Transforming Young Lives Across Wales: the Economic Argument for Investing in Early Years

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Transforming Young Lives Across Wales: the Economic Argument for Investing in Early Years Transforming Young Lives across Wales: The Economic Argument for Investing in Early Years Professor Rhiannon Tudor Edwards Lucy Bryning Huw Lloyd-Williams 1 Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Public Health Wales for commissioning this report and to Professor Mark Bellis, Director of Policy, Research and International Development and Dr Alisha Davies, Head of Research and Development at Public Health Wales who have assisted in the co-production of this report. We would like to acknowledge the support of our colleagues at CHEME, particularly Alison Shaw for providing reading support and Jacqueline Williams-Bulkeley, Eira Winrow and Dr Carys Jones for providing research support. We would like to acknowledge the reviewers who provided feedback on a draft of our report: • Professor John Ashton, Former President of the Faculty of Public Health • Professor Brian Ferguson, Chief Economist, & Dr Helen Duncan, Public Health England • Professor Judy Hutchings, Centre for Evidence Based Early Intervention, Bangor University • Professor Tracey Bywater, Professor of Family Wellbeing at the Department of Health Sciences at University of York • Dr Julie Bishop, Public Health Wales We acknowledge associates who advised us: Mr Steve Aos, former Director of the Washington State Institute for Public Policy; Mr Jonathan Price, Chief Economist for Wales; Professor Shantini Paranjothy, Institute of Primary Care & Public Health, Cardiff University; and Professor Val Morrison, School of Psychology, Bangor University. Supported by funding from Public Health Wales Public Health Wales is an NHS organisation providing professionally independent public health advice and services to protect and improve the health and wellbeing of the population of Wales. Public Health Wales is an NHS organisation providing professionally independent public health advice and services to protect and improve the health and wellbeing of the population of Wales. Production of this report was funded by Public Health Wales. However, the views in this report are entirely those of the authors and should not be assumed to be the same as those of Public Health Wales. We would also like to acknowledge the support of Dr Christopher Johnson, Specialty Registrar in Public Health, who in addition to providing comments on a draft report, conducted a programme budget exercise as part of an academic placement at CHEME under the supervision of Professor Edwards. The Early Years programme budget is available as a supplementary document to this report on request to [email protected], 01248 382153. We would like to thank the children and staff from our local day-care and child research centre, Tir na n-Og, for providing us with some fantastic drawings and taking part in our hand print project. Tir na n-Og is for children from birth to age 4 and provides an environment for children to be free to explore, learn and play. We have displayed a number of the paintings and drawings throughout our report. Graphic design by Excellent Creative • www.excellentcreative.co.uk 2 Contents Foreword .................................................................................................................................4 Preface ....................................................................................................................................5 Terms of Reference ................................................................................................................6 About the Authors ..................................................................................................................7 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................9 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................15 1.1. The case for investment in Early Years ......................................................................16 1.2. Why focus on Early Years? The 1000 days window ..................................................17 1.3. Exploring the economic case for investment in Early Years ......................................20 1.4. What methodology is appropriate for economic evaluation in public health? ..........21 1.5. The economy and how the population of Wales is changing ....................................25 1.6. Addressing inequalities in life chances for children living in Wales ...........................28 1.7. What about an asset based approach to public health? ...........................................32 2. Investing in babies and children living in Wales ............................................................35 2.1. Preconception, pregnancy and first year of life .........................................................36 2.2. Planned pregnancy ....................................................................................................37 2.3. Low birthweight ........................................................................................................38 2.4. Breastfeeding ............................................................................................................39 2.5. Early Years immunisation in Wales ............................................................................43 2.6. A spotlight on looked after children ..........................................................................44 3. Investing in the whole family ...........................................................................................45 3.1. Parenting ...................................................................................................................46 