BLUMEA 47 (2002) 363-383

Seed morphology of some tribes of

(implications for and species

identification for the flora of Egypt)

K.+Abdel Khalik & L.J.G. van der Maesen

Summary

of 23 of Brassicaceae examined Seed morphology 45 taxa belonging to genera were using light and scanning electron microscopy. The taxa included representatives of the tribes Arabideae,Euclidi-

eae, Hesperideae,Lunarieae,Matthioleae, and Sisymbrieae, which all occur in Egypt. Macro- and

micromorphological characters, including seed shape, colour, size, the position of the radicle relative

to the cotyledons, epidermal cell shape, anticlinal boundaries, outer periclinal cell wall and relief

of outer cell walls, are presented. Three types ofbasic anticlinal cell wall boundaries are recognised

and six different shapes of the outer periclinal cell wall are described. A key for the identification

of the investigated taxa based on seed characters is provided.

Key words '. Brassicaceae, SEM, seed coat.

Introduction

The Brassicaceae (Cruciferae) are one ofthe largest angiosperm families, comprising

approximately 340 genera and more than 3350 species in 10 poorly defined tribes,

distributed throughout the world, chiefly in temperate regions of the northern hemi-

sphere (Al-Shehbaz, 1984). The major centres of distributionofthe family are in the

Irano-Turanian, Mediterranean, and Saharo-Sindianregions (Hedge, 1976).

In the flora ofEgypt, Brassicaceae are one of the four largest families, repre-

sented by about 102 species belonging to 55 genera,assigned to 9tribes (Schulz, 1936).

Species of the tribes Lepideae, Brassiceae, and Alysseae (63 species belonging to 32

genera) have been the subject of an earlier study (El Naggar, 1987; El Naggar & El

Hadidi, 1998). The remaining Brassicaceae, belonging to the tribesArabideae, Eucli-

deae,Hesperideae, Lunarieae,Matthioleae,and Sisymbrieae (Schulz, 1936) (39 species

in 23 genera) exhibit great diversity, as shown in this revision. The membersof these

tribes distributed wide of habitats of farmland and are over a range as weeds waste

places, desert land, Mediterraneancoastal land, oases; mountains of Sinai and Elba,

as well as inland flats and canal banks.

that data the and microstructure of Most systematists agree concerning macro-

seeds are very significant for the classification of angiosperm taxa. Heywood (1971)

drewattention to the importance and impact of scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

in the study of systematic problems, as very valuable informationhas been provided

1) South Valley University, Faculty of Science, Botany Department, Sohag, Egypt.

2) Nationaal Herbarium Nederland, Wageningen University branch, Biosystematics Group,

Generaal Foulkesweg 37, 6703 BL Wageningen,The Netherlands. 364 BLUMEA Vol. 47, No. 2, 2002

this the last decades, scholars have SEM to by using technique. During many applied morphological studies of seeds and small fruits. Micromorphology and ultrastructural

data have contributed useful informationfor evolutionand classification ofseed

and play an important role in the modern synthetic systems of angiosperms (Dahlgren,

1979-1980).

Most studies focused on intrageneric seed coat variation(Chuang & Heckard, 1972;

Hill, 1976; Heyn & Herrnstadt, 1977; Clark & Jernstedt, 1978;Newell & Hymowitz,

1978; Canne, 1979; Crow, 1979; Wofford, 1981; Juan et al., 2000; Segarra & Mateu,

2001) or on variation among several closely related genera(Musselman & Mann, 1976;

Seaveyetal., 1977;Canne, 1980; Chance & Bacon, 1984; Matthews& Levins, 1986;

Fayed & El Naggar, 1988,1996;Haridasan & Mukherjee, 1993; Shanmukha & Leela,

1993; Kanak Sahai et al., 1997; Karam, 1997; Koul et al., 2000). Less commonly,

SEM level variation was used to place taxa into tribes (Whiffin & Tomb, 1972).

For furtherinformationand references concerning seed forms and internal structures

see Corner (1976). Seed appendages were studied by Kapil et al. (1980); for seed size

and number see Aniszewski et al. (2001); for the colours of seeds refer to Berggren,

1962; Huber, 1969; Dahlgren & Clifford, 1982; Barthlott, 1984; while epidermal cell

patterns and distributionofelements such as trichomes, glands, and stomata are given

by Stace (1965). The distributionofepidermal cells is of importance between species

and genus level (Barthlott, 1981, 1984; Haridasan & Mukherjee, 1993); while outer

periclinal walls are also a good diagnostic character for the lowesttaxonomic categories

(Barthlott, 1981, 1984; Fayed & El Naggar, 1988, 1996).

In Brassicaceae, the external features of the seeds colour and shape are studied by

Kondo (1917), McGugan (1948), Musil (1948), and Murley (1951). Berggren (1962)

investigated the external morphology and anatomy ofseeds testa ofBrassica. Vaughan

& Whitehouse (1971) studied the external morphology and anatomy of seeds of 90

generaand 200 species of the Cruciferae and paid special attentionto the relationships between seed structure and the existing taxonomy. Prasad (1976) investigated the

seed coat structure and development in certain species of Brassicaceae. Mulligan &

Baily (1976) and Stork et al. (1980) studied some taxa of Brassica seeds with SEM

reclassification of and they suggested other data that help in the the genus. Fayed &

El Naggar (1988) investigated the seed coat sculpture in species of the tribe Brassiceae

in Egypt by using SEM; several details offered taxonomic value at the generic and

subtribal such the seed and cells anticlinal levels, as shape size, epidermal pattern,

wall boundaries, and outer periclinal cell walls. Jonsell (1975) studied the seed coat of Lepidium in East tropical Africa; Fayed & El Naggar (1996) investigated the seed

morphology and taxonomy with SEM in the tribe Lepidieae in Egypt.

Jonsell (1986) studied the seed coat of genusFarsetia by using SEM to distinguish between species. Stork (1971, 1972) and Stork & Wiiest (1978) investigated the seed

coats and development of epidermal slime bodies ofMalcolmiaand foundlarge differ-

ences between the species. Jonsell(1979) used SEM on the seed surface to distinguish

Matthiola, Morettia, and Diceratella. Stork & Wiiest (1980) studied the seed coat

morphology, particularly the epidermal slime structure ofMorettia.Koul et al. (2000)

investigated the seed coat microsculpturing in Brassica and alliedgeneraand provided evidence for the close relationships among various generawithin subtribe Brassicinae and of subtribes Raphaninae and Moricandiinaewith the Brassicinae. K. Abdel Khalik & L.J.G. van der Maesen: Seed morphology of Brassicaceae tribes 365

The deal with the and & present investigations macro- micromorphological (LM

SEM) characters ofseeds of23 genera(39 species) of6 tribes from thefamily Brassica-

for ceae in Egypt, to decideon the importance of seed characters as a criterion sepa-

in this The used here follows authors rating genera and species family. terminology

such as Barthlott (1981, 1984), Fayed & El Naggar (1988, 1996), Karam (1997), and

Koul et al. (2000) with some modifications by the author.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Some of the investigated seeds were collected from mature plants in Egypt during

1998-2000.The otherswere supplied by INIA, Madrid, Spain or taken from herbarium

specimens (see Table 1).

Only mature seeds were taken for investigation. The dried seeds were first examined

by light microscope (Carl Zeiss 475002), and 7-15 seeds for each taxon were chosen

stubs with double adhesive to cover the range of variation. Seeds were mounted on

with for 2-3 min. in Polaron tape. The stubs were sputter-coated gold-palladium a

Equipment Ltd. SEM coating unit E 5100.After coating, the specimens were examined

•with a Jeol JSM 5200 scanning electron microscope, using accelerating voltages at

of Plant and 15-20 KV. All photomicrographs were taken at the department Cytology

Morphology, SEM laboratory, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.

RESULTS

Seed characters are very important to separate among genera and species levels in

Brassicaceae. Seed shape varies fromorbicular, suborbicular, oblong, ovoid, to oblong-

ovoid. Seed size varies from large 3-8 by 2.5-7 mm to small 0.5-1 by 0.3-0.9 mm

and helps to separate between species. Seed colour varies from brown, yellow-brownish

to red-brownish. Radicle position relative to cotyledons varies from accumbent to

incumbent. Epidermal cell shape varies from isodiametric, 4-5-6-polygonal to elongate

in one direction. Anticlinal boundaries vary from raised to channelledand anticlinal

sinuous and the surface varies from smooth walls from straight to or slightly sinuous;

fine folds. Periclinal cell walls showed variation to or coarse a large among genera

and species level, and can either be flat, concave, convex, or domate; smooth, micro-

or macroreticulate, striate, and possess fine to coarse folds and papillae.

of radicle relative The seed shape, absence/presence a wing, size, colour, position

to the cotyledons, epidermal cell shape, and the characters of anticlinal boundaries

and periclinal cell walls of each taxon (39 species belong to 23 genera) are given in

Table2.

