DOCSLIB.ORG

New Psittacosaurid Highlights Skull Enlargement in Horned Dinosaurs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Psittacosaurid Highlights Skull Enlargement in Horned Dinosaurs New psittacosaurid highlights skull enlargement in horned dinosaurs PAUL C. SERENO, ZHAO XIJIN, LORIN BROWN, and TAN LIN Sereno, P.C., Zhao, X.−J., Brown, L., and Tan, L. 2007. New psittacosaurid highlights skull enlargement in horned dino− saurs. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 52 (2): 275–284. A new psittacosaurid is based on a nearly complete articulated skeleton from northeastern China that differs principally in skull size as compared to the most common and widespread species, Psittacosaurus mongoliensis. The skull of Psittacosaurus major sp. nov., is 25% larger despite very similar postcranial skeletal dimensions. Such selective skull en− largement is very unusual. Skull size in ceratopsians, in general, scales with positive allometry relative to body mass: spe− cies of greater mass have proportionately larger skulls. This pattern stands in marked contrast to that for other vertebrate herbivores, in which larger−bodied species either have proportionately similar or smaller skulls relative to body mass. Larger−bodied ceratopsians evolved skulls that are 50% or more of trunk length—as measured without their expansive cranial frill. Although contemporaneous duck−billed dinosaurs also exhibit some positive allometry in the skull, skull length remains approximately 35% of trunk length. The evolution of extraordinary absolute and relative skull size among ceratopsians appears to have been driven by sexual selection and involved the tandem evolution of reduced head mobility and an obligate quadrupedal posture. Key words: Ornithischia, Marginocephalia, Psittacosaurus, Cretaceous, Yixian Formation, China. Paul C. Sereno [[email protected]], Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, 1027 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; Zhao Xijin [[email protected]], Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Academia Sinica, Beijing 100044, China; Lorin Brown [[email protected]], 1650 45th Street, Munster, IN 46321, USA; Tan Lin [[email protected]], Long Hao Geologic and Paleontological Research Center, Bureau of Land and Resources, Hohhot 010010, Nei Mongol Autonomous Region, China. Introduction Institutional abbreviations.—AMNH, American Museum of Natural History, New York; LH, Long Hao Institute for Stra− Comparison of skull length versus body mass in most tetra− tigraphic Paleontology, Hohhot, Nei Mongol Autonomous pods shows that larger animals of similar design have skulls Region, China. that are proportionately the same or somewhat smaller in length. Skull length, in other words, scales isometrically or somewhat negatively in the vast majority of tetrapods (MacFadden 1986; Van Valkenburgh 1990). Across mam− Systematic paleontology malian ungulates, skull length and body mass are so tightly correlated that the former often has been used as a proxy for Dinosauria Owen, 1842 the latter (Janis 1990). Ornithischia Seeley, 1888 Here we describe a very peculiar case among dinosaurs Ceratopsia Marsh, 1890 where one species has a skull some 25–30% larger than a Psittacosauridae Osborn, 1923 closely related species despite similar postcranial dimen− sions. The case involves a new species of the Early Creta− Genus Psittacosaurus Osborn, 1923 ceous−age parrot−beaked dinosaur Psittacosaurus. It high− Psittacosaurus major sp. nov. lights the unusual role played by skull size in ceratopsian Derivation of the name: From the Latin, major, meaning greater. evolution. Ceratopsids of Late Cretaceous age, in turn, Holotype: LH PV1, articulated skull and nearly complete postcranial ske− evolved the largest skulls of any terrestrial herbivores, leton (Figs. 1–3). The skull is nearly complete lacking only the right, and whether measured in relative or absolute dimensions. This most of the left, palpebral, and portions of the right postorbital and trend in skull enlargement in larger−bodied species can be squamosal. The postcranial skeleton lacks the left pubis, right radius and characterized quantitatively by plotting skull length as a portions of the right manus, left tibia and fibula, and portions of the left pes. function of estimated body mass. Type locality: Near Beipiao City, Liaoning Province, China. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 52 (2): 275–284, 2007 http://app.pan.pl/acta52/app52−275.pdf 276 ACTA PALAEONTOLOGICA POLONICA 52 (2), 2007 100 mm Fig. 1. Skull of Psittacosaurus major sp. nov., LHPV 1, Near Beipiao City, Liaoning Province, China, lower portion of the Lower Cretaceous Yixian Forma− tion, in lateral (A) and dorsal (B)views.A1 and A2, photographs; A2 and B2, explanatory drawings of the same. In A2 and B2 the cross−hatching indicates the broken bone and the tone the matrix. Type horizon: Lower portion of the Yixian Formation, Lower Creta− sal skull roof as a result of the narrowest proportions of the ceous (Berriasian to Valanginian in age; Wang et al. 1998). nasals and frontals among psittacosaur species; the most Diagnosis.—Psittacosaurid with a large skull relative to its prominent dentary flanges of any psittacosaur species with postcranial skeleton (30% larger than Psittacosaurus mon− a depth approximately one−third that of the mandibular goliensis and most other species); transversely narrow dor− ramus; ventrolaterally projecting jugal horn; absence (clo− SERENO ET AL.—NEW PSITTACOSAURID AND SKULL ENLARGEMENT IN HORNED DINOSAURS 277 Table 1. Select measurements (cm) of Psittacosaurus mongoliensis (AMNH 6253; Sereno 1987) and Psittacosaurus major sp. nov. (LH PV1). Parentheses indicate estimate. Psittacosaurus Psittacosaurus Measurement mongoliensis major sp. nov. Skull Length in midline 15.21 20.3 Width across jugals 14.21 18.5 Axial column (centrum length) Cervical 2 2.4 2.4 Cervical 3 1.9 1.8 Cervical 4 1.8 1.8 Fig. 2. Relative size of the skull of the adult holotypic specimens of Cervical 5 1.9 2.0 Psittacosaurus mongoliensis (black) and Psittacosaurus major sp. nov. Cervical 6 (1.8) 2.2 (grey) in lateral (A) and dorsal (B) views. Cervical 7 1.7 1.6 Cervical 8 1.9 1.8 sure) of the external mandibular fenestra as in Psittaco− Cervical 9 2.1 1.8 saurus sinensis and P. neimongoliensis; seven sacral verte− Dorsal 15 (2.1) (2.2) brae (one dorsosacral added with rib attachment to the distal Caudal 6 1.8 1.8 end of the preacetabular process), one more than in other psittacosaur species. Appendicular skeleton (maximum length) Scapula 14.8 17.1 Description.—Almost all of the diagnostic features of Psit− tacosaurus major sp. nov. reside in the skull (Figs. 1, 2). In Humerus 12.6 14.9 lateral view, the oval profile of the skull of P. major is the re− Radius 8.1 9.1 sult of the relatively short snout and pronounced dentary Metacarpal III 3.1 3.1 flanges (Fig. 1A). Preorbital length is approximately 33% of Femur 15.7 17.2 skull length, similar to that in P. sinensis and intermediate Tibia 18.11 19.7 between that in P. meileyingensis (27%) and P. mongoliensis Metatarsal III 7.9 8.6 (37%; Sereno 1987). In profile P. major most closely resem− 1 AMNH 6254 bles P. meileyingesis (Sereno and Zhao 1988) as both species have pronounced, projecting mandibular flanges and an an− gular with very deep proportions (deeper than the suran− The maxillary and dentary crowns, as exposed in lateral gular). In the posteroventral corner of the skull, the jugal and view, are very similar to that in Psittacosaurus mongoliensis quadrate and the quadratojugal and squamosal approach (Sereno and Zhao 1988). The lateral aspect of each maxillary each other more closely than in other species but do not es− crown is divided into three parts—a central low primary tablish sutural contact. The mandibular fenestra, which is re− ridge and two lobes to either side. Low secondary ridges are tained as a small opening between the dentary, surangular present on the lobes, the anterior narrower than the posterior and angular in