Dear Friends: Presenting a Van Cliburn Medalist Is Highly Admirable in the World of Chamber Music Programming. but Here in Maine

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dear Friends: Presenting a Van Cliburn Medalist Is Highly Admirable in the World of Chamber Music Programming. but Here in Maine Dear Friends: Presenting a Van Cliburn medalist is highly admirable in the world of chamber music programming. But here in Maine we like to do things our own way. As such, Portland Ovations makes it its practice to present the Gilmore Artist Award winners. Since 2002, Ovations has presented all of the awardees. Who can forget the intuitive grace of Kirill Gerstein’s playing or the fiery attack of Ingrid Fliter or the breathtaking command of Piotr Anderszewski? It’s exciting to consider what we all will be saying tonight after experiencing Rafal Blechacz. Unlike the Van Cliburn and other lauded honors, the Gilmore winner is not chosen out of a festival setting in which pianists compete to win. Instead, performers are nominated from around the globe and then observed over a number of years by an anonymous Artistic Advisory Committee. Pianists are not aware they are being considered, and one of the most promising is honored with the Gilmore every four years. Given the generosity of the award and the in-depth selection process, some have likened it to the MacArthur “Genius Award.” Presentation of the Gilmore winner also serves Ovations’ dedication to bringing to Maine emerging instrumentalists whose impact will grow and fortify the future of classical music. Nothing is more thrilling than hearing at intermission: “Amazing. Where did they find him/her?” Recitals by these young virtuosos along with esteemed veterans and a dash of contemporary concert music is what distinguishes Ovations’ chamber series. You could say it’s the way live performance should be. We hope you agree. Enjoy, Aimée M. Petrin Executive Director PROGRAM NOTES by Linda Russell Italian Concerto in F Major, BWV 971 J. S. Bach Coming from a long line of German musicians, Johann Sebastian Bach (1685-1750) began his professional career at eighteen as a church organist. His first important position, as court organist and chamber musician to the Duke of Weimar (1708-17), came just five years later. During Bach’s mature period while he was Cantor of St. Thomas’s in Leipzig (1723-50), he published his most comprehensive publication of keyboard music, the Clavier-Übung. He included the Concerto nach italienishem Gusto of 1735 along with several toccatas in Part II of this compilation. Bach composed the Italian Concerto for a two-manual harpsichord in the style of a Baroque Italian concerto grosso. Following that style the work is in a typical Fast-Slow- Fast arrangement (Allegro, Andante, Presto). He also included the dynamic markings forte and piano to imitate the alternation of the large group (grosso) and small group (concertino). The first movement provides a crisp, cheerful beginning with two themes corresponding to the two groups of a concerto grosso. The slow middle movement has the character of an aria with its expressive cantabile melody over a persistent pizzicato- like accompaniment figure in the left hand. In the vigorous third movement Bach returned to the contrast of two themes and two alternating groups. Sonata in C minor, Op. 13 “Pathetique” Ludwig van Beethoven Ludwig van Beethoven’s (1770-1827) thirty-two sonatas, perhaps the most important single category in his output, not only reveal his development as a composer but also demonstrate how he transformed the genre. It was in the piano sonatas that he experimented with and worked out new ideas and methods before extending them to other categories of composition. The sonata on today’s program falls into Beethoven’s first period of sonata composition; here Beethoven experimented with accepted classic structures. Sonata in C Minor, Op.13 Pathétique, the first of Beethoven’s sonatas to gain universal popularity, was published in 1799 and dedicated to Prince Karl Lichnowsky, one of Beethoven’s leading patrons. Beethoven himself gave the work its descriptive title. Throughout the 18th and 19th centuries, the key of C Minor was associated with the pathétique and this character is clear from the outset. A Grave introduction with heavy chords in a dotted rhythm followed by a cantabile line with a ponderous chordal accompaniment opens the sonata. This is the first time Beethoven employs a slow introduction and then integrates it into the rest of the movement. The rhythmically driven principal theme in the Allegro section contains rapidly ascending chords with offbeat accentuations; a more graceful secondary theme provides contrast. Before the development begins and again in the coda, Beethoven brings back, in abbreviated form, the Grave beginning of the introduction. In the sustained and lyric Adagio cantabile in A-flat Major, Beethoven composed a rondo (ABACA), which releases the tension with an interval of peace. The Finale is also a rondo with a yearning principal