Toxicology of Ω-Fluorocarboxylic Acids
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
EPCRA.Doc Elizabethtown College
Environmental Affairs EMERGENCY PLANNING AND COMMUNITY RIGHT TO KNOW SCOPE: This policy includes all hazardous materials that are stored and/or used on site and for which there is an MSDS required by OSHA 1910:1200 Hazard Communication. PURPOSE: The purpose of this policy is to establish reporting requirements to provide the public with information on the hazardous chemicals used and or stored at the College. It also is intended to facilitate the development of state and local emergency response plans. PROCESS: ♦ The local emergency planning committee has been notified that the Manager of Human Resources & Safety will serve as the Facility Emergency Coordinator. ♦ The College will provide the Local Emergency Planning Committee and the State Emergency Response Commission with all information needed for emergency planning. ♦ The College will collect and maintain copies of all MSDS(s) required under OSHA 1910:1200 Hazard Communication. The College also subscribes to an MSDS On Demand service so that MSDS(s) will be available at all times. ♦ The College has provided the State Emergency Response Commission, the Local Emergency Planning Committee and the local Fire Department with a complete list of hazardous chemicals used/stored at the College in preference to complete sets of MSDS(s). The College will notify the above agencies of significant changes in the inventory levels of extremely hazardous substances (EHS). ♦ As a matter of practice the College will maintain inventory levels of EHS(s) campus-wide below the Threshold Planning Quantities (TPQ) or 500 lbs, whichever is less, whenever possible. The exception to this will be Sulfuric Acid because of its presence in batteries. -
Basic Aspects of Fluorine in Chemistry and Biology
Introduction: Basic Aspects of Fluorine in Chemistry and Biology COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL 1 Unique Properties of Fluorine and Their Relevance to Medicinal Chemistry and Chemical Biology Takashi Yamazaki , Takeo Taguchi , and Iwao Ojima 1.1 Fluorine - Substituent Effects on the Chemical, Physical and Pharmacological Properties of Biologically Active Compounds The natural abundance of fl uorine as fl uorite, fl uoroapatite, and cryolite is considered to be at the same level as that of nitrogen on the basis of the Clarke number of 0.03. However, only 12 organic compounds possessing this special atom have been found in nature to date (see Figure 1.1) [1] . Moreover, this number goes down to just fi ve different types of com- pounds when taking into account that eight ω - fl uorinated fatty acids are from the same plant [1] . [Note: Although it was claimed that naturally occurring fl uoroacetone was trapped as its 2,4 - dinitrohydrazone, it is very likely that this compound was fl uoroacetal- dehyde derived from fl uoroacetic acid [1] . Thus, fl uoroacetone is not included here.] In spite of such scarcity, enormous numbers of synthetic fl uorine - containing com- pounds have been widely used in a variety of fi elds because the incorporation of fl uorine atom(s) or fl uorinated group(s) often furnishes molecules with quite unique properties that cannot be attained using any other element. Two of the most notable examples in the fi eld of medicinal chemistry are 9α - fl uorohydrocortisone (an anti - infl ammatory drug) [2] and 5 - fl uorouracil (an anticancer drug) [3], discovered and developed in 1950s, in which the introduction of just a single fl uorine atom to the corresponding natural products brought about remarkable pharmacological properties. -
Downloads/DL Praevention/Fachwissen/Gefahrstoffe/TOXIKOLOGI SCHE BEWERTUNGEN/Bewertungen/Toxbew072-L.Pdf