DISCUSSION OF SEED CHARACTERS

1. SEED SHAPE

variation. of The shape of seeds among the investigated taxa showed a large Most

the seeds vary from oblong or ovoid to oblong-ovoid or oblong-ellipsoidal (Table 2),

however, they are orbicular in Ricotia lunaria (Fig. 11); sub-orbicularto sub-orbicular-

ovoid in Matthiolalongipetala subsp. hirta, Arabis alpina subsp. caucasica, Neslia 366 BLUMEA Vol. 47, No. 2, 2002

Table 1. List of Brassicaceae seed specimens used in Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) studies.

taxon collection no.n

1.1. Tribe Arabideae

Arabis alpina L. subsp.subsp. 1313 Morocco, Taza,Taza, around gebel Tazzeka (NMGM)

caucasica (Willd.)Briq.

Switzerland,Valois, Val de Arabis nova Vill. 20273 Switzerland,Valois, Val de Bagnes (BR)

Nasturtium officinaleofficinale R.Br.R. Br. 415

Rorippa indica (L.) Hiern s.n. Egypt, Qena, El Mahrosa islandisland (SHG)

Rorippa integrifolia Boulos 9 Egypt, Middle of Sinai, aboutabout 5 km beforebefore Ras

Sedr (SHG)

Rorippa palustris (L.)(L.) Besser 20 Egypt, along the canal of Ismailiya (SHG)

2. Tribe Euclidieae

Anastatica hierochunticahierochuntica L. 327 Egypt, Cairo-Suez road, 95 kmkm fromfrom Cairo (CAI)

Neslia paniculatapaniculata (L.) Desv. 64 Iran,Iran,nearnear Gere between Abushir andand Shiraz

(WAG)

Ochthodium aegyptiacum (L.)(L.) DC. 129 Palestine, Jerusalem: Mt. Scopus (BM)

Schimpera arabica Hochst. & Steud.Steud . 3747-75 Spain, Madrid (INIA)

3. Tribe Hesperideae

Eremobium aegyptiacum (Spreng.) 29 Egypt, El Arish areaarea beside thethe airport, N Sinai

Asch. & Schweinf. subsp. (SHG)

aegyptiacumaegyptiacum

Eremobium aegyptiacum subsp. s.n. Egypt, El Tor desert, SinaiSinai (L)(L)

linearelineare (Delile) Abdel Khalik

in near (LY) Eremobium aegyptiacum subsp. s.n. Egypt, in sandssands Asswan

longisiliquumlongisiliquum (Coss.)(Coss.) Maire

Erysimum repandum L. 1163-67 Spain, Madrid (INIA)

LeptaleumLeptaleumfllifoliumfilifolium (Willd.) DC. s.n. Egypt, Wadi Chafura, north Galala (BR)

Malcolmia africanaafricana (L.) R.Br. 2 Egypt, Deir el Rahba, Wadi el Arbain, SS Sinai

(SHG)

Malcolmia Boiss. 28 El Arish-Rafah road, 23 km fromfrom El Arish Malcolmia nana (DC.) Boiss. 28 Egypt, El road, 23 km

(SHG)

Malcolmia Boiss. 22 Alexandria-Matruh coastal 26 pygmaea (Delile) Egypt, road, km,

Sidi Krer, (SHG)

4. TribeTribe Lunarieae

Ricotia lunaria (L.) DC. 45,00445,004 Syria, Golan, Yahudiya forest (B)

5. TribeTribe Matthioleae

Diceratella elliptica (DC.)(DC.) JonsellJonsell 17 Egypt, Gebel Elba, Wadi el ShallalShallal (SHG)(SHG)

Matthiola arabica Boiss.Boiss. 12 Egypt, Wadi el Arbaien, S. Sinai (SHG)

Matthiola fruticulosa (L.) Maire 1221-66 Spain, Madrid (INIA)

Matthiola longipetala (Vent.) DC. 43794379 Turkey, Tassia, inin sandssands near Saban Dagi (BR)(BR)

subsp. bicornisbicomis (Sibth.)(Sibth.) Ball

Matthiola longipetala subsp. 2323 Egypt, Alexandria-Matruh coastal road, near Burg

hirtahirta (Conti) Greuter & Burdet elel Arab (SHG)

Matthiola longipetala subsp. 77 Egypt, Cairo-Alexandria desertroad,road, 100 km fromfrom

kralikiikralikii (Pomel) Maire Alexandria (SHG)

Matthiola longipetala subsp. 27 Egypt, Cairo-Ismailiya desert road,road, 23 km before

lividalivida (Delile) Maire IsmailiyaIsmailiya (SHG)(SHG) K. Abdel Khalik & L.J.G. van der Maesen: Seed morphology of Brassicaceae tribes 367

Table 1 (continued)

taxon collection no. place of collections

Matthiola longipetala subsp. 25 Egypt, 2828 km before Matruh, Alexandria-Matruh

longipetala(Vent.)(Vent.) Boulos road (SHG)

Matthiola parviflora (Schousb.) 0907-66 Spain, Madrid (INIA)

R.Br.

Morettia canescensBoiss. 1098-67 Spain, Madrid (INIA)

Morettia parviflora Boiss. 16984/216984/2 SaudiSaudi Arabia, Wadi Harjab, rocky hillsideshillsides (BR)

3 Morettia philaeana (Delile)(Delile) DC. 3 Egypt, 35 km from Qenaonon the road Qena-Safaga

(SHG)

Notoceras bicorne (Aiton) CaruelCamel 1052 Egypt, Gebel Elba, Saddle between Gebel

Asotriba and Makin (CAI)

6. Tribe Sisymbrieae

Crucihimalaya kneuckeri (Bornm.) 49785 Egypt, Sinai, E slopesslopes of Gebel Catherine (CAI)

Al-Shehbaz, O'Kane & R.A. Price

Descurainia Webb & 1475 sophiaSophia (L.)(L.) Jordan, El-Jubeiha, University campus (B)

Berthold

Nasturtiopsis coronopifoliacoronopifolia (Desf.) 3663-76 Spain, Madrid (INIA)(INIA)

Boiss.Boiss.

Neotorularia aculeolata (Boiss.) 5801 Iran, West of Jaz Murian (BR)

Hedge & J. Leonard

Neotorularia torulosa (Desf.) 1461-681461-68 Spain, Madrid (INIA)

Hedge & J. Leonard

Olimarabidopsis pumilapumila (Stephan) 779 Syria, nearDamascus, roadroad of Zahroub toMerdj,

Al-Shehbaz,O'Kane & R.A. PricePrice Baustam el Mahar (L)

Robeschia schimperi (Boiss.)(Boiss.) 170170 Egypt, Sinai Mts, between graniticgranitic rocks (B)(B)

O.E. Schulz

Sisymbrium erysimoides Desf. 1919 Egypt, Gebel Elba, Wadi Drawina (SHG)

Sisymbrium irio L.L. 31 Egypt, S Sinai, Deir el-Rahebat, Wadi Feiran, as

weed in garden (SHG)

Sisymbrium orientale L.L. II11 Egypt, S Sinai, Deir Feiran, Wadi Feiran (SHG)

Sisymbrium polyceratum L.L. 6627-846627-84 Spain, Madrid (INIA)

Sisymbrium runcinatum Lag. ex DC. s.n.s.n. Algeria, El Kantara, near Constantine (BR)

Sisymbrium septulatum DC. 3719-753719-75 Spain, Madrid (INIA)

paniculata, Eremobium aegyptiacum subsp. lineareand Diceratella elliptica (Fig. 1,

7, Seed was found useful the allied Matthiola 12). shape to separate closely genera with oblong seeds; Morettia with ovoid seeds and Diceratella with suborbicular to elliptical and these results congruence with the results of Jonsell (1979). The shape of seeds showed a significant difference between the subspecies of Eremobium

in and aegyptiacum: they are oblong subsp. aegyptiacum subsp. longisiliquum and sub-orbicular to ovoid in subsp. lineare (Fig. 7, 8).

