DOCSLIB.ORG

See Council Bill Number 115422, Ordinance 121999, Record Series

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Seattle, Washington, Council Bill Number 115422, Ordinance 121999 Record Series 1801-02, Seattle Municipal Activities http://clerk.ci.seattle.wa.us/~scripts/nph-brs.exe?s1=&s2=alcoholic-beverage- control&s3=&s4=&s5=&Sect4=and&l=20&Sect2=THESON&Sect3=PLURON&Sect5=CBOR 1&Sect6=HITOFF&d=CBOR&p=1&u=%2F%7Epublic%2Fcbor1.htm&r=1&f=G (Accessed on 11/17/09) Council Bill Number: 115442 Ordinance Number: 121999 AN ORDINANCE directing the Department of Neighborhoods and the Chief of Police to request that the Washington State Liquor Control Board recognize and impose restrictions on sales of alcohol in the Central Core and North Alcohol Impact Areas. Date introduced/referred: November 14, 2005 Date passed: December 12, 2005 Status: Passed Vote: 8-1 (No: McIver) Date of Mayor's signature: December 15, 2005 (about the signature date) Committee: Housing, Human Services & Health Sponsor: RASMUSSEN Index Terms: ALCOHOLIC-BEVERAGE-CONTROL, DOWNTOWN, CENTRAL- WATERFRONT, CAPITOL-HILL, CENTRAL-AREA, INTERNATIONAL-DISTRICT, RAINIER-VALLEY, UNIVERSITY-DISTRICT, CASCADE, MANN, MINOR, FIRST-HILL, QUEEN-ANNE, PIONEER-SQUARE, WALLINGFORD Text AN ORDINANCE directing the Department of Neighborhoods and the Chief of Police to request that the Washington State Liquor Control Board recognize and impose restrictions on sales of alcohol in the Central Core and North Alcohol Impact Areas. WHEREAS, Section 314-12-215 of the Washington Administrative Code ("WAC") provides that as a condition precedent to the City requesting that the Washington State Liquor Control Board enact additional restrictions on off-premises alcohol sales within an area of the city adversely affected by chronic public inebriation or illegal activity associated with alcohol sales or consumption, an ordinance must designate such an area as an Alcohol Impact Area; and WHEREAS, WAC 314-12-215 also provides that efforts to implement voluntary agreements with liquor licensees regarding business practices designed to reduce the effects of chronic public inebriation within an alcohol impact area must be attempted for at least six months before seeking regulatory restrictions from the State Liquor Control Board; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 121487 created the Central Core Alcohol Impact Area and the North Alcohol Impact Area Impact Area, and directed the Department of Neighborhoods and the Seattle Police Department to report to the Council on the success or failure of voluntary efforts to address chronic public inebriation in those areas; and WHEREAS, the Department of Neighborhoods and the Seattle Police Department have submitted the report required by Ordinance 121487; and WHEREAS, if the Washington State Liquor Control Board imposes restrictions as requested in this ordinance, the Council intends that the City evaluate the effects of the restrictions on chronic public inebriation and illegal activity associated with alcohol sales or consumption, ideally in cooperation with the Liquor Control Board; and WHEREAS, the evaluation of the effects of the restrictions should use the best feasible and affordable scientific methods, should include an analysis of secondary data and a systematic survey of public perceptions of chronic public inebriation and illegal activity associated with alcohol sales or consumption, should compare secondary data and public perceptions before the restrictions are imposed and twelve to eighteen months after they are imposed, and should compare the Central Core and North Alcohol Impact Areas to neighborhoods adjacent to these areas and to the rest of the city, and provide a report from the evaluation to the Housing, Human Services and Health Committee; and WHEREAS, the Council requests the Department of Neighborhoods and Police Department to present a plan for evaluating the restrictions before the restrictions are imposed; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SEATTLE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. A. In Ordinance 121487, the Council created the Central Core Alcohol Impact Area and the North Alcohol Impact Area and directed that voluntary efforts to reduce the impacts of chronic public inebriation in these areas be attempted and that a report on such efforts be submitted to the Council. B. Over the past several years the City and community groups have sought to reduce the problems associated with chronic public inebriation in the Central Core Alcohol Impact Area and the North Alcohol Impact Area including seeking voluntary changes in the business practices of liquor licensees in order to reduce alcohol sales to chronic inebriates. C. After adoption of Ordinance 121487, all off-premises liquor licensees in the areas were notified of the problems of chronic public