theme and two contrasting sections, one with eighth note and triplet figuration, the second with two- voice writing and figuration. “To sum up thePathétique sonata, one feels that Beethoven was expressing Tragedy, as the young feel it—with the glamor, the exultancy and the urgency of a Hamlet or Romeo and Juliet.” (Lythgoe) Frédéric François Chopin Frédéric François Chopin (1810-1849) devoted himself almost exclusively to compositions for the piano. In a period when spectacular and forceful playing was greatly admired, Chopin, though capable of great power, achieved many of his effects through a more subtle and restrained style of playing and composition. The fundamental texture of Chopin’s music is accompanied melody, but with limitless variation and expressiveness. Chopin is considered to be among the greatest harmonic innovators of the nineteenth century, pushing the accepted procedures of chromatic dissonance and modulation into previously unexplored territory. Formally, Chopin preferred the creative possibilities of the character piece, a smaller composition in which a composer evokes a mood, thought, or emotion. Such pieces are usually in a simple form; the ternary (ABA) form is the most common, with a contrasting middle section. Chopin’s compositions range from the strict ternary designs of some of the dances, preludes, and nocturnes to the larger structure of the ballades, scherzi, and polonaises—still with a departure and return, but with the return varied, delayed, shortened, or extended in subtle ways. Nocturne E major Op. 62, No. 2 Chopin took the title and general character of the nocturne from English composer John Field, but imbued his nocturnes with distinctive melodies, harmonic innovations, and an original piano style. Most often Chopin composed the nocturnes in a ternary form with the B section a little quicker in tempo and more dramatic in character. The right hand sings the simple lyrical melody, often ornamented upon its return, against a background of arpeggiated accompaniment. In Nocturne in E Major, Op. 62, No. 2 the cantabile sections contrast with the more agitated middle section. Three Waltzes, Op. 64 Waltzes were very popular dances in the nineteenth century—first as short, modest pieces, later becoming more elegant and refined. As with other dances, Chopin took the waltz to new heights. His earlier waltzes are modest with simple, short trio sections; the later waltzes were brilliant, bravura pieces. He composed waltzes of two types: they were either brilliant and dashing with glittering piano figuration, or they were of a pensive and expressive character. Schumann commented about one of Chopin’s waltzes that it was “aristocratic through and through. If played for dancers, half of the ladies should be countesses at least.” The Waltz in D-flat, Op. 64 No. ,1 familiarly known as the Minute Waltz, features fluent finger passages which paint “a whirl of unrestrained gaiety.” This sobriquet refers to the miniature nature of the work rather than the length of time required to play it. Chopin gave this waltz the title Valse du petit chien, inspired by his lover George Sand’s dog chasing its tail. A short cantabile central section provides contrast. For the second waltz of the set in C-sharp Minor, Chopin balanced three musically contrasted ideas. The first is characterized by a yearning expression, the second is faster with running figuration in the right hand, and the third central section is slower and more contemplative. The order of the themes is ABCBAB. Artur Rubinstein played this waltz often. When asked how he could continue to play the same waltz for over 75 years, he replied, “Because it’s not the same, and I don’t play it the same way.” Alexander Glazunov orchestrated it for part of the ballet Les Sylphides. The last waltz in this set was a favorite of Chopin and he frequently played it. The A sections possess a charming, suave elegance; the bass theme in the central section is especially beautiful. Artur Rubinstein said, “This waltz is the most original of all. This waltz is not for dancing, nor is it a ‘salon piece,’ no, it is a thing directly from Chopin’s heart and soul.” Three Mazurkas, Op. 56 The folk music of his native Poland strongly influenced Chopin—as seen in his approximately fifty mazurkas. The mazurka originated as a Polish country dance. There are several different types of mazurkas, but all move in triple meter with strong accents (accompanied by the tap of a heel) on either the second or third beat. Frequently, an accompaniment was played on the duda, a kind of bagpipe. Chopin used these basic rhythmic features of dotted rhythms, syncopations and irregular accentuations, extended the original forms, and developed the mazurka to its fullest and most intimate expression by adding grace notes and ornamental figuration. The variety of moods range from “radiant joyfulness to aching sadness, from brevity to extended movement.” Chopin composed the three mazurkas of Op. 56 in 1843-1844 and they comprise one of his more substantial sets of mazurkas.