3.2. Joined up services and systems for families living in Wales .....................................50 3.3. Adverse Childhood Experiences ...............................................................................54 3.4. Youth offending ..........................................................................................................56 4. Investing in education and skills ....................................................................................61 4.1. Early Years childcare and access to pre-school ........................................................62 4.2. Primary school ...........................................................................................................67 5. Investing in a child’s environment and wider community ............................................71 5.1. Housing for families with young children ...................................................................72 5.2. Accidents in childhood ..............................................................................................74 5.3. Community spaces, parks and playgrounds .............................................................76 5.4. Asset based community development ......................................................................78 6. Potential economic benefits from investment in Early Years ......................................79 6.1. Some lessons from Greater Manchester ...................................................................80 6.2. Who currently pays for children’s service in Wales? .................................................82 6.3. What returns could we expect from additional spending on Early Years in Wales? .83 7. Discussion ........................................................................................................................85 Glossary ................................................................................................................................90 References ............................................................................................................................92 3 Foreword by Professor John R Ashton C.B.E. This report from the Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation at Bangor University is a major contribution to our understanding of how best to protect and improve the health of our children in the twenty first century. It is relevant not only to the next generation coming through , but also to those of us who are entering the second half of the second half of our journey if we are to have a quality of life in our final years. It is also of international relevance beyond the developed world. In Wales over the next 20 years, the population aged over 65 will increase by 50%, whilst the population of children entering the workforce will continue to decline. Not only will an ageing population produce ever more challenge to health and social care, but a reducing working age population will make it much more difficult to square the circle of caring, not least in an era of reductions in public sector finance. As Mao Tse Tung is reputed to have said ‘if the practice doesn’t work, the theory is wrong’, so we need a new approach. This careful, thorough and evidence based review from one of the UK’s strongest Health Economics centres provides us with such an approach. It is refreshing, comprehensive and creative. It takes us from a tired, if valuable, form of health service economics to a new and emerging discipline of Public Health Economics. Investment in the early years is not a luxury but an economic necessity and that a whole systems approach rather than a narrow, downstream medical approach is vital. An Asset Based Approach to Public health and economic and social development is the logical conclusion with a focus on the life course and a recognition of the intergenerational benefits.
Recommended publications
  • People, Places and Policy
    People, Places and Policy Set within the context of UK devolution and constitutional change, People, Places and Policy offers important and interesting insights into ‘place-making’ and ‘locality-making’ in contemporary Wales. Combining policy research with policy-maker and stakeholder interviews at various spatial scales (local, regional, national), it examines the historical processes and working practices that have produced the complex political geography of Wales. This book looks at the economic, social and political geographies of Wales, which in the context of devolution and public service governance are hotly debated. It offers a novel ‘new localities’ theoretical framework for capturing the dynamics of locality-making, to go beyond the obsession with boundaries and coterminous geog- raphies expressed by policy-makers and politicians. Three localities – Heads of the Valleys (north of Cardiff), central and west coast regions (Ceredigion, Pembrokeshire and the former district of Montgomeryshire in Powys) and the A55 corridor (from Wrexham to Holyhead) – are discussed in detail to illustrate this and also reveal the geographical tensions of devolution in contemporary Wales. This book is an original statement on the making of contemporary Wales from the Wales Institute of Social and Economic Research, Data and Methods (WISERD) researchers. It deploys a novel ‘new localities’ theoretical framework and innovative mapping techniques to represent spatial patterns in data. This allows the timely uncovering of both unbounded and fuzzy relational policy geographies, and the more bounded administrative concerns, which come together to produce and reproduce over time Wales’ regional geography. The Open Access version of this book, available at www.tandfebooks.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 3.0 license.