inebriation in the areas and were requested to agree to certain alcohol product restrictions designed to reduce chronic public inebriation and improve the public health and safety in the areas. The voluntary restrictions requested were the cessation of sales of specific low cost/high alcohol content beer and wine products. D. Residents, business owners and community organizations in neighborhoods of the City within the Central Core Alcohol Impact Area and the North Alcohol Impact Area, including the International District, Capitol Hill, Judkins Park, Belltown, the University District have continued to appeal to the City for relief from the adverse effects of chronic public inebriation and illegal activity associated with alcohol sales and consumption in the Central Core Alcohol Impact Area and the North Alcohol Impact Area and have requested that the Council enact an ordinance authorizing the City to request the Washington State Liquor Board to impose restrictions on alcohol sales in the area. E. Chronic public inebriation and illegal activities associated with alcohol sales and consumption within the Central Core Alcohol Impact Area and the North Alcohol Impact Area, as demonstrated by relevant crime statistics, police reports, emergency response data, detox reports, sanitation reports, public health records, and other information contained in Attachment A, continue to contribute to the deterioration of the general quality of life within the area and threaten the welfare, health, peace, and safety of the areas' visitors and occupants. F. Despite the best efforts by the City and community groups over a period of more than a year since the passage of Ordinance 121487, attempts to obtain voluntary restrictions on off-premises sales of alcohol in the Central Core Alcohol Impact Area and the North Alcohol Impact Area have failed. Because only 30% of the off- premises liquor licensees in these areas participated in these voluntary efforts, the low cost/high alcohol content alcohol products have continued to be available throughout the areas. Thus, the City should request that restrictions on the sales of alcohol by off- premises liquor licensees in these areas should be imposed by the Washington State Liquor Control Board. Section 2. Request to Washington State Liquor Control Board The Department of Neighborhoods and the Chief of Police shall request the Washington State Liquor Control Board to recognize the Central Core Alcohol Impact Area and the North Alcohol Impact Area created by Ordinance 121487 and to impose restrictions on the sale of the low cost/high alcohol products as set forth in Attachment B. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its approval by the Mayor, but if not approved and returned by the Mayor within ten (10) days after presentation, it shall take effect as provided by Municipal Code Section 1.04.020. Passed by the City Council the ____ day of _________, 20__, and signed by me in open session in authentication of its passage this _____ day of __________, 20__. _________________________________ President __________of the City Council Approved by me this ____ day of _________, 20__. _________________________________ Gregory J. Nickels, Mayor Filed by me this ____ day of _________, 20__. ____________________________________ City Clerk Attachment A: Alcohol Impact Areas Update and Next Steps (Power Point) Attachment B: Good Neighbor Agreement with Map 12/12/05 (Ver. 5) ta Attachment A: Central Core and North AIA Data (PowerPoint File) Attachment A Attachment B: Good Neighbor Agreement with Map (PDF File) Attachment B (Map) (Ver. 2a) Good Neighbor Agreement City of Seattle, Neighborhood Organization, and Licensee Licensee: ________________________, agrees to join in efforts to reduce crime and nuisance activities associated with chronic public inebriation occurring in our community. Therefore, the undersigned business agrees to participate with the City of Seattle, neighborhood and community organizations, and other liquor licensees in the area in a public health and safety initiative to reduce the negative effects of chronic public inebriation and to promote public safety, health, livability and economic vitality in our neighborhoods. To these ends, the undersigned business agrees to: 1. Eliminate off-premises sales of alcohol products identified in the attached product list. The City of Seattle and the neighborhood organization named below will take reasonable efforts to convince all businesses within the Alcohol Impact Area, which have an off-premises liquor license, to enter into Good Neighbor Agreements containing the same restrictions on the off-premises sale of alcohol which are included in this agreement. Name of Business: ____________________________________ Date:______________ Owner/Manager Name____________________________________
Recommended publications
  • Crc - Liquor List

