DOCSLIB.ORG

Modelling Forest Growth and Yield

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modelling Forest Growth and Yield Modelling Forest Growth and Yield Applications to Mixed Tropical Forests Jerome K. Vanclay Professor of Tropical Forestry Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University Copenhagen Currently: Professor of Sustainable Forestry, Southern Cross University, Lismore NSW Australia Originally published in 1994 by CAB International, Wallingford UK as ISBN 0 85198 913 6 Note: for reasons best known to the WordPerfect people, this version has pagination similar, but not identical to the CABI edition. Dedicated to all those working toward the sustainable management of tropical forests, and especially to my daughter Erica, in the hope that she too may find the tropical forests as interesting, diverse and extensive as I have. Contents Figures ................................................ viii Tables................................................... xi Preface ................................................. xiii Foreword ................................................xv Acknowledgements ...................................... xvii 1. Introduction ........................................... 1 Role of Growth Models.................................. 2 What is a Growth Model? ................................ 4 Growth Modelling Approaches............................ 5 Components of a Model ................................. 8 Choosing a Model ...................................... 9 Examples ............................................ 10 Exercises ............................................ 13 2. Whole Stand Models ................................... 14 Growth and Yield Tables ............................... 14 Growth and Yield Equations............................. 16 More Detailed Whole Stand Approaches . 22 Synthesis ............................................ 31 Exercises ............................................ 32 3. Size Class Models ...................................... 34 Stand Table Approaches ................................ 34 Transition Matrices .................................... 43 Cohort Models ........................................ 50 Synthesis ............................................ 55 Exercises ............................................ 55 v vi Modelling Forest Growth and Yield 4. Single-tree and Tree List Models ......................... 57 Single-tree Spatial Models .............................. 58 Single-tree Non-spatial Models . 68 Tree List Models ...................................... 71 Synthesis ............................................ 77 Exercises ............................................ 77 5. Data Requirements .................................... 79 Differing Data Needs................................... 80 Data for Modelling .................................... 84 Data Collection ....................................... 91 Synthesis ........................................... 101 Exercises ........................................... 102 6. Constructing Growth Models ........................... 103 Model Design ....................................... 104 Regression Techniques ................................ 112 Statistical Assumptions ................................ 119 Strategies for Grouping Data............................ 127 Synthesis ........................................... 131 Exercises ........................................... 132 7. Forest Site Evaluation ................................. 134 Phytocentric Methods ................................. 136 Geocentric Methods................................... 145 Practical Considerations ............................... 151 Synthesis ........................................... 154 Exercises ........................................... 155 8. Diameter Increment .................................. 156 What to Model....................................... 156 Diameter Increment Functions . 162 Synthesis ........................................... 170 Exercises ........................................... 170 9. Mortality and Merchantability ......................... 172 Natural Mortality..................................... 173 Harvesting and other Human Factors . 182 Merchantability ...................................... 187 Synthesis ........................................... 190 Exercises ........................................... 190 10. Regeneration and Recruitment ........................ 192 Recruitment Models .................................. 193 Regeneration Models.................................. 201 Synthesis ........................................... 202 Exercises ........................................... 203 Contents vii 11. Model Evaluation and Re-calibration ................... 204 Model Criticism...................................... 205 Benchmark Tests ..................................... 211 Re-calibration ....................................... 219 Synthesis ........................................... 221 Exercises ........................................... 221 12. Implementation and Use .............................. 223 Implementing the Model ............................... 224 Resource Data for Simulation Studies . 225 Optimization Studies .................................. 229 Yield Prediction...................................... 234 Synthesis ........................................... 240 Exercises ........................................... 241 13. Future Directions .................................... 243 Models for all Forests ................................. 244 Different Management Needs ........................... 245 Environmental Changes ............................... 247 Integration with other Models ........................... 