    [Show full text]
  • The Introduction of a Single-Use Carrier Bag Charge in Wales: Attitude Change and Behavioural Spillover Effects
    WSA Working Paper Series ISSN 2050-8522 The Introduction of a Single-Use Carrier Bag Charge in Wales: Attitude Change and Behavioural Spillover Effects Wouter Poortinga, Lorraine Whitmarsh and Christine Suffolk WSA Working Paper 01-2012 First published in December 2012 by the Welsh School of Architecture Welsh School of Architecture, Cardiff University Bute Building, King Edward VII Avenue Cardiff CF10 3NB, Wales, United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)29 2087 6097 Fax: +44 (0)29 2097 4623 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/archi/working_papers.php WSA Working Paper Series ISSN 2050-8522 Paper Number: 01-2012 The Introduction of a Single-Use Carrier Bag Charge in Wales: Attitude Change and Behavioural Spillover Effects Wouter Poortinga, Lorraine Whitmarsh and Christine Suffolk Email: [email protected] Disclaimer All opinions expressed in this working paper are those of the author(s) alone and should not be regarded as the views of the Welsh School of Architecture or of Cardiff University. The copyright is retained by the author(s). 2 Contents Contents ............................................................................................................................... 3 Abstract................................................................................................................................. 4 Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................. 4 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Sustainable Development and Children's Rights
    social sciences $€ £ ¥ Article Integrating Sustainable Development and Children’s Rights: A Case Study on Wales Rhian Croke 1,*, Helen Dale 2 , Ally Dunhill 3, Arwyn Roberts 2 , Malvika Unnithan 4 and Jane Williams 5 1 Hillary Rodham Clinton School of Law, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK 2 Lleisiau Bach/Little Voices, National Lottery People and Places Fund 2012-2020, Swansea and Bangor University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK; [email protected] (H.D.); [email protected] (A.R.) 3 Independent Consultant and Researcher, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 8TA, UK; [email protected] 4 Northumbria University Law School, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK; [email protected] 5 Observatory on the Human Rights of Children, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] Abstract: The global disconnect between the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Conven- tion on the Rights of the Child (CRC), has been described as ‘a missed opportunity’. Since devolution, the Welsh Government has actively pursued a ‘sustainable development’ and a ‘children’s rights’ agenda. However, until recently, these separate agendas also did not contribute to each other, al- though they culminated in two radical and innovative pieces of legislation; the Rights of Children and Young Persons (Wales) Measure (2013) and the Well-being and Future Generations (Wales) Act (2015). This article offers a case study that draws upon the SDGs and the CRC and considers how recent Citation: Croke, Rhian, Helen Dale, Ally Dunhill, Arwyn Roberts, guidance to Welsh public bodies for implementation attempts to contribute to a more integrated Malvika Unnithan, and Jane Williams.
    [Show full text]
  • Making a Difference: Investing in Sustainable Health and Well-Being for the People of Wales Supporting Evidence 2016 £ £ RIP
    £ £ Making a Difference: Investing in Sustainable Health and Well-being for the People of Wales Supporting Evidence 2016 £ £ RIP OL SCHO RIP RIP RIP Public Health Wales ISBN 978-1-910768-32-7 © 2016 Public Health Wales NHS Trust Material contained in this document may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Government Licence (OGL) www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/ provided it is done so accurately and is not used in a misleading context. Acknowledgement to Public Health Wales NHS Trust to be stated. Copyright in the typographical arrangement, design and layout belongs to Public Health Wales NHS Trust. Design: Jenney Creative www.jenneycreative.co.uk Making a Difference: Investing in Sustainable Health and Well-being for the People of Wales Contents Authors and Acknowledgments 2 Glossary 3 Introduction 5 Rationale 6 Methodology 8 Supporting Evidence 9 Building resilience across the life course and settings 1. Ensuring a good start in life for all 10 2. Promoting mental well-being and preventing mental ill health 14 3. Preventing violence and abuse 18 Addressing harmful behaviours and protecting health 4. Reducing the prevalence of smoking 23 5. Reducing the prevalence of alcohol and substance misuse 29 6. Promoting physical activity 35 7. Promoting healthy diet and preventing obesity 38 8. Protection from disease and early identification 43 Addressing wider economic, social and environmental determinants of health 9. Reducing economic and social inequalities 52 10. Ensuring safe and health promoting natural and built environments 57 References 61 Appendices 79 1 Public Health Wales Authors and Contributors The development of this report has been led by Mariana Dyakova*.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Agency Annual Report and Accounts 2005/06 HC 1420