all other psittacosaurid species, is closed in P. lobe. the lateral aspect of the dentary crowns is smooth. A major as preserved on both sides of the skull. bulbous primary ridge on the medial side is exposed along In dorsal view, the skull is very similar to that of P. the apical wear facet in cross−section. mongoliensis except for the narrow proportions of the nasals The vertebral column is nearly identical in form and size and frontals (Fig. 1B). Only a narrow median exposure of the to that in P. mongoliensis (Table 1). The axis is not notice− nasals separates the prefrontals, and the sides of the snout are ably longer or more robust despite the relative increase in exposed to each side of the nasals in dorsal view. The frontals the size of the skull. The sacrum has incorporated an addi− do not expand broadly posterior to the orbit. As a result, more tional dorsal vertebra for a total of seven (Fig. 3). There are of the laterotemporal region is exposed in dorsal view than in only six sacral vertebrae in other psittacosaurid species in P. mongoliensis. The junction of the postorbital and frontal is which the sacrum is known. In these species, the rib of the swollen. Along the postorbital bar, the edge of the postorbital first sacral contacts the base of the preacetabular process. In is everted but not swollen into a boss as in P. sienesis. The P. major, in contrast, the rib of the first sacral sacral articu− ventrolaterally projecting jugal horns are more prominently lates with a raised articular facet close to the distal end of developed than in P. mongoliensis and P. meileyingensis and the preacetabular process, and the second sacral contacts do not project as strongly laterally as in P. sinensis and P. the base of the process (Fig. 3). An additional dorsosacral, xingjiangensis (Sereno et al. 1988). In lateral view, the tip of thus, appears to have been added in P. major. The centrum the jugal horn is situated ventral, rather than anterior, to the of this dorsosacral vertebra is fully coossified with that of laterotemporal fenestra.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Neoceratopsian Dinosaur from the Early Cretaceous of Mongolia And
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01222-7 OPEN A neoceratopsian dinosaur from the early Cretaceous of Mongolia and the early evolution of ceratopsia ✉ Congyu Yu 1 , Albert Prieto-Marquez2, Tsogtbaatar Chinzorig 3,4, Zorigt Badamkhatan4,5 & Mark Norell1 1234567890():,; Ceratopsia is a diverse dinosaur clade from the Middle Jurassic to Late Cretaceous with early diversification in East Asia. However, the phylogeny of basal ceratopsians remains unclear. Here we report a new basal neoceratopsian dinosaur Beg tse based on a partial skull from Baruunbayan, Ömnögovi aimag, Mongolia. Beg is diagnosed by a unique combination of primitive and derived characters including a primitively deep premaxilla with four pre- maxillary teeth, a trapezoidal antorbital fossa with a poorly delineated anterior margin, very short dentary with an expanded and shallow groove on lateral surface, the derived presence of a robust jugal having a foramen on its anteromedial surface, and five equally spaced tubercles on the lateral ridge of the surangular. This is to our knowledge the earliest known occurrence of basal neoceratopsian in Mongolia, where this group was previously only known from Late Cretaceous strata. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that it is sister to all other neoceratopsian dinosaurs. 1 Division of Vertebrate Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, New York 10024, USA. 2 Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont, ICTA-ICP, Edifici Z, c/de les Columnes s/n Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain. 3 Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA. 4 Institute of Paleontology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, ✉ Ulaanbaatar 15160, Mongolia.
    [Show full text]
  • MEET the DINOSAURS! WHAT’S in a NAME? a LOT If You Are a Dinosaur!