Distribution Agreement In presenting this thesis or dissertation as a partial fulfillment of the requirements for an advanced degree from Emory University, I hereby grant to Emory University and its agents the non-exclusive license to archive, make accessible, and display my thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known, including display on the world wide web. I understand that I may select some access restrictions as part of the online submission of this thesis or dissertation. I retain all ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis or dissertation. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation. Signature: _____________________________ ______________ Jedidiah Samuel Snyder Date Statistical analysis of concentration-time extrapolation factors for acute inhalation exposures to hazardous substances By Jedidiah S. Snyder Master of Public Health Global Environmental Health _________________________________________ P. Barry Ryan, Ph.D. Committee Chair _________________________________________ Eugene Demchuk, Ph.D. Committee Member _________________________________________ Paige Tolbert, Ph.D. Committee Member Statistical analysis of concentration-time extrapolation factors for acute inhalation exposures to hazardous substances By Jedidiah S. Snyder Bachelor of Science in Engineering, B.S.E. The University of Iowa 2010 Thesis Committee Chair: P. Barry Ryan, Ph.D. An abstract of A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Rollins School of Public Health of Emory University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Public Health in Global Environmental Health 2015 Abstract Statistical analysis of concentration-time extrapolation factors for acute inhalation exposures to hazardous substances By Jedidiah S. -
A Nevek-Endinc Problem
tssN1562-5192 h#@ffi&gdtu Ministry of Agriculture,Water and Forestry,Directorate of AgriculturalResearch and Training,Private Bag 13 184, Windhoek No 90April 2005 D i c h ap e t alunt cy ttto s utlt (PO I S O N-LEAF lC I F'BLAAR) : A NEVEK-ENDINCPROBLEM INTRODUCTION Dichapetalumcymosum, known as poison-leafin English(E,d.'s note: accordingto the Afr./Eng. BilingualDictionary by Bosmanet al. 1988)but morecommonly referred to by itsAfrikaans common name,giJblactr or magou,is an extremelypoisonous plant that kills livestock.In Namibia,gifblaar occursto the eastand north-eastofthe countryand is confinedmainly to the fine sandysoils ofthe Kalaharigeological system underlain with Karoobasalt (Opperman & La Grange1969). According to Correia& Van Rensburg(2000), the generalecological characteristics of the distributionarea of gifblaarare soils that aresandy, well-drained and deficient in nutrients.Gifblaar grows in association with treessuch as various Combretumcollinum (C. mechowianumO. Hoffm.), Burkea africana and Terminaliasericea (Du Plooy 1972;YanVuuren 1960). LITERATUREREVIEW The first recordingof gifblaarpoisoning was in 1890, althoughresearch on it only commencedin 191l0 (SWAA l96l). Steyn's(1928) study and descriptionof the Gifblaarplant symptomsof gifblaarpoisoning - its toxicology- were complernentedby Leemann's( 1 935) work on theanatomy, motphology and physiology of the plant.Nearly a decadelateq Marais ( 1943)isolated and synthesised monofluoroacetate asthe activetoxic compoundin theplant. This breakthrough enabled further research on theplant's toxicologyand pharmacology.Nonetheless, by the 1960s,the vaguenessin the literature Cluster of gifblaar leaves regardingthe treatmentof poisonedanimals was being lamented (SWAA 1961).And despite "the fuftherresearch, Remington's (1 935) despair that hopeoffinding anyspecific prophylactic or curativesubstance (antidote) for use in gifblaarpoisoning has become very remote"remains true today. -
"Fluorine Compounds, Organic," In: Ullmann's Encyclopedia Of
Article No : a11_349 Fluorine Compounds, Organic GU¨ NTER SIEGEMUND, Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft, Frankfurt, Federal Republic of Germany WERNER SCHWERTFEGER, Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft, Frankfurt, Federal Republic of Germany ANDREW FEIRING, E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Delaware, United States BRUCE SMART, E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Delaware, United States FRED BEHR, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States HERWARD VOGEL, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States BLAINE MCKUSICK, E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Delaware, United States 1. Introduction....................... 444 8. Fluorinated Carboxylic Acids and 2. Production Processes ................ 445 Fluorinated Alkanesulfonic Acids ...... 470 2.1. Substitution of Hydrogen............. 445 8.1. Fluorinated Carboxylic Acids ......... 470 2.2. Halogen – Fluorine Exchange ......... 446 8.1.1. Fluorinated Acetic Acids .............. 470 2.3. Synthesis from Fluorinated Synthons ... 447 8.1.2. Long-Chain Perfluorocarboxylic Acids .... 470 2.4. Addition of Hydrogen Fluoride to 8.1.3. Fluorinated Dicarboxylic Acids ......... 472 Unsaturated Bonds ................. 447 8.1.4. Tetrafluoroethylene – Perfluorovinyl Ether 2.5. Miscellaneous Methods .............. 447 Copolymers with Carboxylic Acid Groups . 472 2.6. Purification and Analysis ............. 447 8.2. Fluorinated Alkanesulfonic Acids ...... 472 3. Fluorinated Alkanes................. 448 8.2.1. Perfluoroalkanesulfonic Acids -
