Phillips, a very devout woman, he was a great-grandson of Samuel Phillips, Jr., the founder of Phillips Academy, Andover, Massachusetts. Four of the couple's six sons -- Phillips, Frederic, Arthur and John Cotton -- were ordained in the Episcopal Church. Phillips Brooks prepared for college at the Boston Latin School and graduated from Harvard University in 1855 at the age of 20, where he was elected to the A.D. Club. After a brief period as a teacher at Boston Latin , he began in 1856 to study for ordination in the Episcopal Church in the Virginia Theological Seminary at Alexandria, Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Who, Where and When: the History & Constitution of the University of Glasgow
    Who, Where and When: The History & Constitution of the University of Glasgow Compiled by Michael Moss, Moira Rankin and Lesley Richmond © University of Glasgow, Michael Moss, Moira Rankin and Lesley Richmond, 2001 Published by University of Glasgow, G12 8QQ Typeset by Media Services, University of Glasgow Printed by 21 Colour, Queenslie Industrial Estate, Glasgow, G33 4DB CIP Data for this book is available from the British Library ISBN: 0 85261 734 8 All rights reserved. Contents Introduction 7 A Brief History 9 The University of Glasgow 9 Predecessor Institutions 12 Anderson’s College of Medicine 12 Glasgow Dental Hospital and School 13 Glasgow Veterinary College 13 Queen Margaret College 14 Royal Scottish Academy of Music and Drama 15 St Andrew’s College of Education 16 St Mungo’s College of Medicine 16 Trinity College 17 The Constitution 19 The Papal Bull 19 The Coat of Arms 22 Management 25 Chancellor 25 Rector 26 Principal and Vice-Chancellor 29 Vice-Principals 31 Dean of Faculties 32 University Court 34 Senatus Academicus 35 Management Group 37 General Council 38 Students’ Representative Council 40 Faculties 43 Arts 43 Biomedical and Life Sciences 44 Computing Science, Mathematics and Statistics 45 Divinity 45 Education 46 Engineering 47 Law and Financial Studies 48 Medicine 49 Physical Sciences 51 Science (1893-2000) 51 Social Sciences 52 Veterinary Medicine 53 History and Constitution Administration 55 Archive Services 55 Bedellus 57 Chaplaincies 58 Hunterian Museum and Art Gallery 60 Library 66 Registry 69 Affiliated Institutions
    [Show full text]
  • Lord Gifford and His Lectures: the Irsf T Year (1888-1889) Eugene Thomas Long
    Studies in Scottish Literature Volume 23 | Issue 1 Article 4 1988 Lord Gifford and his Lectures: The irsF t Year (1888-1889) Eugene Thomas Long Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/ssl Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Long, Eugene Thomas (1988) "Lord Gifford and his Lectures: The irF st Year (1888-1889)," Studies in Scottish Literature: Vol. 23: Iss. 1. Available at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/ssl/vol23/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you by the Scottish Literature Collections at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Studies in Scottish Literature by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Eugene Thomas Long Lord Gifford and his Lectures: The First Year (1888-1889) During the academic session, 1888-1889, the first Gifford Lectures in natural theology were delivered at three of the then four Scottish Universities, Edinburgh, Glasgow and Saint Andrews. During the following year the first Aberdeen lectures were given. Now one hundred years and more than 150 lecturers later, the Gifford Lectures are recognized by many as the most distinguished lecture series in the world. Lecturers have come from many different fields as the names James Frazer, Werner Heisenberg, Arnold Toynbee, Albert Schv,pitzer, Josiah Royce and Rudolf Bultmann suggest and most of the lectures have been published. Some of the published versions of the lectures such as William James' The Varieties 0/ Religious Experience and Alfred North Whitehead's Process and Reality have become classics in the field of natural theology.
    [Show full text]