World War One
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The King's African Rifles
The King's African Rifles Introduction Further to my article on The Battle of Tanga - 1914, I have studied the various African units participating in the First World War, and here follows a brief overview of one of the most famous African units - The King's African Rifles. The King's African Rifles, ca. 1916 1). Regimental Badge The King's African Rifles. From Regimental Badges by T.J. Edwards, Gale & Polden Limited, 1951. Formation The regiment was formed on 1 January 1902, and combined a number of units from various British East African dependencies - Somaliland, British East Africa (from July 1920: Kenya), Uganda and Nyasaland. At the formation, The King's African Rifles included the following battalions, which in principle existed until the independence of the various colonies in the 1960'ies. King's African Rifles2) Derived from Remarks 1st (Central Africa) 1st Battalion Central Africa Regiment. The Malawi Rifles (1964) Battalion 2nd (Central Africa) 2nd Battalion Central Africa Regiment Disbanded in 1962 Battalion 3rd (East Africa) Battalion East Africa Rifles (British East Africa) The Kenya Rifles (1963) 4th (Uganda) Battalion Uganda Rifles, from various African The Uganda Rifles (1962) companies 5th (Uganda) Battalion Uganda Rifles, from various Indian The Kenya Rifles (1963) companies 6th (Somaliland) Battalion Raised by local units in Somaliland Disbanded in 1910 6th (Tanganyika) Battalion Formed from ex-German askaris in 1917-18 The Tanganyika Rifles (1961) At the formation the regiment included 4.683 men, including 104 British officers. During the First World War the regiment grew into 22 battalions, consisting in July 1918 of 1,193 British Officers, 1,497 British Non-Commissioned Officers, and 30.658 Africans. -
Portugal in the Great War: the African Theatre of Operations (1914- 1918)
Portugal in the Great War: the African Theatre of Operations (1914- 1918) Nuno Lemos Pires1 https://academiamilitar.academia.edu/NunoPires At the onset of the Great War, none of the colonial powers were prepared to do battle in Africa. None had stated their intentions to do so and there were no indications that one of them would take the step of attacking its neighbours. The War in Africa has always been considered a secondary theatre of operations by all conflicting nations but, as well shall see, not by the political discourse of the time. This discourse was important, especially in Portugal, but the transition from policy to strategic action was almost the opposite of what was said, as we shall demonstrate in the following chapters. It is both difficult and deeply simple to understand the opposing interests of the different nations in Africa. It is difficult because they are all quite different from one another. It is also deeply simple because some interests have always been clear and self-evident. But we will return to our initial statement. When war broke out in Europe and in the rest of the World, none of the colonial powers were prepared to fight one another. The forces, the policy, the security forces, the traditions, the strategic practices were focused on domestic conflict, that is, on disturbances of the public order, local and regional upheaval and insurgency by groups or movements (Fendall, 2014: 15). Therefore, when the war began, the warning signs of this lack of preparation were immediately visible. Let us elaborate. First, each colonial power had more than one policy. -
Richard Duncan MM Basic Information [As Recorded on Local Memorial Or by CWGC] Name As Recorded on Local Memorial Or by CWGC: R
131: Richard Duncan MM Basic Information [as recorded on local memorial or by CWGC] Name as recorded on local memorial or by CWGC: R. Duncan MM Rank: Private Battalion / Regiment: 1st / 4th Bn. Cheshire Regiment Service Number: 201007 Date of Death: 12 October 1919 Age at Death: ? Buried / Commemorated at: Neston Cemetery, Raby Road, Neston Additional information given by CWGC: None Richard Duncan was the (probably) sixth child of agricultural worker / labourer Thomas and Annie Duncan of Parkgate. Thomas Duncan married Annie Hobson at St John’s Church, Liverpool, in late 1874 and they had twelve children of whom ten survived. In 1881, before Richard was born, and in 1891, the family was living in Parkgate: 1881 census (extract) – Parkgate Thomas Duncan 26 agricultural labourer born Parkgate Annie 27 born Ripple, Warwicks. Thomas M.C. 7 born Liverpool Margaret A. 5 born Parkgate Ellen 2 born Parkgate Charles F. 9 months born Parkgate Richard Duncan, and older brother John, were both baptised at Neston Parish Church on 30 January 1885. 