Most of the seeds examined have no wings or only narrow wings, but in Arabis alpina subsp. caucasica, Eremobiumaegyptiacum subsp. lineare, Matthiolafruticulosa and Matthiolalongipetala subsp. hirta seeds have a broad wing (Fig. 1, 7).

continued (text on page 376) 368 BLUMEA Vol. 47, No. 2, 2002

fine to toto striatestriate loto micro- micro-micro- to central toto loto concaveconcave central slightly mediummedium folds papilla; folds toto smooth oror smoothsmooth convex; smooth concave; convex; smooth smoothsmooth wall globularglobular with concave; flat radiate-striate fine cell position; central smoothsmooth with withwith macro-reticulate concave; slightlyslightly concave;concave; convex to slightly slightly convex;convex; convex; concave;concave; macro-reticulate micro-reticulate micro-reticulatemicro-reticulate convex micro-papillate folds micro-reticulate or to to to smooth toto to to toto smooth to reticulatereticulate reticulate to periclinal central smooth papilla; sunken smooth foldsfolds folds fine periclinal domate domatedomate flat; flatflat flat flat flat concave; flat flatflat flat flat flat

fine fine to fine fine to smooth sinuous; straightstraight sinuous; slightlyslightly to slightlyslightly to slightly to toto slightly to folded to to to folds sinuous; foldsfolds straight; straight;straight; toto to to to smoothsmooth to straightstraight straight; fine finefine slightly boundaries sinuous; smooth folds smooth smooth raised-channelled, smooth smooth straightstraight folds straight; straightstraight straightstraight straight to raised, toto to raised, raised,raised, straight folds foldsfolds sinuous;sinuous; folds slightly coarse sinuous;sinuous; medium sinuous;sinuous; sinuous; smooth raised-channelled,raised-channelled, smoothsmooth straight sinuous; smooth smooth sinuous; coarse fine finefine fine foldsfolds foldsfolds anticlinal channelled, raised,raised, raised,raised, raised,raised, raised,raised, raised, channelled, to slightly slightlyslightly slightly slightlyslightly raised,

in shape elongateelongate direc- polygonal 5-6-poly-5-6-poly- elongate polygonalpolygonal 4-5-gonal direc- 4-5-6- 5-6-gonal,5-6-gonal, polygonalpolygonal elongate one cell one directiondirection directiondirection in in polygonalpolygonal direction one one elongate Brassicaceae. epidermal gonal inin tion, one gonal tion epidermal tion, tion in 4-5-polygonal, 4-5-6-gonal, 4-5-polygonal, 5-6-gonal, one isodiametric, isodiametric,isodiametric, in isodiametric,isodiametric, isodiametric, isodiametric 4-polygonal4-polygonal elongateelongate 5-6-gonal, isodiametric, isodiametric,isodiametric, isodiametric, of accumbent accumbentaccumbent accumbent accumbentaccumbent accumbentaccumbent accumbent accumbent incumbentincumbent incumbent incumbent accumbent accumbentaccumbent accumbentaccumbent descriptions radicle

Seed colour brown brownbrown 2. orange-brownorange-brown yellow-brownish red-brownishred-brownish seed light lightlight brown red-brownivcl-hnmn brown brown brownbrown brownbrown brown brownbrown Table (mm)(mm) 1.2-1.3 0.3-0.6 0.3-0.4 0.75-0.9 0.7-0.80.7-0.8 0.5-0.750.5-0.75 1-1.7 1.5-1.7 size xx x x x 1.3 1.2 1.6 x 1 seed 1.3-1.5x1.3-1.5x1.2-1.3 0.7-1x0.3-0.4 l-1.9x1-1.9x1-1.7 1.5x1.3x 2.5-3x1.5-1.7 1.2-2.7x0.5-1.2 xx 2.1x1.6x x 0.7-1 0.9-1 0.8-10.8-1 0.8-10.8-1 0.5-0.9 1.5 2.5-3x 2.2 2.1 2.12.1

wing wide none narrow narrow none nonenone nonenone none none none narrownarrow widewide narrow seed

toto ellipsoidellipsoid loto sub-sub- shape tolo toto sub-orbicular oblong-ovoidoblong-ovoid cordiform ovoidovoid orbicularorbicular ovoid-oblongovoid-oblong oblong-ovoid sub-orbicularsub-orbicular ovoid seed ovoid ovoid ovoidovoid ovoid ovoidovoid oblongoblong oblongoblong aegyptia-aegyptia- officinaleofficinale arabica Hesperideae aegyptia- aegyptia- lineare aegyptia- longi-longi- ArabideaeArabideae caucasicacaucasica indica integrifoliaintegrifolia palustrispalustris Euclidieae paniculatapaniculata alpina novanova hierochuntica subsp.subsp. subsp.subsp. subsp.subsp. taxontaxon TribeTribe subsp. Tribe hierochuntica aegyptiacumaegyptiacum Tribe siliquum Arabis subsp. Arabis NasturtiumNasturtium Rorippa RorippaRorippa RorippaRorippa Anastatica NesliaNeslia OchthodiumOchthodium Schimpera Eremobium cum cum EremobiumEremobium cum EremobiumEremobium cum 1. 2. 3. K. Abdel Khalik & L.J.G. van der Maesen: Seed morphology of Brassicaceae tribes 369

1) i to3 X X rt E — p Z 3 3 y -3 5 z a to2 3 c folds micro- c fine coarse a 3 central 1 folds •x smoothE smoothE 0 --J u Sxj medium w central * 4, u fi E « to c o u 4i ■g concavec 3 k > > « -3 sunken3 0 3 s ,zfolds striateE flat to 0 id fine a 3 3 3 coarseC 3 smooth 'J > u u 3 •J I or ■5 Si 3 3 3 3 3 toQ 3 3 -O 3 striate striate concave;O c concave;0 concave;O V convex; convex; fine wall C smooth fine p X C '4= O 0 O 5 with1 to 1 with X globular flat XJ 00. ■ u Q tog xT* C radiate-striate 3 — "C S 'a. fi -3 ■a Z X x 4) cell5 3 fine u X position; 43 papilla; X xs > > X "a, > smooth — folds"e foldsc folds smooth£ a "J 50 51j 5/J eo a "a with with 3 3 C ifi z 3 z 3 P P convex;Z slightly1_ slightly slightly slightly z slightly convex convex - convex; convex; c a convex;C _3 folds ij *" *3 7^ Z o 8*S u g 1« u u 'J 3 p « --> — M smoothE V 3 fine fine _ o 1 u C- 3 '& a 0 a micropapillate jf3 3 tog to to2 Sto tog to3 s to to or or to 3 - papillate papilla; 0) portion;p 0 3 E § central central striate coarse — fine 3 to to folds E 3 o 3 u 3 3 periclinal 5 — 3 3 n —■ convex;c convex;3 domate domate - flat flat flat flat flat- flat flat flat flat flat flat; flat a "3 -3 zz 53 c C3 o € c c 53 € C u

c X to BS >> u >. u toO 0 >. 5J 3 3 — a c t3 c c X X O X X 3 fine fine fine fine 5fl xa u= -5 J= '4= X3 (3 xt« X 3 c 3 s tog o tog to o c c 5 smooth bJj-o H ~ 00 50 sinuous;3 sinuous; 0 to c c c slightly slightly S slightly to O to to '5 '3 c J= £ C3 s s 3 folds _e folds smooth 3 smoothE smooth smoothE E X X straight; fine smooth| JH straight; Si 1 straight X o a o c £ to to to— to to B 3 O u oj *- 0 0 c z 3 — 3 — 0 z c 3 '5 E sinuous straight — r. X -3 J3 ■d fine X! W3 x w fine X J= ■d X X 4= x c boundaries '1 E E £ ■q £ 5 S smooth smooth Q smooth so-a -a smooth u smooth 60~0 5JJ straight; 5lj 50 50 60 9 51j op C '" 2 to "O . 'S3 '3 c '3 c '3 to '3 a p r1 '§ raised, » folds folds raised, raised, folds ■3 rt straight; c« straight; straight; straight; d straight; — 2 straight;jj — straight straight J3 x £ s _c jg 3 3 foldsc o 4> _= >> 0 0 >^ 0 -^ . . . V. ,/i Q 0 t« 0 a) 0 3 P P Tj X — ~ ~ ■d O T3 3 TD 3 ■a fine 1 fine ■O C "3 ■d 3 ■0 3 d 3T-J a 3 ■d 5 3 •OCEJ X ■Q a 51 o O sinuous;3 3 sinuous;3 '_! u u '-J 4) sinuous; sinuous;3 sinuous; B smooth smooth ~ smooth _C E coarse slightly folds folds folds0 § ll.ffolds smooth fine | 5b | to2 tog 7 0 ,g 2 g .60 "~ .- anticlinal - channelled, channelled, E 'a "3 raised, raised, slightly slightly slightly BJ raised, raised, raised, raised, raised,r^ raised,'3 raised, raised,",3 raised,"c3 3 t« A H "5j " u «> u ™ u