248 Model Construction and Use............................ 249 Presentation of Information............................. 249 Synthesis ........................................... 250 References ............................................. 252 Glossary .............................................. 275 Symbols ............................................ 275 Common and Botanical Species Names . 277 Terminology ........................................ 279 Solutions to Selected Exercises ............................ 285 Author Index .......................................... 298 Subject Index .......................................... 304 Figures Fig. 1.1. The role of growth models and complementary data in providing forest management information. 2 Fig. 1.2. The role of growth models in decision making, forest management and the formulation of forest policy. 3 Fig. 1.3. Yield table, curves and equation for Eucalyptus deglupta. 5 Fig. 1.4. Components of forest growth and the analogous representation in a stand growth model. 9 Fig. 2.1. Yield predictions for logged dipterocarp forest. 18 Fig. 2.2. Basal area increment curves for Callitris stands. 20 Fig. 2.3. Possible diameter distributions generated by the Weibull p.d.f........................................... 24 Fig. 2.4. Vector field illustrating a 2-dimensional state-space model. .............................................. 28 Fig. 2.5. Markov chain representation of a model. 29 Fig. 2.6. Markov matrix and its steady state. 30 Fig. 3.1. Stand table projection with movement ratio 0.25. 36 Fig. 3.2. Smoothing an uneven-aged stand table results in smaller estimates of upgrowth for a given movement ratio. 39 Fig. 3.3. Markov chain representation of Fig. 3.1 and Equation 3.1. .............................................. 44 Fig. 3.4. Single projection with a matrix model. 49 Fig. 3.5. Changes in tree rank in a pine stand. 50 Fig. 3.6. Tree record in cohort model represented by species, size and expansion factor. ............................ 52 Fig. 4.1. Competition indices include the competitive influence zone, area potentially available, size-distance, sky view and light interception approaches. 59 Fig. 4.2. Outputs from the PLATIPUS prototype included stem and branch profiles, and ring and knot patterns. 65 Fig. 4.3. Tree records representing a forest stand. 72 viii Fig. 4.4. Record tripling in the Prognosis model. 73 Fig. 4.5. Look-up tables can be used to find the coefficients to be used in equations to predict growth, mortality, recruitment, etc. ........................................... 75 Fig. 5.1. Interpolation is safer than extrapolation. 82 Fig. 5.2. Efficient placement of ten samples. 84 Fig. 5.3. Database weaknesses revealed by comparing dynamic and static inventory data. ............................. 87 Fig. 5.4. Recommended plot layout for permanent sample plots. 91 Fig. 5.5. Example of a field form for measuring PSPs. 98 Fig. 6.1. Concepts of precision and bias. 105 Fig. 6.2. Growth and yield forms of equations are analogous. 107 Fig. 6.3. Forms of the Bertalanffy equation. 111 Fig. 6.4. Dangers of extrapolating empirical models. 113 Fig. 6.5. Graphs for screening data and models. 114 Fig. 6.6. Interpreting residual plots. 115 Fig. 6.7. Principal component and least squares fit to data. 116 Fig. 6.8. Serial correlation may be minimized by modelling growth as a function of initial size. 120 Fig. 6.9. The R² does not indicate how well a model fits the data. 126 Fig. 6.10. Different species groupings based on growth trends. 129 Fig. 7.1. Site index of western larch estimated from the height–diameter relationship. 139 Fig. 7.2. Height–diameter curves used to estimate site productivity in Callitris stands in south-eastern Queensland. 140 Fig. 7.3. Growth index equation for Cardwellia sublimis. ...... 144 Fig. 8.1. Periodic increment may be a better predictor of growth at the mean diameter and competition
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Allometric Equations for Biomass Estimation of Woody Species and Organic Soil Carbon Stocks of Agroforestry Systems in West African: State of Current Knowledge
    International Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry Volume 2, Issue 10, October 2015, PP 17-33 ISSN 2394-5907 (Print) & ISSN 2394-5915 (Online) Allometric Equations for Biomass Estimation of Woody Species and Organic Soil Carbon Stocks of Agroforestry Systems in West African: State Of Current Knowledge Massaoudou Moussa1, Larwanou Mahamane2, Mahamane Saadou3 1Department of Natural Resources Management (DGRN), National Institute of Agricultural Research of Niger (INRAN), BP 240 Maradi, Niger 2African Forest Forum (AFF) C/o World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF), P.O. Box 30677–00100, Nairobi, Kenya 3Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University Abdou Moumouni of Niamey, Niamey, Niger ABSTRACT Since the Kyoto Protocol, agroforestry is considered as a mitigation and adaptation tool to climate change. Agro forestry systems are nowadays the subject of many investigations all over the world. This is because of their potential for carbon sequestration and storage. The parklands are some ancient cultural systems with a wide distribution in West Africa. The contribution of these systems to climate change mitigation has to do with the organic carbon storage in soils and sequestration of atmospheric carbon. This study aims at presenting an overview of the current knowledge on soils organic carbon and allometric equations for estimating aboveground biomass in agro forestry land use systems in West Africa. Significant amounts of carbon, ranging from 0.29 to 32 MgC.ha-1.year-1, were sequestered according to specific argroforestry systems. Yet, allometric equations for many species are lacking as carbon stock in several soil types needs to be estimated. Indeed, further studies need to be undertaken therein.