    Crc - Liquor List

    2701 W Howard Street Chicago, IL 60645-1303 PH: 773.465.3900 Fax: 773.465.6632 Rabbi Sholem Fishbane Kashruth Administrator Items listed as "Recommended" do not require a kosher symbol unless they are marked with a star (*) This list is updated regularly and should be considered accurate until December 31, 2013 cRc - Liquor List Bar Stock Items Bar Stock Items Bar equipment (strainers, shot measures, blenders, stir Other rods, shakers, etc.) used with non-kosher products Olives - Green should be properly cleaned and/or kashered prior to Require Certification use with kosher products. Onions - Pearl Canned or jarred require certification Recommended Coco Lopez OU* Beer Daily's OU* All unflavored beers with no additives are acceptable, OU* Holland House even without Kosher certification. This applies to both Jamaica John cRc* American and imported beers, light, dark and non- Jero OK* alcoholic beers. Mr & Mrs T OU or OK* Many breweries produce specialty brews that have Rose's - Grenadine OU* additives; please check the label and do not assume Rose's - Lime OU* that all varieties are acceptable. Furthermore, beers known to be produced at microbreweries, pub K* Tabasco - Hot Pepper Sauce breweries, or craft breweries require certification. Underberg - Herb Mix for Underberg OU* Natural Herb Bitters Recommended Other 800 - Ice Beer OU Bitters Anheuser-Busch - Redbridge Gluten Require Certification Free Coconut Milk Aspen Edge - Lager OU Requires Certification Blue Moon - Belgian White Ale OU* Cream of Coconut Blue Moon - Full Moon Winter Ale
  • Camyreport-Radio Daze

    Camyreport-Radio Daze

    RADIO DAZE: Alcohol Ads Tune in Underage Youth Executive Summary Through the years and every passing fad, advertising in 2001 and 2002 and to • Youth heard substantially less radio radio has continued to be a basic fact of conduct a case study of alcohol radio advertising for wine. Ads for wine life for youth in the United States. advertising in December 2002 and were overwhelmingly more effective- Consider this: 99.2% of teenagers January 2003 to validate the audit find- ly delivered to adults than to youth, (defined as ages 12-17) listen to radio ings. In analyzing the results of the audit showing how advertisers can target an every week—a higher percentage than and case study, the Center finds that the adult audience without overexposing for any other age group—and 80.6% lis- alcohol industry routinely overexposed youth. ten to radio every day.1 Over the course youth5 to its radio advertising by placing • Alcohol ads were placed on sta- of a week, the average teenager will listen the ads when and where youth were tions with “youth” formats. to 13.5 hours of radio.2 By comparison, more likely than adults to hear them. Seventy-three percent of the alcohol he or she will spend 10.6 hours per week radio advertising in terms of gross watching television, 7.6 hours online, In analyzing the sample from 2001- ratings points (GRPs) 7 was on four and 3.3 hours reading magazines for 2002, the Center specifically finds: formats —Rhythmic Contemporary pleasure.3 For African-American and Hit, Pop Contemporary Hit, Urban Hispanic teenagers, radio’s influence is • Youth heard more radio ads for Contemporary and Alternative— even more impressive, with average teens beer, “malternatives” and distilled that routinely have a listening audi- listening for 18.25 and 17.75 hours a spirits.
  • US V. Anheuser-Busch Inbev SA/NV and Sabmiller