The List of Extremely Hazardous Substances)
APPENDIX A (THE LIST OF EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES) THRESHOLD REPORTABLE INVENTORY RELEASE QUANTITY QUANTITY CAS NUMBER CHEMICAL NAME (POUNDS) (POUNDS) 75-86-5 ACETONE CYANOHYDRIN 500 10 1752-30-3 ACETONE THIOSEMICARBAZIDE 500/500 1,000 107-02-8 ACROLEIN 500 1 79-06-1 ACRYLAMIDE 500/500 5,000 107-13-1 ACRYLONITRILE 500 100 814-68-6 ACRYLYL CHLORIDE 100 100 111-69-3 ADIPONITRILE 500 1,000 116-06-3 ALDICARB 100/500 1 309-00-2 ALDRIN 500/500 1 107-18-6 ALLYL ALCOHOL 500 100 107-11-9 ALLYLAMINE 500 500 20859-73-8 ALUMINUM PHOSPHIDE 500 100 54-62-6 AMINOPTERIN 500/500 500 78-53-5 AMITON 500 500 3734-97-2 AMITON OXALATE 100/500 100 7664-41-7 AMMONIA 500 100 300-62-9 AMPHETAMINE 500 1,000 62-53-3 ANILINE 500 5,000 88-05-1 ANILINE,2,4,6-TRIMETHYL- 500 500 7783-70-2 ANTIMONY PENTAFLUORIDE 500 500 1397-94-0 ANTIMYCIN A 500/500 1,000 86-88-4 ANTU 500/500 100 1303-28-2 ARSENIC PENTOXIDE 100/500 1 THRESHOLD REPORTABLE INVENTORY RELEASE QUANTITY QUANTITY CAS NUMBER CHEMICAL NAME (POUNDS) (POUNDS) 1327-53-3 ARSENOUS OXIDE 100/500 1 7784-34-1 ARSENOUS TRICHLORIDE 500 1 7784-42-1 ARSINE 100 100 2642-71-9 AZINPHOS-ETHYL 100/500 100 86-50-0 AZINPHOS-METHYL 10/500 1 98-87-3 BENZAL CHLORIDE 500 5,000 98-16-8 BENZENAMINE, 3-(TRIFLUOROMETHYL)- 500 500 100-14-1 BENZENE, 1-(CHLOROMETHYL)-4-NITRO- 500/500 500 98-05-5 BENZENEARSONIC ACID 10/500 10 3615-21-2 BENZIMIDAZOLE, 4,5-DICHLORO-2-(TRI- 500/500 500 FLUOROMETHYL)- 98-07-7 BENZOTRICHLORIDE 100 10 100-44-7 BENZYL CHLORIDE 500 100 140-29-4 BENZYL CYANIDE 500 500 15271-41-7 BICYCLO[2.2.1]HEPTANE-2-CARBONITRILE,5- -
Compound 1080), Its Pharmacology and Toxicology Ernest Kun
MONOFLUOROACETIC ACID (COMPOUND 1080), ITS PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY ERNEST KUN. Department of Pharmacology, The University of California San Francisco. San Francisco. California 94143 ABSTRACT: The molecular mechanism of toxic action of fluoroacetate is analyzed in the perspective of scientific developments of the past 30 years. Stereospecific enzymatic conversion of fluoroacetate via fluoroacetyl-CoA + oxalacetate to (-)-erythrofluorocitrate in mitochondria is the metabolic pathway that converts the nontoxic fluoroacetate to the toxic intracellular effector molecule. The mode of toxic effect of (-)-erythrofluorocitrate cannot be equated with its reversible inhibitory effect on a mitochondrial enzyme (aconitase) as had been originally thought by Peters (1963) and is still propa~ated in textbooks. Instead, the chemical modification of inner mitochondrial membrane proteins by (-}-erythrofluorocitrate, comprising a novel, as yet incompletely understood biochemical mechanism, is the molecular basis of toxicity. Research in this new area may eventually explain selective {species dependent) toxicity, the development of resistance to this poison and can lead to the scientific basis of the development of antidotes. INTRO DU CTI ON The discovery of detailed mechanism of action of highly toxic agents inevitably reveals new areas of cellular physiology, as first pointed out by Claude Bernard (1). It is evident that if an agent in minute quantities is capable of tenninating life processes, the site of action of the toxic substance has to represent a vitally important biological system. Despite the plausibility of this axiom, only relatively few poisons have been studied in sufficient depth to allow the precise identification of their critical target systems, and their proposed mechanisms of action are frequently borrowed from concepts of a branch of biochemistry that happens to be fashionable at that time. -
Enzymes Quinate Dehydrogenase