u u u 15 13 "3 "3 ■« « "3 B*. u 3 3 3 O >, 3 one 3 a 3 one0 one 3 3 c 0 c Z 0 0 g 3 X n c bo 0 3 60 00 90 3 3 1b direc- 5, 50 l in in "(J in ■3 00 5h shape 3 x: >. >, W*i 3 Ifl (A X n "S3 -r 60 00 60 "3 cell3 d . 3 = ■J 3 ■J -J U o ■J o u 8 in u a 5 u Z 5 .2 3 direction direction, "a elongate 'C 3 'l_ elongate elongate— 'd c 5ij 5 ~ O — V J -j « u o 0 c S*i e 5^ ~3 Ti 5 00 u ti u u 0 V o ttl y x 3 —' : E £ .*(. z E "3 E i-i >i3 3 £ E E l-a £ "3 £ 3 E § U 3 1 3 3 3 - - one 3 3 3 one n 3 3 £ 3 3 3 3 3 3 g .3 P .2 s 4-5-6-gonal 0 — direction direction '~a D -3 •a o 3 C ■a -3 direction— gonal, -6 elongate epidermal gonal,0 gonal, >r> tion3 gonal gonalp_ gonal 3 — M^3 60 50 in -r B in isodiametric, - isodiametric,S isodiametric, isodiametric, 4-5-polygonal isodiametric,S isodiametric, isodiametric, isodiametric,3 isodiametric,3 isodiametric,z 60T3 isodiametric,■ isodiametric, isodiametric,O 4-5-6-gonal, "-J 0 O Z polygonal p OJ 0 p .i C .i£ -T .2 ■* .2 .—

w w _ „ „ „ _ — 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 c ca 3 3 u u X X Jo X. "u e E E E E E E E E E E E 3 3 E £ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 '■3 3 3 3 3 u 0 0 0 O O 0 incumbent incumbent incumbent incumbent incumbent accumbentO accumbent accumbentu accumbent accumbent accumbent accumbent accumbent accumbent accumbent accumbent•j radiclew O u O 0 ■-< o u u u Q 3 3 3 3 3 u « 3

x XI -3 X3 X X X

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 S s * =: 3 3 " 3 3 3 C C p P O is -C X X X colour"o x X 0 "T brown brownP X - i is 3 X £ s 3 S s 3 3 3 3 s p _c _c _C _c _c j= yellow-brownish yellow-brownish yellow-brownish X yellow-brownish yellow-brownish yellow-brownish yellow-brownish 0 z c p p p seed r;fj Ti ti 5ij u brown u flj brown light brown brown brown brown brown light >-, >* js >. s J5 X X X >> >. X >, X — ~

wi 00 _ X d © d *x E d d — — 00 00 — ri I I - d d d - (mm) -1- in (*) »n § r- 0.4-0.5 0.3-0.4 0.5-0.6 7 0.7-0.8 1-1.2 | d d rp d d d 00 d O' r- -r r-» — Ps w 0.9-1.1 0.7-0.8 0.4-0.6 0.7-0.8 N 0.8-1 Xx Xx »n d x d O x Xx xx d d d Xx size j^ r i r- oo (N 00 x 3C x X Xx X U"J X d f-; x (*} x x x

d — d d X — — — (S m — — m **! i 4» OO 1 1.2-1.7x0.5-0.8 1.5-1.8x0.7-1 - - 1-1.3x0.9-1.1 seed 3-8x2.5-7 J. 49 X (S nC (S >T) 00 11.6x0.7 0.6-0.7 0.6-0.8 0.7-0.8 1 71-1.1 1.1-1.3 2.2x1.2 1-1.3 1-1.1 0.8-1 1-1.2 1.2-1.5 T — d — d d m — — (S — — d — —

00 is i S S = ? c z 0 z 0 u u u p wing t 3 3 c 3 3 3 ■3 -a E t E 1 c 3 z 3 O C 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 none none none none none none narrow3 narrow "iwide '5wide narrow narrow narrow narrow narrow none S ■a c 3 3 C 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

seed9 13 tog "z T) •a -z "3 SI 3 z O ai '3 .9- 'z a. > > 0 s u .a o z p Z _3 Xj X shapeXS "JS ill 00 00 00 M 6J) 60 &0 M 50 U) V] 3 a — 3 3 0 3 3 a 33 3 3 3 3 3 w ■a o c 0 oblong-ellipsoidalZ 'c elliptic o 0 0 0 C z C '3 oblong-ovoid x. sub-orbicular U sub-orbicular oblong-ovoid oblong-ovoid oblong-ovoid £ -C JZ orbicular X X X X X X X seed0) oblong -C oblong ovoid> | oblong oblong oblong 3 oblong ovoid> m c 0 o Z p z z c c c 0 5 0 3

OJ a ,3 J3 «3 a 5 m & 1 ? 5 i J ■z ,|.-S .g, •S-:- 0 1 'u 5 I .2 E oc-5 continued) n elliptica w c africana e c e e pygmaea longipetala longipetala a longipetala longipetala longipetala repandum filifolium i nana c 5 fruticulosa a; parviflora 1 a arabica I -3.2 S longipetala i Matthioleae _2 canescens Lunarieae - bicornis 5 a ( c kralikii a _2 hirta livida lunaria 5 c: -; 0 ■* Q-3 E - a a g a (J -a ,g 2 S 3 1 | Q D. .2 J 3 Q Q. 3 d c J= .5 pL.§ 1 ~5 a ■s. jS"5xj taxon Tribe -§ S J ■S -^ X -^ X 2 Tribe subsp.3 subsp. 3 3 H subsp. subsp. subsp. r- Q 5 i i 1 Q Table Erysimum Leptaleum& Malcolmiaq Malcolmia~S ~5Malcolmia Ricotia Diceratella Matthiola3 Matthiola Matthiola Matthiola3 Matthiola§ s Matthiola Matthiola Matthiola MorettiaQ 3 nS s & s 4.■*«£ ifl5. s ? s s 5 5 3 % 5 % 370 BLUMEA Vol. 47, No. 2, 2002

"3 u 2 flat i « 2 ■g a 5 i a a 1 73 fine9 fine folds 5 fl folds central micro- coarse m £ 2 ■G O ga is £ ■1 U G G fl u micro- radiate- 1 U folds i'1 w 1 to S to central central with11 2 c central « -J U ll portion; 0 c to to fine central U _fl concave central<* ■5 S M*B sunkeni striates & fine 0 radiate-fl u c to0 43 -3i 2 c 2 > 0 - fine , g 0 "3 fine > 2 '§■ smooth medium ■a 8 ■§ u 1 smooth fine smooth cell ■s ■si-si ■5 position;0 SmS 1 u medium > papilla;s smooth ■R ■§ u > smooth y — -! 1 c with E withI « with with* with .sp S with1 with convex;o convexO S c ? slightly convex;0 ='* concave;§-2 3" a slightly 3 ° -g O -■ ° y M.2 — 9 — M a * w 4J u soconcave „, m u K ll « u u 0 0 micro-reticulate fl '&.« '5. 2 to 3 C "3 "a. 'a. to to to to to2 -a 2 2 2 > > reticulate 5 reticulate o c 3 c a *T a portion;0 g papilla;« 5 portion; S papilla; papilla; "3 papillae; striate central central striate *- Sea folds folds li B u folds 1 S a a u w 0or CI- a •- «*•- fl periclinal domateO convex;o convex;o flat flat domate convex; domateo domateo domate0 flat flat flat domate domate TS flat T3 T3 T3 C TS -0 a. -_i o c EC c ■0 5 d S3