    [Show full text]
  • On Permaculture Design: More Thoughts
    On Permaculture Design: More Thoughts ON PERMACULTURE DESIGN: MORE THOUGHTS, IDEAS, METHODOLOGIES, PRINCIPLES, TEMPLATES, STEPS, WANDERINGS, EFFICIENCIES, DEFICIENCIES, CONUNDRUMS AND WHATEVER STRIKES THE FANCY ... PERMACULTURE AND SUSTAINABLE SITE DESIGN Today professionals and students in business, government, education, healthcare, building, economics, technology, and ntal environme sciences are being called upon to ‘design’ sustainable programs and activities. Through systems science we have learned that actions taken today can affect the viability of living systems to support human activity and evolution for many generations to come. Sustainability is a concept introduced to communicate the imperative for humanity to develop in nment our built enviro those conditions that will sustain the structures, functions, and processes inextricably linked with capacities for life. The challenge we face in this new era of sustainability is a realization that the goals and needs for developing sustainable conditions in our social environment are complex, diverse, and at times counter to the dynamics of ecological systems. In recent years ecology has been called upon to include the studies of how humans interrelate with ecological processes, within ecosystems. Although humans are part of the natural ecosystem when we speak of human ecology, the relationships between humanity and the t environment, i is helpful to think of the ‘environment’ as the social system. What are the relationships and interactions within this ecosystem? What are the relationships and interactions between the social system and ecological environment (this includes air, soil, water, physical living and nonliving structures)? How do the interactions systems, between affect the global ecosystem? The most fundamental means we have as a society in transforming human ecology is through modeling and designing in our social environment those conditions that will influence sustainable interactions and relationships within the global ecological system.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 IPCC SRCCL
    Second Order Draft Chapter 1 IPCC SRCCL 1 Chapter 1: Framing and Context 2 3 Coordinating Lead Authors: Almut Arneth (Germany) and Fatima Denton (Gambia) 4 Lead Authors: Fahmuddin Agus (Indonesia), Aziz Elbehri (Morocco), Karheinz Erb (Italy), Balgis Osman 5 Elasha (Cote d’Ivoire), Mohammad Rahimi (Iran), Mark Rounsevell (United Kingdom), Adrian Spence 6 (Jamaica) and Riccardo Valentini (Italy) 7 Contributing Authors: Peter Alexander (United Kingdom), Yuping Bai (China), Ana Bastos (Portugal), 8 Niels Debonne (The Netherlands), Thomas Hertel (United States of America), Rafaela Hillerbrand 9 (Germany), Baldur Janz (Germany), Ilva Longva (United Kingdom), Patrick Meyfroidt (Belgium), Michael 10 O'Sullivan (United Kingdom) 11 Review Editors: Edvin Aldrian (Indonesia), Bruce McCarl (United States of America), Maria Jose Sanz 12 Sanchez (Spain) 13 Chapter Scientist: Yuping Bai (China), Baldur Janz (Germany) 14 Date of Draft: 16/11/2018 15 Do Not Cite, Quote or Distribute 1-1 Total pages: 87 Second Order Draft Chapter 1 IPCC SRCCL 1 Table of Contents 2 3 Chapter 1: Framing and Context .......................................................................................................... 1-1 4 Executive summary .................................................................................................................... 1-3 5 Introduction and scope of the report .......................................................................................... 1-5 6 Objectives and scope of the assessment ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Maximum Sustainable Yield from Interacting Fish Stocks in an Uncertain World: Two Policy Choices and Underlying Trade-Offs Arxiv
    Maximum sustainable yield from interacting fish stocks in an uncertain world: two policy choices and underlying trade-offs Adrian Farcas Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science Pakefield Road, Lowestoft NR33 0HT, United Kingdom [email protected] Axel G. Rossberg∗ Queen Mary University of London, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 327 Mile End Rd, London E1, United Kingdom and Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science Pakefield Road, Lowestoft NR33 0HT, United Kingdom [email protected] 26 May 2016 c Crown copyright Abstract The case of fisheries management illustrates how the inherent structural instability of ecosystems can have deep-running policy implications. We contrast ten types of management plans to achieve maximum sustainable yields (MSY) from multiple stocks and compare their effectiveness based on a management strategy evalua- tion (MSE) that uses complex food webs in its operating model. Plans that target specific stock sizes (BMSY) consistently led to higher yields than plans targeting spe- cific fishing pressures (FMSY). A new self-optimising control rule, introduced here arXiv:1412.0199v6 [q-bio.PE] 31 May 2016 for its robustness to structural instability, led to intermediate yields. Most plans outperformed single-species management plans with pressure targets set without considering multispecies interactions. However, more refined plans to \maximise the yield from each stock separately", in the sense of a Nash equilibrium, produced total yields comparable to plans aiming to maximise total harvested biomass, and were more robust to structural instability. Our analyses highlight trade-offs between yields, amenability to negotiations, pressures on biodiversity, and continuity with current approaches in the European context.