THE ABSOLUTTE STEREOCHEMICAL COUtRSE OF CITRIC ACID BIOSYNTHESIS* BY KENNETH R. HANSON AND IRWIN A. RoSEt DEPARTMENTS OF BIOCHEMISTRY OF THE CONNECTICUT AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION AND OF YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, NEW HAVEN Communicated by H. B. Vickery, September 3, 1963 In 1948 Ogston noted that when such symmetrical molecules as citric (or amino- malonic) acid are acted upon by asymmetric enzyme surfaces, pairs of identical groups may well be differentiated.1 Shortly thereafter it was shown, by using labeled substrates, that the two -CH2COOH groups of citric acid could, in fact, be distinguished.2 When citrate is formed from oxaloacetate and acetyl-CoA by citrate synthase (E.C.4.1.3.7, condensing enzyme), and is then treated with aco- nitate hydratase (E.C.4.2.1.3, aconitase) to form cis-aconitate and threo-Dr-iso- citrate, the -CH2COOH ends of these compounds are derived from acetyl-CoA, while the other atoms are derived either from oxaloacetate or water.3-6 The acetyl-CoA-derived group yields acetate when citrate is cleaved by citrate-lyase (E.C.4.1.3.6, citratase),7'8 and acetyl-CoA when citrate is attacked by the citrate cleavage enzyme.9 The nonequivalence of the two -CH2COOH groups is apparent when citric acid is represented as I (heavy line above, dotted lines below the plane of the paper). Carbon atoms 1 and 2 are to 5 and 4 as right arm is to left arm:'0 they cannot be superimposed except by reflection. The same molecule is shown in Emil Fischer projection as II (vertical lines below and horizontal lines above the plane of the paper). -
Fluoroacetate Toxicity Hanover, New Hampshire 03755
Gordon W. Gribble' Dartmouth College Fluoroacetate Toxicity Hanover, New Hampshire 03755 Under the stress of World War I1 chemists in England, Table 1. Toxicities of MFA and Other Toxic Compoundso Germany and their allied countries sought to develop chemicals (independently, of course!) which would inca- pacitate, maim, or kill the enemy. These remarkably suc- cessful researches led to the synthesis and large-scale pro- MFA ... 6 duction of several types of warfare agents: nerve gases, FCHzCOINa 0.2 . mustard gas 0.7 . vesicant agents, tear gases, harassing compounds, and, parathion 10 . perhaps the most frightening of all, water poisons. strychnine 5 0.5 For the latter kind of chemical agent it can be easily NaCN ... 10 envisaged that a secret agent could poison the water sup- DFP (nerve agent) . 4 .nlv . of a large" enemv". ~onulace. with hut a small amount of OTaken from several sources. a toxic chemical. The requirements for a water poison are The dose required to kill 50% of the animals by subcutaneous strineent: it should he colorless. odorless. soluble. stable. injection. and rhighly toxic, preferably with a delayed action to pre: Table 2. Selected Physical Properties of MFAa vent early detection. It therefore must have come as quite a surprise to chemists in England, Germany, and Poland Property Value when they discovered independently during the early stag- hoilina ~oint 104' (760 mm) es of the war that a simple derivative of acetic acid fulfills meltingpoint -32' all of the above criteria for an ideal water poison! water solubility 15% This compound is methyl fluoroacetate (MFA) and it, odor faintlv fruitv at 10 DDm along with fluoroacetic acid (FA) and 2-fluoroethanol, represents one of the most toxic classes of non-protein a Reference (4) substances known. -
Selected Analytical Methods for Environmental Remediation and Recovery (SAM) 2017
EPA/600/R-17/356 | September 2017 www.epa.gov/homeland-security-research Selected Analytical Methods for Environmental Remediation and Recovery (SAM) 2017 Office of Research and Development Homeland Security Research Program This page left intentionally blank EPA/600/R-17/356 | September 2017 Selected Analytical Methods for Environmental Remediation and Recovery (SAM) 2017 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Cincinnati, OH 45268 Office of Research and Development Homeland Security Research Program Disclaimer Disclaimer The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through its Office of Research and Development funded and managed the research described here under Contract EP-C-15-012 to CSRA Inc. This document is undergoing review and has not been approved for publication. The contents reflect the views of the contributors and technical work groups and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Agency. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this document or in the methods referenced in this document does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Questions concerning this document or its application should be addressed to: Romy Campisano National Homeland Security Research Center Office of Research and Development (NG16) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 26 West Martin Luther King Drive Cincinnati, OH 45268 (513) 569-7016 [email protected] Kathy Hall National Homeland Security Research Center Office of Research and Development (NG16) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 26 West Martin Luther King -
List of Lists
United States Office of Solid Waste EPA 550-B-10-001 Environmental Protection and Emergency Response May 2010 Agency www.epa.gov/emergencies LIST OF LISTS Consolidated List of Chemicals Subject to the Emergency Planning and Community Right- To-Know Act (EPCRA), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and Section 112(r) of the Clean Air Act • EPCRA Section 302 Extremely Hazardous Substances • CERCLA Hazardous Substances • EPCRA Section 313 Toxic Chemicals • CAA 112(r) Regulated Chemicals For Accidental Release Prevention Office of Emergency Management This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction................................................................................................................................................ i List of Lists – Conslidated List of Chemicals (by CAS #) Subject to the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and Section 112(r) of the Clean Air Act ................................................. 1 Appendix A: Alphabetical Listing of Consolidated List ..................................................................... A-1 Appendix B: Radionuclides Listed Under CERCLA .......................................................................... B-1 Appendix C: RCRA Waste Streams and Unlisted Hazardous Wastes................................................ C-1 This page intentionally left blank. LIST OF LISTS Consolidated List of Chemicals -
Background Paper on Dichapetalum Cymosum (Gifblaar in Afrikaans) & (Poison Leaf in English)
16th September 2019 Background paper on Dichapetalum cymosum (Gifblaar in Afrikaans) & (Poison Leaf in English) 1. Introduction Toxic compound-containing plants grow worldwide and cause sudden death in livestock. The southern continents of Africa, Australia and South America are the common locations of these plants. Fluoroacetate (the chemical name of this toxic compound) is found in these tropical and subtropical plants generally at low concentrations although some are able to accumulate fluoroacetate in high concentrations. In Africa, most fluoroacetate-accumulating plants belong to the genus (tribe) Dichapetalum. Poison leaf or Gifblaar produces fluoroacetate as a defence mechanism against grazing by herbivores. Ingestion by livestock often results in fatal poisoning, which causes significant economic problems to cattle farmers in South Africa. Several approaches have been adopted to protect livestock from the toxicity with limited success, including fencing, toxic plant eradication and agents that bind the toxin. Genetically modified bacteria (GMB) capable of degrading fluoroacetate have been able to protect ruminants from fluoroacetate toxicity under experimental conditions, but concerns over the release of these microbes into the environment have prevented the application of this technology. Recently, a native bacterium from an Australian bovine rumen was isolated, which can degrade fluoroacetate. The discovery and isolation of this bacterium provides a new opportunity to detoxify fluoroacetate in the rumen.1 1 Leong, L.E.X., Khan, S, Davis, C.K., Denman, S.E., and McSweeney, C.S. (2017) Fluoroacetate in plants - a review of its distribution, toxicity to livestock and microbial detoxification. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 8:55 DOI 10.1186/s40104-017-0180-6 1 Fluoroacetate poisoning due to the consumption of Dichapetalum cymosum (gifblaar), most frequently affects cattle, possibly because the distribution of the plant coincides with mainly cattle-raising areas.