1891 census (extract) – Parkgate Thomas Duncan 38 labourer born Neston Annie 37 born Ripple, Warwicks. Thomas 17 labourer born Liverpool Margaret A. 15 born Neston Ellen 12 born Neston Charles F. 10 born Neston John 8 born Neston Richard 6 born Neston William 1 born Neston Cecilia M. 2 months born Neston Page | 1417 In 1901 the family was still in Parkgate and Richard, 19, was a domestic gardener: 1901 census (extract) – Parkgate Thomas Duncan 50 contractor’s carter, farm born Parkgate Annie 49 born Warwicks. John 21 farm labourer born Parkgate Richard 19 gardener, domestic born Parkgate William 13 born Parkgate Margery 10 born Parkgate Joseph 8 born Parkgate Edith 7 born Parkgate In 1901 Thomas M C Duncan, 28, was a platelayer lodging with fisherman Thomas and Clara Bushell in Parkgate. -
My Reminiscences of East Africa
My 'Reminiscences of East Africa .J General VOII Lettow-Vorbeck. [f'runJi:spiect. :My nEMINISCENCES I OF EAST AFRICA :: CJ3y General von Leitoto- Vorbeck With Portrait. 22 Maps and Sketch.Maps. and 13 Vraw;ngs 13y General von Lettoui- Vorbechs Adjutant LONDON: HURST AND BLACKETT. LTD. PATERNOSTER HOUSE, E.C. f I I I I ,.\ I PREFACE N all the German colon.ies,t~ough but a few d~ca~es old, a life I full of promise was discerruble. \Ve were beginning to under• stand the national value of our colonial possessions; settlers and capital were venturing in; industries and factories were beginning to flourish. Compared with that of other nations, the colonizing process of Germany had progressed peacefully and steadily, and the inhabitants had confidence in the justice of German administration. This development had barely commenced when it was destroyed by the world war. In spite of all tangible proofs to the contrary, an unjustifiable campaign of falsehood is being conducted in order to make the world believe that the Germans lacked colonizing talent and were cruel to the natives. A small force, mainly composed of these very natives, opposed this development. Almost without any external means of coercion, even without immediate payment, this force, with its numerous native followers, faithfully followed its German leaders throughout the whole of the prolonged war against a more than hundredfold superiority. When the armistice came it was still fit to fight, and imbued with the best soldierly spirit. That is a fact which cannot be controverted, and is in itself a sufficient answer to the hostile mis-statements. -
Why Were the British/Allied Forces Unable to Dislodge the Renowned German General Paul Von Lettow-Vorbeck in East Afri…
7/1/2020 #GreatWarInAfrica – Why were the British/Allied forces unable to dislodge the renowned German General Paul von Lettow-Vorbeck in East Afri… Blog Editor August 4th, 2014 #GreatWarInAfrica – Why were the British/Allied forces unable to dislodge the renowned German General Paul von Lettow-Vorbeck in East Africa? 2 comments Estimated reading time: 5 minutes Anne Samson looks at the reasons why ten British/Allied commanders could not defeat the renowned German General, Paul von Lettow Vorbeck in East Africa during World War 1. Most people, when you mention East Africa and World War One, immediately refer to German General Paul von Lettow-Vorbeck and Allied commander General Jan Smuts. However, what is not generally known is that Smuts served in the theatre for only 11 months and was one of ten Allied commanders who led forces against Lettow-Vorbeck. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/africaatlse/2014/08/04/greatwarinafrica-why-were-the-britishallied-forces-unable-to-dislodge-the-renowned-german-general-paul-vo… 1/7 7/1/2020 #GreatWarInAfrica – Why were the British/Allied forces unable to dislodge the renowned German General Paul von Lettow-Vorbeck in East Afri… Command of the British forces in East Africa was split between the Colonial and India Offices with the War Office keeping a watchful eye. The Admiralty was strategically involved, moving troops, blockading and engaging the enemy on water. So was the Foreign Office, responsible for keeping allies informed and on board despite differing, and sometimes conflicting, aims. Fierce rivals on the battlefield, General Paul von Lettow-Vorbeck (L) and General Jan Smuts (R) became great friends later in life There had been some discussion about keeping the theatre neutral but this was felt to be impossible given the actions which had occurred by mid-September 1914. -