    [Show full text]
  • Allometric Equations for Four Valuable Tropical Tree Species Thomas G
    Forest Ecology and Management 229 (2006) 351–360 www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Allometric equations for four valuable tropical tree species Thomas G. Cole, John J. Ewel * USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Institute of Pacific Islands Forestry, 60 Nowelo Street, P.O. Box 4370, Hilo, HI 96720, USA Received 22 March 2005; received in revised form 7 April 2006; accepted 8 April 2006 Abstract Four tree species were harvested periodically over a 13-year period from plantations in the humid lowlands of Costa Rica: Cedrela odorata, Cordia alliodora, Hyeronima alchorneoides, and Euterpe oleracea. The soil was a well-drained, volcanic alluvium, and high fertility coupled with 4 m of annual rainfall and high temperatures led to rapid growth rates; at age 13 many individual were >30 cm dbh and >30 m tall. Harvested trees were dissected into their component parts: leaves, rachises (for Cedrela and Euterpe), branches, boles, and coarse roots (i.e., >0.5 cm diameter). Roots of small trees were excavated in their entirety; those of large trees were harvested from a cylinder 1.0 m in diameter, immediately beneath the trunk. Large numbers of trees were sampled: 258–379 per species. Size classes sampled ranged from seedlings too small to have a dbh to trees of 30 cm dbh. Two separate allometric equations (one for trees having only a basal diameter and another for trees having a dbh), with diameter- squared times height as the metrics, were developed for each component of each species. Based on breaks in linear trends of ln–ln plots and deviations of predicted from actual values, we developed separate allometric equations, by component, for trees of different sizes.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability in International Law - S
    INTRODUCTION TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT – Sustainability in International Law - S. Wood SUSTAINABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL LAW S. Wood Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, Canada Keywords: Agenda 21, Brundtland Commission, Climate Change Convention, Convention on Biological Diversity, developed countries, developing countries, development, Earth Summit, ecological limits, economic growth, ecosystem approach, environmental protection, fisheries, equity, international agreements, international environmental law, international institutions, international law, marine living resources, maximum sustainable yield, natural resources, optimum utilization, precautionary principle, Rio Declaration, Stockholm Conference, Stockholm Declaration, sustainability, sustainable development, sustainable utilization, UNEP, United Nations, World Charter for Nature. Contents 1. Introduction 1.1 Overview of the Subject 1.2 Scope of the Article 1.3 What is International Law? 1.3.1 What Counts as “Law”? 1.3.2 Who Are the “Members of the International Community”? 2. Origins of Sustainability in International Law 3. Sustainability as Optimal Exploitation of Living Resources 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Sustainability as Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) 3.3 The MSY Era in International Law 3.3.1 MSY’s Rise to Prominence 3.3.2 Early Results and Controversies 3.4 The UN Law of the Sea Convention and the Displacement of MSY 3.5 Recent Trends 3.5.1 The Greening of International Fisheries Law 3.5.2 The Ascendancy of the “Sustainable Utilization” Paradigm 3.6 Conclusion 4. Sustainability as Respect for Ecological Limits 4.1 Sustainability as a General Concern with Human-Nature Interaction 4.2 EmergenceUNESCO of Sustainability as “Limits – to Growth”EOLSS 4.2.1 The 1972 Stockholm Conference 4.2.2 The 1982SAMPLE World Charter for Nature CHAPTERS 4.3 Contemporary Manifestations 4.4 Conclusion 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and Food Systems
    United Nations Food Systems Summit 2021 Scientific Group https://sc-fss2021.org/ Food Systems Summit Brief Prepared by Research Partners of the Scientific Group for the Food Systems Summit, May 2021 Climate Change and Food Systems by Alisher Mirzabaev, Lennart Olsson, Rachel Bezner Kerr, Prajal Pradhan, Marta Guadalupe Rivera Ferre, Hermann Lotze-Campen 1 Abstract Introduction Climate change affects the Climate change affects the functioning of all the components of food functioning of all the components of food systems, often in ways that exacerbate systems1 which embrace the entire range existing predicaments and inequalities of actors and their interlinked value-adding between regions of the world and groups in activities involved in the production, society. At the same time, food systems are aggregation, processing, distribution, a major