    MEET THE DINOSAURS! WHAT’S IN A NAME? A LOT if you are a dinosaur! I will call you Dyoplosaurus! Most dinosaurs get their names from the ancient Greek and Latin languages. And I will call you Mojoceratops! And sometimes they are named after a defining feature on their body. Their names are made up of word parts that describe the dinosaur. The name must be sent to a special group of people called the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature to be approved! Did You The word DINOSAUR comes from the Greek word meaning terrible lizard and was first said by Know? Sir Richard Owen in 1841. © 2013 Omaha’s Henry Doorly Zoo & Aquarium® | 3 SEE IF YOU CAN FIND OUT THE MEANING OF SOME OF OUR DINOSAUR’S NAMES. Dinosaur names are not just tough to pronounce, they often have meaning. Dinosaur Name MEANING of Dinosaur Name Carnotaurus (KAR-no-TORE-us) Means “flesh-eating bull” Spinosaurus (SPY-nuh-SORE-us) Dyoplosaurus (die-o-pluh-SOR-us) Amargasaurus (ah-MAR-guh-SORE-us) Omeisaurus (Oh-MY-ee-SORE-us) Pachycephalosaurus (pak-ee-SEF-uh-low-SORE-us) Tuojiangosaurus (toh-HWANG-uh-SORE-us) Yangchuanosaurus (Yang-chew-ON-uh-SORE-us) Quetzalcoatlus (KWET-zal-coe-AT-lus) Ouranosaurus (ooh-RAN-uh-SORE-us) Parasaurolophus (PAIR-uh-so-ROL-uh-PHUS) Kosmoceratops (KOZ-mo-SARA-tops) Mojoceratops (moe-joe-SEH-rah-tops) Triceratops (try-SER-uh-TOPS) Tyrannosaurus rex (tuh-RAN-uh-SORE-us) Find the answers by visiting the Resource Library at Carnotaurus A: www.OmahaZoo.com/Education. Search word: Dinosaurs 4 | © 2013 Omaha’s Henry Doorly Zoo & Aquarium® DINO DEFENSE All animals in the wild have to protect themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • A. K. Rozhdestvensky HISTORY of the DINOSAUR FAUNA of ASIA
    A. K. Rozhdestvensky HISTORY OF THE DINOSAUR FAUNA OF ASIA AND OTHER CONTINENTS AND QUESTIONS CONCERNING PALEOGEOGRAPHY* The distribution and evolution of dinosaur faunas during the period of their existence, from the Late Triassic to the end of the Cretaceous, shows a close connection with the paleogeography of the Mesozoic. However these questions were hard to examine on a global scale until recently, because only the dinosaurs of North America were well known, where during the last century were found their richest deposits and where the best paleontologists were studying them — J. Leidy, E. Cope, O. Marsh, R. Lull, H. Osborn, C. Gilmore, B. Brown, and later many others. On the remaining continents, including Europe, where the study of dinosaurs started earlier than it did in America, the information was rather incomplete due to the fragmentary condition of the finds and rare, episodic studies. The Asian continent remained unexplored the longest, preventing any intercontinental comparisons. Systematic exploration and large excavations of dinosaur locations in Asia, which began in the last fifty years (Osborn, 1930; Efremov, 1954; Rozhdestvenskiy, 1957a, 1961, 1969, 1971; Rozhdestvenskiy & Chzhou, 1960; Kielan-Jaworowska & Dovchin, 1968; Kurochkin, Kalandadze, & Reshetov, 1970; Barsbold, Voronin, & Zhegallo, 1971) showed that this continent has abundant dinosaur remains, particularly in its central part (Fig. 1). Their study makes it possible to establish a faunal connection between Asia and other continents, correlate the stratigraphy of continental deposits of the Mesozoic, because dinosaurs are reliable leading forms, as well as to make corrections in the existing paleogeographic structure. The latter, in their turn, promote a better understanding of the possible paths of distribution of the individual groups of dinosaurs, the reasons for their appearance, their development, and disappearance.