A Comparative Case Study to Test Whether Automatic Weapons Can Disproportionately Benefit Irregular Forces
University of Mississippi eGrove Honors College (Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors Theses Honors College) Winter 12-4-2020 Diabolus Ex Machina? A Comparative Case Study to Test Whether Automatic Weapons Can Disproportionately Benefit Irregular Forces Harrison Durland Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis Part of the Defense and Security Studies Commons, Military History Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Science and Technology Studies Commons Recommended Citation Durland, Harrison, "Diabolus Ex Machina? A Comparative Case Study to Test Whether Automatic Weapons Can Disproportionately Benefit Irregular Forces" (2020). Honors Theses. 1860. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis/1860 This Undergraduate Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College (Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College) at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Durland 1 Diabolus Ex Machina? A Comparative Case Study to Test Whether Automatic Weapons Can Disproportionately Benefit Irregular Forces Harrison Durland November 17, 2020 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for completion of the Bachelor of Arts degree in International Studies Croft Institute for International Studies University of Mississippi Advisor: Dr. Benjamin Jones Second Reader: Dr. William Schenck Third Reader: Dr. Susan Allen Durland 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 5 Abstract 6 Introduction and Overview 7 Chapter I: Literature Review 10 Explaining Insurgent Success and Outcome Trends 10 Strategies, Tactics, and Force Employment 11 Politics: Resolve, Restraints, and Responsibilities 12 Other Explanations: External Support and Geography 13 Summary of Explanations and the Reason for Further Study 14 Lyall and Wilson: Mechanization vs. -
An Appreciation of Larks
angels in CAMOUFLAGE An appreciation of larks arks have inspired poets as glorious as William Wordsworth, John Milton and Percy Bysshe Shelley, yet most birders consider them only as bothersome LBJs. Much maligned, they are often viewed Las little more than a boring identification chore. However, larks have a history as old as Africa itself. Some members have the most remarkable survival techniques in the avian world, and they sing and display like angels. So is there more to these sombre brown birds than first meets the eye? Shelley thought so, and so do I, writes KEITH BARNES. ALBERT FRONEMAN arks are a massive identification validity of geographical races is not ost birders in southern It isn’t just the casual birder who has problems challenge and, together with pip- orthodox. Having been a sinner myself, Africa are familiar with the its and cisticolas, they wear the I can expiate my indiscretions without Spike-heeled Lark. A short- distinguishing between larks. Ornithologists have unwelcome mantle of ‘Africa’s exultation and in repentance.’ Conversely, tailed, upright lark found in LLBJs’. Most species use open habitats in Gordon Maclean wrote, ‘It is doubtful Ma wide variety of open-country habitats, been arguing about them for more than 100 years desert, semi-desert and grasslands, and are whether the matter [of lark systemat- its white outer-tail tips, stocky frame and characterised by a great deal of morpho- ics] will ever be satisfactorily resolved.’ sociable behaviour render it one of the its finder. As the bird is highly resident Above In the course of one of the more logical convergence. -
Supplement to the London Gazette, 6 Maech, 1915. 2349
SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, 6 MAECH, 1915. 2349 John W. Graham. Lieutenants in the Army to be Second Lieu- William A. Maclean. tenants. Dated 7th March, 1915. John G. Everard. G. V. Wellesley. Francis Weatherby. 4th Battalion, The Highland Light Infantry, •Sir Henry Thomas Gibson-Craig1, Bt., late East Riding of Yorkshire; Quartermaster and Lieutenant, 3rd Battalion, The Royal Scots Honorary Major Frederick Burch to be (Lothian Regiment), to be Lieutenant. seconded. Dated 19th January, 1915. Dated 7th March, 1915. ROYAL FIELD ARTILLERY. 3rd Battalion, The Royal Munster Fusiliers, Cheshire Brigade; Private Alexander John Captain Thomas J. Goodlake resigns his Mathieson, from Signal Troop, South Wales commission on account of ill-health. Dated Mounted Brigade, to be Second Lieutenant. 7th March, 1915. Dated 7th March, 1915. SUPPLEMENTARY TO REGULAR UNITS OR CORPS. 3rd West Lancashire Brigade. ROYAL FLYING CORPS. Captain Cecil H. Brunner, from the 7th Military Wing, Second Lieutenant Bentfield C. Battalion, The King's (Liverpool Regiment), Hucks to be Lieutenant. Dated 15th Feb- to be Captain (temporary). Dated 7th ruary, 1915. March, 1915. ROYAL ARMY MEDICAL CORPS. The undermentioned Second Lieutenants Lieutenant John Brumwell resigns his to be Lieutenants: — commission, ion appointment to the Royal Henry N. Shelmerdine. Dated 15th, Sep- Naval Volunteer Reserve. Dated 26th tember, 1914. December, 1914. Albert M. Jacob. Dated 24th October, 1914. Thomas B. Bicket. Dated 19th Novem- ber, 1914. William H. Bragg. Dated 1st February, War Office, 1915. 6th March, 1915. Edward S. McClintock. Dated 1st February, 1915. TERRITORIAL FORCE. Martin Ravenscroft. Dated 1st February, 1915. HONOURABLE ARTILLERY COMPANY. 4:th West Lancashire (Howitzer) Brigade; "A" Battery (1st City of London Horse James Norman Ritchie to be Second Lieu- Artillery); the undermentioned to be Second tenant. -
Experience, Memory, and the Interwar Publishing of the Egyptian Expeditionary Force in Postwar Britain, 1915-1939
“Buried Alive”: Experience, Memory, and the Interwar Publishing of the Egyptian Expeditionary Force in Postwar Britain, 1915-1939 JUSTIN FANTAUZZO Abstract Over 450,000 British soldiers fought as part of the Egyptian Expeditionary Force during the First World War. Between 1915-1918, they fought their way across the Sinai Peninsula, into southern Palestine, captured Jerusalem, and overran the Turkish Army, leading to the sur - render of the Ottoman Empire in October 1918. Despite being the war’s most successful sideshow, the Egypt and Palestine campaign struggled to gain popular attention and has largely been excluded from First World War scholarship. This article argues that returning soldiers used war books to rehabilitate the campaign’s public profile and to renegotiate the meaning of wartime service in interwar Britain. The result of sporadic press attention and censorship during the war, the British public’s under - standing of the campaign was poor. Periodic access to home front news meant that most soldiers likely learnt of their absence from Britain’s war narrative during the war years. Confronting the belief that the cam - paign, prior to the capture of Jerusalem, was an inactive theatre of war, British soldiers refashioned themselves as military labourers, paving the road to Jerusalem and building the British war machine. As offensive action intensified, soldiers could look to the past to provide meaning to the present. Allusions to the campaign as a crusade were frequently made and used to compete with the moral righteousness of the liberation of Belgium. Résumé Plus de 450 000 soldats britanniques ont participé à la force expédi - tionnaire égyptienne durant la Première Guerre mondiale. -
Frank Medlicott (Meddlicott)
106: Frank Medlicott (Meddlicott) Basic Information [as recorded on local memorial or by CWGC] Name as recorded on local memorial or by CWGC: Frank Medlicott (shown as 'Meddlicott' by CWGC) Rank: Private Battalion / Regiment: 1st / 4th Bn. Cheshire Regiment Service Number: 201540 Date of Death: 01 August 1918 Age at Death: 26 Buried / Commemorated at: Raperie British Cemetery, Villemontoire, Departement de l'Aisne, Picardie, France Additional information given by CWGC: The son of Henry and Martha Meddlicott of Puddington, Birkenhead The name of this family is recorded with several variations including Meddicott, Middlecott, Meddlecott, Medlicot, Medlicott and Meddlicott. Whilst the name recorded on the memorial plaque at St Nicholas, Burton, is Medlicott, the recognised spelling (as given in the two census returns for 1911 which bear