Recommended publications
  • Romantic Listening Key
    Name ______________________________ Romantic Listening Key Number: 7.1 CD 5/47 pg. 297 Title: Symphonie Fantastique, 4th mvmt Composer: Berlioz Genre: Program Symphony Characteristics Texture: ____________________________________________________ Text: _______________________________________________________ Voicing/Instrumentation: orchestra What I heard: timp start, high bsn solo Number: 7.2 CD 6/11 pg 339 Title: The Moldau Composer: Smetana Genre: symphonic poem Characteristics Texture: homophonic Text: _______________________________________________________ Voicing/Instrumentation: orchestra What I heard: flute start Sections: two springs, the river, forest hunt, peasant wedding, moonlight dance of river nymphs, the river, the rapids, the river at its widest point, Vysehrad the ancient castle Name ______________________________ Number: 7.3 CD 5/51 pg 229 Title: Symphonie Fantastique, 5th mvmt (Dream of a Witch's Sabbath) Composer: Berlioz Genre: program symphony Characteristics Texture: homophonic Text: _______________________________________________________ Voicing/Instrumentation: orchestra What I heard: funeral chimes, clarinet idee fix, trills & grace notes Number: 7.4 website Title: 1812 Overture Composer: Tchaikovsky Genre: concert overture Characteristics Texture: homophonic Text: _______________________________________________________ Voicing/Instrumentation: orchestra What I heard: soft beginning, hunter motive, “Go Napoleon”, the battle Name ______________________________ Number: 7.5 website Title: The Sorcerer's Apprentice
    [Show full text]
  • Chopin's Nocturne Op. 27, No. 2 As a Contribution to the Violist's
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2014 A tale of lovers : Chopin's Nocturne Op. 27, No. 2 as a contribution to the violist's repertory Rafal Zyskowski Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Music Commons Recommended Citation Zyskowski, Rafal, "A tale of lovers : Chopin's Nocturne Op. 27, No. 2 as a contribution to the violist's repertory" (2014). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3366. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3366 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. A TALE OF LOVERS: CHOPIN’S NOCTURNE OP. 27, NO. 2 AS A CONTRIBUTION TO THE VIOLIST’S REPERTORY A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Musical Arts in The School of Music by Rafal Zyskowski B.M., Louisiana State University, 2008 M.M., Indiana University, 2010 May 2014 ©2014 Rafal Zyskowski All rights reserved ii Dedicated to Ms. Dorothy Harman, my best friend ever iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS As always in life, the final outcome of our work results from a contribution that was made in one way or another by a great number of people. Thus, I want to express my gratitude to at least some of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpreting Tempo and Rubato in Chopin's Music
    Interpreting tempo and rubato in Chopin’s music: A matter of tradition or individual style? Li-San Ting A thesis in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of New South Wales School of the Arts and Media Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences June 2013 ABSTRACT The main goal of this thesis is to gain a greater understanding of Chopin performance and interpretation, particularly in relation to tempo and rubato. This thesis is a comparative study between pianists who are associated with the Chopin tradition, primarily the Polish pianists of the early twentieth century, along with French pianists who are connected to Chopin via pedagogical lineage, and several modern pianists playing on period instruments. Through a detailed analysis of tempo and rubato in selected recordings, this thesis will explore the notions of tradition and individuality in Chopin playing, based on principles of pianism and pedagogy that emerge in Chopin’s writings, his composition, and his students’ accounts. Many pianists and teachers assume that a tradition in playing Chopin exists but the basis for this notion is often not made clear. Certain pianists are considered part of the Chopin tradition because of their indirect pedagogical connection to Chopin. I will investigate claims about tradition in Chopin playing in relation to tempo and rubato and highlight similarities and differences in the playing of pianists of the same or different nationality, pedagogical line or era. I will reveal how the literature on Chopin’s principles regarding tempo and rubato relates to any common or unique traits found in selected recordings.