    [Show full text]
  • At Carowinds
    at Carowinds EDUCATOR’S GUIDE CLASSROOM LESSON PLANS & FIELD TRIP ACTIVITIES Table of Contents at Carowinds Introduction The Field Trip ................................... 2 The Educator’s Guide ....................... 3 Field Trip Activity .................................. 4 Lesson Plans Lesson 1: Form and Function ........... 6 Lesson 2: Dinosaur Detectives ....... 10 Lesson 3: Mesozoic Math .............. 14 Lesson 4: Fossil Stories.................. 22 Games & Puzzles Crossword Puzzles ......................... 29 Logic Puzzles ................................. 32 Word Searches ............................... 37 Answer Keys ...................................... 39 Additional Resources © 2012 Dinosaurs Unearthed Recommended Reading ................. 44 All rights reserved. Except for educational fair use, no portion of this guide may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any Dinosaur Data ................................ 45 means—electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, or any other without Discovering Dinosaurs .................... 52 explicit prior permission from Dinosaurs Unearthed. Multiple copies may only be made by or for the teacher for class use. Glossary .............................................. 54 Content co-created by TurnKey Education, Inc. and Dinosaurs Unearthed, 2012 Standards www.turnkeyeducation.net www.dinosaursunearthed.com Curriculum Standards .................... 59 Introduction The Field Trip From the time of the first exhibition unveiled in 1854 at the Crystal
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogenetic Analysis of the Basal Ornithischia (Reptilia, Dinosauria)
    A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF THE BASAL ORNITHISCHIA (REPTILIA, DINOSAURIA) Marc Richard Spencer A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December 2007 Committee: Margaret M. Yacobucci, Advisor Don C. Steinker Daniel M. Pavuk © 2007 Marc Richard Spencer All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Margaret M. Yacobucci, Advisor The placement of Lesothosaurus diagnosticus and the Heterodontosauridae within the Ornithischia has been problematic. Historically, Lesothosaurus has been regarded as a basal ornithischian dinosaur, the sister taxon to the Genasauria. Recent phylogenetic analyses, however, have placed Lesothosaurus as a more derived ornithischian within the Genasauria. The Fabrosauridae, of which Lesothosaurus was considered a member, has never been phylogenetically corroborated and has been considered a paraphyletic assemblage. Prior to recent phylogenetic analyses, the problematic Heterodontosauridae was placed within the Ornithopoda as the sister taxon to the Euornithopoda. The heterodontosaurids have also been considered as the basal member of the Cerapoda (Ornithopoda + Marginocephalia), the sister taxon to the Marginocephalia, and as the sister taxon to the Genasauria. To reevaluate the placement of these taxa, along with other basal ornithischians and more derived subclades, a phylogenetic analysis of 19 taxonomic units, including two outgroup taxa, was performed. Analysis of 97 characters and their associated character states culled, modified, and/or rescored from published literature based on published descriptions, produced four most parsimonious trees. Consistency and retention indices were calculated and a bootstrap analysis was performed to determine the relative support for the resultant phylogeny. The Ornithischia was recovered with Pisanosaurus as its basalmost member.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revised Taxonomy of the Iguanodont Dinosaur Genera and Species
    ARTICLE IN PRESS + MODEL Cretaceous Research xx (2007) 1e25 www.elsevier.com/locate/CretRes A revised taxonomy of the iguanodont dinosaur genera and species Gregory S. Paul 3109 North Calvert Station, Side Apartment, Baltimore, MD 21218-3807, USA Received 20 April 2006; accepted in revised form 27 April 2007 Abstract Criteria for designating dinosaur genera are inconsistent; some very similar species are highly split at the generic level, other anatomically disparate species are united at the same rank. Since the mid-1800s the classic genus Iguanodon has become a taxonomic grab-bag containing species spanning most of the Early Cretaceous of the northern hemisphere. Recently the genus was radically redesignated when the type was shifted from nondiagnostic English Valanginian teeth to a complete skull and skeleton of the heavily built, semi-quadrupedal I. bernissartensis from much younger Belgian sediments, even though the latter is very different in form from the gracile skeletal remains described by Mantell. Currently, iguanodont remains from Europe are usually assigned to either robust I. bernissartensis or gracile I. atherfieldensis, regardless of lo- cation or stage. A stratigraphic analysis is combined with a character census that shows the European iguanodonts are markedly more morpho- logically divergent than other dinosaur genera, and some appear phylogenetically more derived than others. Two new genera and a new species have been or are named for the gracile iguanodonts of the Wealden Supergroup; strongly bipedal Mantellisaurus atherfieldensis Paul (2006. Turning the old into the new: a separate genus for the gracile iguanodont from the Wealden of England. In: Carpenter, K. (Ed.), Horns and Beaks: Ceratopsian and Ornithopod Dinosaurs.