    US V. Anheuser-Busch Inbev SA/NV and Sabmiller

    Case 1:16-cv-01483 Document 2-2 Filed 07/20/16 Page 1 of 38 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. ANHEUSER-BUSCH InBEV SA/NV, and SABMILLER plc, Defendants. PROPOSED FINAL JUDGMENT WHEREAS, Plaintiff, United States of America (“United States”) filed its Complaint on July 20, 2016, the United States and Defendants, by their respective attorneys, have consented to entry of this Final Judgment without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and without this Final Judgment constituting any evidence against or admission by any party regarding any issue of fact or law; AND WHEREAS, Defendants agree to be bound by the provisions of the Final Judgment pending its approval by the Court; AND WHEREAS, the essence of this Final Judgment is the prompt divestiture of certain rights and assets to assure that competition is not substantially lessened; AND WHEREAS, this Final Judgment requires Defendant ABI to make certain divestitures for the purpose of remedying the loss of competition alleged in the Complaint; Case 1:16-cv-01483 Document 2-2 Filed 07/20/16 Page 2 of 38 AND WHEREAS, Plaintiff requires Defendants to agree to undertake certain actions and refrain from certain conduct for the purposes of remedying the loss of competition alleged in the Complaint; AND WHEREAS, Defendants have represented to the United States that the divestitures required below can (after the Completion of the Transaction) and will be made, and that the actions and conduct restrictions can and will be undertaken, and that Defendants will later raise no claim of hardship or difficulty as grounds for asking the Court to modify any of the provisions contained below; NOW THEREFORE, before any testimony is taken, without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and upon consent of the parties, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: I.
  • Brand Calories Per Serving Pure Ethanol Not a Real Drink, For

    Brand Calories Per Serving Pure Ethanol Not a Real Drink, For

    ABV Brand Alcohol % Calories by Volume Per Serving Pure Ethanol 100% 238 calories per 1.5 oz Not a real drink, for comparison only Everclear 95% 226 calories per 1.5 oz Jose Cuervo Especial (Gold) 40% 96 calories per 1.5 oz Jose Cuervo Especial (Silver) 40% 96 calories per 1.5 oz Crown Royal - Special Reserve 40% 96 calories per 1.5 oz Knob Creek Bourbon 50% 120 calories per 1.5 oz Don Julio Blanco Tequila 40% 96 calories per 1.5 oz Ketel One Vodka 40% 96 calories per 1.5 oz Myers Original Dark Rum 40% 96 calories per 1.5 oz Pendleton Whisky 40% 96 calories per 1.5 oz Monarch Citron Vodka 35% 84 calories per 1.5 oz Smirnoff Vodka Blue Label 100 Proof 50% 121 calories per 1.5 oz Bulleit Rye 45% 109 calories per 1.5 oz Bulleit Bourbon 45% 109 calories per 1.5 oz Makers Mark 45.5% 110 calories per 1.5 oz Bacardi 151 Rum 75.5% 183 calories per 1.5 oz Vodka and Diet Coke 13.3% 258 calories per 12 oz Smirnoff Vodka Red Label 80 Proof 40% 97 calories per 1.5 oz Vodka - Royal Gate (generic) 80 proof 40% 97 calories per 1.5 oz Grey Goose Vodka 40% 97 calories per 1.5 oz 1910 Rye Whisky 40% 97 calories per 1.5 oz Bombay Sapphire Gin 47% 114 calories per 1.5 oz E&J Brandy 40% 97 calories per 1.5 oz Smirnoff Vodka Silver Label 90 Proof 45.2% 110 calories per 1.5 oz Bacardi Gold Rum 40% 98 calories per 1.5 oz Jack Daniels Whiskey 40% 98 calories per 1.5 oz Jack and Diet Coke 10% 195 calories per 12 oz Dalwhinnie Scotch Whisky 57.8% 141 calories per 1.5 oz Patron Anejo Tequila 40% 98 calories per 1.5 oz Patron Gran Patron Burdeos Anejo 40% 98 calories
  • Miller Brewing Company :: Miller Unveils Soldier Recognition Program, 'Miller Unsung Heroes,' with Stars & Stripes Newspaper

    Miller Brewing Company :: Miller Unveils Soldier Recognition Program, 'Miller Unsung Heroes,' with Stars & Stripes Newspaper