    [Show full text]
  • College Orchestra Director Programming Decisions Regarding Classical Twentieth-Century Music Mark D
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Dissertations The Graduate School Summer 2017 College orchestra director programming decisions regarding classical twentieth-century music Mark D. Taylor James Madison University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/diss201019 Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Taylor, Mark D., "College orchestra director programming decisions regarding classical twentieth-century music" (2017). Dissertations. 132. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/diss201019/132 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the The Graduate School at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. College Orchestra Director Programming Decisions Regarding Classical Twentieth-Century Music Mark David Taylor A Doctor of Musical Arts Document submitted to the Graduate Faculty of JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the degree of Doctor of Musical Arts School of Music August 2017 FACULTY COMMITTEE Committee Chair: Dr. Eric Guinivan Committee Members/ Readers: Dr. Mary Jean Speare Mr. Foster Beyers Acknowledgments Dr. Robert McCashin, former Director of Orchestras and Professor of Orchestral Conducting at James Madison University (JMU) as well as a co-founder of College Orchestra Directors Association (CODA), served as an important sounding-board as the study emerged. Dr. McCashin was particularly helpful in pointing out the challenges of undertaking such a study. I would have been delighted to have Dr. McCashin serve as the chair of my doctoral committee, but he retired from JMU before my study was completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Rachmaninoff's Piano Works and Diasporic Identity 1890-1945: Compositional Revision and Discourse
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 8-7-2018 12:30 PM Rachmaninoff's Piano Works and Diasporic Identity 1890-1945: Compositional Revision and Discourse Renee MacKenzie The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Nolan, Catherine The University of Western Ontario Sylvestre, Stéphan The University of Western Ontario Kinton, Leslie The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Music A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Doctor of Musical Arts © Renee MacKenzie 2018 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Music Performance Commons Recommended Citation MacKenzie, Renee, "Rachmaninoff's Piano Works and Diasporic Identity 1890-1945: Compositional Revision and Discourse" (2018). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 5572. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/5572 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract This monograph examines the post-exile, multi-version works of Sergei Rachmaninoff with a view to unravelling the sophisticated web of meanings and values attached to them. Compositional revision is an important and complex aspect of creating musical meaning. Considering revision offers an important perspective on the construction and circulation of meanings and discourses attending Rachmaninoff’s music. While Rachmaninoff achieved international recognition during the 1890s as a distinctively Russian musician, I argue that Rachmaninoff’s return to certain compositions through revision played a crucial role in the creation of a narrative and set of tropes representing “Russian diaspora” following the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Rachmaninoff's Early Piano Works and the Traces of Chopin's Influence