■5 x >* to2 U ~ M> O g 3 c c illfine 1 -S deep fine x tSfine to b0 O to smooth straight .5? c 00 slightly 3=2to sinuous; 2 8 to to2 to « g 2 8 >i slightly slightly slightly ° slightly — - jr 45 '3 smooth smooth folds 3 smooth 'g folds "*- — straight; -5 straight; s § 00 Si O G O T3 X -5 o£ iU o foldso 3 c 0 Ss to to to U to to js B ,,«Q to— 3 - 0 c — 4- a -8 8 ,SP si a « o — O c G ° c sinuous;g c slightly 0 fine sinuous; _' straight1 sinuous fine S ■ -o -3 ■/ -3 T3 x 3 2 ILS-M - - boundaries smooth| -G J= smooth « E E ■a fl '9

u "3 "3 ' "3 "3 "3 >. c5 "3 "3 >-. 75 c 1 i 3 in.S 0 vO c C >. SB direc- BO 1 I 1 1 1 3) 60^ elongate0 ?. 2 shapeX c >» >. \Q >. m m in \j5 5-6-gonal 5-6-gonal, u ~u S 5-6-gonal 4-5-poly- 0 polygonal 5-6-poly- 4-5-gonal polygonal polygonal polygonal polygonalO 0 4-5-6- 1 1 G *5 1 one 8, 4- 5-poly- "a* ■* in n 0- »n c -t >/1 1 § cell 2 u elongate T u - ■ U U CJ in.£ u o w o CJ w tS cj 0" u 0 direction ■c "« a « 'E 'B 'a '5 'E a ii "i " 8 "3 "3 u u s s s a> u S u w OJ u direction i ~ — G m o B — E £ £ E 1*3 E E £ 3 £^ « £-3 § 5 c one I « 2 .2 .2 c .2 c 00 1) 60 .2 •9 .2 S O >i c >» ■5 o elongate "E t3 c 0 ■H -a gonali\o ■O "O gonal T3 T3 gonal gonal tion p epidermal isodiametric, isodiametric, isodiametric, isodiametric, isodiametric, 5-6-polygonal, in isodiametric, isodiametric, isodiametric, isodiametric, Ml isodiametric, isodiametric, isodiametric, 00 °one isodiametric, 8 &o OS «- 1 1 O O 5 C O polygonal, polygonal0 "0 9 V 3 t/j t/1 !rt in .9 .2 .2 .a c- c .£ ■- ■- -

c G C c c H G C G C 3 3 3 G C C S u U U (L) u G BBS y u u u ■_, O x -D X) £( X) X X X X X X X X XXX — 1 E E E E £ E E E £ § 3 3 ill 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 T) y accumbentQ U u incumbentu incumbent(J incumbent(J incumbentO accumbent accumbent incumbentU incumbentU incumbent'J incumbentU incumbentU incumbent0 incumbentu incumbent incumbent■-> Q C C radicleSB c c 3 c c c c 3 3 3 G fl 3 n

X X

(0

'3 a G 3

b £ i rS s 3 G 0 c 0 p £ « Jb X x X colour O is 6 brown X S i i a a c C a c c c » c c ■S * 5 * S 5 * 0 S 2 S £ is 3 yellow-brownish_c yellow-brownish 3 yellow-brownish O o o o 0 0 orange-brown 0 0 1 c p red-brownishT3 73 t; seed light brown brown brown brown brown brown brown brown u 'J brownsuebrown X Xi >* X — £ £ i "d £ X X X >. >^ 5

"1 '/", e> ■«t v} 00 i/1 d \o in >©

— O ** "O "aT 00 Os -t io 0.4-0.5 W)

— — — — - (N >n —• en <1 7 <*) 7 1-1.2x0.8-1 71.5-1.7x1.3-1.5 1-1.5x0.9-1.3 1-1.3x0.6-0.8 0.7-1x0.4-0.5 71.2-1.5x0.4-0.5 1-1.2x0.5-0.6 1-1.3x0.5-0.6 1 1.1-1.4x0.7-0.9 1-1.1x0.5-0.6 1-1.3x0.6-0.7 seed 0.8-1x0.3-0.4 1-1.1x0.5 °° 00 "T1 r- (A <1 7 7 1 7 7 I 0.9-1 0.7-1 0.8-1 — d _ — — d d 0 — 0

Mi B a u u

3 seed1 r3 73

I 1 •0 T3 c "5 0

— = |S > > 0 O "« u fl y shapeX r!ij 0 00 00 GJJ 00 00 &o 00 M M ZljZljZ.il V ■a T3 c c C C C C ■a c c 3 3 3 3 3 o oblong-ellipsoidal0 0 oblong-ellipsoidal0 O O 0 oblong-ellipsoidalC O OOO '5 _o oblong-ovoid oblong-ovoid 11 X X X X X XXX seed1 ovoid> ovoid rounded oblong£> oblongX) X oblongX oblong oblong oblongX oblong oblong 0 0 0 c o o 0 0 Q c 0 OOO

i 1 s u 5 3 I 1 ■Si § I ■c | =: til ft. 1 •c torulosa .a •2 runcinatum septulatum continued) sophia g orientale B5 irio> poly- schimperi C Si E bicorne 1 6, Sisymbrieae ■S a .3 1 parviflora philaeanaa* g £^3 & ( 1z *- E £ 6, s, a a 5 a a 3 g 3 3 2 fl ~ o 2 z < c c 1|1 *1 s II B C ja S coronopifolia s; 4> erysimoides £ g g S 1 s aculeolata ceratum taxon Tribe kneuckeri 5s p o o Olimarabidopsis pumila ?, 2 Crucihimalaya Descurainia Neotorularia Neotorularia III 0 Nasturtiopsis Sisymbrium Sisymbrium Sisymbrium Sisymbrium Sisymbrium Sisymbrium Table Morettia Morettia£ Notoceras Robeschia •2 -S2 -S2 5 5% «U6. Q * 4 O « t>5 E^ t

Arabis Fig. 1—3. SEM photographs of seeds, a. Entire seed; b. enlargement of seed coat. — 1. alpina L. subsp. caucasica (Willd.)Briq. — 2. Arabis nova Vill. — 3. Nasturtium officinale R.Br. 372 BLUMEA Vol. 47, No. 2, 2002 K. Abdel Khalik & L.J.G. van der Maesen: Seed morphology of Brassicaceae tribes 373

of seed coat. — 4. Fig. 4—11. SEM photographs of seeds. a. Entire seed; b. enlargement Rorippa indica (L.) Hiern. — 5. Neslia paniculata (L.) Desv. — 6. Ochthodium aegyptiacum (L.) DC. —

7. Eremobium aegyptiacum subsp. lineare (Delile) Abdel Khalik. — 8. Eremobium aegyptiacum

— — Malcolmia subsp. longisiliquum (Coss.) Maire. 9. Erysimum repandum L. 10. pygmaea (Delile)

Boiss. — 11. Ricotia lunaria (L.) DC. 374 BLUMEA Vol. 47, No. 2, 2002

Fig. 12—14. SEM photographs ofseeds, a. Entire seed; b. enlargement ofseed coat. — 12. Diceratella elliptica (DC.) Jonsell. — 13. Matthiola parviflora (Schousb.) R.Br. — 14. Morettia canescens

Boiss. K. Abdel Khalik & L.J.G. van der Maesen: Seed morphology of Brassicaceae tribes 375

Fig. 15—18. SEM photographsofseeds, a. Entire seed; b. enlargement of seed coat. — 15. Morettia philaeana (Delile) DC. — 16. Crucihimalaya kneuckeri (Bornm.) Al-Shehbaz, O’Kane & R.A.

Price. — 17. Neotorularia aculeolata (Boiss.) Hedge& J. Leonard. — 18. Olimarabidopsis pumila

(Stephan) Al-Shehbaz, O’Kane & R.A. Price. 376 BLUMEA Vol. 47, No. 2, 2002

Fig. 19 & 20. SEM photographs of seeds, a. Entire seed; b. enlargement of seed coat. — 19. Sisym-

brium erysimoides Desf. — 20. Sisymbrium irio L.

2. SEED SIZE

Seed dimensionsvary greatly among the examined taxa, the largest orbicular seeds in Ricotia lunaria have a diameterof 3-8by 2.5-7 mm, and the smallest seeds measure

0.5-1 by 0.3-0.9 mm in Arabis nova, Nasturtiumofficinale, Rorippa, Leptaleum fili- folium, Malcolmia nana, M. pygmaea, Nasturtiopsis, Crucihimalaya kneuckeri, Oli- marabidopsis pumila, Sisymbrium irio, andS. polyceratum, while the rest ofthe species have slightly larger seeds of 1-3 by 0.4-1.7 mm.