    [Show full text]
  • 71St Annual Meeting Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Paris Las Vegas Las Vegas, Nevada, USA November 2 – 5, 2011 SESSION CONCURRENT SESSION CONCURRENT
    ISSN 1937-2809 online Journal of Supplement to the November 2011 Vertebrate Paleontology Vertebrate Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Society of Vertebrate 71st Annual Meeting Paleontology Society of Vertebrate Las Vegas Paris Nevada, USA Las Vegas, November 2 – 5, 2011 Program and Abstracts Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 71st Annual Meeting Program and Abstracts COMMITTEE MEETING ROOM POSTER SESSION/ CONCURRENT CONCURRENT SESSION EXHIBITS SESSION COMMITTEE MEETING ROOMS AUCTION EVENT REGISTRATION, CONCURRENT MERCHANDISE SESSION LOUNGE, EDUCATION & OUTREACH SPEAKER READY COMMITTEE MEETING POSTER SESSION ROOM ROOM SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS SEVENTY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING PARIS LAS VEGAS HOTEL LAS VEGAS, NV, USA NOVEMBER 2–5, 2011 HOST COMMITTEE Stephen Rowland, Co-Chair; Aubrey Bonde, Co-Chair; Joshua Bonde; David Elliott; Lee Hall; Jerry Harris; Andrew Milner; Eric Roberts EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Philip Currie, President; Blaire Van Valkenburgh, Past President; Catherine Forster, Vice President; Christopher Bell, Secretary; Ted Vlamis, Treasurer; Julia Clarke, Member at Large; Kristina Curry Rogers, Member at Large; Lars Werdelin, Member at Large SYMPOSIUM CONVENORS Roger B.J. Benson, Richard J. Butler, Nadia B. Fröbisch, Hans C.E. Larsson, Mark A. Loewen, Philip D. Mannion, Jim I. Mead, Eric M. Roberts, Scott D. Sampson, Eric D. Scott, Kathleen Springer PROGRAM COMMITTEE Jonathan Bloch, Co-Chair; Anjali Goswami, Co-Chair; Jason Anderson; Paul Barrett; Brian Beatty; Kerin Claeson; Kristina Curry Rogers; Ted Daeschler; David Evans; David Fox; Nadia B. Fröbisch; Christian Kammerer; Johannes Müller; Emily Rayfield; William Sanders; Bruce Shockey; Mary Silcox; Michelle Stocker; Rebecca Terry November 2011—PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS 1 Members and Friends of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, The Host Committee cordially welcomes you to the 71st Annual Meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology in Las Vegas.