cause for climate change, consumption, and recycling of food accounting for a third of all greenhouse gas products that originate from agriculture emissions. Therefore, food systems can (including livestock), forestry, fisheries, and and should play a much bigger role in food industries, and the broader economic, climate policies. This policy brief highlights societal, and natural environments in nine actions points for climate change which they are embedded2. At the same adaptation and mitigation in the food time, food systems are a major cause of systems. The policy brief shows that climate change, contributing about a third numerous practices, technologies, (21–37%) of the total Greenhouse Gas knowledge and social capital already exist (GHG) emissions through agriculture and for climate action in the food systems, with land use, storage, transport, packaging, multiple synergies with other important processing, retail, and consumption3 goals such as the conservation of (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Tree Crown Allometry on Community Dynamics in Mixed
    Article The Effect of Tree Crown Allometry on Community Dynamics in Mixed-Species Stands versus Monocultures. A Review and Perspectives for Modeling and Silvicultural Regulation Hans Pretzsch Centre of Life and Food Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, Hans-Carl-von-Carlowitz-Platz 2, 85354 Freising, Germany; [email protected]; Tel.: +49-8161-71-4710 Received: 14 August 2019; Accepted: 11 September 2019; Published: 17 September 2019 Abstract: Many recent studies have shown that the structure, density, and productivity of mixed-species stands can differ from the weighted mean of monospecific stands of the respective species. The tree and stand properties emerging by inter-specific neighborhood should be considered in models for understanding and practical management. A promising approach for this is a more realistic representation of the individual tree allometry in models and management concepts, as tree allometry determines many structural and functional aspects at the tree and stand level. Therefore, this paper is focused on the crown allometry in mixed and mono-specific stands. Firstly, we review species-specific differences in the crown allometry in monospecific stands. Secondly, we show how species-specific differences and complementarities in crown allometry can emerge in mixed-species stands. Thirdly, the consequences of allometric complementarity for the canopy packing density will be analyzed. Fourthly, we trace the crown allometry from the tree level to the stand density and show the relevance for the self-thinning in mixed versus monospecific stands. Fifth, the consequence of the findings for modeling and regulating tree and stand growth will be discussed. The review deals mainly with widespread even-aged, mono-layered stands, but the main results apply for more heterogeneous stands analogously.
    [Show full text]
  • ABOVE GROUND BIOMASS ESTIMATION in PALM TREES USING TERRESTRIAL Lidar and TREE MODELLING 14 March 2017
    Centre for Geo-Information Thesis Report GIRS-2017-05 ABOVE GROUND BIOMASS ESTIMATION IN PALM TREES USING TERRESTRIAL LiDAR AND TREE MODELLING Adriana Careli Caballero Rodríguez March 2017 th 14 I II Above ground biomass estimation in palm trees using Terrestrial LiDAR and tree modelling Adriana Careli Caballero Rodríguez Registration number 88 07 15 154 020 Supervisors: MSc. Alvaro Iván Lau Sarmiento Dr. Harm Bartholomeus A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of Master of Science at Wageningen University and Research Centre, The Netherlands. 14th March 2017 Wageningen, the Netherlands Thesis code number: GRS-80436 Thesis Report: GIRS-2017-05 Wageningen University and Research Centre Laboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing III IV Foreword The use of LiDAR point clouds in forest management has become more common due to its accuracy and repeatability of analysis. This remote sensing technique in combination with other methods has contributed to obtain different quantitative estimates of tropical forests characteristics such as tree volume, biomass, gap fraction, etc. Specially, tropical forests contain most of the world’s terrestrial biodiversity and are considered as carbon stores. However, forest deforestation and degradation have contributed to the increase of greenhouse gases emissions, and loss of forest extension and biodiversity. Thus, these quantitative estimates as part of forest management contributes to address forest deforestation and degradation. Therefore, I chose this topic to conduct my master thesis project, motivated by my interest and enjoy of LiDAR, and to propose a method to calculate above ground biomass of two palm species from the Peruvian amazon without having reference data.