The seed size was founduseful to separate between two species ofArabis, species of and of Table Malcolmia, species Sisymbrium ( see 2).

3. SEED COLOUR

The colours of seeds are of high diagnostic and systematic interest among taxa.

The colour of seeds varies from brown, yellow, red-brownish to orange-brownish. In the genus Rorippa, the colour varies from red-brown in R. indica, orange-brown in

R. integerifolia to brown in R. palustris, but the colour in Sisymbrium varies from yellow-brownish in S. erysimoides, S. irio, and 5. runcinatum; brown in S. polyceratum and S. septulatum to orange-brown in,S. orientale. In Malcolmia, the colour is brown in M. africana; green-yellowish in M. nana and yellow-brown in M. pygmaea.

The colour is also used to distinguish between subspecies of Eremobium aegypti- acum; it is yellow-brownish in subsp. aegyptiacum and subsp. longisiliquum and red- brownish in subsp. lineare. K. Abdel Khalik & L.J.G. van der Maesen: Seed morphologyof Brassicaceae tribes 377

Fig. 21. Embryo shapes (radicle/cotyledons position). a & b. Radicle accumbent; c & d. radicle

incumbent. — a & c. Face view; b & d. transverse section.

4. RADICLE/COTYLEDONS POSITION

is character tribes. In Radicle/cotyledons position a significant to separate among

Brassicaceae there are 3 types ofthis position. Conduplicate is common in tribe Brassi-

ceae (El Naggar, 1987); incumbent and accumbent are present throughout the rest of

the family (Fig. 21). This character can vary within the tribe; in tribes Euclidieae and

Hesperideae (accumbent and incumbent), in the tribeEuclideae, accumbent inAnasta-

tica hierochuntica and incumbent in the rest of the tribe, and in the tribe Hesperideae

accumbent in Eremobium and incumbent in the rest of the tribe.

5. EPIDERMAL CELLS

a. Shape

The shape of epidermal cells can be of considerable diagnostic and systematic

value. The cells are almost isodiametric to elongate in one direction, and usually 4-6-

polygonal in most taxa. Epidermal cells ofalmost all seed coats arerandomly arranged, but in Nasturtiopsis coronopifolia, Crucihimalaya kneuckeri, Nasturtium officinale,

Malcolmia nana, and Sisymbrium erysimoides (Fig. 3, 16, 19) they are arranged in

parallel rows. The cell shapes show significant variationbetween taxa oftribe Euclideae:

isodiametric in Anastatica hierochuntica, 4-polygonal in Neslia paniculata (Fig. 5),

polygonal to elongated in one direction in Ochthodium aegyptiacum (Fig. 6), and

5-6-gonal to elongated in one direction in Schimpera arabica. 378 BLUMEA Vol. 47, No. 2, 2002

b. Anticlinalcell wall boundaries

These are generally well developed. There are three types of cell wall boundaries:

1) channelled, straight to sinuous; smooth or foldedin Arabis alpina subsp. caucasica

(Fig. 1), Anastatica hierochuntica, Leptaleum filifolium, Ricotia lunaria (Fig. 11),

Neotorulariaaculeolata(Fig. 17), Sisymbrium erysimoides (Fig. 19), S. polyceratum,

and S. runcinatum; 2) raised-channelled, straight to sinuous; smooth to folds in Neslia

paniculata (Fig. 5) and Sisymbrium septulatum; 3) raised, straight to sinuous; smooth

to folds in the rest of the taxa (Fig. 2-4, 6-10, 12-16, 18, 20).

The anticlinal boundaries and cell wall show a great variation between species

subspecies. In the genus Arabis they vary from channelled, straight to sinuous and

smooth in A. alpina subsp. caucasica (Fig. 1), to raised, straight to sinuous and folded

in A. In the from nova (Fig. 2). genus Sisymbrium they vary channelled, straight to

sinuous and smooth to folded in S. erysimoides (Fig. 19), S. polyceratum, and S. run-

cinatum, from raised, straight to sinuous and smoothto folded in S. orientale and from

smooth in slightly raised, straight and S. irio (Fig. 20), or raised-channelled, straight

to sinuous and smooth in S. septulatum. In Neotorularia they vary from channelled,

sinuous and smooth in N. aculeolata (Fig. 17), to slightly raised, straight and smooth

in N. torulosa.

At subspecies level, this character separates between subspecies of Eremobium

aegyptiacum: from slightly raised, straight and smooth in subsp. aegyptiacum and subsp.

lineare to raised, straight to slightly sinuous and smooth to finely folded in subsp.

longisiliquum (Fig. 7, 8).

c. Periclinalcell wall

1. Outer periclinal cell walls

The curvature ofouter walls can serve as a good diagnostic characterfor the lowest

taxonomic categories. There are 6 different shapes forouter periclinal cell wall: domate

(with a dome), concave, convex, flat, flat to convex, and flat to concave.

1: domate is divided into three domate with flat central Shape types: 1) or concave

portion in Arabis alpina subsp. caucasica (Fig. 1), Leptaleum filifolium, and Sisym-

brium erysimoides (Fig. 19); 2) domate with globular central papillae in Arabis

nova, Erysimum repandum, Morettiaparviflora, Olimarabidopsis pumila, Robe-

schia schimperi, and Sisymbrium septulatum (Fig. 2,9,18); 3) domatewith sunken

central portion in Neotorulariaaculeolata (Fig. 17) and Sisymbrium runcinatum.

Shape 2: convex in Matthiola arabica, Morettia canescens (Fig. 14), M. philaeana

(Fig. 15), Notoceras bicorne, and Neotorularia torulosa.

Shape 3: flat in Nasturtium officinale (Fig. 3) and Matthiolalongipetala subsp. longi-

petala.

4 is divided into three normal flat in Shape types: 1) to convex Rorippa integrifolia,

Schimpera arabica, Eremobium aegyptiacum subsp. aegyptiacum, Eremobium

aegyptiacum subsp. lineare, Malcolmianana, M. pygmaea, Ricotia lunaria, Matthi-

olafruticulosa, Matthiolalongipetala subsp. hirta, and Matthiola longipetala subsp.

kralikii (Fig. 7, 10, 11); 2) flat to convex with flat or concave central portion in

Malcolmia africana and Sisymbrium irio (Fig. 20); 3) flat to convex with sunken

central papillae in Nasturtiopsis coronopifolia, Diceratella elliptica (Fig. 12), and

Anastatica hierochuntica. K. Abdel Khalik & L.J.G. van der Maesen: Seed morphology of Brassicaceae tribes 379

Shape 5: flat to concave in Rorippa indica, R. palustris, Ochthodium aegyptiacum,

Eremobium aegyptiacum subsp. longisiliquum, Matthiola longipetala subsp.

bicornis, Matthiola longipetala subsp. livida, Matthiolaparviflora, and Cruci-

himalaya kneuckeri (Fig. 4, 6, 8, 13, 16).

Shape 6: concave in Neslia paniculata (Fig. 5).

2. Secondary cell wall sculpture

variation varies The surface of the outer cell wall shows a great among taxa. It

from radiate-striate in Arabis nova, Erysimum repandum, Matthiolafruticulosa,

Morettiaparviflora, Notoceras bicorne, and Sisymbrium erysimoides (Fig. 2, 9, 19),

striate in Malcolmia and Robeschia to Rorippa integrifolia, Leptaleum filifolium, nana,

schimperi; micro-papillate in Eremobiumaegyptiacum subsp. lineare, Ricotia lunaria,

and Matthiolaparviflora (Fig. 7, 11, 13); micro-reticulate in Rorippa indica, Och-

thodiumaegyptiacum, Schimpera arabica, Crucihimalaya kneuckeri, Sisymbrium irio,

and S. orientale (Fig. 4,6, 16, 20); macro-reticulate in Nasturtium officinale (Fig. 3);

smooth in Morettiacanescens to smooth to folded in the rest of the taxa (Fig. 14).