    [Show full text]
  • A Juvenile Cf. Edmontosaurus Annectens (Ornithischia, Hadrosauridae) Femur Documents a Previously Unreported Intermediate Growth Stage for This Taxon Andrew A
    Vertebrate Anatomy Morphology Palaeontology 7:59–67 59 ISSN 2292-1389 A juvenile cf. Edmontosaurus annectens (Ornithischia, Hadrosauridae) femur documents a previously unreported intermediate growth stage for this taxon Andrew A. Farke1,2,3,* and Eunice Yip2 1Raymond M. Alf Museum of Paleontology, 1175 West Baseline Road, Claremont, CA, 91711, USA 2The Webb Schools, 1175 West Baseline Road, Claremont, CA, 91711, USA 3Dinosaur Institute, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd. Los Angeles, CA, 90007, USA; [email protected] Abstract: A nearly complete, but isolated, femur of a small hadrosaurid from the Hell Creek Formation of Montana is tentatively referred to Edmontosaurus annectens. At 28 cm long, the element can be classified as likely that from an ‘early juvenile’ individual, approximately 24% of the maximum known femur length for this species. Specimens from this size range and age class have not been described previously for E. annectens. Notable trends with increasing body size include increasingly distinct separation of the femoral head and greater trochanter, relative increase in the size of the cranial trochanter, a slight reduction in the relative breadth of the fourth trochanter, and a relative increase in the prominence of the cranial intercondylar groove. The gross profile of the femoral shaft is fairly consistent between the smallest and largest individuals. Although an ontogenetic change from relatively symmetrical to an asymmetrical shape in the fourth trochanter has been suggested previously, the new juvenile specimen shows an asymmetric fourth tro- chanter. Thus, there may not be a consistent ontogenetic pattern in trochanteric morphology. An isometric relationship between femoral circumference and femoral length is confirmed for Edmontosaurus.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Biogeography of Iguanodontian Dinosaurs, with Implications from Ontogeny and an Examination of the Function of the Fused Carpal-Digit I Complex
    Phylogeny and Biogeography of Iguanodontian Dinosaurs, with Implications from Ontogeny and an Examination of the Function of the Fused Carpal-Digit I Complex By Karen E. Poole B.A. in Geology, May 2004, University of Pennsylvania M.A. in Earth and Planetary Sciences, August 2008, Washington University in St. Louis A Dissertation submitted to The Faculty of The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 31, 2015 Dissertation Directed by Catherine Forster Professor of Biology The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University certifies that Karen Poole has passed the Final Examination for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy as of August 10th, 2015. This is the final and approved form of the dissertation. Phylogeny and Biogeography of Iguanodontian Dinosaurs, with Implications from Ontogeny and an Examination of the Function of the Fused Carpal-Digit I Complex Karen E. Poole Dissertation Research Committee: Catherine A. Forster, Professor of Biology, Dissertation Director James M. Clark, Ronald Weintraub Professor of Biology, Committee Member R. Alexander Pyron, Robert F. Griggs Assistant Professor of Biology, Committee Member ii © Copyright 2015 by Karen Poole All rights reserved iii Dedication To Joseph Theis, for his unending support, and for always reminding me what matters most in life. To my parents, who have always encouraged me to pursue my dreams, even those they didn’t understand. iv Acknowledgements First, a heartfelt thank you is due to my advisor, Cathy Forster, for giving me free reign in this dissertation, but always providing valuable commentary on any piece of writing I sent her, no matter how messy.
    [Show full text]
  • A Battering Ram?
    A Battering Ram? All evidence suggests that Pachycephalosaur skulls were built to withstand extreme forces 9 inches of solid bone Bone organized in a radial arrangement- structural support Articulation btw back of skull and vertebrae oriented to transfer forces linearly Articulation btw back of skull and vertebral column built to withstand sideways forces Vertebral column has tongue and groove articulations Spinal column is an S-shaped shock absorber BUT There is no ‘locking’ mechanism on skull to keep battering heads aligned Some Pachycephalosaurs have imprinted blood vessels on dome These factors suggests that head- butting may not be likely Intraspecies Competition (typically male-male) Females are typically choosey Why? Because they have more to loose Common rule in biology: Females are expensive to lose, males are cheap (e.g. deer hunting) Females choose the male most likely to provide the most successful offspring Males compete with each other for access to female vs. female chooses the strongest male Choosey females // Strong males have more offspring => SEXUAL selection Many ways to do this... But: In general, maximize competition and minimize accidental deaths (= no fitness) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PontCXFgs0M http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1941236/giraffe_fight/ http://www.youtube.com/watch? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYDx1y38vGw http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULRtdk-3Yh4 Air-filled horn cores vs. solid bone skull caps... Gotta have a cheezy animated slide. Homalocephale Pachycephalosaurus Prenocephale Tylocephale Stegoceras Head butting Pachycephalosaurs Bone structure was probably strong enough to withstand collision Convex nature would favor glancing blows Instead, dome and spines seem better suited for “flank butting” So..