    Miller Brewing Company :: Miller Unveils Soldier Recognition Program, 'Miller Unsung Heroes,' With Stars & Stripes Newspaper Miller Unveils Soldier Recognition Program, 'Miller Unsung Heroes,' With Stars & Stripes Newspaper -- Sgt. Brian Horn Brown of LaPlata, Maryland Selected as First Award Recipient -- MILWAUKEE, June 9 /PRNewswire/ -- As part of Miller Brewing Company's 150th Anniversary Celebration, and our continuing efforts to support our military personnel, the company has unveiled a "Miller Unsung Heroes" program with Stars and Stripes newspaper. The program was launched through a full-page ad in the May 15th edition of Stars & Stripes in Europe, the Pacific and the Middle East. The aim of the program is to recognize military personnel who go beyond the call of duty every day, often with little or no recognition. Therefore, each month, beginning in June, Miller Brewing Company will recognize an active serviceperson with the "Miller Unsung Hero Award". The recipient will be recognized with a full-page biography detailing the person's achievements. The program will culminate in January with the selection of the "Miller Unsung Hero of the Year" award and celebrate the recipient's contributions with a full-page story in Stars & Stripes and Timeout Sports Magazine. In addition, each "Miller Unsung Hero of the Month" and "Miller Unsung Hero of the Year" awardee will receive an exciting award package from Miller expressing the company's gratitude for their contributions, commitment to excellence, and service to our country as a proud member of our U.S. Military. "The purpose of this program is to celebrate those untold stories of valor, commitment and pride of our military members," said Victor Chua, Vice President of Miller International.
  • Brand Nutritional Data Values Are Average and Approximate and Are Based on a Standard Serving Size of 12 Oz

    Brand Nutritional Data Values Are Average and Approximate and Are Based on a Standard Serving Size of 12 Oz

    Revised 05/28/2019 Brand Nutritional Data Values are average and approximate and are based on a standard serving size of 12 oz. Our products contain no Fat, Cholesterol, or High Fructose Corn Syrup Brand Brand Style Ingredients ABV Total Calories Fat Total (grams) Calories Fat from Saturated Fat (grams) Trans Fat (grams) Cholesterol (mg) Sodium (mg) Total Carbohydrates (grams) Fiber (grams) Sugars (grams) Protein (grams) International Water, Barley Malt, Yeast, Hops, Rice, Aguila 3.9 126 0 0 0 0 0 10 13.7 0 2 1.0 Pale Lager Sugar Flavored Arnold Palmer Malt 5.0 206 0 0 0 0 0 5 28.3 0 26 < 1.0 Ingredient list to come Spiked Half & Half Beverage German- Barmen 5.0 156 0 0 0 0 0 20 12.9 0 0 1.9 Water, Barley Malt, Yeast, Hops Style Pilsner Pre- Water, Barley Malt, Corn Syrup (Dextrose Batch 19 Prohibition 5.5 174 0 0 0 0 0 15 15.0 0 0 1.6 – not High-Fructose Corn Syrup), Hops, Style Lager Yeast Blue Moon Belgian Belgian-Style Water, Barley Malt, Wheat, Yeast, Hop 5.4 168 0 0 0 0 0 10 14.1 0 0 1.9 White Wheat Ale Extract, Oats, Orange Peel, Coriander Water, Barley Malt, Oats, Corn Syrup Blue Moon Oatmeal (Maltose – not High-Fructose Corn Cappuccino Oatmeal 5.9 196 0 0 0 0 0 10 18.8 0 1 1.8 Stout Syrup), Cocoa, Hops, Yeast, Stout Decaffeinated Coffee, Sucrose Blue Moon Harvest Herb & Spice Water, Barley Malt, Wheat, Yeast, Hops, 5.7 180 0 0 0 0 0 10 15.5 0 1 2.0 Pumpkin Wheat Beer Sucrose, Pumpkin, Spices Water, Barley Malt, Wheat, Corn Syrup Blue Moon Honey American 5.2 153 0 0 0 0 0 10 11.7 0 3 1.4 (Dextrose – not High-Fructose Corn Wheat

  • Bière : Les Quatre Multinationales Qui Se Cachent Derrière Des Centaines De Marques