    enhancing... improving... cleaning... restoring... changing... tackling... protecting... reducing... creating a better place... influencing... inspiring... advising... managing... adapting... Annual report and accounts 2005/2006 GEHO0706BLAX-E-P We are the Environment Agency. It’s our job to look after your environment and make it a better place – for you, and for future generations. Your environment is the air you breathe, the water you drink and the ground you walk on. Working with business, Government and society as a whole, we are making your environment cleaner and healthier. The Environment Agency. Out there, making your environment a better place. Published by: Environment Agency Rio House Waterside Drive, Aztec West Almondsbury, Bristol BS32 4UD Tel: 08708 506 506 Email: [email protected] www.environment-agency.gov.uk © Environment Agency All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. ISBN: 1844324559 Environment Agency Annual report and accounts 2005/06 Presented to Parliament pursuant to sections 46 and 52 of the Environment Act 1995 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 24 July 2006 HC 1420 London: The Stationery Office £16.65 Contents Page Section one - overview Chairman’s foreword 1 Management commentary 3 Section two – our achievements in 2005/06 How we performed against targets in our Corporate Plan Delivering environmental improvements for a better quality of life: An enhanced environment for wildlife 15 Cleaner air for everyone 19 Improved
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Probable Suicide Clusters in Wales Using National
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Identifying Probable Suicide Clusters in Wales Using National Mortality Data Citation for published version: Jones, P, Gunnell, D, Platt, S, Scourfield, J, Lloyd, K, Huxley, P, John, A, Kamran, B, Wells, C & Dennis, M 2013, 'Identifying Probable Suicide Clusters in Wales Using National Mortality Data', PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 8, e71713. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071713 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1371/journal.pone.0071713 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: PLoS ONE Publisher Rights Statement: Copyright: © 2012 Marioni et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and
    [Show full text]
  • Construction by Numbers October 2019 October 2019 Construction by Numbers Foreword
    Construction by numbers October 2019 October 2019 Construction by numbers Foreword Constructing Excellence Wales, which came into being to bring about positive change in the Welsh construction industry. The construction agenda remains challenging and requires a change of heart and minds to deliver improvement. Challenging the way in which the Construction Industry and other bodies in Wales currently behave - collaboration and innovation are key. If we are to see improvement in the Construction Industry, then accurate data will be key to monitoring change. How else will we know if change has delivered improvement? Indeed, taking a step back, how do we know the areas needing change if there is no evidence? With Brexit looming, it is timely to take stock of the current situation as it will also allow future comparison and analysis on the impact of Brexit and other initiatives. The data sets used here are those publicly available and published by the Office of National Statistics (ONS)1, primarily between 2009 and 2019 (but some are to early dates). There are a surprising number of data sets, with slightly differing methodology or approach. Our aim is to simplify them so at to make them meaningful to the industry. Don’t be surprised if some of the values don’t add up exactly, in order to protect against disclosure of personal information ONS slightly amend some of the information. Additionally, many tables round figures and have caveats; exceptions and methodology changes, which we have tried to work through to present a balanced report. This information is of a general nature and does not consider the specific objectives, commercial situation or particular needs of any particular group or person.