KEY TO THE STUDIED TAXA BASED ON SEED CHARACTERS

la. Seeds orbicular, 3-8 by 2.5-7 mm Ricotia lunaria

b. Seeds suborbicular, ovoid, oblong or rounded, 0.6-2.2 by 0.3-1.5 mm 2

2a. Anticlinal boundaries channelled 3

b. Anticlinal boundaries raised or raised-channelled 9

3a. Seeds winged; periclinal cell wall domate with flat to concave central portion;

folded to smooth Arabis alpina subsp. caucasica

b. Seeds wingless; periclinal cell wall domate with sunken central portion or flat to

micro-reticulate convex; striate, radiate-striate, or smooth to folded 4

4a. Periclinal cell wall domate with sunken central portion

Neotorularia aculeolata. Sisymbrium runcinatum

b. Periclinal cell wall flat to convex or domate with flat to concave central portion

5

5a. Periclinalcell wall domate with flat to concave central portion 6

b. Periclinal cell wall flat to convex 7

6a. Seeds oblong-ovoid; the sculpture of periclinal cell wall striate

Leptaleum filifolium

b. Seeds oblong; the sculpture of periclinal cell wallradiate-striate

Sisymbrium erysimoides

7a. Seeds ovoid; periclinal cell wall with slightly sunken central papilla; smooth to

folded Anastatica hierochuntica

b. Seeds oblong-ellipsoidal or oblong; periclinal cell wall with flat or concave central

portion; micro-reticulate or smooth to folded 8

8a. Seeds yellow-brownish; cell shapes isodiametric to 4-5-gonal; sculpture ofperi-

clinal cell wall micro-reticulate Sisymbrium irio

b. Seeds brown; cell shapes polygonal, elongate in one direction; sculpture of peri-

clinal cell wall smooth to folded Sisymbrium polyceratum 380 BLUMEA Vol. 47, No. 2, 2002

9a. Anticlinal boundaries raised-channelled 10

b. Anticlinal boundariesraised without channels 12

10a. Periclinal cell wall concave; smooth to folded Neslia paniculata

b. Periclinal cell wall domateor flat to slightly convex; smooth to folded or micro-

reticulate 11

11a. Epidermal cell shapes isodiametric, polygonal; periclinal cell wall domate with

globular central papillae; smooth to folded Sisymbrium septulatum

cell b. Epidermal cell shapes 5-6-gonal and elongate in one direction; periclinal

wall flat to slightly convex; micro-reticulate Schimpera arabica

12a. Seeds winged 13

b. Seeds wingless 24

13a. Seeds with wide wings 14

16 b. Seeds with narrow wings

folded 14a. Periclinalcell wall flat to slightly concave;

Matthiola longipetala subsp. bicornis

cell flat striate smooth 15 b. Periclinal wall to convex; or to micropapillate

15a. Sculpture of periclinal cell wall smooth to micropapillate; seeds red-brownish

Eremobium aegyptiacum subsp. lineare

b. Sculpture of periclinal cell wall striate; seeds brown . . Matthiolafruticulosa

16a. Periclinalcell wall flat 17

to 18 b. Periclinal cell wall convex, flat to concave or flat convex

17a. Sculpture of periclinal cell wall macro-reticulate; seeds ovoid

Nasturtium officinale

b. Sculpture of periclinal cell wall smooth to fine folds; seeds oblong-ovoid ...

Matthiola longipetala subsp. longipetala

18a. Periclinal cell wall convex Matthiolaarabica

b. Periclinal cell wall flat to convex or flat to concave 19

19a. Periclinal cell wall flat to convex 20

b. Periclinal cell wall flat to concave 22

20a. Periclinal cell wall with sunken central papilla; seeds sub-orbicular to elliptic

Diceratella elliptica

b. Periclinal cell wall with smooth to fine folds; seeds oblong, sub-orbicular or

oblong-ovoid 21

21a. Seeds oblong; 2.2 by 1.2 mm Eremobium aegyptiacum subsp. aegyptiacum

b. Seeds sub-orbicular or oblong-ovoid; 1-1.3 by 0.7-1.1 mm

Matthiolalongipetala subsp. hirta, subsp. kralikii

22a. of cell wall smooth to micro-reticulate; seeds ovoid Sculpture periclinal ....

Rorippa indica

b. Sculpture ofpericlinal cell wall smooth to folds or micro-papillate; seeds oblong

or oblong-ovoid 23

23a. Sculpture of periclinal cell wall micro-papillate; seeds oblong-ovoid

Matthiola parviflora

b. Sculpture of periclinal cell wall smooth to folds; seeds oblong

Matthiolalongipetala subsp. livida,

Eremobium aegyptiacum subsp. longisiliquum 381 K. Abdel Khalik & L.J.G. van der Maesen: Seed morphology of Brassicaceae tribes

24a. Periclinal cell wall convex 25

b. Periclinal cell wall domate, flat to concave or flat to convex 28

25a. Sculpture of periclinal cell wall striate; seeds rounded . .. Notoceras bicorne

b. Sculpture of periclinal cell wall smooth or smooth to fine folds; seeds ovoid or

oblong-ellipsoidal 26

26a. Radicle incumbent; seeds oblong-ellipsoidal Neotorulariatorulosa

b. Radicle accumbent; seeds ovoid 27

27a. Anticlinal boundariesfolded Morettia canescens

b. Anticlinal boundaries smooth Morettia philaeana

28a. Periclinal cell wall domate with globular central papilla 29

b. Periclinal cell wall flat to concave or flat to convex 33

29a. Sculpture of periclinal cell wall smooth Olimarabidopsis pumila

b. Sculpture of periclinal cell wall striate or radiate-striate 30

30a. Radicle incumbent; seeds oblong 31

b. Radicle accumbent; seeds oblong-ovoid or ovoid 32

31a. Sculpture of periclinal cell wall radiate-striate; anticlinal boundaries smooth to

fine folds Erysimum repandum

b. Sculpture of periclinal cell wall striate; anticlinal boundaries smooth to deep

folds Robeschia schimperi

32a. Anticlinal boundaries folds; seeds oblong-ovoid Arabis nova

b. Anticlinal boundaries smooth; seeds ovoid Morettiaparviflora

33a. Periclinal cell wall flat to concave 34

b. Periclinal cell wall flat to convex 36

34a. Radicle accumbent; seeds cordiform to ovoid Rorippa palustris

b. Radicle incumbent; seeds ovoid-oblong or oblong 35

35a. Seeds ovoid-oblong, 2.5-3 by 1.5-1.7 mm; shapes of cellelongate in one direction

and polygonal; anticlinal walls sinuous Ochthodium aegyptiacum

b. Seeds 0.8-1 0.3-0.4 ofcell isodiametric and oblong, by mm; shapes polygonal;

anticlinal walls straight to slightly sinuous Crucihimalaya kneuckeri

36a. Sculpture of periclinal cell wall striate, smooth to fine folds or micro-reticulate

37

of cell wall fine folds b. Sculpture periclinal to coarse 40

37a. of cell wall micro-reticulate orientale Sculpture periclinal .... Sisymbrium

b. Sculpture of periclinal cell wall striate or smooth to fine folds 38

38a. Sculpture of periclinal cell wall smooth to fine folds; seeds oblong; red-brownish

Descurainia sophia

b. Sculpture of periclinal cell wall striate; seeds ovoid, oblong-ellipsoidal or ovoid

to ellipsoid; orange-brown or yellow-brownish 39

39a. Radicle accumbent; seeds ovoid to ellipsoid Rorippa integrifolia

b. Radicle incumbent; seeds ovoid or oblong-ellipsoidal

Malcolmianana, Malcolmiapygmaea

40a. Sculpture of periclinal cell wall with flat centralportion; cell shapes isodiametric

and polygonal; seeds oblong Malcolmiaafricana

b. Sculpture of periclinal cell wall with sunken central papillae; cell patterns 5-6-

polygonal and elongate in one direction; seeds oblong-ellipsoidal

Nasturtiopsis coronopifolia 382 BLUMEA Vol. 47, No. 2, 2002

REFERENCES

Al-Shehbaz, I. A. 1984. The tribes ofCruciferae (Brassicaceae) in the southeastern United States.

J. Arnold Arbor. 65: 343-373.

Aniszewski, T., K.H. Mervi & A.J. Leinonen. 2001. Seed number, seed size and seed diversity in

WashingtonLupin (Lupinus polyphyllus Lindl.). Annals of Botany 87: 77-82.

Barthlott, W. 1981. Epidermal and seed surface characters of plants: Systematic applicability and

some evolutionary aspects. Nord. J. Bot. 1: 345-355.

Barthlott, W. 1984. Microstructural features of seed surface. In: V.H. Heywood & D.C. Moore

Academic London. (eds.), Current concepts in plant taxonomy: 95-105. Press,

some of Brassica, based on Berggren, G. 1962. Reviews on the taxonomy of species the genus

their seeds. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 56: 65-135.