    Bière : les quatre multinationales qui se cachent derrière des centaines de marques Le Monde.fr | 08.10.2015 à 14h21 • Mis à jour le 08.10.2015 à 17h31 | Par Mathilde Damgé (/journaliste/mathilde- damge/) A l’image de Munich, capitale allemande de la bière, Paris a décidé d’organiser sa première Oktoberfest, qui commence jeudi 8 octobre. Une opération très « marketing » (avec un prix d’entrée à 35 euros), à l’image d’un marché très concentré en dépit des centaines de marques proposées dans les bars, restaurants et grandes surfaces aux quatre coins de la planète . Et la tendance à la concentration pourrait s’accélérer : le numéro deux mondial de la bière SABMiller a rejeté mercredi une nouvelle offre d’achat de plus de 90 milliards d’euros présentée par son rival, le numéro un AB InBev, visant à créer un mastodonte du secteur mariant la Stella Artois et la Pilsner Urquell. Lire aussi : SABMiller rejette l’offre à 92 milliards d’euros du géant de la bière AB InBev (/entreprises/article/2015/10/07/brasseurs-ab-inbev-releve-son-offre-d-achat-sur- sabmiller_4783951_1656994.html) Les quatre leaders mondiaux, AB InBev, suivi de SABMiller, de Heineken et de Carlsberg, brassent près de la moitié de la bière mondiale et exploitent près de 800 marques à eux seuls. Ci-dessous, les marques exploitées par le néerlandais Heineken (18,4 milliards d’euros de chiffre d’affaires en 2012), le belge Anheuser-Busch InBev (29 milliards d’euros de chiffre d’affaires en 2012), le britannique SABMiller (25,42 milliards d’euros de chiffre d’affaires en 2012) et le danois Carlsberg (9 milliards d’euros de chiffre d’affaires en 2012).
  • Brand Nutritional Data Values Are Average and Approximate and Are Based on a Standard Serving Size of 12 Oz

    Brand Nutritional Data Values Are Average and Approximate and Are Based on a Standard Serving Size of 12 Oz

    Revised 2/4/2019 Brand Nutritional Data Values are average and approximate and are based on a standard serving size of 12 oz. Our products contain no fat, cholesterol or high-fructose corn syrup. Brand Brand Style Ingredients ABV Total Calories Fat Total (grams) Calories Fat from Saturated Fat (grams) Trans Fat (grams) Cholesterol (mg) Sodium (mg) Total Carbohydrates (grams) Fiber (grams) Sugars (grams) Protein (grams) International Water, Barley Malt, Yeast, Hops, Rice, Aguila 3.9 126 0 0 0 0 0 10 13.7 0 2 1.0 Pale Lager Sugar Flavored Arnold Palmer Malt 5.0 206 0 0 0 0 0 5 28.3 0 26 < 1.0 Full ingredient list to come. Spiked Half & Half Beverage German- Barmen 5.0 156 0 0 0 0 0 20 12.9 0 0 1.9 Water, Barley Malt, Yeast, Hops Style Pilsner Blue Moon Belgian Belgian-Style Water, Barley Malt, Wheat, Yeast, Hop 5.4 168 0 0 0 0 0 10 14.1 0 0 1.9 White Wheat Ale Extract, Oats, Orange Peel, Coriander Water, Barley Malt, Oats, Corn Syrup Blue Moon Oatmeal (Maltose – not High-Fructose Corn Cappuccino Oatmeal 5.9 196 0 0 0 0 0 10 18.8 0 1 1.8 Stout Syrup), Cocoa, Hops, Yeast, Stout Decaffeinated Coffee, Sucrose Blue Moon Harvest Herb & Spice Water, Barley Malt, Wheat, Yeast, Hops, 5.7 180 0 0 0 0 0 10 15.5 0 1 2.0 Pumpkin Wheat Beer Sucrose, Pumpkin, Spices Blue Moon Mango Water, Barley Malt, Wheat, Mango, Fruit Beer 5.4 175 0 0 0 0 0 10 15.7 0 2 2.1 Wheat Yeast, Hops, Honey, Natural Flavor Water, Barley Malt, Wheat, Apricot, Blue Moon Pacific Fruit Beer 5.6 178 0 0 0 0 0 10 16.4 0 1 1.2 Yeast, Hops, Cardamom, Hop Extract, Apricot Wheat Lactic
  • 1996 Winners List