    [Show full text]
  • A New Maastrichtian Species of the Centrosaurine Ceratopsid Pachyrhinosaurus from the North Slope of Alaska
    A new Maastrichtian species of the centrosaurine ceratopsid Pachyrhinosaurus from the North Slope of Alaska ANTHONY R. FIORILLO and RONALD S. TYKOSKI Fiorillo, A.R. and Tykoski, R.S. 2012. A new Maastrichtian species of the centrosaurine ceratopsid Pachyrhinosaurus from the North Slope of Alaska. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 57 (3): 561–573. The Cretaceous rocks of the Prince Creek Formation contain the richest record of polar dinosaurs found anywhere in the world. Here we describe a new species of horned dinosaur, Pachyrhinosaurus perotorum that exhibits an apomorphic character in the frill, as well as a unique combination of other characters. Phylogenetic analysis of 16 taxa of ceratopsians failed to resolve relationships between P. perotorum and other Pachyrhinosaurus species (P. canadensis and P. lakustai). P. perotorum shares characters with each of the previously known species that are not present in the other, including very large nasal and supraorbital bosses that are nearly in contact and separated only by a narrow groove as in P. canadensis, and a rostral comb formed by the nasals and premaxillae as in P. lakustai. P. perotorum is the youngest centrosaurine known (70–69 Ma), and the locality that produced the taxon, the Kikak−Tegoseak Quarry, is close to the highest latitude for recovery of ceratopsid remains. Key words: Dinosauria, Centrosaurinae, Cretaceous, Prince Creek Formation, Kikak−Tegoseak Quarry, Arctic. Anthony R. Fiorillo [[email protected]] and Ronald S. Tykoski [[email protected]], Perot Museum of Nature and Science, 2201 N. Field Street, Dallas, TX 75202, USA. Received 4 April 2011, accepted 23 July 2011, available online 26 August 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Competition Structured a Late Cretaceous Megaherbivorous Dinosaur Assemblage Jordan C
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Competition structured a Late Cretaceous megaherbivorous dinosaur assemblage Jordan C. Mallon 1,2 Modern megaherbivore community richness is limited by bottom-up controls, such as resource limitation and resultant dietary competition. However, the extent to which these same controls impacted the richness of fossil megaherbivore communities is poorly understood. The present study investigates the matter with reference to the megaherbivorous dinosaur assemblage from the middle to upper Campanian Dinosaur Park Formation of Alberta, Canada. Using a meta-analysis of 21 ecomorphological variables measured across 14 genera, contemporaneous taxa are demonstrably well-separated in ecomorphospace at the family/subfamily level. Moreover, this pattern is persistent through the approximately 1.5 Myr timespan of the formation, despite continual species turnover, indicative of underlying structural principles imposed by long-term ecological competition. After considering the implications of ecomorphology for megaherbivorous dinosaur diet, it is concluded that competition structured comparable megaherbivorous dinosaur communities throughout the Late Cretaceous of western North America. Te question of which mechanisms regulate species coexistence is fundamental to understanding the evolution of biodiversity1. Te standing diversity (richness) of extant megaherbivore (herbivores weighing ≥1,000 kg) com- munities appears to be mainly regulated by bottom-up controls2–4 as these animals are virtually invulnerable to top-down down processes (e.g., predation) when fully grown. Tus, while the young may occasionally succumb to predation, fully-grown African elephants (Loxodonta africana), rhinoceroses (Ceratotherium simum and Diceros bicornis), hippopotamuses (Hippopotamus amphibius), and girafes (Girafa camelopardalis) are rarely targeted by predators, and ofen show indiference to their presence in the wild5.
    [Show full text]