    [Show full text]
  • Allometric Equations for Estimating Tree Aboveground Biomass in Tropical Dipterocarp Forests of Vietnam
    Article Allometric Equations for Estimating Tree Aboveground Biomass in Tropical Dipterocarp Forests of Vietnam Bao Huy 1,2, Krishna P. Poudel 2, Karin Kralicek 2, Nguyen Dinh Hung 3, Phung Van Khoa 4, Vu Tan Phương 5 and Hailemariam Temesgen 2,* 1 Department of Forest Resources and Environment Management, Tay Nguyen University, 567 Le Duan, Buon Ma Thuot, Dak Lak 630000, Vietnam; [email protected] 2 Department of Forest Engineering, Resources and Management, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97333, USA; [email protected] (K.P.P.); [email protected] (K.K.) 3 Forest Inventory and Planning Institute, Vinh Quynh, Thanh Tri, Ha Noi 100000, Vietnam; [email protected] 4 Vietnam National University of Forestry, Xuan Mai, Chuong My, Ha Noi 100000, Vietnam; [email protected] 5 Vietnamese Academy of Forest Sciences, Ðuc Thang, Bac Tu Liem, Ha Noi 100000, Vietnam; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-541-7378549; Fax: +1-541-7379126 Academic Editors: Shibu Jose and Timothy A. Martin Received: 23 May 2016; Accepted: 16 August 2016; Published: 22 August 2016 Abstract: There are few allometric equations available for dipterocarp forests, despite the fact that this forest type covers extensive areas in tropical Southeast Asia. This study aims to develop a set of equations to estimate tree aboveground biomass (AGB) in dipterocarp forests in Vietnam and to validate and compare their predictive performance with allometric equations used for dipterocarps in Indonesia and pantropical areas. Diameter at breast height (DBH), total tree height (H), and wood density (WD) were used as input variables of the nonlinear weighted least square models.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Pumping Allocations Under California's Sustainable
    Groundwater Pumping Allocations under California’s Sustainable Groundwater Management Act CONSIDERATIONS FOR GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY AGENCIES Environmental Defense Fund New Current Water and Land, LLC Christina Babbitt, principal co-author Daniel M. Dooley, principal co-author Maurice Hall Richard M. Moss David L. Orth Gary W. Sawyers Environmental Defense Fund is dedicated to protecting the environmental rights of all people, including the right to clean air, clean water, healthy food, and flourishing ecosystems. Guided by science, we work to create practical solutions that win lasting political, economic, and social support because they are nonpartisan, cost-effective, and fair. New Current Water and Land, LLC, offers a variety of strategic services to those who want to develop, acquire, transfer, exchange or bank water supplies throughout California, as well as to those seeking to access the unique investment space that is Western water and other Western states agriculture. Support for this report was provided by the Water Foundation waterfdn.org © July 2018 Environmental Defense Fund The complete report is available online at edf.org/groundwater-allocations-report fundamental principles of groundwater law, the schemes Introduction are likely to be more durable, and GSAs are more likely The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) to achieve sustainable groundwater management in a became law on January 1, 2015, forever changing the legally defensible manner. To do this, we first provide manner in which groundwater will be managed in background on the nature of groundwater rights and California. It requires local Groundwater Sustainability how the hierarchy of groundwater rights may affect Agencies (GSAs) to be formed and Groundwater the legal defensibility of pumping allocations imposed Sustainability Plans (GSPs) to be prepared in order to by GSAs upon pumpers.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Inventory
    Forest Inventory Basic knowledge The Forest Inventory Module is intended for people involved in the collection of data on forest resources. It provides insights into the types and purposes of forest inventories and sets out the main steps in conducting them, from measurement methods to data collection. The module provides basic and more detailed information on forest inventory, as well as links to forest inventory tools and case studies of effective forest inventories. Forest inventory is the systematic collection of data on the forestry resources within a given area. It allows assessment of the current status and lays the ground for analysis and planning, constituting the basis for sustainable forest management. In general, all inventory operations should follow at least the following steps: Definition of the inventory objectives and information desired. Development of sampling design and methods. Data collection (field surveys, remote sensing data analysis and other sources). Data analysis and publication of the results. Due to cost and time constraints inventories are generally carried out using sampling techniques. The general principle of sampling is to select a subset from a population and draw inferences from the sample to the entire population. The selection of the most appropriate sampling design is subject to several considerations (more details can be found in the Tools section of this module). Two basic considerations involve whether the objective is to set up a monitoring system (repeated measurements over time) and whether auxiliary information (i.e. aerial or satellite imageries) is available or not. The main factors determining the overall methodology are the purpose and the scale of the inventory.
    [Show full text]