    1996 Winners List

    BREWERS ASSOCIATION PRESENTS World Beer Cup® 1996 Winners List Category 1: Classic English-Style Pale Ale - 12 Entries Category 26: South German-Style Dunkel Weizen/Dunkel Weissbier - 4 Entries Silver: Pullman Pale Ale 0 Riverside Brewing Co. - Riverside, CA USA Gold: Edelweiss Dunkel - Österreichische Bräu-Aktiengesellschaft - Linz, Austria - (Imported by Bronze: Doggie Style Ale - Broadway Brewing LLC - Denver, CO USA Pa’s Bier Inc./USA) Silver: Paulaner Dunkel Weizen - Paulaner - Munich, Germany - (Imported by Paulaner North Category 2: India Pale Ale - 26 Entries America/USA) Gold: Wet Mountain India Pale Ale - Il Vicino - Salida, CO USA Silver: Blind Pig India Pale Ale - Blind Pig Brewing Co. - Temecula, CA USA Category 27: South German-Style Weizenbock/Weissbock - 2 Entries Bronze: Avery India Pale Ale - Avery Brewing Co. - Boulder, CO USA Gold: Aventinus - Private Weissbierbrauere G. Schneider & Sohn K.G. - Munich, Germany - (Im- ported by G. Schneider & Sohn/USA) Category 3: English-Style Ordinary Bitter - 2 Entries Bronze: Wild Pitch Weizen Bock - Sandlot Brewery at Coors Field - Denver, CO USA Gold: Ruddles Best Bitter - Ruddles Brewery - Rutland, United Kingdom Bronze: Boddington’s Bitter - Boddington’s Brewery - Manchester, England - (Imported by LaBatt Category 28: Belgian-Style Flanders/Oud Bruin Ales - 2 Entries USA/InterBrew) Gold: Liefmans Goudenband - Brouwerij Liefmans - Oudenaarde, Belgium - (Imported by Brewery Riva NV/USA) Category 4: English-Style (Special) Best Bitter - 3 Entries Bronze: Solstice Mystery Ale - Palmer Lake Brewing Co. - Palmer Lake, CO USA Gold: Delaney’s Ale - South China Brewing Co. Ltd. - Aberdeen, Hong Kong Silver: Galena E.S.B. - Sun Valley Brewing Co. - Hailey, ID USA Category 29: Belgian-Style Abbey Ale - 9 Entries Silver: Abbey Belgian Style Ale - New Belgium Brewing Co.
  • Proposed Banned Products List City of Olympia Downtown Urban Core Alcohol Impact Area (Changes to Current List Underlined)

    Proposed Banned Products List City of Olympia Downtown Urban Core Alcohol Impact Area (Changes to Current List Underlined)

    Proposed Banned Products List City of Olympia Downtown Urban Core Alcohol Impact Area (Changes To Current List Underlined) Manufacturer Brand Name Alcohol Content by Volume Bacardi Bacardi+ - All Flavors 35% Pabst Brewing Co. Big Bear 7.5% Pabst Brewing Co. Blast by Colt 45 – All Flavors 8% - 12% E&J Gallo Winery Boone’s Farm – All Flavors 7.5% Anheuser Busch Bud Light Lime-A-Rita 8% Pabst Brewing Co. Bull Ice 8.2% Anheuser Busch Busch Ice 5.9% Camo Brewing Co. Camo – All Flavors 6.3% - 10.7% Cisco Wine Co. Cisco – All Flavors 13.5% - 20% G Heileman Brewing Co. Colt 45 – All Flavors 6.1% - 8.5% Charge Beverage Co. Core – All Flavors 6.9% - 12% Rock Wall Brewing Co. Dog Bite 8% - 10% Drink Four Brewing Co. Earthquake – All Flavors 8.1% Drink Four Brewing Co. Four Loko – All Flavors 12% Drink Four Brewing Co. Four Max 10% Premium Blend Co. Gino’s Premium Blend 14% Pabst Brewing Co. Hamm’s Ice Brewed Ale 5.8% Hard Wired Brewing Hard Wired 6.9% Five Star Brewing Co. High Gravity – All Flavors 8.1% - 9% Anheuser Busch Hurricane – All Flavors 5.9% - 12% Anheuser Busch Hurricane High Gravity 8.1% Miller Brewing Co. Ice House 5.5% Heublein Jeremiah Weed Lemonade 5.8% United Brands Co. Joose – All Products 9.9% Coors Brewing Co. Keystone Ice 5.9% Anheuser Busch King Cobra 6% Labatt Brewing Co. Labatt Maximum Ice 7.1% Charge Beverage Co. Liquid Charge – All Flavors 6.9% General Brewing Co. Lucky Ice Ale Premium 6.1% General Brewing Co.