    Rachmaninoff’s Early Piano works and the Traces of Chopin’s Influence: The Morceaux de Fantaisie, Op.3 & The Moments Musicaux, Op.16 A document submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Musical Arts in the Division of Keyboard Studies of the College-Conservatory of Music by Sanghie Lee P.D., Indiana University, 2011 B.M., M.M., Yonsei University, Korea, 2007 Committee Chair: Jonathan Kregor, Ph.D. Abstract This document examines two of Sergei Rachmaninoff’s early piano works, Morceaux de Fantaisie, Op.3 (1892) and Moments Musicaux, Opus 16 (1896), as they relate to the piano works of Frédéric Chopin. The five short pieces that comprise Morceaux de Fantaisie and the six Moments Musicaux are reminiscent of many of Chopin’s piano works; even as the sets broadly build on his character genres such as the nocturne, barcarolle, etude, prelude, waltz, and berceuse, they also frequently are modeled on or reference specific Chopin pieces. This document identifies how Rachmaninoff’s sets specifically and generally show the influence of Chopin’s style and works, while exploring how Rachmaninoff used Chopin’s models to create and present his unique compositional identity. Through this investigation, performers can better understand Chopin’s influence on Rachmaninoff’s piano works, and therefore improve their interpretations of his music. ii Copyright © 2018 by Sanghie Lee All rights reserved iii Acknowledgements I cannot express my heartfelt gratitude enough to my dear teacher James Tocco, who gave me devoted guidance and inspirational teaching for years.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher Notes on Russian Music and Composers Prokofiev Gave up His Popularity and Wrote Music to Please Stalin. He Wrote Music
    Teacher Notes on Russian Music and Composers x Prokofiev gave up his popularity and wrote music to please Stalin. He wrote music to please the government. x Stravinsky is known as the great inventor of Russian music. x The 19th century was a time of great musical achievement in Russia. This was the time period in which “The Five” became known. They were: Rimsky-Korsakov (most influential, 1844-1908) Borodin Mussorgsky Cui Balakirev x Tchaikovsky (1840-’93) was not know as one of “The Five”. x Near the end of the Stalinist Period Prokofiev and Shostakovich produced music so peasants could listen to it as they worked. x During the 17th century, Russian music consisted of sacred vocal music or folk type songs. x Peter the Great liked military music (such as the drums). He liked trumpet music, church bells and simple Polish music. He did not like French or Italian music. Nor did Peter the Great like opera. Notes Compiled by Carol Mohrlock 90 Igor Fyodorovich Stravinsky (1882-1971) I gor Stravinsky was born on June 17, 1882, in Oranienbaum, near St. Petersburg, Russia, he died on April 6, 1971, in New York City H e was Russian-born composer particularly renowned for such ballet scores as The Firebird (performed 1910), Petrushka (1911), The Rite of Spring (1913), and Orpheus (1947). The Russian period S travinsky's father, Fyodor Ignatyevich Stravinsky, was a bass singer of great distinction, who had made a successful operatic career for himself, first at Kiev and later in St. Petersburg. Igor was the third of a family of four boys.
    [Show full text]
  • Steinway Society 2018-2019 Program
    Music You Love. Artists You’ll Cherish. STEINWAY SOCIETY The Bay Area Piano Concerts February 2019–May 2019 Vyacheslav Gryaznov SteinwaySociety.com Benjamin Grosvenor Nikolay Khozyainov Charlie Albright PIANO CONCERTS 2018–2019 President’s Letter Dear Patron, Zlata Chochieva Saturday, September 15, 2018, 7:30 p.m. Steinway Society concerts continue this season with four Trianon Theatre, San Jose nationally and internationally acclaimed pianists. In this, our 24th year, we are honoring the Romantic era Manasse/Nakamatsu Duo (1825–1900), which saw the birth of the first celebrity Saturday, October 13, 2018, 7:30 p.m. pianists. While democratic ideals and the Industrial McAfee Performing Arts and Lecture Center, Saratoga Revolution