Canne, J.M.I 979. A light and scanning electron microscope study ofseed morphology in Agalinis

(Scrophulariaceae) and its taxonomic significance. Syst. Bot. 4: 281-296.

Canne, J.M. 1980. Seed surface features in Aureolaria,Brachystigma, Tomanthera and certain South

American Agalinis (Scrophulariaceae). Syst. Bot. 5: 241-152.

Chance, G.D. & J.D. Bacon. 1984. Systematic implications of seed coat morphology in Nama

(Hydrophyllaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 71: 829-842.

Chuang, T.I. & L.R. Heckard. 1972. Seed coat morphology in Cordylanthus (Scrophulariaceae)

and its taxonomic significance. Amer. J. Bot. 59: 258-265.

Clark, C. & J. A. Jernstedt. 1978. Systematic studies ofEschscholzia (Papaveraceae). II. Seed coat microsculpturing. Syst. Bot. 3: 386-402.

Corner, E.J.H. 1976. The seeds ofDicotyledons, 2 vols. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Crow, G.E. 1979. The systematic significance of seed morphology in Sagina (Caryophyllaceae)

under scanning electron microscopy. Brittonia 31: 52-63.

Dahlgren, R. 1979-1980. Angiospermernes taxonomi 1-3. Akademisk Forlag, Copenhagen.

Dahlgren, R.M. & H.T. Clifford. 1982. The monocotyledons. Academic Press, London.

El Naggar, S.M. 1987. Studies of the family Cruciferae in Egypt. PhD thesis,Assiut University.

El Naggar, S.M. & M.N. El Hadidi. 1998. The tribe Alysseae Hayek (Brassicaceae) in Egypt.

J. Union Arab Biol. Cairo 6: 501-520.

Fayed, A.A. & S.M. El Naggar. 1988. Taxonomic studies on Cruciferae in Egypt 2. Taxonomic significance of the seed coat sculpture in species oftribe Brassiceae. Taeckholmia 11: 87-95.

Fayed, A. A. & S. M. El Naggar. 1996.Taxonomic studies on Cruciferae in Egypt 4. Seed morphology

and taxonomy of the Egyptian species of Lepidieae. Bull. Fac. Sci. Assiut Univ. 25: 43-50.

Haridasan, V.K. & P.K. Mukheijee. 1993. Seed surface features in Indian Lobeliaceae. Phyto-

morphology 43: 287-294.

Cruciferae. Hedge,I.C. 1976.A systematic and geographicalsurvey of Old World In: J.G. Vaughan,

A.J. Macleod & B.M.G. Jones (eds.), The biology and chemistry of the Cruciferae: 1-46. Aca-

demic Press, London.

Heyn, C.C. & I. Herrnstadt. 1977. Seed coat structure of Old World Lupinus species. Bot. Not.

130: 427-435.

Heywood, V.H. 1971. Scanning electron microscopy. Systematic and evolutionary applications.

London.

Hill, R.J. 1976. Taxonomic and phylogenetic significance of seed microsculpturing in Mentzelia

(Loasaceae) in Wyoming and adjacent Western states. Brittonia 28: 86-112.

Huber, H. 1969. Die Samenmerkmale und Verwandtschaftsverhaltnisse der Liliiflorae. Mitteil.

Bot. Staatssamml. MUnchen 8: 219-538.

Jonsell, B. 1975. Lepidium L. (Cruciferae) in tropical Africa. A morphological, taxonomical and

phytogeographical study. Bot. Not. 128: 151-163.

Jonsell,B. 1979. New taxa of Cruciferae from East tropical Africa and Madagascar. Bot. Not. 132:

521-535.

Jonsell, B. 1986. A monographof Farsetia (Cruciferae). Symb. Bot. Ups. 25: 1-106.

Juan, R., J. Pastor & I. Fernandez. 2000. SEM and light microscope observations on fruit and seeds

in Scrophulariaceae from southwest Spain and their systematic significance. Annals of Botany

86: 323-338. K. Abdel Khalik & L.J.G. van der Maesen: Seed morphology of Brassicaceae tribes 383

Kanak Sahai,K. Harbans & P. Aruna. 1997. Macro- and micromorphological seed characteristics

of some Cassia species and their taxonomic significance. Phytomorphology 47: 273-279.

Kapil, R.N., J. Bor & F. Bouman. 1980. Seed appendages in Angiosperms. I. Introduction. Bot.

Jahrb. Syst. 101: 555-573.

Karam, M.F. 1997. Scanning electron microscope studies of seed characters in Trifolium L.

(Fabaceae). Phytomorphology 47: 51-56.

Kondo, M. 1917. Untersuchung der Samen der in Japan Vertretenen Brassica-Arten. Ein Beitrag

der Sortenunterschiede. Berichte des Ohara Inst. F. Landw. zur genauen Feststellung Forschung,

Bd. I: 123-150.

Koul, K.K., N. Ranjna & S.N. Raina. 2000. Seed coat microsculpturing in Brassica and allied

Annals of 86: 385-397. genera (subtribes Brassicinae, Raphaninae, Moricandiinae). Botany

Matthews, J.F. & P. A. Levins. 1986. The systematic significance ofseed morphology in Portulaca

(Portulacaceae) under scanning electron microscopy. Syst. Bot. 11: 302-308.

M. 1948. Seeds and of the Brassica. Canadian J. of Research 26: 520- McGugan, seedlings genus

587.

Mulligan, G.A. & L.G. Bailey. 1976. Seed coats of some Brassica and Sinapis weedy and cultivated

in Canada. Econ. Bot. 30: 143-148.

Murley, M.R. 1951. Seeds of the Cruciferae ofnortheastern North America. The American Midland

Naturalist 46: 1-81.

Musil, A.F. 1948. Distinguishing species of Brassica by their seeds. U.S. Dept. Agr. Washington,

D.C. Misc. Pub. No. 643.

L.J. & W.F. Mann. 1976.A ofsurface characteristics of of Musselman, survey seeds Scrophulariaceae

and Orobanchaceae using scanning electron microscopy. Phytomorphology 26: 370-378.

Newell, C.A. & T. Hymowitz. 1978. Seed coat variation in Glycine Wild, subgenus Glycine (Legu-

minosae) by SEM. Brittonia 30: 76-88.

Prasad, K. 1976. Seed coat structure and developmentin certain species of Cruciferae. New Botanist

3: 95-103.

Schulz, O.E. 1936. Cruciferae. In: A. Engler & K. Prantl (eds.), Die natiirlichen Pflanzenfamilien

17B: 227-658. Engelmann, Leipzig.

Seavey, S.R., R.E. Magill & P.H. Raven. 1977. Evolution ofseed size, shape and surface architecture

in the tribe Epilobieae (Onagraceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 64: 18-47.

Segarra, J.G.& I. Mateu. 2001. Seed morphology ofLinaria species from eastern Spain: identifica-

tion of species and taxonomic implications. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 135: 375-389.

Shanmukha, S.R. & M. Leela. 1993. Seed morphology (LM and SEM) in some IpomoeaL. (Con-

volvulaceae).Feddes Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 104: 209-213.

Stace, C.A. 1965. Cuticular studies as an aid to plant taxonomy. Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Bot.

4: 1-78.

Stork, A.L. 1971. Seed characters in European taxa of Malcolmia R.Br. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 65:

283-292.

Stork, A.L. 1972. Seeds and seedlings of Malcolmia sens. lat. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 66: 417-433.

Stork, A.L., S. Songerup & J. Wiiest. 1980. Seed characters in Brassica section Brassica and some

related Candollea 35: 421-450. groups.

Stork, A.L. & J. Wiiest. 1978. SEM studies of seed coats in Malcolmia (Cruciferae). Arch. Sci.

Phys. Nat. 31: 229-237.

Stork, A.L. & J. Wiiest. 1980. Morettia DC. (Cruciferae): a morphological and taxonomical study.

Bol. Soc. Brot. Ser. 2, 53: 241-273.

Vaughan, J.G. & J.M. Whitehouse. 1971. Seed structure and the taxonomy of the Cruciferae. Bot.

J. Linn. Soc. 64: 383-409.

Whiffin, T. & A.S. Tomb. 1972. The systematic significance of seed morphologyin the neotropical capsular-fruited Melastomataceae. Amer. J. Bot. 59: 411-422.

Wofford, B.E. 1981. External seed morphology ofArenaria (Caryophyllaceae) ofthe southeastern

United States. Syst. Bot. 6: 126-135.