this name, and as recorded by the CWGC) is Meddlicott. In this account the spelling Meddlicott will be used within the text although the variants will be used as these appear in documents. Frank Meddlicott was the third and final child of Henry and Martha Meddlicott of Oxfordshire. Henry Meddlicott married Martha Church in the Witney region of Oxfordshire in mid-1882 and by the time of the 1891 census, when they were living in the village of Aston to the west of Oxford, all three children had been born: Henry Medlicot 29 shepherd born Black Bourton, Oxfordshire Martha 29 born Black Bourton, Oxfordshire Mabel 8 born Burford, Oxfordshire George 4 born Black Bourton, Oxfordshire Frank 1 born Clanfield, Oxfordshire At the time of the 1901 census they were still in Aston, probably at the same house: 1901 census (extract) – Bull Street, Aston, Oxfordshire Henry Medlicott 37 shepherd born Black Bourton, Oxon. -
Was Balfour Policy Reversible? the Colonial Office and Palestine, 1921-23
WAS BALFOUR POLICY REVERSIBLE? THE COLONIAL OFFICE AND PALESTINE, 1921-23 SAHAR HUNEIDI This paper focuses on the role played by the Middle East Department of Britain's Colonial Office in shaping Palestine policy from early 1921 to September 1923, when the Mandate for Palestine took effect. It shows the department's efforts to neutralize the growing domestic challenges to the Jewish national home policy and highlights the con- trast between the department's treatment of the successive Arab dele- gations and the privileged access accorded to the Zionists. It concludes that if there were times during this period that the policy could have been overturned, the efforts of the Middle East Department were largely responsible for keeping it on course. DESPITE THE LLOYD GEORGE GOVERNMENT S FIRM EMBRACE of the Balfour Decla- ration as official policy, the first years of British rule in Palestine were marked by a degree of uncertainty. The Jaffa riots of May 1921, after a year of calm, showed the extent to which the Arabs were unreconciled to the "Jew- ish national home" called for in the Balfour Declaration. The British army, which had remained in Palestine as a security force after the establishment of the Civil Administration in July 1920, was openly anti-Zionist. The British press, initially favorable to the Jewish national home policy, had by the early 1920s become increasingly skeptical if not hostile, and a movement opposed to the Balfour Declaration was gaining ground within parliament. When, against this background, a Conservative government came to power at the end of 1922, there seemed a real possibility that the pro-Zionist policy could be reversed, and a spate of government inquiries into that policy continued well into 1923. -
German Colonies
A postal history of the First World War in Africa and its aftermath – German colonies IV Deutsch-Ostafrika / German East Africa (GEA) Ton Dietz ASC Working Paper 119 / 2015 1 Prof. Ton Dietz Director African Studies Centre Leiden [email protected] African Studies Centre P.O. Box 9555 2300 RB Leiden The Netherlands Telephone +31-71-5273372 Fax +31-71-5273344 E-mail [email protected] Website http://www.ascleiden.nl Facebook www.facebook.nl/ascleiden Twitter www.twitter.com/ascleiden Ton Dietz, 2015 2 A postal history of the First World War in Africa and its aftermath Ton Dietz, African Studies Centre Leiden Version February 2015; [email protected] German Colonies WORK IN PROGRESS, SUGGESTIONS WELCOME IV Deutsch-Ostafrika/German East Africa (GEA) Table of Contents Introduction 2 Vorläufer, 1885-1893 4 Witu and Malakote, 1889 7 Ostafrikanische Seeenpost by Schülke & Mayr, 1892 15 Pre-War stamps, 1893-1914 16 Post offices in German East Africa using their own cancelations, 1893-1914 21 The Great War in East Africa, 1914-1919 38 German occupation of Taveta, 1914-1915 43 Postal services in areas still controlled by Germany 43 Wuga / Mafia 47 British occupation of mainland Tanganyika 51 British Nyasaland Forces and G.E.A. 53 Belgian occupation of Ruanda and Urundi 55 Portuguese occupation of Kionga 62 Former German East Africa after the Great War 68 Tanganyika 68 Ruanda Urundi 72 Quionga and German revisionist vignettes after the War 74 References 75 3 Introduction Wikipedia about German East Africa and its stamps ´German postal services in German East Africa started on October 4, 1890.