    [Show full text]
  • MJW 09 Wales Governance Centre.Pdf
    Y Pwyllgor Deddfwriaeth, Cyfiawnder a’r Cyfansoddiad / Legislation, Justice and Constitution Committee Gwneud i Gyfiawnder weithio yng Nghymru / Making Justice work in Wales MJW 09 Ymateb gan: Canolfan Llywodraethiant Cymru Response from: Wales Governance Centre Ymgynghoriad: Gwneud i Gyfiawnder weithio yng Nghymru Consultation: Making Justice work in Wales Ym mis Mawrth 2019, cyhoeddodd Canolfan Llywodraethiant Cymru Prifysgol Caerdydd yr adroddiad (wedi atodi) 'Justice at the Jagged Edge in Wales', gan Dr Robert Jones a’r Athro Richard Wyn Jones. Roedd yr adroddiad yn un o gyfres o gyhoeddiadau a gynhyrchwyd gan ein prosiect Cyfiawnder ac Awdurdodaeth, prosiect ymchwil a sefydlwyd i gysgodi ac ategu gwaith y Comisiwn ar Gyfiawnder yng Nghymru. Er iddo gael ei ddefnyddio a’i ddyfynnu gan y Comisiwn, dim ond cyhoeddiad ‘meddal’ cafodd yr adroddiad wrth i'r awduron ehangu ymhellach ar y canfyddiadau. Fodd bynnag, o ystyried ei berthnasedd i'r ymchwiliad, hoffai'r Ganolfan ei gyflwyno fel tystiolaeth ysgrifenedig. Mae croeso i chi gysylltu â ni os gallwn fod o unrhyw gymorth pellach i'r ymchwiliad. In March 2019, Cardiff University’s Wales Governance Centre published the report (attached) Justice at the Jagged Edge in Wales, by Dr Robert Jones and Professor Richard Wyn Jones. The report was one of a series of publications produced by our Justice and Jurisdiction project, a research project established to shadow and complement the work of the Commission on Justice in Wales. While it was utilised and cited by the Commission, the report only received a ‘soft’ publication as its findings are being further expanded upon by the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice at the Jagged Edge in Wales
    Justice at the Jagged Edge in Wales Robert Jones & Richard Wyn Jones Canolfan Llywodraethiant Cymru, Prifysgol Caerdydd Wales Governance Centre, Cardiff University MARCH 2019 JUSTICE AT THE JAGGED EDGE IN WALES Robert Jones and Richard Wyn Jones Wales Governance Centre Cardiff University Preface Acknowledgements The authors would like to extend their thanks to Luke Nicholas, Guto Ifan and Cian Sion for helping to put this report together. We are also extreMely grateful to Huw Pritchard, Laura McAllister, Rachel Minto, Ed Poole and Diana Stirbu for their advice and expertise. We also extend our warM thanks to Rhea Stevens and staff at the IWA for all of their help and support with the project. Finally, the authors like to thank all those agreed to take part in this research. The accounts, experiences and reflections of our interviewees have played a central role in shaping the report’s findings and conclusions. About us The Wales Governance Centre is a research centre that forms part of Cardiff University’s School of Law and Politics undertaking innovative research into all aspects of the law, politics, governMent and political econoMy of Wales, as well the wider UK and European contexts of territorial governance. A key objective of the Centre is to facilitate and encourage informed public debate of key developMents in Welsh governance not only through its research, but also through events and postgraduate teaching. About the authors Robert Jones is a Research Associate at the Wales Governance Centre at Cardiff University. [email protected] Richard Wyn Jones is a Professor of Welsh Politics and Director of the Wales Governance Centre at Cardiff University.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effectiveness of US Public Health Surveillance Systems for Situational
    The Effectiveness of U.S. Public Health Surveillance Systems for Situational Awareness during the 2009 H1N1 Pandemic: A Retrospective Analysis Michael A. Stoto* Department of Health Systems Administration, School of Nursing and Health Systems Administration, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States Abstract Background: The 2009 H1N1 outbreak provides an opportunity to learn about the strengths and weaknesses of current U.S. public health surveillance systems and to identify implications for measuring public health emergency preparedness. Methodology/Principal Findings: We adopted a ‘‘triangulation’’ approach in which multiple contemporary data sources, each with different expected biases, are compared to identify time patterns that are likely to reflect biases versus those that are more likely to be indicative of actual infection rates. This approach is grounded in the understanding that