  • Entire Bulletin

    Volume 33 Number 3 Saturday, January 18, 2003 • Harrisburg, Pa. Pages 333—524 Agencies in this issue: The General Assembly The Courts Commission on Crime and Delinquency Department of Banking Department of Education Department of Environmental Protection Department of General Services Department of Health Department of Labor and Industry Department of Public Welfare Department of Transportation Housing Finance Agency Insurance Department Legislative Reference Bureau Liquor Control Board Milk Marketing Board Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Public School Employees’ Retirement Board State Board of Certified Real Estate Appraisers Detailed list of contents appears inside. PRINTED ON 100% RECYCLED PAPER Latest Pennsylvania Code Reporter (Master Transmittal Sheet): No. 338, January 2003 published weekly by Fry Communications, Inc. for the PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Legislative Reference Bu- reau, 647 Main Capitol Building, State & Third Streets, (ISSN 0162-2137) Harrisburg, Pa. 17120, under the policy supervision and direction of the Joint Committee on Documents pursuant to Part II of Title 45 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes (relating to publication and effectiveness of Com- monwealth Documents). Subscription rate $82.00 per year, postpaid to points in the United States. Individual copies $2.50. Checks for subscriptions and individual copies should be made payable to ‘‘Fry Communications, Inc.’’ Postmaster send address changes to: Periodicals postage paid at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Orders for subscriptions and other circulation matters FRY COMMUNICATIONS should be sent to: Attn: Pennsylvania Bulletin 800 W. Church Rd. Fry Communications, Inc. Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania 17055-3198 Attn: Pennsylvania Bulletin (717) 766-0211 ext. 2340 800 W. Church Rd. (800) 334-1429 ext. 2340 (toll free, out-of-State) Mechanicsburg, PA 17055-3198 (800) 524-3232 ext.
  • Západočeská Univerzita V Plzni Fakulta

    Západočeská Univerzita V Plzni Fakulta

    ZÁPADOČESKÁ UNIVERZITA V PLZNI FAKULTA EKONOMICKÁ Bakalá řská práce Efektivní nákup podniku Effective purchase Petr Št ěpán Cheb 2013 - 1 - Čestné prohlášení Prohlašuji, že jsem bakalá řskou práci na téma „Efektivní nákup podniku“ vypracoval samostatn ě pod odborným dohledem vedoucího bakalá řské práce za použití pramen ů uvedených v přiložené bibliografii. V Chebu, dne …………………………….. podpis autora - 3 - Pod ěkování Touto cestou bych rád pod ěkoval vedoucímu práce panu Dr. Ing. Ji římu Hofmanovi za odborné vedení, poskytnutí cenných rad a komentá řů p ři zpracování mé bakalá řské práce. Dále bych rád pod ěkoval zam ěstnanc ům spole čnosti Plze ňský Prazdroj, a.s. za umožn ění zpracování bakalá řské práce. - 4 - Obsah Úvod ............................................................................................................................ - 7 - 1 Charakteristika podniku Plze ňský Prazdroj, a.s............................................. - 8 - 1.1 Historie podniku od založení do sou časnosti .................................................... - 8 - 1.2 Sou časnost podniku Plze ňský Prazdroj, a.s. ................................................... - 10 - 1.3 Portfolio produkt ů ........................................................................................... - 11 - 1.4 Export .............................................................................................................. - 13 - 1.5 Produkce piva v letech 2007-2012 .................................................................. - 14 - 1.6 Zam ěstnanci ...................................................................................................