changed the fabric of Western society, musicians were freed of dependence on the church and royal courts. Henry Kramer Musical forms were expanded to express “romanticism,” including artistic individualism and dramatic ranges of emotion. The spirit of Sunday, November 11, 2018, 2:30 p.m. romanticism infuses this 24th Steinway Society season. Trianon Theatre, San Jose The season continues with 21st-century Romantic pianist, Vyacheslav Sandra Wright Shen Gryaznov, who brings us gorgeous music of Rachmaninoff. Benjamin Grosvenor follows with music of Schumann, Janácek, and Prokofiev, Saturday, December 8, 2018, 7:30 p.m. who brought a new vision to romanticism. Nikolay Khozyainov treats Trianon Theatre, San Jose us to additional works of Chopin, Beethoven, and Rachmaninoff. Charlie Albright concludes the season by surveying romanticism’s variations, Kate Liu and by improvising, as did the great pianists of the Romantic era. Saturday, January 12, 2019, 7:30 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Music Past and Present
    Understanding Music Past and Present N. Alan Clark, PhD Thomas Heflin, DMA Jeffrey Kluball, EdD Elizabeth Kramer, PhD Understanding Music Past and Present N. Alan Clark, PhD Thomas Heflin, DMA Jeffrey Kluball, EdD Elizabeth Kramer, PhD Dahlonega, GA Understanding Music: Past and Present is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribu- tion-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license allows you to remix, tweak, and build upon this work, even commercially, as long as you credit this original source for the creation and license the new creation under identical terms. If you reuse this content elsewhere, in order to comply with the attribution requirements of the license please attribute the original source to the University System of Georgia. NOTE: The above copyright license which University System of Georgia uses for their original content does not extend to or include content which was accessed and incorpo- rated, and which is licensed under various other CC Licenses, such as ND licenses. Nor does it extend to or include any Special Permissions which were granted to us by the rightsholders for our use of their content. Image Disclaimer: All images and figures in this book are believed to be (after a rea- sonable investigation) either public domain or carry a compatible Creative Commons license. If you are the copyright owner of images in this book and you have not authorized the use of your work under these terms, please contact the University of North Georgia Press at [email protected] to have the content removed. ISBN: 978-1-940771-33-5 Produced by: University System of Georgia Published by: University of North Georgia Press Dahlonega, Georgia Cover Design and Layout Design: Corey Parson For more information, please visit http://ung.edu/university-press Or email [email protected] TABLE OF C ONTENTS MUSIC FUNDAMENTALS 1 N.
    [Show full text]
  • Bob Houston, Percussion DMA Recital Assisted by Carol Houston, Piano Conrad Bauschka, Trumpet Dr
    37? .A/g/J Ato, /£5"^ A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SELECTED KEYBOARD COMPOSITIONS OF CHOPIN, BRAHMS, AND FRANCK AS TRANSCRIBED FOR THE MARIMBA BY CLAIR OMAR MUSSER, EARL HATCH, AND FRANK MAC CALLUM TOGETHER WITH THREE RECITALS OF WORKS BY BARTOK, CRUMB, MIYOSHI, KRAFT AND OTHERS DISSERTATION Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Musical Arts Robert E. Houston, B.A., M. M Denton, Texas December, 1980 Houston, Robert E., Jr., A Comparative Analysis of Selected Keyboard Compositions of Chopin, Brahms, and Franck as Transcribed for the Marimba by Clair Omar Musser, Earl Hatch, and Frank Mac Callum Together with Three Recitals of Works by Bartok, Crumb, Miyoshi, Kraft and Others. Doctor of Musical Arts, December, 1980, 53 pp., 14 illustrations, bibli- ography, 27 titles. This study is an