surveillance data are the result of a series of decisions made by patients, health care providers, and public health professionals about seeking and providing health care and about reporting cases to health authorities. Although limited by the lack of a gold standard, this analysis suggests that children and young adults are over-represented in many pH1N1 surveillance systems, especially in the spring wave. In addition, the nearly two-month delay between the Northeast and the South in the Fall peak in some surveillance data seems to at least partially reflect regional differences in concerns about pH1N1rather than real differences in pH1N1 infection rates. Conclusions/Significance: Although the extent of the biases suggested by this analysis cannot be known precisely, the analysis identifies underlying problems with surveillance systems – in particular their dependence on patient and provider behavior, which is influenced by a changing information environment – that could limit situational awareness in future public health emergencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Waite, D. and Morgan, K. (2018) City Deals in the Polycentric State: the Spaces and Politics of Metrophilia in the UK
    Waite, D. and Morgan, K. (2018) City Deals in the polycentric state: the spaces and politics of Metrophilia in the UK. European Urban and Regional Studies, (doi:10.1177/0969776418798678). This is the author’s final accepted version. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/166140/ Deposited on: 10 July 2018 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk City Deals in the Polycentric State: The spaces and politics of Metrophilia in the UK Abstract This paper draws attention to the burgeoning phenomenon of Metrophilia, the fashionable yet uncritical embrace of city-centric narratives of development in place-based policymaking. Within this narrative, City Deals have emerged as mechanisms that pit places in competition with each other through the promotion of local economic growth compacts. Despite being launched with great fanfare as localised victories, City Deals raise important questions regarding the shape of the UK state system and the objectives of spatial policy. Addressing these concerns, and focusing on the tripartite political arrangements in the UK’s devolved administrations nations, we argue that political tensions between nationalism and city- regionalism may be exacerbated through deal-making approaches. 1. Introduction The territorial transformation of the UK state has been a key feature of British politics for at least the last four decades. Such transformation has been driven by various mechanisms and rationales along with competing political objectives and interests (Tewdwr-Jones and McNeill, 2000; Deas and Ward, 2000; Harrison, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Health: the Report of the Chief Veterinary Officer 2009
    Progress through partnership The UK Chief Veterinary Officer’s 2009 report on animal health and welfare www.dardni.gov.uk Department for Environment Llywodraeth Cynulliad Cymru Food and Rural Affairs Welsh Assembly Government Image on page 35 courtesy of Ian Vernon. URLs referred to in this report were correct at time of publication. The publishers of this report cannot take responsibility for their accuracy. Information about animal diseases can be found in Defra’s A–Z Index of Diseases, at www.defra.gov.uk/foodfarm/farmanimal/diseases/atoz/. Editorial team: Titilayo Oguntunde, Patricia Olagunju, Linda Smith Editorial advisors: Patrick Burke (veterinary), Victor Del Rio Vilas (veterinary), Paul Dray (policy) Editorial support: Robert Bell & Co Communications Ltd Design: Creatiscope Design Ltd CONTENTS A personal introduction by the Chief Veterinary Officer (UK) ............................... 2. � PART 1: OVERVIEWS ...................................................... 6. � Chapter 1: Overviews by the four administrations ................. 7. � PART 2: REASONS FOR GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION ..... 18. Chapter 2: Protecting human health .................................... 19. Chapter 3: Protecting and promoting the welfare of animals ... 28. Chapter 4: Protecting the interests of the wider economy, environment and society ..................................... 32. Chapter 5: Promoting and safeguarding international trade ... 43. PART 3: � THE ANIMAL HEALTH AND WELFARE STRATEGY IN ACTION .......................................................
    [Show full text]