examination of Earl Hatch and Clair Musser's transcriptions for marimba of Chopin's Waltz, Opus 64 No. 1, Musser's arrangement of Chopin's Mazurka, Opus 17 No. 4, Hatch's setting of Brahms' Hungarian Dance No. 5, and Frank Mac Callum's treatment of Franck's "Chorale" from the Prelude, Chorale and Fugue. Additionally, the role of the transcription during the Romantic Period, the historical development of the marimba tran- scription, and performance considerations of the specific works presented are discussed. Some of the most successful marimba transcriptions are for the marimba or mallet ensemble. Today writers are more judicious in their choice of subject matter for ensemble transcrip- tion, drawing upon a variety of musical styles from differing musical periods.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIXES Appendix I
    APPENDIXES Appendix I CHRONOLOGICAL SEQUENCE OF PUBLICATION I8I7 Military March (lost) November Polonaise in G minor (republ. I927) June Rondo, Op. I I826 Mazurkas in B fiat and G ( wd versions: republ. I 8 5I) Polonaise in B fiat minor (republ. I 879) I828 February Rondo ala Mazur, Op. 5 I830 January Variations for PF. and Orch., Op. 2 I83J Autumn Introduction and Polonaise, Op. 3 I832 December PF. Trio in G minor, Op. 8 3 Nocturnes, Op. 9 4 Mazurkas, Op. 6 5 Mazurkas, Op. 7 July Etudes, Op. Io PF. Concerto, Op. I I Grand Duo (Robert /e Diable) November Variations (Ludovic), Op. 12 December 3 Nocturnes, Op. 15 I77 APPENDIX I 1834 March Introduction and Rondo, Op. I 6 4 Mazurkas, Op. I 7 April Fantaisie on Polish Airs, Op. I 3 June Waltz, Op. I8 July Rondo, 'Krakowiak', Op. I4 October Bolero, Op. I9 February Scherzo, Op. 20 I836 January 4 Mazurkas, Op. 24 April PF. Concerto, Op. 2 I May 2 Nocturnes, Op. 2 7 June Ballade, Op. 2 3 July 2 Polonaises, Op. 26 August Andante spianato and Polonaise, Op. 22 2 Songs ('Zycenie' and 'Wojak'), pub!. anonymously October Etudes, Op. 2 5 December 4 Mazurkas, Op. 30 Scherzo, Op. 3 1 2 Nocturnes, Op. 3 z I838 October 4 Mazurkas, Op. 3 3 December 3 Waltzes, Op. 34 1839 June Hexameron, Variation in E major Preludes, Op. 28 May Sonata, Op. 3 5 Impromptu, Op. 36 June 2 Nocturnes, Op. 37 Waltz in A flat, Op. 42 September Ballade, Op. 38 October Scherzo, Op.
    [Show full text]
  • FRÉDÉRIC CHOPIN the 1981 Baldwin Recordings
    Abbey Simon, Jorge Bolet and Earl Wild c.1979 FRÉDÉRIC CHOPIN The 1981= Baldwin Recordings With the exception of three pieces–the Fantasie, the Ballade, and the Andante Spianato and Grand Polonaise Brillante–this recording features rel- atively brief works, some of them remarkably so, demonstrating to a refined degree the extent to which Frédéric Chopin was a master of the small form. This may be a function of the fact that, though he performed in public con- cert halls, Chopin most often performed for friends in intimate salons. Fantasie in F minor, Op. 49 (1841) The heroic Fantasie in F minor is one of Chopin’s largest and most epic works for solo piano. If its scale and scope are unusual for him, so is its form, being loose, extended, and improvisatory, and having numerous melodies. Unlike many romantics, Chopin’s music is generally not narrative or programmatic, and while it is personal, it remains pure art. Nevertheless, a story has been associated with the Fantasie. The composer and pianist Franz Liszt relates: The year is 1841 and Chopin is seated at the Pleyel grand piano in Madame George Sand’s salon in Nohant, France, where they spent – 2 – their summers. A knock is heard at the door and Madame Sand enters. With her are Liszt, Camille Pleyel, the wife of the piano manufacturer, and one or two other friends, perhaps the cellist Franchomme and the singer Pauline Viardot-Garcia. Some quarreling ensues, and then reconciliation. If Liszt’s tale is correct, this scene led to Chopin’s composition of the Fantasie.
    [Show full text]